Loading...
Loading...

Dave Smith brings you the latest in politics! On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave is joined by Scott Horton to talk about people's changed feelings on Trump compared to his first term, potential boots on the ground in Iran, the connection to past terror wars, and more.
Support Our Sponsors:
The Wellness Company - Manage midlife with MARS from The Wellness Company! http://www.twc.health/problem & use code PROBLEM for 10% + Free Shipping on all orders for US residents
Ultra - Don’t sleep on Ultra Pouches. New customers get 15% Off with code PROBLEM at https://takeultra.com!
VanMan - https://vanman.shop/DAVE
MASA Chips - https://www.masachips.com/DAVE
Part Of The Problem is available for early pre-release at https://partoftheproblem.com as well as an exclusive episode on Thursday!
PORCH TOUR DATES HERE:
https://robbernsteincomedy.com/events
Find Run Your Mouth here:
YouTube - http://youtube.com/@RunYourMouth
iTunes - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/run-your-mouth-podcast/id1211469807
Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/4ka50RAKTxFTxbtyPP8AHm
Follow the show on social media:
X:
http://x.com/ComicDaveSmith
http://x.com/RobbieTheFire
Instagram:
http://instagram.com/theproblemdavesmith
http://instagram.com/robbiethefire
#libertarian
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
What's up, everybody? Welcome to a brand new episode of Part of the Problem. We got a good
one for you today, as it's always a great one when we have Scott Horton on the show. I
don't know that there is at this point anyone who listens to my show who isn't already
very familiar with Scott and his work, but if you're not, you really should get familiar
with him. He's the best foreign policy guy in the country. His books, Fools, Aaron,
and enough already and provoked the first two being about the terror wars and the latter
being about the proxy war in Ukraine are just phenomenal. I mean, I've learned so much
from them. And of course, he is a long time managing editor over anti-war.com, which is,
I mean, I always sing the praises of that organization, but man, have they just been
particularly invaluable lately when really nobody is, we'll get into it in the episode,
but my god, the dereliction of duty of the corporate media, nothing that we're surprised
about, but Dave DeCamp and Kyle Lancelone, those guys have just been phenomenal as usual.
And of course, he has the Scott Horton Academy, which if you really want to become an expert
in this thing and be able to, if you want to be able to win every debate on this topic
and really understand what's going on, you've got to sign up over there. So Scott, thank
you so much for coming on. How's it going?
Thanks, Dave. Good to be here. Thanks for that introduction. Also, do two shows here
on the YouTube. Oh, yes. Horton Show is my interview show and provoked with Daryl Cooper
that we do usually live on Friday nights, although not so much this month. But anyway, thanks
for having me, man. I know. I'm sorry. It's really long by you.
No, it's no problem. Listen to your show and provoked our phenomenal as well. And people
really should go listen to both of those provoked, of course, your show with Daryl Cooper.
And you guys always have like very insightful and thoughtful takes on what's going on.
And obviously I wanted so just so note to the viewers or listeners. So I am headed off.
I'm going to go. I'm taking the family on vacation tomorrow. I'm going to be gone for
a week. I understand that is is is not the best timing. But we planned this out like six
months ago. So, you know, I don't if Donald Trump could start, you know, insane wars at better
timing, that'd be good. But anyway, so I will the members only episode will not be tomorrow.
I will make all of that up next week. And then we'll we'll get back to it. But I wanted
to make sure I got Scott in here before I left because, you know, there's a new war
going on. And we haven't had you on the show yet. And you're always the best at breaking
these things down. And particularly ruining your vacation, dude, what happened was they
heard that I was moving. And so they were now. And then you're just collateral damage
in the thing. I was you were using me as a human shield of sorts. I feel. But this
also it's not just a, you know, it's not just that there's a new war on. But this is
a war that really is been you know, I mean, you've had several different areas of expertise
and areas that you've really, you know, specialized in. But Iran is debatably the biggest
one. I mean, there's even though your books were well, I mean, you know, enough already
is actually a lot about Iran. And so there's, and you've been talking about this and debunking
all of the war propaganda lies for decades at this point. And so I'm very interested
to get your perspective on this. I just before we get into that, I did want to just base.
I wanted to talk about something very quickly. And then we'll talk about Iran for the rest
of the show. But I wanted to, I got into like a little bit of a, like a Twitter back
and forth with a many Hassan yesterday. And you know, we ended up messaging each other
like afterward. And it was resolved amicably. And like I, you know, I don't know, I just
got enough, I got enough enemies and I'm fighting with enough people. There's enough people
out there who hate me and want to ruin me and all this shit. They're like, I don't really
want to be fighting with other people who are against this right now. Because you know,
just doesn't seem to make any sense. But you know, there's this kind of dynamic. And I responded
to him because it's been a little bit bigger than just him. I've seen several people leftists,
some libertarians who have really been kind of, you know, really, let's say giving a hard time
to me and other people who supported Donald Trump in, in 24. And it's interesting to have you
here for this because you did not support Donald Trump in 24. And so it's, you know, I'm curious
to get your take on this, I suppose. But from my, from my perspective, it's not the easiest place
to be to make this argument because it's like, well, look, yeah, I was wrong to vote for Donald
Trump. This does certainly seem worse than even just a standard administration. The calculation
was wrong. That being said, I was making the point to many, which I, you know, to a lot of people,
you know, I've gotten this from kind of a group of the purist libertarians who are upset with me
because I voted for Donald Trump. And then you get this a lot from more like liberal or leftist
types. One in saying, chicken, the libertarian party, who I'm embarrassed to have ever supported,
tweeted to me, she goes, she said, you know, I was calling out Donald Trump and she said, you,
you voted for Donald Trump, sit down. And you're like, so that's, I go, so that's what you'd have me
do, libertarian lady, that would be your strategy would have me in this moment, sit down and stop,
like, you know, convincing people that this is bad or something. I just, let me, Smith.
Well, look, what I said to Medi and I think this is fair. And I'm not trying to knock the guy. We
have a lot of areas of disagreement, but you know what, we have a lot of areas of agreement. And
when Medi's on your side, he's a good, he's a pit ball. He's a good guy arguing, you know,
against the war or whatever. But like, I said, is this got, and tell me if you think this is fair,
when, when the anti-war left suddenly re-emerged after me and you were in there, we were good friends,
and we were on the front lines of this information war all those years where they just didn't care,
dude, like Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, me and you were losing our minds about this. None of
all the sudden on Gaza, and I mean, there were good anti-war leftists all along, obviously,
but the mass movement of leftists against the war came back. And guys like me and you all went,
great, that's awesome that you're back, that's awesome that you're good on this most important
issue. Because what really matters is like, there's a goddamn genocide going on. We need as
many people against this thing as we can get. And I never would have even thought to go to one of
them to go, aha, you voted for Biden, dummy. Isn't there sit down? Isn't there egg on your face?
Like, you're somehow so stupid that you got duped or you're somehow culpable or something like that.
And then you suddenly got calling me out, voted for Biden and calls out the genocide.
In Gaza, he voted for the guy who started the genocide, but yet somehow now, anyway, I just
wanted to make this point that it's like, guys like, first of all, this is stupid. But second of all,
like, can we just like, why wouldn't you want this? By the way, this comes off of and obviously,
I'm catching his back because he's a close friend and he's my general. But Rogan came out and
criticized the war. And then, you know, people are like, given him shit because he supported Trump.
And you're like, dude, he's the most influential guy in the country. You don't want the most
influential guy in the country to be against this thing right now. Like, I just, I don't know,
man. Like, what's, you know, you have cleaner hands than this than me because obviously,
I'm biased here. I voted for the guy and I kind of look bad for doing it. But what do you think
about all of this? Well, a few things. I mean, just on that last point and this goes for you and
for Rogan too, it's more important that y'all are former Trump supporters who change your mind.
That's how you're listed in this thing. Not that I like talked with you about your endorsement
of Trump or whatever, but I think it does work out for the best that you're listed in a long
list of names of people who supported him and a badly so, you know, endorsed him, not just
voted for him, but endorsed him who then said, Oh, man, but I'm not going with him down this road
on whichever road it was and even including in his first year of his second term here. And so,
you know, in a way, if you understand my meaning here, I wish I had voted for him just so I could
also be a former Trump supporter kind of thing. The same way as it would be better for my argument
if I had ever been in the army or, you know, these kinds of things. You got to attack the right from
the right. Well, I'm a Libertarian. You know, I'm an Austinite, Dave. So I'm from Austin, but I'm also
from Texas. And so this is why I'm Libertarian. There's a lot of Libertarians in this town. A lot of
people end up bad on everything in this town. A lot of people end up good on everything. But so as
a Austinite and as a Texan, I've always understood and sympathized with to some degree why anyone on
the left would think the right is worse and would support the left indivine. And so that and
vice versa is so obvious. So many reasons are so many things bad about the left. Why if anyone
would have at least a 50, 50 chance of deciding that no, they're a right winger and they've got to
stand at least against those guys. And as politics, sorry, as um, as just Ramondo said, politics is
about who you hate. And so like, why do we even have these giant coalitions of the left and the right
in the first place that make up these parties? It's to keep the other guys out because they're worse.
That's what it's all about. And so and in fact, what was the choice in 2024? Was it about having
Donald Trump or no president at all? That would have been nice. No, it was him or Kamala Harris. And
can you imagine just if the the cultural and political left remained completely unchecked since 2009
all the way through? Because the first Trump term was no check on it. Yeah. And they're getting
completely out of control. And as I've said all along quite publicly from the very beginning,
I have rooted for Trump all three times. I can never cast my vote for him because of the Zionism.
It's just the most poison pill in America first. And I can just see right through the guy
as long as he's a Zionist, then he's taken us to war. And there's a lot of other things wrong
with him too. But that's it. That's something that he can never get out from under him.
Might as well have Paul Wolfowitz as his chief of staff and secretary of defense and national
security visor and secretary of state too. He's doing what they couldn't pull off, right?
What do people mean when they criticize Paul Wolfowitz? They're talking about Benjamin Netanyahu.
That's who Paul Wolfowitz is is Benjamin Netanyahu's agent in America, right? So for those less
familiar, Sharon was prime minister back then. But the neo conservatives in America were really
closer to Netanyahu and his faction of Lakude, which Sharon ended up leaving and creating his own
party and leaving Lakude to Netanyahu. So anyway. All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank
our sponsor for today's show, which is the wellness company highlighting their new product Mars.
Now, before I tell you what it does, every time I mention this product, the sales skyrocket.
As you guys know, low-test Australia is an issue for men, particularly men as they start to get
older into their 40s into their 50s. There's lots of effects of low testosterone, a lower libido,
lower energy, mood swings, gaining fat while losing muscle, brain fog, poor sleep, hair loss.
Now, a lot of people think that this is just part of midlife, but it's actually your hormones
asking for help. Well, the go-to now is Mars from the wellness company. Mars is a non-injectable,
hormone-free formula designed to support your body's own testosterone production. There's no
prescriptions. There's no synthetic hormones and no needles. If you want to boost your
testosterone, but you don't want to take needles and you don't want to take hormones, go check this
out at twc.healthslashproblem and use the promo code problem to get 10% off plus free shipping on
every order for US residents. People have been raving about Mars, go check it out for yourself,
the wellness company, twc.healthslashproblem. Once again, promo code problem for 10% off and
free shipping. All right, let's get back into the show. So look, I don't blame anybody for
voting for Trump, and especially when it comes to keeping the other guys out,
seems I don't necessarily really blame Democrats for being more afraid of the right
because of the things that are dangerous about them, you know, depending on what it is,
a much more sympathetic with the right these days, just because the left went completely nuts,
having too much hegemony for too long in a row. And so there are certainly, you know,
but I'm certainly not mad at you or anybody else that voted for Trump. I don't blame y'all. I think
anyone who says that, you know, geez, we had no way of knowing that he had violent tendencies
of any kind were willfully blind during his first term when he bond Afghanistan for four years
by the way, you know, well, yeah, I mean, basically kept up air operations in the south of the
country for like three out of the four years and killed tens of thousands of people. And of course,
he supported the Saudi and UAE war against the poor people of Yemen for four years straight,
a war he and again inherited from Obama, but kept going on for his entire time and power.
You know, was ruthless in his destruction of the Islamic state and finishing a rock war three
there took all the gloves off and devolved command authority as far down the chain of command as
possible, same for Somalia. And you know, it's just finally finishing the audio book of provoked.
And the very end of it is I wrote it after the election, but before he sworn in, right, the book came
out in November after the election of 24. And I cite in there a lot of reasons to be pessimistic
about Trump's foreign policy in his second term, you know, as bad as we needed Ron Paul, we got
Rudy Giuliani. And that's really who Donald Trump is. And people I know like to, I'm reminded of
all the argument I got in with Justin Romando on about Trump back in 2016, where I says Trump,
I'm poor and against everything. Justin, wow, I really like about half of the things this type said.
You know what I mean? Like, I'm just sitting here going, yeah, I'm sorry, this isn't going to work
on me. Call me too much of a purist myself, I guess, but after, you know, essentially raising
Ron Paul up to some sort of demigod type status in my mind, it's hard to compare another politician
to him and not be too disappointed, you know? No, that's for sure. And you know, I always knew,
it's funny because I do feel like, again, whatever, I shouldn't spend too much time defending myself,
here, I'll leave it to other people to do that. But I feel like, like, if you go back and listen
to any of the episodes, even when I said I was supporting Donald Trump, I mean, I think there was one,
I once referred to it as the most unenthusiastic vote in the history of voting. I basically said
that it was just a middle finger to Kamala Harris. And I was particularly, I kind of, I didn't
support Trump all the way through the campaign. It was at the very end when Kamala Harris started
bringing Liz Cheney out on the campaign trail with her and then giving a whole the fucking,
you know, like in the most idiotic Kamala Harris, giving a history lesson about how World War Two
means not a fight stuff. I read that quote in a speech one time and just killed everyone was just
dying laughing. I mean, it's just ridiculous, dude. But anyway, so, but I was never really
selling Donald Trump as, oh no, he's the peace president. He's going to be against the
wars. I was, let's say, extremely cautiously optimistic that like, well, I mean, the establishment
really has pissed him off this time. They've really tried to put him in jail and maybe even tried
to kill him and, oh, okay, look, he's bringing in Tulsi Gabbard and he's bringing it, you know,
kind of figures like Moon, JD Vans, he picked him instead of Ruby. You know, there was like
something, maybe this, I will say this. And this is, I think, where I really got things wrong.
And I think this, I was very distal, I realized how I'd gotten things wrong last summer during
the 12-day war was that I guess, and I always said, in fact, I believe it's, it's on record, but
it was when Zach and Liz had me on their show and they said, what's the number one concern about
a second president Trump term? And I went, oh, well, around is the number one concern? Like,
he's a real hawk on a ramp. And Liz said that he won't attack. Yeah, that is a danger.
That's not good. She said, she's better when I'm around. But so, I guess like, and maybe you
could take us through a little bit of this history here, but I guess this is the thing that I kind of
got wrong. So I know that because I've learned this from your excellent work as well as some other
great writers that, okay, so at the end of the Bush administration, right, what was it? I think it was
in 2007 or 2008, maybe even when there was really the push to go, when Cheney was trying to push
W to go to war in around, so there's an 07. And essentially, it was a bunch of stuff like all
right around that time happened where there was the CIA came out and said like, they're not working
on a bomb. Like, they're not trying to develop a nuclear weapon. And then the actual military,
like convinced George W. Bush that like, yeah, we cannot do this. And there was all types of
concerns over escalation dominance and retaliatory attacks and, you know, a lot of the stuff that
we're seeing playing out right now. And I suppose that I really did, you know, get trapped in a
little bit of like, this is the end of history moment there, where I just, I got, I think I got
a little married to the narrative that, hey, the fucking clean break, you know, Israel serving
neocons, they had this plan for getting these seven regime changes. But Vladimir Putin denied
him one in Syria and the logistics were just too impossible and around. And so that's kind of like
boxing. And then, you know, oh, they ended up getting the regime change in Syria anyway. And then
they ended up getting their war and around anyway. So, but I guess I thought that those obstacles,
the fact that the intelligence agencies and the military top brass were like, we will not do this
that that would essentially box out, you know, this, this crazy policy. Or I was wrong about that.
Yeah. Well, it worked on W. Bush. So to go back to then, what happened was if you'll remember that
Donald Rumsfeld said, we should get out of Iraq. James Baker's right. Let's cut and run. And
Bush said, you're fired and brought in Robert Gates and decided to increase the war. Instead,
send extra 30,000 troops to the war. And this was the so-called surge. They put David Patreus in
charge. And so there were two big narratives at the time. One was that everything wrong in
Iraq is is Iran's fault. Even though we've been fighting for the Shiites against the
Sunni insurgency all this time. So that's kind of odd, but okay. And based on that claim,
they went to war against Muttada Al-Sadr, who was the least Iranian tide of the three major pillars
of the Shiite United Iraqi alliance. Dala and Scary have been living in Iran for 20 years.
Sadr had stayed. But at this time, they attacked him and actually ended up chasing him into Iran,
making him closer to Iran. And then where he went to school and got a higher religious rank,
a little bit of blowback for you there. But again, the whole war was being fought for him and
for this United Iraqi alliance, who had written the Constitution and won the elections and all that.
But so as part of this, they were building the narrative. So long as they're attacking the Shiites in
Saudi city and East Baghdad and down in Najah and they're fighting back, then they say that every
time a Shiite sets off a bomb, it's an Iranian bomb. It's not just an IED and provides explosive
device. It's an EFP, explosively foreign penetrator. And you're just supposed to believe
that they all come from Iran. Now, it's not true. And as I show in enough already, I have,
I guess it's like seven or eight different sources from American media, where they were there in
Iraq and found, you know, embedded with US troops and found these machine shops in Iraq,
where these bombs were being made in Iraq by Iraqis. Happened over and over and over again.
And they were going to do a big press conference and prove that they were coming from Iran.
And then the reporters started gathering around the pile of material and they said the parts,
some of the parts that made in Haditha or made in UAE on them and things like this,
showing that they had not come from Iran at all. And then they ended up closing down the press
conference and the National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley admitted, yeah, well, the evidence wasn't
quite there for that. And this was after months and months of Michael Gordon was part of this
conspiracy with Dick Cheney and David Betrayez. And he's from the New York Times. He's not
at the Wall Street Journal. He was the co-author with Judith Miller of all of those stories about
Saddam seeking a bomb parts. He wants to spend centrifuges and enrich uranium and all this stuff.
Michael Gordon was co-author on all those. She got, he got promoted. And anyway, so here he is
in 07 pushing this lie about the EFPs and they were trying to do this as a drumbeat to get
to attack Iran. They actually, Dave, it was funny because I remember this we joked about it at
the time that they sort of forgot all about Iran's illicit secret nuclear weapons program
for like half a year or more because now it's all about these EFPs. And since they're lying and
it's a matter of just changing narratives, the truth doesn't keep, you know, the thing they used
to say doesn't keep coming up because it's not really there. You know what I mean? Anyway,
but as you mentioned, the Pentagon had told Bush in January of 07. They said, listen,
we will do the search. No promise present, but we don't want to go to Iran.
Now, the question is, same as now. Can America defeat them like ultimately crush their military
and degrade their government forces potentially even to the point of collapse? Sure. I mean,
even shorter nukes, we have B-52s. People have seen the footage of the B-52s just pouring
what they call carpet bombing over North Vietnam. We could do that to Tehran, right? Does America
have the ability to do that? Yeah. But today, will they have a say in a conflict? Even if we
went to total air war against them like that, would they have a say in the conflict? Yes, they would.
And we would not have escalation dominance, which means their idea that they would control every
stage of the war, whether it ramps up or ramps down or whatever it is, that it's all on them to
decide what happens next in the war. The other guys are only ever reacting to us. They don't want
to fight unless it's that unfair of a fight. And they're saying, it won't be. They will be able to
reach out and touch us. Now, at that time, we had some like 50,000 guys in Afghanistan and 150,000
guys in Iraq. And especially in Iraq, they were embedded with Shiite forces and Saadir's forces
and the Supreme Islamic Council's forces. The Bata Brigade had both sworn that they would take
Iran's side and kill our guys, who they were embedded with, who we've been fighting the war for
this whole time, and that they would all be orders 66 right out of there. And so this was one of
the main reasons back then that the Pentagon did not want to take that on. But at the same time,
and I swear, you know, some enterprise and young students should go back and find,
go search through the YouTubes. Maybe the AI is good enough now to find it. I bet you could find
probably 25 times or maybe more, maybe 50 times in various interviews or something that I've said
over the last 15, 20 years in these various forums about this, that we have troops in Kuwait
in Bahrain, where it's the Fifth Fleet. You know, we have Army and Air Force in Kuwait. We have
the Fifth Fleet Station at Bahrain. We have the massive AUD Air Base in Qatar, which is central
command headquarters. And of course, we have bases in Saudi Arabia, in UAE, and I didn't even realize
Oman, but I guess I should have known, yeah, Oman too. And of course, there's a trillion, or
sometimes I've said gazillion. I'm like, we're on pause to say the same thing over and over again
for 20 years in a row. And something like trillions of dollars worth, or gazillions of dollars worth
economic targets, all up and down the other side of that Gulf, including oil and every other kind
of economic target, you know, airports and hotels and all of these other things. And what do they do?
They hit everything. The New York Times has an update today where they've hit, I don't want to
get the number wrong, they've hit a lot of bases over there and they've taken out a lot of radar
stations. Now, they're not just decimating everything, but they are severely crippling each
in every base virtually over there that America has. And they've hit refineries, they've hit oil
platforms in the Gulf, they hit just one or two ships, was enough to close the Gulf, they've hit
massive oil refineries in Bahrain as well as today they hit, pardon me, today they hit one in
Oman, which is, you know, burning out of control, I saw this morning. The American, I guess,
Air Force hit or maybe see Israeli spawn one of their Salonization plants. So then they bombed the
UAE or was it Bahrain Salonization plant? So, you know, they're not, you know, luckily they
evacuate all these American bases. We stuff very low casualties. Even if you count the now
expanded number of wounded is like 100 something there's all that they're still saying only seven
dead, I believe, or was it a, I think it's just seven dead, but that's because they evacuated
bases out of there, you know, the people out of those bases for the most part anyway.
So thank goodness for that that we don't have mass casualties here, but we still have,
you know, massive damage against American imperial infrastructure throughout the region. And,
you know, when they, when you see the Saudis and Bahrainis and, and, uh, and Miradis complaining
that I can't believe you pulled your anti-aircraft missiles out a year to move them to Israel.
Well, that's Americans on those bases who got their air cover pulled out of there to go to
Israel instead. Wasn't just the Bahrainis and the Emirates. It was our guys at those bases.
And they've also, and we don't know the extent of it because there's massive censorship in
Israel. They'll, you know, what they do, they'll let reporters show damage to civilian
infrastructure or targets or collateral damage or whatever, but they won't show damage to
military infrastructure, which of course skews the picture, makes it look like only innocent
civilians are being killed and all that. But supposedly the attacks on Israel are worse this time
than they were in June. I don't know the full extent of that. But, and then I'm sorry because I'm
rambling a bit. But the point, the real point being I should make here to wrap up is that
they really should not have done this. They did not have a coherent plan to do this.
Donald Trump ignored every bit of this advice that was given to George W. Bush back then. And
that George W. Bush went along with, you know, Netanyahu tried to bully Obama into this too. Obama
for the same reason as men. This is biting off more than we can chew more than we know what to do
with. And you can tell that at some point here, despite getting advice to the contrary, we know
that they had even a national intelligence estimate. People say, where the hell's Tulsi
gathered on this? Dude, apparently they, the, I don't know actually her role in it, but the National
Intelligence Council put out a secret report saying this isn't going to work. You shouldn't do it.
The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff leaked all over the place, including the Wall Street
Journal, that we're going to run out of anti-missile missiles before they run out of missiles.
And this is a real problem and we shouldn't do it. They did that before the war. And you can tell
at some point Trump just said, fuck it. Let's just do it, man. We're just like George W. Bush,
man, just like close your eyes and hit the button and just hope it works out, man. Don't we're just,
you know what we're going to do? We're going to get started and then we're going to figure it out.
And that's why they're jumping all over the place with all their different rationalizations for
how they want to do this. They can't decide whether they're going to kill the new IOTOla or the new
Supreme Leader, Comedy or not, or what? They want to back the Kurds. They want to back
the Balookies or, or, you know, whatever, you know, dissident factions. None of that is materializing.
The popular uprising is not happening. And well, it is. Well, it kind of is, but not the one
that they were open for. Yeah. Did you see Bahrain with the majority Shiite population tried to
rise up against their monarch on the event of Iran bombing, just like in the narrative from here?
All right, guys. Let's take a moment and think our sponsor for today's show, which is van man.
If you think Dr. Squatch is some small wholesome company or births, bees or native, we'll think
again, they've all been bought out by mega corporations and private equity firms who hijacked
these beloved brands and filled them with the same corporate slop as everyone else. But one company
is doing things differently, the van man company. They started the tallow trend a few years back with
their grass-fed tallow moisturizers. And they've been crushing it ever since with hit after hit
of clean, nearly edible solutions to everyday products. The thing about tallow is that it makes the
best moisturizer on earth because the fatty acids in tallow are nearly identical to the oils in your
own skin. Your body actually recognizes it. One use and you'll feel the difference. Your skin
will be softer and smoother than anything you've gotten from a bottle full of chemicals and fillers.
And because there's no filler garbage, a little goes a long way. The stuff actually lasts.
Tallow bomb isn't just a moisturizer, though. It can replace your lotion, your night cream,
your wrinkle cream, even neosporin and diaper bomb. So if you're ready to ditch the corporate
chemicals, go to vanman.shop slash Dave and use the promo code Dave for 15% off your first order.
That's vanman.shop slash Dave promo code Dave for 15% off your first ingredients. Van man real
ingredients, no exceptions. All right, let's get back into the show. I did see that, but I wasn't
even referring to that. I was just literally this morning and this was for I think the second or
third day in a row. I don't know, dude, did you see the aerial and these are not AI images?
They were all verified. The aerial pictures of the pro regime demonstrations in Tehran. I mean,
dude, there must have been a million people in that crowd. But certainly hundreds and hundreds of
thousands of people. And this is and listen, you're more of an Iran expert than I am, but I like,
I know enough to know this is in Tehran. This is in like the most liberal part of Iran. This is
the part where there's if you know, whenever you hear, which there is some degree of truth to,
but when you'll hear the hawks say that like there is kind of like a tradition of liberalism
in Iran that then also kind of lives next to this tradition of like more hardcore right wing
Islamist types. And yes, it is true that you when the shot when our puppet was in there for 25
years, you would see women and mini skirts in Tehran and for people who go there and have done
some guerrilla journalism, you know, even under the Ayatollah rule, there's still like underground
nightclubs and there's girls who do go out that that's this area. That's where the city is. That's
where like the liberal people are. And it's a city of I think it's like nine and a half million
people live in Tehran something in that ballpark. There's they got like a million people in the street.
They got like a like a ninth of the total population. I'm just eyeballing the numbers. But if you
look at those shots, it's certainly in the many hundreds of thousands of people that are out,
chanting death to America and long live their martyr Ayatollah.
And crucially, those pictures are not AI. And yesterday on the Twitter's, everyone,
you know, in the war party was going around attempting to debunk those pictures and claiming
that they were either fake or that they were old. They are from 2020. But of course,
Glenn Greenwald took up this jihad and showed like no, you're wrong and Grock was saying,
yeah, this picture is fake. This is old. This is from 2020. And people treat Grock like it's God.
But it gets around all the time all the time. Good. And so there, this is, you know,
verified pictures taken by New York Times freelancers in Iran who turned in those pictures. So
no reason to suspect their fake whatsoever. But they're, you know, there are a lot of
copes like that. Dave, I'm sure you had the same experience where the massacre at the girl's
school at the start of the war where, you know, in my mentions, I got people so married to the
narrative that the Iranians did this themselves, either deliberately to make us look bad or it was
an anti-aircraft missile, but they just don't know what they're doing. And so they're missiles
sucked and hit it accidentally. And for days and days and days, they're coming at me about
just what an absolute idiot and traitor and treasonist and pro-terrest I am for thinking that it
was the US government that did it. And of course, the Pentagon today, as though they didn't know
immediately, whether they had hit this building or not, you know, we have to wait for a few days.
But today they announce that yes, of course, the DIA picked the target. They say it was an accident
from an old map or what. So whatever. Yeah, well, great. I mean, no, it's, it's, it's really
important. You bring that up. That was one of the things I was going to make sure to ask you about.
But I mean, the thing to me, I mean, look like once it was clear, which wasn't clear initially,
but once it became clear, got hit with a Tomahawk, it was like, okay, well, that's like,
there's three parties here, Iran, Israel and the United States of America and where are the ones
with Tomahawk? So Trump is like, hey, any country with Tomahawk's might have done it.
Right. Yeah, but yeah, right. It's ridiculous.
When he's cussing out the trash bin and he's like, well, a lot of people are saying stuff.
Well, he'd stand there in the middle of three by himself.
Yeah, I mean, it's like even when he was trying to make the thing where he was going like, well,
as you know, other countries have Tomahawks too, and they could have maybe sold one to a rep.
You're even like, okay, yeah, I guess that is theoretically possible. But like the overwhelming,
you know what I'm saying? Like it's like, yes, like when I see my wife driving down my driveway
in her car, it could be someone else with the same exact model car. But like the odds are,
it's the person who lives here in my house. And really, we don't, you asked doesn't share those
Tomahawks with anybody. I said, they're in the Australians. Yeah, one of them had, yeah,
right. Like one of them sold it to anyway. But like, but I got to say, I mean,
it does seem to me to be just up there with the one of the most truly despicable things
that I've ever seen a president do. And obviously, like it's like morally speaking, the murdering of
a bunch of young children is the morally worse, but the way for Donald Trump just when no one
else would even back him up in his own government, he just started saying it was the Iranians who
did it. And then of course, as you know, that for those mentioned, I mean, some of them might be
bots or whatever, but like, yeah, a lot of a lot of right winners will just regurgitate whatever
Trump tells them, even though they sit there and go, oh, Mr. Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth,
he just said it was the Iranians and Pete Hegseth goes, we're investigating it because he doesn't
central command came out and went, it'd be inappropriate to comment on this, we're investigating,
like no one would back him up on this. He just said it was them. It's like, no, no, actually,
what happened is you just murdered a whole bunch of like eight year old girls, man. Like it just
the most disgusting goddamn thing. And you know, they're saying the report you were referring to
that the New York Times put out just a few hours ago. You know, they're saying it was an accident
and like, okay, you know, I would even Scott as fierce critics as we are of this of the regime
in DC. I would still want to believe that that like they weren't intentionally trying to kill the
children of like some IRGC guards or whatever. But honestly, I mean, really when we're talking about
it, the bottom line here is like, none of that really matters. It just doesn't really matter. In
fact, it wouldn't really have mattered if it was an Iranian missile that accidentally went off
and did this. The thing is, man, you launch a war of choice and you start dropping bombs on densely
populated cities. And when a bunch of kids die as a result to a fucking war of choice, a war of
aggression, that's on you. Like Benjamin Netanyahu, the first and foremost Donald Trump, second
Benjamin Netanyahu, third after that, every goddamn member of this administration who fucking,
you know, even if Tulsi Gabbard did war, she hasn't resigned and discussed.
JD Vance hasn't resigned and discussed. That's enough for me to say you're guilty, too.
You guys all just murdered 175 little girls and then have fucking sat there while they lied about it.
And think about what that means to them. I mean, this is a Oklahoma City bombing,
working on casualties. Only if Oklahoma building, the Murrow building had been all day care.
Right. And already the fact that there was a daycare in that building was just huge. I
forget the exact moment. It was 20 something, you know, children were killed in that thing.
And that made that, I mean, September 11th and everything since this kind of all washed that away
in whatever a lot of people listen to this. Maybe we're too young to remember. Let me tell you,
the Oklahoma bombing was the biggest deal in the world, man. It was the biggest massacre in
America since Second Wounded Knee. You know, it was worse than Waco by double. And it was just a
catastrophe, man. And then and also, you know, think about the Pearl Harbor attack, the sneak attack
there. What if they had hit a girl's school and the Japanese had killed 168 175 little girls
at a school? And that was part of the story of Pearl Harbor when FDR gave his day of infamy speech
the next day. He mentioned, oh, yeah. And they killed 175 little girls at their school in their
sneak surprise attack. That would still be a part of the Pearl Harbor story. It would be in the,
you know, a major aspect of the Cuba good in junior movie, right? And it would be a major part
of the way that we tell that story 85 years later. We still haven't forgotten Pearl Harbor,
still the biggest deal in the world here. You know, it's it's marked. I mean, not as a people just
people justify using atomic bombs and fire bombing cities based on Pearl Harbor still to this day.
A lot of people were killed. Yeah, it was for all combatants who were killed in that thing.
You know, as sad as it was, they were by their own commander in chief to be sacrificed as they were
still. But yeah, you're right. That was how they justified every bit of their war crimes
against that country in the aftermath. And just imagine, I mean, I don't know, like it's like
when Darryl Cooper talks about the Russians and he's like, I don't know how they're ever going to
get over this in 500 years, what we've done to them here. This is just God dang it's the same thing
here. Yeah, these are some big things you can't take back. That time you started a surprise
sneak attack in the middle of negotiations on false pretenses for a treacherous, completely
unworthy third nation and killed almost 200 little girls on the like opening night.
She's a man, you know, and then and also, I mean, look in the yes, next morning, you know what I mean?
Well, and even in the what I guess now seems to be the Israeli strike that killed the Ayatollah,
I mean, again, just like it seems like no one, I mean, you know, it's so I don't know, man,
it's so weird for me because like the knock on me, essentially after the last like year that I've
had, the only knock or whatever seems to be the Douglas Murray that you're not an expert,
you're just a comedian like this is ridiculous. I would like is fair enough, like that is true
about me, you know, but like the thing is that the entire expert class, you see no like
there's no wisdom, there's nobody who goes, ah, you know, yeah, like this, you know, murdering
an Ayatollah, Ayatollah. Oh, that's a pretty important thing to Shiite Muslims. Oh, and you
murdered his whole family with him, including like a baby, like that, like as if that somehow,
even in that strike, even not in the little girl's one, we're supposed to like be like, okay,
well that one was okay. It's okay that his family members get murdered with him and as you
were saying and channeling Darryl's point there, you're just like, you know, that is, that is some
toothpaste you can't put back in a tube, man. And that is, you got to think about this, not that
you can psychoanalyze perfectly any of these leaders, but the new Ayatollah, that is the world
that he's coming into, right? Like he's in power now and his family members have just been murdered
by the governments that you're at war with. This is, I don't know, just so, so incredibly dangerous
just to maybe advance the greater Israel project a bit, seems quite a calculation. All right,
guys, let's take a moment and think our sponsor for today's show, which is ultra, ultra pouches
are all the rage these days. I'm a pouch guy myself. Now, a lot of people don't like the nicotine
pouches and that's where ultra comes in. It's completely nicotine free, caffeine free. It's packed
with new tropics that are designed for mental clarity and enhanced focus. You get the same kick
as a nicotine pouch, but without the side effects, the buzz, the addiction, the jitters, the crash,
any of that stuff. Most pouches elevate cortisol, raise blood pressure and keep your body in a constant
stress state. Ultra pouches let you keep your pouches, but with a cleaner kick. So this is the
guilt free pouch delivering instant focus and mental clarity without nicotine or caffeine. And new
customers can use the promo code problem and get 15% off at take ultra.com that's take ultra.com
and for 15% off use the promo code problem. All right, let's get back into the show.
Well, look, I'll tell you, man, I'm really worried about the potential here and I'm not like
predicting this. I don't know how to put a, you know, measure on how likely it is exactly or what,
but there is a potential here for total catastrophe in the form of the Iatola Sistani or similar
declaring a holy war against the West and against the United States and Israel together. You
know, Ben Laden did not have a religious rank. He had respect because he'd been wounded in battle
and slept on the floor of the cave with the boys and things like that. And so people paid him,
you know, he's like a mafia boss. He was the boss of a crime syndicate where he had like this high
stature that people respected and people would do what he said, you know, kind of thing.
But he was not some kind of supreme unified religious leader of Sunni or Wahabi,
Salafi Muslims. It was a political thing. The Iatola Sistani could say, if you believe in God,
you have to fight. And there would be potentially tens of millions of people at war with the United
States and including and the, you know, American targets in the West. And as we've talked about
before and, you know, presumably your entire audience has discussed with their friends and their
living rooms or their pickup trucks before America. The world is lousy with soft targets, man. If
we're about war against legions of terrorists, then they can do significant damage. Now, I don't
know how many Shiite Muslims are in America or how loyal to the commands of the Iatola as they
may or may not be. But on the margin, there's probably some. And, you know, speed that first day when
they killed those little girls on that first day that, you know, they started on a Friday night,
Saturday night. The Senegalese American here in Austin grabbed his rifle and went down to
Sixth Street and killed three people and wounded 15 more before he was stopped and killed. And,
I mean, hell, dude, I didn't even know they had Shiites in Senegal. What do I know?
And, but this was just, there's no reason the world to think that anyone made him do this. He
decided he wanted to do this. He was going to, you know, play a walk on part in the war, right?
Is exactly what he did. And any asshole can do that. Anyone can start a force fire. Anyone can
hijack a gasoline truck and crash it into some people, you know, standing outside somewhere.
Anybody could take a rifle to this side of the security line at the airport. I mean, there's
a million of them in anybody can think of them. You could take a private plane and crash it into
a nuclear cooling tower. How about that one? You know, in the Northeast there, you look out the
window of a plane. You can see them everywhere. Those nuclear power plants, you just fly by sight
into one of them. And, and so, and I hate like, you know, piling on with the scare mongering where
you always hear these kind of tropes from the right wingers that, oh, has Bala, has sleeper
cells in America and all this. Well, you know, they could. And, and, and has Bala and, and,
you know, the IRGC and the koods force and all of that, like they are an organized state force,
you know, I mean, has Bala sort of the Iran's 51st state there in southern Lebanon. And, you know,
these guys wouldn't even necessarily have to have ever been sent here to be sleepers,
other than just de facto, that they decide that they want to take part now. And this is just
extremely dangerous. Our government is putting us in so much jeopardy here. And, you know, there's
already been fighting at the green zone in Baghdad. There's been strikes on American bases,
apparently not just from Iran, but from Iraqi has Bala, Qatib has Bala against American targets in
Erbil. We can have a real fight and hell, there could be a coup in Iraq where a hard-to-line pro-Iran
forces take power when, you know, it's already Iran's friends there, but you can have real Iranian
puppets take over in Baghdad and could cause, you know, major trouble for the United States there.
And I don't know, man, um, Shiite Muslims are a majority in the world, but they're about 50-50
in the Middle East. You know, there's still tens of millions of them. And if they're, you know,
and see Sunni's sort of, they'd pick their own Imam, right, like a Protestant Christian church.
They just kind of have their own reverend or whatever. But the Shiites are all organized,
like the Catholics in these hierarchies. And there's just a few Ayatollahs and Sistani in Iraq.
He's the guy that David Worms are wanted to tell his Bala to stop being friends with Iran
in the clean break day. He's the most influential Ayatollah in the world. He already had a higher
religious rank than comedy ever had. And so the potential that he has is like, you know,
lightning from the emperors fingers, man. If he wants to, yeah.
All right, you know, I just, you know, I still, I guess I maintain, like, hope in the best case
scenario here, which is that essentially Donald Trump will call this quits in a few days.
And that, you know, he will basically just start looking at how much damage we're taking,
how much this is affecting markets, his political career and all that. I mean, I, as I've said,
I've been on the record for this many times. I think he's already destroyed his presidency.
I just don't, like, this is the best case scenario is that Donald Trump just calls it quits and
then starts saying how amazing it was and how tremendous it was. I just don't see, you know,
I don't know. Obviously, Donald Trump has, he's got a track record of being the most hawkish
president on Iran, while also, you know, having a track record of rhetorically talking about how
we would never go to war with Iran and how would a disaster it would be and how these regime change
wars are terrible. But well, he has, there's been several points between Donald Trump's first
and then including the 12-day war where he kind of got us into a situation, but then took the
off-ramp when he had it. And there is, you know, a lot like when they shot down that drone,
he didn't respond, even though people were trying to get him to after they responded to him killing
Salmani that he took the off-ramp there. He took the off-ramp after the 12-day war.
He, there was good reporting that he was kind of trying to take an off-ramp after day one of this
thing and that through the Italian negotiators, they reached out to offer a cease-fire after they
killed the strike and the Iranians said, no, we're not doing so like the Iranians now seem to be like
the calculation has changed that he's now, he's changed the incentive structure for Iranian
self-preservation, whereas before their calculation reasonably was we can't touch the Americans because
then that'll kick off a war. Now their calculation also reasonably is we can't not touch the Americans
or they're going to keep doing this to us forever. We got to give them a bloody nose here.
That being said, Donald Trump could just leave even if Iran isn't going to negotiate with them.
But honestly, Scott, after all this stuff, I mean, look, there's been like 17 different BS
justifications for this war. But a big one of them was they killed 30,000 of their own people and
we're going to liberate the people. And Donald Trump unzipped his fly and put his two balls all
the way out there on the table when he announced with a baseball hat and no tie on that this is a
regime change. I don't know, dude, like, what do you think? Like, how is that possibly? How could
that even possibly work? If he just comes back now and you go, dude, you just blew like probably
probably over $10 billion at this point already. I saw a congressional estimate that said it was like
$5.6 billion in munitions already. I don't think they were days. Yeah, that was in the first few days.
And I don't even think that counted all the military hardware they moved around in order to get
there. And it didn't count any of the damage to any of our bases or targets like that or the
just the damage of like the lack of ships going through the straight of Hormuz just for 10 days has
caused. Yeah, yeah. Like it's like, so this is probably like in the tens of billions of dollars of
damage. You killed it. It's got to be over a thousand at this point. The last last estimate
I saw was over a thousand probably going to come out to be higher than that. Iranians dead.
We don't know how many people died in Tel Aviv in Jerusalem, but I presume Blason people died there.
And we lost, you know, we got what the latest number is whatever you said seven dead 150 wounded
something like that. This isn't Venezuela in other words. He can't just spin this. He can't just
come home and spin this as like clean and done. And that was that. And so that the fact that he
can't come back and spin it that way, that creates an incentive structure for us to not get the
best case scenario out of this and for them to actually do what the they were floating out about
two September or something like that really just try to decimate the regime. And of course,
it seems like that is certainly the Israeli goal in this that this isn't a regime change.
Allah, Iraq, Afghanistan. This is a regime collapse. Allah, Libya, Syria. All right, guys,
let's take a moment and think our sponsor for today's show, which is massive chips.
Everybody is talking about massive chips these days. It seems and hey, it's still kind of a new year.
And if you're trying to be healthy, this is a great little thing that you can start. Stop eating regular
chips and start eating massive. Massage chips contain just three ingredients. There's no seed oils,
no mystery chemicals, just real food. And these chips don't only avoid all the bad stuff. They're
genuinely really good tortilla chips. Snacking on massive chips is nothing like eating regular chips
with massive. You feel satiated light and energetic, no crash, bloat, or gross sluggish feeling
afterward. And because these chips are made with real food, they're more satiating. So you don't
find yourself uncontrollably binging and still feeling hungry like you do with those junky brands.
And if you love massive chips, you should definitely check out Vandy crisps. Vandy is massive
sister company. They make the most delicious three ingredient potato chip you will ever taste.
They're both real food. They're both delicious and they're, you know, you can know that you're not
putting all that garbage into your body with the stuff that you grab at the supermarket. So if you're
ready to give massive a try, go to massachips.com, M-A-S-A chips.com slash Dave and use the promo code
Dave for 25% off your first order or you can click the link in the episode description.
All right, let's get back into the show. Yeah. Well, you know, in Libyan Syria, they had
terrorists on the ground to support. And I think in this case, they really don't know. They've
talked about bringing in P jack. They dropped the J. I'm not sure why, but it's the party for a free
life in Iranian Kurdistan is the group. And they're communist. They're, you know, like the
Turkish PKK or the Syrian YPG. You know, I read a couple of stories about American talks with
Barzani and Taliban who were the main gangster leaders in Iraqi Kurdistan. They weren't even asking
the Peshmerga to join. They were just asking them to allow the communists to use their area as a
staging base and putting pressure on them. And that'll fill apart. Went nowhere. You know, you have
jundala, the Baluki suicide bombers from 15 years ago or whatever, but they're no force. And
you know, apparently they haven't done anything. There hadn't even been any attacks by ISIS,
who they do like attacking inside Iran from time to time. There hadn't been anything like that.
So, you know, in the case of Libya, Libya was created not even after World War I. It was
created after World War II. And it had always been these two or three major kingdoms and had been
cobbled together by Qaddafi's predecessor. And then he took power himself. He was the second
leader of the new country. And so when America, you know, took sides there, it was basically people
from the far east of the country rising up and, you know, majoring very much a geographical
battle of east versus west and moving westward, where it made logistical sense, operational sense
for not strategic, but right, right. Operational sense for American planes to fly as their
air cover and help them advance and take town after town after town as they advanced to the west
of the country and eventually sack to triple it, right? There's just nothing like that here.
And nobody believes that there is a force on the ground that they can do this with. I'll actually
did LOL this morning when I read in the Jerusalem post that the Shah Reza Palavi III or whatever
says, yeah, this is my final call for everybody to rise up and prepare for my arrival. Yeah, right,
dude. They parachute him and all his people in there. They're going to get mowed down and they
would have to parachute them in there. How else are they even going to get them in there? They
couldn't drive them in from any border or any shore. So they would have to parachute them in and
they would immediately be killed. And so they have, you know, no solution really whatsoever to enforce.
As you know, I talked with Robert Pate the other day who famously wrote those books about why
people become suicide bombers. It's the foreign occupation. He also is an expert on why air power
doesn't work alone anyway. And obviously air power is important, but you have to have a hammer
and an anvil. And I knew an old marine back in the 1990s taught me that listen, if your men
are not standing on street corners with their combat boots on the ground holding rifles and you
do not control that territory period. That's who controls the territory whose soldiers can stand
around there. And that ain't ever going to be America in Tehran. And so yeah, again, they
they talk Trump into somehow. Don't worry, man, they're just, remember, I'm sure you've heard
Netanyahu say this a thousand times, they're just waiting for somebody to hit him and they'll just
all ride over and all the people just rise up and it'll be great. But like, no, there's no real reason
to believe that. Yeah, that's right. And I got to say, there's a real, there's this crazy goddamn
dynamic of like where America, like the rough broad strokes deal of America for many years,
what kind of built modern America as we know it, is that like European refugees could escape
tyranny and then come over here and hope for like a better life with more opportunity and more
liberty. And somehow this idea got converted into, oh, you can come to America and then convince
us to go to war with the country that you're from to, you know what I mean, like free your, liberate
your people over there. And like the deal was always like, no, we were just, we were supposed to
try to have some liberty over here. We're not doing that great at that. But I do think there's
this, this, you know, a, a Sager and Jenny, who's fantastic. I love that guy, good friend.
He's a, he's been making this point a lot on breaking points. And I think it's a really like a
stupe one where there's this really like unholy alliance between the military industrial complex
and then their war hawks and then the like diaspora people, you know, and there's this real problem.
You know, it's just, if you've read enough about like just the terror wars, you know,
where there's chalibi or in this case, if it's the, the shaw's son or whatever, where you,
or just the people I'm arguing with on Pierce Morgan, some Iranian girl who's talking about around
who lives in Brooklyn, you know what I mean, who's lived there her whole like shit, these are
the most disconnected people from around. They don't like it's, it's, they, they, they, like,
they speak for a sliver of the population or what they told their kids about around, you know,
what I mean. And then they have this view. And I just learned a long time ago to like never trust
any of that shit, man. Like because for a few different reasons, number one, you don't live there.
You don't actually know what's going on. Any more than I know what's going on. Like it's be me
talking about like Germany because my grandfather lived there, but I don't know. That was 100 years
ago. And it's like, I've never been there. But then also, you know, the people obviously like,
if you get people who flee from a regime, that is a contaminated sample, sample of a study,
right? Like these are people who didn't like that regime. And so of course, they like to imagine
that that's the dominant sentiment in the same way that we like to imagine that everyone who
supported Donald Trump was against all these wars. But no, that's not actually everyone. That's
that's a percentage. But then they all convince you that, oh, everybody's going to love you if you
do this. And the problem is that, you know, I remember people used to point out that how unpopular
Saddam Hussein was. Yeah, the people don't actually love that. And that's totally true, right?
Saddam Hussein was wildly unpopular in his country. His country is 60% Shiites, but it'll
support Saddam Hussein. But that's not really the fucking issue. Now, is it the issue, the real
question is how are they going to respond when you kill 175 of their little girls? Like, and then
the other issue is like, okay, even if it's true that there's not a majority support,
by the way, there's not majority support anywhere for anything that any government does.
Democracy is all a big fucking illusion. They they had a study. What was it? It was in in Princeton,
I think, had that study where they concluded that we are a non-agarchy because they were literally
they like scientific. It was a peer reviewed study. They scientifically went through it and they go
the way the public feels about policy has no impact on policy. It's just not it doesn't matter.
Obama says we're going to close Guantanamo Bay. You go, I think I'll vote for that guy who's
going to close Guantanamo Bay. Doesn't doesn't now next up is well, do you want Mitt Romney?
Okay. So that's your only there's no choice in this matter. But so then you also have the
real dynamic here that like, even if it's not a majority who supports the Ayatollah, 92 million
people in a country, what percentage do? If it's 10%, that's a healthy insurgency you got on your
hands if the regime falls or people who are going to fight back before the regime falls. And so
these are good. Well, you were making, I'm sorry, because I don't think I addressed this point
earlier that you asked me about about the popular opinion there that yes, it's true that you have
liberals in the big cities. But that is not the case of the population of the country. It's just
the same as here out in the countryside or even in the suburbs, people vote right wing. And
you know, I'll never forget in July 2005, George W. Bush warned the people of Iraq, you better not
vote for the right winger in the election tomorrow. And then the next day they all voted for
Mark Mood Amidina Jop. That was where he came from and Bush helped him win. And it was like
widely agreed at the time that he got the Bush bump of 5% when he was, you know, when the people
were warned. And I guess he would have won anyway, but it's like, yeah, out in the countryside,
people are religious. On the countryside, people are conservative. On the countryside, people are
patriotic. On the countryside, no, they don't favor the North Americans and the fucking Israeli's
coming and bombing them to liberty. Are you kidding me? I was completely stupid. They have
stupid you got to be to think that, oh yeah, no, that actually could work. And I'm pretty sure
that that's what's going on here. You know, and on the exiles real quick, I'll refer your audience,
you can find this real easily because it's like in the lot of quotable websites and whatever,
they'll have a quote of Machiavelli from the Prince warning the Prince do not listen to exiles
when they tell you and agitate against their former country because the thing is one, they don't
really know anything. And two, they want to believe a lot of things and they want you to believe a
lot of things, true and untrue to get you to do what they want. And so you can not trust their
point of view. And the Iraq example is the best one because you had, you know, Troskyite
intellectuals like what's his name, Machia. And then you had the Iraqi National Congress,
which was supported by Tehran, led by the Iraqi Shiite exile, Ahmed Chalabi and all of his
Mary men. And they were the ones who won promise that, oh, man, it's going to be great. The people
of Iraq can't wait until you invade. And two, they were the ones who supplied most of the lies about
the weapons and mass destruction that they funneled through the office of special plans and the
Pentagon to the vice president's office, the White House and the media to push us into that war.
There's a mobile biological weapons labs and warehouses full of weapons and mass destruction.
And whatever it is you need, we've got Iraqi exiles here to tell you. That's right.
Non-government control planes can spray you with germs. Whatever it is that you need to be told to
get the American people to go for this. And you know, you bring it up and it's something that people
don't really talk about nearly enough. But this is just completely scandalous that the United States
is used this way. And our government apparently doesn't mind being used this way for its patriots
from other countries to come and be essentially pick themselves, invite themselves to be our
chosen sock puppets when we overthrow their regimes and install them in power instead.
It's completely crazy. And what the hell has become of us that this is what our country
is good for and is to be used for in the eyes of so many people in the world? It's sick, man.
Yeah, no, that's absolutely right. No, of course, there's all types. I mean, my understanding
of a chalabé was like from what I've read about it as my, the read I got on him was essentially
that he was just a con man. Like, I don't, you know what I mean? Like he was, he got like, he was an error.
Yeah, yeah, right. Well, he, what is he got a, was it in Lebanon? He got like these banking
charges in Jordan? Yeah, in Jordan. I'm sorry. That's right. It was in Jordan that he got like,
they basically like raised reserve requirements. And then we're like auditing the banks. And then
they found out he didn't have any of the result. Like he was just like all types of like fraud,
trouble and shit like that. And it was like, of course, once you start saying, well, you're going to
get the United States of America to put you in the seat of power. Well, then you've got a little
bit of a conflict of interest. That's a mighty big incentive for a lot of people to want to go
along with that. But yeah, I mean, look, I think like one of the almost like the knocks that people will
have on, on guys like me and you is they'll go, oh my God, not everything is the war in Iraq,
not everything has to be, you know, you can't like, and you guys are always living, you know,
back in 2003 or whatever. And it's like, well, look, man, there were lessons that were learned
from these things. And a lot of these lessons are like, like Iraq turned into a catastrophe for
reasons, for reasons that were predictable, reasons that were predictable by Dick Cheney,
who explained very clearly himself a few years prior, what would happen if we created that quagmire.
And like, as I was making this point on the show the other day, it's like, like this point about
exiles, this is a common theme amongst exiles. This point about blowback, it's a common theme.
You know what I mean, like, and the truth is that there is a there's, it's not, this is the way
I said it the other day, it's not like when you when you collapse a regime and or you overthrow a
regime and something bad comes next, something worse comes next, that's not just like, it's not like
in the war on terrorism, it's like, oh, we just we flipped a coin six times and it landed on
tails six times. But, you know, this next time it's still a 50-50, it's like, no, that happens
for reasons because you're going to start creating this amount of bloodshed, you're going to create
this amount of violence, who the hell is going to wrestle power in that environment? The Gandhi?
Like, you know, what are the odds that the person who comes away, who the people end up rallying
around is like the comorational guy. I mean, what are the odds of that? This is one likely.
Yeah, in the Obama years, you know, Samantha Power about Libya or maybe after the Obama years
was asked, well, man, you destroyed Libya, great-going lady, you know, and she goes, well,
look, it's not our fault that we didn't have a crystal ball to see what was going to happen.
And it's like, yeah, it is your fault that you launched an aggressive war without a crystal ball
to know what would happen. And so, yeah, and even my year or two, that I did on the film
Drew show, the weekend interview show back, it was April 12, 2003, three days after they pulled
down the statue of Saddam and Baghdad. And I interviewed Alan Bach about it. And he said, you know,
he quoted Aldous Huxley. And the quote was that violent and destructive means determine violent
and destructive ends. It's a great quote. You know, you should not be surprised. And I have to admit,
too, dude, like, as silly as this is, at the start of the thing and, you know, not like I ever
uttered the wrong thing out loud about it or whatever. But there's a part of me that does think that,
like, wow, I wonder if this is the one that will work out. You know what I mean?
There's that in zero here. All his words have been total catastrophes. And people are always
going, what would it take for you to admit that, like, we have a way better circumstance in the
post, Ayatollah regime in Iran, dude. And whatever, like, well, we sure ain't to that better
circumstance yet. But part of me has to wonder, like, geez, maybe this is the one. And then,
no, of course not. They go into the first thing they do is bomb a school full of little kids.
The second thing they do is go, ah, geez, I guess Ayatollah's son is the new Ayatollah. And then
I got to wedge this one in here somewhere. And people double check me on this. I beg you to go
read the Wall Street Journal. And you'll have to click four or five different ones to see,
because sometimes they're more just objective assessments of things. But you will find in there
in the Wall Street Journal, just type in Komeni, not Komeni, Komeni, grandson at the Wall Street
Journal. And you'll see where administration officials are saying they preferred the previous
Ayatollah's grandson to the last Ayatollah's son. That was who they thought might be a good moderate
to take over the new government in Iran, which just goes to these people. No idea what they're doing
at all. They're just throwing darts in the dark. And a massive country, the size of a couple of
Texas's, is it? And even like your crystal ball line, not to be confused with crystal ball of
breaking points, I mentioned, say a second ago. It's like, yeah, dude, you launch a war of choice,
a war of aggression. Not only do you not have a crystal ball, you're openly admitting,
you don't even have a plan. You don't even have like a, it's not even like they're going,
this is a long shot, but here's our plan. You know what I mean, they have nothing. They're all
on record. We just have nothing. I mean, this is, as I got to wrap up here, Scott, but this is to me
and look, I'm like with you would people say that if they go, what result would make you say,
oh, this worked out? Like, I don't know if it worked out, I'd acknowledge that it worked out.
I don't know. If I, if literally they went in there and the people rose up and a reasonable,
you know, liberal, and I mean, this in the classical sense of the word, like a reasonable,
somebody who, you know, reasonable rose up and things were just much better and the region was
calm down. I'd go, ah, shit, you know, you launch seven wars of choice, six of them were catastrophes.
You fucking got one at the end. Yeah, I still don't think it's a wise policy. I don't think it's
worth the risk. I don't think America should be doing this on, on moral and philosophical
grounds, but I'll admit if it worked out, it worked out. But like, when the fuck do you admit
that you don't ever get to open your mouth again in public? Would we need one more catastrophe?
And then you'll do it. I mean, it's just too crazy. But I will say this and then I'll give you the
last word. I really do feel like this bite quite a long shot. I think that of all the wars that I've
been alive for, which goes back to Persian Gulf war or whatever. This is the worst, the worst,
most incoherent sales pitch for any of them, like literally for any of them. I mean, even if you go,
like, look in, in Iraq, obviously, they had weapons of mass destruction. Okay, if that were true,
okay, you could kind of see where, if it were true that he was friends with Osama bin Laden,
and he was developing nukes or had nukes or whatever, and right after 9-11, okay, at least you could
understand that. Gaddafi is about to go genocidal. Okay, I mean, like all these things are lies,
but at least they're, they're plausible, you know, Assad is using chemical weapons on his own people,
whatever, you know, all this bullshit. This is like, they're not even trying. It's not a war,
but we've been at war for 47 years. Remember our Marines in the 80s or their nuclear ambitions,
which we totally obliterated six months ago, but they could have had a nuke in a week.
You know, like just everything about this. He's like just so insane, dude. Yeah, I know.
Well, and look, and I think people are noticing that I know the polls say Republican voters
support their president. That's Paul Maga, Maga Republican voters, and we define Maga as the
people who still support Donald Trump. Yeah. And 100% of the people who support this support this.
Yeah, it's yeah, the coalition that Maga Republicans, how many Maga Republicans are there now
compared to a year and a half ago? Yeah, I saw one poll recently that said today, if you could
vote again for Kamala Harris for Donald Trump, she was up almost 10 points to think she was up
nine points. Now, I'm not just saying like maybe that wouldn't be exactly right, but she was behind
in the polls when the actual election happened. So anyway, sorry, major defecions. Yeah, for sure.
And look, yes, because of the total incoherence of their argument, because it's so obvious,
it's 100 times more obvious than it was 25 years ago about the role of Israel in pushing.
Yes, yes, and all that. And so, yeah, I think, you know, public opinion is going to be, you know,
strong, you know, in our favor here. And hopefully we'll push to have this thing, you know,
wrapped up soon and later. As you said, the Iranians have a vote in that. They might keep
fighting. Donald Trump tries to back out. They might not let him for a while. And I don't know
how that might work or what, but it is a hell of a thing, man. And I hate to say I told you so,
but I and I hate to say also that I tried for 20, 25 years to stop this thing. I couldn't
it ended up happening. Anyway, you know, despite a mind and a lot of other people's efforts to
get the truth out there. I mean, when it comes to Donald Trump, he just doesn't give a damn.
He was there not a lot to have nuclear weapons. And then he bombs their civilian nuclear
program where he doesn't care. He cares less for the real world that he's living in, even then
W Bush, I think. And so that's just the world that we're living in. But let me end with a short
pitch, which is for people who want to know the facts about Iran, we're going to go ahead and post
the Iran section of my course from the Scott Horton Academy at the facts about Iran.com.
So check that out there. Great. Yeah, that's a great idea. All right, definitely everybody,
go check that out. I know, I know I will. Well, Scott, thank you so much for your time, man. It's
just always, it's always great talking to you during moments like this to help us all understand
the world a little bit better. Of course, guys, go, go subscribe right now if you don't already
to the Scott Horton show and to provoke. And of course, if you want to keep up with what's going
on anti-war.com is really the best resource for that. And of course, Libertarian Institute and
the Scott Horton Academy definitely go check that out. If you do the, do the truth about Iran
stuff, but go sign up for the whole Academy, man, because there's so much great stuff in there.
All right. Thank you, Scott. Thank you for everyone listening. Catch you next time. Peace.
Hey, it's Howie Mandel and I am inviting you to witness history as me and my Howie do it gaming
team take on Gilly DeKing and wallow 267's million dollars gaming in an epic global gaming league
video game showdown four rounds, multiple games, one winner plus a half time performance by
multi platinum artist, Travis McCoy. Watch all the action and see who wins and advances to the
championship match against Neo right now at globalgaming league.com. That's globalgaming league.com.
Everybody games.
Part Of The Problem



