Special Edition: OpeanAI CEO Sam Altman Talks GPT-6 Astra Debut, Going Public

0:00For Begrim, one of Thailand's oldest established companies, growth does not begin with a deal. It begins with trust. Later in this podcast, hear how that approach has taken the company from Thailand to South Korea and the United States. Bloomberg Audio Studios Podcasts, Radio, News Live on Bloomberg Television and on Bloomberg Radio with OpenAI, CEO Sam Altman, and Sam, the way that OpenAI is framing Astra is basically an early step toward AGI, but I thought we could start a conversation just with basically what's fundamentally different with Astra relative to prior generations of model. It feels, first of all, thank you for having me. It feels like a new step in this process towards models that can really help us create value, do work, discover new science, help us create, help start new companies or creating products. Using it subjectively feels to me very different than any model before.

1:03What's the kind of principle use case that's different this time around? You know, I think we can get into the generations of model that were very coding focused. I know a lot of the development was very cyber security focused, but taking it away from the software engineer, what is the everyday person unlock in AI that they weren't able to do previously? One thing that I think people will immediately notice is if you have an idea and you want to work interactively with an AI to get a complex piece of a whole piece of software built, this is the first model to me where I could tell someone, just give it a try. There's a good chance it'll work. I've watched people make computer games, I've watched people do home DIY electrical engineering projects, I've watched people do very complex simulations for some piece of science they're working on, certainly a lot of the work where you would normally sit down, have to build a financial model here and then a PowerPoint presentation around it

2:04and then figure out how to make a little interactive piece of code to try different simulations. That stuff is all so doable now. What I hope will happen is people, I think people will be surprised at the beginning, but then as they build up more trust in the model than more like wow, it can really do this. Just start throwing harder and harder tasks and more creative ideas at it and they will find out what the model can really do for them. So the specifics of how Astra is being released, I think it's important, so a version of it with specific guard rails, what was the thinking behind that and what are those specific guard rails in this early release of it? So the challenge of our industry is that we have these models that are getting incredibly capable and incredibly useful and that people want to use to everything from make their lives a little easier to starting new companies. And then on the other hand, as these models get more capable,

3:04the risks that we have to mitigate also become more serious. The models could do more damage if we don't do a good job at that. And so we have spent, obviously this model took us a little longer to release than we were hoping. I think it'll be worth the wait, but we really wanted to spend the time on the safety and security alignment of this model. Yes. And I think as people understand the power and impact and capabilities, they will be happy that we did. We will have different tiers of cyber access for this model for cyber in particular. Today we're rolling it out to trusted access partners, and then in the coming days, assuming everything goes well, we'll roll it out more broadly. You couldn't say, well, if this model has a cyber problem, why let anyone use it for cyber, and I think it's very important to note that the world is very close to a complete change in the landscape of cyber attacks. And the only way that we see for society to collectively defend itself

4:05against this coming wave of models from around the world and from other companies is to use tools like Astra to rapidly defend against these new kind of cyber threats. So we will have multiple programs for people at different levels of verification and trust, but we do think it's quite important that the world use these models to collectively defend ourselves. What happened prior to release is important, right? You determined that Astra can find and develop zero-day exploits without any human intervention, essentially. And so you paused some of the work to strengthen the safeguards. What specifically was it that you saw that made you hit pause, the behavior, I suppose, of the model? So it's worth pointing out that the model that we're launching today is GPT-6 Astra has been done training for a while. The model that we recently talked about pausing is a future model. But with Astra, we did hit cybercritical

5:06and that required under our preparedness framework a new set of safeguards just to be able to release Astra because of those cyber capabilities you talked about. I got a lot of questions for you Sam about Astra and Chain of Thought. I don't know if that comes as a surprise to you or not, but as Astra becomes more autonomous or future generations of the model become more autonomous, can OpenAI sort of say with confidence that you see and understand what the model is planning before it acts? In other words, you have visibility into the reasoning that basically users of the model can't see. OpenAI can, for obvious reasons. Could you go into that a little bit? Yeah. So we have talked for a long time about the importance of monitorability of models. We've also said that we believe in defense and depth and this is only one part of it. There is sandboxing, maybe most importantly, there is alignment. There are a number of things that come together to be able to make the safety guarantees that we want to be able to make with a model.

6:06But monitorability is an important thing and we've been talking, I think, for well over a year now, about the importance of chain of thought monitoring and how we have made various decisions there that help us preserve chain of thought monitorability, even if it means we don't maximize the capabilities we could otherwise get. And we think that is important. It's an important component. We also want to be clear we don't think that's the only component that matters. We're live on Bloomberg Television and on Bloomberg Radio and we're speaking to Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI. There's a lot of bad PR in the world around AI at the moment, everyday citizens worrying about the impact. One way I wanted to put that to you is whether you can say unequivocally that if Astra or any future generation were all behaved in a way that was dangerous that you would be able to detect it and then shut it down. The obvious hard part of that question is that people have different opinions about what model should be able to do and shouldn't be able to do.

7:08We think there are some things that very clearly model should not be able to do. There are some clear red lines and we talk a lot about being able to detect those but people also have strong opinions about things within the broad bounds of what is possible about how they use AI and how they want to be able to use AI. And this is going to be a difficult question for society because there is not going to be agreement on what is an isn't acceptable use of AI. I think it's very important in the same way that people do things with electricity that I may not always like but I think everybody has a right to electricity that we say there are going to be some rules for society. You can't go like electrocute somebody else on the street but this is an important platform that belongs to all of us and that we need to be able to use. So there will be an ongoing conversation, negotiation in society. There will of course be some things that we agree on that people just should not do with AI. But there's a lot of edges that we're now going to have to feel our way through and giving people autonomy and freedom

8:11to use AI is important to our mission. Sam at the G20 this week, Treasury Secretary Scott Besson said that the AI industry had done a terrible job of explaining how AI benefits ordinary Americans. What's your view of that and whether you would on reflection consider open AI to be in that bucket? I think the industry has done a terrible job of this on the whole. I think we have done a bad job ourselves you know maybe better than some others worse than some others. It is difficult of course to explain that this is the world should in my opinion should want us to worry a lot about this technology. The world should want us to think about all the ways that could go wrong to talk about what we see coming but not to sort of like stir up doom or concentrate power for ourselves just because in the history of technology the way you solve the hard problems is to look at them, talk clearly about them, have scientists debate them,

9:11work really hard to prevent and mitigate them and that has been our intention but clearly sometimes it ends up scaring people. Now there's another thing that I think is going really bad besides talking about the ways this could go wrong which is I don't think we've done a great job as an industry of really talking about how to empower people with this technology. You know you hear some people talk about well we're going to give you a cure for cancer and that's so great so we're going to take these risks and you're going to have to have less power and autonomy. We want people to have more power and autonomy. You know I don't think a cure for cancer is enough. I mean wonderful thing to have obviously but we should set our sights higher. We want these tools to enable a boom in creativity and entrepreneurship and people figuring out new ways to be useful to each other and wonderful products and services to enable each other with and I think that has been lost in the messaging and I also think there's some companies that have a different opinion there but it's very very important to us that this technology is

10:15something when people get more power and more autonomy not less and I think people rightly get afraid when they feel like AI leaders might not quite want that for them. Sam that's in part why I wanted to ask you about pricing on on Astra but also just generally right I think the direction of travel has been that you've cut prices there is competition of course with the other frontier labs and the topic but you know how much is that the balance of access to the technology you need to move quickly in releasing the technology and also still trying to sort of find fair market value of how you price the technology. We want to create incredibly capable and incredibly low cost and incredibly abundant intelligence and I think Astra is a great step forward there. The token efficiency of Astra is so impressive to me. The amount of work you can get done with a relatively small amount of tokens and the kind of the price per dollar of a task that you might like I think is just remarkable. Only a few weeks ago we cut the price of Luna

11:16our small model by 80% and our goal is to have the best price performance at every level of intelligence all the way along the curve. We will continue to keep dropping prices dramatically. I'm confident in the shape of the technology and the work we're doing to enable that to happen and you know of course like we'll make some money along the way but I think the opportunity in front of us is so huge we will be able to continue to bring prices down and still have huge revenue. Let's end our conversation here Sam with Astra is a big step towards AI actually doing work autonomously right. I've come to sort of see the emphasis on that. If you staying ahead in the race that you've just outlined requires open AI to just keep investing more heavily maybe then expected to keep pushing out the boundaries of what the models people were doing the cadence of release. Where do you sit right now on your considerations of doing that as a private company

12:19versus doing that as a public company? Where the sort of financial incentive and fiduciary duty of being a public company isn't necessarily the same as being committed to developing the technology getting the technology released out into the world. If we do go public someday which I assume we will I plan to spend a lot of time reminding people who might want to buy or might not want to buy our stock that we are mission first and that we're also extremely long term oriented. So we are going to make decisions for what we think is best for society as a whole with this technology and we're going to make decisions on a multi-decade time frame and we think we'll do really great as a company but we're going to put those things first. Open AI, CEO, Sam Outman with us live on Bloomberg Television. Thank you very much indeed. A new market, a new partner, a new project. Growth can sound simple but for one of Thailand's most enduring companies BeGrim, expansion starts long before any deal is signed. It starts with relationships, it starts with trust.

13:22We follow our vision. That's why we went to America. We enter into US market for the small hydro protect 30 MkW in Malaysia. There are many many companies that are very successful in their own metrics and so I think everybody has to define their own way of success. I would find success by being a good part of society. People look at us say, yeah, this company does well for society that I would define as success. Find out more by searching BeGrim, Students of Compassion, wherever you get your podcasts. Here are five reasons to subscribe to Bloomberg News now. Number 5, you get the latest news from around the world instantly. Number 4, it saves you time. Your day's busy, catching up takes just a few minutes. Three, it's available 24 hours a day whenever you need it. Two, it's convenient. Listen on your smartphone or smart speaker. And number 1, it's easy to find. Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or anywhere you listen.

14:22Five reasons? One simple way to stay on top of the news. Bloomberg News Now.