Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsSep 3, 202659:49

Road Warrior Radio with Chris Hinkley, September 3, 2026 Hour 2

Get every episode summarized

Each time Republic Broadcasting Network publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Transcript ready

398 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Road Warrior Radio with Chris Hinkley, September 3, 2026 Hour 2

Republic Broadcasting Network

0:00
59:49

Full transcript

Republic Broadcasting NetworkRoad Warrior Radio with Chris Hinkley, September 3, 2026 Hour 2. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

There are many people in the world who really don't understand freedom as many difficulties. But we have never had to put a wall out to keep our people in. Freedom is indivisible. And when one man is enslaved, all are not free. Modern wars become a struggle for men's minds as well as for their bodies. Today in the face of an enemy who sends enormous sums of money and manpower all over the

world. It is a contest unlike any we have ever faced in our history as a nation. Contest for the minds and the power of so people around the world. When power corrupts, poetry cleanses. We must never forget that art is not a form of propaganda. It is a form of truth. Psychologists find that control of emotions can be gained by understanding the stimulus response happening. Many everyday things become associated with these private stimuli, partly by a process of conditioning. With this strange shadowy world, the doctor photographed the misquote facial and the

situation of the law. I think of the fire that makes me the mother. We will have to work together. We will light our country and all who serve us. And the growth from that fire. And truly light the world.

Yes, the modern warfare. Our military leaders are finding that words and ideas are highly effective weapons. Welcome back. Top of the second hour of today's road warrior radio broadcast is Thursday, September 3, 2026, as we're descending into full 9-11 memorial season. And the propaganda is all around us. And there are the subtle, sayops, I wore elements that would dissuade any sort of criticism, any sort of public criticism of the official establishment narrative, which itself can always remain in the state of flux as it necessarily must to avoid any serious criticism in or well in fashion.

The narrative can always change. And you'll be gaslighted immediately when you say, well, wait a minute. I thought you just said, I thought that was different. You'll get the Greta Thinberg finger wagging out there you. How dare you disrespect the memory. How dare you? Yeah, that you get that you get the emotional outbursts and those kinds of things. How dare you disrespect the memory of those people? No, actually, I'm trying to honor the memory of those people by not lying about what happened. That's actually what we're doing. Trying to honor people who actually youth dishonored by being dishonest and lying about what happened. That's not honorable. There's nothing honorable about that. So, you know, it's interesting how these things go. The CIA's memo, which is a fact of sort of urban lore now.

CIMMO 1035-960. Even the AP has their little deal on this. For example, there's this. There's so much. I mean, this is published back in 2023, January 6, 2023. And you wonder the timing on this conspiracy theory coined. And so what was going on? There's something going on around January 2023, something. Another big deal rhymes with Ovid, I guess. Anyway, AP news article conspiracy theory, quote unquote coined long before JFK assassination by a graph. Is that a real name? Claim the terms conspiracy theory and conspiracy theorists were created by the Central Intelligence Agency.

Who claims this? This is called a straw man. This is not a real argument. Following the assassination of President John F Kennedy as a way of discrediting people who doubted the government's official reports. AP assessment false. We've tipped over that straw man recorded use of the phrase conspiracy theory, quote unquote dates back to at least 1863. And it was notably invoked in reports following the 1881 shooting of the then president James a Garfield more than 60 years before the CIA was established. Well, that's. I mean, if you know your history talking about conspiracy theory and James Garfield is the stri-stand effect. Well, you're trying to hide something there, but you just kind of made it more obvious because before there was Kennedy, there was Garfield. So, yeah, that's interesting. Did you really double down? That's like that's like bad guy hubris right there, I think. To double down.

Before there was the assassination of Kennedy, there was the shooting the 1881 shooting of then president James a Garfield. That is astounding. That's some that's some hubris right there, I think. And then the facts follow and there, you know, two APs credit in this article. There is actually a link in the middle of the article to the CIA dispatch the 1967 CIA dispatch. 1035-960. And kind of a discussion. It's interesting. There's this bit. The facts following the National Archives release last month of an additional 12,000 and it's 79 documents related to Kennedy's death. Interesting longstanding myths about the president's 1963 shooting has resurged on social media. So you got to get out in front of that stuff, right.

Among these myths is what some scholars have called a meta conspiracy theory. The belief that the CIA is part of an unproven cover-up. Point the term conspiracy theory to discredit people who accused CIA of order shooting Kennedy's killing. There it is again. So now speaking of meta conspiracy theory, there's the meta deception and the meta sia where you're saying the CIA coined the term. That is not the case. No one ever, no serious scholar who seriously pursued this historical episode, Patrick Lawson ever said the CIA coined the term conspiracy theory. Obviously that is nobly, provably false. What has been asserted is that the CIA weaponized the term conspiracy theory specifically to shame and humiliate anyone who would question the official narrative on the Kennedy assassination.

And the dispatch is titled countering criticism of the Warren report. The subject of the dispatch is countering criticism of the Warren report. That should tell you all you need to know. And Aaron Melissa Dykes a million years ago did a great video. I think one explainer in particular that really just kind of drew attention specifically to the points from the dispatch. That deal with this issue of trying to as the dispatch is title counter criticism of the Warren report and the official establishment narrative, whatever that may be.

And again, the Warren report was garbage, just like the 911 commission report and Alan Dulles himself famously remarked that you know it's no big deal because the American people don't read. So from the dispatch, let's see, our concern from the day of President Kennedy's assassination on, there has been speculation about the responsibility for his murder. It's not murder, it's assassination, but okay. Because assassination is murder with a political or religious motive, although this was this was stemmed for a time by the Warren commission report, which appeared at the end of September, 1964. For various writers have now had time to scan the commission's published report and documents for a new for a new pretext for questioning. And there has been a new wave of books and articles criticizing the commission's findings, but see here's the thing.

This doesn't deal with getting to the bottom of things or the facts. This doesn't. This dispatch isn't talking about people who challenge the facts. It's people who criticize the Warren report and the official establishment narrative. However wrong it may be. It's not interesting. Again, one of those kind of like, if they can get you asking the wrong questions, they never have to worry about the answers. You know, the CIA didn't coin the term. No, of course not. But they did weaponize it in dispatch 1035-960, countering criticism in the Warren report. And in order to counter criticism, they weaponize the term conspiracy there. So every effort should be made. They said to do that in every at every opportunity and every publication.

Anybody who says anything about conspiracy should be labeled and construed as a quack. So continuing presumably as a result of the increasing challenge to the Warren commission's report, a public opinion poll recently indicated this is 1967. That 46% of the American public did not think that Oswald acted alone while more than half of those pulled through that. More than half of those pulled thought that the commission had left some questions on resolve. Daetless polls abroad would show similar or possibly more adverse results. Well, that should tell us something shouldn't it? And that's the concern that people are asking questions. This trend of opinion is a matter of concern to the US government, including our organization. That's the CIA.

The members of the Warren commission again, a like the 9-11 commission commission set up to fail and not find what it ostensibly. What we presume it would is the American public. Members of the Warren commission were naturally chosen for their integrity, experience and prominence, sure. Or because they would ensure that what was what should be found would never be found. They presented both major parties and then their staff were to see how we get the explainer in these things. They were deliberately drawn from all sections of the country just because of the standing of the commissioners efforts to impune their rectitude and was intent to cast out on the whole leadership of the American society. No, because they're insiders and because they seem to be trying to be deceptive, shifty and misleading and to try to, you know, guys like Galindolus, when your business is deception.

Hard to trust you from the outset, you know, maybe trust, but definitely verify. Moreover, there seems to be an increasing tendency to hit the president Johnson himself as the one person who might be said to have benefited wasn't some way responsible for the assassination. Speaking of throwing out, you know, false trails and things limited hanging us and such. Any window of such serious effects, not only the individual concern, but also the whole reputation of the American government, our organization itself is directly involved. Among other facts, we contributed information to this investigation. Conspiracy theories have frequently thrown suspicion on our organization. For example, by falsely alleging that Lee Harvey Oswald worked for us while it's come out that actually he did.

And the FBI, I digress, the aim of this dispatch is to prove material for countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists. So I mean, there you go. The aim of this dispatch is to provide excuse or not prove, but to provide material for countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries. Background information is supplied in a classified section in a number of unclassified attachments action. We do not recommend that discussion of the assassination question be initiated where it is not already taking place where discussion is active. However, addresses are requested. Here's what the CIA recommended a to discuss the publicity problem with liaison and friendly, e-week contacts, especially politicians and editors.

Pointing out that the war commission made its thorough investigation as humanly possible except not really. The the charges of critics of the critics are without serious foundation. Oh, we're not supposed to investigate it there is a foundation. Okay. And that further speculation, speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition, what opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by communist propaganda. Well, that's probably because they're from the CIA's front groups like Grazon Demand.com, you're home for anyway. Because that's obviously job number one. You want to make sure that you create the opposition with the thing. That's the countergang strategy that's Frank Kitson, like WebTarkley explained so brilliantly and succinctly.

So countergang strategy, you want to make sure that you control all the voices. That's the way to control the opposition is to lead it or create it if it's not already. Probably just create it. Why not? Okay. So urge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation unfounded and irresponsible. Who decides that's an arbitrary designation? Who decides what constitutes unfounded and irresponsible speculation? Like I said yesterday, Colombo, the Colombo routine should be a full effect here. So B, what are the recommendations? B, to employ propaganda assets to answer and refute the attacks of the critics, book reviews, and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose, the unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passage to assets to assets.

Or, you know, I feel like when we're talking about assets here, I feel like I hear John Stadmiller voice saying ass hats in the back of my mind because assets are asshats. And so are the people passing background material to them. Our place should point out our play. We play games. That's what we do. Our place should point out as applicable that the critics are one, wedded to the theory, wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in to politically interested, three financially interested, four pasty and inaccurate in their research or five, infatuated with their own theories in this course of discussions. That's basically, that's a, gosh, what do you call it? That's a, what do you call it?

Flickish? Okay. Yeah. In a second. So what do you call it? You call it at hominem attack, obviously. That's what it is. At hominem attack, when you attack the man, not the argument. And so that's what the CIA is doing here, attacking the character and psychological stability of the person who's saying, wait a second, something doesn't make sense here. How can you fire, you know, first of all, he's not an expert, March, men. Second of all, what is, what is supposed to have occurred is impossible. With that rifle, and it's also impossible from that vantage point. It's just impossible.

Expert marksman in today's world with better equipment have not been able to do what someone who is not an expert marksman was a left show of done. Yes, those questions and the CIA says you should be countered because you're politically, you're wed to your theory politically interested financial interest, you said, hasty and inaccurate, infatuated with your own theory, all these things, it's absurd. In the course of discussions of the whole phenomenon of criticism, a useful strategy may be to single out Epstein's theory for attack using the attached Fletcher, Nebbel article and spectator piece for background. Although Mark Lane's book is much less convincing than Epstein's and comes off badly were contested by knowledgeable critics, it is also much more difficult to answer as a whole as one becomes lost in a morass of unrelated details.

So they're supposed to stay no significant new evidence as emerged, critics usually overvalued particular items and ignore others. Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal in the United States, especially since informants could expect to receive large royalties, etc. Note that Robert Kennedy attorney general at the time in JFK's brother would be the last man to overlook or conceal any conspiracy. Well, as the story goes, Harry S. Truman as vice president didn't know about the Manhattan project until he was read in, so to speak, after becoming sworn after being sworn in as president. So maybe it is possible to conceal a conspiracy on a large scale. There are many others obviously that have happened.

So. The final point point number five from the dispatch says it reads, where possible counter speculation by encouraging reference to the commission's report itself open minded foreign readers should still be impressed by the care, thrownness and activity and speed with which the commission work reviewers of other books might be encouraged to add to their account the idea that checking back with the report itself they found it. So far superior to the work of its critics. Well, this coming from an organization that engineered the counter culture revolution while you know review of other books, books perhaps. Let's say at the least condoned by this organization.

At the most maybe you know there were some go shredding involve. I mean for an organization that engineered the counter culture revolution and the cultural revolutionist itself and it's so ironic, you know. The criticism, you know, is it comes the CIA says from the communists, communist synthesizer drawer, communist and self by you know an organization that created the communist counter culture revolution, how ironic it's the pot calling itself or calling the kettle black might as well be itself because it created the kettle too. So the kettle is its offspring. But back to the original point, it's just interesting that the dispatch itself mentions that the aim of the dispatch is to provide material for countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorist so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims.

In other countries among other things. So no, no one ever, no serious person ever claimed this straw man argument that the conspiracy theory term was coined by the CIA. That's obviously ridiculous. But the CIA clearly did weaponize any serious criticism of the Warren report itself, but also with the establishment narrative surrounding the assassination, you know, the the peculiarities. In the assassination of President John F Kennedy and there were a number of folks who died, there were dozens of folks actually died shortly after.

The Kennedy assassination, who were asking legitimate questions, which is another point that should peak our curiosity, why do dozens of people die mysteriously in some cases and very strange. A lot of car crashes and stuff like that, everybody just solve a sudden who had questions started having car crashes, it was really weird. But you know, it's just it's just a coincidence. So these are the kinds of things that we see happening and this is this is fast forward to now in 25 years after September 11, 2001. It's funny how there's just this relentless effort with these lives of history that are clearly lies because even the CIA's dispatch itself 1035-960 points out that at least, you know, around half of the American public probably more overseas question the narrative.

And now we fast forward to today is the same thing going on today. And so 25 years after September 11, 2001, we have the Netflix documentary, turning point, it's not a document, it's a propaganda film, but turning point generation 911 from Brian Nappenberger and the Guardian article by David Smith. Let us down such a dark path, documentary explores how 911 changed America and this little bit, well, I'll get to the real meat of the kind of the punchline of this article. I touched on it when I was talking about this article previously, but I'll do that after this short break coming up right now, stick around, drink back.

You are tuned in to the Republic Broadcasting Network. Visit our website by going to republic broadcasting dot org. Doctors are not able to explain the improvements they are seeing in their patient's health who are taking extended bite. People who once needed more pills are now taking less and getting better. Due to the unexplainable improvements in their patient's health, more doctors are calling to order extended bite for themselves. Help extend a bite make your doctor a believer. Extend a bite is available in capsule or liquid form for just $69.95 for a two month supply. To get started call 1-877-928-8822. That's 1-877-928-8822 or visit partdrop.com.

Extend your life with extended bite. What would you say if I told you we have a new tool that will increase production and lower maintenance costs for your meat processing company? And it would pay for itself in just six weeks. The new E-Zof Model E-Z4 replaces old spring style carcass droppers and is faster, safer and more reliable. The E-Zof lowers or lifts 1,000 pounds to or from your rail automatically using our remote control. Sounds expensive. Can I afford it? Can you afford not to try the E-Zof? It installs fast with just three bolts in place of your current dropper. The effortless operation will reduce fatigue and injuries, speed up your line, eliminate downtime and increase profit. How can I order my E-Zof? Go to ezoff.com, e-A-Z-E-O-F-F.com and hurry because we are offering $200 off on the new E-Z4 for a limited time. ezoff.com, we make pigs fly. Cows too. ezoff LLC, Summersville, Missouri. For 1-7-932-641-9.

Health simple with Colorado Shieldy. Factbit number 1. What goes in must come out. Whatever we ingest, breathe in or transfer by contact must be expelled. Expelled directly as burned calories, through perspiration, respiration or expelled via a urinary and gastric channels. Every element that is not properly used or removed by our bodies become toxins. And toxins as we know are causal to every disease and ailment. Toxins are what makes a subpar unable to be at our best. Be your healthy best by cleansing your body of daily and deeply embedded toxins. Live stronger and we hope live longer. Shieldy. The Gitch Shieldy that is like Colorado Shieldy. Is perhaps the greatest homeopathic whole body remover of toxins made by Mother Earth. Look to the Gold Mountain and Medical Symbol logo in Banners on RepublicBroadcasting.org to watch the full video and see more information. Use code GoRBN when ordering that's g-o-r-b-n.

Erika, Seis und Wunder, Auzent Leinen, Erika rein, Wir unschweren, Erika, Denn jetzt ist wohl mehr für die Zeit. Tausano, El Flügel, El Flügel, El Leinen, O der Heinen, Eikeinis, Lügel, Und das Eis, Erika. Welcome back. There are the guys that tell us the Masters of Technique and I think Lark would remind us of this, Lark in Texas. The Masters of Technique know this stuff. They know they are the Master of Maniculators. They get people to do things and I think there is a reality to do first delight.

You know, you get to a point where kind of like Bertrand Russell described in the impact of Science on Society that the Cruelties are something that you sort of delight in. You could see that Glenn, you know, Bill Gates talking about whenever he talks about hundreds of thousands of millions of people dying, why does he always go? What is funny about that to him? He seems like a very disturbed kind of person, truly. And I think he was tortured as a young person by his father. I think all of those, the revenge of the nerds crowd, you know, Elon and his brother, his brother in particular, has talked about how Elon was sort of tortured when he was a kid, bullied and things. Not just bullied, but in a very terrible kind of way. I think they all kind of have those similarities in what they kind of make their fowstie in bargain where the devil says,

I will make sure that you don't have this problem anymore. And that's where you get all this sort of pathological narcissism where person's real personality is locked away, and they're automatically sealed forever so that they're not injured anymore. But that means they don't really exist anymore. And there's some kind of fictitious person that's put forward some kind of persona, this manufactured and seems perfect, but obviously isn't. No one's perfect. The real person can never be heard again, but you know what that person dies effectively when that happens. I think you have a lot of those kinds of people, a lot of doopers, delight, a lot of weird stuff. And then there are the people who are genuinely, I don't know. They really, I think they really,

they really seem to enjoy hurting other people. It's a terrible thing. So I think there's a lot of that. Sam Keen's faces the enemy. By the way, Sam Keen needs to have his SSL certificate updated like Ralph Epperson. I want to get to the technology thing in a second actually. If we're going to use technology, we should use it right because if we don't then similar to that old adage doing business without advertising is like winking at a girl in the dark. You know you're doing it, but no one else knows you're doing it. She certainly doesn't know you're doing it. So using using the internet technology incorrectly is.

What do you say? It is an exercise in futility. But the bad guys know that and they want you to think you're doing so. It's kind of like being shadow band. If you're not using the technology effectively or properly, it is effectively like being shadow band on social media. You're shadow banding yourself. I'll tell you what I mean in a second. One of those things is the SSL certificate that Ralph Epperson.com and Sam Keen.com do not care. So basically all the browsers now tell people, oh my goodness, this site may have been hacked because it doesn't have enough to date SSL certificate. Nobody knows what that means. So they're not going to, you know, they don't know that Sam Keen probably manages his own stuff or has a small group of people, whatever effectively does it itself. Ralph Epperson's same thing.

So they just don't go. Don't visit that website. More importantly, a structured data. I'll get to that in a second. Anyway, this is, you know, this is the time of year when we should be asking questions. We should probably play James Corbett's 9-11 conspiracy theory before we're done. Patrick Clawson, since you have Patrick Clawson queued that 90 seconds of episode. I wrote an article about that. What's in a word? Back in 2019, because it finally struck me that he was saying the word episode. And that only happened when I was mulling over definitions of article episode incident incident, you know, different terms. So I started looking carefully. What do these things mean? And then suddenly what Patrick Clawson was saying really arrested my attention.

So speaking of that, sir, do you want to play Patrick Clawson on episodes? I frankly think that crisis initiation is really tough. And it's very hard for me to see how the United States president can get us to war with Iran. And which leads me to conclude that if in fact, compromise is not coming, that the traditional way of America gets to war is what would be best for you as interests. Some people might think that Mr. Roosevelt wanted to get us into World War II, as David mentioned. You may recall we had to wait for Pearl Harbor. Some people might think Mr. Wilson wanted to get us into World War I. You may recall he had to wait for the loose, tiny episode. Some people might think that Mr. Johnson wanted to send troops to Vietnam. You may recall they had to wait for the Gulf of Tonkin episode. We didn't go to war with Spain until the U.S. has until the main exploded. And may I point out that Mr. Lincoln did not feel he could call out the federal army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which is why he ordered the commander to do exactly that thing, which the South Carolinians had said would cause attack.

So if in fact the Iranians aren't going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war. I should be back in school. Yeah, crazy stuff. I mean, Patrick Lawson back in 2012, how to build U.S. Israeli coordination on preventing an Iranian nuclear breakout, September 25, 2012. And just some, I mean, you want to talk about conspiracy theory and crazy things that people say. Just a few things that he said, crisis initiation is really tough. The traditional way America gets to war is what would be best for U.S. interests. What is that traditional way America gets to war? And then he goes into these episodes, episode, episode, episode, episode. What are they? They're false black.

And I mentioned James Pearloff yesterday. No one has done a better job of debunking that kind of stuff and pointing out that they are false black episodes. Then James Pearloff. And so it concludes Patrick Lawson concludes by saying it would be best if someone at somebody else started the war. Is this what most Americans think is how things work? This is how the sausage is made. He's telling you he's a foreign policy expert at the Washington Institute for Nareesh Policy. This is what the foreign policy experts know and Larkin, Texas would remind us that the Masters of Technique know this very well. And what Patrick Lawson is saying is we need another episode to galvanize public support. It's interesting that we didn't get it in the Trump to administration. I think that's telling, but you know, what is an episode? An incident or event that is part of a progression or larger sequence.

An incident or action standing out by itself, but more or less connected with a complete series of events. So it's interesting, you know, all of these things from, you know, the episodes that Patrick Lawson mentioned there to the JFK assassination to September 11, 2001 to the COVID-19 immigrants. They're all episodes. They are all incidents or events that are part of a progression or a larger sequence. And they're all incidents or actions standing out by themselves, but more or less connected with a complete series of events. I'm probably getting ahead of myself. What is the, well, then what's the end game here? And the end game is some would call it world government, you know, the world socialist government that Bill Cooper talked about, that others have written and talked about.

I would say it's back to Genesis chapter 11. You know, it's, it's ironically it's Plato's vision. It's Plato's Republic. But it's Genesis chapter 11 and root to Genesis chapter 6. You know, it's the Tower of Babel and back to from there back to Genesis chapter 6. And ultimately war with God or at least an attempt, Psalm chapter 2. That's the ultimate end game. But there is that documentary James speaking of James Perlop back in June of 2015, published the, if you look, you go to us website James Perlop.net.

And you look at, right on. You look at the section books and miss missellanie. He has the shadow ring link there. And it says on June 5, 2015, Freemine Film Producer of a Nobel Lye and State of Mind released its newest documentary. The shadow ring was that documentary and Perlop writes which I scripted details the history of America shadow oligarchy, including the Council on Foreign Relations, domination of President of cabinets and policy, debatching our economy by the Federal Reserve. The use of false flag, false lives to emboleless and worse media control and the ultimate goal of world government. And so, you know, he's in it. It's narrated by Kevin Sorbo, owner-shattering movie is still an active domain. If not, it should be Freemine Films. Cool.

I guess so. So shadow ring was the third in a series. As you can see on FreemineFilms.com. A Nobel Lye Oklahoma City 1995 was the first state of mind psychology of control was the second shadow ring is the third. And shadow ring is based on the book written by James Perlop, the shadow is the power. And so this is how things really work. Probably should play. Speaking of all this stuff, probably should play some of this at some point. And I should finish the article, the Guardian article that I mentioned where control of the narrative is inferred and implied. By doing exactly what C.I. Memo or Dispatch 1035-960 did back in 1967 to shame the folks who would ask questions. How dare you, you know, disgrace the memory of these heroes and all that kind of stuff. How dare you.

Something, you know, making this false equivalence that somehow by asking questions, legitimate questions is 10 amount to doing what is insinuated in this article, which is probably done by an astroturfing bot farm of the operation Ernest Boyce anyway. To try to say that sound minded, free thinking, genuinely patriotic Americans who say, you know, something doesn't seem right about, I don't know, passport falling out of the sky and being found. Days later, you know, allegedly from a plane that was insinurated allegedly in a building that collapsed into its footprint. Oh, and there's this other building. Nothing crashed into, but it collapsed into its footprint building seven, of course.

And I don't know, guys like Barry Jennings had questions about that Barry Jennings said that he heard they heard explosions told ABC News that an explosion had trapped him in the building. Well, what exploded because nothing crashed into the building that also collapsed into its footprint. So when you're asking legitimate questions, we shouldn't allow ourselves to be cowed into being silenced. That is the objective here. You know that I know that. Yeah, sure, do all of the above. Yeah, we might as well. What should. Yeah, go ahead, go ahead, sir.

There is an independent agency and that means basically that there is no other agency of government, which can overrule actions that we take. So long is that is in place and there is no evidence that the administration or the Congress or anybody else is requesting that we do things other than what we think is the appropriate thing, then what the relationships are don't frankly matter. And I've had the relation. The administrative fourth branch in full effect, combining powers and functions of the three due constitutive branches unto itself. There is the conspiracy hiding out in plain sight from the former Fed chair himself, Alan Green speak. And you know before we run out of time, we should do James Corbett's magna mopus, a conspiracy 9-11 conspiracy theory, do you want to do that, sir.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, 19 men armed with box cutters directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily defended airspace in the world. Overpowering the passengers in the military combat train pilots on four commercial aircraft before flying those planes wildly off course for over an hour without being molested by a single fighter interceptor. These 19 hijackers, devout religious fundamentalists who like to drink alcohol, snort cocaine and live with pink-haired strippers managed to knock down three buildings with two planes in New York. While in Washington, a pilot who couldn't handle a single engine, Cessna was able to fly a 757 in an 8,000 foot descending 270 degree corkscrew turn to come exactly level with the ground. Hitting the Pentagon in the budget analyst office where DOD staffers were working on the mystery of the $2.3 trillion the Defense Secretary Donald Trump's felt had announced missing from the Pentagon's coffers in a press conference the day before on September 10, 2001.

Luckily, the news anchors knew who did it within minutes. The pundits knew within hours. The whole sum of in-law. The administration knew within the day. Terrorists who committed these acts. And those who harbor them. And the evidence literally fell into the FBI's lap. The hijackers passport was found blocks from the World Trade Center crash site. They can believe that. But for some reason, a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists demanded an investigation into the greatest attack on American soil in history. That investigation was delayed, underfunded, set up to fail, a conflict of interest, and a cover-up from start to finish. It was based on testimony extracted through torture, the records of which were destroyed. It failed to mention the existence of WTC7, Abledanger, P-Tech, Sibel Edmonds, OBL and the CIA, and the drills of hijacker craft being flown into buildings that were being simulated at the precise same time that those events were actually happening. It was lied to by the Pentagon, the CIA, the Bush administration, and as for Bush and Cheney, well, no one knows what they told it because they testified in secret off the record, not under oath, and behind closed doors.

It didn't bother to look at who funded the attacks because that question is ultimately of little, practical, significance. Still, the 9-11 commission did brilliantly answering all of the questions the public had, except most of the victim's family members' questions, and pinned blame on all the people responsible, although no one so much has lost their job. Determining the attacks were... Failure of imagination. Because... The way our government at least, and I don't think the prior government could envision flying airplanes into buildings. Except the Pentagon, FEMA, Nored, and the NRO. The CIA destroyed 2.5 terabytes of data on Abledanger, but that's okay because it probably wasn't important. The SEC destroyed their records on the investigation into the insider trading before the attacks, but that's okay because destroying the records of the largest investigation in SEC history is just part of routine record keeping. NIST has classified the data that they used for their model of WTC7's collapse, but that's okay because knowing how they made their model of the collapse would jeopardize public safety. The FBI has argued that all material related to their investigation of 9-11 should be kept secret from the public, but that's okay because the FBI probably has nothing to hide.

This man never existed, nor has anything he had to say worthy of your attention, and if you say otherwise, you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist and deserve to be shunned by all of humanity. Likewise him, him, him, and her, and her and him. Osama bin Laden lived in the cave fortress in the hills of Afghanistan, but somehow got away. Then he was hiding out in Torra Bora, but somehow got away. Then he lived in a botabod for years, taunting the most comprehensive intelligence dragnet employing the most sophisticated technology in the history of the world for a decade, releasing video after video with complete impunity and getting younger and younger as he did so, before finally being found in a daring SEAL team raid which wasn't recorded on video, in which he didn't resist, or uses his wife as a human shield, and in which these crack special forces operatives panicked and killed this unarmed man, supposedly the best source of intelligence about those dastardly terrorists on the entire planet. Then they dumped his body in the ocean before telling anyone about it. Then a couple dozen of that team members died in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan. This is the story of 9-11 brought to you by the media which told you the hard truths about... This hit could be seen to move violently forward.

And... It took the babies out, and the incubators. And... mobile production facilities. And... The rescue of Jessica Lynch. If you have any questions about this story, you are a batshit paranoid tinfoil dog abusing baby hater and will be reviled by everyone. If you love your country and or freedom, happiness, rainbows, rock n' roll, puppy dogs, apple pie, and your grandma, you will never ever express doubts about any part of this story to anyone. Ever. This has been a public service announcement by the friends of the FBI CIA NSA DIA SEC NSM White House NIST in the 9-11 Commission. Because ignorance is strength. And there you go. Yeah, actually in reality we know that... If you don't ask questions... Then... You are that...

That you know what paranoid tinfoil dog abusing baby hating person who should be reviled by everyone. You should ask questions. If you get sucked into... Uh... Cowing to the establishment narrative. You're so cowardly that you can't ask legitimate questions. That you know your mind is just, you know, it's like... Well, the line from the matrix is like a splinter in your mind driving a med. You know, something is not right about this. Like how does, you know, I think maybe it's time for t-shirts and hats again about Building 7. We hear, never forget. And maybe there should be the twin towers on either side and then Building 7 collapsed in its footprint there in the middle. Never forget. And maybe just, you know, the picture there. What does that mean? Oh, well, that's Building 7 that collapsed into its footprint which wasn't hit by anything. But...

Folks like Barry Jennings, who was the deputy director of the emergency services department for New York City Housing Authority, said that an explosion trapped him in the building. And then it collapsed into its footprint after being hit by nothing. So, you know, explain that. Riddle me that, Batman. How does a building hit by nothing except, you know, some a little bit of falling debris, nothing significant? How does it collapse into its footprint at three-fall speed? There is a way that happens historically. And you can watch lots of videos on it, of it online. But of course, you couldn't conceal a conspiracy that large. And so, it must be impossible, right? Except it happened.

I know it was a lot of free association. Some of the same thing they ran, but I hope it was informative. Perhaps the event of fighting is always a truly is an honor and a pleasure. So, take care. Don't let anyone call you. Ask honest questions. Don't entertain dishonesty and deception. Take care. God bless you. Catch you on the other side. I am the model. I have inside me blood of kings. I have no rival. Now I can't leave my car. Take me to the future of you all. Tahibah tea clubs are original pure pouty arcos. Super tea comes from the only tree in the world that fungus does not grow on. As a result, it naturally has anti-fungal, anti-infection, antiviral, anti-bacterial, anti-inflammation, and anti-parasite properties.

So, the tea is great for healthy people because it helps build the immune system. And it can truly be miraculous for someone fighting a potentially life-threatening disease due to an infection diabetes or cancer. The tea is also organic and naturally caffeine-free. A £1 package of tea is $49.95, which includes shipping. To order, please visit drinksupert.com. The first word is drink spelled D-R-I-N-K. Then the word super, then the word tea. The complete website is drinksupert.com or call us at 818-965-9113. Monday through Saturday 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. California time. That's 818-965-9113. DrinkSuperT.com.

More episodes

More from Republic Broadcasting Network

View all episodes →