Silenced: The Truth They Died to Tell

At the UPS store, we understand the importance of a first impression.

That's why we're here to help you put your best foot forward and be unstoppable with our printing services,

with high quality paper stock options.

Banners, business cards, venues, and more,

we make sure your small business stands out and your message reaches the masses.

After all, we're the one-stop, print-that-pop store.

Most locations are independently owned, product services prices and hours of operation may vary.

See center for details.

The UPS store, be unstoppable.

Come into your local store today and get your print on.

Imagine you are walking home from work.

Yeah.

It is just a completely ordinary Tuesday.

Right, just a normal day.

Exactly.

The sun is just starting to dip below the horizon and it's casting those, you know,

those long, familiar shadows across the pavement of your quiet neighborhood.

Yeah.

You can hear the distant hum of traffic.

Maybe a neighbor's dog barking a few streets over.

You are mentally going through your grocery list.

For, I mean, thinking about what you were going to watch on television tonight.

Right.

Maybe you were just stepping out to buy supplies for your house or going for your usual

evening jog.

Your mind is entirely occupied by the mundane.

The routine.

Yes.

The incredibly safe rhythm of your daily life.

You turn the corner and you are just a block away from your front door.

You can literally see the warm glow of your porch light.

Okay.

And then, well, you never come back.

Oh, man.

It is, uh, it's the ultimate nightmare isn't it?

The sudden, violent disruption of the ordinary really is one second.

You exist in the world.

You are tethered to your routines, your family, your future.

You possess a physical weight, a legal identity, a voice, right?

You're a person.

Exactly.

And the next second, there is just a void, an empty space where a human being used to be.

The transition from a living, breathing person to an unsolved mystery happens in the absolute

blink of an eye.

Well, welcome to Thrilling Threads.

Today, we are opening a terrifying stack of source material to really examine the mechanics

of silence.

Yeah.

This is a heavy one.

It is.

We are taking a deep dive into an investigative transcript, detailing real people who vanished

or were, you know, permanently erased after exposing dark secrets.

The ultimate price of truth.

Right.

Okay.

Let's unpack this because we aren't just here to recount a list of true crime stories.

Are we?

No, not at all.

We are looking at the underlying architecture of suppression.

We want to understand how powerful entities, we mean powerful, extremely ranging from hyper

local street gangs to massive, heavily armed national governments.

We want to know how they actually go about the logistics of erasing whistleblowers.

Like what are the actual mechanisms of making a human being disappear when that human being

knows way too much?

Yeah, exactly.

But before we jump in, I do want to establish a firm parameter for you, the listener.

Good point.

Of course, texts we are analyzing today involve incredibly complex political landscapes,

deeply corrupt governments and powerful figures from various nations across entirely

different eras.

Right.

So, our job here is strictly to impartially report the findings from the text.

We are not taking political sides, nor are we endorsing any specific ideology left or

right.

We're just the passengers.

Precisely.

We're following the terrifying threads of these documented files to see exactly where

they lead.

So, let's start at the absolute apex of the power structure, the machine of the state

itself.

Right.

The very top.

We are looking at what happens when the entity designed, funded, and you know, legally

mandated to protect you is the exact same entity that decides that you need to be permanently

removed from the population.

Terrifying paradox.

It really is.

We are examining the mechanics of overt versus covert erasure.

And to understand the baseline of state-sponsored vanishing, we have to travel to Argentina in

the 1970s.

Okay.

We need to look at the life and the erasure of Elena Holberg.

Ah, yeah.

Elena Holberg is a vital starting point because, honestly, she completely shatters the

stereotype of the radical outsider.

Right.

She wasn't some underground rebel.

No, not at all.

She wasn't a dissident in operating in the shadows.

She was the establishment.

I mean, born in 1931, she was a trailblazer within the system.

She worked her way entirely up to the Argentine Foreign Service.

Exactly.

She became one of the very first women to graduate from the country's main diplomatic

school.

By the late 1970s, she had achieved a highly prestigious posting in France, working directly

at the embassy.

So she represents the ultimate insider, a dedicated civil servant who, you know, really

believed in the structural integrity of her government.

But the structural integrity of that government was, it was collapsing into a military dictatorship.

And the friction begins in 1978.

According to the source, she is suddenly recalled to Buenos Aires.

And the justification is incredibly vague, right?

Super vague.

Supposedly, it was due to, quote, issues, unquote, with naval intelligence officers she

had been dealing with.

Just try to imagine the psychological whiplash of that.

You are sitting in an embassy in France at the pinnacle of a diplomatic career he's

been decades building.

You have navigated these notoriously patriarchal corridors of power to get there.

And then a sudden cold directive from Buenos Aires just pulls you back.

Yeah.

You aren't being promoted.

You are being recalled because of friction with military intelligence.

The sheer institutional weight of that directive must have been suffocating.

So she is brought back to the capital, working inside the foreign ministry.

And then comes December 20th, 1978.

The day she vanishes.

Right.

And it's daytime.

Broad daylight.

She tells her colleagues she is leaving the building to meet a group of journalists.

Which is a totally normal professional errand for someone in her position.

Exactly.

But she never arrives.

She is grabbed directly off the street by a military task force.

And we really have to pause and analyze the logistics of this moment.

Because this isn't a mugging.

No.

The operation executed by the state.

At this time, the Argentine state apparatus had been completely weaponized against its

own citizens.

Yeah.

The military agent was operating secret detention centers.

And many of them were run by the Navy.

These were basically bureaucratic black sites designed specifically to hold, interrogate and

torture prisoners completely outside the bounds of any legal framework.

So Holberg is abducted by the very government she serves and taken to one of these facilities.

Exactly.

I'm trying to conceptualize what that realization must feel like for someone like her.

I mean, for decades, she operated within the rules of diplomacy, law, and state craft.

She knew how the system worked.

Right.

When a crime occurs, you call the police.

You report to the authorities, but what do you do when you are dragged into a basement?

And the people standing over you in uniform literally are the authorities.

It is a total inversion of reality.

There is nowhere to run.

The people answering the phones at the emergency dispatch are the ones who authorized your

kidnapping.

What is the ultimate manifestation of helplessness?

And you know, the timeline here is critical for understanding the state's methodology.

What do you mean?

Well, for weeks, there is absolute silence.

A high ranking diplomat simply ceases to exist.

Then on January 11, 1979, her body is pulled from a river just outside the city.

Right.

It had been in the water for a significant period.

Fingers immediately point at high ranking Navy officers.

It becomes glaringly obvious that she was killed after uncovering things she simply

wasn't supposed to see regarding naval intelligence operations.

But hold on.

I was reading this in thinking, if the military junta controls the entire country and

if they have these sprawling secret detention centers, why leave her body in a river to be

found?

It seems counterintuitive, right?

Yeah.

Why not just incinerate her or bury her in a mass grave where she vanishes forever?

Finding the body seems like a massive failure of the cover-up.

But you are viewing it through the lens of a criminal trying to avoid getting caught.

The state wasn't trying to avoid getting caught.

Leaving her body in the river was not a botched cover-up.

It was a highly calculated, bureaucratic communication strategy.

Wait, a communication strategy?

Absolutely.

A military task force has the logistical means to make a body disappear into thin air.

Allowing her to be found was a deliberate, chilling message.

It was a broadcast to every other diplomat, every civil servant, every journalist in the

country saying, essentially, this is what happens when you step out of line.

We did this.

We want you to know we did this and we want you to know you are completely powerless

to hold us accountable.

Jesus.

So the overt violence was a tool of mass psychological compliance.

Exactly.

The body itself becomes a piece of state propaganda.

That is deeply macabre.

Mute.

But it begs the question of evolution, right?

A 1970s military dictatorship relies on brute physical force and terror.

But the mechanisms of silence surely adapt to their environment.

They have to.

Yeah.

If we move from a dictatorship to a modern 21st century Western democracy, the tactics

have to change.

You can't just drag a high-ranking official off the street and the London without collapsing

the government.

Precisely.

The goal, which is a racer, remains the same.

But the methodology shifts from overt physical violence to covert institutional pressure.

Okay.

Break that down for me.

If a dictatorship uses a sledgehammer, a modern democracy uses a vacuum chamber.

Oh, that's a great way to put it.

The outcome is equally devastating.

But the mechanics rely on isolation rather than abduction.

And this brings us to the United Kingdom in the summer of 2003 and the highly disturbing

case of David Kelly.

Right.

Kelly was a top tier British government scientist.

We're talking about an absolute authority on biological weapons, a literal expert in

his field.

He had spent years as an inspector navigating some of the most dangerous weapons programs

around the globe.

And like Holberg, he is deeply embedded in the establishment.

He is an asset to the state.

But the context surrounding his erader is arguably one of the largest geopolitical earthquakes

of the modern era, the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Right.

The stakes are astronomical.

In the lead up to the war, a BBC report airs containing an explosive claim.

I remember this.

Yeah.

It alleges that the British government had actively exaggerated intelligence regarding

weapons of mass destruction to justify the invasion to the public.

It essentially accuses the state of manufacturing the Cassis Valley for a massive military conflict.

Exactly.

And the source for this claim was an off the record conversation between a BBC journalist

and David Kelly.

And the cardinal rule of journalism is protecting your source.

But that shield shatters his name leaks.

And once David Kelly is exposed as the source of this massive geopolitical scandal, the

institutional crushing begins at lightning speed.

It was incredibly fast.

On July 15, 2003, he is summoned to appear before a parliamentary committee.

And this isn't some quiet closed door meeting.

It is a highly aggressive, televised spectacle, a modern day witch hunt.

He is relentlessly grilled by politicians.

The government and the media are engaged in a historic bare-knuckle brawl.

And this scientist, you know, a man accustomed to laboratories and quiet inspections is thrust

right into the center of the Colosseum.

And then two days later, on July 17, he leaves his home in Oxfordshire.

Yeah.

He tells his wife he is going for a walk and he never returns.

The following day, his body is discovered in a wooded area near his home.

And the official cause of death is ruled a suicide.

That's the official line.

I just, I cannot accept that official narrative without extreme skepticism.

Based on the source material, let's look the sheer logistics of this timeline.

Let's do it.

We have a highly trained internationally seasoned weapons inspector.

He is suddenly outed globally, humiliated on live television by his own government, caught

in the crosshairs of a regime-defining scandal.

Right.

And within 48 hours of this televised crucifixion, he just happens to wander into the woods

and end his own life.

Highly suspicious is an understatement.

The timing alone is astronomically convenient for a government that was desperate to silence

the narrative he helps start.

It demands profound critical questioning.

There's no doubt about that.

But regardless of whether you believe it was a staged assassination or a state-induced

suicide, the mechanism of erasure is fundamentally the same, absolute suffocating isolation.

The state stripped away his anonymity, weaponized the media against him and isolated him from

his peers.

They just cut him off from everything.

They created an environment of such immense psychological pressure that his survival became

impossible.

If we synthesize Holberg and Kelly, we see the dual nature of state power.

The Argentine Junete used the physical infrastructure of a secret prison.

And the British government used the institutional infrastructure of a parliamentary inquiry.

Both methods successfully removed dangerous variable from the board.

The isolation is the weapon.

It really is.

It is terrifying because it requires no bullets.

But as we move into the second section of these files, we transition away from the secrets

of the state and step into something infinitely more pervasive.

The currency of corruption.

Exactly.

What happens when the truth you hold doesn't threaten a politician's career, but threatens

an illicit multi-billion dollar financial pipeline?

While historically there is no faster way to summon the Reaper than to disrupt the flow

of illegal capital.

Yeah, that seems to be a universal rule.

When you transition into the realm of global finance and organized crime, you are dealing

with adversaries who view human life not as a moral weight, but purely as a line item

on a ledger.

Just a cost.

Right.

If the cost of silencing you is statistically lower than the profits you threaten, they will

balance the books.

The case of Alexander Parapolikni is a masterclass in the economics of assassination.

So Alexander Parapolikni was a Russian businessman working in high-level finance.

And he found himself tangled in one of the most massive corruption scandals in modern

Russian history.

And he made a staggering decision.

He turned whistleblower.

He possessed documents, exposing a scheme where billions of dollars were being systematically

siphoned out of the Russian treasury, laundered through a labyrinth of fake shadow companies,

and deposited into highly secretive Swiss bank accounts.

The stakes he was playing with were not theoretical.

He knew exactly what the consequences of his actions were.

Because of what happened before him.

Exactly.

The text notes that this specific financial fraud had already directly led to the death

of Sergei Magnitsky, the lawyer who initially uncovered the scheme and died in a Russian

prison.

Parapolikni was fully aware that he was dealing with an adversary who had already killed

to protect this money.

Yet he continued to pass highly sensitive banking documents to Swiss authorities.

And to survive, he makes the logical move.

In 2009, he flees to the United Kingdom with his family.

He seeks sanctuary in a quiet, affluent suburb.

Assuming the geographical distance and the jurisdiction of the UK will protect him.

And for a while, it seems to work.

But then we hit November 10, 2012.

He is simply out for a jog in southern England, just a 44-year-old man getting some exercise.

And he suddenly collapses and dies on the street.

Initially the local authorities look at the scene, you know, no gunshot wounds, no signs

of a struggle.

Right.

Nothing obvious.

It was likely a sudden tragic cardiac event.

But what's fascinating here is the evolution of the hitman.

It becomes truly terrifying.

How so?

Well, it took years, an intense pressure, for the truth to claw its way to the surface.

Toxicology tests eventually revealed traces of a highly obscure, incredibly rare plant-based

chemical in his system.

Wait, a plant?

Specifically derived from a toxic plant found in Asia, while legally difficult to prove

as a definitive murder weapon in a court of law due to the sheer novelty of the compound,

the implication is undeniable.

But I mean, if they have the resources to engineer a virtually undetectable botanical

poison, why even risk deploying it in a foreign country?

What do you mean?

Why risk an international incident in the UK?

If this is a financial syndicate, why not just ruin him financially?

Hack as accounts, destroys reputation, bankrupt him.

Murder seems like an unnecessary high-risk escalation.

Ah, because financial ruin leaves a living, breathing witness who can still talk to a journalist

or a Swiss magistrate.

Oh, right.

Dead men don't testify.

But more importantly, the method of the murder serves a dual purpose.

By using an obscure botanical poison that mimics a heart attack, they achieve plausible

deniability.

They avoid the immediate manhunt that follows a shooting.

Exactly.

It is a highly coordinated cross-border operation that requires immense funding, deep biochemical

knowledge and an intelligence network capable of tracking a target's daily jogging route

in a foreign country.

It shows a highly coordinated, well-funded adversary.

It is a demonstration of absolute invisible reach.

You can flee the country, you can hide in a quiet English suburb, but the ledger will

eventually be balanced.

That invisible reach is suffocating.

It proves that borders are completely meaningless to a list of capital.

Completely meaningless.

And speaking of a list of capital, that brings us to the case of Ross Alderson.

These shifts are focused from the streets of England to the sprawling casino floors of

British Columbia, Canada.

Now Alderson's profile is entirely different from a Russian oligarch.

He was an Australian national who spent years working inside the British Columbia Lottery

Corporation.

He was an investigator, right?

Yes.

And his specific mandate was to detect and stop money laundering inside state-sanctioned

casinos.

So he wasn't a spy?

No, he was a corporate regulator.

For seven years, he climbed the ranks until he became the director of anti-money laundering

investigations.

So he is literally the guy hired to stop the crime.

But the files highlight this agonizing slow-motion psychological collapse.

It's tragic to read.

He is in this director position and he is repeatedly sounding the alarm about massive, systemic

money laundering operations flowing freely through the VIP rooms of these casinos.

We're talking people walking in with literal duffle bags of elicit cash.

Yeah.

The issue internally, screaming at management to do something, yeah, but the organization

ignores him.

They didn't want to hear it.

You know, I look at Alderson like a building's fire alarm.

The management keeps unplugging it because the alarm is bad for business or like a casinos

white blood cell.

Oh, I like that analogy.

He was designed to attack the infection of money laundering, but the casino eventually

realized they were massively profiting from the infection.

So the organization's immune system attacked him instead.

That is an incredibly astute analogy.

It captures the essence of structural apathy perfectly.

When you present the rot to the very people whose bonuses depend on that rot, you cease

to be an investigator.

You become a liability.

And the cognitive dissonance of that environment, I mean, knowing the truth, having the evidence,

but being institutionally caramelized, it takes a profound toll.

His colleagues reported that he was operating under a crushing amount of stress, exhibiting

severe mental health struggles as a direct result of this constant grinding friction.

And he finally resigns in late 2017, but resigning didn't erase what he knew.

No, it didn't because in late 2019, he approaches reporters.

He states publicly that a massive commission of inquiry is necessary to expose the casino

money laundering, and most dangerously, he volunteers to help.

He signals that he is ready to testify.

But when he is officially summoned to appear before that commission, well, he vanishes,

he never shows up.

All communication ceases.

He has been missing ever since.

And this introduces a different mechanism of silence, the utility of ambiguity.

Ambiguity?

Yes.

Unlike paraplegne where a body was left behind, Alderson's disappearance leaves a gaping void.

Did the sheer psychological weight break him?

Did he quietly flee back to Australia to save his own sanity, choosing self-imposed exile

over testifying?

Or did the multi-million dollar underground casino network intervene before he could take

the stand?

We don't know.

But from the perspective of the syndicate, why is it vanishing better than a body?

I mean, finding a body sends a message like we saw in Argentina.

Because a body initiates a homicide investigation.

A disappearance leaves the authorities in a jurisdictional purgatory.

Oh, because you can't prosecute a murder without a victim.

Exactly.

More importantly, the ambiguity itself is a form of terror.

For any other potential whistleblowers inside that casino, the not-knowing is agonizing.

That makes sense.

If Alderson was murdered, they know the stakes.

If he simply ran away, they know that even the director of investigations couldn't handle

the pressure.

Either way, the message is clear.

Do not speak.

It is a brilliant terrifying tactic.

And the permanence of a vanishing brings us to one of the oldest cases in this section,

Mauro de Mauro.

Ah, what?

We are jumping back to September of 1970 to Palermo, Sicily.

Tomorrow was a veteran investigative journalist.

He was deeply entrenched in the dangerous world of exposing the mafia and corrupt political

figures in Italy.

When you look at tomorrow's career, you realize he wasn't a rookie stumbling into danger.

He had spent a decade meticulously painting targets on his own back.

In the fall of 1970, tomorrow was aggressively researching a highly sensitive story regarding

a powerful Italian energy boss who had recently died in a plane crash.

A very suspicious plane crash.

Right.

The public was told it was a tragic aviation accident, but tomorrow possessed evidence pointing

toward a massive orchestrated assassination and a subsequent cover up involving the highest

levels of the criminal underworld in the state.

He was actively chasing down the final leads.

And on the evening of September 16, 1970, he leaves his office to walk home.

This is the exact scenario we discussed at the beginning of the show.

A man walking through his own neighborhood.

Yep.

He never makes it inside his front door.

He is physically grabbed off the street.

The subsequent police response is massive.

I mean, thousands of officers scouring Sicily, but he is never found.

For over 50 years, his disappearance has remained one of Italy's most enduring mysteries.

Crazy.

And if you look at the trajectory of Parapilicney, Alderson, and Damaro, the unifying thread

is the cold mathematical brutality of illicit capital.

They all tied back to money.

They operated in different decades on different continents, dealing with different industries,

you know, Russian banking, Canadian casinos, Italian energy.

But they all followed the money.

And the harsh reality is that when you follow the money long enough, you eventually cross paths

with people who consider human life much cheaper than their profit margins.

Erasing a journalist or an investigator is simply the cost of doing business.

It's just an operational expense to them.

That is chilling.

It truly is.

We have covered the staggering power of the state apparatus and the borderless reach of

global financial syndicates.

But as we move into section three of these files, the geography of danger shrinks.

It gets claustrophobic.

Exactly.

Because sometimes the most lethal secrets aren't hidden in a Swiss-Bang account or a classified

government dossier, sometimes the threat is standing right behind you in the checkout

line at the grocery store.

We are talking about hyper-local retaliation.

We shift now to journalists exposing local corruption.

This is a crucial pivot in our understanding of suppression.

Global conspiracies operate with sophisticated poisons and international hitmen.

But local corruption is deeply intimate.

Intimate is the perfect word for it.

When an independent journalist starts digging into the petty graft of a town mayor, the

local police chief or a neighborhood gang, the retaliation is an outsourced to a professional.

No.

Handled by the very people the journalist sees every single day, the threat radius is zero.

Let's examine the case of Francis Nyari to see how this intimacy weaponizes itself.

It is 2009 in Western Kenya.

Nyari is a freelance journalist who makes his living uncovering local scams.

Right.

In the weeks leading up to his murder, he publishes a series of deeply antagonistic articles

about massive financial fraud involving a housing project.

The twist in irony is that this housing project was meant for the local police officers.

The psychological pressure and the lead up to his vanishing is profound.

He isn't being threatened by anonymous emails from a foreign country.

He is receiving direct physical threats from the people in his own town.

His friends noted that he became entirely consumed by paranoia, terrified to even walk

down the street alone.

Try to conceptualize that level of isolation.

If the people issuing the death threats, where the police uniforms of your town, the entire

concept of safety evaporates.

You cannot call the authorities when the authorities are the ones holding the knife.

Exactly.

On January 15, 2009, Nyari leaves his house to buy construction materials, but totally

mundane errand.

He never returns.

Two weeks later, his body is found dumped in the Codera forest.

There was a brutal scene.

His hands are bound and his head has been separated from his body.

With the visceral betrayal of this case lies in the logistics of his abduction, which came

out later during a confession from a taxi driver.

Right.

The driver admitted to picking up Nyari, but the vehicle wasn't empty.

No.

Sitting inside the taxi were two local police officers and several members of a local street

gang.

They drove him into the forest together.

I have to stop on that detail because the mechanics of that taxi ride are staggering.

It wasn't just a gang hit.

It was a joint venture.

A terrifying partnership.

You have the police officers, the agents of the state, sworn to protect the public, literally

sitting shoulder-to-shoulder with street-level gang members, utilizing public transport infrastructure

to execute a journalist.

It is a complete synthesis of state authority and criminal violence.

It makes me so outraged the very police officer sitting in the taxi taking him to his

death.

And despite the confession, despite arrests and a trial, no convictions ever occurred.

But look at the function of that trial.

What do you mean?

Why even bother holding a trial if they already control the system?

Because a sham trial provides a veneer of bureaucratic legitimacy.

It allows the corrupt apparatus to say, look, we followed the law, we held a trial, and

there simply wasn't enough evidence.

It sanitizes the murder.

And we see this exact same mechanism of daily impunity in the case of Sandeep Kothari

in Madhya Pradesh, India in 2015.

Yeah.

The journalist in Madhya Pradesh exposing a massive illegal iron or mining operation.

And he crossed the ultimate red line.

He named names.

He published the specific names of the businessmen and local officials profiting from the theft

of natural resources.

The threats poured in, but he refused to stop.

On June 26, 2015, he is out running errands in a busy part of town.

The file is explicitly note it was a populated area.

Broad daylight.

A group of men physically grab him, force him into a car in front of witnesses and drive

away.

Two days later, his body is found dead near a creek.

And the legal aftermath is a complete black hole.

The source notes the case has dragged on for 11 years, with three arrests and zero convictions.

11 years.

But if we connect this to the bigger picture, the 11 year legal limbo is not a failure

of the Indian justice system.

The limbo is the justice system functioning exactly as the corrupt officials designed

it to.

It's intentional.

Hyper local corruption operates with such terrifying brazenness because they don't

need sophisticated poisons.

They commit crimes in broad daylight because they already control the local courts and police

who would investigate them.

The delay is the weapon.

It's a feature, not a bug.

They want the public to watch them get away with it, right?

Which leads us to the most visceral case in these files.

Evany Jose Metzger.

In Brazil.

Right.

We are in a small town in Brazil in early 2015.

Metzger runs an independent blog and he has moved into this specific region to aggressively

investigate crime, local politics, illicit substances and the exploitation of minors.

He is poking a hornet's nest.

And the hornets react immediately.

He goes missing around May 13, 2015.

Five days later, an anonymous tip leads police to a remote area where his body is discovered.

The scene was horrifically violent.

It was a gruesome lead up and his body was found completely missing its head.

Right.

We could tough question here because I am seeing a glaring psychological divergence.

OK, let's hear it.

When we looked at the state erasure of David Kelly, it was a clean suicide in the woods.

When we looked at the financial erasure of parapelikni, it was an undetectable poison simulating

a heart attack.

But when we look at these hyperlocal cases like Yari in Kenya or Metzger in Brazil, we are

seeing beheadings and brutalization.

Why the shift?

That's a very perceptive question.

If the goal is just to silence a blogger, a bullet to the back of the head, it cheesed

that.

Why is local retaliation so incredibly graphic?

Because you are confusing the primary objective.

For a state intelligence agency or a Swiss banking syndicate, the primary goal is the removal

of the threat with zero blowback.

They want the public to think it was a tragedy, a medical event, or a suicide.

Exactly.

But for a local cartel or a corrupt municipal government, the primary goal is not just

the removal of the journalist, the primary goal is the subjugation of the entire town.

They operate on a different currency, which is performative graphic violence.

So the grotesque violence acts as a sort of psychological tax on the community.

Precisely.

It is a tax on community trust.

When cartels and corrupt local officials violently mutilate a blogger and leave his headless

body to be found, it's not just about stopping him.

It's a billboard to the rest of the town saying, this is what happens if you speak.

Wow.

It forces the citizens to realize that the state cannot protect them and therefore they

must submit to the authority of the cartel.

The trauma is the padlock they place on the town's mouth.

That is a staggering sociological concept, performative violence as a mechanism of municipal

governance.

It is grim, but effective.

Well, we have traversed an incredible landscape of suppression.

We have looked at military genitals, billionaire oligarchs, and hyper-local cartels.

A lot of ground covered.

The sheer scale and variety of this violence might make you the listener feel like this

is a uniquely modern plague.

You might be listening to this in thinking, well, this is just the inevitable result of global

banking, the internet age, and modern political corruption.

But the final section of our files demands that we pause.

Yes.

It asks us to strip away every piece of modern technology.

No encrypted messaging, no offshore wire transfers, no internet.

We are rewinding the clock exactly 200 years.

This historical anchor is perhaps the most illuminating segment of our entire analysis.

We are traveling back to the 1820s to upstate New York.

The case of William Morgan.

Right.

William Morgan was the definition of an ordinary guy.

He wasn't a diplomat or a high-level financier.

He was a stone cutter, a bricklayer, a guy who occasionally ran a small store.

He was entirely unremarkable until 1826 when he made a fatal miscalculation.

He publicly announced that he was going to publish a book, revealing the highly guarded

inner secrets of the Freemasons.

We really must contextualize the Freemasons in 1820s America.

They were not a benign social club organizing charity tenors.

They were an immensely powerful, highly secretive fraternity.

Their members occupied the most prominent positions in society.

They were the local judges, the sheriffs, the mayors, and the wealthy merchants.

And Morgan claimed to be initiated into the order, right?

He did.

But when they rejected him, he felt deeply slighted.

That rejection became his catalyst.

He teamed up with a local newspaper publisher, utilizing a rudimentary printing press, and

set out to expose the men who secretly ran the town.

You can imagine the absolute panic among the local elite.

An ordinary bricklayer is about to print a book that strips away their misdeeds.

They are furious.

They resolve to stop the publication at all costs.

But here's where it gets really interesting.

It's September 1826.

No internet.

No global offshore bank accounts.

Just a guy, a printing press, and a powerful society.

And look at how they handle it.

They don't just put on masks and grab him out of his bed in the middle of the night.

Instead, they weaponize the local legal system against him.

They have him officially legally arrested on entirely bogus minor charges, specifically

failing to repay a tiny debt of roughly $2.

Wait.

$2?

Yeah, yeah.

I mean, in 1826 that was something, but still highly questionable and practically irrelevant.

The debt was simply the legal pretext.

Wow.

By having him officially arrested and thrown into a local jail cell, they physically detained

the problem.

They utilize the legal system to stop the book under the impenetrable guys of legal authority.

But the jail cell was merely a holding pen.

Because shortly after he is released or rather extracted from that jail, he is immediately

taken away by a group of men forced into a carriage and never seen again.

His body is never recovered.

The files note that his vanishing sparked a massive wave of public outrage.

But the core mystery was never solved.

The mason's involved largely protected each other.

And I marvel at how the William Morgan case is the key stone of our entire discussion.

It brutally strips away the illusion that the suppression of truth is a modern technological

phenomenon.

The mechanics haven't changed in centuries.

Exactly.

The weaponization of the legal system to detain a problem, the bogus debt charge, followed

by a permanent, extrajudicial disappearance.

Is the exact same playbook used by the Canyon Police in 2009 or the Argentine Junta in 1978?

It proves that the urge for power to fiercely protect itself in the shadows to violently

eliminate whatever threatens its survival is a timeless, fundamental human instinct.

The tools change from a horse-drawn carriage to a botanical poison, but the dark geometry

of power remains exactly the same.

The dark geometry of power, that phrasing perfectly encapsulates everything we have explored

to death.

I've done quite a journey.

As we step back and review the massive journey we have taken you on.

We started with a 1970s Argentine diplomat dragged into a naval black site.

We examined the psychological demolition of a British weapons expert, the silent poisoning

of a Russian financier, and the agonizing ambiguity of a Canadian casino investigator.

And we witnessed local journalists in Kenya, India, and Brazil paying the ultimate graphic

price.

And we anchored it all to an 1820s stone cutter in New York.

The absolute through line connecting every single one of these disparate lies is clear.

Truth is the most dangerous substance on earth.

It absolutely is.

And this brings me back to a core philosophy that we continually emphasize here.

Critical thinking is essential.

We only know about these massive cover-ups.

We only know about the billions siphoned out of Russia or the illegal iron ore operations

in India because these specific individuals possessed an almost incomprehensible level

of courage.

They brought the receipts.

They looked directly at the terrifying machinery of power.

And they decided that the truth was worth more than their own physical safety.

And that leads me to a final provocative thought I want to leave you with today, a concept

that lingers heavily over all of this.

Okay, what is it?

Think about the sheer scale of the effort used to silence these people.

These powerful entities went to unimaginable brutal lengths to erase these individuals.

But didn't they ultimately fail?

That is a fascinating paradox.

How do you mean?

Yes.

Their physical bodies were tragically removed.

The assassins succeed in stopping their breathing.

But the fact that you and I are sitting here today reading their names and their discoveries

out loud on thrilling threads.

It means their truths became immortal.

I see.

We're trying so desperately to silence them.

The powers to be actually amplified their voices forever.

The act of suppression cemented their legacy.

The machinery of silence ultimately manufactured their immortality.

Exactly.

You know, address this to you, our listener.

Which of these cases makes you question the official narrative the most?

It's a lot to process.

And honestly, deeply ask yourself, if you were in their shoes holding a piece of dangerous

truth that could change the world but cost you your life, would you publish it or would

you bury it to protect yourself?

It requires profound self-reflection.

We want to know your stand.

Leave a comment down below and let's keep the conversation going.

Thank you so much for joining us on this deep dive into the source material.

It is an honor to guide you through these historical shadows.

Absolutely.

Thank you for giving us your time.

Keep questioning the narrative and remember, the next time you are walking home in the

quiet of the evening, think of the people who walk that same path, carrying the weight

of the truth.

We will see you next time on Thrilling Threads.

Take care everyone.