About this episode
It can be stomach-turning, watching the Trump administration torch federal climate policy. But what if some of what's burning wasn't working particularly well to begin with? Hannah Safford and Loren Schulman of the Federation of American Scientists' Center for Regulatory Ingenuity make the case, not for defending or trying to rebuild the status quo regulatory regime, but for imagining something better.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.volts.wtf/subscribe
Get every episode summarized
Each time Volts publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Volts
Best of August 2026
Volts
Sep 4, 202612:34failed
How to respond to disinformation about clean energy, at scale
Volts
Sep 2, 20261:11:49pending
Could we use Trump's tricks to make good green policy?
Volts
Aug 28, 20261:08:44pending
Making data centers flexible so they can serve the grid rather than stress it ou...
Volts
Aug 26, 202653:24pending