About this episode
This week, Alan and Lionel unpack Prince Harry’s ongoing trial against the Daily Mail’s publisher, Associated Newspapers—and the implications for media ethics and privacy.They also discuss US government intrusion into journalism, in light of the FBI’s seizure of a Washington Post reporter’s electronic equipment to reveal her sources, which Alan calls “menacing in the extreme”.
Though a judge has temporarily blocked the government from searching seized data, what does this mean for the first amendment?
Plus, with certain publications reportedly aware of US plans to abduct Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro, Alan and Lionel seem to disagree: do reporters have a duty to report on potentially illegal operations, or should they choose not to publish?
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Media Confidential publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Media Confidential
Slapped: Why can’t we talk about Nigel Farage’s crypto donations?
Media Confidential
Killing with impunity: the death of Amal Khalil in Lebanon
Media Confidential
Trump: AI accusations and assassination attempts
Media Confidential
Press Gazette and the end of ‘Barbara Santini’
Media Confidential