Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsMar 25, 202611:19

Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 14)

About this episode

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   


In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.




The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:
  1. Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.
  2. Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.
  3. Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.
  4. Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.
RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.

To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.




In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Get every episode summarized

Each time The Diddy Diaries publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

115 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 14)

The Diddy Diaries

0:00
11:19

Full transcript

The Diddy DiariesRodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 14). Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

What's up everyone and welcome back to the program. In this episode we're going to pick up where we left off, with the Rodney Jones, second amended complaint filed against Diddy. Oh, also among the specific acts giving rise to constructive knowledge were the facts that associates of Mr. Combs made numerous reimbursement requests to defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and the Universal Music Group through Mr. Combs' account in Robin Greenhill. The circumstances of these reimbursement requests gave defendant notice that Mr. Combs' sex trafficking enterprise was being funded. P. Upon information and belief, among the financial benefits that defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group received for participating in and facilitating Combs' sex trafficking venture were the affiliation in access to Mr. Combs' popularity.

Before Cassie Ventura's lawsuit was filed, Mr. Combs was a popular and highly influential figure in the music industry to whom everyone wanted to connect. Mr. Combs was known for throwing the best parties, affiliation with and or general business partnerships with Mr. Combs, garnered legitimacy, immense success, and access to top and emerging artists, celebrities, famous athletes, political figures, musicians, and international dignitaries, like the British Royal Prince Harry. Defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group knew firsthand the power influence and effect attaching themselves to Mr. Combs would have on their bottom line and is evidenced by their repeated general business partnership agreements with Mr. Combs from 2003 through 2005, 2009 through 2015, and 2022 through 2023.

Defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group profited from the affiliation with Mr. Combs and their general business partnership which came with unmonitored financing that may have supported his sex trafficking enterprise. Mr. Combs and Combs controlled entities use the financing they received from the general business partners to facilitate their sex trafficking venture. Mr. Combs benefited from his general business partners apparent willful blindness through their willingness to provide large amounts of financing in suspicious circumstances and their failure to ensure that their general business partners properly reported their financing to the US federal government. Q. Upon information and belief among the financial benefits that defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group received for participating in Combs' sex trafficking venture was a referral of business opportunities from Mr. Combs and

his co-conspirators, accessed up and coming artists, producers, songwriters, and creatives. Defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group profited from these referred business opportunities. Mr. Combs referred business opportunities to defendants Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group in exchange for financing his sex trafficking venture. These referrals were quid pro quo for defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group's unchecked financing of the establishment of love records incorporated and the funding and reimbursement for the invoiced expenses associated with the creation of the love album. R. Upon information and belief defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown

and Universal Music Group knowingly received financial benefits and return for its assistance, support, and facilitation of Combs' sex trafficking venture. Defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group knew or should have known that if it stopped assisting supporting and facilitating Combs' sex trafficking venture, it would no longer receive those benefits. Upon information and belief defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group knew and was in reckless disregard of the fact that it was Combs' pattern and practice to use the channels and instrumentalities of interstate and foreign commerce, private jets, yachts, and commercial airplanes to entice recruits solicit harbor, provide obtain, and transport young women and young men for the purpose of causing commercial sex acts and violation of US code 18, section 1591, and 1. T. Upon information and belief defendant

Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group and its employees had actual knowledge that they were facilitating Combs' sexual abuse and sex trafficking conspiracy to recruit solicit and entice coerce harbor transport obtain and propel Mr. Jones into commercial sex acts through the means of force, threats of force, fraud, abuse of process, and coercion, and the combination of all these means. You upon information and belief despite such knowledge defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group intentionally paid for, facilitated and participated in Combs' violation of US code 18, section 1591, and 1. Which defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group knew and were in reckless disregard of the fact that Combs would coerce to fraud

and force Mr. Jones to engage in commercial sex acts. V. Upon information and belief defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group through its employees and agents actively participated in the sex trafficking conspiracy and let Mr. Jones and sex workers to believe that they would be rewarded if they cooperated and acquiesced to Mr. Combs' coercive demands. W. Upon information and belief defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group's affirmative conduct was committed knowingly and in reckless disregard of the facts that Mr. Combs would use financial support provided by defendant Lucian Charles Grange in his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group as a means of defrauding, forcing, and coercing sex acts from Mr. Jones. Defendant Lucian Charles Grange capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal

Music Group's conduct was outrageous and intentional. X. Upon information and belief in addition to actual knowledge that I was participating in and facilitating the Combs' sex trafficking venture defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group also should have known that I was participating in and facilitating a venture that had engaged in coercive sex trafficking as covered by U.S. Code 18, Section 1595A. Why? Upon information and belief in exchange for facilitating and covering up Combs' commercial sex trafficking, defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group received international recognition, notoriety, and praise for the establishment of love records incorporated and development and distribution of the love album. This was a result of securing the Sean Combs love records incorporated relationship. X. Facilitating and covering up Combs' sex trafficking

and misconduct was a means of obtaining economic success and promotion within the defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group's hierarchy. Upon information and belief, defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group's intentional conduct has caused Mr. John Sirius harm, including without limitation, physical, psychological, emotional, financial, and reputational harm. BB Upon information and belief, defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group, knowing an intentional conduct has caused Mr. John's harm that is sufficiently serious under all the surrounding circumstances to compel a reasonable person in the same background and in the same circumstances to perform or to continue performing a commercial sexual activity to avoid incurring any harm. C.C. This case does not involve

instead defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group's criminal conduct and violating the TVPA was outrageous and intentional because it was in deliberate furtherance of widespread and dangerous criminal sex trafficking organization. Defendants Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group's willful blindness to combs criminal conduct also showed a high degree of moral turptitude and demonstrated such wanton dishonesty to imply a criminal indifference to civil obligations. Defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group's criminal conduct was directed specifically at Mr. Jones who was the victim of combs sexual abuse and sex trafficking organization. D.D. Upon information and belief defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group's

outrageous and intentional conduct in this case is part of a pattern and practice of defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group profiting by undertaking illegal high risk high reward general business partnerships 376 by virtue of these knowing and intentional violations of US code 18 section 1591 A&2 1595 defendant Lucian Charles Grange and his capacity as CEO of UMG Motown Records and Universal Music Group is liable to Mr. Jones for the damages he sustained and reasonable attorneys fees. Alright folks that's going to do it for this one in the next episode we're going to bring this bad boy home and finish it off all of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.

More episodes

More from The Diddy Diaries

View all episodes →