The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 1757 - Everything In Society Has Been Feminized, And It’s Been A Total Disaster. Here’s Proof.

American farmers and ranchers have been feeding our families for generations through droughts,

recessions, and wars. Celebrate America, turning 250 by supporting the hardworking Americans,

keeping our nation fed and healthy. Get 100% American Meat Delivered to your door at GoodRanchers.com.

Take it from me. Good Ranchers hits the mark every time. They're easy, tasty, and reliable.

Use good wire for an additional $25 off your first order. That's wire for $25 off when you

subscribe. GoodRanchers.com American Meat Delivered. Here's something you probably don't realize about

how Hollywood works. I know I wasn't familiar with it, but it turns out that for some of the

biggest franchises in the industry, studios often sign, use it or lose it agreements. And what this

means is that they buy the rights to a franchise for a certain number of years. But if they fail to

make any progress towards making a film after a while, then they run the risk of losing the rights

entirely. So studios can't buy the rights to a major franchise and then take a long time figuring

out what kind of movie they're going to make. They're under pressure to produce content quickly.

For Spider-Man, for example, Sony committed to begin production on new films within three years

and nine months of their last release. And they must get into theaters within five years and nine

months of their last release. This has been standard in the industry for a long time. The very first

film adaptation of the Hobbit, a lot of people don't realize, was made in 1967. And the film was

just 12 minutes long and was produced in less than a month. And we'll put it up on the screen so you

can see the quality of the animation or lack thereof. It's really just a few drawings that the camera

zooms in on. The only reason for the film's existence was to allow the producer to keep the license

to Lord of the Ring so that he could sell it back to the Tolkien estate for a $100,000 profit. So

he scrambled to put together this atrocious production where the one ring doesn't even do anything and

the animation doesn't animate in order to hold on to the rights. More recently, New Line Cinema

acquired the rights to the film adaptations of the Lord of the Rings and it cost them a lot more

than $100,000. But the same general rule applies to New Line Cinema. New Line is compelled to pump out

new Lord of the Ring content or else they'll lose the deal. Doesn't matter how bad or pointless the

content may be, they're contractually forced to have something in motion. And that's why in 2024

something called the Lord of the Rings, the War of the Roharim was released. And you've probably

never heard of this film. Apparently it was some kind of anime, which as you know is my favorite. And

as you can see from this poster, the protagonist was a woman, the fiercely independent daughter of

the legendary King of Rohan. For obvious reasons, nobody watched this film. No one liked it. It wasn't

actually based on anything in the books. They took a no name character from a footnote in an appendix

of Return of the King and made her the protagonist. And they were to script, script very quickly too.

According to Variety, quote, the animated film was developed in Fast Track to ensure that New Line

Cinema didn't lose the film adaptation rights for Tolkien's novels while Jackson and the teams

behind the Lord of the Rings and Hobbit trilogies were working on two new live action films for

2026 and beyond. The first of those live action films has been titled The Hunt for Gollum,

and it's slated to come out next year. Everyone already knows it will be horrible because it has

no reason to exist. There's a reason that Tolkien didn't devote much time to this particular series

of events in the books. Just not that interesting. It's also a prequel with No Stakes because we all

know how the story turns out. We know that Gollum is captured and gets away and then the next movie

happens. But they have to make The Hunt for Gollum or I'll still lose the movie rights. They're

contractually obligated to pump this garbage out. They can't take 10 years and come up with a

better, more compelling, more interesting film. They got to produce it right now. And then once

they're done with this one, they need to have a follow up in the pipeline. So the pace is relentless

by design. And here's the key point. While the studios would prefer that the movies do well,

that's actually a secondary objective. Their primary goal is to simply get a movie out any movie

so that they can hold on to the rights for as long as possible. And the so-called creative team,

the writers and executives understand this mandate very well. They know that

what executives are desperate for film. It's extremely easy to inject obvious lazy feminist propaganda

into an established story. It's exactly what's happening now to the Lord of the Rings. It was

evident in that atrocious anime film that nobody watched. It was evident in the Amazon atrocity,

the series that they put out. It's especially evident in the New Lord of the Rings film

that's going to be written primarily by Stephen Colbert and his Nepo baby son, which

already gives the game away. Colbert's only relevant experience for this gig is that he destroyed

late-night television, which used to be a major part of American culture. And precisely because

of that recent experience, not in spite of it, Colbert has been brought on board to obliterate

the relevance of the Lord of the Rings, one of the great landmarks in Western literature. Watch.

I was just explaining to the folks about the next talking movie after Hunter Gollum and the fact

that we've partnered up with you to develop the script. So yeah, I'm pretty happy about it.

Should I tell people what the story is? As much as you want, yep, yep. I will.

As much as I can, you know, what the books mean to me and what your films mean to me.

But the thing I found myself reading over and over again were the six chapters early on in the

fellowship that y'all never developed into the first movie back in the day. It's basically

the chapter is three as company through fog on the barrow downs. And I thought, oh wait,

maybe that could be its own story that could fit into the larger story. Could we make something

that was completely faithful to the books while also being completely faithful to the movies

that you guys had already made? And I started talking it over with my son, Peter, who's also a

screenwriter. And we worked out what we thought would work, especially as a framing device for

that story. And it took me a few years to scrape my courage into a pile to give you a call.

But about two years ago, I did. You liked it enough to talk to me about it. And ever since then,

the two of us have been working with the brilliant Philip of Boyens on how to develop this story.

So we're supposed to trust this whole project because Colbert is allegedly a super fan of the books.

He's really keen on all the little details of the canon. One of the problems here,

aside from the fact that Colbert can't even write one-liners on late night, much less a whole screenplay,

is that Colbert claims to be a Catholic, but he doesn't take any of those canonical teachings

seriously at all. He's pro-abortion, pro-gender insanity, openly mocks Catholics all the time.

So you probably shouldn't hold your breath if you think Stephen Colbert of all people

is going to take any text seriously, even if he claims to be a fan of it.

But even if you trust Stephen Colbert for some reason, and even if you don't know anything about

the Lord of the Rings at all, think about what he just said for a second. He's saying that there

are six chapters in the fellowship of the ring, which, quote, could be its own story, which could

fit into the larger story. That's exactly what these chapters already are. There are six chapters

in a larger story. They aren't a story all by themselves. And those six chapters are so

unimportant relative to the rest of the book that they were mostly, but not entirely dropped

from the Peter Jackson films. There was no Tom Bombadill in the films, for example, but now we're

supposed to believe that these six chapters are actually a self-contained story that justifies

an entirely new film. So how would that work exactly? What's the framing device that Stephen

Colbert is talking about? Well, if you pull up the log line for this doomed project, here's what

you'll find. Quote, 14 years after the passing of Frodo, Sam Marion Pippen set out to retrace

the first steps of their adventure. Meanwhile, Sam's daughter Eleanor has discovered a long buried

secret and has determined on cover why the War of the Rings was very nearly lost before it even

began. So translating that, we can assume that just like the anime, just like the Amazon

Ring of Power series that nobody likes, this is going to be at another piece of feminist propaganda

designed to destroy one of the most unapologetically male dominated stories in Western literature.

That's really what's going on here. They're going to have Sam's daughter go off and

do some sort of investigation to find out why the war was lost before.

Like, who in cares? Why does that matter? We already know how the war is going to end. So

heard doing some sort of investigation into its origins. It's like, I can't think of a less

compelling framing for a story than that. But the whole point is to take this female character and

put her at the center of it, have her go save the world or something, telling a story through

flashbacks. These people know that Lord of the Rings had almost no female characters at all.

And in fact, it's something of a meme that there's like, there are so few female characters that

there's only, and I think in all the chilligies, there's only one scene where two female characters

interact with each other and it lasts about two seconds. Now, modern Hollywood sees that as a sin

that must be rectified. Their intent on feminizing the franchise and injecting female characters into

it. They've decided that Tolkien's almost exclusively male story about male heroism

must be retold through a feminist lens. So effectively, this is like feminist reparations. And if

it bombs, they don't care when or lose as long as they put something in theaters, they get to hold

on to the rights for a little while longer. I've been with Pure Talk for a long time now and it's

always been important that the companies I work with share my values. Thankfully, Pure Talk is one

of them. They're veteran led, which means helping veterans is one of their main interests,

a main missions, plus they've donated over half a million dollars to America's warrior partnership,

a fantastic organization on the front lines of preventing veteran suicide. And Pure Talk's

creating American jobs with a U.S. only workforce. It might be cheaper to send jobs overseas,

like other companies do, but they are committed to delivering the best experience possible for their

customers. They give you the same tower, same network, same 5G coverage as one of the big guys,

but for a fraction of the price. So go to puretalk.com slash walls to switch to Pure Talk.

It's puretalk.com slash walls to switch to my wireless company and America's wireless company,

Pure Talk. Before we talk about Equips prime bars before, but now I'm also really liking their prime

protein too. Men's health called it the cleanest protein on the market. Starting today, my listeners

will receive an exclusive discount on prime protein, which has become our team's favorite clean

protein. The stuff is really delicious without any of the junk and toxins that fills a lot of the

powders on the shelves. Equip keeps it simple, real food ingredients with your choice of clean,

sweeteners. Each serving has 20 grams of grass fed beef protein, no way, no seed oils, no junk.

Plus every batch is a third party tested for heavy metals, plastic pesticides, mold, you name it.

When they claim to be the cleanest protein bar out there, they can actually prove it. And they

have great flavor options. So adding it to your daily routine, drinks, baking, anything really

is simple. Chocolate, vanilla, strawberry, even chocolate mint and cinnamon roll, tried them all,

and they're all great. So you can't go wrong. It's time to clean up your protein powder. Go to

equipsfoods.com slash matwalsh. Use code matwalsh. Check out to get 25% off prime protein purchases

or 40% off your first subscription order for a limited time. That's EQIP foods.com slash matwalsh

and use code matwalsh at checkout. Now at this point, you might think, well, so what? Hollywood's

been terrible for a long time. No one cares about mainstream movies anymore, especially young people.

Well, first of all, to the extent that that's true, it's still a major victory for the left. They

exist to demoralize as many Americans as possible. But more importantly, this is not simply a

Hollywood project. What's happening to the Lord of the Rings is emblematic of a much broader trend,

which amounts to the deliberate coordinated mass feminization of American culture.

Everything has to be feminized now. Men cannot have their own spaces to use the lingo.

Men are denigrated and discriminated against as a matter of policy. At the same time, women,

as well as a masculated man who claimed to be women, are elevated and promoted every opportunity.

You know, there's no better illustration of this phenomenon than what's happened to the boy scouts.

Of course, there's been a lot of commentary about this, but it just perfectly illustrates what

we're talking about. And as we know, the boy scouts are gone now. As of 2025, the boy scouts have

rebranded as scouting America after several years of accepting girls and homosexuals. Yes,

they were accepting girls into the boy scouts, supposedly as a way to boost membership. Meanwhile,

the girl scouts still exist. And according to their website, as of today, they don't allow boys

to join. So girls have a gender-specific scouting organization to join, and boys don't.

That's the way it works everywhere now. Watch.

For more than a century at the boy scouts of America, the organization has changed its name to

scouting America. Officials say the new name will reflect all the changes they've made over

the last few years to be more inclusive for girls and the LGBTQ community. They started allowing

gay youth in 2013 and girls in 2016. Today, the organization has over 1 million scouts,

more than 176,000 of those scouts are female. When we changed our program five years ago to allow

girls, we've now had thousands of women earn the rank of Eagle Scout. So I think there's a

pride point. We're happy to continue preparing young people for a lifetime of

character and citizenship in our great country.

The name change will not go into effect until February, marking 115 years of the organization.

I got my Eagle Scout in 2021, so I've been an Eagle Scout for three years now.

I've had a lot of trouble in the past explaining to people that I'm not exactly part of the

Girl Scouts program. Scouting America sounds a lot more inclusive of all of the other people that

are in scouting. The argument that I make with the people that say, well, I always like Boy Scouts

of America or BSA, why do we have to change? Membership is at historic lows. Part of my job is to reduce

all the barriers I possibly can for people to accept this as an organization and to join.

Having it nationally recognized that girls are being welcomed and included in scouting allows

to be a more safe space just in general. But I think it's also important that scouts everywhere feel

like the national scouting community is accepting them. So he says the reason they accept girls

into the Boy Scouts is that membership was too low, which is really a remarkable statement.

It's like a goat farmer who says, I don't have enough goats on my property time to bring in some wolves

so that I get my numbers up. Actually, if membership is low, the solution is not to destroy the

organization, nor is the solution to promote gay scouts and hold LGBTQ struggle sessions or whatever.

The solution is to build an organization in which parents, not random pedophiles,

organize outdoor activities that are actually interesting to young men. If you're having trouble

attracting young men to your organization, then work on making the organization more appealing to

young men and feminizing it and bringing girls in will have the opposite effect.

So you follow the trajectory here. First there was Boy Scouts and then we were told,

well, girls need to have a thing too. So then they made Girl Scouts and then the women said,

well, yeah, but that's not fair. We also want to do the Boy Scouts also. And then men said,

okay, well, can we go to Girl Scouts? Nope. We want to have our own thing and we want to have your

thing, but you can't have your own thing. That's the way it goes. Now, it's quite possible to

Democrats, if Boy Scouts did decide to only be for boys, it's possible that Democrats would

sue over that since every good idea is a civil rights violation, but it would have been worth a try.

Instead, they simply eliminated the Boy Scouts entirely while the Girl Scouts continue to exist

without any problems. Now, one of the reasons this is happening is that even with the rise of

gender insanity, most people outside of states like Washington and California can agree that

it's important for girls to have their own private spaces. When males invade a female space,

it clearly makes girls less safe. It robs them of opportunities. That's just a matter of basic

biological reality. A male and a female's locker room poses a much greater threat than a female

and a male's locker room. So you don't need to affirm any unpopular ideas or commit any

transgressions against feminism to make that point. At this point, most people are willing to make

that point. They're willing to say that, no, we shouldn't have these men in these female spaces.

But the argument for keeping women out of male spaces is more dangerous, because the point

there isn't that men are made less safe or that the women will outcompete them, because that

won't happen. The point is, first, that men are more suited for many of these roles, many of

these roles in these institutions that are typically male dominated. The reason they're male

dominated is that men are typically more suited for those roles, generally better at them.

If you did an honest survey of the 10,000 people in the world most suited to be astronauts or

military generals, all 10,000 would be men, and we all know that. And second, when you wedge

women into an institution, you destroy the male fraternal camaraderie in that institution.

Women are inevitably scandalized by how men relate to one another, and so their inclusion means

that everybody now has to start acting like chicks, basically. We saw this play out with the

various female defectors from the MAGA movement, people like Ashley St. Clair,

getting a lot of attention to the media right now, a lot of think pieces and profiles about the

women who are part of the MAGA movement are now swearing it off. And you know, these women,

what happened is a very similar situation. They showed up to a heavily male space,

immediately got their feelings hurt, because men are acting and speaking like men,

and then went crying about it, and demanding that changes are made to better accommodate them.

So that's why people are less eager to make the case for male-only spaces, because it requires

you to be more honest than most people are prepared to be. In fact, even in the girls'

scout, the girls' scouts, they're not being entirely honest about the position. They have an

obvious problem to confront. The left now defines a girl as anyone who claims to be a girl,

so how exactly do the girls' scouts prevent a male pervert from saying that he's a girl

from, you know, so that he could take advantage of the situation? Well, it turns out that

dilemma came up two years ago, and here's how they handled it.

The girls' scouts criticized on social media for offering gender-inclusive options for their

sleep away accounts, meaning girls can opt out from having a trans in their tent. I think

they've got that right, but they're walking it back on them. I would say the national girl scouts

is, they're different from the local girl scout organizations, and a local council sent parents

a camp form asking what is your child, what is your girl's preferred pronoun, and how do you

feel about sleeping arrangements? And this is what Girl Scouts USA answered. We're committed to

creating a safe, welcoming, supportive environment where all members are empowered to be themselves

as they discover their strength, etc., etc., but they ended it with this. Accommodations for

transgender youth are made with the local girl scout council to best support each troop and member.

So Girl Scouts are from kindergarten through 12th grade. Some of these girls might have identity

issues. Girl Scouts USA not taking a stand in my opinion and saying it's up to the local chapter.

Walking away from the issue, making no decision. Yeah, it's up to the locals.

It's up to the locals saying the book. And quite honestly, up to the local's parents,

because the parents are signing those forms. So notice what's happening here. The Girl Scouts

know that they can't have boys inside the girl's spaces, but they also know that if they say that

out loud, they'll get bankrupted by lawsuits from trans activists. So instead they make you read

between the lines. And they leave the decision up to individual chapters and parents, which is to say

they don't make a decision at all. They're hoping that fathers will be enough of a deterrent, which

may or may not be the case. The point is, this is how convoluted and backwards our institutions

have become. They're more feminized than ever, even as the words boy and girl have lost all

meaning to the left. The more powerful the gender industry becomes, the more universally feminine

our culture becomes. And unequivocally, that's a bad thing. So we'll start with the data on some

of the institutions that have been feminized in this country, because this is a universal problem

western society. Apparently getting a decent night's sleep now requires adding 100 useless

things to your bed. Well, you need the right pillow, the right gadget, the right app to track how

poorly you're sleeping. It's all very scientific, very exhausting. And guess what? You probably don't

need any of it. All you need is a solid pair of sheets and bedding, but you don't always realize

how bad your box store sheets have gotten until you finally replaced them. That's why you need

to upgrade to our sponsor, Bull and Branch. If your sheets are pilling, thinning, slipping off the

mattress or making you overheat at night, that's your sign. Bull and Branch's signature sheets are

made from 100% organic cotton. And they're actually designed to hold their shapes, stay breathable,

and feel luxuriously soft night after night. You fall asleep faster, stay comfortable all night long,

and notice the difference in the moment you get into bed. My wife and I have had their signature

sheets on our bed for a while now, and they're worth it. I was skeptical of the idea that they

get softer with every wash, but time has proved me wrong. They really are phenomenal quality and

comfort combined. Plus, you don't wear out instantly like box store sheets do. Upgradously,

during Bull and Branch's annual spring event, take off 20% sight wide, plus free shipping at

Bull and Branch.com slash Walsh with CodeWalsh. That's Bull and Branch B-O-L-L-A-N-D branch.com slash

Walsh. CodeWalsh, to unlock 20% off, exclusions apply C-Site for details. When you prioritize your

health, you're investing in your ability to show up fully, think clearly and stay resilient

through whatever life throws your way. Take charge of your health with our sponsor,

Armoroclostrum, Armoroclostrum, taps into nature's original superfood packed with over 400

bioactive nutrients that strengthen your gut and boost your immune system from the inside out

unlike probiotics that only address one piece of the puzzle. Colostrum strengthens your entire

gut wall system, easing bloating and supporting healthy digestion. The result is a stronger immune

system, healthier metabolism and noticeable improvements in your hair and skin. It's the secret

elite athletes have relied on for years to boost performance and speed up recovery. We've worked

out a special offer for my audience, received 30% off your first subscription order. Go to armora.com slash

Walsh or enter Walsh to get 30% off your first subscription order. That's armra.com slash Walsh.

Women now substantially outnumber men in both medical schools and law schools.

It was never the case prior to 2019 and 2016 respectively. These are two professions with very

demanding hours. They kind of make it very difficult to raise a family. There's an obvious premium

on logic over emotion and yet because of systemic discrimination against men, women are now

dominating these fields. The same is true of pharmacy, dentistry, optometry, veterinary medicine,

psychology, all of which, all of which were male dominated in the 1960s and 70s and all of which

are now overwhelmingly controlled by women. In all of these cases, this did not happen naturally.

It was an engineered change. It was a top-down change. It was people saying these institutions

must have more women and so we are going to force them in whether they are suited for it or not.

Something like 75% of psychologists are women now. When in the 1970s, it was closer to 20 to 30%

and so people also wonder why men don't go to therapy or don't go see psychologists. I think

there's a lot of reasons why they don't. But one of them is a man's not going to sit down and tell

us feelings to a woman. He's not going to sit down and consult a woman for a woman can't relate

to what he's going through. Now outside of these fields, which are mostly medical in nature,

the trend continues. 62% of the writers on streaming shows are women, according to a study from

San Diego State University and what comes to casting women typically play the characters who are

highly moral and competent while the white men are dysfunctional terrorists. This is just a

one of about a million examples from a recent BBC show. Like I said, there's a million examples,

but it's just one of them. Watch. Go ahead. Mom, it looks like Whitlock got hold of those home

office documents via freedom of information requests. You made a total of nine requests during

his time in prison. Nine freedom of information requests. It sounds like Whitlock had it in for the

home office. He accused the government of covering up the true stats on undocumented migrants.

First of all, it's something of an obsession for the land. Whitlock's fortune account, mom,

deactivated last month. Because sending you the posts that got him kicked off the platform.

History books say the last land invasion of England was 1066. Natural facts. The last land

invasion of England was yesterday morning at 945 when a boat carrying faulty undocumented male

migrants landed in Dungeon S Kent. That's 4040, fighting age illegal male migrants.

Our land invasion is an act of war. In war, civilians are allowed to fight back.

We're supposed to fight back. At the next time, a boatload of fighting age males lands on our shores.

We'll be ready. Turn the car around.

Nine freedom of information requests. My God. And then there's the part where he gets banned on

4chan for posting a selfie video, which makes no sense for at least three reasons. One, no one

posts selfie videos on 4chan. Two, no one has an account on 4chan that can get banned in the first

place. And three, even if 4chan did ban accounts for posting selfie videos, they definitely wouldn't

ban someone for criticizing foreign migration to Europe. That's about as tame as it gets. But

for the women who write this show and produce it and star in it, none of these issues matter.

Now what's important is that the white guy is a terrorist because he wants access to government

data on the number of murderers that's foreign invaders are committed. Let's continue because

streaming is just one example of this phenomenon. According to the Bureau of Labor, statistics,

66% of PR specialists are women. So we've come a very long way from the Mad Men era to put it

mildly. Union management gigs transformed into so-called human resources department, which as we

all know are controlled almost entirely by women. Even a profession like accounting and auditing,

which you'd expect to be male dominated because it involves numbers. And men are in general

better dealing with numbers is now 59% female, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Actually, if you have the time, I'd encourage you to pull up the Labor Statistics website yourself

to see how stark this transformation really is. Women are the majority in so many of these

fields of majority of management professionals. They're the majority of business and financial

operations specialists, judges, librarians, paralegals, medical scientists, arts, design,

entertainment, sports, and media occupations, healthcare practitioners, insurance sales,

school bus drivers, mental health counselors, claims, adjusters, quality assurance specialists

in computer software, advertising and promotions managers, a budget analyst, insurance

underwriters, social workers, post-secondary teachers, and every other kind of teacher, interior

designers, event planners, credit counselors, alone officers, business managers, so on and so on.

Half a century ago, most of these fields looked very, very different.

And in response, you might say, well, that's what progress looks like.

Now that women are in charge, everything's better.

But that would be a lie because everything is not better. Quite the contrary, I would challenge

you to name one institution anywhere in existence that has gotten better, more effective,

more efficient, more productive, as it has become more forcibly feminized.

Out of all those professions, I just listed, have any of them improved in the past few decades

to your knowledge? Do you think advertising is better now, for example? Do you think

Don Draper could learn some lessons from the women who permanently demolished the image of cracker

barrel and bud lights? What about the insurance industry or therapy? Have there been any breakthroughs

there, aside from the coordinated effort to diagnose every child with some form of mental illness,

so they could be given drugs for the rest of their lives? Now how about judges? Are they doing a

better job now? Unless you're a fan of criminals who repeatedly get out of jail, including criminals

who literally murder children while they sleep, which we saw in the Ronald Exantist case, for example,

and you'd be hard pressed to praise the changes in the judicial branch in this country, so

what has gotten better? Exactly. Space travel certainly hasn't. Astronauts were 100% male in 1969

when they were doing stuff like landing on the moon. And today, every graduating class at NASA

is roughly 50% female, and NASA basically hasn't done anything in 20 years. It's supposedly

they're going to start doing things again. They're going to supposedly launch a mission to the

moon next week. I hope they do. But things have slowed down considerably as the institution has

gotten more forcibly feminized. So if you can think of anything I'm missing, let me know,

and I'm not being sarcastic. But the more that we see women being forced into positions

in order to fit these feminization quotas, the more important this question becomes.

Has it made anything better? Anything. Consider what just happened over at the so-called

Church of England. This is a Protestant church that long ago decided to promote LGBT clergy,

female clergy, gay marriage, and all the rest of it. So it's not really a real church.

But for nearly two years, the role of the Archbishop of Canterbury, the highest-ranking cleric of

the Church of England, has been vacant. And no one's really cared. The Protestants in England

managed to make themselves totally irrelevant by disregarding scripture, embracing every trendy

tentative leftism to the point that they just left the role of Archbishop vacant. And it wasn't a

big deal. The tens of millions of baptized members of the Church really weren't bothered by it. But

the other day, at long last, a new Archbishop was named, and for the first time ever, appropriately

enough, and predictably enough, the Archbishop is a woman. The Church of England is now officially

led on a day-to-day basis by a pro-borsion pro-opin-borders-leftist feminist woman with absolutely zero regard

for scripture. Watch! I solemnly commit myself before you to the service of the Church of England,

the Anglican Communion, and the whole Church of Christ throughout the world.

But together, we may proclaim the Gospel of Christ, who reconciles us to God and breaks down

the walls that divide us. Let us greet our newly-installed Archbishop.

Well, she's happy, so that's good. It's one of the great tricks of the modern laugh that they

demand and receive thunderous applause as they degrade everything they touch. These are people who

insist on inclusivity that goes in only one direction, inclusivity that disenfranchises men and

elevates incompetence on the basis of gender or race. Now, it's no great mystery how this happens,

but simply there's no one standing in their way. There's no resistance at all. The conservatives

in the United States will rush to protect female-only spaces, spaces which is appropriate and necessary,

in most cases. They'll condemn the we-spot incident where a man tries to force his way into a woman's

locker room, but at the same time, for all of their bravery in protecting women's spaces,

very few conservatives have done anything to protect male-only spaces.

They've done nothing. They don't even talk about it. They haven't announced plans or funding

for a new Boy Scout program. They haven't brought massive lawsuits against schools and

employers that discriminate against men in the same way that they've sued schools and employers

that discriminate against whites and Asians. I mean, they're not even talking about this problem.

It starts with that. Talking about the force feminization of every single institution in the

Western world. Not talking about it. You know, it's maybe the single most overlooked and neglected

issue in all of American culture and politics. And that's hard to believe that, you know, it's an accident.

Men, including young men, need more opportunities to participate in their shared interest

beyond social media and video games and politics. And this country used to offer plenty of

those opportunities. And although you aren't supposed to say it, we were a much more cohesive,

efficient, and competent country as a result. I'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching.

Thanks for listening. Talk to you on Monday of the Great Day. Godspeed.

I do believe that if people have committed treason against the United States of America,

their statues should not be in the capital. History is written by the victors. And since the 1960s,

we've been told mostly by people whose ancestors didn't even live here during the war,

the South committed treason. But if the Confederates were traitors,

then why was Jefferson Davis never put on trial for treason?

What were Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson afraid?

Did they know something? They're not allowed to say today.

It's time for the truth. So here it is. Robert E. Lee was a military genius and a man of immense

honor who was beloved by Americans from the north and south for a century after the war.

This is the real history of the Civil War.

Take the next 12 seconds to unwind and enjoy relaxing music.

This ad break was brought to you by Wix because we know running a business can be stressful,

creating a website shouldn't be. Learn more at wix.com slash harmony.