Loading...
Loading...

Politics without the soap opera with unfiltered constitutional conservative truth.
The conservative review with Daniel Boehm.
And welcome back fellow American patriots and Minutemen standing at the ready to fight
a new for the issues that matter on this Friday, first day of spring as things grow because
God ordained it as such.
One thing that's not growing is our economy and the brains of the Republican Party and
the fake conservative movement.
We're going to try to do that here today at CR podcast, your host, Daniel Hurwitz.
We've been talking a lot about economic stuff, fiscal stuff.
I haven't talked a lot about the war in Iran, but I want to talk about it through the prism
of the economy.
And the fact that, you know, we want to be tough on Iran, but the problem we have is that
when you suck on every other issue, including the economy, it creates two problems.
It creates a logistical problem and it creates a political problem.
So the logistical problem is you need a wartime economy to support a war.
We have a sucky fragile stagflation economy with record prices, very low employment, no
real manufacturing and output.
So when you go through a war, you're subject to shocks in the system that are natural.
If the war is going well, I'll be going to have problems particularly with the Straits
of Hormuz with oil.
And I've said before I support clearing the shipping lanes permanently and getting rid
of the menace that spikes the price of oil, even if that's going to cost, you know, a
month worth of temporary spikes.
But the problem is what if you have an economy that can't handle it?
Because we're so weak and this is the problem with Trump squandering, frankly, his first
term, causing all the COVID debt and then coming back and doing nothing but sophistry.
So yeah, I mean, we're not in a position to wage war.
He's asking for $200 billion for it.
We don't have the money and it's going to bankrupt us, it's going to create more inflation.
So this is sort of the problem there.
And whoever controls logistics wins war.
It's not about tactics as much as it's about logistics.
And when you don't have an economy behind it, it's very difficult.
So I want to get into that with Tracy Schuchart, our financial doctor, as I like to call
her.
So we'll do a little bit of a round robin in the second half of the show about the state
of our economy, the state of oil prices, gold, silver, what's going on with all that,
treasuries, statflation, cat-backs, you name it.
But there's also the political aspect too that when you're so unpopular on your demeanor
on the economy, on everything else, so then it's going to make things that even should
be popular unpopular.
And I think a good example of this is immigration.
And I want to get to the last 24 hours, Trump has announced a number of things.
Number one, it's been revealed by the Wall Street Journal that he wants to move away from
mass deportation.
Number two, he came out with this AI regulatory framework that preamps the states, but
then has window dressing to attempt to deal with some of our concerns, but it doesn't.
And then he's demanding a farm bill, okay?
And you know, all the while, he's also demanding Pfizer reauthorization.
So I want to juxtapose all those issues together to show that it's the exact wrong focus,
making an economy, a culture, a society that's too ultra processed.
That's too fake, too much reliant on asset bubbles and the stock market and fake cat-backs
and the surveillance state.
And let's do more of it.
That's the solution, rather than focusing on farming and ranching.
Oh, actually, no, I support a farm bill.
Yeah, except the farm bill is nothing but the Obamacare equivalent to healthcare.
This is that to agriculture where it just distorts the market and supports corporate farms
and supports favored crops that ought not to be subsidized.
So let's start out with immigration.
Wall Street Journal reports that Trump told his inner circle some mass deportation policies
went too far.
The desire for an immigration reset is being driven in part by Trump's White House chief
of staff.
Susie Wiles, no surprise there, who believes the president's immigration team has turned
one of his marquee issues into more of a challenging issue ahead of the midterms.
As a result, the admin is attempting to change not only how it talks about the issue, but
also what actual enforcement looks like.
And they note that basically they surrendered after Minneapolis, which we saw, and that
arrests have ticked down from 1,200 a day or from 1,500 a day to 1,200 a day.
By the way, that's only 438,000 a year.
So that would wind up being less than 2 million at the end of this term.
And that's just a rest.
So removals are exponentially lower because we refuse to update the INA and end judicial
supremacism.
So it's actually much lower than that.
Mark Wayne Mullin said, my goal in six months is that we're not in the lead story every
day.
Wait a minute.
No, actually you want that to be the lead story.
What do you want the economy?
So this is what the administration does.
So Trump grabs a hold of our issue immigration, messages it like an idiot, doesn't look sincere,
then is horrible on the economy, which taints every other issue.
That's just the reality.
So it makes everything else unpopular.
Then as the nerve to say, you know what, yeah, messed deportations unpopular.
So now we're not going to do that anymore.
Dude, you're losing because of the economy.
It's not because of of best deportation, it's not the issue.
It's because of the economy.
And that you squandered your first year with stupid tariffs, stupid ballrooms and a compilation
of random demand side tax provisions in a weird bill, your one bill that you had to pass
something that no one can even articulate or run on, that's the problem.
And then your entire moonshot economically is now is now AI and generative AI and cat
Dex and and more insinification, more surveillance state, rather than producing things of substance.
But I just want to show you guys what we could have had.
When DeSantis was asked about the same thing, a bunch of Florida sheriffs said, yeah,
we shouldn't have messed deportation.
We should focus on the criminals.
Here's the difference between a person that has a heart, soul and brain and a sincerity
of purpose.
You tell me what would bleed through to the voters more.
Take a listen here to bear when they had limited resource.
They have more resources now because they got an influx of.
I stand with following Florida's policies, which has said, you can't have a situation
where Biden can bring in 10 million people.
And then we're not allowed to remove them back to their home country.
This idea that unless you're an ax murderer, you should be able to stay, that is not consistent
with our laws.
And it's also not good policy.
We have different people that are victimized by illegal aliens every day in this country.
Not all of them have criminal records at the time.
In fact, probably most of them don't.
But under some view, it's like, okay, yeah, you come illegally, and then you stay until
you commit a really violent crime.
That just doesn't work.
It's incoherent.
It's not.
And it's not what the president ran on.
And so to send a letter to him, asking him to go back on his campaign policies, I would
not advise that to be done.
So folks, that is what it means to have a serious statesman.
But of course, we couldn't have that because we had to crush a generation of thinkers all
to serve this one man that now supports the opposite of everything he said.
We're in his second term.
I want to want you guys to remember, it's not just about the last 14 months.
He has failed to enact a single immigration bill in his entire time.
We're left with nothing.
And this is where we are, but it didn't have to be that way.
Just know that's an indictment in all these people.
So then the next thing is, oh, AI, AI.
So they came out with their AI federal framework, okay?
Now I warned you guys that David Sacks was working on a rope adope.
The problem is what they're doing with the data centers and the slop.
It is so indefensible that they have to embrace it.
So it's a political tactic.
What you do is you tell your opponents, you're right, you're right.
So they put out a four-page document and you and I would not disagree with a thing
in that document.
It's a talking point.
It's boilerplate.
Oh, we're going to protect children.
We're going to make sure there's no intellectual property stolen.
We're going to make sure it's going to be great and then it's only going to help people.
And then at the end, it has a provision.
Oh, and states are preempted.
Now it says, but they're only preempted things on things that should be federal, not things
that should be local in nature.
So make sure to say all of our talking points.
Oh, they'll pay for their own electricity, which is completely impossible for that to
happen.
And what it's designed to do is create a rope adope where you defuse the opposition and
you give just enough window dressing to our concerns as a pretext that now you can
come in with the main course.
Okay, now we're going to prevent the states from doing the real things that are needed
to be done.
And it's sort of like when you have kids that all they care about is eating dessert and
they don't want to eat dinner.
So it's always, yeah, eat a half a potato here, a tiny piece of chicken there.
But they're really not planning on eating much because it's all about getting the dessert.
It's the same thing here.
And I got to say, I don't even believe in any of this stuff.
Like you might think, oh, I want to regulate it.
I mean, as we talked about yesterday, and I'm sorry, yesterday's show came out late.
At least the audio version, but I talked about yesterday, yeah, there are certain things.
You can't allow it to have porn, you know, dangerous things, deep fakes, obviously stealing
copyright issues, you know, things like that, privacy issues, surveillance, what they do
with the data.
This all needs to be dealt with.
But my main issue is not even the safety side of it.
It's the efficacy side of it.
I disagree with the entire premise, the entire premise of this is, look, the future is
data centers.
We need to put our lives on the cloud and literally create a surveillance state.
And somehow that's going to create superintelligence and cure cancer and everything's going to happen.
Oh, there's just a couple of problems, like, Trinity, safety, miners, okay, we'll deal
with that.
No, the entire premise that we need a whole of government approach for generative AI built
upon the most expensive, painful, harmful and least beneficial component of AI that we
need a whole of government approach to gas like that.
No, I disagree with that.
Oh, we need to make sure we deregulate, okay, well, why don't we deregulate for building
the power we need?
Like, for example, we need more oil refineries in this country.
Why don't we have a national agenda on that?
We need more farms and ranches.
Why don't we have a national agenda on that?
Why is it always just to service this?
I'm okay with getting rid of onerous regulations across the board.
But why is it only this that this is the key to economic growth?
It's not.
It's the low latency narrow AI that they're steering investments away from it.
And even if you bought into this a few years ago, any president with a brain would look
at where we are now, a trillion dollars into CapEx, even Goldman Sachs and the Federal Reserve
have admitted that it has not produced anything.
So this is not what we should be sinking our teeth into.
But to the extent that you're actually going to support the talking points in the bill,
Marsha Blackburn has a bill doing that.
But for example, Marsha Blackburn's bill repeals section 230 immunity that we all said
three minutes ago.
We all supported a big tech, you know, censorship.
That's not in the framework, by the way, of the White House.
So the White House is a press release, okay?
You can't disagree with the word it says.
But Blackburn's bill, and I can't say I support everything in it yet.
I haven't read all of it.
But it at least puts pen to paper and codifies their talking points.
So if you don't see the White House supporting that bill, then it's a fraud.
And by the way, that bill does not have the final thing, which is state preemption.
And again, this ties into the other priority, like we talked about yesterday.
Fies the reauthorization section 02 without any reforms.
Notice everything is about the surveillance state, the cloud.
This notion that we need to put our entire lives on the cloud.
Every living organism in the world needs to be surveilled and aggregated with data.
No, we need narrow robotics.
That's what we need.
This has the most harm.
And then you need it's an unsustainable model that for all of time, you're going to have
to constantly be building computing power that sucks up all this stuff just so we can
spy on people and produce fake Iran war, you know, images.
It doesn't make any sense.
Like everything is going to service the cloud.
America leads the world in medicine development.
It matters.
We get new medicines first nearly three years faster.
Five million Americans go to work because we make medicines here at home and not relying
on other countries keeps us safe.
But China is racing to overtake us.
Will we let them or will we choose to stay ahead when America leads America cures?
Let's tell Washington to keep us in the lead.
Learn how at America cures dot com paid for by pharma.
By the way, we talked about this with 5G.
Why do we need a 5G tower?
They want to make a 5G on every block, just like a flock hammer.
We already have it into law that if the telecoms companies can show that there is a gap in
coverage, then they could come in there and preempt the locals.
So they can't block it.
Okay.
So why do they need it if there's no coverage gap?
The answer is there's no coverage gap, but they need it for the data centers, okay?
Because if you're going to put everything on cloud and have smart cities and run everything
on the cloud, so then yeah, you need an in an ordinance amount of this stuff, even within
a few blocks, a very heavy concentration of it, and it's inconceivable that something
like that is is particularly safe.
But this is what it's all about.
Notice everything the administration wants to do is preempt locals from keeping the quality
of life of their community.
And then on section 8 housing, that's part of the housing bill.
Now it doesn't mandate preemption, but it gives guidance and incentives, which will
essentially lead to that.
Flock cameras everywhere, 5G everywhere, and preempting localities from dealing with
data centers everywhere.
Carbon capture.
They wanted to preempt localities from dealing with that to what the hell?
This is like the worst manifestation of agenda 2030, then even the Democrats proposed.
And suddenly we're all for it, just like we're from 5 to 702, because met a Tom.
And then he has the nerve to come out with like a one line tweet on his truth, the truth
social, Congress passed the farm bill.
The farm bill is not about food and farms.
It's literally consolidating this corporate monopoly behind two or three row crops, giving
a bunch of subsidies to wealthy landowners that don't even farm, you know, with none
of the bigger forms in it, just pass a farm bill, more subsidies, harm them with the tariffs
and then throw more money at it.
The entire economic vision sucks.
It takes everything wrong with our economy, too much reliance on the stock market, too much
of a fake productivity, ultra-process productivity, too much of a surveillance state.
And just not just turbo-charge it, but make it that that is the entirety of the economic
message.
Oh, and then now I want to prosecute a word I ran.
Well, you can't do that with a garbage economy.
But anyway, I want to bring in Tracy.
Our sponsor today is our friends at Alliance Defending Freedom.
ADF is a Christian legal ministry dedicated to advancing the cause of free speech, marriage,
religious freedom, sanctity of life, parental rights, and they're fighting in court on all
these fronts.
They were involved, and obviously the DOBS opinion and they certainly were involved.
I don't know if you saw the Laurie Smith case.
Using the graphic designer on her religious freedom, they're fighting some of our culture's
most pressing issues.
They're also fighting the abortion drug that unfortunately DOJ is on the other side of
Mifapristone.
So ADF relies solely on generous donations from you.
It's not for profit.
So again, we have one more week until March 31st, where every dollar you give will be matched.
25 becomes 50, 50 becomes 100 bucks.
So go to join ADF dot com slash blaze or text B L A Z E to eight three eight four eight
to have your gift to ADF matched by generous donors today at join ADF dot com forward slash
blaze or text blaze to eight three eight four eight.
So folks, as I've been saying throughout the lead up to this war, it's an old adage.
To win wars with logistics, not necessarily tactics.
Logistics are more important and to win logistics, you need a robust economy.
And you know, there's a lot of things I think we need to do foreign policy wise.
I'm not an isolationist and I think we need to be tough.
But in our own interest, not referring Islamic civil wars and stupid things like that.
So yeah, I mean, I am very much in favor of getting rid of the Iranian threat in the
streets of Hormuz as I said before, I don't even have a problem with temporary spikes in
pricing and oil to do the surgery, just like when you do surgery, you have a temporary
period of pain.
But that's provided that you don't have a stagflationary economy that is so fragile.
It can't really absorb this.
And when you have a PPI like we had this week, we're built on top of such a high plateau
of pricing, joblessness is at a control for young people.
So and then now they're asking for 200 billion bucks and it's like, something doesn't make
any sense.
I mean, we have a trillion dollar military.
We should be able to degrade their capabilities without spending, you know, 50 million
a pop to blow up a $100,000 facility.
And so, you know, a lot of us are sort of caught in this where we know Iran's a problem.
We know Hamas Hezbollah a problem.
We wanted to turn it.
Now, as I mentioned before, it's also hard to support because Trump himself is inconsistent
on foreign policy as well on that front.
He should have just let Israel do it for free last year rather than stopping them.
And then now going 200 billion dollars worth ourselves.
But how do we deal with this when we have an economy that is completely in the toilet?
It's worse than it's ever been.
We're not producing anything.
Manufacturing's been in the toilet.
All they want to produce is data centers that are good for nothing, but surveillance
date number one and chat slop number two.
It's funny.
Trump is complaining about the propaganda, these AI videos for my rent.
It's like, yeah, well, that's what data centers are for.
That's what they're good for producing, not low latency, narrow AI that could be used
for, you know, robots and weapons and things like that.
You can't suck on the economy and be a good wartime president.
So now we have obviously oil prices spiking.
We have, again, somewhat inconsistent that they want to take off sanctions on Iran, which
sort of defeats the purpose, then why go to war with them.
We also have gold and silver getting hammered at a time that you would expect them to be
doing very well is that a short term trend is that a long term trend.
So I figured we'd do a check up and bring back our favorite doctor of the economy, Tracy
Schukard, senior economist for Ninja trader live.
She also has an amazing sub stack, very high quality, renegade resources, check it out.
And of course, Chigurl, CHIG or L without the extra I on Twitter, and she's with us
in person.
Happy Friday and welcome to the blaze.
Happy Friday.
And thank you very much, Daniel.
It's been quite a week.
It's been quite a week.
Okay.
So you are the energy expert and the commodities grew.
Give us a tour of what is the state of play with oil.
I don't like reacting to every spike and drop in oil and gold in the stock market.
But give us the deeper, longer term view of what is going on with oil in general before
the war and what the oil has, and what the war has now done to its trajectory.
Well, we, before we were kind of at very depressed prices, right?
And we had all of the oil producers basically come out on their earnings call.
If you listen to their earnings call, really starting, you know, Q3, Q4 and Q1.
And all basically saying oil prices are too depressed.
We have no capex plants whatsoever.
And so that's kind of where we were depressed oil prices, no capex.
So, you know, it's looking like the Permian is starting to decline.
Wells are getting gasier.
And so production is kind of production is maintaining, but, but that's because they
include NGLs, which are natural gas liquids in that.
So which is becoming a larger and larger portion.
So our, we have a decline in pure oil and low prices and no capex, that's how we started
this war.
Now, we are in this war and obviously we have the straight of the whore moves that closed.
That is 20% of all global oil trade flows through there, not to mention everything else,
but just for global oil and product trade.
It's 20% of the global trade.
That's a huge amount.
Now we're, and of course, then we saw oil prices spike and they've been kind of volatile
and very headlight reactionary at this juncture.
Obviously, the big news when it dropped, we've spiked overnight on Sunday night when we
opened after, you know, the weekend of the first.
And then, of course, we spiked again once we bombed Iranian South Park field, gas field.
And now we're still in kind of this volatile realm right now, and probably will be for
a while.
The thing is, is that I know the president is talking to oil producers and he wants them
to produce more, but there are, you know, first of all, you can't just turn on it well.
It just doesn't work like that.
It takes, for even for shell wells, if you already have a drilled but uncompleted well,
duck well, even if you have that in your backlog, it still takes six to nine months to bring
up to par.
Also, this is a geopolitical oil price spike.
And we know what happens after that.
We have oil prices come right back down.
We saw that last June when the first 12-day Iranian war happened and oil prices spiked
high, came back, came back down until oil producers are, there are time horizons 5, 10,
15 years.
They're not going to go out and spend a bunch of money and oil prices drop back to $50.
They're just not going to do that.
And so we're kind of in this predicament, at least in the United States and elsewhere,
where oil producers really can't do that much.
And the other problem is, is now we have such a backlog of ships that we're running out
of tankers right now, because they're all just sitting idle.
And the other tankers, we have prices spiking, obviously, for that.
And we're running out.
So even if you could produce more, there's nowhere to put it.
You can't send it out.
There's like a war for tankers right now.
And so the longer this lasts, unfortunately, is going to become a larger and larger problem.
So Tracy, let me ask you this, don't all roads lead to refineries, that if you look at
our inefficiencies, on the one hand, our production is this sweet light crude.
But then our refineries are not capable of refining that and have to refine the darker crude.
So then we have to import it and rely on that.
So Republicans stand up for the last generation, Drill Baby Drill, oh, Drill More Oil, but isn't
the real log jam in our ability to be independent and have enough oil that is ready for our economy
and all of our economic needs, shouldn't that infrastructure, like if you want to talk
about CapEx, I know the White House, but I'll say the number one emergent issue is to make
sure we have more data centers for AI, that's going to do everything.
But shouldn't actually the Manhattan project sort of mindset be towards either more refineries
and also the type of capacity that could deal with the oil we have?
Yeah, well, we, honestly, we need both because diesel runs the economy and you can't get diesel
out of a barrel of WTI, it's just not possible.
So we do need heavy crude.
Luckily, we have neighbor north that we buy a lot of heavy crude for.
So we need both types of refineries.
But what we have been, the problem is in the United States is that our last refineries
is built in 1977, okay?
And we've had declining refining capacity because we've had refineries shut down.
We have two in California, shutting down now because of the hostile business environment
in California.
That's a whole another story.
But you know, that's two more refineries that are going down that's Philip 66 and a
Valero refineries.
So we have shrinking refining capacity and we, the President Trump just announced that
that we are going to build a new refineriant Texas with reliance who is an Indian company.
It will, it will refine WTI.
So that's great news.
But you know, if that doesn't happen overnight, you know, it's going to take a few years
to get that built.
So I mean, we should have really thought about refining capacity, you know, 20 years
ago, maybe.
No, but it's not the Republican party and I got to say Trump, their big focus has been
on just drilling in the abstract, but then also ethanol and biofuels.
So doesn't that also sort of degrade the refineries and defer our capacity to junk?
Well, yeah, and you know, unfortunately, and you know, we have a lot of ethanol plants,
obviously, but you know, that industry is heavily subsidized, obviously.
And you know, farmers are paid for, you know, it's basically we didn't know what to do
with all of our corn, really how that all started and why they started putting it into your
fuel.
Oh, you mean because we have these five year farm bills where we make where the most
subsidized thing is corn, because I don't know why we just decided to do that.
Unnaturally, tip the balance to corn, distort farmland in terms of what we grow.
And then we're like, oh, okay, let's use it for fuel.
And then refineries now have to buy a rinse credits.
Yes, to a total.
Like, so this is my problem.
We're not focused on the right things.
And if you're going to go to war, you have to be prepared, we should have, you know, I mean,
we should have had this and also pipelines, obviously.
This episode is brought to by Colaguard.
Do you know what's really scary?
Not screening for colon cancer when you turn 45.
The Colaguard test is non-invasive, requires no special prep or time off work and shifts
right to your door in just three simple steps.
Colaguard takes the scare out of colon cancer screening.
If you're 45 or older and at average risk, ask your health care provider about the
Colaguard test.
Colaguard is available by prescription only.
Learn more or request a prescription today at colaguard.com slash screen.
Obviously, we need a ton of pipelines and we still need a ton of pipelines because if you
want to power these data centers, we need gas pipelines.
And so, you know, I still expect, and I've been talking about this for two years now because
of the AI thing, you know, I think, you know, pipelines are good investment right now have been
because now you're talking about some of these data centers are going to tap directly into
gas pipelines instead of having to go through utility companies.
So we need a lot of pipelines also.
So the other thing also is so, so there's the oil Achilles heel here and then there's the
also the debt Achilles heel.
So the debt is almost like, I mean, I hate to say it, but it's made our economy sort of like an
end of life patient where you're in a vicious cycle where things go wrong and you have to go
in and do surgery, but you can't because the body couldn't sustain it and so weak.
We're now at a point where the the stag and the flation are so bad that it can't absorb
anything. So I'm strong international defense and you have to be careful with when you deploy
the military, but we need to be able to do it when we need to do it. But the problem is because
we're Medicaid nation, okay, that's what we are. So we're we're just endless entitlements
and welfare. It's 2.8 trillion more in debt servicing over the last 14 months since inauguration day.
The PPP came in so hot despite the economy being flat, which is which is astounding.
So when they come and ask for 200 billion more for the war, what is that going to do to the
economy? Well, I'm sure that well, I know that a lot of people aren't exactly thrilled about that.
I mean, we are we are hooked on debt. I mean, that is it. We can't get rid of it. You don't have
anybody. Neither side of the aisle is going to give up any kind of, you know, fiscal spending,
whatsoever entitlements. So, you know, another 200 billion, you know, it almost doesn't even
sound like that much at this point because we're talking trillions, which is crazy to think about.
But, you know, it's another 200 billion that's not in the budget. It's not. It's got to come from
somewhere. Where is it going to come from? You know, we're going to issue more debt for that. What
are how are we going to handle that? Were you able to see did you see the PPI numbers?
Yes, it came in there. They came in hot, very hot.
So, my question to you is how much of that do you believe is the baseline
core inflation from the debt and the money supply and how much of that is the tariffs beginning to
show its head? Right. And that's interesting. You pointed out because Powell in his pressur this week,
he sort of he was very focused on inflation over the labor market this time. If you remember
back in December, he was more concerned about the labor market. He was all about inflation when
he was speaking this week and he said, you know, I think we're still going to see a pair of tariffs
pass through in this market even though we haven't been able to see it. So, I do think maybe we are
starting to see that companies have absorbed as much as they possibly can and now they have to
pass that off to the consumer. For those who don't understand the inflation, if you could just
explain and plain English, how and why is it that you could have such a high price level in this
country given the economy is pure hell that we're really not producing much. People are in debt,
there's joblessness and so typically if the money ain't there, the money ain't there, you can't
charge it. The prices go up when you have a wealthier, more productive, humming pop economy.
How is it that you could have an economy like this with prices so high?
Well, I think there's two things. We have a K-shaped economy, right? So, the top portion of that
K that can afford everything where the bottom portion is really struggling. As you mentioned,
if you start looking at default rates, right? We have automobile default rates,
our credit card default rates, our mortgage default rates are up. So, the bottom
half of the economy is really, really struggling. The top half of the economy is, or the top 20 percent,
maybe less than that, and now is carrying the economy essentially.
So, look, I know you work in this industry, and I'm not against the stock market, it is what it is,
but to your point, US household wealth just hit a new record, 2.2 trillion,
but I'm sorry, it rose by 2.2 trillion to 184 trillion in quarter four, buttrist by stock portfolios.
So, I mean, do we now have a problem that our entire economy is built on a perception of a
perception, of evaluation of companies and industries that's completely divorced from what they
are actually producing and generating, and is that responsible for this K-shape?
Yes, well, yes, and yes, part of that, and we're also a debt nation. I mean, everybody charges
everything, generally in economics, when prices rise, people can't afford things, then you have
deflation because nobody's outspending, but we aren't seeing that because of the well factor of
the very few, and because we're a debt-ordination, I mean, even consumers are, right? Everybody's
living off of their credit cards, and so we have an issue with that, and then as far as valuations
are concerned, well, absolutely, you only need to look at the AI sector to look at that. I mean,
granted, they have pulled back this year, valuations have gone down a lot, but, you know, there
were ridiculous multiples, right? And all these companies are doing now is taking on debt to build
out these data centers. They're not even, you know, they're teetering it on, you know, profitability.
They used to have cash cushions, and now they're not. They're all issuing corporate bonds.
And I think the markets, you know, before this happened, I think at the beginning of the year,
we saw some investor concerns over kind of these high valuations and the fact that these so far
companies are borrowing more than they are doing anything else, and we have, we don't know if they
you build all these data centers, how profitable is this going to be? We don't know.
I mean, Goldman and Powell both seem to indicate it didn't really contribute anything other than
unproductive debt. It did not contribute anything. Right. It's not producing anything. I don't
understand how this is sustainable. So how come Wall Street and venture capital hasn't
barked at it? Like how do they still get capital? Um, it's amazing, right? Because I think it's
the craze right now. It's the phase every and everywhere you hear is we got to get their first.
We got to get their first. We got to get their first against China gets, you know,
I mean, to all Europe's far behind on everything. But still, you know, it's a race to we've got to
beat China to this. We've got to beat everybody else to this. And so that mindset is permeated
Wall Street. And that's all they care about. But even after watching the last few years,
like I could understand a few years ago, right when it came on the market, the first chat
slot, but look kind of cool. Okay. And now it's like, wait a minute, you really mean to tell me
that if we put every living organism 24 or seven and everything it does on the cloud and spin
up a turn up a magic eight ball oracle, um, it will spit out a cure cancer. It will spit out the
best doctor, the best lawyer that this this this generative AGI. I don't understand how they
could still believe in that when China has like 120th of the amount of data centers that we have.
And instead they're focusing more on freight train synergy, like, like low latency stuff that
you could program on a laptop. Right. It doesn't require all this. But it's actually narrow AI.
Like they're not, I mean, I don't know if you agree with me, but my thesis is you know why they're
not competing because the only thing this stuff is good for is the surveillance state and they
built it long ago before data centers. Also good point that is very true. It's just like this whole
thing is driving me nuts. So as as a long-term a commiss investor, I want to I want to get to the
crux of what's really bothering me in my heart. And I know a lot of people because everyone listening
here we're all we we long believe in free market capitalism. We believe that nothing's perfect,
but it's the best system that creates an equilibrium between job seeker and employer producer and
consumer that everyone is greedy producers are greedy companies are greedy, but consumers are
greedy too. So you reach a price point that that works for people. And what I'm watching now is an
economy where clearly the balance has been tipped away from the worker and the consumer to a
point where you have no leverage. So Southwest could treat you like garbage now like take its loyal
base and trash it and get away with it. No one tries to take pride in productivity.
Am I correct in assuming that it gets back to what you said with with AI CapEx
that the incentive structure to reward CEOs is all based on
juicing up the stock market price and not actually producing anything. It is that why consumers
and job seekers are at such a disadvantage. Well absolutely because everybody's focused on
the stock market and you know President Trump is very focused on the stock market too.
And Bondy even was talking about the stock market and so that is you know seems to be everybody
focused on this is how well we're doing as a country because our stock market is up and then
look at everything in the economy like you know underneath the sheets so to speak it's not
looking that pretty right even if we you know are at almost all time highs in the stock market
and and realize that those are only a handful of companies as well right they were not talking
about being broad based like the Russell 2000 we're talking about the S&P 500 in the NASDAQ
and just a handful of companies in in those index markets as well I mean you're looking at you know
six stocks maybe count 30% waiting 35% waiting in the S&P 500 that's crazy.
Well never forget you know which company Nvidia took over that it replaced in the index
right was it Ed Moran? Ed Moran. Yes but like Jensen's the only one who actually
has made a profit on that he actually has gotten wealthy from this Jensen has done very well
from this whole thing but the economy at large it's it's garbage and like one of the things that
awesome curious about your thoughts as an investor you know do we really have a free market when you
have the force of government so federal state and local pensions all funneled through the stock
market but then like you said what's the stock market it's dominated by you know a handful of
companies mainly in the tech sector so doesn't that again give them an unnatural flow of capital
that they didn't really have to earn through providing a great product at a nice price point.
Well of course and you know and we are now the government is now taking stock income in companies
which is even more bizarre right so now you have a government picking and choosing which companies
they want to survive. Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile I don't know if you knew this but
anyone can get the same premium wireless for $15 a month plan that I've been enjoying it's not
just for celebrities so do like I did and have one of your assistance assistance switch you to
Mint Mobile today I'm told it's super easy to do at Mint Mobile dot com slash switch upfront payment
of $45 for three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required intro rate first three months only
then full price plan options available taxes and fees extra default terms at Mint Mobile dot com
yeah but don't forget that the executive branch is exempt from the stock act on insider trader
it's only congress that is the problem not the people at treasury and commerce that literally
know an hour before they're about to create a partnership and I mean like this is what I just
don't understand I mean three minutes ago in 2024 I know that's a long time for people but
I'm only in my 40s so I don't have you know I don't have dementia yet and we all decry this K-shaped
is everything unnaturally as towards what I call an ultra processed economy that it's not free
market it's some of the things that Bernie Sanders also observes but we would argue his government
interventions caused a lot of this so you know that leaves us to looking for other things and we
were all into gold as a hedge against this so I want to maybe close with this if you can take your
expertise in commodities because I'm very perturbed that it seemed like gold was doing very well
as the stock market was doing very well and then now with Iran you see the treasuries going up
you see the oil crisis you see the general maelays around a war this normally would be like
the equivalent of a mosquito breeding ground for the price of gold yet gold is taking a
bigger hit than the stock market and the silver as well could you address both of them why it appears
to be the inverse of its typical pattern yeah well I mean conventional wisdom says we're you know wars
are supposed to be bullish for precious metals right and but the Iran conflict is kind of doing
something the textbooks don't cover and it's pricing in inflation and pricing out rate cuts
simultaneously and the rate channel side of gold is winning in all this because it is tied to
real yield so that portion of gold is currently winning also you have some uncertainty in the stock
market right now and so what are you going to sell first what's been working right particularly
if you're getting caught maybe upside down or margin called on some of your other positions
because even though the stock market has been volatile but you know kind of just sideways this year
even though a little bit volatile underneath this surface this individual stocks this dispersion
is very volatile so you have individual stocks that are very volatile this year and so if you're not
just you know in holding an index right that um or you know an ETF this by whatever your
name does visual stockholder those stocks have been moving wildly and so you might have to get rid
of something that you you know that has been working and it's kind of that we you know kind of
you know I keep saying kind of like the tips market is back right so this year the 10 year yield
has climbed from I think 172% it's like February 27th right before uh a rap or a rap Iran
more started um and now it's at about 1.86% so that direction is kind of killing sentiments on oil
I mean on gold it's you know sniffing out that inflation we've got rate cuts almost priced out
entirely this year but doesn't hold usually do good the more inflation signals we have well
not necessarily the gold does well when rate cuts are coming and we've priced out almost you know
all of them for this year and there's and we're almost about to price out the December one
and gold does not like that and so it's back to kind of originally what
it started from from what it started from and then you know with silver it carries the same rate
sensitivity plus industrial demand gets crushed under stagnationary conditions and so silver's
sniffing that out too because longer this war lasts the higher energy prices remain uh for
longer that is going to be a real drag on the economy so the the question with with silver is
the funding forgetting about the war but looking fundamentally beyond the war aren't the
fundamentals still there can supply no new discovery endless data center cap ex you know I mean
shouldn't the laws of supply and demand kick in with that they could but I think this is just a
reactionary to the market I mean I you know we have copper pulling back too right so I think
who said you know if we have elevated oil prices for a long time is that going to be a drag
globally on the global economy um but I the fundamentals for all of these products are still
there 100 percent it's just being massed right now and if you know if you really like copper and
silver this is not a bad you know and you missed it it's not you know bad time to get your maybe
start getting your feet wet a little bit yeah because I think a lot of people that are trying to
doom it and then every time it goes down for a day like like a half a percent relative to like
200 percent that it went up over the last you know two years they go crazy but if you look before
the war gold was holding the 5,000 marker and silver was also holding they just have this benchmark
because for a couple days when I when I was in January February it just went nuts to you know
past as a benchmark that it wasn't ready for 5,500 gold and silver would well over 100 but then
it was generally holding where it should so I would imagine the war is more of an aberration
than a paradigm shift with that where do you see us in about a year from now what big
shoe do you think is going to drop what big economic or financial um shoe do you think is going
is going to fall from from all this declaration well uh you know I I think actually currently and
I think it's going to get worse is private credit markets we're already seeing private credit
crumble we've had you know uh few companies richest recently that uh have had problems
and I am worried even though everybody says it's under control I've heard that before um I'm
worried that there's going to be kind of a contagion um going on in that so I am worried about
a credit event a credit event and I guess that's just a function of the people at some point people
are tapped out and the cards are tapped out they just don't have the money to support the current
prices and then this is before the big employment crisis really crystallizes when you have this many
young people that can find the job at a college this many people of all ages that once they're
laid off the duration of unemployment appears to be growing so that's got to take its toll on credit
wouldn't that also at some point start putting pressure on housing of closures of course it'll
put pressure on everything is that gross and then you have people also talking about AI right and
how that's going to displace so many jobs now whether that comes to fruition or not I've heard
that before you know I we heard that the internet was going to do that and it didn't just created
other jobs which I'm a believer in that but if you believe the hype that you know yeah I kind of
put us all out of work then that you should definitely be worried about that as well no and it's
actually it's not that AI is doing the jobs because it actually is not in my view it's more
in pursuit of the cat-backs their the companies are bankrupt and now they're letting
them go it's nothing to do it's not in the way that they predicted right exactly I saw that
and that is now letting a bunch of people go because it's spending too much money
of these companies it's sort of like they're basically you know convincing us if I go up to you
and I say get rid of all your wealth all your weapons because we're going to create something
that's so much so you first get rid of everything under the hope of doing this and it's
it's bad it is it is it is bad I don't I don't even know what we do with this um but I I agree I
still think the fundamentals of of gold and and silver certain toppers is going to be especially
after this reset is pretty low um when do you think the housing market's going to crack it's got
a crack well I think we are you know I think in some cities you're starting to see that a little bit
right it's just this country is so big it really depends on where you're living right so you know
I think it might take a while and it will probably be very uneven across the country uh because of
the k-shaped economy also I mean I hate to keep going back to that but it is what it is um and so
you'll probably have you know wealthy cities doing very well um unless you vote in a communist like
New York did but you know um so you're going to have cities that that are going to do really well
and a lot of this country won't be doing well because I just don't understand we were going crazy
with 550,000 more sellers than buyers now it's up to 600,000 so don't tell me that's a supply issue
at least in the national aggregate it's more there's a stalemate now with with the rates that
you know the sellers want to hold on to that nostalgia of the z estimate and buyers can't afford it
but at some point that's got to move to the buyers because the money ain't there they got to sell it
600,000 more sellers I just don't understand how long people who need to sell could hold on
yeah I mean we just will have to find out and we have mortgage rates going back up again just as
they were coming back down right we're at 6.22% now we were just below 6% well that's Powell's fault
because he could just set it at zero and then mortgages will be free you know and I mean like look
I just we have no leadership and I think Tracy like it's incumbent upon us to give a vision of what
free market capitalism actually does and doesn't look like and how it benefits people because if we
don't do that you know people like Mamdani and Bernie Sanders will tap into this and rightfully
diagnose certain symptoms without who where they came from without regard to where they came from
but they will diagnose the symptoms and I mean this is not working for people and I just look at the
malgamation of priorities from this administration and it's like I just I feel like a
different view than what we were told going into into this we just can't have nice things where
could people find your how often are you on the air where could people find that so I'm on the air
I have a macro show Monday through Thursday at 8 to 8 30 in the morning and then I have I'm on
Twitter obviously at shy girl and then renegade resources dot pro is my sub stack anything energy
commodity related to which is the big discussion now with the war you're going to want to tune into
that Tracy thanks so much and definitely keep us updated thank you all righty folks so again
that was Tracy shoe card um you know always smart analysis there check out our sub stack really really
quality stuff make sure you like and subscribe on YouTube I I don't know what's going on with iTunes
why it doesn't load it didn't load yesterday's show until today so again if you ever don't see it
and I don't announce ahead of time that I'm going to be absent I'm likely not absent so then check
YouTube um that was kind of ridiculous and I do apologize for that let me know your comments
questions concerns Daniel Harwoods at startmail.com until next week have a godly terrific family
oriented weekend see you back here same time same place Monday
Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz
