This Week's Immigration Update w/ Allen Orr

This is Play, Kane Extended, an extended version of my radio show on Series XM Urban View

channel 1, 2, 6, which airs Monday through Friday from 12 p.m. to 3 p.m.

Here are my boy.

He is the former president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

He is also an attorney and he is also not a shot day fan and thinks that $400,000

is a middle class.

How are you doing, brother?

I'm doing good.

I'm doing good.

Happy Monday.

Happy Easter Monday.

Hey, yes, yes.

Alan, give us your immigration update.

Sure.

So I'm going to sort of go out and get some of this.

A couple of things to watch.

Then we'll talk about first.

The Supreme Court on the 20th is going to hear a case about whether when a green card

returns to the United States that they could be denied entry and put in removal because

they were charged with the crime, not actually adjuditated to a crime.

So that's on the 20th.

And then on the last day of the business month, they're going to hear about TPS again,

which is that temporary protective status for a class of 300,000 Haitians and whether

what the president did was racist and against the equal protection clause by ending their

TPS status, not with regards to their home country conditions.

This morning or yesterday evening, the president posted a picture of the moral of American

with Somalia walking around in America with some song about how the world is going down

because these Somalis are there.

So once again, you see this footprint of this racist overtone about what type of immigrants

do and don't belong, which sort of takes us back to what happened at the Supreme Court

last week on Pam Bondy's last day, which she came in for a half day because I guess she

was fired by the end of the day to hear this birthright citizen case.

And that question in the birthright citizen case from the government was with regards

to this birth tourism.

And they gave this number that 300,000 children are born in the United States of people here

either tourists, undocumented or on some other visa category.

And so what they didn't talk about when they talked about this other visa category, those

are people who are on long-term visas.

They could be here for 10 to 15 years.

In many cases, a woman's whole birthing period after graduating from college here could

be spent in the United States because she's waiting to apply for the green card or she's

working here naturally.

So the concept that they would not be able to have a baby and that they would be a United

States citizen, that class is not that big.

And 300,000 is a very small number out of three million babies that are birthed in the

United States every year.

And even with that birthright that we have, our numbers are still declining.

So once again, this concept is about the type of immigrant babies and who they want to

be American and not American because it's not a real problem.

But most importantly, it was not discussed during the case.

It has not been discussed on the news is that in 2020, our government passed a rule with

regards to people who are coming to the United States who are perceived to be pregnant and

turning them around.

So therefore, there is no reason for them to have this case before the Supreme Court

because one, Trump has said the board is closed.

So there's no more undocumented immigrants coming in.

In addition, there's already a rule with regards to people coming to the United States.

And so this morning or either last night, he also posted something saying, I hope the

Supreme Court gets this right.

And from the civics perspective, what people should remember is the Supreme Court's job

is not to write the law.

It is to interpret the rules as they are written, either in the plain language or in the

way that they've been done for the last 100 years, which we can see.

But if somebody wants to write a new rule or to change the way our constitution works

is to Congress.

And the issue that the president knows and the White House knows and the press secretary

and they're all saying, hope the court gets it right, hope the court gets it right is

that if they want to change something, they should go through Congress to get it changed.

And so that's the main format that we're sort of working on right now.

And then Mullins has taken this position on.

He has not in front of the camera.

You haven't seen him doing anywhere.

You've seen him roll back with regards to the FEMA checks.

He's not requiring that any check of $100,000 be signed.

He's rolled back with this new Bring Your Life detention centers, all these private contracts

that were written on these fraudulent contracts that Secretary Nomey, he's reviewing all

of them to make sure that they're not friends of Lewandowski and whatnot.

So that's hopeful at least.

We're not sure who is going to replace Bondy at this point and what their position will

be on immigration.

And if they will even be confirmed at any point in time.

So the new acting may be in there for 200 days, which means there'll be no change with

regards to immigration enforcement.

And we should still be on our peace and peace, expecting people to remove and deport

it, but in different ways, actually, out of immigration appointments, at job site

enforcement, are just traveling down the street.

So those are the data I have for you.

Thank you for listening to Clay Kane Extended.

If you want to hear more, tune into my show on Series XM Urban View, Channel 1226 from

12 p.m. to 3 p.m.

You know the deal, y'all.

I never really gone.