The Empire's Grip on Africa: TOTAL COLLAPSE Begins

the empire is using normally so-called independent states to attack other countries that are

vying for independence and sovereignty. That's what we're going to talk about in this video.

Like, comment and subscribe. Sign up for my free newsletter and links to the guests in the

description below. Morning PD, morning Harley. This is your first time together in a Zoom room

with me with my fabulous bookshelf. Thank you both for being here. Well, thanks for the invitation.

It's nice to get to meet PD. Yes, yes, yes, yes. Well, Harley, you should know you're always,

always, always, always welcome. And you will be back on my channel because I think next week we're

recording with Mr. Crana and PD, I've learnt so much from you about Africa, which is a of growing

importance and significance. One, because it's very young, very young population with a ridiculous

amount of resources, loads and loads of resources, that the great powers are vying over.

And you and I recently did a video. We've done a few videos on what's happening in Bikina Faso

with being headed up by Ibrahim Trawori. And essentially what he's doing is he's implementing

the American system of political economy, which I think is what Trump wants to implement in the

United States, and which is based on the ideas of Lyndon LaRouche, which is based upon the ideas

of Alexander Hamilton. So, and it's a, it's a counterweight to the city of London or the

empires, the European empires, the British empires, method of colonial extraction using financial

financial weaponry as a way of stealing resources and keeping people's poor while they

reach themselves at their expense. It's a good place to start. Yeah, it's a good place.

Well, okay then, Holly, take it away. Well, the first thing you have to realize is that Hamilton

has been subject to slander, misquoting. He's treated as an enemy by the city of London, which he was.

His whole idea was how do you achieve a sovereign financial system as coming out of colonialism,

because the United States in 1787, 1789 was in a situation very similar to a lot of states

in the global south, a large debt, a large potential, but no way to create a credit system

except by building something new. And that's what Hamilton did. And instead, he's accused of

using the model of the Bank of England, which was designed by the enemies of the American

Revolution, in particular John Locke, who is one of the first board members of the Bank of England.

People say Locke was the model for the American Revolution and the Declaration of Independence

and Hamilton's policies. It's actually actually the opposite. It was fought against John Locke's

model, which was user-y and property. And so to go with Hamilton means to figure out how to establish

the basis of internal credit generation to use the resources of your own country for the benefit

of your country, but not at the expense of others for mutual benefit. And that's what's needed in

the world today. 250 years after the Declaration of Independence, we're still fighting

the same principles. Sovereignty versus empire. Yeah. And finally, what you say is I find

interesting as someone who's been interested in politics. Since I was 18, so all of three years now,

that I have come across, you know, I read the Communist Manufesto at university and I studied

Mark Karl Marx and the ideas of the free market and Adam Smith and capitalism and social

democracy and all of that, never ever come across the American system political economy until

I started interviewing people like yourselves, you know, who are steeped in the ideas of

Lyndon and Ruchits, how he's been admitted completely admitted from the discourse.

Well, and that's why Ruch has been attacked so so much, especially from the city of London.

And his one of his seminal works, dope, incorporated about how the city of London finances

international operations led him to be accused of saying that it's the queen of England pushing

drugs as though she's out on Kensington Square selling dime packages of heroin or cocaine.

But in fact, it's a much more serious examination of what colonialism means.

Yes. And we could say, I think we could reasonably argue that the British monarchy

as figureheads for the city of London have been pushing drugs,

CF, the opium wars and the importation of fentanyl into the United States nowadays.

Okay, PD, so please follow one from what Harley said about the Hamiltonian system.

Well, I think that's beautiful because it is so relevant in what the Alliance of

Sahelian states are doing. You know, it's not even a question of, are they attempting to do it?

They are on the brink of creating an entirely new revolutionary system

as a blueprint for the continent. And that they've created the confederations. So Marlene

Niger, Bikina Faso have formed a triumvirate confederation of the three states.

And those three states have joined together in the vision of, in a shared vision of doing exactly

what Harley just said, progress in terms of its people, the nation. So they are all

constructing policy that will benefit the peoples of those three countries.

And they are on the brink, they haven't as yet, of having a common currency and withdrawing from

the CFA. The French treasury are used as the balancing mechanism for the Franco-Freak,

which is going to soon be irrelevant. So they have formed a bank, they haven't changed to

their own currency as of yet. And they are fulfilling their mandate very, very, very quickly

in starting manufacturing, in starting to keep all their natural resources for the benefit

of the nation rather than exporting them as a raw product. So everything is looking very,

very much like the American system of going back to JFK. I would love to bring in the fact that

at the moment you have so many people are saying what America is doing, some changes,

many changes are taking place in West Africa and the Trump. And the people are saying,

oh, this is imperialism on steroids. And my point that I would say is the most important point,

is if you go back to America and the John F. Kennedy and you look at how in the 1960s African

hits of state, the newly formed independent African states, we're all going to America to

visit Kennedy and they look towards America as a model of economic prosperity and of the nation's

state. Because America in those days was not an example of imperialism, it was the example of

the free world, everything that was anti-imperialist. And all those hits of state had the most

fantastic relations with John F. Kennedy. And of course, until he was assassinated and the whole

thing was derailed. So it's important. Yes, PD, thank you for that. And I just want to go back to

a couple of points. People maybe will not be familiar. So I think there are 33 third world nations

that don't have at least 33 third world nations that don't have their own currencies that are

European based. 19 of the of these third world nations are in the European Union and they're the

ones that have the euro. And then the others are in Africa. Now I may have got the numbers wrong,

maybe there's 19 in Africa. But what happens with the CFA is Paris essentially prints CFA's

and they're picked to the euro. And then it's a really good deal for Paris because they can print

these CFA's and then use them to buy gold in uranium from Marley and Mauritania and Bikina Faso.

What a great deal that is, Holly, why don't you after this video go and print some CFA's yourself

and then use it to buy gold from Bikina Faso. That's in fact what George Soros does.

That's the modern colonial model. As you go into a country that's not sovereign,

borrow its currency from the bank, drive the value of the currency up and then turn it in and

take whatever reserves the country has and steal them. That's what Soros did in the 1990s which

created the major Asia crisis at the end of the decade to derail temporarily the growth of

countries like Indonesia and Malaysia, which were leaders of the second wave of the non-aligned movement.

And so that's a very clever strategy, but countries are now onto it.

And the way, I just want to say in response to what PD said, the reason Kennedy was anti-colonial

was because Franklin Roosevelt came out of World War II with a commitment to end colonialism

on the planet. And there are accounts of his meetings with Churchill where they argued about

this and Roosevelt at one of these meetings said to Churchill, never again will we use American

treasure and manpower to defend the British empire. And Roosevelt's son, who was at that

dinner, said Churchill turned purple, had a coughing fit and retired for the night.

Now that's the tradition of the Hamiltonian policy. And it's important to note that the reason

that Hamilton is slandered is trying to set up the bank of the United States is to cover the

story so that people don't know that the bank of the United States was a total break with what

at the time was international finance controlled by London. That's amazing, Holly. And what that

speaks to is the United States anti-colonial tradition because it arose out of an anti-colonial

movement, antithetical to what the British were doing everywhere. And then it's been, I think,

since the Federal Reserve, since the City of London set up the Federal Reserve,

slowly, slowly, slowly, the United States has been captured. And now Trump, it seems, is out to get

the United States out from under the thumb of the City of London, which is why, of course, the

mainstream media in the United States in the UK just hate him with the vehemence that I don't

think he quite merits. Okay, now the other thing that you've addressed there, Holly, with what George

Horace did, is the whole notion, the bankruptcy of the cash crop mechanism, that UPD, you're this

African nation, if you grow lots and lots of coffee beans, don't grow other stuff, we'll buy the

coffee beans off you and then you'll be rich and prosperous, prosperous, which hasn't worked at all

for any African nation, really, that cash crop economy. So what's happening in the alliance of

economic state, this is a helium, a helium states, right? Marley, Mauritania, and Bikina Faso,

Marley, Nisha, and Bikina Faso. I think it's because Marley and Mauritania begin with Emma.

No, we want an N, N for Nisha, N for Nisha, okay, I won't bring Mauritius into it, Mauritius,

Mauritania. No, so Marley, Nisha, and Bikina Faso. No, we've done quite a bit on what's happening

in Bikina Faso, but what's happening in Marley and Nisha, what are they doing? They are doing

similar. So all three countries are working in tandem, policy-wise. You know, I recently wrote

an article which is on my website, Africanagenda.net, and it's titled London Uses Nigeria and Ghana

to attack the AES and Brexit. At the end of that article, I've transcribed a speech given that

last year's United Nations General Assembly by the Nigerian Prime Minister, and it's an incredible

speech. If you've got time to listen to it or to read through the transcript, I've highlighted a

lot of it. And he's talking about, so he is giving his Nisha's experience of jihadism,

of Western operations against the country and therefore against, and also Bikina Faso and Marley.

But it's a very insightful speech in terms of it really puts you in the picture.

And he talks about, you see, they're seeing it from the entirely different opposite perspective,

like UI and Hali, like all the people who come on your podcast yet. So we see the city of London,

we see the parasite, the financial parasite within the Western world that is always tried

to corrupt, to divide and to conquer. And they're seeing it from that perspective. And what he

goes into in this speech is the fact that they are facing a monumental media disinformation campaign.

He's seen nothing positive is written in the Western media about any of those three countries.

Nothing at all. Nothing is seen about the amazing things that they're doing in so many different

aspects, the number of roads built in Bikina Faso, the gold being staying in those countries of

origin. Marley, Bikina Faso, the uranium staying in Nishaia. And they are also saying that, you know,

the Sahel is a very extreme environment. And that people in the Sahel always had to bind together,

to work together to survive the environment. And that, therefore, they have learned to coexist

on ancestral values throughout time. And he says that all the terrorism or the division

is imported. It is not indigenous to their culture, to their land. It's a fantastic speech.

And it gives a flavor of how they are thinking, how they are experiencing the whole thing,

the whole onslaught against what is happening in the AES. Because they're being attacked on all

fronts by Ikavas, by the African Union, by the Western media. And therefore, we must really make

a point of making sure that we stand up for them. Because apart from, you know, the bricks from

Russia in particular, in particular, they are not being supported. We're just on Russia,

hopefully, in a few weeks' time, we're going to have a conversation with UPD and Professor

Vladimir Brovanik about the role of Russia in Africa. And how, you know, Russia is doing Africa

very differently to how the French and the Portuguese and the British and the Germans did Africa.

Thank goodness. Then something in what you said about the mainstream media,

yeah. It's been completely misrepresented in the mainstream media in the UK, for sure,

about what's happening in these three nations. And they're presented as dictators and stuff.

Because, of course, they don't want to present them as viable alternatives that are a threat to

city of London and Germany. And then, taking it to Nigeria and Ghana and the use of the

Islamist forces, when Nigerian Ghana are former British colonies, so they'll have lots and lots

of embedded ties to the city of London and the structures of empire. But, and Holly, you can come

in here. The Islamists, you know, England, Britain is a Christian nation. Islamists like

ISIS and Al Qaeda and Boko Haram, they're not four Christians. So why would they be doing the

bidding of the Christian imperial forces? Surely that's just PD propaganda.

Well, that's why you have to study history. If you look at the emergence of the anti-colonial

movement before and after World War II, what you find is that the British, in particular,

but also the French. The French were very dirty when it came to their imperial policy.

Yes. And in that sense, they were aligned with the British. They weren't going to leave the

continent. It was a gold mine, so to speak, for them. Any infrastructure they built was from the

mines to the ports, so they could steal it. And they also, it wasn't just resources. One of the

main resources they exploited was cheap labor. And they did that by preventing any government

from defending its population. Now, if you look at it from that standpoint, what you find,

and by the way, I really recommend what PD put in her article, the speech from the Prime Minister

of Niger. It's a very powerful and detailed explanation of what was done to the country

and how the colonial debt was used to enslave the country into the future. And why this fight is

so difficult? Because where do you go for credit if you're kicked out of the International Monetary

Fund? And that's where we're seeing the emergence in the global south of a new movement of sovereignty

against globalist institutions such as the International Monetary Fund, the Bank for International

Settlements, the World Bank, and so on. And if people in the West understood this, they would

support it. But what they're told is that you have a bunch of brutal military guys who are

kicking out the civilized French influence from West Africa. And of course, what is that civilized

influence? And this is where we get to the question you were just asking, Rich, which is what's

in it for the British? They have run these counterinsurgency operations to discredit a sovereignty

movement. And that includes arming and training groups like ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram.

If you talk to people who are involved in mobilizing in those countries against the

Western influence, they'll tell you about finding Mossad and MPI six agents embedded in their

country. And of course, in the countries we're talking about now in West Africa, the French

intelligence did the same thing. They're in there basically threatening to destroy the country in

order to maintain their control. And the story does not get told in any way. We're not allowed to

hear it because of the Western media is controlled by the same cartels that run the diamond and the

oil and the uranium and the gold business. So we're up against a very nasty enemy,

but it's losing. And the global south, because of the BRICS, largely, especially China and Russia,

are giving new confidence to leaders such as the ones we're seeing emerge in these three nations.

So it's a moment of great danger, but one of great potential for the future.

Could I come in there? Yes, please.

On the point of Harley saying that they're losing, very recently, as in the last couple of days,

two very high level key M23 RDF generals have been shot. M23 RDF does the Jacobin forces,

empires Jacobin mob, the terrorist organization that masquerades is the Tootsie community protectors

when in fact they are actually Rwandan forces in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.

So two of them have recently been killed by drone strikes, William Gorma, General William Gorma,

and General very high up guy, General Sultani. So that's fantastic news. Also RSC.

PD, just on place. So M23 are proxies for empire, stirring up conflict in Rwanda Congo,

and they've been killed by drone strikes, by Russian drones, Chinese drones. American.

So this is really interesting. So and also RSCF, high level RSCF guy has been killed by a drone strike.

So this is all happening now. Rwandan security. Oh, I'm so sorry. RSCF is in Sudan. So we have the

horrendous war that's happening now in South Sudan, which is actually a continuation of the war

that's been going on for the last three decades, if not longer. But RSCF are the aggressors

in the war and one of their top guys has been shot. By the way, they now have 10 million

internally displaced people in, I mean, I know. But the grand strategists must be so pleased

because that is the objective. You see, that's the objective to have this body of internally

displaced people because you can then use it as a pawn. You use IDPs as a pawn.

Then anyway, going back to the factors. So the Americans have been killing these imperialist

proxies. But when America is the big hegemon, the big bully, big bad bully, imperial power of all.

Well, this is what the Trump administration is doing. And if you think going back to the assassination

of Sulimani in Iran and the Trump Trump's first presidency, the capability to do that,

to target specific people, high level of people, it's always existed. But now they're using it,

they do it through the phones. So they target the cell phone. So now they are using it as they

should always have done by taking out these key M23 and RSCF generals. They are

sorely diminishing the power of those terrorist groups.

I'm sorry, hold on a second. So then what you're saying is that the US military

under Trump are taking actions against the imperialist forces, the European imperialist forces.

Which is exactly what they are doing in Nigeria. Very recently, as in the last few days,

a Congressional paper, Riley Moore, a Congressional paper about Nigeria and the Trump

administration's involvement. So they've re-designated Nigeria as a country of particular concern.

And they have now worked with Tinebus government and America are going to be working

at eradicating the jihadist networks within the country as well as supporting Christian communities

who have been under attack. The whole thing, you know, the masquerade of Tinebus government

and also of Bahari, the Prime Minister, the President before him, the masquerade of secular democracy,

okay, in Nigeria. Because the actual fact what they've been doing is a slow creep of

Islamification of the entire country. And coming back to the British, do you remember

Trump's missile strike in Sukkota province, a Christmas day? Well, Sukkota province.

Is it when he said, he attacked Boko Haram, he said they're killing Christians?

Yes, yes, going back to that. So the British protected an extremely violent caliphate in Sukkota.

Going back to 1804, they have preserved that element of a very violent caliphate.

And that is why, because I never understood, and it was the first interview I think I did with you,

and I never understood why they targeted Sukkota, but now I do. That was an article by

an American entrepreneur and philanthropist, Mike Arnold, and that's on his website.

And also on mine, the article is called the Islamification of Nigeria. It's not a theory,

it's a blueprint. And he says that because you have the slow creep of extremist Islam

becoming the blueprint of new government. So the Trump administration is now tackling that

hit on very, very interesting times. Yes. And then what that, so this is really interesting,

that the notion of the United States acting against European imperialist proxies,

and the United States acting as an anti-imperialist power here. I mean, certainly it's in all the

time that I've been active in my adult life. This is interesting and different from what I know.

And then for people who don't know that, and I learnt this from you, PD, is that by stoking up

these conflicts, what the European elites are doing, they keep nation states weak.

So that the central government has to use its resources for maintaining security

versus developing its own nation for its people. And that makes it easier for multinational

corporations, this instability to come in and extract resources. And in such, to do it in such

a way that the local people are kept poor and the local environment is destroyed because there's

no strong central government to keep them in check so that their extraction benefits the local people.

Now they can just enrich themselves and leave that part of the world polluted and engoverished.

It's a very old tactic. And I think Harley was mentioning before we came on live,

Harley was mentioning Frank Kitson. So who's Frank Kitson?

If I may just add to what you just said, but it's important for it just to realize that

there's not an Islamification because the imperial powers love Islam.

It's they see it as a tool that can be used to destroy the potential for sovereignty.

The idea that the British elite want to have Islam spread to the world, it's like using a disease

to weed out their population. And that's the way they look at it. Or using a novel medical

intervention to weed out a population who benefits from it. It's British petroleum.

It's the raw material companies that are trying to maintain their monopoly.

And they see these nations as a threat to that. Now Kitson is very interesting in this because

it shows you something about the view of man that is typified by these imperial types.

I'll just read a quote from his book. He wrote a book called Gang Counter Gang

about his experience fighting the Mao Mao and Kenya. And of course in Europe, the image of the

Mao Mao were wild, savage terrorists who were burning churches and raping nuns and so on.

The reality is that Kitson created a countergang called the Mao Mao that was doing these kinds

of atrocities to discredit the revolutionary organization that was fighting against colonialism.

And in his book, he writes about how you run these operations. And if I can find this quote,

it's okay, here's what he said. He said that if the fish referring to the terrorists

has got to be destroyed, don't try to do it by rod and net. It might be necessary to kill the

fish by polluting the water. And he referred to the pro-national insurgents as wild animals.

And he said, the soldiers saw it as though they were hunting wild beasts.

That's in his book called Gang Counter Gang. And he writes that the establishment of the

military reaction force, or what he called low-intensity operations, was more effective than

sending in large numbers of troops because you turn the native population against the so-called

revolutionaries. That's what this is all about. And so when you target Nigeria and Ghana,

you're also targeting the potential in those countries of the anti-colonial forces there,

because there's been a fight in these countries for a long time. Ghana and Krumah was one of the

people that PD was referring to who was an admirer of John Kennedy. And you had this American

system reaction in the 1950s and 60s. And it started before Kennedy. In an ironic sense,

it was the Roosevelt carryover, which to some extent was there with Eisenhower, not fully.

But then with Kennedy coming in, in the 50s, Kennedy gave speeches in the Senate against French

colonialism and Vietnam and in Algeria, and made it clear that if he were president, he would

be changing that. And so you had these forces that were encouraged in Africa to stand up and fight.

And what the British did was they ran these low-intensity operations to make it seem as though

these national revolutionaries were just terrorists, were wild animals. And so it was okay to

kill them in large numbers. That's the legacy of Kitson. And Kitson, by the way, was the aid

the camp of Queen Elizabeth II from 1982 to 1985 when he was running these operations when he

wrote his book. And so it was not some renegade soldier. He was at the center of British anti-colonial

suppressing the anti-colonial movement. And that's what the legacy today that you see in

the French West African countries to use them by their old name, they're fighting to stamp out

that legacy by doing what? Terrorism? No. By doing the American system to build their economies

for the benefit not only of their nation, but for the surrounding nations. And that's why the

French are still running dirty tricks against them. And I must say on this question of the United

States, there's a fight in the United States over this because on the one hand, what Trump is

doing is looking toward a future outside of this. But you still have people in the CIA and the

intelligence community who are deeply invested in training groups like Boko Haram, ISIS and Al-Qaeda,

who are still in there. And this has to be a public fight in the United States. And I don't think

President Trump will win it unless he goes public with what he's trying to do. The person who he

used in his first administration was Michael Flynn, who was the one who exposed the US

intelligence and the British intelligence aid in creating ISIS and Al-Qaeda.

Yes, which is probably explained why the Russia-Gate coup was so hell-bent on getting rid of

Michael Flynn and why he was targeted because he was the first victim. He was the first victim. He

had all the he knew where all the receipts were. Now, when you said about Kitsa and what they're doing

in what they did in Kenya and what they've done elsewhere, I'm reminded of Operation Gladio,

which is a massive operation. I only know a little bit about it where how MI6, the CIA and Italian

intelligence services, carried out acts of terrorism within Italy, killing Italian people and blaming

on Italian communists in order to discredit the Italian communists. So then I can, of course,

if they're willing to kill their own like that, they got no compunction against doing that to

people in African lands in order to steal their gold. I mean, who wouldn't want some gold

on their cheap? Well, Rich, after their operations in Kenya,

Kitsen became in charge of the Northern Ireland theater and did the same thing in Northern Ireland.

So it's not simply a question of racism. It's a question of imperial power. And that's something

that I think is important. And what the Operation Gladio targeted left and right, the idea was that

you come up with these phony distinctions. And, you know, if you look at it, one of the targets,

one of the last targets of that was Aldo Moro, who was the Christian Democratic Prime Minister of Italy,

who was kidnapped by supposedly the branch of the Red Brigades, held for 50 something days and then

killed. What was Moro trying to do? He was trying to build a national consensus, which included

left and right to build the nation. And that's what they targeted. They murdered them. And

Gladio was run out of NATO, going back to Alan Dulles and the US Operation to relocate top

Nazi officials inside Western European intelligence communities and in the United States.

Wow. Thank you, Harley. Harley, you and I should do like a video together, like several days long,

so that all the stuff that's in your brain can be extracted and shared with people,

so we're all better informed. All what people can do is go check out Harley's videos on the

Root Organization and have the links to that in the description below. I want to go back to Nigeria.

And also your articles on African Agenda.net had the links to that in the description below.

So what is happening? What what a Bocahara and whichever group it is in Ghana? What are they

actively doing on the ground? There's no group in Ghana. Ghana fulfills a different role. But what you

have is Nigeria since 2015 when Bocahara were eradicated all of that. Okay. So I think we spoke

about that in the first interview I did with you. When you had a security company called STEPK

and clear the area size of Belgium from Bocahara. You then had the Christian, Christian,

Goodluck, Jonathan, replaced by Mohammadu Bahari and Muslim. And since his time, Bocahara is

Islamic states of West African province, the entire jihadist movement has grown exponentially

since 2015. So the resurgence of anti-government forces Bocahara has gone off the charts.

So that's been Nigeria's role to incubate jihadist terrorism. Remember that the links to the

imams who are preaching the Wahhabi form of Islam goes back to Manchester in London and the

mosques and the British prison service where apparently you are most likely to be radicalised as

if you go to a prison or anywhere in Britain because the UAE have recently come out and said that

they won't be allowing any students to study in Britain for fear of them returning home radicalised.

So the links are very very strong there. That's Nigeria's role. The Nigeria is used. They were on

the point of invading Niger after the coup and a semi-guator. Oh sorry, Chiani in 2023,

they were used by Iqavas, the economic bloc, economic community of West African states. That's

what it stands for. And they used Nigeria to invade. They were on the point of invading Niger,

which neighbours them, when that was exposed by Nigerian journalist David Andean.

So that's Nigeria's role. Ghana's role is a long time. It's a very stable country, Ghana,

always has been the middle income country. Many good things were happening under Nanoko for Ado

and previously it's that you had in Kwamei Prumas. It has a great history but also

from a British colony, both countries. Ghana has had the lead in UN counter-terrorism in West Africa

for a number of years. They've always had that role. Very important because as that Nigerian

Prime Minister was talking about at the UN General Assembly that speech I was mentioning previously.

He said that those bodies, those UN bodies, the French presence, the UN presence, are how

the West got a foothold in the Sahel. And by that he means how they incubate, how they

harm, how they finance, how they fund the jihadist forces. So there you have it. So

Ghana's role is that it is the lead in counter-terrorism. So it's being paid and that'll be a very

handsome amount of money for many years now. And they've recently had a consignment of tech

computers, software, you name it, from the EU. Now that is to monitor counter-terrorism

in the Gulf of Guinea. Well we know that you just reverse that to give the full meaning of it.

Yes. Can I just say something quickly on that?

What you're looking at here in terms of the face of imperialism is not just military

and counter-insurgency. The face of imperialism in Africa is Tony Blair. Blair has something

called the Tony Blair initiative, which was recently given 350 million pounds by Larry Ellison

of Oracle. The EU took over a TikTok, a radical Zionist, and Ellison gave Blair the money

to run an operation against the economic policies of these emerging states. In other words,

he talks about sustainable development. You don't need technology. You don't need infrastructure.

All you need is a little bit of money to hand out to the peasants to keep them happy.

And this is the other side of the Commonwealth, Queen Elizabeth, and Blair. And what I find very

fascinating is that we're now getting to the heart of disrupting this inside Great Britain

with the Epstein scandal, Lord Peter Mandelson, who is one of Blair's key operatives.

And Blair is running all over the world to try and escape from what's going on with this.

So we're beginning to see karma turning against them.

Yes. And so if you have the emergence of young leaders, and Africa is a young continent

with a great deal of potential because of that, young leaders combined with the fight to overthrow

this corrupt degenerate oligarchy out of the city of London. And people have to get an image.

The face of that oligarchy is Tony Blair, who has been masquerading as a mild mannered

supporter of peace and so on. He got his chops supporting every single war, colonial war,

that modern Great Britain has been involved in going back to Yugoslavia.

So I think this is why it's so potential now. And it has to be made clear.

My problem with the Trump administration is that you can't do this as a kind of hidden game

of 60 chess. You really have to come out and openly attack it. And that means going after

renegade, the British role in renegade against Trump means going against the networks in the U.S.

military and establishment that still look to Chatham House and MI6 as their leading ally.

And that gets us right to the point that PD was making that the U.S. shifted from being an

enforcer of imperial policy to potentially the role that we played at the time of the American

Revolution of supporting emerging governments that are opposed to these imperial powers.

Holly. Holly so eloquently said absolutely wonderful. Thank you so much. And people should

check out Holly's work and PD's work. And of course it's really, really simple. Here's a really

good rule of thumb. If Tony Blair is for this, well, I'm over here. That's really great rule of

thumb of simple political analysis. Really appreciate it. And I know Holly you've done some really

great work recently on with regards to the Epstein files. And some people should check that out.

Please like, subscribe, comment, spread the word, share this video. And let us know what you think.

What have you learned from this video? And between now when I see you next, this is Rich at PD

and Holly signing out. All the best. Bye. Bye.