Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
businessMay 13, 20269:15pending

Should NATO be pay-to-protect?

About this episode

NATO was formed after World War 2 as a collective security alliance that would prevent future world wars. But President Trump sees NATO more like a transaction between countries where allies have to pay up or be left undefended. On today’s episode: How NATO is actually funded, why this longstanding alliance is under strain, and how the U.S. could pay the cost for these frayed relationships.

Fact checking by Sierra Juarez.

Your Next Listen

Europe's NATO members take an economic hit

Connect with The Indicator
— Sign up for the Indicator’s brand new newsletter
— Find our socials, newsletter, YouTube and more!
— For sponsor-free episodes, subscribe to PlanetMoney+ 

See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.

NPR Privacy Policy

Get every episode summarized

Each time The Indicator from Planet Money publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Should NATO be pay-to-protect?

The Indicator from Planet Money

0:00
9:15

More episodes

More from The Indicator from Planet Money

View all episodes →