SpaceX Files for What Could Be the Biggest IPO Ever

Nearly home.

Isn't home where we all want to be?

Reba here for Realtor.com, the Pro's number one most trusted app.

A dream home and a dream home if it comes with a nightmare commute.

That's why Realtor.com has Realtor.com so you can search by drive time.

Download the Realtor.com app today because you're nearly home.

Make it real with Realtor.com.

Pro's number one most trusted app based on August 2025 proprietary survey.

The Supreme Court hears arguments on birthright citizenship.

The outcome could re-determine who gets to be an American.

You have people who have been relying on this automatic birthright citizenship

for over a century and so I think that there's always concern about

how whatever they decide will play out in the real world.

Plus, SpaceX files for what could be the biggest IPO in history.

And NASA is planning to go where no one has gone before,

or at least not since 1972.

It's Wednesday, April 1st.

I'm Alex O'Solev for the Wall Street Journal.

This is the PM edition of What's News, the top headlines and business stories

that move the world today.

The Supreme Court heard arguments today on possible limits

to birthright citizenship in the US.

As expected, President Trump sat in on part of the hearing.

The first known example of a sitting president to attend arguments

before the Supreme Court.

On the first day of his second term,

Trump signed an executive order that would end automatic birthright citizenship

for babies born to unauthorized immigrants or people living here temporarily.

At least six courts have already said the order violates the 14th Amendment.

WSJ Legal Affairs reporter Lydia Wheeler joins me now from Washington.

Lydia, what was the Trump administration's argument here?

So the Trump administration is arguing that the citizenship clause

of the 14th Amendment was adopted to confer citizenship

on newly freed slaves and their children,

not on the children of immigrants in the country temporarily or illegally.

And so what they're really focused on is that the citizenship clause

says all persons born or naturalized in the United States.

And this is the key words subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens.

And the government argues that it's those words

in the jurisdiction thereof that creates this condition

that requires a child's parents to be citizens of the United States

or permanent residents both under the Constitution and federal law.

How did the justices seem to respond to those arguments?

So the justices across the court's ideological divide

the skepticism of the government's position

that the citizenship clause was never designed to include

the citizenship of people in the United States temporarily or illegally.

And even Justice Samuel Alito at one point was like,

isn't this a humanitarian problem?

You know, he said that normally when you think about someone

who is subject to an arrest potentially because they're here illegally

that they wouldn't say that they are domiciled

or have a permanent residence in the US.

But because of our ineffective immigration laws,

he said people have come to think of themselves as being permanent residents.

There are people who are subject to removal at any time

if they are apprehended and they go through the proper procedures.

But they have in their minds made a permanent home here

and have established roots and that raises a humanitarian problem.

So it seemed like right from the start that the government was having a hard time.

But then there was this notable shift kind of halfway through the arguments

where it really started to seem like maybe some of the court's conservative majority

was actually in favor of the president's arguments here.

I think that there's always concern about how whatever they decide

will play out in the real world.

So you walk through the Trump administration's arguments

and what is the other side arguing?

Right, so civil rights attorneys representing the individuals in this class action

are challenging the order and they say that the Trump administration

is trying to radically reinterpret what has been a pervasive understanding

of the Constitution as well as the court's own precedent and federal law

for well over a century.

And they said that it's trying to erroneously add this domicile requirement

for US-born children with foreign national parents.

Okay, guess we'll have to wait and see.

That was WSJ Legal Affairs reporter Lydia Wheeler.

Thanks, Lydia.

Thanks so much for having me.

A decision is expected by the end of June.

In his first comments after the arguments,

President Trump posted on social media that the US was, quote,

stupid for allowing birthright citizenship.

Anthropic is scrambling to contain the fallout

after it accidentally exposed the underlying instructions.

It uses to direct its popular AI agent app, Claude code.

As of this morning, anthropic representatives had requested the removal

of more than 8,000 copies and adaptations of its raw Claude code

instructions, known as source code,

that developers had shared on programming platform GitHub.

WSJ Tech reporter Sam Shekner joins me now.

Sam and anthropic spokesman said the leak didn't expose

any consumer information or data.

So just what was leaked here?

What it is is it's the harness.

If you imagine an AI system is like a horse,

you need a harness to ride it, to direct it.

You know, Claude code is a tool that experience developers can use

to really accelerate their work.

It does a large amount of coding on its own.

And Claude code has been a driver of growth for anthropic.

It's something that has one anthropic,

a lot of business from developers.

So if suddenly they're kind of giving away the recipe,

even accidentally, for how they put that together,

that's some big deal.

And how did this happen?

Well, what anthropic says is that there was a packaging issue

caused by human error when they were publishing a new version

of Claude code in lay person speak.

That means that there was a file that was a roadmap

for all of the internal source code for Claude code,

rather than the sort of compressed version

that you would actually run on your machine.

So the company is now scrambling to contain this fallout.

What is that stake for its business here?

Anthropic is potentially looking at an IPO later this year.

It recently closed and ran around a funding

that values the company at $380 billion.

And Claude code is certainly a large part of that equation.

And this is a blow to anthropic in part

because the company's brand has been that it's the AI company

that's concerned about safety

and that takes security very seriously.

Even a simple mistake can undermine that image

in the eyes of the enterprises that are buying its services.

But it also reveals the trade secret

of how they make Claude code work.

Anthropics competitors now have a detailed roadmap

for how to clone some of these features

without needing to reverse engineer them.

In addition, there could be security issues.

Once you know the source code of an app,

it might make it easier for hackers or others

to better manipulate the AI model into doing stuff

that it's not supposed to do like help with cyber attacks

or actually compromise the app itself

which could put users of the app in danger.

That was WSJ Tech reporter Sam Schechner.

Thanks Sam.

Thanks so much for having me.

Now for the latest on the war in Iran.

An opposed on his truth social network today,

President Trump said the US would consider a ceasefire

quote, when Hormuz straight is open, free and clear.

Trump plans to address the nation on the war this evening

at 9 p.m. Eastern time will be live streaming his comments

on WSJ.com.

Meanwhile, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

said the state of Hormuz remains firmly under its control

and dismissed Trump's quote, performative actions.

Earlier, President Trump said he's considering

withdrawing the US from NATO.

That's according to an interview with a British newspaper

in which he sharply criticized the military alliance's response

to the war.

His comments come amid a deepening rift with European allies

after they declined to join military efforts

to reopen the state of Hormuz.

Coming up, around the moon and back

is where NASA astronauts are headed as soon as tonight.

That and more after the break.

What does leadership really look like?

On the power of advice, a new podcast series

from Capital Group, you'll hear from athletes,

entrepreneurs and executives who've led on the field

in the boardroom and in their communities.

It's not about titles, it's about impact.

Discover what drives them and the advice

they carry forward.

Subscribe and start listening today,

published by Capital Climb Group Inc.

The US would wrap up military actions in Iran soon.

Comments from the Oval Office suggesting

a resolution could come within weeks,

pushed all three major indexes higher.

Nasdaq led the way with the 1.2 percent gain.

The news wasn't as positive for the energy sector,

which has been boosted by the surge in oil prices.

Today, Brent Crude, the International Oil Benchmark,

slipped 2.7 percent to about $101 a barrel

and shares an Exxon mobile fell 5.2 percent

shedding around $36 billion in market value.

Exxon hasn't lost that much value in a single day

since the global financial crisis in 2008.

Egg prices aren't freefall, which is good news.

Unless, of course, you sell eggs.

This morning, Calmaine, the biggest egg producer

in the US reported a 53 percent drop in sales

for the quarter ended February 28th.

Still, that decline wasn't as bad as Wall Street expected.

Shares closed more than 5 percent higher.

General Motors reported a nearly 10 percent drop in sales

in the first quarter of the year.

High interest rates in higher car prices

kept potential buyers on the sidelines.

It's a sharper reversal from this time last year

when sales surged 17 percent as drivers rushed

to beat incoming tariffs.

Analysts have been expecting car sales

to be flat or down for the year.

And payroll processor ADP reports the US economy

added 62,000 private sector jobs in March,

beating economist expectations.

Most of the hiring was concentrated in education

and health services.

We'll get the government's official jobs report on Friday.

SpaceX is planning to go public

in what could be the biggest IPO of all time.

Elon Musk's rocket company has confidentially filed IPO

paperwork with regulators.

And we reported it's aiming to raise

between 40 and 80 billion dollars.

Corey Dribusch covers IPOs for the journal

and she says the company is on track

to potentially list it shares by the summer.

One reason for that?

We have a couple other huge IPOs

that are eyeing debuts later this year.

And those are AI rivals,

which are open AI and anthropic.

The lot of the same investors

are going to be looking at putting money into SpaceX

as open AI and as anthropic.

And if one of those doesn't go well

and they happen to go first,

those same fund managers might say,

you know what, I'm gonna put in a smaller order this time.

I don't think I'm gonna buy as much of that risky stock.

Once it's public, SpaceX's filing is expected

to shed light on the company's operations,

which range from satellite factories to launch paths.

And finally,

if all goes according to plan later this evening,

NASA will launch its boldest moon mission in decades.

The roughly 10 day mission called Artemis 2

will send four astronauts around the moon

as close as 5,000 miles to the satellite and back.

It would mark the deepest human space flight

since the last Apollo lunar landing in 1972.

The crew on board, the capsule Orion

may become the first people to see parts

of the far side of the moon.

The astronauts will test all kinds of ship systems

like life support, communications and navigation

ahead of even more ambitious plans for Orion.

WSJ Space Reporter Micah Maidenberg

says the stakes are high for NASA.

This is a big deal.

This is a high stakes mission

for the agency for the contractors.

And most of all for the crew

that's going to be on board Orion,

neither the rocket or Orion

have ever carried humans on board.

So it's a big moment and a lot of first.

This is the effort where the agency is hoping

to one day send astronauts back to the surface of the moon

and then press on to sort of bigger goals

with exploration human landings on the moon in 2028.

A moon base Mars someday,

but it all kind of starts with Artemis too.

After entering back through Earth's atmosphere,

Orion is designed to splash down under parachutes

in the Pacific Ocean, not far from San Diego.

And that's what's news for this Wednesday afternoon.

Today's show is produced by Amani Mawiz and Alexis Green

with supervising producer PRBNMA.

I'm Alex O'Sola for The Wall Street Journal.

We'll be back with a new show tomorrow morning.

Thanks for listening.