
About this episode
Today’s episode is about a momentous trial and the incendiary book that followed: the trial was of Adolf Eichmann, convicted by an Israeli court in 1961 of orchestrating the Holocaust, and the book was Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963), which questioned the grounds on which he was prosecuted. What did Arendt mean by ‘the banality of evil’? Why was she convinced that the case against Eichmann was badly misjudged? Was the trial really intended to serve as a history lesson? And if it was, what was it designed to teach?
Next time in Politics on Trial: Nelson Mandela vs Apartheid
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Get every episode summarized
Each time Past Present Future publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Past Present Future

The Lives of the Philosophers: Elizabeth Anscombe
Past Present Future
Sep 13, 20261:01:27pending

Now & Then with Robert Saunders: Gladstone vs Disraeli Part 2 (Burnham vs Badeno...
Past Present Future
Sep 9, 202655:08pending

Now & Then with Robert Saunders: Gladstone vs Disraeli – The Bulgarian Horrors
Past Present Future
Sep 6, 202656:43pending

The Lives of the Philosophers: Jean-Paul Sartre
Past Present Future
Sep 2, 202654:57pending