The Countdown to the Deadline, Plus Prosecutors Slam Delay Request Filed by Tyler Robinson Defense

Hey guys, it's Jack.

I wanted to let you know that we're starting a new push for subscriptions here on human

events daily.

So make sure that when you're listening to this podcast, you hit subscribe, you download

it and you share it with five of your friends.

Make sure they're all going and downloading as well because we need to get the signal

out as much as possible.

Look, we've done so much over the past couple of years since this show started and we're

only going to do so much more.

Let's get it.

This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.

A commentator, international social media sensation and form a Navy intelligence veteran.

This is human events with your host, Jack Pesovic.

Christ is King.

Donald Trump says he has given Iran a final notice.

Do a deal by tomorrow night at 8 p.m. Eastern or he said we're blowing up the whole country.

We have a plan because of the power of our military where every bridge in Iran will be

decimated by 12 o'clock tomorrow night where every power plant in Iran will be out of

business, burning, exploding and never to be used again.

I mean, complete demolition by 12 o'clock.

The president telling reporters yesterday it would take less than four hours for the

U.S. to destroy Iran's power plants and bridges, Iranian officials called the president

delusional.

The entire country can be taken out in one night.

The president brushing off any suggestion that hitting those targets would constitute committing

a war crime.

I hope I don't have to do it.

It is issuing this warning this morning here saying a whole civilization will die tonight

if a deal isn't made to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran rejected a proposed 45-day ceasefire deal on Monday saying they want a permanent

end to the war instead.

North Korea appears to be quietly pulling back from longtime partner Iran while keeping

its options open with the United States.

New reports of explosions on Kharg Island.

This handles almost all of Iran's oil exports about 90 percent.

If you look at that map, it's actually, yeah, you can see it all the way up there at

the top of the Persian Gulf.

They're just off the coast of Iran.

President Trump has repeatedly threatened to bomb or seize the island and there have been

strikes before.

We feel confident that we can get a response, whether it's positive or negative, we're

going to get a response from the Iranians by eight o'clock tonight.

I hope they make the right response because what we really want is we want a world where

oil and gas is flowing freely, where people can afford to heat their homes and pull their

homes, where people can afford to transport themselves to work.

That's not going to happen if the Iranians are engaged in acts of economic terrorism,

so they've got to know we've got tools in our toolkit that we so far haven't decided

to use.

The President of the United States can decide to use them and he will decide to use them

if the Iranians don't change their force of conduct.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events.

Daily, we're here live on real America's voice.

Today is April 7, 26, Anno Domini, President Trump coming out early today with perhaps

his most belligerent language yet regarding this evening's deadline.

We are six hours away now from this deadline that he's given to the Iranian leadership

talking about destroying the civilization, talking about total and complete regime change,

but also saying that perhaps there can be a way to move on past this and reaching out

to the people of Iran itself.

And when you look at what is out there within the United States military arsenal right now

within the region, within the area, you've got you have got multiple carriers.

You've got the Lincoln right there in the Indian Ocean.

You've got the Ford and I've been tracking on this.

It looks like the Ford is still operating in the Eastern Mediterranean, that's CVN 78 operating

in the East Med out of port from Croatia, and then of course, we've got the USS George

H. W. Bush, CVN 77 has departed its home port as of yesterday.

And we're told that it is also making its way to the Middle East.

So that's two aircraft carriers within range of Iran as well as their entire fighter and

bomber compliments on them as well as the surface combatants.

So 813 Arlie Burke guided missile destroyers spread across the Arabian Sea, the Red Sea,

the East Med, the straight-of-war Moose approach is the Persian Gulf and the Persian Gulf,

as we know, are in the Persian Gulf region.

That's your Tomahawk capability, also of course, your submarines, the United States has as

well in the area, the total combat ships, the Ken Barra, the Tulsa, the Santa Barbara,

operating that had been based out of Iran and those marine ships, the Tripoli and the

Boxer, which we know are within region as well.

Not to mention, of course, the air assets that we have simply from the United States Air

Force, bombers, fighters, those F-18 Echo strike eagles, the B-2 bombers, the multiple

refuelers that we have to be able to keep this up.

All, of course, can be brought to bear today on or tonight, at least in on US East Coast

time, Eastern Standard time, where we've seen the ability of the administration to strike

into Iran itself, now potentially looking to strike oil refineries, oil infrastructure,

other infrastructure, including the bridge that we saw that was targeted over the weekend.

Carga Island, the president, has made numerous posts about other military infrastructure,

could certainly be hit as well as defense infrastructure within Iran.

And so we could see quite a bit tonight, or things potentially could go down another

road.

That's what we're here, of course, at human events daily, setting up and being prepared

to cover in full, and we'll be able to give you all those details as it sees fit, but

as it comes down to now, as it comes down to now, President United States, the world,

Iran, all weight, and everything is held in the balance, six hours to go.

We will be here.

I know I'll be here, and human events daily will always be here.

In fact, we'll be right back.

We're here on Real America's Voice, ladies and gentlemen, C2.

We'll stand in our way, and our golden age has just begun.

This is human events with Jack Psova.

Now it's time for everyone to understand what America first truly means.

Welcome to the second American Revolution.

Our folks, Jack Psova, back live here, human events daily, and folks let me be blunt.

Before the crashes of 1999 and 2008, a rare market signal appeared.

Most people ignored it.

The smart money did not.

Golden stocks were rising at the same time, and that is not normal.

Stocks were supposed to rise when confidence is strong.

Stock rises when confidence starts to break.

It moved in opposite directions until something underneath the system is off, and right now

they're both breaking records again.

This has only happened twice before major market repricing events.

Does that mean the crash is tomorrow?

No.

But it does mean risk may be dangerously mispriced.

Gold doesn't surge because it's popular.

It moves on currency confidence weakens.

Dead explodes and central banks prepare quietly behind the scenes.

And here's what should get your attention, banks are buying gold at record levels right

now.

They're not guessing.

Gold doesn't depend on earnings, doesn't depend on credit markets, doesn't depend on

political promises, stocks do.

And if you have a savings or retirement account, you don't get a do over.

This is about protection, not speculation.

Call 844-577-Poso or visit ProtectWithPoso that's P-O-S-O dot com.

That's 844-577-7676 or ProtectWithPoso dot com.

Learn how a gold IRA can help shield what you have worked decades to build.

Call 845-577-7676.

Well, folks, last week there was much Ballyhoo online about a defense filing that took place

in the Tyler Robinson case.

And of course, this is the case determining the outcome of guilt, not guilt, right?

On the question of who murdered Farley Kirk.

And that went hyper viral because of a completely out of context, defense claim made by the

Daily Mail.

It was ridiculous.

It was community noted.

And many people shared it without any real, you know, any real critical thinking.

But in reality, anyone who thought about it for two seconds when they were making this

question about claims regarding the Ballistics report in Charlie's murder, they didn't

actually look into what the article itself said or what the report itself said.

Well, that was from the defense side.

Now the prosecutors have made their response and they're pretty much slamming not only all

of the arguments that the defense made in their briefing, but also they are coming up

and pointing out that these that once again, these are delay after delay after delay tactics,

not only in the case itself, but in the preliminary hearing, which is set to take place just a

little over one month away from today.

I believe it's May 18th for the preliminary hearing because keep in mind, folks, Tyler

Robinson has not even had this because of the way Utah politics works or excuse me, the

Utah courts were the Tyler Robinson has not yet had to plead guilty or not guilty.

He hasn't even entered that formal plea yet.

So the preliminary hearing, which is the hearing where the problem causes brought the charges

are brought, there's even the reason for charges brought and then the evidence is laid

out.

That hasn't even occurred yet and this is the way Utah law works, but again, the lawyers

keep trying over and over and over to delay his defense team attempts to delay and what's

interesting is that the case and we brought this up last week, the situation regarding

this Ballistics report, they said, oh, well, you know, the ballistics, it's, you know,

we haven't been able to get a match yet between the rifle and the bullet fragment that

was recovered during Charlie's autopsy.

What's going on with that?

Well, as it turns out, that further testing hasn't been able to occur because of a delay

in the case of the bullet fragment that was caused by the defense's own objection in

the first place.

And so the state's responding here saying, this is completely ridiculous.

They're making an argument that the delay should give cause for delaying the actual hearing

itself.

When the state responds, the reason that there's a delay is you objected to the testing.

Why are they objecting to the testing?

Why don't they want more testing being done in the ballistics here?

This is all very confusing from the perspective of a client that would be perhaps, oh, I

don't know, innocent, but of course, completely consistent with the idea that these are all

delayed tactics because they know their client is, in fact, guilty and doesn't really have

anything else to stand on.

So here to walk me through and all of us through this and perhaps if I've got any my legal

analysis incorrect, he will be certain to correct me is Will Chamberlain from the article

three project.

Will, how are you?

I was going to be with you, Jack, I'm doing good.

Will and and as we know, look, I always get my nomenclature wrong on this, but is my

general sense on this correct?

And I read through this document in full last night as well as, by the way, the daily

caller and I'll shout out to those guys, they released some information.

I'm not going to get into it right now, but more about the day of what happened on September

10th, 2025 on that campus, they've got a response from the campus, not a lot in there, but some

interesting tidbits I want to get into later.

But will regarding this, is that kind of what we're seeing or are we seeing the prosecutors

just get a little frustrated about these delayed tactics?

A little bit.

I mean, I think they just are responding to a pretty bad and weak motion in the way that

I would expect prosecutors to respond with the correct arguments here.

I mean, let's understand what is this motion trying to do?

They're not trying to delay the trial in the motion itself.

They're trying to delay a preliminary hearing where there's a question of whether there's

probable cause.

And at the preliminary hearing, all the evidence that the prosecutors present is evaluated

in the way most favorable to the prosecution, because the idea is like, can we even go forward

with a case at this point?

And so the defense is argument as well.

We haven't completed all expert discovery yet, meaning we haven't exchanged expert reports,

had our experts review their expert reports, blah, blah, blah.

So we can't even have a preliminary hearing because we haven't done that.

Well, that's bogus.

Expert discovery is one of the last things that you handle in either civil or criminal

discovery.

And in the criminal context, doesn't get completed before you can have a preliminary hearing

because all you need to do is it's the same probable cause is the same thing you need

to arrest somebody.

So in the same way that they had probable cause to arrest the guy, obviously, given the

enormous weight of evidence they were able to uncover even within 48 hours, they clearly

have probable cause to have a there's sufficient probable cause to have a preliminary hearing.

And moreover, the prosecutors have turned over every bit of evidence they've had to

do the defense.

There's no prejudice.

And the final point I'll make before I'll let you get back to this, if the defense really

had some gotcha piece of evidence here or some gotcha fact, like the one that was blasted

all over the daily mail and blasted all over social media a week ago.

If that was really dispositive, they would be rushing to trial.

They would want to get to trials quickly as possible to prevent the prosecutors from fixing

their case, but they don't have that.

They're just throwing stuff out randomly to the media to create doubt.

And then they're also trying to delay, delay, delay what they see.

I'm sure as an inevitable outcome here, well, and to your point, that something dispositive

would be say, Oh, I don't know a case where the actual daily mail's headline had stood

up.

So if that had stood up under scrutiny where it said, Hey, we conducted ballistic analysis

of this, this bullet that was found in the victim's autopsy and this rifle.

And we found that it's not the same rifle.

Oh my gosh.

They would be, they would be saying, let's go to trial right now.

This will be great or quite, quite frankly, they probably wouldn't be having to have

this argument in court motions.

They'd probably be talking in person about whether or not these charges should continue.

That would be the type of evidence that you'd be looking for.

If you have ballistics, if you have ballistics disproving the prosecution's theory, then

there wouldn't be probable cause, which means you'd want a preliminary hearing.

So you could get your client out of jail because then the judge might agree.

There's no probable cause in toss the case.

But no, that's not what's happening at all, obviously.

No, so that's, that's not what, which, and by the way, so if, if you were someone, right,

who fell for that daily mail headline and we had people, I had a Vita Duffy on here and

it was a great interview because she didn't fall for it, but she did want confused.

She said, I was confused by it.

I didn't understand, you know, what it really meant and what it meant for the case.

And then we walked through it and explained how there the end and will I, I love the way

we put that because the actions of the defense team don't even line up with what people

are saying that these headlines mean because you're exactly right.

They would want to continue the trial.

And in fact, Erica herself has said many times, including invoking this special victims

privilege that Utah has where they push for the speedy, right, the right to speed trial

to go forward as a victim's right, which is something, by the way, the state brings up

multiple times in this motion to say, look, you know, we've got competing rights here.

And you guys just want to delay, delay, delay, delay, I mean, it has been over six months

and we haven't even had a preliminary hearing yet.

Yeah, that's exactly right.

I mean, you know, you can ignore the daily mail headlines and look at what the defense

is asking, what the defense is trying to accomplish, a defense that had clear cut evidence that

their client was innocent would not try and delay a preliminary hearing while their client

is remanded on bail.

Remember Tyler Robinson is not out of jail.

He is sitting in jail.

And if you're a lawyer with a client sitting in jail, who you believe is innocent and who

you have evidence to demonstrate is innocent, you'd be rushing to the courthouse.

You'd be trying to get a hearing ASAP because you could put an end to this nonsense very,

very quickly, right?

And you have actually evidence of actual innocence, which is what this would be.

And but that's not, that's not of course what the defense is doing.

And instead they're talking to daily mail, they're trying to delay, delay, delay because

they want to take as much time as possible to create stuff like the daily, mail headline

to create doubt in the minds of a potential future durable.

And that's clearly what's going on here.

The game that is being played is not whether or not the trial, you know, the game that's

being played is not weighing the evidence or in the case, it's weighing the narrative

warfare.

It's the narrative warfare and the information warfare or something I'm quite familiar

with that is going on prior to this getting into court because the more time you're outside

of court, the more time you can use to push whatever theories you want or whatever nonsense

or whatever out of context or spin that you can put on something into the minds of any

potential juror, seed whatever narratives you want out into the populace and then and

only then until you feel like you've got to that point, then you can go to trial.

So it doesn't seem to be a rush to want to go to trial at all.

Why is that if you're so concerned with the innocence of your client, really simple,

get back.

Jack Sobick will Chamberlain from events daily.

They talk about influences, these are influences and they're friends of mine, Jack or Sobick,

where's Jack?

Jack?

We've got a great Jack.

All right, ladies and gentlemen, we're back here, human events, daily, real America's

voice.

And I want to dig in through some more of this filing and the latest update in the Tyler

Robinson case, Utah prosecutors responding to that headline last week and I should say

that motion that generated a headline that went viral, but it was a complete misleading

claim that they're now pushing it back against these delay tactics completely.

But here's an important line, I think, that really jumped out at me is aside from forensic

reports.

So they talk about all the forensics and all the hoopla around the forensic situation.

And of course, we need to get into all that as well.

But they also state aside from all the forensics, the evidence will also include images of

the defendant at the scene incriminating evidence in his possession.

No further information, NFI on that and multiple confessions.

So will I want to get on you on here real quick to explain this to us when they're saying

that we have this evidence outside of the forensics?

Is that what they're going for in terms of trying to say, look, the forensics are there,

but even without the forensics, we could still make our case.

Yeah, no, it's totally not necessarily not for a preliminary hearing, right?

You've got, even without forensics, you've got the pictures of the guy and then you've

got all the confessions and then you've got the process that led to him being turned

in.

That's all testimonial evidence.

So you have sufficient, I mean, all of that is sufficient for probable cause.

I mean, remember, they didn't have, you know, when they made the arrest, they didn't have

DNA evidence.

I don't think from Tyler Robinson yet because obviously they didn't know who he was.

They caught him on the basis of the video evidence and then the family turning him in.

That, and that was sufficient for probable cause.

So, you know, none of this is, there's, I mean, it's just an example like there's so much

evidence here.

This is not a case that comes down to the forensics on the gun, although obviously the

forensics, the gun support the prosecution because his DNA is all over it.

But yeah, this is, it's pretty simple.

And in fact, I believe there's also going to be, and this is in the case, this is in

this filing as well, they're bringing up again, a screwdriver, which was found on the roof

of the building, the Swords and Center, because presumably because that screwdriver was

used to reassemble the gun that he had used it in a state of, of disassembly where, you

know, part of it was down one leg and part of it was sort of underneath the shirt and he

concealed it in his clothing so that he could be able to walk up to that roof, then uses

the screwdriver to reassemble it, takes the shop.

But for whatever reason, you know, I'm sure in his haste leaves the screwdriver with the

DNA on it, the touch DNA on it on the roof.

And so, well, that's important because that, not only is that put him, you know, kind

of explained the concealing process, but as we can see, even in the images that are being

shown right now that we don't see any rifle in the images, we just see this strange gate,

which is, you know, later explained by the concealing of the rifle, but also it puts

them on the top of the roof.

So it, you know, forensically they can say, well, this guy was on the roof when we know

because the screwdriver was found on the roof, et cetera, et cetera.

And also, by the way, we know from the defense filing, when you mentioned testimony, 11

incidents, what we're going to see is his parents who played a huge part, obviously played

the key part in identifying him to law enforcement are going to be called to testify or at least

are on the witness list and expected to testify as well as his boyfriend.

And I'm sure that the parents are going to be asked to testify regarding the identification

and make sure that they're able to hold up the story that's in the charging document.

And then the boyfriend, more than likely, is going to be asked to attest to the veracity

of these text messages that they've presented.

And I'm sure they're going to look at him and say, you know, show them the text and say,

hey, we're, we're these your messages and, you know, we're these his responses.

Do I have that right?

Yeah, that's, I mean, that's the kind of thing you'd put them up there to say anything,

you know, you'd put the family up there to explain.

You'd walk from through the story of how they discovered, they thought it was him.

What, what Tyler would have said to them because you, that might be hearsay, but it's

it's a admission, a, you know, admission against interest.

So there's that's one of many hearsay exceptions that would likely be available here.

So they'd almost certainly be able to bring in testimony as to every go ahead.

So let me ask you that admission against interest.

So are you saying in the fact that, you know, that a father and mother don't have an interest

in turning their own child in?

Correct.

But I'm talking about it's, they could also probably testify as to what Tyler said

when they confronted him because Tyler's statements would be admissions against interests.

They'd also probably qualify as excited utterances.

So they're, you know, you, you'd think, Oh, it's hearsay, right?

Like, you know, it would be the parents testifying about what somebody else said.

That's classic hearsay.

But in that case, it's, it's a very, very clear, except though there's obvious exceptions

that would apply to that party, it's also the admissions of the party and interest.

That's, that's another hearsay exception.

So it's, you know, that testimony would come in as well.

So they could go through the whole story about how they figured out, how they identified

Tyler in those photos, how they confronted him, how he responded, all of it can come into

evidence.

And now in this hearing, so they're, they're calling evidence, excuse me, calling witnesses,

their testifying defense has their role to play.

What do you, when they're walking through a story like this and when you have the boyfriend

up there as well, what, what sort of cross examination would you then expect to find from the

defense team, you know, they're, you know, these, these are his parents.

These are some of the people that he's closest with in his entire life.

So what, what do you really do with a situation like that?

You might do nothing.

That's actually a really hard cross to do effectively, especially, I mean, I think what

you might want to do, you might bring them back on your own direct to try and discuss

sort of more independent matters about his character, about whatever you think you

might be able to get out of them in a positive way.

But cross is limited to the issues brought up on direct examination.

So I don't know unless you, you really can want to hurt one of these people, may you

go after the boyfriend and try and put more of the blame on him somehow.

But even if you did that, you'd, you'd still be condemning your client because if you're

a boyfriend, if the boyfriend's at fault, they clearly the client pulled the trigger.

So there's not really a lot of cross examination material there.

Well, and will you know, and that's going to come up is, you know, let's not get too far

ahead of ourselves.

But if, if he has found indeed guilty, because this is a capital case, I certainly believe

that's when the influence of the boyfriend or just influence of others is going to come

up, will be in the death penalty phase.

Yeah, I think that's right.

Yeah, will Chamberlain work people go to follow you and get your work at will Chamberlain

on X and a 3paction.com to follow with the article three project is up to.

And check him out and check out the article as well, folks, up on the post millennial.

And you don't have to take my word for it.

Check it out in full.

We got Kevin Pasobic.

We had him in studio yesterday where he able to sit down and pre tape a couple of great

segments with him.

So make sure you stay tuned.

You've never seen this before.

Some of the hottest issues going on in our world, this Easter season, human events

daily right back.

Where's Jack?

Where's Jack?

Where is he?

Jack, I want to see you.

Great job, Jack.

Thank you.

What a job you do.

You know, we have an incredible thing.

We're always talking about the fake news and the bad.

But we have guys, and these are the guys should be getting policies.

All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard.

We're back here, human events daily.

And folks, I got to tell you something.

I was, so I was down on, on a little bit of a, out of the town.

I was out of town this weekend.

I just put it down for a little bit.

Had to sleep on a hotel bed.

And my back was killing me.

I did not like this bed.

It was so rough and lumpy and just bad.

Everything about it was just bad.

And I woke up and you know what, you sleep on a bad bed.

And then you just, you feel crappy all day.

That's all I felt on this thing.

And then I went home.

And I went home to my ghost bed.

And let me tell you something.

We got Kevin Pistobic here in studio.

Kevin!

That's right.

You famously do not invest in anything.

You don't even sleep on a mattress, do you?

Especially when we travel, I get the couch.

Yeah, Kevin, you either sleep on the couch, the floor at home.

You just gotta make it.

You got a couple of burlap sacks on the floor, right, at home.

That's right.

Something like that, just on top of each other.

Kevin, we need to get you a ghost bed.

And you know, actually, because you're down in Florida,

most of the time you're here in DC right now,

but you're down in Florida most of the time.

They even have their setup right down in Florida,

because they're family owned.

They're family operated.

Three generations are doing business.

Let me tell you something.

Me and Tanya, Tanya and I have the hybrid bed.

So that's, it's sort of like, it's a regular mattress.

You have the support of a regular mattress,

combined with the memory foam.

So giving you that customizable, you know,

sort of like built to you feeling

of the custom bed that you would get with memory foam.

But it's a little bit more supports.

You can actually roll off it.

You can move.

It's like the other.

You don't sink into it.

You don't sink, which it just drives me nuts.

Well, in the memory foam, I did it once years ago.

We had one.

I forget, gosh, I want to say probably with Tanya

and I have like first got together.

We had that one and I just, I couldn't do it.

I couldn't do it at all.

Here's the coolest thing about the ghost bed.

You're going to love this because Kevin,

I know you're someone.

You like to, you like to take your time with things.

You like to move slow.

You like to, you like to kind of really get your teeth

into something.

So ghost bed, listen to this.

For 101 nights, we'll allow you to try ghost bed at home.

And if you don't feel the difference,

you can send it back.

Risk. How about free?

So right now, ghost bed is offering our audience

and offering that includes you, Kevin.

Okay.

Their lowest prices of the season plus an extra 10% off.

How do you get it?

It's ghostbed.com.

And remember, of course, it's promo code POSO.

At ghostbed.com slash POSO, again,

that's ghostbed.com slash POSO promo code POSO.

You got to check it out.

So Kevin, one of the reasons that,

well, you hear in DC, I wanted to sit down with you

and get you on is this news.

And I see report after report coming out this Easter.

I think it started with the New York Times.

Roman Catholic Church sees a surge of new converts.

New Jersey seeing surge in people

converting to Catholicism.

Iowa surge in Catholic converts.

And just over and over and over.

Headline after headline after headline

of reports of a surge in Catholicism.

And Kevin, I know that you're someone

who's been tweeting about this.

Obviously, you and I were both raised.

Catholic, St. Pat's got our sacraments done.

So what is it, though?

So coming from the perspective of two cradle Catholics,

what do you see as a rise and a return

to Catholicism and specifically traditional Catholicism

with the Latin Mass?

What do you attribute this to?

Oh my goodness.

Well, what do I attribute it to?

Would be the Holy Spirit, of course.

No question. No question.

And I would attribute it to this decline in culture

all around.

As we see in cities, the degradation of just the social contract

really, we've got third worlders coming in.

And then we're going to come in cultures, clashing.

So we're seeing that nationwide.

And if not worldwide, arguably worse in Europe.

But I would attribute it to a rejection of that.

And we spoke about this.

So a rejection of modernity?

A rejection of modernity, absolutely.

Yeah.

And especially among zoomers in that we

discussed this all the time between that.

They have this purity thing, where

they're either hard all the way this way

or hard all the way against that way.

There's really, I put it this way.

Zoomers have no middle.

There's no middle.

Yeah.

So they're very interested in coming back to, oh my goodness,

everybody's dressed in sharp.

I'm not the most dressed sharp today.

But women are wearing dresses again and veils even.

And what's this all about?

So it's a balance between that.

And then also, we have these pizza parties

like springing up all over New York City.

And it's one thing to be like, hey, come into the church

with grease and pepperoni slices, stains on your shirt,

come in or whatever, go into social.

You do want to be forwarded.

I would suggest, by the way, maybe do the social aftermath.

That's what we're talking about.

Yeah, you are actually.

And as cradle cats, we can point out

that you are supposed to fast one to two hours prior

to receiving convenience.

But even that's being walked back via modernity.

No, I don't like that.

We don't like that.

I fast before milk.

Come here.

I've always done it.

I actually can't think of a time that I didn't do it.

I really, and it bothers me.

It actually bothers me if I eat before community.

So it's exciting.

It's amazing.

This tidal wave surge of conversions coming in.

And that's, of course, what we want.

But how do we make it?

So it's not just another New Year's resolution, where

you go to the gym for a week or a month,

and then it's not trendy anymore.

And how do we retain these new souls?

Because it's much more than just, OK, it's

gym season or a tanning season.

This is your life.

This is your soul we're talking about here.

And I'm getting a lot of that.

I have a lot of Catholic sources.

I have sources in New York City.

So we'll have to follow up on this.

A lot of Catholic sources.

A lot of Catholic sources.

I do.

You do.

You're trying to do them.

So you still got your Vatican press ID from the family, right?

You got yours, too, brother?

So that's what we're focused on.

Of course, we want socials.

But we want to be modest about this.

Yes, hopefully have it after mass.

And there's nothing wrong with that.

My church outside of Philadelphia,

we would have coffee and donuts in the basement.

You have men's night.

Sometimes you can have women's night.

And the priest himself will be down there in the basement

as the bartender.

Just getting the guys together, cigars, beer, liquor, whatever,

and have fraternity.

And of course, ideally, it's much more than that.

We want to be seeing group rosaries.

We want to be seeing Bible studies.

We want to be reading papal encyclicals.

This is called Holy League and instituted by a Cardinal Burke.

Well, I'm sorry, it was resurrected by Cardinal Burke.

So we have National Catholic Register reports

that 1.4 billion people are now Catholic.

And New York City, the DICE yesterday,

reported around 3,500 converts.

And it's great.

It's amazing.

In the whole city, 3,500 in New York City.

Yeah, in New York City.

That's amazing.

So again, yeah, how do we retain this?

Because the whole trad influencer thing is kind of getting

bashed online and everybody thinks it's about one thing.

It's not a brand.

It's not like a lifestyle brand.

It's a way of life.

It's a way of actually living for something bigger than yourself.

It's living for God.

It's living as Christ instituted when Christ brought the church.

And a lot of my friends, of course, we read the Bible.

Remember Jesus didn't write a book.

He founded a church.

And so for many of us, that's the way

that we try as hard as possible as we can to live.

And as Catholics, of course, we say,

what is a good Catholic?

A Catholic is a bad Catholic trying

to be a good Catholic, right?

That's a good Catholic.

That's right.

And by the way, another example of this,

just to throw out there, is that we have JD Vance.

We have the new book coming out from our vice president

talking about his conversion to Catholicism,

where he sort of started as a low church evangelical.

He moved to Methodist, or maybe Pentecostal,

and then eventually to Catholicism

and sort of his faith journey.

And a lot of people are on these faith journeys.

And I certainly wouldn't throw out to anybody

that we're ecumenical here.

We're not saying that you have to be one or the other.

But we are saying that we are Catholics.

And we've always been Catholics

who Polish only come in one flavor that way.

And that it's just cool.

It's cool to see people having the interest.

And I hope they stick with it.

I think that's where you're coming from, too.

Yes, they absolutely stick with it.

And we should have them send their confirmation names

in the email, right?

Oh, yeah, so if, yeah.

Let us know your confirmation.

Let us know your confirmation.

But what's the name of JD's new book?

It's communion.

Communion.

OK, and that comes on the heels of Pope Leo XIV.

himself talked about communion specifically

because our Catholic sources are concerned

about the different rights.

So the Latin Mass itself being retained as well.

So he is addressing the communion

between the Nova Sordo masses

and Latin Mass is moving forward.

And that's that way.

So for folks, no, that's the Latin Mass

in the vernacular language.

That's Vatican II style, modern Mass

versus the ancient traditional Latin Mass.

Just so you know, Kevin is a big, big Latin Mass proponent.

But I believe he said that he didn't want there to be division.

He wants there to be communion and that he called it

the generous inclusion of those attached to the Latin Mass.

And we certainly appreciate Pope Leo's call

for the communion there, Kevin.

And I, of course, as you may remember, both attended

his papal conclave and his invector there in Rome.

Right back here at Human Events Daily,

Real America's Voice.

So we're going to call this the Jack Pasobic appreciation hour.

I can say confidently, I believe, I think Josh Shapiro

would be the vice presidential nominee

if it wasn't for Jack Pasobic.

And that is, I'll be honest.

All right, and we're back Jack Pasobic, Kevin Pasobic,

Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice.

Now, Kevin, I got to ask you this thing.

Did you see Superviral this past weekend?

So Fenway Park, they had their opener baseball seasons back.

And this was going all over the place, this video

that the Boston Red Sox posted of,

I guess it was just Boston in the 1950s

and you look at some of these scenes

and you look at the amount of virality that it went through.

And I think just looking at it, you know,

people say, wait a minute, you know,

what happened to our cities?

And for me, that's the reason it went so viral.

It wasn't so, and by the way,

I think they had to turn off the comments

that they got on it, yeah, on Twitter

because people were looking at this going,

oh my gosh, nobody's fat, everybody is well dressed,

everybody is clean, everything seems very bright

and obviously it's, you know, beautiful weather on this day

but you see, we've been wearing like white gloves

as they go to a baseball game

and it's just, you know, you compare that

and I'm just gonna say it, like I'm gonna say it right now

that there's nothing, look, you want a hot take?

Wait, guys, throw me up on this when I say this.

There is nothing, there is nothing worse

than I see in sports or anywhere

than when I go to go see some sporting event

or I go to watch sports on TV

and there's nothing worse than I see

than a bunch of women out there

just binge drinking, slamming beers,

Taylor Swift did it a couple of years ago at a chiefs game,

it's like, I'm sorry, it's disgusting behavior,

it's scummy behavior, it's not becoming

and it's just, it's atrocious, I'm just gonna call it out,

like I can't stand that stuff, man, I really can't.

Oh yeah, I mean, put this in perspective,

the Boston Red Sox Fenway Park is the oldest stadium

in Major League Baseball and it's downtown

in the middle of the city, okay?

It is the Holy Grail, okay?

And what we've seen here is, you know,

this is the land of the Green Monster, okay?

Left Field, this is a very, very, very famous stadium,

America's Pastime Jack and the land of Ted Williams, okay?

And this video is probably during the opening ceremonies

of one of his seasons, okay?

So, this is our pride, I mean,

this comes on the verge of America's 250th.

And by the way, we say this, we say this as Billy Guys,

as a lot of respect, have nothing but respect for Fenway Park,

which we've been to many times, as both as kids

and as adults, checking out the Green Monster,

that nothing but respect, but even looking at Philadelphia,

when you go back, it isn't about the baseball,

it's about what happened to our cities.

And so, here's what I'm saying, all right?

People took a lot of this to heart

when I said, get out of cities in 2020, all right?

And that was necessary, but that was a tactical withdrawal,

a tactical withdrawal from cities.

Kev, I'm gonna say it, man,

I think it's time to start retaking the cities.

It's time to retake the cities,

and this is a big difference between, I think,

we talked about this before on the show,

between the rural right and the urban right,

the rural right and the urban right,

and for folks that aren't from cities,

I get it, people say, what do you go there for?

Cities are decrepit, cities are places where

there's nothing but crime,

there's where people go to die,

the gender behavior, and I'm not disputing any of that.

I'm really not.

I mean, you go look at Philadelphia, right?

It's disgusting, not the men, but here we are on Washington,

DC, and look how nice it is after President Trump

cleaned it up, with what?

Law and order, with the national guard, the deployments.

You go look at what Bukele did down in El Salvador, Kev.

Can we take our cities back by going Bukele

on every single city in America?

Oh, Bukeleying, that's a verb, if you will.

I mean, Lord knows I tried Jack,

I was in Philadelphia from 2016 to 2020.

Proper, I was working for a furniture company

and the urban right, we did push back a lot

against the drugs and the crime, but they tried it.

But what I'm saying is, you did that as one person,

or like one firm.

Oh, absolutely, yeah.

And it's, if people say, oh, I want to do this,

I want to do that, it's, you can't.

What did Trump say on Twitter, right,

or on true social rather?

He said, if you import the third world,

you become the third world, and that's not going to happen

to the United States of America,

as long as on the president.

And what did he do right after?

He posted a video, The Mall of America,

and how it's looking.

And he's talked about this urban decay.

Donald Trump is a man of the urban right.

The MAGA movement started on Fifth Avenue

on a golden escalator, all right?

So this movement is been done in reaction

to what's happened to our cities.

It is a reaction, yeah.

And we're seeing that across demographics, too.

You're seeing members of every race.

Who wants to live in a decrepit city?

Who wants to crime in their city?

No, no, and just like sporting events

when we were growing up would at least get a guy

like trying to sell you T-shirts before a game

or something.

We love the T-shirt now.

Concerts, you know?

It's just beggars, or yes, scalpen tickets.

Like now it's just beggars, or just homeless people.

They're not even trying anymore.

But yeah, we got to retake this,

and that starts with going to county meetings

to voice your opinions on new sanctuary city laws,

trying to be pressed, and immigration laws being pressed.

So go to your county meetings, voice your opinion.

That's definitely one way to do it.

Get organized.

There's no excuse nowadays.

I mean, we're breaking our backs,

trying to expose signal chats.

They're getting organized on the left.

And who's great at been doing that is Frankie Scales,

up in Philly, right?

That's right, search Philly's doing a great job.

A great job, search Philly's doing a great job.

And what does it come down to, folks?

It comes down to demanding law and order.

And the federal government has the ability

to do this in certain areas,

but they're not able to do so without the governors,

if you're talking about a blue state.

So Josh, he's Shapiro, sitting up there in Pennsylvania,

where some of these folks,

Crachu Whitmer, up in Michigan,

ain't going to happen, all right?

It ain't going to happen.

Although she has been a little bit better to Trump,

because she wants to run,

and she's got different designs on certain things.

But you look what he's done in Memphis.

You look what, when the governor called him in,

you look what he's done in, right here in Washington, D.C.,

you look what he's done in so many places.

It comes down to basic law and order.

And what do I mean by that?

I also mean enforcing the law.

I actually mean going after the worst of the worst,

going into the criminals,

and by the way, going down to the lower level.

You know what, they started going after the fair jumpers

here on the Washington Metro.

They went after the fair, and guess what?

That reduces crime, because when you leave,

yes, because it's those same fair jumpers

that cause most of the crime on the Metro itself,

the on the subways.

So again, it just goes back to Rudy Giuliani,

the Broken Windows Theory.

If you go after the low level crimes,

it will have a roll-up effect

where the higher level crimes, whether it be muggings,

whether it be murder, whether it be rape or worse,

things that were being done.

When you prosecute the low level crimes,

it sends a message to the whole city.

It even helps the economy too for the subway.

I mean, if people are afraid to go on the subways now,

I mean, for just the five reasons.

Exactly.

If you clean up the subways,

literally clean them up,

so they don't smell trash and urine and drugs.

So if you clean that up,

then there will be less traffic

for because what else are you gonna do?

Take a scooter to work?

No.

Take an Uber or a lift?

No, with somebody who might not have a valid license

in the personally, right?

And by the way, getting the illegals out of the cities too.

So deportations, mass deportations,

getting them out, reinstating Greg Bovino,

something that you and I certainly both agree with,

getting the commander back where he needs to be,

and getting these people out of our country.

Not only will that help our cities,

but also from the crime perspective,

it will also make our cities more livable, how will it do?

So by reducing the amount of people

because our cities are overcrowded.

So you've got this massive crowding of services

of people that shouldn't be in our country,

have no right to be in our country anywhere,

community crime, by being in our country

in the first place.

Get them out.

They shouldn't be here.

We don't want them around.

And guess what?

The crime will go with them as well.

As rents will go down, economics will go up.

And then you'll have more people willing

to come to the cities, more businesses opening in cities.

It's gonna be amazing.

Kevin, where can people go to follow you?

You can follow me on X, Kevin Posovic,

and at Instagram, same name.

This is our real names.

At Kevin Posovic, ladies and gentlemen,

there's always a part of our permission to lay ashore.