No Kings Protestor Roles and Responsibilities

Well, ladies and gentlemen, we have another No Kings rally in the, in the books.

And today what we're going to do is we're going to take a look at some of the clips that

came for them.

Plus, we're also going to take a look at some of the ways that they organize, because I

think that's important to understand.

There's a lot of people that show up to this that I don't know.

Maybe they have genuine concerns about authoritarianism coming to the United States, but there's

a lot of other people that are essentially representing well-funded organizations.

And again, the impression is always to give, the attempt is always to give this impression,

like there's just this mass movement within the United States.

And the question we have to ask is, okay, is that, is that genuine in the sense that

this is truly organic?

When you looked a lot of the Tea Party protests that were going on across the country,

you didn't see the same network of funding for all of it.

You did have a far more organic approach toward protest and organization and things like

that.

It was people talking to other people.

It was different local groups that were starting up because they were concerned about

what was going on in their country.

But this idea that there were billions of dollars that were actually funding these

protests with a bunch of pre-made signs ready to go wherever you went.

That just wasn't something you saw.

And I know, because I remember, because I participated in some of them.

But it doesn't seem to be the same thing with the No Kings protests.

This doesn't mean that everyone that participates in No Kings protests is a paid protester.

It doesn't mean that they deeply hate the United States.

But it is interesting to see a lot of overlap between organizations which do hate the United

States or are dedicated to the downfall of the United States, being some of the primary

sponsors of these protests.

So today, we're going to do a very quick review over some of what that looks like.

We're going to talk a lot about the tactics that they utilize within these protests.

There's actually a really interesting graphic that I'm going to show you that talks about

the different roles that you can play within these protests.

We're going to talk about some of the hypocrisy, right?

We've got to bring up the points that some of the same people that are talking about No Kings

now, you know, forced grandma to die alone.

So it's a little bit disingenuous that all of a sudden now they're afraid about authoritarianism.

And then we're also going to go over some other just points that I thought were interesting.

Some questions that were asked at No Kings protesters of No Kings protesters to see what

sort of responses they gave.

So we're going to go all of that and more on this episode.

Let's go ahead and jump right into it.

So the first thing I wanted to go over was something that I thought was interesting.

I've never seen this before and it does show kind of an overall breakdown of the various

protest roles.

Now, this graphic's a little bit hard to see on its own.

So I went ahead and enlarged it for you.

So protest roles, there are many ways to participate in a protest and support each other.

Actually, it says support each another.

Okay.

Each fighting our each fighting our own way.

We climb them out together and then it breaks down the various things.

So we have everything from shield soldier, frontliners who use wood boards, swim boards

or signs to form a first line of defense, which I find kind of interesting because especially

like at No Kings and stuff like that, it's like there's people going out there and harming

them or throwing things at them.

The only time they get into trouble is when they're actually breaking the law and they

have to be dispersed and they clash with either usually each other or police or they clash

with somebody that was just there to ask questions.

So I love how this part, like you see all the different things here.

We got one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12, 13, I think it's

13 different protest roles and only one of them is peaceful protestor, right?

Protestors who don't want to fight but join hand in hand with frontliners, sometimes

using their phones to film police aggression.

Right.

So out of all these businesses, you only have one that is listed as peaceful protestor.

Then what do we get into?

We get into things like a frontliner.

A frontliner is a protestor who uses umbrellas to guard against projectiles and cameras while

keeping hands free for when help is needed.

Projectiles and cameras.

Again, who's going in the No Kings protest?

Like who from the right is going in the No Kings protest and throwing things at them?

Right.

That's just not typically our forte.

Now what they might be concerned about is when police are doing things like tear gas

because they've been ordered to disperse usually because they've gotten violent or they've

violated some other law, right?

But there you go.

There's the frontliners.

People's soldiers, they're up there with the wood boards.

They're like your failings, right?

They're up front.

Then you have your frontliner.

They have umbrellas and things like that.

And then you're only one.

You're getting your peaceful protestor.

Then you get into things like flag bearers.

These use signs or a phone to signal to protesters when police are advancing or attacking.

So this is where you start to see some of the additional coordination here in the signaling

of what they're supposed to do and when they're supposed to do and why they're supposed

to do it.

Then you have the range soldier, protesters who throw water bottles, umbrellas and trash

to stop police from advancing.

Yeah, we know they throw far more than that, especially when it comes to Antifa.

Then you have the fire mage, protesters who come prepared to set fire to barricades and

throw flammable projectiles.

I love how the first things they talk about are all this idea of, oh, defense and peaceful.

And here's the guy responsible for setting fires to everything.

That's your fire mage.

So before I get to that, I want to talk about our good friends over at Lear Capital because

Lear Capital has all the information you need in order to learn more about buying precious

metals.

And I don't just mean like buying them and keeping it in your safe at home, although you

can totally do that and Lear can teach you how I mean about also rolling into things

like your 401k rolling into things like your IRA and making it a part of your retirement

plan.

There's a reason why gold has been going up exponentially over the last couple of decades.

And the reason why is because we live in inflationary economies.

We live with a bunch of fiat currencies.

And the bottom line is whenever the government gets in a little bit of trouble, they just

start printing more dollars.

And that makes the value of your dollars go down and that's why people are looking for

other assets.

So why gold and silver?

Because it stood the test of time.

You can't print more gold.

You can't print more silver.

They've tried.

It doesn't work.

Sorry to the alchemists.

So if you want to learn more about how you can actually protect your long term investments,

if you want to learn more about how you can actually hold physical gold and silver.

In your hands, in your safe, not in a bank somewhere, not in somebody else's reserve.

No, right there in your safe.

If you want to do all that, if you want to learn the full spectrum of why diversifying

your portfolio with gold and silver is a good idea.

Having some of it physically on hand is also a good idea.

You can go over to Lear Capital right now.

You can call Lear at 800 707 4575.

That's 800 707 4575 or you can visit Nick for Lear dot com.

That's Nick, the number four Lear dot com.

It costs you nothing to call them up and get the free information kick that they provide.

Plus you can also see if you qualify for a bonus $20,000 in gold or silver with a qualified

purchase.

Again, if all you do is call them up, get the free information kit and learn a little

bit more about this.

You're going to be better off for the process.

So go check out Lear right now.

Let's get back to the show.

All right.

What about your light mage, your light mage or protesters who use laser pointers to obstruct

surveillance cameras, drones and police visitors.

Not to mention they are also the ones that actually use it to shine it into the eyes

of law enforcement and other people in an attempt to damage their eyesight because, you

know, peaceful fire squads, protesters who use water and traffic cones to suppress and

extinguish tear gas canisters, medic protests protest supporters who are able to treat injuries

or have materials to treat tear gas exposure, cop watch protest supporters who use phones

to record violent police and document police tactics and weaponry.

Here's what's interesting about this too.

It's not just the research side of this, which is the tactics and weaponry.

It's the idea that they will go and they will attempt to start fights with the police and

then they will capture it, then they will selectively edit and put on social media so that people

watching at home are like, oh my gosh, I can't believe the police did that.

That just seems a little brutal.

You know, I understand and I support the police, but that that's what they're doing.

That's what they're doing.

They're escalating the violence.

They're escalating the tension.

They're escalating the situation until they get a response from the police that they

can then record selectively edit and put out there.

Now does this mean that the police always behave the way that they should?

No, of course not.

You have bad cops.

You have good cops that make bad decisions in difficult situations.

But understand something.

When you have a protest role here and it's things like range soldier or shield soldier

or fire mage or light mage and then one of these guys get arrested or thrown to the ground

because they're resisting arrest, that's what cop watch is supposed to do.

Take video of is it to make you think these guys were just standing around peacefully

protesting when in reality, they were doing something for different barricader protestors

who build barricades out of found objects as strategic positions to block oncoming police

and traffic that trails protesters.

You see how once again, this is all about like how do we how do you actively abstract or

break the law online comms online protesters who use social media apps like signal telegram

to report on police strategies and provide protesters with real time strategic updates.

There was actually a lot of talk about how that was being used in Minneapolis to confront

ICE and then designers, protest supporters who make inspiring graphics, helpful infographics

or banners for protests and boy, do they make some interesting ones?

But what's far more interesting is the number of signs that are premade that are premade.

You just show up and you grab your sign.

The whole homemade signs.

Yeah, those exist.

They bring them.

But it's amazing how many of them are premade by fairly wealthy individuals.

So that gives you an idea of the various protest roles that you might get to play at any

sort of left wing protest coming near you.

I would avoid being the fire mage, the light mage, the rain soldier.

I would avoid those ones in particular.

Those ones could get you into a lot of trouble.

Those are the sort of ones that people participate in.

And then when they get hurt, they pretend like they're the victim.

When in reality, they were inciting violence and then they had violence meant to them.

They didn't like it so much.

Or again, it was just all the point in order to get the cop watch protest roles to clip

a video and make it look like they're the victims.

Next I want to go into some of the kind of the counterpoint points that were made on this.

So for instance, Valerie and Smith said, never forget when skate parks were filled with

sand and make them unusable during COVID mandated lockdowns.

Never forget how they treated us, locked us down and ruined outdoor parks to keep us

inside.

Yeah, no, it's a valid point, right?

They look around at what Trump is doing right now.

If you look at what Trump is doing, what is he doing?

He's having ice engage in nasty portations.

Why?

Because we had mass illegal immigration.

I've had so many discussions with leftists about this whole immigration policy.

And all of them want to pretend like, yeah, I understand we need to have borders and yeah,

we have to have immigration law.

But why do we have to have nasty portations?

Because you had massive people across that border.

You just agreed to exist.

And you've had massive people in the country illegally, right, who need to be deported because

that's what happens when you violate immigration law, right?

But again, it's this is the sort of thing that they were perfectly comfortable with under

Gavin Newsom in places like California.

By the way, I've had some people go, well, President Trump was president during COVID.

Yes, but it wasn't the federal government doing this.

It was state governments predominantly in blue states.

So once again, it's another one of those things that's kind of funny about all of this.

And it's this idea that they're protesting no kings, right?

Because they want to they want to preserve our constitution.

But then when you point out things that they did like this, they say, well, Trump was president.

Okay, but if you actually understood how our government worked, you understand that the

feds weren't doing this.

It was your governors.

It was your mayors.

That was the people.

It was your mayors that order in the police to go out and arrest people on the beach.

That wasn't happening in Florida.

But again, the same people that think they know so much about civics don't even don't

even know that, you know, basic part.

Of course, another thing that was interesting, Gunther Engelman pointed this out.

There was actually a pretty big pro Trump pro Iran, not the Islamic Republic, but the resistance

protest going on simultaneously.

And of course, that got completely, you know, blacked out by the media.

But I don't think that surprises anyone.

Then we have of course in California, right?

Here we go.

We have some of those protest roles that we mentioned before.

You see the guy with the umbrella.

You see the guy with the long range stuff.

You see the guy that are there.

They're videoing.

There you go.

There's your cop patrol, protest role.

But right off that, you see they're getting violent, right?

This is one of those frontline guys combined with a range soldier guys doing all the stuff

that they're supposed to do.

And then again, when they get arrested, they get upset about it and all of a sudden they're

the victim.

It happens absolutely every single time.

This was probably, I think one of the favorites for everybody that got around.

This is, all right, here we go.

The Mad Max woman in a wheelchair who caught everyone's attention during today's No King's

protest is a disabled self-proclaimed queer activist and artist based in Atlanta.

She claims that people voted for Trump don't have courage and soul and can kiss her whatever.

She loves to spend money on new tattoos, but in the process of asking for donations

on GoFundMe to support herself in the nationwide presentation of Doge Walker, a life performance

protest rooted in disabled queer and marginalized identities.

So yeah, that's, that's interesting.

Here's another thing that obviously I don't like surprises any of us that have been paying

attention.

Look at the teachers unions, the teachers unions, Utah teachers union went to the No King's

protest and held anti-ice signs while marching against Trump.

These are the people teaching your kids, homeschool.

Yeah, it's amazing how much money and how much time and effort the teachers unions spend

supporting things like No King's protests, supporting ideological objectives.

I mean, if you look at what's going on with an American schooling, especially since

COVID, Virginia was a perfect example of this.

We had test scores that were just tanking when it came to reading, when it came to mathematics.

And yet you look at the priorities of the teachers unions and it's all about ideologically

driven stuff.

It's about how do we do, how do we get more pride flags into the classroom?

How do we get more queer theory in the classroom?

How do we get more critical theory, critical race theory into the classroom?

Because that's, that's the real problem we have right now.

And I'm looking at these teachers going, well, you know, they're not going to be

able to read your propaganda.

If you don't, if you don't teach them how to read first, right, you would think that

on some level, they would see that as more of a priority than all of their ideologically

driven the things.

But let's face it, they get a ton of money from their members, they get a ton of money

from states, they get a ton of money from all these outside groups.

And they don't get that to teach kids how to read.

They get it to do this.

They get it to show up in mass.

And then the same people that are showing up for that are showing back up in your kids

classroom.

And they're integrating this into your kids, into your kids' education.

And that doesn't mean they put it in the syllabus, right?

They're not dumb enough to put this stuff in the curriculum or the syllabus that a parent

could go in and actually check on and say, whoa, whoa, whoa, wait a second.

What are you teaching my kids, right?

No, it was COVID.

And all of a sudden when I was learning, the parents started to realize, oh, there's some

pretty shady stuff going on in my kids' classroom.

Well, this is why.

Then this is the Utah teachers union, right?

We're not even talking about the California teachers union on the Massachusetts teacher.

This is Utah, right?

This is a conservative red state.

Another thing that drives me nuts.

I don't know.

It's different where I live, Nick.

Yeah, sure it is.

All right.

Now I want to get into some of the questions that were being asked.

And Nate Friedman, Nate Friedman has a couple of these.

I just think we're great.

And he goes, I crashed and no kings paid protester meeting and then exposed three of them in

four minutes.

Let's go ahead and take a look.

I'm going to give this guy four minutes.

I think this is a great day for him.

Yeah.

No, I don't know.

What's that?

No, I don't know.

Oh, no.

I'm just press asking questions.

Yeah.

Yeah.

But no, I don't know.

OK, so they had a full panic and just talked over each other.

This woman did the scripted right wing troll line, which I guess they must have forgotten

to pick up their signs because that's exactly what they did to me last time.

And before that, a different paid protester with the exact same sign followed me around

the takedown Tesla protest.

So who are these people?

Really?

Keep watching.

That's my job.

I'm just going to do my job.

What do you mean by like, can I also point out that it isn't a fascinating how a lot of

these protests, it seems to be aging white liberals.

It's either really old gen Xers or, or excuse me, it's, yeah, it's gen Xers or boomers.

But it's, it's amazing how that makes up a significant proportion of these protesters.

Marshall.

We help traffic.

We help people with the traffic.

We help cars redirect.

We help bike passengers.

OK.

Are you helping people be safe on the street?

Does that mean you guys are working with the NYPD?

Um, yes.

We talked to them.

Oh, OK.

I did not know that.

That's interesting.

But is there like a preaching before like that you guys work with it?

Yeah.

So.

Yes, we're working with the NYPD.

But we talk to them usually by saying things like F you or pointing out black police officers

calling them race traders.

So yes, you know, it's pretty much coordinating with them.

How do they know that?

Like they're out there marshaling with them.

They're not belong.

And neither am I.

This is you calling ICE thugs and with a $50,000 bounty on ICE agents, you have blood on

your hands.

This is you taking it a step further and calling them the Gestapo back again at a different

protest and again and again.

The company she works for is rise and resist.

They are one of the nonprofits receiving a portion of the $7.6 million from George Soros

and were responsible for the takedown Tesla protests that often resulted in vandalism.

They claim that all of their events are non violent, which is odd because there's hundreds

of pictures of their protesters getting arrested.

One of the things they love to do is organize sit-ins at Trump Tower and they're politely

escorted out of the building and released from custody almost instantly.

And we also say the whole sit-in thing is just so irritating, especially when it's taking

place in traffic.

That's the part we're honestly.

When it comes to traffic or when it comes to these protesters impeding people being able

to get to work or go pick up their kids or get to the hospital in time, we actually need

DAs and commonwealth attorneys that are going to prosecute them.

And seriously, take a look at the consequences of what's going on, especially in cases

where people can't get to the hospital in time or they can't get their children in time.

I want to see some stiff penalties for some of these spoiled brats.

Which means that the supposed king is quite forgiving with people trespassing his family's

home.

The donation link to Rise and Resist goes straight through Act Blue.

Now it's really her associates that are the star players on the protesting field.

Watch this.

You see her?

She works with Karen Shaw, the kazoo lady from the previous No Kings rally.

This is her making the signs for Rise and Resist in their little print shop.

Yes, I'm looking into this print shop.

She protests whatever is on the schedule, back again in front of the courthouse asking

to abolish ICE, which is to take the sides of the vicious violent criminals that have

been deported by ICE.

She wants to quote, free them all, and she's doing this sit-in again instead of Trump's

family home.

The president is very aware of paid protesting now.

Now I saved the best for last with this group because look at this guy here.

Meet Kazimir Yanish.

He is a professional protester.

Here he is with the infamous Karen kazoo lady.

You know how they frequently work in teams.

Look at you also see those signs that they have right there.

Those are not.

Oh, the homemade signs.

Again, they've got millions of dollars coming to him to assist with everything.

What is concerning about this guy in particular is not just that he is a professional protester,

but that he is an election worker.

His official start date was January 2020.

I'm sure that guy has nothing but the upmost and integrity when it comes to ensuring

that election law is followed to the letter.

According to his LinkedIn, he is a director of architecture and engineering at New York

City.

And according to governorsalaries.com, he's receiving an annual wage of $121,000.

The question is, is he protesting on the taxpayers' dime?

Kazimir took part in the famous paid protester group photo that I've exposed.

See the Karen kazoo lady here?

And of course, Stuart Waldman who was on the board of rise and resist.

Kazimir had no social media that I could find, but here he is on his friend's Instagram,

and he's clearly labeled in the caption.

According to Kazimir's LinkedIn, he is also a Columbia University alum.

And here he is at an alumni events.

Kazimir has donated to a fund that was established to provide legal assistance and financial support

to those who get arrested at protests.

I love that Nate runs all this down.

Let's look at the next one that he's got here.

This one was funny.

This one was funny because he was talking about a lack of diversity, a lack of diversity

at the, so let's see what the answer is.

It seems like there's a lack of diversity here today that it's mostly people who look

like you and I.

This is not, it is not for black people, for people of color to be, to get out on the

street there at risk when they do that.

If anybody's going to get arrested here, it's going to be a black person.

It is not safe for them and they don't need to participate.

We need to walk in their name.

Gotcha.

Okay.

So, so let me see.

So apparently it's way too unsafe for black people.

She didn't mention anybody else, just black people to get out and actually protest, which

was shocking because it seemed like during the BLM riots there wasn't, there wasn't much

of a problem there as long as, you know, buildings can get set on fire.

But again, this is the justification for the complete lack of diversity apparently.

Wow.

Okay.

What do you think about voter ID?

Do you think it's racist?

It's 100% a tactic to control the population and prevent people from voting so that the

only votes, so that the, so that the, so that the gerrymandering can work.

Oh my gosh.

I would like to, I would like to present Virginia as exhibit A to this woman.

So they, so let me get the strength.

Voter ID, you being able to show photo ID proof of who you are so that when you vote,

first of all, you, you get to vote, but then somebody can't vote in your name or somebody

can't vote illegally, which would disenfranchise the legal voters.

That's somehow 100% racist and, and that this is a tactic.

The idea of having voter ID as a tactic in order to support gerrymandering.

Are we serious right now?

Like how does this even follow?

How does this even make sense?

Oh my gosh.

There's more.

All right.

Let's take a look at this one right here.

This is another one from Nate Friedman.

Do I do a new woman's work at these protests?

There we go.

Do you think that the United States or Iran is more of a dictatorship?

I think the United States or Iran is more of a dictatorship?

I've never lived in Iran.

You know, I'm a tariff from, I've never lived in Iran.

You know, I've never lived in North Korea, but I'm pretty sure, I'm pretty sure we could

safely say that their rules with respect to things like freedom of speech or protesting

there's a little bit more draconian.

So I wonder if this guy is aware of what happened to the last round of protesters in Iran.

Yeah, because they weren't, they weren't allowed to march.

Thousands of them were gunned down by their own government.

But, you know, unless he actually spends a summer there, he's not really sure on whether

that he can say if Iran is more of a dictatorship than the United States.

Like this, this is just the sort of idiocy, oh man.

Would you like the US to lose this war?

Oh, yeah, down with the US empire.

I've been terrorizing the whole world.

The US is real both, and have been aggressors in the Middle East for who knows how long,

you know.

I love it when they talk about the US and Israel's being aggressors in the Middle East

for I don't know how long.

What would be an interesting case study for these guys is to take a look at the, a more

comprehensive view of Middle Eastern history and recognize who was actually running things

in the Middle East before you had Arab Muslim armies come out of the peninsula and essentially

conquer all of it.

It's amazing how when you take history back and you actually look at what was going

on at the time and what were the various ethnic groups and what were the various religions

and play and all that in the Middle East, it looks nothing like it does today.

And that was a result of conquest and now look, conquest happens, right?

I get it.

It's just amazing to me that these guys have no conception of history whatsoever.

They've been fed a particular line and that's the only line they're going to go with.

And even if you look at the modern periods of the Middle East, I mean, to suggest that

the United States and Israel have been the primary aggressors in that area is again to

either deliberately misunderstand or to just lie.

That's not to say that there hasn't been aggression on behalf of those countries in Middle

East, but this idea that it's just this kind of unprovoked thing that just materializes

all over the place.

There's really no reason for whatsoever except that we're just mean and cruel and have an

empire.

It's just absurd and it's verifiably false.

Here's where Nate, here he goes, he goes, almost every time I go to a protest, some

singham or sore soldier comes to stop the interview.

I'm going to continue to expose as many as I can while I investigate the money trail.

Let's go ahead and look at Sam Lee here.

I just like, OK, I'm just interviewing her.

Are you stopping my interview?

Oh, no.

Oh, you step in front of it.

I've come you step there.

I've come you see, yes, see, this is this is the sort of irritating tactic, right?

Where somebody comes up and plays stupid like this.

But really what it is is they don't want their people getting exposed on social media.

Because whenever the people start to talk to a camera and start to do an interview,

it doesn't go very well for them.

And look, you can say all day long selective editing, but you're even, you're seeing

some of this right here in context.

Now, maybe they had a longer conversation and didn't it'll make the final cut.

That happens all the time, but you're watching their statements in context.

And that's what they don't want getting out, right?

They desperately don't want people sitting there going, oh, I don't know why I'm here.

I just, I just, someone handed me a sign or they have somebody that says something

just outrageously stupid and that gets on there.

Speaking, speaking of some of the other activities going on at these protests, here's,

here's a fun one, an NGO was registering voters at the No Kings protests.

Americans asked to register as a Republican and they say you can't,

they only register Democrats.

By the way, that's a huge violation.

You can't do that.

You can't get money as an NGO to go out and register voters and then only register

the political party that you want.

That's a, that's a big no go.

But perhaps the one of the best takedowns of the evening comes from our good friend Scott

Jennings and my gosh, this guy, I can't believe I'm saying it, but Scott Jennings actually makes

CNN worth watching, but only when he's on.

That's it.

So let's go ahead and take a look what Scott had to say here.

These No Kings rallies actually look pretty representative to me of the Democratic coalition.

I saw people flying the hammer and sickle in New York City.

I saw Hezbollah flags.

I saw Hamas flags.

I saw Palestinian flags.

I saw trans signs.

I see weirdo, liberal boomers out there.

This is pretty representative of the Democratic coalition and that's who funds it as well,

by the way.

And so I think if America looks at this and says what are the two parties stand for,

they got it at the No Kings.

No, I think if you Americans are out there, you're out there, the Republicans are saying you like

cameras sickle flag.

That's not what that No Kings did for.

They had a bunch of that and that it come from somewhere else in No Kings room.

I did.

I went to six and I'll tell you there's so much excitement.

There's so much energy.

Yeah, a lot of free speech for a country with a lot of free speech.

These No Kings rallies.

You see what a great job he does is like he he set some up to say what that's not what this

is about.

Yeah, there's a lot of communist flags playing around and yeah, there's a lot of Palestinian flags around.

A lot of support for Hamas flying around.

A lot of people that are demonstrating the genuine hatred for the United States.

Not just a frustration with Donald Trump, but a genuine hatred for the United States.

And that's not what this is about.

And then I know this guy because I served with him in the Virginia General Assembly.

He's like, I went to six of these rallies.

He's like, wow, that's a lot of freedom of speech.

That's a lot of freedom of speech for a dictatorial regime now, isn't it?

And he doesn't know what to say to that.

Because again, the whole premise of this is ridiculous.

They're going out in their and they're protesting all over the country.

And guess what? Nobody's stopping them.

Nobody's rounding them up. Nobody's putting them in concentration camps.

Nobody's doing to them.

What like the Iranian regime was doing to their people, right?

Nobody was doing that.

And by the way, not a peep out of them about Iran, right?

Not a peep out of them about Iranian regime massacring tens of thousands of their own

citizens for going out and protesting against the government.

And then when you try to ask these guys, what sort of rights have been to my right to an abortion?

Okay, where? Where?

What is Donald Trump down on this?

My right to health care.

Okay, where have you been denied your right to health care?

First of all, you can't have a right to the labor or property of other people.

But where has Donald Trump been infringing on that?

And then they will talk about welfare programs and things of that nature.

You don't have a right to welfare programs.

This idea that by sheer existence, you should have a right to the property or labor of somebody

else. That may be a, that may be a nice communist theory of reality, but that's not the theory we have

here. And so when you end up, when you're finding out is that there's a lot of hyperal

upbolic language on all of this, but they haven't lost any rights.

And then they start to think, what about the due process with respect to illegal immigration?

The due process for deporting someone is legally ascertaining that they don't have a legal

right to be in the United States and then removing them. That is the due process.

We don't have to have a trial to determine whether or not you quote, we don't have to convict

you of violating federal immigration law to determine that you're not legally in this country

and then remove you. I've made this point several times. If I broke into one of their houses,

they would call the cops to have me removed. Imagine me saying, no, no, no, I didn't break in.

I'm undocumented in your home. And now you're not allowed to remove me until we actually have a

trial. And I get convicted by a jury of my peers for trespassing or breaking or entering.

But until all of that happens, I get to stay in your house. They would think that was ridiculous.

And yet when it happens into the country, nope, nope, we think due processes is you get to stay

here until we've tried and convicted you for violations of federal immigration law. That's not

the process. That's not the process. But look, let's also let's also dig in to who is funding all

this because like we said multiple times. This is not just a series of organic protests that are

that are taking place and it's pretty obvious. This comes from Fox News, Saint Paul, Minnesota,

a network of about 500 groups with an estimated three billion and combined annual revenues is behind

the coordinated nationwide No Kings protest Saturday, including communist groups who are using the

call for a revolution according to a Fox News digital investigation. According to a copy of

the permit for the flagship march in Saint Paul, Minnesota, indivisible, a nation, a national

well-heeled democratic political advocacy organization funded by billionaire George Soros is the

lead coordinator for the protest for Fox News digital is also identified key participation by

network of radical socialists and communist organizations funded by Neville Roy Singhham,

an American tech tycoon and a vowed communist living in China. We did a whole feature on him,

gosh, a couple podcasts ago where we talk about a lot of the things that data Republican has uncovered

with respect to where the money is coming from. Singhham is basically, he's a lot like George

Soros, except that Singhham is like an avowed communist. Over nearly a decade, Singhham has

financed a constellation of activist institutions that promote revolutionary socialist politics

and frequently collaborate in protest campaigns, including the people's forum in New York, the

party for socialism and liberation, the answer coalition and code pink whose co-founder Jody Evans

is married to Singhham. These groups work closely with the Freedom Road Socialist organization.

They are all sending members to the protests and one group said they plan to bring a message

of revolution to the protest. It's important to understand that in all of this. Again, this is where

this is not just average everyday citizens that are walking out there because they feel like their

rights are just being eroded by this administration because your rights are not being eroded by this

administration as evidenced by all of the protests. What it is is you have a lot of people on the left

that think they're entitled to certain government funds. They think they're entitled to certain

government services. They think it should be free and easy to get. They don't think they should have

to do much of anything to get them if anything to get them, right? They believe one of the things that

made them furious about doges that are uncovered just how much of our tax dollars is going to fund.

Not welfare, not construction projects. No, it's it's funding ideologically driven

objectives and missions by organizations like these guys, right? And then when you point out that

that's not an appropriate use of tax dollars, all of a sudden, oh, my rights are being my rights are

being taken away from me because they do. They think and this is this is key socialist behavior.

They think they have a right to the labor and property of other people. They think they have

a right to that. And so when they're denied it, this is where you see them using arguments like, well,

if I can't pursue happiness, if I don't have enough money or if I don't have access to the things

I want to pursue happiness, well, then I'm being denied fundamental rights guaranteed to me in the

declaration of independence. It's like, well, no, well, first of all, the declaration of independence

doesn't guarantee you rights. The declaration of independence is a statement of beliefs.

And nowhere in the constitution are you guaranteed the rights, which include somebody else

having to sacrifice for you. You're not guaranteed the right to other people's property and labor.

We fought a war about this and Democrats lost. Yeah, they don't get slaves anymore.

And they don't get to they don't get to make tax slaves either.

But this is the sort of thing that they believe in and understand. I mean,

sing-home is not stupid enough to believe that the the people that he's throwing, you know,

signs to are going to be able to build his little communist utopia. He understands the difference

between useful idiots that you use in order to demoralize and tear down a culture and a country.

And then you replace those people with people that can actually do things, right?

The problem is is that I think they're a little overly dependent on the people that are just

the useful idiots. And your ebesment of talks about this, you know, constantly and in his work

that he used to do in coordination with the KGB. And it was the idea that you you go and you

demoralize. And we we've talked a lot about our Tonyo Gramsci on this and how and Gramsci

talked about the march through the institutions. Gramsci came to the conclusion that the reason

why communism wasn't picking up in places like the US or the UK or France or whatever it was

is because there were sufficient cultural institutions to protect the values that we had in this

country. And one of the values that we had was you have a right to your own labor and you have a

right to acquire to earn and acquire property and you have a right to build a business and you have

a right to do all these things, right? That's not going to be guaranteed for you. It's not going

to be given to you. But we're going to prevent the government from either stealing from you. We're

going to prevent the government from preventing you from going out and pursuing happiness. And

what's happening right now is that the leftist version of that is no, no, no, the government needs

to be controlling everything. That's what socialists believe. Socialists believe that the government

should be controlling all the means of production. And some people will say, no, that's communism.

They're like, no, it's socialism. Communists, communists actually believe that the in state is a

classless stateless society where everything's just kind of owned and common and everyone's fine

with that. And you, you don't actually need a government arm to keep it in place because there's

so much prosperity and happiness that why would you want anything else? That's when communists say,

real communists has never been tried. They're correct because it's a fairy tale. It's like saying,

well, you know, writing real unicorns has never been tried. Yeah, because unicorns don't exist.

But it's, it's not something that's ever going to happen. But what socialism was advertised

out by people like Lenin is, well, socialism is this intermediary step between whatever the system

that they're currently taking over is and communism. Socialism is when the government comes in

and runs all the means of production, right? They do that on behalf, behalf of the people,

right? Because the people aren't ready yet for the dictatorship of the proletariat. So now the

government has to come in. So I always say, socialist are worse than communists. Socialists are

basically communists who gave up on the in state. They don't think you're ever going to reach

a point where you can have a classless stateless society and everyone just lives in harmony. And so

they want to be the ones controlling what the government controls, which is a fundamentally

everything, right? So that's, that's who these guys are. And that's who's driving a lot of this

because you see it in the rhetoric. You see it in the rhetoric. They will, every once well,

they will give some sort of like hat tip or some sort of nod to the constitution or the founding

fathers. But let me ask you this question. Let me ask you this question. The same people right now

that are invoking 250th anniversary of America, we don't have any kings. We fought a revolution

over this. We have a constitution. We, the founding fathers would be rolling over the

groups. The same people saying that right now to no kings protest where any of them saying that

when blue, blue governors and blue states were completely shutting down your rights to be able

to work, your rights to be able to worship, your rights to be able to go out and congregate.

Were they complaining about any of that? Were they invoking the constitution? No, of course not.

Of course not. Right. Do you think if they got power again that the constitution, like if we

got out, let's say the Democrats got in charge and Gavin Newsom is president and they got control

the Senate. They got control the House. They stacked the Supreme Court and we say, Whoa,

whoa, whoa, wait a second guys. The founding fathers would be rolling over the graves. Wait a

second guys. The constitution is supposed to limit this. Do you think they'd be like, oh man,

that's a good point. I guess I should be intellectually consistent. No. Of course they wanted.

No, what they wouldn't do is they would look at you and say we're trying to achieve social justice.

The constitution, that's an antiquated document. The founders, they were a bunch of rich,

white, straight slave owners that didn't want to pay their taxes. What do we care? And how do we

know they would say that about the constitution? How do we know they would say this about the founders

because they do because they have because we see kids and we see college students regurgitating

these statements. And I don't think anybody has any confusion about which party those college

students are those students for voting for. That's what they believe. They're not using these terms

because they love the constitution. They're not invoking the founders because they respect the founders.

They're invoking these terms because we love and respect the constitution and the founders.

That's why. And as soon as they get power, we know what to expect. We can expect what we're

seeing in Virginia right now. And Virginia right now, the moment they got it, nobody wants to take

your guns. Oh, except for the Democrats that took power now want to take your guns. Nobody wants to

gerrymander. Oh, except for the Democrats that took power now they want to gerrymander. Nobody

wants to raise taxes on them. Oh, except for the Democrats who took power now rain taxes on

everybody. Nobody wants to indoctrinate your kids in schools. Oh, except for the Democrats that

took power now they're indoctrinating your kids in your schools. Every single time we either start

believing them when they tell us who they are. And likewise, we stop believing them when all

of a sudden they use references that we appreciate because they're not doing that because they've come

around to our way of thinking right when we say, Oh gosh, what if the shoe was on the other foot?

They don't care. They don't care. This is a useful tactic for them. And so they will continue to use

it. And what it's going to take is for people on the right to recognize it for what it is and say,

okay, look, they're not invoking the founders because they care. They're not invoking the constitution

because they care. We know that if they're in power, they don't care about those things limiting

their power. So if we know that when they invoke it on us, we need to stop taking them at their work.

We need to stop assuming that maybe they've come around to our way of thinking on some of these

things and recognize the dangers of centralized power. They don't. They love it. They want it.

So why does it still move us? Why do we still feel compelled on some level to pay homage to this

as if, Oh, well, you know, I really need to really need to consider what they're saying. I mean,

look, I'm a big believer that truth is truth. And so somebody actually wants to present a good

argument. I don't mean try to appeal to my emotions. I don't mean try to, you know, convince me

that that they actually hold sacred the same things I hold sacred. But if they want to make a good

argument for a particular thing, Trump did this. I think that was a violation of the constitution.

Well, now we have something objective that we can analyze. But that's not what they do.

You can see it by all these men on the street interviews. They speak in hyperbolic language.

They call everyone a fascist. They thought Charlie Kirk was a fascist. So ladies and gentlemen,

please stop taking them seriously. They know what they're doing. And we should know what they're

doing by now. But the other thing that we also have to recognize is that if we are not willing

to use government power legitimately, I'm not talking about throwing out the constitution.

If we're not willing to use government power legitimately to shut down some of the foreign

funding that is coming in from hostile regimes in order to finance this, well, then

are we are we seriously going to sit by and just say, well, you know, of course,

of course, we should allow this sort of unchecked influence in all of our public university system.

Of course, we should allow this sort of unchecked influence within our teachers unions

in our public school system. Of course, we should allow these different groups to coordinate

with the CCP and communist entities in order to infiltrate and promote this stuff. Of course,

we should do that. And of course, it should just be allowed. I think we need to ask a hard question.

You know what? I'm going to reference something that the George source people like the

open society because Karl Popper talked about the paradox of tolerance. And the idea was,

is that if you're going to live in a generally tolerant society, well, there's certain things you

can't tolerate, right? You can't tolerate people that want to destroy your society using your system

against you. See, the rules that we made in America are made for Americans. And it's made in

order to achieve a particular in-state. And that in-state is is that you should be generally

free to be able to live your life the way that you want, provided you're not infringing on the rights

of others. They want to use the benefits of a society that created that in order to completely

revolutionize, demoralize, and overthrow it with something different. And almost in every

instance, it's some form of Marxism. It's some manifestation of Marxist ideology.

So again, they will afford you. None of the benefits that they are currently being afforded

when they get power. We know this because when they take over different institutions or

organizations or businesses, that's what they do. They get rid of everybody that doesn't think

like them because they're the bad guys and they staff it with people that think just like them.

And then that's it. That's game over ideological capture of a particular organization or institution.

So it is time. It is time for us to start more closely investigating this stuff. And again,

it can start with something so simple. Don't use our tax dollars or make them available for these

organizations to push revolutionary propaganda to fundamentally overthrow the United States.

I don't think that's too much to ask. And I think it's about time we get serious about doing it.

Once again, thank you for joining us and we'll see you next episode.