Loading...
Loading...

All right, there's a couple of news items I've not gotten to the past couple of days here
that I really want to want to dive into today. Good afternoon, everybody. Nice to see you. I mean,
I can say that to you guys here. Nice to see all of you, but I can't say nice to see the others
because I can't see them. But it's nice to be with you. How about if I say it that way? It's a
pleasure to be with you on this fine, fine afternoon. And there's much going on, much that we haven't,
that we just haven't, I don't want to say we haven't taken the time or I don't want to say we
have, we don't have the time, but we haven't really necessarily taken the time to dive into some of
these because, you know, we prioritize things. History class is very important. And we definitely
prioritize history class. We've got to get to it, got to get to it when it's time we go there.
So some of these reports I've not gotten to, but today I want to get to them. And one of them has
to do with the legal system. The other has to do with the medical system and they all affect our
kids, both of them, both stories here affect our kids. The first one, let's go to the legal world
first. Oh, yes, let's go there first because this is groundbreaking. This we've been expecting this
anticipating it. The Supreme Court has come out and they have blocked California's policy
concealing gender identity changes from parents. Yes, that's true. The Supreme Court has said,
no, you can't hide this from parents. Parents and teachers had asked the high court to rule on the case
after a federal appeals court had reinstated the state policy. We have this continual battle
by the way, going on between the appellate courts and the Supreme Court. Because the appellate
courts, I mean, some of them are just laced and loaded with leftists. I mean, the circuit court
is packed. It's not just nine justices. I know there's more than nine. And I don't quite frankly,
I don't know if every, if every appellate court has the same, if they all have 18 sitting judges,
I think I'm going to look that up because I'm intrigued. But there's certainly more packed
than the Supreme Court. And there's this constant battle that it would appear where the Supreme
Court is slapping down some court of appeals somewhere. And it's the case here. This case, this
ruling came out last week where the Supreme Court blocked the California policy that prohibits
school personnel from notifying parents when students requested changes to their
documented gender identity at school. And this was happening without permission. Parents
didn't know about this. The policy said that if students didn't give the teacher's permission
to notify their parents, that the teachers would not notify their parents. Since when did you
ask a student to give you permission to do something? Is this the, the, the backwardsness of this,
of this policy? No, you can't do that. The student didn't give you permission.
What? I can't, so I can't tell the student or I can't tell the parent. Johnny wants to be
Janie and wants to be called Janie at school because Johnny's last, Janie didn't give me permission
to tell the parent. Uh, who's, who's running the asylum here? Who's in charge of the school building
here? So what if Johnny doesn't give me permission to tell his parents what grade he got on the test?
Can I not do that? Oh, no, that's fine. No, no, no, no, that's fine. You can do that. I mean,
the parents know Johnny's stupid anyway, so go ahead and tell them you got enough. But they don't
know he wants to be a girl, so you can't tell them that. I mean, does that?
Ah, all right. Johnny's not stupid, probably. I mean, in this scenario, he is because, well,
I mean, the reasons are obvious, aren't they? I just, um, to meet the policies backwards,
I don't know that you give the kids permission. Let me say it this way, I don't know you give the
kids authority to be in charge of the school and tell you as the teacher and as the administration
what you can and cannot do and what you are allowed to tell and not to tell their parents.
It's full disclosure. When a parent puts a child in school, it's full disclosure. All right,
the school tells the parent everything. Everything that the child says does or did everything.
Until the parent calls and says, look, enough's enough. I can't take it anymore. Stop telling me how
brilliant my child is. Just stop it. Just stop. I can't psychdrop here. I can't take the winning
so much winning my child so brilliant. I can't just just stop telling me how fantastic they are.
Usually it's the other way around. Usually it's the parent just becomes, you know, we just put a call
home. Hey, Johnny did this. Johnny did that. Johnny did the other. And then the parent just becomes
overwhelmed with the inundation of all the updates as to what Johnny's doing and they're like,
can you give me some good news, please? I mean, there is that. Look, my point is that the students are not in
charge. The parents are in charge. And by proxy, they have put the staff in charge and then the staff
in this case in California, they've abdicated their responsibility and turned it over to the kids
without telling the parents. Kind of like Congress right now abdicating their responsibility and
turning it over to the the alphabet bureaucracy where they will then allow the EPA to make rules
and regulations that pass as laws and and the health department and the CDC and the you name it.
Everybody else is out there restricting the people. It's it's really really the same thing.
It the the objective is to remove the sovereignty of the citizen. That's the objective.
The objective is to make the people feel like they are no longer in control. They never were in
control. They never will be in control. This is this is the playbook. This is right out of Marxism 101,
by the way. This is right out of the first page. And it's it's what we see happening in these institutions
throughout the country, no matter what they are, but you know, particularly here in in California
education, we see it happening. Parents and teachers had asked the high court to rule on the case
Marabelli Vibanta. Banta of course would be the attorney general here in California,
who is all all for this. Banta is all about making sure the parents don't know what their kids are
doing. He's he is 100% on board this game. The the ruling here here here's how the the ruling was
awarded here from the Supreme Court. Plaintiffs alleged that California's policies permitted disclosure
of a student's gender transitioning at school, only if the student consented. Plaintiffs claimed
that these policies violated their rights under the free exercise clause of the First Amendment
and the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. All right, so California's policy
is permitting disclosure of students gender transitioning transitioning at school.
Only if the student consents or in other words the disinformation will be disclosed to the parents
only if the student says yes, only if the student gives the green light to do it.
Placing the student in complete charge, placing the student in complete authority and parents
here in this case are saying, hey, no, this is violating our rights under the free exercise
clause of the First Amendment because our deeply held religious beliefs go against these actions
that you are you are hiding from us. Number one, and the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.
As parents, we deserve due process.
The ruling continues. We conclude that the parents who seek religious exemptions are likely to
succeed on the merits of their free exercise claim. Parents and teachers, this was a six to three
decision, by the way, probably the three leftist ladies on the court voting no in the six.
The six who members of the six, you don't know which way they're going to go, but in this case,
they they cited correctly. So in the six to three ruling, they have said that it's likely
that the parents would succeed on the merits of their free exercise clause claim.
Parents and teachers requested that the Supreme Court blocked the California policy as litigation
unfolded. The justice has only granted relief to the parents. So there's some interesting notes here.
The parents aren't alone in this case. There are teachers here in California, public school teachers
who get it. They understand what the state is doing is wrong. They understand what the state is
doing is evil. And they are citing coming up alongside of these parents and they're saying, look,
we're all being put in a horrible position here. This isn't right that the kids should be in charge
of the school building, because essentially that's what's happened. The kids are in charge.
And once you put the kids in charge, by golly, you're in trouble. You're not going to last long.
So the the high court in this case cited a previous landmark ruling that it issued
just last summer, 2025. They are now citing themselves in Mahmoud V. Taylor in this six to three decision
that justice is, of course, said that parents had a constitutional right to control the religious
upbringing of their children. This was the case in Maryland, Montgomery County, Maryland, where
parents ensued their school district, the biggest school district in the state, by the way,
right after being denied the right to excuse their their elementary children. Kenny
Garden through fifth grade. I just let that sink in for a minute. They wanted to remove their
kids from being exposed to LGBT material at school. Kenny Gardeners, first and second graders.
And the school district said, no, no, you can't. I mean, I know we told you that we could.
Or that you could, but not the answers. No. Why? Because we want your children exposed to this
material. This is the point. This is the name of our game here. We want your kids exposed,
because eventually they will become this. And they will hold you as parents and your religious
faith and high disregard. Because we have the ability to shape their hearts and minds. We're with
them more than you are. And yes, we're going to shape their hearts and minds and we're going to
shape them against you. If that's not the point here, I don't know what is. And the Supreme Court
of course, sided with with the parents of Montgomery County. Again, the three leftist ladies in
that decision did not side with the parents. They sided with the school districts saying, yes,
the school district had every right to not allow those parents to pull their, their
Kenny Gardeners, their elementary age student out of homosexual content. Let that sink it.
Two parent plaintiffs in this case, Maribelio Vibanta, who have religious objections to gender
transitioning, were not told by their daughter's school when she began using a male name and
pronouns in the seventh grade. Everybody knew, everybody in the school building knew, but
mom and dad didn't know. They didn't know what was happening. They should have known.
The parents should have been in the loop. The teachers should have come to them immediately.
But again, it's the same situation that it wasn't in Montgomery County. The teachers in this
particular case and in that case, they didn't want the parents to know. They were on board this
transition. Now, I can't say that I shouldn't say I shouldn't paint such a broad brush against the
teachers here because as I previously mentioned, there are teachers that are acting as plaintiffs
in this Maribelio Vibanta case. There are teachers who have come alongside the parents and have
said, we're on board with you. You have the right. So forgive me for painting such a such a broad
brush. I'll say it this way. Some of the teachers there are on board. Some of the teachers
like it. They like that the parents don't know what's going on. Well, others do not. It's a split
situation here. So these two parents of this middle school girl were not told that she was using
a male name and male pronouns in the seventh grade. School officials did not tell them during
parent teacher meetings according to the ruling. The parents only learned about school officials
encouraging and there it is. There's the word encouraging encouraging their daughter's transition
when she began her eighth grade year and that's when she attempted suicide and was hospitalized.
And they encouraged it. School personnel was not only encouraging the daughter
to move forward with her transition. They were actively keeping it hidden from parents.
Now again, there were there are some teachers who aren't who are forced by the state to actively
keep it hidden. But forced against their will as it were coerced. And so that's why and they're
not in they're not in agreement with it. They don't want to partake in this. And many of them have
stood up. And that's why there are teachers that are on board with this lawsuit.
But it's interesting because they'll say you have to go through with this transition. They'll
convince parents. You have to go through with this transition because if you don't your your
son or daughter is going to commit suicide. And they guilt the parents in many cases. You know
this to be a fact. You've heard parents report this. They guilt them in many cases to go along
with the transition. But in this case, the parents didn't know what was happening until after
the daughter attempted suicide. And then all of this came out. It all came to light.
The daughter spilled the beans that that the school was encouraging her to transition. And
also keep it hidden from from parents. All right. So think about this. If you have a son or daughter
and they're middle school aged, you know you know their their minds are two things. They're impressionable
and they're not fully developed. And they're not even close to being fully developed. They're not
even yes, they're at the age of reasoning. They're at the age of of rational. But because they're
they're so impressionable that rationale can be contorted. It can be manipulated. It can be
it can be directed and steered down a path. That is not healthy for them. And that's what we
fight happening here. And in this case, that is what was happening. This seventh grader was being
encouraged by school personnel to to go down this path. And it's not a healthy path.
I'm telling you it's not that the path of further confusion is not a path of health.
It's not a path of hope. It's not a path of well-being. It is nothing but a path of destruction.
And the parents don't discover this until after until after she's attempted suicide.
All right. I'm looking at the clerk. I'm going to apply this here. I want to get more into this
into this case, into this ruling, into this situation because it's important for for where we're
going. It's important for where we're headed as a country. It's important to know
that there's a break in the road here. And we're about to take a hard right as a as a country.
We are in the process of taking a hard right away from Marxist can confusing ideology. And it's
important. We've got to do this. We absolutely have got to do this. You know what else we've
got to do? We and we are doing here. By the way, we're celebrating 250 years of American
independence. Glorious American independence. And on top of that, we're celebrating 10 years
of America out loud. And we're going to celebrate it in style this summer July 2nd, July 3rd,
July 4th in Nashville, Tennessee. And we hope that you join us. We are formally extending
an invitation to you to join us in Nashville. You will hear fantastic speakers, including
yours truly. You will eat delicious food. You will experience wonderful entertainment.
A fireworks show second to none. That's what I hear, by the way, it's second to none.
And it's just going to be a really great time. So go to americaoutloud.news. See what you've
got to do to get yourself registered. But you've got to hurry because this event will sell out
tickets are not going to be around for much longer. So I implore you to do it. Get there.
Get to Nashville. All right, my friends. More of this case on the other side of this break.
Let's get real. Let's get loud on America loud. Talk news. Yes, this is Dr. Peter McCulloch.
And I'm personally inviting you to join me in Nashville. On July 2nd, 3rd and 4th for
historic experience in 2026. America loud news, 250 slash 10 Nashville. Along with clear and
the wellness company, we're celebrating two big milestones, 250 years of America and 10 years
of America loud news. I'm calling all Patriots to this historic weekend with inspiring entertainment,
incredible fireworks and nationally recognized speakers who probably stand for freedom. I would
love to see you there because your presence matters and you are family now is the time to get
together and we can exchange ideas, answer your questions and enjoy fellowship. Join us and
register now at americaoutloud.news forward slash Nashville. That's americaoutloud.news forward slash
Nashville. See you there. In just two minutes per day, you could reclaim your health and cut your
grocery bill in half with one simple convenient product. Our doctor formulated green 85 juice
formula's powerful dose of ultra concentrated essential nutrients stops hunger in its tracks and
supplies your cells with what's missing in the grocery store food. Go to chemicalfreebody.com
forward slash out loud today, get nature super multivitamin green 85, empower your immune system,
cut down on your grocery bill and save 20% on your first order. Have you been looking for a healthy
snack from the go? Well, not all energy bars are soft and sugary. Bear bars or a crunchy savory bar
made from just six simple natural ingredients. Bear bars are plant based organic gluten free,
contain six grams of protein and are low temperature dried for a unique crunch. Most energy bars are
based on chocolate or fruit and are held together with serps or sweeteners to learn more. Just visit
barebar.com slash out loud. Feeling off lately, bloated brain fog low energy. It could be parasites.
The sound vaiders so we can your gut immune system and mental clarity. That's why doctor Peter
McCullough and the doctors at the wellness company formulated ivermectin and mebendizoclents
and medical grade solution designed to help eliminate parasites and restore balance. No gimmicks,
just real medicine trusted by top doctors. Go to twc.health forward slash out loud and use code
out loud for 20% off your first order. Take control of your health today.
Have you tapped into the wellness farms yet? Pastor raised nutrient rich beef delivered straight
from trusted US ranchers right to your door. Nor hormones, no antibiotics, no middlemen.
Elevate your meals and your health with clean flavor first nutrition and by the way,
when you subscribe to wellness meats, you'll get 20% off with every reoccurring order.
Just use code AOL at checkout. This is exclusive to America out loud listeners and it doesn't
even have to be the wellness meats. You've got your favorite wellness company products, I'm sure.
But the wellness meats is listening to something that we should all be interested in.
Getting grass fed, hormone free, antibiotic free meat with no middlemen. Let's just have
good delicious farm to table as it were. Good delicious farm to table meat and let's get it
20% off with every order when you subscribe to wellness meats. All right, just check it out.
Go to America out loud.shop. Use coupon code out loud. Our friends at the wellness company,
by the way, are also sponsoring the 25010 this summer in Nashville. The wellness company in clear
in conjunction with America out loud. And listen, we want you to be there. We do. We hope that you
will make plans to join us. All right, back to this Supreme Court case.
And the situation here, we last left the heroes of this story, which would be the parents.
And that they were unaware that their daughter was being encouraged by school officials to transition.
And to refer to herself as a male name and to go by male pronouns.
And in her eighth grade year, she attempted suicide and she's hospitalized. And at this point,
this thing comes to light and the doctors diagnose her with gender dysphoria.
The teenager is in and out of the hospital after her initial suicide attempt.
And even with that being the situation, school officials continued calling her by a boy's name.
And they continued using male pronouns, even after the fact. This is according to court
documents. They continued walking her down this road of confusion. This poor girl, she is,
she's at a point in time in her life where, yes, confusion sets in. And when it's encouraged by
trusted adults, it makes it a thousand times worse. Because then the child doesn't know what to
believe or who to believe. Should they believe biological truth?
Should they believe or hold to the beliefs, the deeply held religious beliefs of their parents?
Or should they believe that teacher that they've developed a relationship with,
who they've come to know and love and trust and who would not lead them astray and who's
telling them, look, you got to be Johnny because that's, you know, God made a mistake. And you're born
in a boy's body and you just, you got to go after it and you got to make these changes on your
own. And it starts with you calling yourself Johnny. And that confusion only intensifies to the
point where now she's attempting suicide. And the parents are made to believe. And again,
I said this in the first segment, the parents are made to believe that if they don't go along with
it, if they don't go along with the game and with the charade, the child will act on,
on their suicidal thoughts and tendencies. And the exact opposite is true that if the child
continues down this road of confusion, that's when suicide will kick in.
So even after the fact school officials are still, are still playing this game,
still playing this charade. Eventually the parents put their daughter in therapy.
And they began psychiatric care for her, which is actual help. I guess it depends on who your
therapist is and who your counselor is. But it's a step into actual help here.
California state officials have issued guidance directing teachers at public schools to not tell
parents if their children began going by a different name and a different gender unless the students
give them permission. Policy also required teachers to use those new names and pronouns when
parents were not around. The teachers had to talk about compelled speech. This is it right here.
This is chorus of speech. You're telling me you are robbing me as an adult teacher in that building.
You are robbing me of my first amendment right. And you're telling me I have to refer to this
little girl as a boy. You're also robbing me of biological truth. When I know in fact this little
girl is not a boy. You're forcing me to refer to her as such. This is the Emperor's new close.
This is it. We're living in it. Lawyers for the state had argued that the policies were meant
to give children a safe learning environment and ensure that they can learn without fear of being
out into their parents before they are ready. So it's based on fear. It's based on what could happen.
It's based on a lot of ifs. The policy is centered around and formulated by ifs. If that's it.
It's if if the child is out too soon and then they will things will go bad.
And if they're not out and they can learn and not be in an environment of fear.
So not only is the policy horrible based upon what could happen. But it's centered around fear.
Which everybody knows is a powerful emotion. It's a powerful manipulating tool to make people afraid.
You make them afraid and by golly you own them. You got them right where you want them.
This is why teaching virtue is so important. It's why teaching courage in the face of fear is such an
important quality to have. Because if you have courage to stand up to the fear or to stand up to what
might be producing the fear in others then then you can overcome. Then you have the ability
to actually overcome. We talked about this the other day. We talked about
Ulysses S. Grant's ability to overcome. To overcome in the face of fear.
He didn't focus on his. And again this is why history class is so important. This is why an education
is so important. It's why giving our kids a proper education is so important. I mean it's just
something as simple as the life of General Grant before he became President Grant.
He had failed at almost everything he had set out to do. He failed at farming. He was a decent
soldier but anything that required something other than being a soldier he just did he failed that.
Four years before he is made general of the Union Army, head general, lead commander.
Four years prior he is on the street corner, something firewood just to keep his family from
starving to death. I mean people believed him to be a loser. They believed him to be a
drunkard. They had a whole lot of different thoughts and feelings and beliefs about Grant.
But when Lincoln needed a general with some backbone, when Lincoln needed a general who was not
going to be afraid of Lee and not power and fear, he went to Grant and he pulled Grant out of the
ash heap and he said go get him, Tiger. I don't know if he called him Tiger but and that's what
Grant did. Grant went after it and he did not falter in the face of fear. He did not buckle under
the pressure of his past. He did not believe the naysayers. He did not believe the detractors.
He believed what he knew to be true that he had the ability to lead and if given the opportunity
he would rise to that challenge and he would lead and he was given the opportunity and he rose
to the challenge and he led in the face of fear, stared fear in the eye and demanded,
demanded unconditional surrender. He didn't back down. He didn't buckle. He demanded
unconditional surrender. And these are the lessons that that we need to teach young people,
especially young people that are going through dark times, dark times of confusion.
Listen, this isn't this isn't to make them feel shame for themselves. This isn't to make them feel
shameful or guilty about what they're experiencing or about what they're going through.
It's the exact opposite. It's to give them the tools to overcome it. It's to give them the tools to
rise above it, to rise above the dark times. Listen, if we were studying the 23rd
Psalm at all in school anymore, which we used to, we used to study the 23rd Psalm, but if we were
doing it, we would understand that even though we walked through the valley of the shadow of death,
we should fear no evil. Why? Because thou art with me. You're right, you're staff. They come from me.
Because we used to believe and teach and let our kids know that there was a God who loved
them and who cared about them. And even though they were walking through dark times, even though
they were walking through a valley of a shadow of death, they could rise above the fear.
They could rise above the fear that that valley presented them because God is with them.
And God is bestowing upon them. Courage. He's bestowing upon them. Hope, faith, love,
fortitude, the prudence and the ability to go after a thing, to fight, fear,
stare it in the face and conquer it. This is why we read to them when they're little. These important
stories of knights and lords and ladies, facing off with dragons, facing off again. This is why
Baalwuff is such an important story because the people who cower in fear at Grendel and his mother,
but it takes someone with the courage of Baalwuff to come along and to say, hey, do or die, I'm going
after it. That used to be the attitude. Do or die, I'm going after it. I would rather die in battle,
than then live as a coward and live, you know, shaking and quaking and fear.
These stories are important because they instill something in us. They instill something in our
young people. They instill a virtue that gives them the ability to face life had on.
No, we're not telling them to go get a sword and go out there and fight pretend dragons or
I mean, if that's what you think you're missing the point, there's something deeper being instilled
in them and maybe they don't own an actual sword. I don't own, by the way, an actual sword.
I wish I did. I do. I wish I owned a sword. I wish somebody taught me the sword.
I wish I knew how to fence and I wish I had some swords. I just think it'd be really cool to have
that skill. I mean, it's not something I would show off or, you know, break out my sword in public.
I think it would be a lot of fun, but my point is I don't own a sword,
but yet growing up as a boy and being read those stories and reading those stories myself
and reading those stories to my son, it instills something in us. You know, I've got an important,
I didn't mean to go down this rabbit trail here, but I think it's important,
and I've got a very important interview coming up. I haven't conducted it yet, and when I do,
I will let you know, obviously, but it's an important interview with a lady who
her mission, and I don't want to give it away right now, but this interview is coming down the
pike. Her mission is to encourage men to read to their sons and the importance of men
reading to their sons. And when I heard this story, a friend of mine was telling me about this
moment's story and about the importance of this mission that she's on and encouraging fathers to
read to their children, and not only just their sons, but their children, their daughters as well.
And it struck an herb with me because when my kids were young, I read to them,
and you know what we started on? You know what we started reading, and I said to Elizabeth and
Joshua, I said, you guys want to read the Hardy Boys, because I had the Hardy Boys series up till,
I don't know, I think maybe book 30, when they were all hardcovered. Before they went to paperback,
I decided the paperbacks were lame, and it was, you know, it's unfair of me to decide that the
Hardy Boys paperbacks are lame. I just loved the hardcover books. I loved the artwork on the cover,
loved it all. And I think I have every hardcover and paperback up to book number 30. And I mean,
I might be missing one or two, but I read them as a little boy, I don't know, 10, 11, 12,
I fell in love with them when my mom and dad would go on trips, they would bring back a Hardy
Boy book for me. And so I built up this library, and I kept it. And when Joshua and Elizabeth
are little, I don't know, he's probably five, maybe she's seven or eight. We were downstairs,
and they saw my, you know, my books. And I said, but you guys like me to reach the Hardy Boy books.
I read these when I was little. And would you like that? And they're like, yeah, read the Hardy Boy
books. It'll be great. So we started the Hardy Boy books. And Elizabeth didn't really hang with
us for very long. I mean, she was interested in this, and the story when Kelly Shaw was around,
in Chet's sister, what was her name? Iona, Iona Morton, maybe I don't know. So when Kelly
and Chet's little sister were in the story, then Elizabeth would run, well, you know, she would
want to stick around, but she didn't last very long because, you know, there wasn't enough female
action, I guess. But she stayed with us for a little bit. But Joshua stayed with me through the
entire series. And then when that series was done, he was like, well, what else are we reading?
And so then we read the Chronicles of Darnia, and he was like, what else are we reading? And then we
read Little Bridges, and he was like, what else are we? And then we just, we started reading whatever
we could get our hands on. We started reading biographies. We started reading scientific books about
the brain and how the brain works. And it just, and this went on, this probably went on into his
high school years. From the time he was five, maybe a decade, maybe until he was 15, 16, I don't
know. There was probably even longer because I do, I would say probably even to leave as a senior
in high school, I was reading to him. Now, with that plan, it wasn't every night. It wasn't
that you're going to read me a story. It was, you know, we were involved in a series and he just
liked it when I would read. And these, but the stories of choice were stories that were instilling
something, stories that were encouraging, that were encouraging, not confusion, but encouraging
valor, and encouraging something that instills in us the ability to stand up in the face of fear.
And I'm telling you, there's something to this. There is something very important about it.
And as parents, if we can, if we can grasp it, we can get a hold of it,
especially while our kids are young. If we can get a hold of this while our kids, while our
children are young, and start instilling in them, stories from the great books, stories, and they
don't even have to be from the great books. I mean, it's great that they're from the great books,
you know, the hardy boys are not listed in the in the great books library. Okay, they're not up
there with Homer and Virgil and Dante. Okay, they're not there. But nonetheless, they're instilling.
They instill a courage. They instill a valor. They instill things that are important.
So I'm really looking forward to having this interview. Her name is Elizabeth,
with this woman who I'm going to talk to. Again, we haven't conducted the interview yet. We're
in the process of getting this, getting this setup and getting it underway. But I'm looking forward
to it. And I hope that you are too. I think you're going to love it because the importance of what
we're talking about here cannot be overstated. I don't think it can be. I don't think it can be
overstated. All right, there's there's much to get into. Okay, I did not mean. I did not intend to
to go on that that rabbit trail. I want to let me just wrap this up before we go to break. I'm
looking at the clock here. So the state was arguing in this case, the state of California was saying
that its policy is advance a compelling interest in student safety and privacy.
But the Supreme Court wrote that even though the state is arguing that their policies
advance a compelling interest in student safety and privacy, those policies cut out the
primary protector of children's best interest and that's their parents. The policy is cutting
the parents out at the knees and they understand what they're doing. They're doing it on purpose.
A federal judge had already struck down the California policy, December 22nd, 2025.
But the appellate court said, hey, you know what, we're going to let it come back in.
But now that the Supreme Court has ruled here, we're going to see where this goes.
And we're going to keep our eye on it. By the way, in this piece here, by the epoch times,
Troy Myers is reporting this and he did reach out to California Department of Education and,
of course, they did not respond. All right, my friends, more to come on the other side of this
break. I'm Doug Evans, author of this spout book. And I'm also a father with a three-year-old daughter
and that's why we grow sprouts. Did you know that you could take seeds, add water and get fresh
organic vegetables in three to five days without soil, sunshine or fertilizer for under a dollar
serving? That's the miracle of spouting and I want to share that with you. Go to the spouting
company.com slash out loud and use the code out loud for a special offer. Oral hygiene hasn't
changed in 50 years. Brush, floss, repeat. We're told to use fluoride, which doesn't really address
the acid creating bacteria. That is where the dentist recommended Sprite Dental Defense System
shines. Sprite products contain xylitol, a natural sugar, which helps get rid of those nasty,
smelly acid creating bacteria in our mouth. The best way to care for your teeth and gums is by
using Sprite. The Sprite Dental Defense System has a wide variety of products, toothpaste, mouthwash,
mints and chewing gums that are designed to work together to keep your teeth clean and mouth healthy
and smelling sweet all day long. To get your oral care back on track in an easy, effective and
very tasty way, switch to Sprite today. Ask your dentist about xylitol and the Sprite products.
Sprite can be found online and it all find natural product retailers. Prepare for the next
pandemic with the wellness company's contagion emergency kit designed by Dr. Peter McCullough.
Get life-saving medications like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, plus a free nebulizer and a
guidebook for safe use. Order now by going to TWC.gov forward slash out loud and use code out loud for
$65 off your first order plus free shipping. My friends, the daily VStack is not just another
supplement. I talk about it all the time. It's part of my immune boosting regimen. The VStacks
are revolutionary approach to immune support. It uses breakthrough cellular absorption technology.
None of this pill business where you have to wait for it to go through your digestive system.
The VStack gets to your cells prontoistically. Vitamin A, vitamin C, D3 zinc, I mean it's
getting there now. It is an immune boosting support system. It's part of my immune boosting
regimen. I use the daily VStack and it's called the daily VStack because you use it every day.
At least I do. If you'd like to give it a shot, you'd like to take my anecdotal advice.
Give the VStack a shot when you use coupon code out loud. You'll get 20% off of your first order.
This is only at America out loud.shop. So I implore you. I encourage you. Go to the shop now and
take advantage of the VStack. All right. I want to, there's one more piece I want to get into here
and the waning the waning minutes of today's program. And it's a piece by Troy Myers.
No, I'm sorry. It's a piece by Zachary Steber. Steber? Stiber? Sorry, Zachary. Hope I'm
getting it right here. My good man. It's called American teenagers are sleeping less. This is
according to recent research. And it's troubling. It's troubling because we need more sleep.
The brain needs sleep. The brain needs rest. The brain. In fact, I got another piece. I
want to get into it. It's in my stack. It's been in there for a couple of weeks. I just haven't
had time to get to it. I should rephrase it. I haven't taken the time to get to it. But it's about how
while you sleep, how the brain cleanses itself. I mean, the brain needs a bath on a nightly basis,
my friends. And that's why sleep is so important. So this study is troubling that American teenagers
are sleeping less. He starts up by saying more teenagers are sleeping short periods of time
each night, according to this new study published by the Journal of American Medical Association,
the JAMA. Among high school students in America, more reported sleeping five or a few hours. I
couldn't do it. Get five or a few hours a night. And this is increasing. This is happening more
and more and more. More students are reporting this. I can't function very well on less than seven
and a half. I'm just going to put that out here. Seven, you know, I can get away with seven,
but not for the period of days in a row. I mean, I'm less than seven if I'm hitting six,
I'm just in trouble. My brain needs to bathe for a long time.
So reach the researchers discovered this when they were analyzing data from the youth risk
behavior survey. All right, so here are the numbers. The percentage of people sleeping,
the percentage of people sleeping that little increased from 15.8% in 2007.
To 23% in 2023, according to the associate professor and psychiatric psychiatry,
holy smokes. What's wrong with me? Do you think I maybe need to take an ad? I mean, I might.
This is from the Yale School of Medicine. That was the reason that more students reported
in sufficient sleep. 76.8% in 2023 compared to 68.9% in 2007. So more people, almost three quarters
are reporting less sleep than here in 2023 than reported in 07. Researchers deemed any number
of hours of sleep under eight per night to be insufficient. I agree with that. I mean, at least
for me, it's insufficient for me. They crunched the numbers from 120,000 plus students.
The percentage of students reporting six or seven hours of sleep each night remained about
the same. While fewer students reported getting eight or more hours per sleep per night.
So the amount of students sleeping eight plus hours is decreasing. The amount of students
sleeping six to seven stayed the same. The amount of students sleeping under six hours is increasing.
This isn't good. These findings show a broad increase in insufficient sleep across all demographic
groups, driven largely by increasing reports of very short sleep, according to the authors.
Females were slightly more likely to experience insufficient sleep.
Seniors were much more likely to sleep less than freshmen. So the moral of the story is here,
the senior females are in trouble, apparently. Students marking down lower sleep times were more
likely to report symptoms of depression and or suicidal thoughts and spending hours during the
day and social media and video games. Aha! There it is. It's why they're sleeping less,
probably because well into the into the wee hours of the morning, they're on social media or
they're they're gaming. Limitations of the paper include the lack of some potential contributors
such as family conflicts, according to researchers. Re and co-authors, Re is the name here.
Tahoe Greg Re is the associate professor here at Yale. Re and his co-authors said the
trans highlight the need for population level responses such as starting school later. Okay.
All right. I'm going to pause right there. I can tell you right now we're not going to get very
far into this study. If you're you want to start school later, like, you know, so if school starts
at seven, you want to start at say eight or nine. Would you like that? Because the kids are
are going to stay up later if you start school later. You think they're not going to take advantage
and say, oh, we've got an extra two hours. I could stay up later. How about that not be that the
population response here, the population level response? How about we have a different population
level response? And how about it comes from the parents? How about that? How about I don't know,
I mean, this is a novel idea, but what if I don't know say the parents instituted a lights out policy?
What about that? Mr. Researcher, man at Yale University. Why don't we tell the kids, hey,
it's bedtime? Oh, no, that's not their solution. Their solutions. I mean, they're staying up to three
o'clock in the morning. We should start school later. Okay. Randy Bates and editorial fellow
with the JAMA and its deputy editor Dr. Tracy Liu said in a commentary that adjusting school
star times could help address the problem. So they're on board here. They also suggested
teams avoid screen time for two hours before going to bed. That's better. Let's do that. Let's
avoid screen time a couple hours before going to bed. And let's say, I don't know, lights out of
10 o'clock. What time do they get up? All right. Let's do the math. If school starts at seven,
now here, maybe we just maybe we just take our school, for example, our day starts at 8.15.
So if you roll out of bed, I don't know, at seven o'clock, is that enough time to get
showered and cleaned up for the day? You think, is that possible? So if that's the case, all right,
again, let's do the math. If you're going to bed at 11, 12, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, you get up at seven.
That's eight hours. Is 11 o'clock not a decent hour? Could we not just go to bed at 11?
Why do we have to start school later? How about we go to bed at 11? How about this be our
population level response? How about we go to bed at 11? And let's say at nine o'clock,
screens are done. Let's just shut them off. You know, could we do that? Maybe we could start
making the parents aware of this research. I guess that's why we're talking about it here. Because
if we become more aware of it, if everybody becomes aware of it, then maybe we don't have to start
school later. Maybe we could just help the kids out by giving them information that they need,
such as, hey, little Johnny, little Sally, screen time is not going to help you fall asleep at night.
That blue light, now it's a wreck in your brain, just wrecking it, destroying it,
shut her down at nine o'clock. Give your brain two hours of,
matter of fact, how about, how about this? How about nine o'clock? How about in the evening you
have as much social media time as you want? You know, talk to your friends, have a blast.
Nine o'clock, you shut it down. And then, um, and then maybe pick up a good book. Maybe a great book,
maybe one of the great books. That's, that is a fantastic idea. Dean, that idea is so brilliant.
I just, why didn't you say it earlier? I don't know, I don't know why I didn't say it earlier,
probably because I wasn't reading this study earlier. Ah, okay. I'm not going to get through this,
but I can tell you right now that it's a problem, but the answer is not starting school later.
The answer is actually helping the teens, actually giving them some, some advice and some input
that might better their lives. I don't know. It's just, it's just a thought. That's all just a thought.
All right. My friends, that's it. It's all the time we have for today. Thank you, as always, for joining me.
I am happy that you're a part of this program. Encourage your friends and family to get on the
Dean's list. Let's unite to renovate the age.
