Reports Of US Servicemen Deployed Under Guise Of “Training” & Graham: “Trump Is Resetting The World”

Back to is in war. World War One. War. Correct. World War Two. War. Correct. The Vietnam War. War. Oh, I'm sorry, Carl. That was a

Congressional-authorized counteroffensive. Don't worry, we get right back on track with the Korean War. War. No, that was police action.

No, they had tanks and stuff. Well, the police have tanks now. Don't they, Carl? Okay, the first and second Iraq war.

War. They identify as military action. It's a bit like pronouns, except we kill people. All right, how about Libya? War. War. I'm sorry. There was

kinetic action, not a war. Venezuela. Well, it was an active war, I think. No, I'm sorry. That was a law enforcement

operation, not a war. Iran. It's a war. We're doing war things. No, not war things. Preemptive retaliatory

de-escalation action. No, that's not a thing. All right, judges. Okay, how about the war on terrorism? War. No, it was a coalition-led

conditional operation. How about Afghanistan? Afghanistan was the war on terror. No, I'm sorry. That was a pre-authorized defense stabilization

initiative. Okay, can somebody tell me the rules here? War on poverty, Carl. Well, poverty. That's not even a thing. I'm sorry. I hate to do this to you. It's a

trick question. We don't have poverty in the United States. The Dow went up to 50,000. Can I even get that high? Amazing. Don't

worry about the Epstein files. War on Christmas. The coffee cup thing? No, that's not a war. There's a war for the soul of the nation, whether or not I can

wish my children Merry Christmas. Okay, you know what? I quit. I don't want to do this anymore. Today's magical phrase. Carl, you just became a United States

Congressman. Congratulations, Representative Carl. Merry Christmas. It's March. Well, okay. Happy Otica. It starts with a simple question.

And ends an objective reality reality. Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves.

And as the next 24 hours, for it's free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day.

Welcome to the daily wrap up.

Sunday, March 8th, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. You know, I often it's what we discussed on the show is very serious.

I mean, 99% of what we get into is important, serious. You know, it affects people's lives. And so I try to have a level of decorum when

the show, you know, that's why I feel like it's important to, to, you know, just act the part, right? And not necessarily in a, you know, other than you should be kind of way or not who you usually are.

But just that it, that things like this necessitate a certain level of seriousness. All of that's be said that I felt today after everything we've been just

word of weird place in this country. And it's not necessarily different than what we've seen before, but it's at a level that I haven't seen before.

And it's like the last few days, but today in particular, I'm just like, like build kind of like you laugh or cry kind of moments, right? I mean, we're, we're.

I still argue very strongly and I hope you guys consider this every time I bring it up that I feel like we are at a point where because there's a lot of very

least opportunity for real change. And that's why it's very uncomfortable. But that doesn't change the fact that it's uncomfortable and that there's a lot of very kind of, you know, cognitive distance moments for Americans in this country to.

Grappling with things that they don't necessarily want to be the case, but are being forced to acknowledge our real.

And so sometimes you just got to laugh at how crazy it is, you know, and I felt like that was needed to just.

It's important, you know, and so it is much as that still did make a very real point that's.

And on top of the fact that it's just that ridiculous and that obvious what's being done and always has been.

Just again, to a higher degree that I've seen, but no different from left and right, but the world sees that.

And let's also point out their governments are largely similar, if not exactly the same, but still the moment of people laughing at the way this country is operating.

And in many cases, looking at it as representative of Americans, I don't think that's the case, not really, but it is where we are.

That's how ridiculous this is and it might as well just be a Saturday night live skip because it feels ridiculous.

We're watching them tell you things that we know aren't true.

And then just playing this game that contradicts things they've said before or what they say is going to happen later.

Now, I also want to start out by pointing out that I completely forgot about the time change today.

And I started late later than I usually do and I figured out it's okay.

Now, we're much later than usual today.

And so for that point, two things, I'm likely going to, I mean, I will see if I may end up just going through it all, but probably cutting short some degree, whatever I don't cover in today's show, I'll probably point to at the end, then I will get to tomorrow.

But it just be that being said, it is very late for me anyway.

So it might just be cut quite short, but there's a lot to get to today that I wanted to include.

And even on top of that, a lot that we, I'm not even going to get to today.

But generally speaking, what we're going to talk about in the way I organized today, I have a few things I wanted to get out of the, get into the conversation right away.

And that's some updates on these stories we've been covering, for example, the, the, the naval exercise discussion and follow-up reports about that ship being unarmed.

And I think that's very important.

But still, you could still argue with, you know, I'll question everything as always.

That's how we should always look at it, but it's important to see.

Well, I'll get into it when we get there, but that's reports we're talking about.

And we're another update on the Minab school bombing, showing that it does appear to be a US missile that hit it.

Which we already know, but these are important to see.

And some follow-up points around the school, but I want to get into a really important part, a point early in the conversation that is, that is reports.

It's not necessarily provable is really, but it's, it's very important for a lot of different reasons that I think we discussed this early around the conversation of not just deployment.

Which I'm, I mean, I've said this for a very long time, whether we're talking about a rack or any other situation.

I'm very much of the mind that they already have assets on the ground.

I think that's, I mean, I, for a lot of reasons, I think all governments are doing similar things.

But whether it's intelligence or just, you know, under the guise of diplomacy or USAID, any D kind of things.

But on top of that, I think it's quite clear that there has been operations.

Even if we're talking about the Kurds and we'll get to that in the show if we get to it today, the whole thing of Trump going, I don't want them to be involved.

Well, that's ridiculous seeing as how you've already paid them, armed them and sent them into a run.

So clearly that's him pretending like he's not involved in that or acting like he doesn't want it to be because I think maybe there's too much attention on it.

That's because you guys did it that way.

But anyway, I want to get to this because of the idea of people being on the ground or rather being sent there and the reports coming out of personnel.

Service men, women, you know, just a military being a rather conscientious objectors saying that I'm not going to go to war.

Many of which I'm seeing saying outrightly I'm outright I'm not going to go to war for Israel.

This is a really important thing to see.

As always, I've said throughout my tire time doing this in history that I what I've noticed and very well documented in many books people discussed over the years.

In every revolution, the most common factor is when the rather I guess more the the straw the broke the camel.

What the worth of the analogy I'm looking for, you know, whatever caused it like to finally happen, right?

The straw the broke the camel's back. There's a better analogy for that.

But the point is that usually is when the enforcement arm changes, changes sides, shifts direction.

And so, you know, when you can look back and find this and a lot of times it happens with coups where they're manipulated or you know paid.

But in this case, what I'm what people to think about is whether or not we're actually starting to see the enforcement arm military police.

Whatever it is starting to go, you know, this just isn't right.

I don't feel like this is okay. And many of them already exist, but go along and get along.

And I think what we're seeing is a lot of service.

People just saying this is not okay with me. Now, prisoner had an interesting report that we're going to get into claiming that he's talked to a lot of these people.

And this is what he does, you know, he's activism and and works with a lot of military servicemen.

And finding out that they're being reportedly deployed.

And then on top of that, finding out that they're being told that they're in fact going to training, which the argument being because so many people don't want to do this that ultimately they're being.

You know, I mean, let's be real. They signed up for this and the reality is the military seems to be able to do whatever they want to them, which I find insane.

But that they're being told training and then sent to something are on being the implication.

And I think that's just incredible. Now, it is a report, but I want to get into the supplementary information all the way around it that makes this seem far more relevant and important than just the report itself.

Now, Lindsey Graham said something that I think is just exactly what's going on and I'm not sure exactly why he would say it other than that this is something that somebody out there an entity that I think is dictating a lot of what's happening very much wants to be seen, but only through Trump sort of like we want Trump to battle around.

So we're not the ones doing it, but we can make sure we guide it, you know, this it's all of this and we talked about the great reset.

And how this is still continuing to this very moment and the reality of him telling you that Trump is reset resetting the world.

I the language means something reimagining and we'll go through all of this and how this is just a continuation and that what's happening around the world I think is very much a part of that, but I'll give you my thoughts on it.

We'll talk about eugenics that came up again. I think is very important a lot of propaganda and get into some updates about Iran and the bombings taking place conversations about the oil prices and the

oil from a global perspective, but gas prices when it comes to the United States censorship around all of this, which seems to be exploding.

And a lot of other points that I have a thing about anthropic I still have not gotten into that in depth in rather covered in depth.

I've been looking into it for a while now in the background and I might not get to it today, but I was going to do a part of it today.

But I want you guys to make sure you're paying attention to what that how that's playing a factor.

I really do think that just with the AI element in and of itself, but anthropic in particular for whatever part they're playing in all this with this DHS kind of department of war.

You know what we're going to get into them being told they're a supply chain risk if they don't do what they're you know allow them to be able to use the AI to kill people autonomously.

But that this to me is the kind of interconnected point to the larger conversation right the war is obviously horrible and going and the genocide continuing.

But it's those have been going on a long time we've seen wars and it always wasn't always about at least on its face some larger agenda.

I do think that's kind of always the case.

But today I think we're seeing this kind of AI like lavender, hopsoora Israel and the way they're using volunteers AI to just murder people and provably without human involvement.

Despite what they were saying could have seen this obscene disgust, but I've also seen them using it with essentially mindless adherence to just what the AI tells you.

And I think this is the world that's being built out.

I think it's very important to think about so I want to start while I was always forget to do this and I want to make sure we shout this out because this was the original place it came from despite some people out there.

Tim pool adjacent entity out there framing it as if it was their content but you know posting beneath it that this is somebody else's it's just so weird how this platform often works.

But here's the original clip that I think you guys should see it's it's it's funny it's from reason I guess and this is the.

You know commentary about how ridiculous all this is and you know you can always take it as partisan everybody seems to within the partisan field they look for the parts that stand out to me it doesn't matter what side they think they're fighting for when they think when when you're calling out is obvious right but the game they're playing with war same thing by administration day with plenty of different words to weasel around it knack like they're really not there.

It's a exact example is Kirby and Ukraine and the idea of troops marching in side by side in unison of the only thing that we define as as what they call it like I forget the term mark whether it was just invasion or whatever the term they were using and eventually that did happen they still pretend that wasn't it it's just the way our government operates guys.

So on that opening part I talked about I want to give give some updates on some of these points that we have been discussing the new republic covered this and here's the actual original.

Arc excuse me platform website that actually posted this I'll show you just where it says that the report simply being the most chilling detail in the U.S. attack on an Iranian naval ship and if you forgot this story the simple quick reality is that they were part of enable exercise and I that it has fleshed out to appear exactly like I thought the.

Case was which is that they showed up with the submarine and ultimately the report was they were supposed to be there with the ship they just last second pulled it out the U.S. government.

Well I think it was 17 from a correctly different countries involved I could be wrong in the number and Iran was there they came with their ship now the reports are continuing to show that they showed up were part of this and as I showed you before Milan I think is the acronym that they historically are mostly unarmed or rather either unarmed or brings up the amount needed to expel what they're going to do.

It's an armed exercise and that's very common actually now it's not all the time that's why discussed last time but the reality of this was that they this was under the guise of diplomacy this was a you know an exercise where they're joining together and this happens all the time and the U.S. government shows up in a submarine basically is part but not really wait and at the end of it the Iranian ship pulls out and then on the coast of Sri Lanka they secretly go up to them and shoot them and take the ship now as more reports come out that it was unarmed.

It makes it even more alarming now there's main points to understand that one they've never declared war so far neither as Iran neither have they allow on some of the war powers act because Trump himself said very clearly I attacked first there's no eminent threat.

So there's no approval from Congress there's no authorization for you some military force and there's no war powers allowance so there is no legal reality here no matter what their justification is right even if it wasn't eminent response

or let's just say if it was an eminent attack right now technically he would have those 60 day period to continue to do what he's doing and eventually have to verify that Congress but he himself said it was not he said it was him attacking first and the claim of eminent has completely fallen out and they know that that's why they're trying to water it down with different things now.

So that being said that means no matter what they were in the situation and there is no legal reality where they could have bombed them in international waters or not armed or not.

That would be considered an act of war and that would be illegal under the guys under the under international law.

So on top of it they didn't rescue the people after they attacked them.

They may sound crazy to the uninformed about the international legalities whether or not you respect them or believe they should be there it is the current reality of the US government does sign on to it every year or ever just being a part of the international community and the UN and what they pretend they're doing.

And that means that they're required in the Geneva conventions to rescue people that after engagement and if there's no risk which there was not they did not many most of them died they left.

Remember because what he told headsets told you maximum lethality hit the punch them while they're down we don't want to fair fight Graham recently said right so that means you basically trick somebody wait for them to be on arms sneak up on them and fire them then leave them all to die because that's what honorable people do right that's what the America first you know it's insane.

In what world has that ever been what we at least pretend we are and so whether they were armed was the least important part.

Now it's coming out even more so that they seem to have not been armed now as it says here the Iranian ambassador to India Mohammed fatali condemned the attack and said the ship was armed so this is from the Iranian side.

Now what we have now is and of course question all of them just because Iranian does not therefore mean dishonest frankly if you're going to look at it that way it's far more likely that our people are lying since that's the most obvious track record.

But neither side should be assumed to be lying it should be considered look at it consider it question it look at all the facts now what we have is the former.

Indian for minister I believe and he was on the record I think they haven't tagged right in here he came out right away and said this was on armed and that these people were it was a war crime or just a crime.

Now that was the still as far as I can tell the Indian government mode even particular have yet to really clarify which would be the final point now so that that was there now there's a lot of dispute and fairly so now we have the Iranian ambassador who's come out and said yes it was unarmed course they could be lying but so now we have is two people who have information and insight into the situation telling you that it was unarmed.

And we have examples of these situations being exactly that in the past we have nobody on the other side giving you anything other than not that's not true and here's what you know so it could be that they're both lying but the evidence suggests that it was unarmed and it says we will respond to this assassination very strongly the ship was unarmed I remember even if it was armed that was still a crime under international law because of everything we just discussed.

And in a regular maneuver at sea I think the United States and the Zionist regime want to disturb and destroy all the international law international norms I agree with that in fact I think that's exactly part of what they're trying to accomplish why because look at what Israel's done for two years.

Literally in the spitting in the face of everything they ever claim they're fighting for and that's not to say that every other country cared at all but at least they pretended and maybe that's worse I don't know what the point is is real has continued to laugh at it to violate it to sneer to do everything they're not supposed to do.

You know murdering children starvation the whole damn thing.

So now if this becomes a casual dragging the world into this different situation and Trump displays all of this acting like it's normal and quite literally mean lying to line right now guys human she and every point you saw Israel do and God's is genocide is still going used to now see hegs that Trump in the rest parenting those same points it's kind of like a match between the Iraq war narratives and Israel's cause of genocide narratives.

So that then gives cover to what they did right they're going to look well okay well if you're going to go after me then go after Trump well you know what I agree but it's going to spread this out.

So the fact that he said that should matter and the fact that it was a crime when they're every possible reality should matter.

And look if you want to go but a wrong bad guy you know what you're probably right prove it make your case I wouldn't disagree if you've got evidence it still does not change the legal reality of the situation.

That's what's a frustrating about this is it's going to it's sort of it's like the what about is my guess in a way that they always made fun of about the left but they're just doing the same thing but pivoting to something that doesn't even.

And make the point invalid right I mean it's just so frustrating that it's it's like saying well they're bad they did bad things or you know it's like saying that person bopped a gram on the head and they shouldn't be here okay fine that doesn't then validate the rights.

They're they're disgusting human being they have to go to trial and they have to prove the evidence right no bad guy get about here it's amazing.

The sinking of deena seems to be part of excess new policy of ignoring as he said stupid rules of engagement I honestly can't believe he said that I mean if there's any any justice in this world those exact statements will be used as an absolute nail final nail in the coffin to be like he just literally told you there was no rules of engagement that they were not going to do the right thing that they were going to punch them while they're down I mean all of these things mean the opposite of what these things are supposed to uphold.

And he says and it raises questions of what the Trump administration would say of course obviously always the right question to ask what they would say if a country like a Ron attacked an American ship exactly the same way.

Now they say if it was unarmed but either way you take the exact circumstances and you flip this around what do you think they would say I mean look this could be an identity exactly a fair fight a fair tape they would still make it out to be terrorism because they do every time and you know it you're not dumb whether you're honest about it or not that's different question.

Every one of you know what they do we all see it.

Now the statesman just to make you see you see it from here unarmed they said commenting on the incident strategic affairs expert Dr. Brah Brahma

Chandly raised questions about the nature of the strike arguing that if the ship was lightly armed or unarmed and quote the strike looks less like combat than pre-meditated execution like it's pretty sad guys that this is what they have to manufacture to give themselves an illusion of some kind of tact.

Or rather tactful you know some kind of strategic prowess like really like you're that much better than because you snuck up and use the guys of diplomacy on a possibly an armed ship and sunk the ship without even caring about arresting people that were there and the guys diplomacy.

You know what are these people there's videos all over these people you know yuck it up with the fellow people talking about they had their families their children you know when they just murdered everybody.

You know and look it's it's anyway it's it's almost not even the right it's clearly not the right path to try to speak humanity to some of these people I mean that seriously on all sides of partisanship because the dehumanization is sitting so severely.

But they are people they are human beings with families and dreams and lives but apparently if you listen to headsets the rest will they deserve to die.

But simultaneously somehow we're fighting for Iranians because that's not embarrassingly stupid.

Iran's ambassador to India Dr. Muhammad fatali also condemn the attack claiming the vessel was unarmed three people now when it was torpedoed by the US submarine.

Quote we will make sure that was I thought that was the other guy.

No, I'm sorry that's the same guy so continuing we will we will respond to the assassination very strongly the ship.

That was the one.

So you know what I'm sorry I just read the other article I forgot this was just the second the just to show you where it was written here we will respond with the assassination very strongly the ship was unarmed in a regular maneuver at sea.

So you know I mean these things obviously matter guys you know they mean especially with what ever like right now you're finding people in the Trump side screaming about them using cluster munitions so wait a minute are the rules or not.

Oh it only applies to you except here's an example of the US government buying cross munitions from Israel like 30 seconds ago you know it's it's infuriating that we have to be this dishonest.

Now on the school bombing same exact conversation here's a Trump just literally said and by the way the fact that they ask headsets behind him you can clearly tell bothered him and they're just lying to you even headsets pretended like it wasn't for like Trump's like it was a wrong right.

Randi fine it was a wrong Israel it was a wrong even headsets like well we're looking into it. I think about that here's what he says United States bomb a girls elementary school in southern Iran on the first day of the war in 175 people face to what I've seen that was done by Iran.

Is that true? Mr. Exxon or literally provably by everybody. I mean it's just so funny we even have to talk about that. Does anybody anywhere actually think that makes sense anybody other than people lying for the team no matter what said.

Are we unaware of all the hundreds of I mean literally if you do the math of the war on terror we're talking about tens of millions of innocent people that have been killed.

Look there's been reports about that my entire light look at it guys it's not a secret like from high level international entities that have done mass research about all the different locations of their war on terror bombings every time in Iraq every time in Syria every time in Somalia I'm right now I could bring up 16 reports showing you of Sudan Somalia tens of millions killed with the US bombing that they said we're dating and here we are.

I mean really it's just so crazy and the same thing Graham just said the rest of them but we don't do that you do though so I mean like every government is capable doing that that should be the real way to frame this and it's embarrassing that anybody would claim that you're somehow morally superior above we just wouldn't do that just embarrassing.

We think it was that we think it was that by Iran.

Very inaccurate as you know with their conditions.

That's why because they're in acting with you.

Okay well seeing a cell that's the case or rather despite him saying that like it's.

What is that?

What is that on my screen right there that's weird but you know the obvious reality here guys is the evidence is already been very clear.

Near I mean whether it's the reporting is from the air time wall street journal that just backup from US intelligence in his administration literally telling you that or all of the evidence by the way that also literally shows you that and so here.

On top of that are on as released a video which you should question.

Of the strike on the girl school a US Tom Hawk missile is clearly visible debunking the US blatant lie there also struck the same school 40 minutes later to murder those involved in the rescue effort doesn't that.

Some familiar guess that was just a double accident right and you I do I checked this like I do everything I talk about the AI thing says that it doesn't it's not AI which doesn't appear to be the image does show that it's been roundly shared and it does tie back I mean it's just pretty clear.

And that even if this wasn't there on top of everything else we already have the evidence.

I mean access literally posted the bombing map and a journalist in there in the press gaggle pointed like pinpointed on the map and I checked it is correct and it's right in the red spot of text sets own bombing map you know and then you got an Israeli guy that comes out and goes no it was the US don't even blame us literally shoving the blame on to them even though it was probably is real in the first place if you really want to I mean I don't I have no no.

I mean I would never claim that the US government would not target or that I would I would argue that they would do it deliberately if it was in their interest 100% but Israel seems to do it by design like like that like the US if it was somehow going to gain them something even though I don't think they care that it's more benign it's more like sociopathic where Israel's more psychopathic it's more about making punishing hurting amolec destroy them all and so I mind said is most likely this was something that was designed by what they've done look at what they didn't got.

Look at what they're doing everywhere but you can decide for yourself and so they're just telling you looks like it was wrong.

Here's my show if you want to listen to what we discussed on the 28th which I thought it was definitive at that point we have William Dar Maple posting this about CPAC and the head of CPAC says Iranian school goals are school girls are better dead than in a burka that's exactly how he said it the point ultimately is when asked about it right saying that you know well those girls are dead like basically saying that women in Iran are in a burka which remember that we're going to do that.

That's not the real picture of the way they frame that I've talked to many people who have traveled through Iran.

Robert for example has very very good contacts and insight I've interviewed Brian I forget his last name who literally backpacked through there and just a random guy.

I mean it and the evidence the same every single time.

I mean right now you can look up contacts and or rather accounts in Iran which you should question I agree but that will I mean wandering around Iran in normal western looking clothes and without a

hijab and in some places they do have them and are more strict but guess what that exists in Israel too as I've shown you a thousand times orthodox with Jewish women and many of the more orthodox locations like Zionist more so than anything are forced to wear head coverings.

Why is that not that why it's okay one not the other I guess only when they're brown.

I mean it's just embarrassing so the point about all that is to lie about it relentlessly like the nukes like everything else they lie about.

And I'm not even saying that there's not there's points that I would criticize around the way it's forced but not everywhere it's not a ubiquitous enforcement it's more specific to certain areas but.

That's for the Iranians to decide and as Robert points out relentlessly and I mean a good way that they have shown over the years that Iranians are literally with their protest not when the US gets involved.

You see change you see them literally have changed through their government it changes the way that things happen in their lives amazing how that works.

Now I wouldn't even argue that means that they're on their side I think governments are playing games with everybody but look at what we deal with once last time you had any real material change outside of narratives and wedge issues screaming back and forth and then removing things back and forth.

We are so obviously manipulated in this country so the point was well they have burkas they're forced to wear them and then the point was well they're dead man those children's girls are dead and essentially well if they were alive they be in burkas that's what he said.

So really like so it's more important like so basically didn't say it but that's what the insinuation was.

This is a radical guys that's what a extremist looks like the kind of person would rationalize the Jeff the death of children because they might be in a position that I think is we're like a religious or political dynamic that I disagree with.

Like what if they disagree with you does that matter not to these people.

Now here is Bolton trying to tell you I don't even know why this guy's even involved in the conversation anymore he should be in prison telling you that.

It's their fault for bombing the school because the school is too close and then I'll make the same point they made and even put her called it out.

Oh I'm sorry I didn't show the.

No that's weird that shouldn't have gone down actually.

I don't think I showed you anything all on me.

I don't think I think this was all I missed right or all you missed let me know if there was another tab or something I showed.

No I think that was it so there's the post anyway so here here is what I'll show you next and this is Bolton like I said.

But also reports that military investigators believe it is likely US forces responsible for a pound strike on an Iranian girl's school that killed schools of children on Saturday if that was the United States.

Can that be justified?

I don't think the United States in any conceivable circumstance would directly target a civilian structure like that.

You know aside from the hundred thousand times I can prove it happened though but aside from those.

If in fact it was an American weapon that did it it was because the weapon malfunctioned I'm sure we will try and make recompense and my advice to the Iranian.

Wasn't that a convenient or well could it malfunction right well they seem to malfunction half the time that that's pretty interesting in the future and anybody else is don't build girls schools right next to to naval bases.

Okay well let's address that.

You know it's what's really important understand is that Bolton knows what he just did right there right he knows very clearly because this is basic basic stuff.

And I showed you reports I showed you Matt I could show you plenty of things to prove the same point on the last two shows I think.

Here's what Maddie said there are over 160 public school situated in a military bases across the United States.

Same I didn't know was 160 but at the same point I made does John Bolton the warmongering war criminal think these are legitimate military targets now will based on his logic apparently so or at least that it'd be like well they shouldn't have been there.

Kind of their fault that foreign enemies are justified in killing us kids in the school US military base.

I mean there's very important points to be discussed around that most people don't seem to know.

The reality that not every even that this is what we were just discussing the day which I think it's going to be lost on most people that are all raw raw war right now which is that even in some cases targets that are appear military would not be based on circumstances or like with the ships for example we discussed or.

Politicians first military personnel they don't even distinguish right now they're assassinating everybody they're telling you the bomb the next person that gets put in place.

Undercomening that's what Israel just said even though Trump's been telling you they're going to support the guy if he ends up not being bad Israel's like no whoever it is we're bombing them right now they just said that.

That's a that's not a military person that's not that this is how they play this game now.

Has well the reality being you could point out very clearly that the United States and Israel have been doing that as far as I've ever been around ever they just go terrorist bad guy but same point I wouldn't be surprised if it run it does something similar I just that's not example that I can point to I wouldn't be surprised.

And so the reality ends up being that if this is where we are today it's quite obvious that the US government and that's what I was saying earlier about dragging the world into this situation has driven it to this point where you're now have them rationalizing in many cases like we discussed.

About that hotel bombing a location that they know there are personnel in but there's also civilians.

So based on Israel's logic that makes it a military target but not when Ron does it that's what the point was that I would still call that a crime because they knew they were civilians there.

It's so easy that is.

And so the reality ends up being that they pushed them into this position because I've never seen them doing this before after the US driving it but it could have happened that I haven't seen.

It's the same point every single time and so even Twitter says the DOD confirms they operate 161 schools in nine districts across foreign countries US states territories.

And there's John Bolton telling you that's bad news because they're liars guys these are bad people and I don't even know.

I'm sorry that I have to tell you this because this is just a graphic thing to put in your mind but is the reality.

Quote more than half the victims could not be identified through DNA testing due to the scale of the tragedy.

Iran's U.N. voice Arvani called the deadly school strike a war crime as poll show 56% of Americans opposed military action.

Donald Trump so badly obliterated the bodies of the little girls he bought the Iran that more than half of them couldn't be identified.

Now.

The other story that I think is important like I said is the idea of the conscientious object there and what's happening with this country.

Now the cradle reported on the seven US troops reportedly seeking ways to avoid taking part in US is real war on Iran.

Now the prominent act anti war activists as a growing number of US soldiers and their families are contacting his organization.

Now this is the center on conscience conscience and war which was briefly censored by Twitter.

And you know why I don't even need to get into it because there was no discernible reason and they were forced to bring them back because everybody create screamed about it.

But they censored them in the midst of this conversation because they're going you don't need to go to war here's the paperwork and Elon jumped in and shut that down.

Literally what happened aside from it being maybe Elon or somebody else the Twitter platform shut it down hashtag free speech.

And it says and then might prize their executive director of the center on conscience and war.

Said in a post on Twitter that is office they've been overwhelmed with requests for guidance from service members seeking to dodge deployment.

Quote phone has been ringing off the hook he wrote adding that many troops had been not told had been told the mission involved combat until they hadn't been told it had been involved combat to the last moment and were initially initially informed they were heading to training.

Prize nurse said he spoke with the mother of a soldier who was allowed to find one final call home before he turned his phone in had a deployment what was that what are you talking about.

According to an activist the soldier told his mother his unit would be going boots on the ground that night I was in the sixth and claimed his commander said the operation was meant to bring about the second coming of Christ all of this we verified.

Aside from what location you might be going to the reality of the religious war there was apparently a hundred and ten different reports at least last I checked from what three different units.

If I might be remember mr. Armory net number I think that's even more.

All saying that they're being told this is to bring on Armageddon.

I don't know why this is not the mean what how is the world is this not in the mainstream media you know why guys you know why this is a huge story and it would be unbelievably the whole world would be screaming about this if it came out through the corporate media that is real or rather whatever the driving forces that the US government is telling their personnel that they're fighting for Armageddon.

And yet nobody talks about that outside independent media you know why you know I don't even need to say it out loud I'm not talking about Jewish people we're talking about the reality of control over the conversation that comes from a foreign government and old and look just to cut to the chase because this is similar to what I'm going to show you next is directly from the source.

This is what my prizer put out.

Now he said this is directly from his post I just spoke with the number he's the executive director of center unconscious war he's been at he works with Abby more I believe you at least one point I don't know if it's still the reality but he was the partner of Ali Martin and filmmaker of Empire files and has been an activist and he was a veteran has been activist for a long time.

I just spoke with the mother of a service member in this unit they were given one last call home.

For turn their phones in which I'm not even sure is that how that works you don't get your phone I don't remember that ever be in the case as far as I've seen so it seems like they're controlling the flow of information which is crazy to me.

He told his mom they were going boots in the ground tonight now he said he also told us that his commander said that they were doing this to bring about the second coming of Christ now of all this that's the most obviously verified.

Hundreds of reports about that going to people complaining saying I this is crazy like like complaining like filing literal on the record complaints many most of the anonymous saying they're being told this and it's alarming to them.

He says I can also confirm that he did not tell them that this was a combat deployment until it was too late everyone was told they were going to training.

Think about this with the conversation of what we're being told about fighting for the purpose America first and fighting for the troops and you're tricking them.

Now it's not like they could just tell them in your force and you have to go anyway but you realize why would they do that why would the phones be taken.

In my opinion if this is all accurate because they know people don't want this and this is what we need to understand all the screaming everyone's 90% of Republican support that this is a drowningly desperate effort that everyone sees.

And most Americans I mean look you can go back as far as you want to look every war I've ever seen most of Americans don't want war and yet we're to believe now suddenly the one thing that they all didn't want now they all support guys we are being gaslit to a degree I've never seen and we all know where it's coming from.

Even Republicans know where it's coming from right now more than ever so tricking people he says not saying this is this confirms the US is invading which is different than just having boots right because they have all sorts like I said every which way you can look at it guys out.

Afghanistan Iraq Syria even when Trump said they were gone I proved you that they still had people in Afghanistan just that at least one soldier told their parent this was about this before losing all communication.

It says I was part of the build up in of two evasion in Iraq what I've heard today from troops and families is so reminiscent of February March 03 doesn't prove the US is invading but that they are definitely preparing to and we all I mean is it really even that hard to wrap your mind around Trump says it won't happen.

He said a lot of things and most of them ended up being the opposite of what he said pretty common from my perspective left or right but let's acknowledge that and here we are where he says no boots on the ground guess what.

They already said they might be with the ground Trump said that might have to happen no more forever wars but you know we have to fight forever sometimes okay.

It's just might have to be a it's a limited target of strike oh guess what it might go it's just embarrassing how many times they do that seconds later and we keep getting the narrative probably weighing many factors.

And our resistance is one of them so here's what I wrote just in we're either just I just brought it up to them people see in my audience saying that this is what's happening right that people should see this that they don't want to fight around for Israel.

And then a follow up from Mike his account or his platform or rather his he's the executive director of center on conscious and war suspended from Twitter.

They just suspended this for informing service members of their legal rights.

Now it came back the next day I believe or but this was the seventh and I believe no I think it was later that day I saw that it kind of it was actually or well then shared right here they're back up so we have no no this was today.

So 24 hours later after everybody screened and obviously called it out they brought it back why will apparently we don't know because they're cowards truth is I think we can all see that somebody out there.

I'm sure you could guess who might be driving that reality that's probably too likely culprits don't want people to know that they can say no.

Sort of like they don't want to know about jury notification or a number of things that actually give people power over the government wonder why and so they censored this hashtag free speech Elon right saving free speech.

Unless it challenges Israel's agenda.

So I think this is monumentally important because it demonstrates where we're at that most people don't and we're going to get far more into this.

That most people in this country are very unhappy with what's happening and I think we can prove that and I think the government is drowning in that because.

We are coming to a point where we can see clearly the line between what they want us to think and what they're actually doing.

And then when we stand back and look at that it's very easy to see who is driving that agenda.

And it's not America first guys I'll tell you that right now.

Now as Mark aims points out it's cliche by now to point out what a complete fraud Elon was with this.

With his discussion about free speech laughed up by so many falling hacks instead we're getting a censorship on a scale we've never imagined as the Israel back Trump regime war degenerates.

Now I agree with that entirely we've just had such a long gap between whatever we thought was happening under Jack whatever that really was.

To now now if we actually had some way to like tap back into that yeah there was clearly censorship but guys it has never been like what I'm seeing now.

I've said that for a long time like it from my perspective the suppression and it's not all just Blake and sent blatant blanket censorship it's algorithmic manipulation and censorship and control to a degree I've never seen.

Add is really bots set authentic which we'll get into in a second is obvious.

That was just redundant I think I actually grabbed that twice.

So here is another veteran same conversation speaking about this exact point and trying to make sure people know that now is the time to stand up if you care about your integrity principles right what you the honor what you actually thought you were fighting for.

Today one of our members received a message offering a thirty thousand dollar bonus to come back in yeah and that's obvious too right that's not what you do when you're spending billions on war when you have enough people to fight.

So we here we need to get the message out to all those who are not yet deployed now is the time to resist if you joined up for values of honor courage and commitment if you joined up to defend your communities now is the time to defend your communities by refusing this illegal and immoral war.

I mean there's narrative sure plenty of you know coined token responses that are supposed to say when people tell you it's illegal.

But it's obvious I mean it's you can pretend you can you can play the nuance game and act like this you know they haven't done it in however many years it's still obvious.

I mean you can literally ask rock point blank and they'll say yep that's illegal not like that proves it and shouldn't because rock it's manipulated lies all the time it gets things wrong.

But it's a platform that is manipulated by somebody who's trying to lie for your side and it still tells you that this is illegal objectively.

You know that's the weird thing about all this is just there's this weird pocket of just narrative screaming lies that seem to have a lot of influence because they're all like 10 billion influencer counts but it's like a fraction of the people of the conversation it's incredible

and I think that's how this has been set up to get this loud vocal screaming thing that they pretend is the entire conversation when it's very clearly not and then just kind of algorithmically box things out I think this is obvious right now.

I think it's clear that people are in droves starting to change sides about this sides from just you know good like supporting what all of our governments doing or not.

Now here is the same account center on conscious and war saying you can preemptively register as a conscientious object or if you are worried about being drafted to do so you register for the service select service and write I am a CEO when you do so.

But when you do so for extra protection you can also do the CEO application and send it to us to keep on file for you because I'm pretty sure the this government wouldn't care.

Now here's it's funny to me unfortunately I don't know if you knew who was sharing or not but this is the ridiculous clowns to Peters who quoted them I'm saying Trump might institute draft when they literally didn't say that but she said the usual statement which is we don't count anything out and it's possible.

Very different is it not now I agree it's obviously might but that's not what they said and using quotes it gives a very clear impression typical stupiders nonsense to try to trick people into thinking that that's something that's a bombshell

when you listen to it they simply go well we might we have but it's possible we won't cut anything out and when they do that that's 50 50 as far as I'm concerned might might not depends on the reality.

But I want you to hear not from stupiders lying about it with the reality that she's saying that a draft is on the table it's possible might happen which it always has been it's never gone away but that they're even talking about it says something.

Candace Owens as an interesting angle to this or rather just a point to bring into it as what she said got a weird response or rather the obviously just there are either expected response from the people we're talking about.

So she wrote do not join or remain in the United States military.

Trump has betrayed America and expects you to die for Israel remember remember keep keep telling us out there that not everyone sees this and all these from Smith Smith and Tucker and Candace and every entire entirety of the real Charlie Kirk audience like you guys we see you.

So there is no honor in being led by dishonorable men to your death well said.

Now this person says yes it is a legal illegal.

What about free speech again guys what about what's going on Candace Owens just publicly broadcasted this cancer across X.

This cancer her opinion about not joining a illegitimate situation now you could be she could be wrong right but when did it start happening where your opinion if disagreeing with one side was suddenly well I think why about 2016 forward not even remotely implying Trump alone but that was an interesting spin.

Where all of a sudden we just gotten this crazy the other side was no longer the difference of opinion it was the terrorist enemy to have to fight because they always had designed to turn this back in in fact it was always pointed at us when you understand it.

But now it's just on its face we the domestic terrorism focus the whole thing there's telling you it's illegal to say don't join the military because bad.

No it's not I mean just because they want to go you can't say this out loud that's the kind of authoritarian thing we're all fighting right they can just dean you can't wear this color shirt because I don't like it that day well that's where we're going the military is a problem and it's because what they're doing is illegal and if you can't handle that being pointed out then I understand where I know where you're coming from in a sense of where it's driving you.

And Bill Ackman repost this.

And she says since black men is retweeting that it is against the law for me to tell Americans not to sign up for the military I would like to publicly invite him onto my podcast which he won't do to offer a convincing argument as to why American should send their children to die for Israel we can't pick up we can pick up or Charlie Kirk left off.

Now I honestly I didn't even look into whether or not it's on the book somewhere illegal for you to say that because I don't care whether it is or not because that's insane to me the idea that the in a violence.

You know a violent focused force is going to say that you're not allowed to criticize our violence otherwise we'll put you in a cell it's like it's insane guys free speech like everything else we talk about.

Before we ever got to this point shall not be infringed there is no point that which they can go accept if you say the thing about us that we don't like that's not how that works with their government military or anything.

We just got to get back to basics guys fire in a theater the whole thing throw it all back it's about to the core point you can say whatever you want whenever you want no matter what that's called free speech.

I mean look I'm open to a conversation about people that want to disagree I even understand like I said about the logic of fire in a theater the whole thing but I see how it's been abused ever since.

My point is that should be the fault of the people that decide to irrationally act based on some random person screaming something end of the day this is them trying to stop you from being able to talk about what's going on as an American in a place on a platform all of which they tell you is free speech all free speech fighting for freedom but shut up because you're going to go to jail.

You got to love how crazy this is right now in an entertaining sense even though it's so terrifying so she says Zionists are having a meltdown about what I said yesterday so let me reiterate do not sign up for or.

For or continue to fight for the US military now here's an interesting additional point and I would still I stand 100% by what I said no matter what she says seriously because that's the point free speech and we have a right to criticize actions are different actions are where if she was out there physically trying to do something that broke the law will you could argue that's a crime my point is from their perspective you could start to bake a nuance to say well now she saying.

If you're already committed no longer fight I still stand by what I said but I argue they're going to make a bigger case about her trying to convince standing military personnel to with to ignore their commitments and the roads.

You see my point that's interesting but she could but I still this matter still free speech this war is on behalf of satanic pedophile she writes find the legal means to exit the military you not fight for child rapist now it's these things like that whether you agree with that or not.

It's a crazy statement which I'm not saying doesn't exist what I'm saying is that they very broad statement about the war is on behalf of I mean to me that's the kind of thing that's an Alex Jones level thing whether true or not in some sense it's used in order to make it look crazy or made made broad in order to make it.

Ignorable by people who would otherwise be interested.

Not you you may think I'm crazy and disagree I'm just saying I think that's interesting that that's the statement you would make sure that exists clearly you know if you I mean are there pedophiles yes.

Are there people who believe in Satan is yes 100% are there people that practice both clearly are they in our government in some cases I would argue I can see that the point is is it the vast majority right you could decide I don't think so.

I think there's a level of this that has a plan but you have to understand that this is something that is used to get the average person you might be beginning to understand like the basics of this you know the illegalities of the war and the fact of the war was done illegally and you jump to say 10 pedophiles they're going to go whoa okay I'm you're I'm going to ignore from now on all the important things she might say.

Think about that for a second Daniel says here's where you go so good for him stand by this guy is they have a right to point this out and military have a right to know their rights.

Now in Israel same point her it's I protested the Iran war Israeli police beat arrested and strip search me says this Jewish person in Israel because it's all about Zionism guys and you're not allowed to stand up against Zionism wars.

You can read it for yourself it's no different this is not new either but people just pretend they don't know what's going on in these countries.

Now here's a clip I'll play just a couple quick parts of the beginning really from John Merchheimer telling you there's no question a nuclear armed Iran would being stability to the region.

Interesting point even though I obviously there's logic to it the way frames and I find interesting because this is an older clip because it's I'll just tell you right now what he says is that nuclear weapons are actually a peace tool.

From because of the turns and it's like okay well maybe that's changing today or is because of their clear direction of tactical nukes and Trump's effort to make them usable which blows my mind I've been saying that for its census first administration he's the one that drove that forward guys.

But overall maybe even before that you could argue there is some launch there right that that was the way they were designed at least how after the fact is that well it's about to turn and we have nobody wants to use them so if we have them okay it's a point there.

I just don't agree with there I mean with people like the extremist Zionist religious cult that we can see driving this I think that changes the conversation about that right but nonetheless here we had to say.

I think there's no question that a nuclear armed Iran would bring stability to the region because nuclear weapons are weapons of peace their weapon.

Okay right that was what it was weapons of peace that's a little bit far for me right like the idea weapons of peace but they're destructive.

But I can't what he's saying though I just think that's important to think about like maybe use a different word at the end of the day it could ultimately if there was no irrational units out there and that's pretty much the groups that were claimed to be fighting for freedom out there.

That this might make sense.

They have hardly any offensive capability at all and if Iran had sorry one more stop is that's that's I think that was the main point is that the logic is well there is no offensive purpose because once you use it not only is that going to set off a response that causes more chaos like nuclear style but that it's so widely

this devastating and there's no real like tactical use it's just like a massive destruction point that then like that ends up being that there's real no offensive use it's really just holding them as a deterrent for other use.

So there's like I said there's logic there but at the same point a nuclear deterrent there's no way that the United States or Israel for that matter would be threatening to attack Iran now.

In the same way that if Saddam had had nuclear weapons in 2003 the United States would not have invaded Iraq and if Libya had nuclear weapons in 2011 the United States would not have gone to war against Libya.

So I think that if you had a Middle East where other states besides Israel and this of course includes Iran had a nuclear deterrent it would be a more peaceful region.

Well it's possible to be some proliferation I wouldn't bet against the fact that maybe Turkey or Saudi Arabia would acquire nuclear weapons but people have been predicting widespread proliferation for decades now and it's never happened.

But I think there are two reasons that it wouldn't happen one is that the Iranians would not be able to blackmail anybody in the neighborhood with their nuclear weapons.

We've created this myth in this country over the past few years in talking about Iran that any country that requires nuclear weapons can blackmail other countries or use those nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.

We have a lot of theory and a huge amount of empirical evidence 67 years now would show that no country with nuclear weapons can blackmail another country as long as somebody is protecting that country or it has its own nuclear weapons.

I mean that's a fair point. You know this is the thing we make talk about like I think it was a Tucker who took her made the point appears about the Shiite attacks zero right.

Whatever you want to claim and you could still be right that they're just they're evil and we just because of this and that that hasn't been allowed to happen okay possible it's also just as likely or possible that you're wrong and the reality he said was right.

So the point is that we have this body of evidence 67 years where well that hasn't happened nobody has and there are some lunatics out there or even the idea of that loan crazy man who I build one somewhere and use it or some terrorist in the tunnel might build one so okay possible right.

Adding to the point is always I know people out there want me to say this and I don't disagree that it's possible that there's an argument that nuclear weapons don't exist or that the power is not what they claim it is.

It's always worth considering that I don't agree with that I think the evidence claims the other way but it's worth considering the point being.

That where nothing's happened there hasn't been any any you know not not in the sense that he's discussing.

So doesn't that mean more than screaming rhetoric from people that we've seen lie like just like the press conference right before that and every everything that ever said my entire life.

Being hyperbolic on purpose but clearly they lie a lot you know like that has to matter like that seems to be empirical evidence like he said we got to get away from listening to politicians in any sense.

And this leads to the second reason the United States is going to extend its nuclear umbrella over Saudi Arabia and over Turkey the way it extended it over Germany and Japan during the cold war and we will make it perfectly clear to the Iranians that they cannot blackmail anybody.

And by the way to clarify what I said there obviously what I mean is like you know listen consider what they're saying like consider everything from anybody question at all right.

But what I mean is people who are taking what politicians say is gospel right like Trump says it therefore that's the reality I don't know why anybody has ever gotten there even if you believe everything he's saying is true he could be wrong he could be misled it's always the same point.

So there'll be no great incentive for Turkey or for Saudi Arabia to acquire nuclear weapons.

And as you know when you're involved in context sports it can be very dangerous and so they live in a dangerous world and on top of that nuclear weapons are the ultimate deterrent right it doesn't get any better than nuclear weapons.

And of course this is why states pursue nuclear weapons I believe that if Iran had nuclear weapons the United States and Israel would not be threatening to attack Iran you don't attack.

This is the point that we're making the entire time in fact not just that that itself makes the point but look at the rest of their actions like in every way it shows that they wouldn't do this if they had them.

They would be acting differently right the fact is and that's why all the evidence need to be they're almost there they're building that because if they did they wouldn't even be attacking.

Right so in and of itself when you break it down and I made this in much better you know fleshed out data based arguments I'm just backing up what he said and I think a lot show before last I think was the one just about the reality of that I had like three different points we made about how look at what they just did read look what they said and it clearly shows.

That ultimately they're aware that that's not that but they need the argument that it's there to justify the attack but the attacks only happening because they actually know that they're not.

And that's backed up by Gabbard is backed up by the previous units backed up by intelligence general is backed up by the IEA is backed up by the international atomic energy agency by all.

Apparently apparently what cough saying things out loud is enough to give people to ignore all the evidence because just like I said that's how a lot of partisanship works.

Entry that has nuclear weapons and put it survival at risk so I think if Iran were to get nuclear weapons the United States and Israel would back off and stop threatening them.

Then there's always the case of Libya you remember Colonel Gaddafi we told Colonel Gaddafi that if he gave up his nuclear weapons program his weapons of mass destruction programs that we would leave them alone.

You know what happened to Colonel Gaddafi he's now six feet under and we help put him six feet under in case you don't remember the point is that they he complied right and then they killed him.

It's quite simple and then that's why we pointed in the past when they go with that I don't even know I think I don't know if they thought this was smart or I was just clumsy politics but they said we'll talk about the given the Libya model.

Now it could be taken as a threat I think that probably was what the point was but that didn't make sense with the idea that they wanted this to happen maybe they never did the end of the day.

Libyan model is trick them into getting rid of them and then kill them.

That's a lesson for everybody in the world whether bad day or not you do what they say the real point is whether about nuclear missiles weapons or not like US government has roundly shown throughout its own history that it does not hold anything sacred like in a broad sense administration administration they will sabotage with that backstab they will ignore UN resolutions agreements treaties everything as long as it's in their interest.

They'll just go wow bad thing terrorists we don't agree they broke it whatever and just move forward they've done it my entire life so is Israel right now they're violating like many different UN resolutions while they often point to them to just to claim around this or that or they should have followed this one it's just hypocritical across the board I mean there's more to play but I'll leave it there.

So into the conversation of the great reset Lindsey Graham Trump Republican style.

The point of those is just to you know I mean the reality of where we are I just think is I'm actually going to hope it will we might not get to today depending on time but the end part I had today was a bunch of just.

Stuff that you can't just the compilations of the contradictions I've just it's very very hard to ignore right now this is Lindsey Graham seemingly coming out and saying that you know I don't know if you want to call the quiet part out loud just.

In regard to what the Trump administration rather specifically Trump has been promising his own people from 2024 everything he's talking about here contradicts all of that or rather all of every point here contradicts things he said in that conversation.

And yet people go yay you know shield of America let's make a new forever war against South America which is already starting will toy into show you in a second and all the people that said no forever war is no regime change no war with a runner like yay war with a run regime change go after South America forever I mean it's and look for yourself.

It's pretty crazy and that's why I really want you to think right there it's like okay well that's that can't exist in an organic scenario so that means this weird fake conversation with which all of them know we're seeing them.

Do that because look at the comments it's like every other comments like ridiculous this is you now that you know that hold that this you account much of this what you said then this what you're saying now it's all over the place and they just keep doing it.

This is about an illusion of what's happening I don't even think those people care truly about anything you're saying.

Here's Lindsey Graham telling you that all of this everything we're discussing is about resetting the world or at least that's what Trump's doing and you know I believe that's what's happening to a very real degree and the great reset is one element of all of this.

The network state agenda the freedom cities conversations CEO run countries like all of this even the international law point the Palantir surveillance everything they're doing changing the dynamics of international law changing our relationship with the Constitution all of this is dragging us into this new scenario.

Donald Trump's new WHO proposal his new board of peace the global dynamic is as the UN called it a security council adjacent entity.

These are globalist talks guys that's what those are he introduced it at the U.M. he introduced it at the dog was meeting those are both global discussions.

Think about a stupid this is for people like Jones to act like this is not exactly what's happening.

And here's Lindsey Graham straight up telling you that looking for fair fight if we get in a fight I want to win it I want to win it quick okay just to start out with that ridiculous point because it seems that too is what they're trying to change right apparently it's somehow a week to care about honor and integrity because bad guy around.

It doesn't matter what the other side is it's about you that matters right just matter whether the worst terrorist in the world what you do matters about who you are.

So to claim they're bad we do it to means you're just as bad as that I say that a thousand times of doing this.

Just like headsets we don't want to fair or rather a punch them while they're down these are all very clear sentiments it means you're a coward it means you are a manipulator means you don't hold anything sacred means you don't have any respect for anybody.

To say you don't want to fair fight I mean that's that in another way of saying that means we'll break the law right.

I mean it's crazy that you have people that are going yeah yeah get them tell them you know if around find out like these are children in the conversation and they seem to be the ones getting all you know like literally being lifted up into this so the world one thinks we're all about stupid and these people get the illusion of somehow support I just.

Flatly do not think this country is dumb as they believe it is or they want you to think it is.

Looking for a fair fight if we get in a fight I want to win it I want to win it quick I'm sorry one more thing on that too that means that you so you're weak right so.

Some of you strong who has the best military in the world has no sense you don't worry about a wrong that we let's stand up step in the ring let's do it right.

No no when you don't want to fair fight you want to win that means you're coward that means you want to secretly manipulate because you can't win otherwise that's what we think is happening.

See this hat free Cuba stay tuned the liberation of Cuba is upon us oh look at that okay hashtag winning right another war coming on guys no more wars peace president it's just a matter of time now you see this that make a run great.

Trump said the only way to make a run great is for the people to take over okay okay interesting well make a run great.

Yeah you know what it's a point you should ask maybe you want that right.

Maybe you want.

Iran to be great again.

Maybe you also want America to be great again right that's okay you could want both those things clearly you can want both those things but you can't have both of them first.

See that matters doesn't it so is it a run first or is America first.

Right okay well if you're making America great again.

And Iran great again I guess you could do them simultaneously but is that what you want as Republicans do you want do you want half America first half or not you want America first right well you get the point that's not even really what's happening.

I think the reality for most conservatives that's setting in really alarmingly right now but.

Let's just move that point aside no more wars okay well Cuba Cuba bad okay well wait we're going to get to the cartels in Mexico which apparently is already kicking off.

With no one at the helm apparently which is insanely alarming even like what the word I was looking for yesterday was was failing up is what they keep doing.

No one gets destroyed gets proven to be a literal like profiteer criminal whatever you also recall she's doing gets exposed to being the most embarrassingly stupid person in the conversation nobody believes she has any.

Actual ability and yet she gets put into a position where she somehow controlling at least as it peers I kind of doubt that the reality Rubio whatever else a new international like global control dynamic.

It's insane guys it's absolutely insane but Cuba and the rest and raw all this is more wars all this is not a piece president but do I even say it probably not.

We're marching through the world we're cleaning out the bad guys were yeah marching through the world cleaning out the bad guys.

America first right you're going to get the ridiculous children out there they're going to try to contort that into well we have to do that first before we get this because it's always the thing he's doing that's the thing for that lead to the we do that first and then we'll get the thing okay cool.

You tell me when that happened you ring your bell and I'll come running you know it's just not I don't see it happening.

Understand that marching around the world and getting rid of the bad guy who decides who's bad who decides which ones get removed I guess apparently is real.

And we'll get to the eugenics part by the way because that's very similar to what we're hearing about getting rid of this bad one percent of people because that's just how you make society's great apparently it's the crime gene.

I'm not kidding that's even Miller.

I have relationships with new people that will make us prosperous and say I've never seen anybody like it.

This is Ronald Reagan plus Donald Trump is resetting the world and away nobody could have dreamed of a year ago.

Plus Donald Trump is resetting the world.

Trump is resetting the world.

Trump is resetting the world and away nobody could have dreamed of a year ago.

Nobody could have dreamed of a year ago you know other than plush what he is the greatest commander in chief of all time our military is the best of all time our one is going down and Cuba is next.

God what a clown.

Right I mean on top of the fact that it's just like you know it's just screams weakness when clearly you're not sitting good right now.

There's a lot of problems we'll get into munitions if we have time today and the reality of all this if not tomorrow.

I'm planning to do a show tomorrow we'll get into all the rest of this stuff.

Hopefully as soon as early as I can.

But you know it's you're not doing I mean I'm not going to say you're losing because I don't know I'm not going to be like the rest of these partisans that dab.

But there were we're winning entirely in the US has never been stronger or the other side going around killing everybody in the US has never been weaker.

Well probably somewhere in the middle.

Right I mean genuinely like that's always tends to be the case now I'll give you some thoughts when we get there about which way I say this leaning.

And I don't think the US is doing as well as is claiming but I have no real way to know the reality on the ground of Iran so it's hard to know.

That's what I mean it's like somewhere in the middle but so what I mean in that sense is that I can see how the US is having some failures they're trying to hide.

But that doesn't always mean that they're losing in response to what the is Iran may have just as many problems and what they're dealing with.

It's it's important to question this stuff but my point though is that what we can see with the discussion of the like the discussion of bringing them all together to trip quadruple manufacturing and what that clearly shows you.

Or the fact that they're already getting locations completely designated they claim weren't or they cut her billion dollars surveillance system that even Doug Douglas McGregor told you they kill you say they took out their eyes.

On top of that you can go on forever the point is it's pretty clear that they're they're struggling in a lot of ways and trying to make it look like they're not and so to come out and do this we're stronger than ever is the best thing ever we're so strong we're beating everybody.

It just screams weakness it's like 2008 the day before going we've never been stronger I've never seen a financial economy stronger than ever and then everything classes.

That's what their job is that's what these people do and they may not even know like that idiot on the economic show that maybe no idea and then collapse you know it's.

But I tend to think they know more than they think or more than they let on but I don't think people like this are truly in the know what the larger conversation is some of them.

I don't know which you know Graham might be up there but most Congress is my point I don't think most these people are truly in the know what's going on.

But as you know just the bullet points reset in the world looking not looking for a fair fight marching through the world and cleaning out the bad guys Cuba's next hashtag winning great reset peace president.

How crazy right how embarrassing oh no forget by the way Donald Trump is endorsed him.

All these arguments about all the things and all the bad stuff will Trump's already endorsed Lindsey Graham for twenty twenty six and he's absolutely do everything he can including apparently flying to Kentucky to fight against on a messy.

Which is just it speaks for itself guys.

Republicans before this were told you told you Graham was the bad guy Mike Mike Johnson's bad guy they're rhinos right we want messy and all them and now we're here no messy bad guy to the dishonest ones.

Trump is society with the people who have no interest in anything he promised you before in fact the exact opposite same point every time.

Now here's what he said about Lindsey Graham in twenty nineteen never fails.

Lindsey Graham just said of your remarks that you made in the Oval Office that if you keep talking like that quote this will be a disaster worse than Obama's decision to leave a rack.

So Lindsey Graham would like to stay in the Middle East for the next thousand years with thousands of soldiers and fighting other people's wars.

I want to get out of the Middle East oops.

Well see you could look at this two ways.

Here he actually thought like that until Israel compromised him or whatever you want to talk about think whatever you think happened.

Or this is just him lashing out because Lindsey Graham said something he didn't like which both of those perfectly line up with exactly who this man at this petty person is.

He just screamed things that challenge what he was saying yesterday because somebody poked him in the eye and he just lashes out right or each of them hating each other before they're now in the unity team and everyone stronger than ever now know you're fired you know and apparently bondy might be next you know surprise me.

Rumble links like I said cash bondy known those seem to be the most obvious standout stupidity in the conversation so when surprise me.

So here is just case you want to see it on you know Trump already said this you guys know this but it's just keep it in the conversation Trump claims Cuba is at the end of the line that was seventh.

I think it was a six put support on the seventh now here he is and his new press briefing for the shield of America which quite literally looks like Avengers.

I'm not even kidding when somebody said that they probably got that off an Avengers movie I think it's funny.

But now that he will look at this logo I mean God these people are ridiculous Trump's warrants of eminent action against Cuba at his shield of America's summit.

Are we still pretending a piece president no new wars we are we are we just moving on from that now we're at the narrative of well we had to because X and Y and Z okay fine still that the new wars though right we're on that same page no it's not a war it's an operation okay good times.

Well here's Mr Nick Ridiculous he says President Trump tells Latin America leaders that we will start treating cartel terrorist as ISIS you know the ISIS that they are unfounded work with in Israel does as well.

Just as we form the coalition to eradicate ISIS in the Middle East we must now form the coalition to eradicate cartels you know the ISIS that they just said bomb something like two days ago but eradicated sort of like he obliterated something that the other one at the bomb again tomorrow I guess he doesn't know his words very well.

But overall a coalition to eradicate ISIS what was that called again guys wasn't that oh that's right the war on terror that apparently is even though they claim it's still going because they're still using the things they claim under that.

That's what's called a forever war that's literally guys what created the terms for forever for forever war okay just so that's clear so this guy who literally screamed all year about why forever wars we're going to stop is now telling you this new forever war is the best thing since sliced bread.

That's what I said down here I knew forever war this is what you voted for right Nick.

Apparently also here here a little play that clip real quick and you can hear we said then I'll give you some thoughts on the cartel.

We formed a coalition to eradicate ISIS to the Middle East we must now do the same thing to eradicate the cartels at home.

I guess net yeah I wrote that for him I'm laughing about how these days how he's almost all it seems like he's reading off of something all the time he never used to really do that as much.

It's always big about off the cuff you know but I know that's it's we who's writing these things it seems like it's just funny good question I think even though just sound is probably somebody in his team it's well it's interesting I think that what he's discussing here is a very flagrant challenge to what he ever told you was going to do that's why question those things.

So obviously that's a forever war I mean that's what that is that's literally a gain a global entity that is aimed at stopping something that they define however they want to.

They'll go on for as long as they want to which will lead to occupations of countries in at least in a financial sense or in some kind of a re or literal on the ground or quite literally dealing with the like the Delci Rodriguez point the oil they're already taking.

This is nothing new guys this is just the recontinuation rather Trump putting a fine point and a label on exactly what they've already been doing.

And I mean I know okay we're fighting the cartels are we really going to play this game again I just don't include this clip that the Jason made for our show.

Where we discussed this I think it's entitled.

The episode was entitled Trump's new two billion dollar WHO FDA walks back food.

So I forget about that and the buried of all this conversation they literally lied about everything they're doing and US governments long documented cartel connections yeah wasn't there.

And it's a good clip it's about 2012 minutes and I mean guys these are you can go through this for yourself and I hope you will but it's more than this there's so many examples.

So many examples of the US government getting caught I mean here watch the clip and Israel getting caught training cartel members it's incredible how much we have on this stuff.

That's the one that I just the most recent that I show every time it's just this was from 2025 the wiretap the DEA laundered 19 million dollars of cartel drug money into cash and crypto.

First I don't think anybody of substance actually got in trouble.

Yeah we're fighting those cartels so whatever that means that that means you know whatever they don't like in that area you know whatever they want to claim cartels are while working with them in every discernible way or working.

Fight MS 13 but here they go send them back to you bouquets lay have a good time.

Trump's golden dome on top of all that could cost one trillion dollars to shield America for missiles golden dome one trillion dollars all of this is the same kind of thing guys now the shield of America is a coalition to stop the you know I guess the whatever they claim they're fighting out of the guys

that fighting cartels in regard to like the you know the their hemisphere right.

This is the overlap in regard to whatever we're talking about from like a electronic sense but this is just the United States arguably I guess maybe.

Can you know whatever they include but you know that I'm thinking the idea about the technique idea and so overall one trillion dollars on top of everything else.

This is just a nonstop we talked about this already just to include this in your mind about all these things every one of these are challenges to what we're promised.

Now here is them clapping about signing this alongside all of these different countries that at one point they would have called banana republics but you know it's all good because they like what I had to say that day now they're the democracies right.

By stroke of a pen Eric doubter D says and flank by many Latin American heads of state president Trump forms the shield America's coalition and initiative that will decimate the cartels and Narco terrorists in our hemisphere except the ones you work with though.

Trump only Trump could pull this off same thing.

Man these are people that we're screening about now more forever wars and this is the beginning of just a new hemisphere focused war on terror whatever they want to call it.

Let's not forget their mashing together cartel terrorism drug lord whatever Narco terrorism with the same thing that's right there.

So war on terror Narco style whatever you want to call it or whatever they want to broaden that out to.

So guess what it's already started.

Let's make sense of that okay so they literally just sign this paper boom and we're already bomb and things.

So case you're not that smart that means they already started before they sign that thing and all it really comes down to is that they're ultimately doing this regardless of whether they gave you that real play signing dynamic.

This is them continuing the bombings they were already doing.

A fisherman that they claim we're doing something wrong or people who were moving drugs and boats and international waters that they have no legal right to bomb or that they didn't actually care to look and found out they were people who were.

I mean we talked we talked about this when it was happening extensively and it never really stopped but the first many examples were undeniable guys.

So here's exit or never as account at the commentary account but here's the south command on March 8th the direction of Southcom.

Southern spear conducted a lethal connect strike on a vessel operating in designated terrorist organizations.

So what's the what what are you the signing of all this and creating all this dynamic that guy this is about some kind of legal cover in my mind.

These are terrorism terrorist acts.

Now I'll top of all of it here's Graham is going to tell you you know what's really all about.

I'm kind of joking but here's the point this regime goes down we're going to have a new mid east we're going to make a ton of money nobody will threaten the streets of hormones again but.

Yeah just casually include you know we'll make a lot of money I'm sure that's not what it's all about to some of them.

Profiting off of the destruction of a country you know that's typical that's you good old classic us foreign policy.

Now in a larger sense about re imagine a rather resetting the world I mean how else do you see this how else do you see with the multiple folks some multiple this is a world dynamic right now this is not a regional thing this goes around the world guys and what he's doing with Israel guiding his hand or rather the other way around is quite literally.

War of aggression for control for a global entity.

I don't know why we can't acknowledge this out loud I mean you can't build a global international order called the board of peace which is supposed to be about peace while you conduct war everywhere and not call yourself a globalist with a logo that's quite literally the technique of the global map you also have plenty of examples of how their agenda has been clear from day one.

Elon Musk I mean all of this these people are I mean Larry think you can't pretend like this is not exactly.

What we were criticizing right before.

Introducing these things at Davos and the UN I think makes all the difference W H O proposals the entire network state discussion.

Now the black rock discussion I think is a good point to add to this because of response here as well but Chebo says two of the world's largest funds are limiting the amount you can withdraw.

Black rock froze requests for withdrawals of 1.2 billion dollars from its private credit fund investors in black rock fund with assets of 26 billion requested the withdrawal of 9.3 funds 9.3% funds.

Black rock refused limiting withdrawals to 5% the black rock funds with fund with assets of 82 billion.

Recording a record number of requests for withdrawals in the same week.

Blackstone had to invest 400 million of its own funds to cover these costs of withdrawals similar problems exist with blue L O B D C to fund where withdrawals have been suspended.

What do they see coming? Black rock limits redemptions of private credit funds.

Well this is interesting. This person says black rock part of the globalist movement.

Yeah, I agree. Defeated. Why? Because this meme said so. Look at that cool meme with Trump and flying ego on a flag and totally just knocking down the dominoes of the world economic forum.

Even though we spoke there as a part of it produced his new plan there. They assigned on to it and he's going to go next year.

You know, yeah, he shut it all down because he said pronouns are bad and and let Nick said globalism is bad than the introduces this new globalist plan.

This is embarrassing that we even pretend like this makes sense guys. Okay, black rock right part of the globalist movement, but it's been defeated. She says well, then let me know why Larry Fink is part of Trump's inner circle.

We can't be this dumb guys. We can't fall for people out there, which are probably bots trying to convince everybody that everything's going the way you wanted to just go back to sleep.

Stop looking. Don't man the mind behind the curtain. Don't mind the man behind the curtain. It's always the same.

That's everywhere. I always though. I'm pretty convinced that most people see it. Now the ideology driving a lot of this. I don't think it's ever really gone away guys. And this is a crazy thing to me. This stems from Stephen Miller.

Stephen Miller surprise surprise. This guy is a supremacist extremist in every possible way. He makes that very clear.

Stephen Miller is right. This person says the high culture that made the West so superior to everywhere else on earth. Clearly a subjective opinion only came because Western Europe executed 1% of each generation for centuries.

Oh, that that's all that's simple. Execute the ones you don't like. That seems like a quick quick path to the best possible society.

I mean, who ever take who takes these people seriously, pseudo intellectuals. That's you in reading, weeding the crime gene.

That's even Miller. Now this is this is Wilton or is discussing it, but that's what he is discussing the crime gene.

Out of the population through centuries of capital punishment for everything from larceny to murder Western Europe made itself a paradise.

Oh, did it. And blossom into the greatest high civilization. The world was ever seen over 18 19 centuries. Well, even that could be debated.

Like, I'm sure Westerners think that. Right. You can talk to people that live in different styles of life that don't maybe don't want all the things you thought were made your life happy.

It's just a perspective thing and I hate the supremacist mindset of the way we view the world today.

So he says, quote, the West only achieved the place that it did in human history because it spent previous centuries eradicating the criminal elements within his territories.

Well, who gets to decide that? What we know what's a crime to you apparently saying Israel's bad is a crime to Miller.

The West that we came to know that had the great music and architecture and science and most powerful economy and spent centuries previous to that establishing order first and order means killing 1% of your population that you don't agree with.

That's 100% true. High civilization requires order and what it was high civilization requires the pruning of the tree of civilization to achieve it.

I don't know if you realize it, but this is terrifying logic or rather rhetoric.

Now, you could just call it Nazi if you want, but not seeming the Nazi party.

This, but this is the same kind of vibe guys. This is supremacist eugenics.

That's what this literally is by definition.

Peter St. Owen's PhD responding to Will says you don't get social peace unless you're willing to permanently eradicate or eliminate the worst 1% of society.

Okay. Well, I disagree, you know, that killing 1% of billions of people is pretty insane.

Personally, whether or not you decide they're bad and how exactly do you get to some kind of an objective ruling on who those bad people are?

I guess the elitist decide for you. How else does that work? Right? Right? Mark industry.

Andreessen, right? Peter teal, right? Elon Musk, right? Everybody else in the lead of circles left or right? Yes, that's correct.

They pick for you because they know better.

And Elon Musk agrees.

Yep, that's right. That's correct. That's terrifying to me.

Here's what I said. This is eugenics. You need to look this up if you don't remember what we're talking about guys.

We've talked about this forever. James Corbus don't work on this for a long time.

The study of how to arrange reproduction within the human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics

regarded as desirable.

This is Nazi level discussion, guys.

This is about the idea of breeding out certain things of certain people.

Now these lunatics have genetics, genetic manipulation, right?

The science, the technology to then do that.

One point they just thought, let's kill the bad ones.

And now at a time when they're talking about the still discussing that, weeding out the crime gene.

Right? Because it's not your fault.

You just commit crimes because then you're in your DNA, right?

Well, that's half a half a, like just a shaving away from, well, black people, right?

Or these kind of people or this kind of religion.

Or yep, that's the whole thing, guys. These are supremacists.

Now you could make it about whatever you want.

It's the same point to say that certain kinds of people have no, you're just don't know any better.

That you're born with a certain thing that you can't get past.

We have to get rid of you.

You can make it white, black, Jewish, Christian, whatever you want.

It's all insane.

And none of it actually makes sense.

And frankly, none of it's even scientific.

Who gets to decide what characteristics qualify for weeding, Elon?

Who decides if you're in those groups in the first place?

Oh, the same upstein class.

Apparently, eugenics was born in the United States.

In case you don't know that, it was adopted by the Nazis.

It's all coming back around.

It seems, in fact, they never really left.

And that's not some kind of Nazi World War II point, guys.

It's about the ideology that drives these things, whether Nazis are not.

And that's always been there.

It's super important that we understand that because guys, these people are not just influential.

They're driving the bus right now.

Now, on the point of media manipulation, which is what Elon is a huge part of,

I just thought this was hilarious, but also important to see.

Janice Girl points this out.

Israel Influencer.

Sue's Israel for non-payment.

And it just happens to be our old buddy, Elon Levy.

You know, the guy who got fired for lying and then continued to propagandaize for Israel.

And it's now demanding payment for the times that he was fired and wasn't actually being paid.

Right.

So then it seems that he was not fired.

And the idea was to create a circumstance where you're like, I'm just a guy that lives Israel.

No, you're being paid to lie about Israel.

Well, that's what they do, though, right?

That's the real.

$10,000 or whatever they were being paid.

Law suits equating millions of shekels have been filed against the Israeli government

for stifting their paid influencers.

Among those who didn't pay, who didn't get paid, Elon Levy.

You got to love this.

Israel also flew paid protesters to the Hague to protest against the pro-Palestine protesters.

This is the kind of world we're living in, guys.

We know this.

But you see, these people will point out there will be a protest somewhere.

And certainly, as I've always said, yes, that could be manipulated in influence.

There could be paid protests.

That's in any circumstance.

But in many cases where there are genuine protests going on and you get the right and left

of the same thing when their time comes, they go, oh, they're all about your sorrow, so on,

so and they're all paid.

Yeah, possibly prove it though.

I'd like to see evidence.

But either way, protests, they have a right whether or paid or not.

In this case, you have via verifiable realities of whether influence the line.

These guys getting paid to go out and create fake protest, fake anything.

And you don't hear a peep.

Why?

Because it's the same thing every time.

Just like you didn't hear the left calling out things about COVID.

What was their time?

Because partisans are dumb.

I shouldn't say like that.

Manipulative.

I mean, look, I, you know, I opinion, I think very clearly when it comes to people, I don't

know, when I say that, I mean, team sport partisans, not that you believe you have more, you

know, prince more in line with conservative or liberal, those are just opinions.

Those are just policies.

My mind is that people that are team sport partisan players that will ignore the facts and

their integrity and their principles for the team.

That's what I'm talking about.

I do find that stupid.

But at the end of the day, the right way to frame that not to be subjective is just manipulative.

People that don't really care about what they're doing, they care about what they're being

driven to do or what they want to achieve by manipulating you.

Elon Levy is a disgusting human being.

And I mean, that objectively based on what he has said about starving children, about

bombing innocent people, they're disgusting.

And now they're not getting paid.

Now they're suing the government that paid them to lie about the, I think that's poetic

justice.

Here's the article by the way, in case you thought I was just from Dennis girl.

This is Israeli media claims in the millions.

They were recruited to for outreach at the height of the crisis to lie to you, right?

And then discovered they were being shafted.

Well guess what?

You know what that shows me?

That shows me that everyone's struggling.

You don't stiff the people trying to lie for you unless you just don't have the funds.

I would argue.

At the end of the day, they are stretched in like we know the US is and I think that's

what this shows.

Now on media, that's super embarrassing.

You might have seen this.

I mean, this is just the same thing in regard to control over media, the manipulation,

the propaganda left or right.

Here's Fox News.

You probably saw this going around.

Now the quick story in this and you can watch it.

It's very, very broadly covered is that he had what they call it.

It's a dignified transfer when a, an Americans died because of their legal foreign wars.

And they, you know, salute as they marched them into the plane with a coffin.

And a flag over the coffin, right?

Just like the, just like the meme we just talked about.

And of course reports are upwards of hundreds have been killed and they're only lying about

seven of them or telling you seven.

You can decide for yourself.

That's true.

I think it's pretty obvious that they're hiding something like they have every single

time I've been involved in this.

I mean, the sense of like bodies being killed like with the Iraq bombing all the, all

the sweat.

They say 100 concussive, you know, brain injuries.

They just think we're that stupid.

But the point here is that they had this and Trump shows up with a bulk app on which

frankly, I don't care.

I don't, I don't see why that would be taken as some kind of an insult.

But either way, I mean, there's a decorum point we made, but that's, that's for these

people.

Do what they want.

Trump shows up in a baseball cap or whatever, mag a hat.

And this has been very widely covered.

Then apparently the story goes that he was angry or people were criticizing him.

So he called Fox News and says, don't show that.

And what they do, well, they went, they doodifully did what they were told.

And instead, they lied to everybody and they got an older clip, which is from December

and showed him looking like that, even though it says Saturday, but you could decide if

that's dishonest.

I mean, it is that they're lying to you.

And what it ultimately shows is that as many pointed out is that they're working for

the Trump administration at the very least that they'll, as CNN recently said, well,

Israel says we're not allowed to show this.

And so they don't show it to you.

That's where we are.

And hiding anymore that Fox News was like, oh, it'll embarrass him.

So let's just show something else.

You may find it to be a small point.

That's not journalism.

That's propaganda.

And speaking of propaganda, off Guardian rightly points this out, what does this remind

you of?

Where's what they posted?

And this was like a government posted thing.

It says, dare the rest of the world.

We're just cooler than you, cooler than you, sorry, sincerely America.

God, that's cringey.

It's embarrassing.

And frankly, if you hopefully, if you're out there watching the show, that is not what

I think most Americans are like.

That is what they want you to think.

That is the supremacist manipulative partisan childish thing that is, I don't believe

represents most people in this country.

I could certainly be wrong.

I know that they exist and they're everywhere, but I laugh at people like this because that's

just ridiculous.

It's childish.

But what does this remind you of?

I don't want to play the music just because it's obnoxious.

I'll make a point about it in a second.

Oh, so you got military personnel doing little dances for the video.

Hmm, it's almost like they have the same playbook every time no matter what they're

doing.

It just goes on forever and it's all this weird compilation of, you know, and as you

write, rightly so, off Guardian, getting dancing nurses vibes, it's the same thing.

It's just the same stuff.

Left, right?

This government is the government.

And they're putting these things out to how, you know, dancing military in the midst of

a very serious dynamic.

Well, here's some videos with video game graphics in it because we take this very seriously.

So the song they're playing is the sound of silence because of course it is, right?

Because these people are this stupid.

I don't think they even understand that I think, oh, that sounds cool.

And it was the, what's the group that redid it?

I forget.

You know, not the original, but the group that redid the song.

Do they know what this song is about?

This is about a stupid as was it Reagan who used fortune at Sun thinking that like, you

know, or born in the USA, like, okay, those things are pretty critical of US government.

But they don't care because oh, USA, woohoo, this is cool, right?

Fortune has said, yeah, you know, these songs are critical of your war policy, but you're

dumb.

So you don't care.

Like the song, sound of silence, it just kills me.

These people, or maybe they are trying to use it anyway.

I don't know, but it's just embarrassing what's going on right now.

And it stands out very, very clearly to me.

And censorship.

Mike Prizener all added this, including it to make sure it was in this section, right?

Discussed this account being censored, which was brought back, but it was censored for

24 hours when they were trying to convince people at the peak of the sharing of this that

they don't need.

They have rights to be a conscientious objector.

All Appalachian Liberty points out how Twitter is all of that free speech, right?

Update on my post.

I appealed the decision.

The decision was upheld.

So this exact wording is indeed considered violent speech, okay?

Here we are, right, Charlie Kirk has free speech, hate speech, bond detail.

They want you to believe they hear you, right?

Charlie Kirk said hate speech is free speech, right?

Then bondy comes out pointing to Charlie Kirk and says hate speech is not free speech.

And using his name.

They know what they're doing.

They're very dishonest.

So in this case, it's one step further, right?

No, you are the left.

If you are fighting for this, if you agree with what Bonnie and Trump and the rest of

them are doing, you are the left you so despise if you're in the partisan game.

Because violent speech is free speech.

Regardless of what you words are not violence.

That was a huge thing during the left right that when you guys were fighting the left, now

you're in power.

Now suddenly violent speech is dangerous because you said the word fascist.

Some of you are ridiculous, but this is where this gets important.

He tagged Harrison Smith and says Israel would be easy to destroy.

Just quit paying their bills for them and defending them when they stay, stay a new war.

That is what he just got censored for.

That's what they tagged.

Violence speech.

Israel would be easy to destroy.

You mean you're how many people right now are discussing how easy Iran or how Iran might

be destroyed and how what they want it to be destroyed, kill everybody in Iran.

It's all over the place.

And then he says, quit paying their bills, defending them.

I mean, clearly you know what this is.

This is because Israel and their A at every Israeli driven Zionist apparatus is focused

on all of this, all these platforms and it is coming down like a hammer.

And if you're not honest about this, everyone's going to see who you are because this is

not free speech.

He says just for contrast, these posts are apparently fine and not restricted in any way.

We need white genocide now.

We need white genocide.

I responded to one Christ one Christ King PHA PG or you it's clearly about white genocide.

So this person is very much a partisan, right?

I would argue anyway, not that that's not points to be made about that exact discussion,

but that it seems to be the over focus.

I mean, I can be wrong.

But either way, you could look up credit like people right now going because that's what

I would think.

Right now, you know, people out there going Iran should be destroyed or rather that Iran

so weak, it could be destroyed tomorrow.

It's the same point.

It doesn't matter.

I mean, I mean, again, I don't even think these points need to be expressed.

I think this is self-evident, but there's a lot of lying manipulators out there.

That's the problem.

And I think that's becoming more seen than ever.

But Twitter and Elon Musk are censoring people for saying that Israel is easy to destroy.

Period.

That's censorship.

That's not free speech.

I, apparently, am being censored as well, like I always am on this platform.

Just Primo Radical says just realized I am somehow no longer a following a bunch of accounts

that I was also seems that I'm not able to follow T-Lev at the moment.

It looks like he ended up getting it.

For some reason, every back to the pre-Elon shadow banning impression, throttling, and

concealed censorship, it's never stopped.

Now Daniel Adams also points out any update on how X maintains safety in X, uh, uh, it

maintains safety of Twitter in times of crisis.

This is X safety pointing out as part of Twitter's incident response protocol, Twitter.

I just screwed myself up by hitting that.

Where was that protocol basically as part of Twitter's incident response protocol?

There is Twitter initiated proactive manual sweeps to identify and remove violent, violent,

violent, like violating content in less than three hours.

From initial strikes.

I find that an interesting framing in the time of strikes happening in the world.

This sweeps have been running 24-7 response was initiated and are supplemented with weird

timing.

Don't you think X is actively scaling its enforcement by building it?

Okay.

The bottom line guys is they shut down on the sixth made a massive push and everyone

noticed what went away.

All of the content showing Tel Aviv being bombed.

And Daniel McAdams says this is why you cannot find any accurate posts about what's actually

happening in Israel and Iran.

Twitter is functioning as a censor for the US government.

No big deal or rather, excuse me, no, nothing new, excuse me, in the name of safety, just

like they did during COVID, same SHIT.

On as people can see this, it's the same situation guys with a little different flavor.

Now, I'm thinking, let's see.

Since what we covered in there, I'm thinking I might just wrap it right now guys.

I know that probably frustrates some people since it's not as long as usual, but because

it's also pretty late.

But I have a good amount I want to get into that I feel like if I get into it now, it's

going to make this much, much longer.

And I want to make sure I give this an attentive, you know, I don't want to get tired and wrap

it up toward the end.

But I will end up getting what I want to point out here about a couple of things that

I'm going to get to.

And it will be tomorrow for those in here in the beginning, I'll be doing this tomorrow

and I can't promise it'll be early in the day, but it'll be my goal anyway.

There's always new things that pop up, you know, for those who don't know, that's what

tends to be the thing is that I have stuff that I pulled off and then you get into the

day and it's like, oh my goodness, some new, like when, of course, when the Iran thing popped

off, it was like, oh man, I had like 15 different topics pulled to the side of this well-researched,

like multiple things.

And it's like, okay, well, obviously it's important to talk about it.

And those things are still sitting there and I may or may not get to them.

You guys have no idea how many things that I can spend hours researching days, weeks researching

that end up just kind of falling to the side that I forget about, you know, and I so much

because you just can't get to everything.

There's so much going on, it's just incredible, guys.

But what I want to get to in general, I want to get into is some discussion about the

AI overlap in Anthropic because I was telling you, which we did touch on, but I want to

go into that a bit tomorrow.

If you didn't see it, the U.S. State Department has approved $151 billion, excuse me, million

dollars on top of what they already been sending.

On top of what they sent, and on top of what they sent, on top of that, more, and on top

of that, Rubio has determined that it's an emergency.

So no congressional oversight, oh, weird.

At the same time, he probably liked, but we don't even need it though.

Watch.

That's what they're doing because emergency, that's why we don't have to.

But if I didn't need that, we, you know, it's what they're doing with the bombing of

Iran.

Well, we shouldn't have to war powers act as a constitutional anyway, but we're going

to try to meet it.

It's slowly moving the dial away from needing any of that stuff.

And that's what a lot of these screaming people are pushing.

Well, yeah, that, we'll get into a lot of this tomorrow, but the overall point of where

the war is at, right?

And this is, right, there's interesting discussions about this.

One of the main titles I saw was one week into the war, the fallout is global, which

is very much the opposite.

I want people to think NPR, NPR actually updated that title and it's funny that every,

like a hundred of these posts immediately changed it, which was to, what was it?

It went from one week in the global to, what was it, it's right here.

Trump warrants Iran will be hit very hard as war enters the second week, quite a different

title, don't you think?

And I will show you this tomorrow, but it's just funny to me how it was every one of them.

And I just caught one that wasn't, didn't catch the update and it's just funny how quickly

everybody tries to change the narrative everywhere you look.

And I think I'll leave it there in general, yeah, it's just a lot of updates on a lot of

this stuff.

Now, if you haven't seen what's happening into Ron, I mean, it's, it's, they're bombing

the oil field here.

I actually, I will show you this real quick because I didn't want to make this point about

the gas, right?

And the reality as, as Hegseth here tells you that Iranians who think they're going to

live, right?

Basically, they're, the only one who needs to be worried is the Iranians who think they're

going to live as they're indiscriminately bombing, which we can see all over the place.

I mean, the evidence is insane.

It's exactly what we see them do everywhere else is real in particular, commercial, commercial

civilian buildings, airliners, salination plants, water, you know, I mean, and they got

people cheering this on.

Obviously insane focused on civilian locations.

And by the way, as we promised, they're now using the Ben Gurren airport as a base.

As we told you, they would, as many others did as well.

And no one wants to call that this, you know, people that have once called things human

shield failed to call that even though we've now proven that it's still being used as civilians

because they told us that it is that's a civilian shield dynamic.

The lie about Mario Nafal telling you that they bombed community in some kind of underground

base that even Twitter called out and said, nope, it was above the ground and then removed

because Elon Musk apparently can just remove whatever he wants and nobody can do anything

about it.

I mean, that's, that's the reality and you could prove that's true, by the way.

It was there and then they removed it because we're in information war every single day.

But as Cyan points out, nope, that's nonsense.

He was in his office that he used for decades.

It was above the ground, but they have to make it seem like it was some secret, deep underground

base, you know, like all these other 3D maps that Israel lied about and got caught lying

about.

Why?

Because they want you to think one that they're evil villains hiding everything but two

because they bombed a civilian building full of tons of other people.

They want you to think it wasn't.

It's as simple as that and they're bombing all over the place everywhere you look.

And my point to end with here is that they look at the sky, guys.

This is what Iran looks at.

Iran looks like right now.

You know why?

Because they bombed tons of oil facilities, all cars.

It's creating a toxic circumstance for them right now times, excuse me, time magazine.

The air is unreadable to run shrouded in cloud of toxic smoke after Israel strikes fuel

depot, strikes fuel depot.

And you can argue there's more going on here.

I considered that seeing as how they did the same things in Gaza, they're literally

poising these people or you could talk about like a dioxin East Palestine dynamic or whatever

you want to get into.

These people are suffering right now.

All the people of Tehran, it's insane.

And what does that lead to?

This price problems as Kuwait's telling you, Opex fifth biggest producer said it has

reduced oil because straight of her moves, which appears to still be somewhat operative.

Even though we're here, you know, it's, but what I'm told is it's shut down by a huge

degree because of the threat, right?

But I still see ships there.

So consider that.

But I, you know, they're still claiming there's a, you know, which I do get, you know,

the threat alone would brought, they say 94 plus percent is what I read.

But so that all leads to the fact that as Trump just said, don't worry.

This is going to go down very quickly way down real quick.

He just said that, right?

Same time you've got cutter saying, no, probably not because it's going to go up to 150

barrel.

And that might destroy the economy of the world.

Apparently right now it's 110.

Lastly heard over 100 was kind of catastrophic.

And here we are 110.

But Trump's like, don't worry.

It's all going to be fine.

And then 10 seconds after that, he goes, don't worry, they, they go up, they go up.

You got to love the escalation, right?

That's what I was laughing about that.

Boy, that escalated quickly.

He goes from, they're going to go down real fast to everything's going crazy.

We're bombing oil everywhere.

Oh, they go up, they go up.

Oh, big deal.

Hashtag winning.

Well, on top of that, they're telling you on Fox News that we're going to take the

oil.

So they're doing it right now.

We're going to take all the oil.

So I want you to think about what we're talking about here, the reality that they're literally

bombing bombing oil facilities, right?

Well, we also have the reality of Iraq too, Iraq, same conversation, oil production in

Iraq is now declined by 3 million barrels.

Why?

Because I already showed you they have operations on going in Iraq, even though we're not talking

about it.

And on top of that, the current situation, which is overlapping with Iraq and Syria is part

of this.

Trump calls on curves to go into Iran, but then stands up now that it's already going

on and goes, I don't want that.

That's bad politics.

We're not stupid, Trump.

We know you paid them.

We know you armed them.

It's been going on well before your administration.

We already have the evidence that you and your administration have been doing this a week

before you started the attack on Iran, under the guise of diplomacy, because you're

a villain like the rest of your government left and right.

And now now Trump says he doesn't want the curves.

What's happening already?

That's just his clumsy way of making it seem like somehow he doesn't want it or it's

not happening.

Even though we know it is, maybe like a backward way of hiding the fact that you just

armed separatists to manipulate the government, which is a crime, but either way, Israel backing

curves.

It's already happening.

They were the ones that told you first, they were already on the ground already invading

by the way before Trump was even doing that.

My point though is that they're attacking oil infrastructure and your gas is affected

by that.

You think that's a plan with those limited strikes?

Guys, is this somehow about the taking out the bad government or is this about destroying

Iran?

Is this about destroying it for a larger global purpose?

You don't really need to think that hard to understand what this is.

The thing that's happening is like a half a second mission creep to the next thing

they swore would never happen right in front of you.

The truth is, guys, all of this is affecting.

It's like when he said the tariffs weren't going to cause your grocery prices to go up

and then yeah, they did.

And as far as they can tell, like, haven't even really gone back down.

So we can lie to ourselves we want or we can be honest about what we're dealing with

and try to do something to actually change it for the better regardless of who you support.

So I will be tuning in.

I'll be doing a show tomorrow, so please tune in because we're going to get right back

to all of this.

Honestly, I have one point that you're going to enjoy probably that I think is worthy

of calling out that I can wait till tomorrow about Alex Jones and the claim of suddenly

recognizing Israel and Trump is exposing, you know, basically telling you right now that

Trump is out there telling you that foreign governments have influenced this.

He's literally playing a clip of Trump saying the Israel lobby is the strongest lobby.

You know, that clip that I played a thousand times, acting like he just discovered it

from 2025 going, what is all this?

I'm not even kidding.

We're going to do tomorrow.

Like acting like like he's baffled by what is this?

Like he's almost doing it just like that and I've shared that thread, by the way, I

mean, I can show you the thread right now.

Wow, where was that?

This one, which you guys have seen so many times, right?

The other thread of exactly that topic, Trump openly states that Israel used to control

the US Congress, right?

Several multiple examples of it, but over here he's showing you going, oh my God, look

at this thing.

Most powerful lobby, what's happening?

Maybe because, you know, if the group, anyway, I'll get it to it, trust me.

It's pretty insane because at the same time, they're talking about the reality of this

or at least giving you like a fraction of part of it.

They're still in a material sense or whatever you want to call it, like in action, we're

supporting the real thing.

Supporting Israel, whether you believe that or not, supporting Trump, supporting the

team, even though it's never been more clear my entire life.

And through that, supporting globalism, as much as that's pretty crazy for people to

think about with what he's always been saying.

But the truth is, guys, most of these people are spinning out because it's never been

more clear to people.

And I'm glad to see that.

Not just because people like that deserve to be seen for the manipulators they are, but

because people out there are finally starting to see the bigger questions, right?

Not which side, but do either of them need to exist, right?

Are we being lied to by all of them?

Is this about something much larger than what we're actually talking about?

I mean, we should be asking these questions every single day, questioning every single

one of them, no matter who you support.

I know you guys agree.

Thank you for tuning in.

Plenty more to talk about.

I love you all.

As always, question everything.

Come to your own conclusions.

Stay vigilant.