Tim Miller, JVL and Katie Couric on Iran, Airport Lines, CBS and More

Well, some fools, men of the J. O's all here from the WWE.

When it's just me between matches, it's day one itch.

That means it's Chumba time.

With hundreds of Casino style games and new titles arriving weekly,

there's always something fresh to try at Chumba Casino.

The daily booze make it even more fun and have me

about to get them all during my downtime.

Ready for a fun way to chill out and enjoy a few minutes for yourself?

Let's Chumba!

No purchase necessary.

VGW Group Void were prohibited by law, CTs and Cs.

21 Plus, sponsored by Chumba Casino.

Hey, I'm Josh Spiegel, host of the podcast, Lunatic in the Newsroom.

If you enjoy journalism that drifts into mild panic,

wild overthinking and a guaranteed nervous breakdown,

Lunatic in the newsroom is for you.

It's news like you've never heard before.

The only newsroom with a panic button.

You'll laugh, you'll cry, and gasp and horror

as the show spirals completely out of control.

It's not just news, it's emotionally unstable.

Lunatic in the newsroom, listen today.

We're live, we did it.

What's happening?

We're just green and chatting and laughing.

We were telling some secrets.

Hey, everybody, welcome to the book.

We're bringing Katie Kirk back.

We don't have any professional hosts on this damn YouTube channel.

And so we're all trying to learn.

And so we're like, let's bring Katie Kirk in to show us how.

Watch and learn, let's watch.

Here we go.

Or together for the next hour and Katie,

I'm handing the baton to you.

Well, thank you, Tim and JBL.

Hi, everyone, you know, this is my favorite day of the week

because I get to pick these two big brains next to me

and talk about kind of what's going on in the world

and try to make sense of it.

I saw a CNN segment was like, make sense.

Please make sense of it or something like that.

And I thought, make it make sense with the title of it.

And so we're going to try to make it make sense

and talk about sort of a whole bunch of different things

that have been going on.

And one is the way that Donald Trump you all

is really prosecuting this war in Iran.

Apparently he is being given video briefings

along the lines of this one.

Take a look.

I am Admiral Brad Cooper, Commander of U.S. Central Command.

He with my fifth update on Operation Epic Fury.

We're in the fourth week of the campaign

and remain on plan or ahead of plan

in achieving very clear military objectives

for eliminating Iran's ability to project power

in meaningful ways outside its borders.

U.S. forces have struck more than 10,000 military targets.

In fact, we hit the 10,000th Iranian target just hours ago.

And if you combine what we've accomplished

with the success of our Israeli ally,

together we have struck thousands more.

Well documented that our president doesn't care

to read intelligence briefings

because I think he finds them boring.

But how much of a handle JBL do you think

that the president has on what is actually happening

in this war and who do you think he's really listening to?

I mean, my guess is he's listening to beat Secretary of War

and little Marco.

I got to be honest, this was better than I expected

the video to be.

I thought it would be with intercut

with NFL tackling and cut scenes from Grand Theft Auto

and lots of thumping club music background.

Yeah, like this was actually almost substantive.

I feel like they could upgrade it a little bit.

It was a little boring.

I went to, they should bring back

old celebrity apprentice characters.

Like Havos, Arsenio Horosa.

I'll be doing it.

Pendulette.

I miss the we, I personally miss the we videos myself.

I thought they were much more entertaining.

But the question is who, you know,

yes, you think that Marco Rubio perhaps

and Pete Hegseth, but do you think he's still not listening

to people who are telling him things

are not going swimmingly in Iran

and what has happened that they have massively

underestimated the Iranian response,

the closing of the Strait of Hormuz,

all the missiles and these cluster bombs

and these drones that are hitting Israel.

You guys know the scoop and what's happening

in the inner circle.

Who is he not listening to?

Who is he listening to?

There's one thing that we know that he's listening to.

I don't know who it is.

I don't know if it's stuff sure it's got Bessent

or one of his finance buddies that he called,

you know, he does just answer the phone

when people call.

But he's at least in tune with the damages

is doing to the market.

I like that's one thing that we know.

I mean, we know there's just,

you don't have to know the inside scoop,

you can just watch his behavior, right?

Like it's like the market closes on Friday,

all of a sudden it's bellicose Trump,

you know, the next most Saturday morning,

it's like we're going to obliterate Iran,

Iran's going to go off the map,

we're going to, you know,

bomb all the oil infrastructure,

they're not going to be able to turn on the lights.

And then Monday, like literally

50 hour, 15 minutes before the market opens,

like, you know, we're going to do a five-day

we're going to show.

And the whole team is on CNBC.

I mean, Doug Bergham was on CNBC yesterday

spinning the war unclear

what the Secretary of the Interior's role is

in the Iran war, but, you know,

they had a full court press

and to manage the, you know, financial media.

And it's working.

It's maybe the only thing in the war

that's working so far.

They have managed this.

I had Joe Wyzenthal from Bloomberg on the show

on earlier this week, times the five-circle Monday.

And he was like, you know,

the experts he talks to don't understand

why oil prices aren't higher.

Like don't understand why the market correction

hasn't been bigger.

Like they, and he was like,

honestly trying to grasp around for answers.

And the best answer he has is that people believe

that Trump's going to taco

and just pull the plug on this.

And so they're not pricing in

the potential long-term calculation here.

So that is the one thing that we know

is broken through to him.

We can just tell based on his behavior.

Is he getting bad news about the war

or the negotiations?

It's hard to know.

It's hard to believe that JD Vance is delivering in bad news.

Like who would be the one that would be delivering in bad news?

Maybe like these videos aren't.

These videos are talking about how we did our 10,000th bomb,

sir, you know, so like that's not it.

So maybe General Keynes.

I don't know.

What do you be getting bad news, though?

I mean, that's the thing, right, from, from a,

on the military level, everything is going great.

The problem is strategic.

And on that level, like he,

he really is in a box of his own making

and he can leave whenever he wants.

Now that's not really true.

Like he, for all sorts of complicated reasons.

Like for instance, he killed his counterparty

and negotiations.

It is going to be harder for him to leave than normal.

Like, you could just pause the Liberation Day tariffs

without asking anybody with this.

He has to come up with some sort of deal.

So I think he's getting himself acclimated

to figuring out how much he's going to have to give.

The 15 point deal that was released last night,

where it wasn't lead, it was leaked last night.

And we haven't seen the thing itself.

We've only seen reports from people

who are sources close to it.

But it's pretty favorable to Iran.

It gives Iran the big thing that they want.

It doesn't ask things of them

that they couldn't cheat their way around.

Anyway, it would remove snapback sanctions.

It would remove sanctions more broadly.

And that's not the deal that Iran's going to wind up taking anyway.

They're going to wind up with something better.

So this is the, the problem like, you know,

on the one hand, militarily, we're doing great.

Go America.

Raw, I want to get my eagle and my truck.

And Doug, man, I want some explosions.

It's like the scoreboard on the video game.

You know, it's like they've only taken out, you know,

four of our fortresses, but we've taken out 10,000 of theirs.

And so like that's, in that sense, it's going well.

But like, that feels to what end?

Well, it's going well, except for, as you mentioned, JBL,

strategically, we could still have that pesky,

straight-of-horn mousse, right?

That is really effing up oil prices globally.

And maybe not as high as we thought they'd go.

But still, I think he's in a, in a dither about that.

And so, you know, I'm just curious.

If you think these quote unquote negotiations

that are going to happen in Pakistan,

which I guess has been used as kind of a middle person country,

are actually going to take place.

JD Vance is actually going to go there.

Because every time I hear they're going to be negotiations.

And by the way, why JD Vance?

But every time I hear they're going to be negotiations.

And I hear Iran is saying, like, negotiations?

What negotiations?

We don't want to cease fire.

We don't want to participate in these negotiations.

We don't like the plan.

So what is it?

Do you think they're actually going to come to the table, you guys?

I mean, what is Iran's rush to come to the table right now?

You know, I think that is a realistic question, right?

I think that the more they demonstrate,

they can cause pain on us in the West,

the more deterrence they're showing for the future.

So at some level, you know, a leader will emerge there.

And we haven't even really heard from the eye at all.

The new eye at all of junior.

There are a lot of different factions inside of Iran, right?

So like when statements get put out that are like,

we haven't even talked to them.

It's like, who is the statement from, actually?

And like, does that burn?

You know, so there's a lot to unpack.

And you know, we didn't exactly send our best

over to start the negotiations with Trump's son-in-law

and then the real estate guy, Whitcock.

And so do they even know?

So I don't know.

I do think the funniest outcome of not predicting this,

but I think the funniest outcome would be for there

to be a Pakistan peace talks in Islamabad.

And for Trump to have to like back down

and basically give Iran what they want.

And then for the Pakistani negotiators

to get the Nobel Prize prize next year.

I think that would be the funniest outcome.

And so that's kind of what I'm rooting for.

Because I would like for us to stop the war.

As soon as possible.

Well, a lot of people, you know,

I interviewed Christiana Amanpour.

Am I echoey?

I sound so echoey all of a sudden, but maybe I'm not.

Anyway, I interviewed Christiana Amanpour earlier today.

She was in a car on route to some assignment.

And she said that one of the worst case scenarios

is if this negotiation works with this new

heart, you know, more hard line government

that basically it emboldens them

and allows them to be even more deeply entrenched in Iran.

And that they get a lot of things that they want.

And like they did after the Iran-a-Rock War,

they start to reconstitute both their conventional weapons

and their nuclear weapons.

So I mean, what was really gained by all this?

I think when all is said and done,

what was gained? Nothing, JBL?

Nothing.

So Amanpour is exactly right.

And the most likely outcome here is that we wind up

exiting this war and what is Iran-like?

Well, they navigated the succession crisis

that they were going to have eventually

when the 86-year-old Italian eventually died.

They got through that, the civilian dissident movement,

still shattered, right?

They killed tens of thousands of citizens

who were trying to put together a movement,

popular movement, overthrow the regime.

That's gone.

And they will have demonstrated that the strait,

closing the strait of hormones,

which was always a theoretical weapon,

is a viable strategic weapon,

kind of like a tactical nuclear device,

except easier to use and they can't take it away from you

and it really doesn't come with the political stigma

that using a nuke would.

And I mean, I just look at this and it just seems obvious to me

that the Iranian regime exits this in a stronger position

in terms of control internally.

You know, they have a lot of rubble.

They've lost a lot of munitions, et cetera.

But really, just in a stronger position

than they went into it.

And Aaron Friedberg sat and talked

with Bill Crystal about this last week.

And he noted something I didn't realize,

which is that after the 12-day war,

China was in rushing missile propellant

and all sorts of stuff over to the Iranians

to help them rearm and reconstitute.

And that will happen after this war too.

And so even, you know, even if you wind up

having hurt the Iranian military.

Pretty grating it, right?

Yeah, and degrading it, right.

That's going to get rebuilt very quickly.

And that's the nature also of asymmetric warfare

that Iran is doing.

They just need to pump out $35,000 drones.

So that's the caveat here.

I were going to get nothing out of this.

We can just say that.

I think that Israel had a more acute goal here

and mission and objective.

And I think when Trump, when the negotiating

at 15 point plan leaked, you also saw some leaks

from the Israel side saying that they're concerned about that.

Like they don't like that deal.

They don't want Trump to be brought to the table immediately, right?

So for Israel, at least in the short term,

you can understand from their domestic security perspective,

like degrading Iranians' missile capabilities

and their Navy, like matters, like actually matters,

and then degrading their finances

and their ability to fund proxies and all that, like that.

You know, leadership chaos has been good for Israel

because if you have a coordinated leadership in Iran,

they're going to be more effective at whatever,

funding, Hezbollah, Hamas, or whoever else

that they want to fund throughout the region

to go after Israel.

So you can understand their short term goal here

being kind of met from the Israel perspective.

I don't get their medium in long-term goal though.

I think that they're isolating a lot of American politicians

and a lot of Americans are becoming less wanting

to be aligned with Israel.

And I think that could have long-term magnifications.

And then to JVL's point, if that's true

that the next Iranian regime can reconstitute their weapons

with help from China, then they're kind of like back

to where they were before the war started.

Just with maybe some hurt feelings on the American side.

And so I think medium-term that would probably,

but you know, this is all moves down the chessboard

it's hard to see.

But like you do understand the short-term implication

for Israel, I guess is what I was saying.

Yeah, I mean, I think Tim, Israel's medium-term hope here

was for Iran to become a failed state.

Because Iran is a failed state

then they cannot fund Hezbollah and Hamas.

And so they wanted to do to Iran what they did to Gaza.

They wanted to make it uncomfortable

and destroy the entire leadership architecture.

And they don't care from their national interest.

What happens there afterwards?

They don't need change to a more democratic liberal regime.

That would be nice.

That would be great.

It's not necessary.

I'm not sure that's an hour national interest,

but that's okay.

That's a different question.

But we're not getting that anyway.

They weren't able to turn Iran into a failed state.

So unless Donald Trump gets his kind of man-card question

and we get into some sort of machismo escalation,

which is possible.

A lot of people keep betting on the fact

that Donald Trump is a coward at the end of the day.

He does not want to keep escalating here.

He's the bully on the playground that throws the first punch.

But then when he gets punched back,

goes crying to the teacher.

That's kind of how people are psychologically reading trouble.

I think that's probably right, but it's not a 0% chance

that he decides to go a more organized way.

Talk about macho escalation.

I mean, they are activating and deploying at least 1,000

and maybe up to 3,000 paratroopers

from the 82nd airborne, right?

So why the hell are we sending the 82nd airborne?

And does this mean there are going to be ground troops

in Iran proper?

Are they going to try to get a hold of what's left

of their nuclear weapons?

You know, what is the point at that?

Is it a show?

Is it pressure prior to these negotiations?

I can't figure it out.

David, I want your answer,

but did you see that big polymarket bet?

I sure did.

I thought it was, so it'll be the test

to see how much insider trading is really happening.

Yeah, I wanted to talk to you guys about that

about insider trading.

So here's what we can talk about both in the context

of this troop's ground troops question.

There was like a $2 million bet that said

there will not be troops in Iran

or a ceasefire I'm going from memory,

something like by March 31st, so a week from now.

But there will be troops before April 23rd or something.

Yeah, I'm going to be 30.

So it was basically so many of you made a big bet

that this is going to happen.

Very specific.

They were betting a middle, as we said,

sports gamblers might be familiar with.

You know, it's not going to be, you know,

we're not going to win by less than a touchdown

or more than three touchdowns.

It's going to be right in the middle.

It's a very specific bet.

You get better odds that way.

Is that somebody who just is on heater?

You know, some rich crypto guy taking a chance

or is that somebody that inside info?

I think we'll probably know in about a week or two.

Anyway, I don't know.

I mean, there's a lot of stuff.

Isn't there other stuff like that going on?

You all were people are making lots of money

through tips for their proximity to the administration.

And oh, hi, go ahead explain.

Would you like to talk about this right now?

Yes.

Let's go walking through the history of this.

On the Friday before the war starts,

150 accounts on polymarket, placed hundreds of bets,

predicting that the US would strike a ran by the next day.

Interesting.

On January 2nd, a trader had turned $32,000,

had bet $32,000 on the capture of Nicholas Maduro.

And it was announced the next morning

that we had captured Nicholas Maduro.

And so this is a thing which has happened

all through the Trump administration in April of last year.

All sorts of stock trades started popping up minutes

before Trump announced that the liberation day

terrorists were paused.

And on Monday, $580 million in oil futures

came pouring into the market 16 minutes before Trump said

that there's going to be a pause in Iranian power play.

The strikes they had promised on the Iranian power plants.

16 minutes.

Wow.

So like this is just a thing that's happening

that if you happen to work anywhere within either the Pentagon

or the White House and you have...

Aksa, you like see over the president's shoulder

while he's tweeting or something.

That can be worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

That could...

Could I just ask the other side of this?

Is it also possible?

Sometimes I like to go to the one of my big...

My Tim's Ockham Razor, Tim's Razor

is when in doubt weeped out house of cards.

You know, so like when you see something

and you're like, there's some machinations in play.

Maybe it's just idiocy.

And so I do wonder it's like...

Is it also possible that people just read Trump like a book?

And they're like, you know what?

The markets are about to open in an hour.

And I bet this guy is going to pop out of bleat.

You know, it's trying to call them down

and so I'm going to make a bet on the front end.

It's anyway, or some stupid person in the White House

tells somebody else, like I think that it's possible

that there's organized corruption happening.

It's also possible there's stupidity happening.

And we don't know because we don't have...

Like we don't investigate financial crimes

any more in this country or investigate public corruption.

Oh no.

No, why would we do that?

No.

Get back to the ground troops though, you guys.

What do you think their role is going to be?

Is it...

I really did wonder, you know, you get this deployment

from Fort Bragg.

You call in the 82nd Airborne.

If there's something, if there's theatrics at play here.

So Tim, do you want to go first or do you want me to?

Joe, go ahead.

Okay, so my gut on this is it's theatrics.

He would not be stupid enough to try to put boots on the ground.

What boots on the ground probably would mean

would be either he sends in some airborne

to take over Carg Island, which is a hub of Iranian export

infrastructure.

It'll be super easy.

This would not be a hard mission.

The problem is after you take Carg Island,

you're totally exposed.

There's very little cover.

It's hard to...

I mean, it's like 15 miles off the coast of Iran.

People can launch suicide drones from anywhere

up to 2,000 kilometers away, keeping the soldiers alive

on Carg Island after the fact that becomes a much tougher order.

And what would the goal be there, JBL, to do?

So the goal there would be to have some leverage

over the Iranians, because Carg Island sits on...

I forget how many millions of barrels

of reserve oil, which is like 80% of Iran's reserves.

And so pipelines come from the Iranian mainland onto Carg

and they have terminals where they then load super tankers

onto Carg.

So at that point, Trump could say,

hey, we'll mess this stuff up real good

if you don't come to the table with us.

So we'd be like having a hostage, right?

You have infrastructure to hold hostage.

Don't you think the nuclear site is more likely

for there to do troops on the ground?

Yeah, because so they say they need special forces, right?

Yeah, and to go into his phone, I mean,

that's a, that's a hell of an operation.

Going in to take out what is it?

440 kilos of 60% rich uranium.

I mean, all of a sudden now you're like in a GI Joe movie.

And I don't, I mean, I don't know.

I could have peeled that.

The, the chances of something going maybe...

Do you know, do you remember the GI Joe theme song?

Did you do it?

Of course I do, but I'm not going to sing it.

I don't know.

I don't know.

Damn, damn, damn, damn, damn.

Anyway, maybe Trump has that in his video that morning.

They play the GI Joe theme song.

I just remember when they put, when they put Barbie's voice

in GI Joe, remember, do you remember there

is the whole big controversy?

Yeah, I'll look it up, but keep talking.

No, so here's, but here's the, here's my thing.

So I, I don't think it makes sense for him

to use ground troops.

However, I would, I would just say, we have noticed

that when he moves military assets into a region,

he uses them.

He, you know, he did this before the June strikes, right?

He moved a bunch of assets over there.

He did it before Venezuela.

He did it with this.

He started moving assets already.

Where did he not do it?

Greenland, right?

He never actually moved anything towards Greenland.

He just talked and talked and talked about invading it

and then he chickened out.

So when he starts moving stuff around, he does tend to use it,

which suggests that maybe he's serious.

It's just one of the items.

Hold that thought, Tim, because I just want you to know,

in 1993, the activist group, Barbie Liberation Organization,

swapped the voice boxes of hundreds of talking GI Joe

and teen talk Barbie dolls, facing them back on store shelves.

As a result, Barbie dolls grow out, eat,

lead, copra and vengeance is mine.

While GI Joe's chirped, I love to shop with you

and let's plan our dream wedding.

I want to be sure.

And then on eBay, those things cost a fortune.

You know, this is a benefit of Trump.

This is a benefit of Trump.

What Barbie Liberation Organization?

Barbie Liberation Organization.

Is this benefit of having someone like me around

to remind you all of the things that happened

with Barbie and GI Joe in 1993?

I need a Barbie Liberation Organization t-shirt

as soon as possible.

If you are a viewer, please contact me.

I would like to wear one to the gay bar by Pride.

In June, I would like a Barbie Liberation Organization t-shirt.

My thought, which now sounds kind of boring,

compared to what you were talking about, was a Barbie of her own,

about a Barbie of her own Nancy Mates.

And Nancy Mates was in our armed services briefing today.

And see what you want about her?

She's not reserved.

She doesn't play her cards close to her chest.

Like, you know, she's out there, all right?

And she comes out of the meeting

and she's like, after what I've heard,

I'm just going to let you know,

I'm a no-one ground troops.

So I don't know what she heard in that meeting,

but to me, that sounds like somebody who's a little,

you know, a loose cannon.

You got breached on a possible ground troop mission

and was like, this is stupid,

and came out and popped off on it.

So does anybody listen to Nancy Mates?

Well, I just, one thing I always say during Trump 2.0 Katie

is it's like, you know, in men and black,

when you have to read the National Enquirer for the Real News,

you have to read the crazy people for the Real News

during Trump 2.0, because the crazy people know the Real News,

because they're crazy people in charge.

And so-

And they're the ones who are talking.

Yeah, the ones who are talking.

So Nancy, I just, the fact that she felt the need to send,

send that leads me to believe that somebody told her

about a possibility, you know, about what a possible option was

that sounded to her, not lies.

So just take up what it's worth.

I want to talk about, get back to the negotiations.

Look at how JVL just turned to beat red

when I said Nancy Mates' chest.

All I said was cards close to the vest.

No idea what you're talking about, phrasing.

I said cards close to the vest.

Maybe I should have said vest, cards close to the vest.

I want to talk about the timing of these negotiations, JBL,

to do have some really interesting insights

about why this might be a key window to make this happen.

Yeah, so I sort of went down the rabbit hole a little bit today

for the newsletter I write.

And there is a ticking clock aspect to the war.

I mean, it isn't like the damage isn't linear, you know,

it doesn't like increased by the same amount every day.

And we're coming up on a couple key moments,

one of which is the closing of the window

for the spring planting season.

That will hit around what would be day 45 of the war.

And we're in day 40 now, right?

Yeah, are we, is it day 40?

I think so. Don't ask me this.

Don't ask me to do this on live TV.

Yeah, I think so.

I think so.

I'm lost.

I don't even know what, yeah, it seems like it's both day 10

and day 100, so it's hard to say.

So once you go past that,

then all of the fertilizer shortages

and the increases in price and fertilizer

are sort of baked in to the coming harvest

because farmers have had to make decisions

and those decisions are made.

Doesn't matter what you do, right?

You can have a ceasefire, but it's not going to,

it's not going to change food prices.

Yeah.

The other thing is, right now the American stock market

is being propped up by a handful of AI companies.

If you sort of look at it, the percentage of the S&P,

which is run by AI now, it's like 40%

or something like, wow, it's enormous.

And we are now building data centers.

This is, I saw Bloomberg at this yesterday.

For the first time in American history,

building a data center construction

is outpacing office construction.

So we're building more data centers than offices.

So we got to keep doing that.

We got to keep building.

This is what the AI's need.

Most of those chips come from Taiwan.

Taiwan is heavily dependent on imported liquid natural gas.

Helium, what about the helium?

Did you get into the helium?

Also helium?

Yes.

Tools it.

I was on a helium deep dive.

We were on a deep dive.

After all, it's on down to helium rabbit hole.

But anyway, the financial times over the weekend

like, hey, guys, we think Taiwan might be

within 11 days of running out of liquid natural gas.

And if this happened, it would, I mean,

who knows what it does to the semiconductor sector?

If the semiconductor sector gets, you know,

fucked sideways, I'm sorry, excuse me, Katie.

So KJV, I'm pretty familiar.

Who knows what happens to the American stock market, right?

He's in these ripple effects.

Now, since then, Taiwan, the government in Taipei

has come out and said, no, no, no.

And their statement is very interesting.

They said we have secured access to liquid natural gas

that will get us through May.

That's a weird statement.

It's not like we have it.

It's saying what other people have promised us

we can get it.

Don't worry, guys, it'll all be okay.

Yeah.

And like, I don't know, just China have to bail them out,

if not, like what?

And so one of the weird things about this,

so Tim, this is, I think partly it answers why

the people you're talking to aren't,

you know, are a little freaked out

like why isn't oil more expensive?

So because in America, we're actually

in a pretty good position to ride out

most of the effects of this stuff

better than other people.

But that's the first order effects.

The second and third order effects of it,

things like, well, what happens

if the semiconductor industry goes bottom up?

That's where our vulnerabilities start coming out.

And...

Do you think the tech bros are breathing down his neck

and saying, hey, you do?

Yeah.

So you think he's hearing from Tim Cook

and all these other people and saying...

I think that Tim Cook is scared to say something mean to him.

But I think that the closer tech crowd is,

I would thank you on the side.

Sacks wasn't for this war anyway.

David Sacks is an all-in podcast guy.

I won't say the nickname I usually use

for him if Katie's turn around.

But anyway, he's on the inside of the White House.

He got a very awkward episode of his podcast

where he was trying to explain, you know,

I keep it, it was like, I'm not for this,

but I'm trying to make the best pitch for it.

So yeah, I assume those guys are.

It's not just them though, it's Ag Guys.

You know, I figured it was Catherine and Pelar Colleague

who's posting about this today is like, you know,

they're all kinds of stuff you just don't think about, right?

Like petroleum gasoline is in plastics, right?

We know it's in plastics.

Plastics is in packaging.

Right, what plastics is in packaging?

So if you're like a, if you're selling carrots, right,

at the store, like a bag of carrots,

it's like, well, the carrot prices aren't going up,

but like you had to put carrots on a truck

and the diesel prices are going up,

then the carrots have to go in a plastic bag

that, you know, so like there this,

the longer it goes on,

there's ripple effects in a bunch of different industries.

What about gas?

I mean, gas prices, obviously,

we talked about this before you guys,

but what's happening with gas prices

and you were saying JBL,

we could tolerate sort of some of these stresses

better than some countries,

but a lot of people are really hurting at the pump, right?

Yeah, and the inflationary pressure is real.

I think we're over $4 a gallon nationally as of this week.

That could be wrong.

Somebody could fact check me on that.

If we're not over it, we're right up against it.

And, you know, like if you go and talk to e-con nerds,

they will give you a, you know,

for every $10 the price of oil goes up,

you wind up getting, you know,

0.2% inflationary pressure or something like that.

That stuff's real, and again,

it's the second order effects.

It's cumulative, it is cumulative.

But so you then look at, okay.

So we are in a very weak job market right now.

This is Jerome Powell said this last week,

said we've had essentially zero job creation

for the first part of this Trump term.

We've had very low GDP growth.

And so these are things which normally make the Fed

want to cut rates to stimulate things.

Well, if you have gas prices going up

and inflationary pressure coming up

through the energy sector,

that means the Fed can't do what it wants to do, right?

I mean, the Fed, in a neutral environment would say,

yes, this is a moment to cut rates,

but now the Fed can't really do that,

or they can't cut them as much as they would like.

And so they're old.

And Trump is desperate to have them do, right?

Yes.

I have to do a correction.

And usually I wouldn't do this

because you can let stuff slide,

but it's only been 28 days of the war, not four days.

Oh, sorry.

Well, no, it's okay.

But why did I think 40, it feels like 40?

I know that Fed is JBL,

because we're in Lent.

And so you think that your Catholicness

would have, not having to do math,

you think you'd have realized

that we've had a full length.

Oh, yeah, I guess that's right.

We're not there.

We're not at our 40 days.

We haven't had Easter yet, yeah.

Why don't you give up for Lent and JBL?

Playing pinball.

It's killing me.

Really?

Give up in ball.

It's the hardest thing I've ever done.

You've got a new machine during Lent.

Yes, yes, that's right.

I have a new pinball machine behind me during Lent

that I can't play, and it is killing me.

Why the hell would you give that up?

I'm because I'm stupid.

I'm sorry.

I'm sorry.

All right, listen.

We're going to go back to chocolate next year,

or something like that.

Yeah, and I apologize,

because I was the proponent of the 40-day thing.

I was thinking of 40 days of something else, 40,

I don't know.

Before we moved to DHS and what's happening in TSA

and ICE at airports,

the Ipsis poll found that 93% of Democrats

and 63% of independence disapprove

of U.S. strikes on Iran.

77% of Republicans say they approve

of the U.S. military strikes against Iran.

So what do you think?

I mean, is it too early?

I know I always ask you guys about the midterms

because I am obsessed with what's going to happen.

But do you think this will resolve itself

in time for it not to have a huge impact?

I've never been this bearish on mega politically

in the entire time of, you know, since day one.

I don't know.

Well, since I was very wrong about Trump in 2016.

So maybe not since day one,

but since Trump won in 2016,

and I went on my vision quest to try to understand how I could

have misunderstood the country so badly,

I've been basically the one being like,

these guys are stronger than you realize

to most of people in my life.

And I don't, I think that the wheels are coming off.

I really do.

I could be wrong people can clip this in the future,

but I think that that's 77% number is low for Trump.

And I think that number is very low.

It's very low for Trump and I think it's soft

because people just back to the gas prices stuff,

people haven't really felt the pain yet.

Like, you know, if you're really,

if you're really tight on your budget,

that first tank of gas, that second tank of gas,

you're like, okay, whatever.

But the fifth time, you've got to pay that extra 20 bucks

at the pump, the seven times.

Look, it's a 25 bucks,

all the sudden your food prices are going up too.

You get into Biden 2022 territory.

I think that the bottom could come out.

I don't, and he will always have cult members.

They'll always be people that, you know,

it's not like zero people will be foreign.

They'll be a concerning number of people

foreign no matter what.

And many of those people will never be Democrats.

You know, he's not on ballot.

Yeah, he's not on the ballot.

He doesn't turn out all the way to this guy.

Yeah, people expect screw this guy.

I don't need to show up.

I'm just going to go, you know, get my tramp stamp

or whatever, you know, go shoot.

What?

I don't know, do whatever the mega voters

don't usually vote do on a random Tuesday.

And my tramp stamp, you know, recolored.

Yeah, you got to freshen it up.

Um, that's all I'm saying.

They're just going to do whatever it is.

It's like a game.

Can we play quick game?

Yeah, sure.

If we were going to bet the over under

on house pickups for Democrats,

one better off.

And I set, and I set the line at 53 seats under.

Would you take the over the under?

I would take the under two.

Under is that's a lot.

We're to polarize now for fit.

They're never going to be 58 seat.

53.

53 was, you know, the line.

All right, if you're setting the Vegas line on that,

I mean, I'm pulling up the clock right now.

And so they've got what I'm doing this math live on the fly.

They've got like 19, another 15.

So they've got probably 35.

And the lean D toss up lean are likely are category.

So that's that would be where I put the number 35s, 36, something like that.

Okay.

Still a lot.

I think they're going to get swamped.

Look, they, here's just, I did a longer video on this video watch.

We just, like, just for a shorthand,

that Mar-a-Lago district last night.

Right.

But I wanted to talk to you guys about those two races.

Yeah.

So there are two races in in Florida.

It's state legislature.

But the, the, the get all the one, um,

forgive me.

But the one.

Emily.

Um, yeah.

Yeah.

That's right.

Yeah.

Gregory, that's right.

Yeah.

Gregory.

She won by two points.

Trump won the district by 11.

So it's a 13 point swing.

Well, Trump won Florida by 13.

And so if you project that out to the whole state, I, in theory, Florida is back in play

for the Senate and governor's race.

Now, I think that that's going to be a stretch.

But let's say that they can get in the ballpark, like, let's say that they can force

Republicans out to spend money there and Florida to protect the governor's race and the

Senate race.

Florida has a big competitive since 2018.

And it'll be the first time, which is, which is not that long ago, but like eight years ago.

And then Florida wasn't even on the map this election.

Nobody even tried.

So Trump just, there was no race, you know, so I, I just think that's shorthand, right?

Like, if the Florida and Texas, right, that's going to cost the GOP a lot of money.

And what's going on with, what's going on with Cornyn and Paxton, by the way, you guys,

is, is anything changed?

I think Trump might have tackled on his Cornyn endorsement.

It's too late now for Paxton to get off the ballot.

Now, Trump could pressure Paxton and he could quit and his name still be on the ballot

and he would lose, right?

So it's not, you know, you could have a soft dropout, but like for the hard dropout,

like where there's no race at all, that's, that it's happening.

So I don't, you know, if you're Trump, I think it was a trial blow.

It was kind of like, okay, let me see if I can get away with this.

And then when there's pushback, it's, I don't know, you know, maybe he'll come back

around to it.

He's got others.

And then people make him videos for him about because when is that, when is that,

when is that runoff between Paxton and Cornyn?

Isn't that in May?

May there's something?

May.

Come on in May.

Yeah.

I don't know.

I'm bad with numbers so you guys don't listen to me.

But I do know that the, the DHS funding that it's, it's been 40 days, Democrats in the

Senate.

That's the 40 days, that's the 40 days, 40 days, either that or Noah's arc.

And they're holding the line, refusing to support that funding bill, right?

That it clues money for ICE unless there are changes in policies, right?

They have to wear, they can't wear masks.

They have to have judicial warrants to go into somebody's home.

They have to wear body cameras.

And Trump is now saying I'm not, I'm not going to negotiate, right?

What is this?

What's the latest on that?

And what about this reconciliation bill?

And you don't have to get too much in the weeds, but just tell me what, what's happening?

I think the short, the short of it is this was happening in the hell, which is that Republicans

and like Democrats basically came together behind the scenes and were like, hey, what can

we do to just resolve this TSA thing?

Because everybody's hearing complaints about it, they're hearing complaints about it, Delta

canceled their special line and their special phone number that they can call now.

If they're late for their Delta flight, for the members of Congress, like everybody's

sick of it.

Also people feel bad for the TSA agents, you know, who are getting, who are having to work

without getting paid?

And so essentially, yeah, a lot of them have laughed, shout out to New Orleans, there

is the city that had the most no-show, so people were like, you're not paying me, I'm

not showing up, New Orleans was number one, which I think speaks to the ethos of the city,

which I appreciated.

But anyway, so behind the scenes basically, John Thune and the Democrats got together

and were like, here's what's a deal that could work and the deal that came up with was

that we don't find ICE in this, we put ICE into a separate basket and we'll just push

through the finding on everything else.

Now that ran into a couple of problems, on the Democratic side some Democrats were upset

about it because they're like, we shouldn't CBP also be in the ice bucket, I don't want

to find the border patrol either, you know, so some Democrats were blocking at that.

And then I think on the Republican side, I don't, I can't tell exactly what it was, but

there were some complaints, like basically on the Republican side, they were like, screw

us.

Like one Republican said, we already gave them concessions by sending Tom Homan to Minnesota.

You know, why should we be conceding to them at all?

And so, you know, there was just some consternation on both sides and it's one of those things

where I think it probably would have worked out like some Democrats would have boycotted

some Republicans would have boycotted, but what it got done, what it got done, but then

Trump said, I'm not going to sign anything with the Democrats on board for.

And so now they're like, we're back to square one and there were some reports yesterday

that Katie Britt, who is the point person on this committee, Republican for Alabama,

was at the White House and I could seem like it was close to getting done, but then

some other Republican senators were like shit posting it and saying, like, ooh, the longer

this goes on, the deal could fall apart.

So it's tenuous.

And I think that if Trump just said, yeah, sure, I'll sign the original deal, they could

get to 60, but if, but short of that, I think we're still kind of in no man's land unless

Trump has a come to Jesus.

What is this TSA thing hurt you guys more, Republicans or Democrats or everybody?

Republicans, I think, I mean, if it doesn't hurt Republicans more, the Democrats just give

up.

I mean, Trump is in this massively unpopular war.

The economy is slowing down, unemployment's going up, gas prices are higher.

Even immigration, if you don't like the immigration stuff anymore, everything is going

the wrong way because of Trump's decisions, not because of like external factors and

like that.

And Democrats can't hang this on the guy too.

I'm like, I don't know, I don't like what are you guys even doing?

Meanwhile, he came up with this genius idea to put ICE agents in airports and apparently

he got this idea from Linda from Arizona.

Let's hear what Linda had to say because she gives great advice to the president apparently.

I think I have a solution to the TSA problem.

What we need to do is we need to supplement where we're missing out on TSA agents who can't

afford to work for us anymore.

We need to bring in ICE agents.

I'm going to say it's kind of a brilliant idea.

I had a caller on the show, the Clay and Buck's show today, Charlie.

Clay had an interesting idea.

What if President Trump announced that ICE agents were now going to be supplementing TSA

agents inside of all of the airports?

Oh, and we'll get to that true social post in a moment.

But thanks Linda from Arizona, but ICE agents are doing like nothing at airports.

Somebody on your team put together some getting photos.

This is what pretty much ICE agents are doing at airports all across the country.

Not much.

They're on their phone, they're scrolling Instagram, they're hanging out.

All the lines in the background.

Right.

What the hell is the point of ICE at airports?

We don't have the photo of the one guy looking over the lady's shoulder.

The actual TSA agent is working, getting no money, she's sitting there and something like

ICE could go and is looking over her shoulder, seeing how she's doing.

The only actual thing that they're doing is TSA agents, this is not their fault, so not

imputing them.

Do you have some dumb jobs among the many jobs that they have, including like sitting on

the stool there to make sure that nobody leaves the security area accidentally and goes

out into the regular area.

And so I think now that we have an ICE guy on that stool, we're paying double the amount

of money and they can sit there.

And if Uncle June starts wandering outside of the terminal and goes the wrong way, they

like, sir, can't come back through here or they could shoot him, or they could shoot

him.

Yeah, it could be no tackle him.

If he doesn't, if he doesn't obey a law for order, he could tackle him, happen right

there.

But on True Social Trump took the opportunity to give an out of boy and out of girl to

the ICE agents, he said, I'm so proud of our ICE patriots, they were unfairly maligned

by the lunatic Democrats for years.

And now at the airports, in addition to what they're supposed to be doing, they're helping

people with bags.

And picking up and cleaning areas, they were so proud to be there.

The fact is they shouldn't have to do this, but they are rehabbing a fake image given

to them by radical left Democrat politicians.

The public is loving ice.

So the Democrats unwittingly did us a favor.

They're great American patriots.

They just happen to have much larger and harder muscles than those.

Which is what you're supposed to have.

Thank you to ICE for the great job you are doing.

America very much appreciates it.

President.

I didn't write thank you for your attention to this matter.

President Donald J. Trump doesn't, doesn't seem like a great use, an efficient use of

taxpayer money to take these guys or getting $70,000 signing bonuses and our elite strike

forces and be like, please go hand out water.

And if you could help this person with their bags, that would be great.

And there might be some wrappers that got left by the bag.

It's all seven.

Would you mind going and picking those up for me, Donnie?

I'm just happy they aren't camped outside of a Keens and Yeras, you know, looking for somebody

to nab.

So there's a.

Well, they had a chance at you guys know, what do you think Stephen Miller thinks about

this?

Do you think Stephen Miller likes having resources diverted from the Keens and Yera stake

outs?

I have time to.

I don't make me get inside this.

I don't want to get inside this that either.

Meanwhile, they had a TSA you guys testified today and said it's going to take months to

bring back these agents and to train people again to make up for the people who have just

left TSA for good and said, take this job and shove it.

So we could be seeing this problem extend for several months, right?

And the gas prices will extend for several months.

I mean, you don't use a lot of fuel airplanes, you know, so if you have any summer vacation

plans, I know believe me, I've been buying my airline tickets.

I tried to get them ASAP.

No, it's all just a total shit show.

I wouldn't mind getting rid of the TSA in this moment.

We could just do that.

No.

Is that not a good idea?

I don't know.

I mean, does it?

I mean, does it?

No, it's a libertarian tin.

It's not the mine.

As somebody covered 911.

I kind of appreciate it.

When was that?

Yes, it is.

2001.

But still.

I mean, I'm the worst thing.

I mean, I'm the worst thing.

What would you replace it?

Well, do you want to go back to like 19th century, we just show up with here for temperatures

walks on.

We'll play.

I do.

I kind of want to replace it with the honor system, I think.

I'm not sure I can go there with you, but if you're saying I'd like to replace it with

a more secure but less security theater regime, maybe, but also the promise, the real answer

to like, oh, I want to get rid of that is the panopticon where everything is social credit

scores and stuff.

And I don't think I'm down to that.

A bunch of other have somebody like looking at the x-rays of me, walking through a thing,

then have the government doing retina scans.

I just want the mags.

Just let me go through the mags.

I don't understand.

I just have to think about how much money was spent.

They have the new system now where they put the bat, you put the bag into the machine and

then someone checks it, you know, back at headquarters and it's slower.

They took out all of the machines and replaced them with a new system that's now slower.

I can't.

Well, this is my old man's.

Okay.

You get off my yard.

I'm glad the TSA is there.

I agree.

There are a lot of jobs that are kind of useless, but I appreciate especially when the

chair of threat is high.

All right.

You guys are letting me, you're indulging me for the last few minutes of our little gathering

today to talk about colorectal cancer because it is the, now the number one cancer killer.

People under the age of 50 that just happened late last year earlier than the American Cancer

Society predicted it would.

And I want to just remind everyone that if they're 45 or over, they need to get their baseline

colonoscopy or colon cancer screening of their choice.

They can talk to their doctor about that.

colonoscopy being the gold standard, but there are other options as well.

And basically just remind you that I very bravely expose my colon because nothing says good

morning, like showing your insights on national television at 730, don't look that wasn't

on tape.

I know that.

No, I didn't say it was live.

Okay.

It wasn't tape.

It wasn't tape.

Okay.

In fact, we have a little clip of me back in the day.

I think it was in 2000.

So God, 26 years ago that I did this.

Not allowed to make a face.

I just have to, well, you just can't look disgusted because everyone has to look at the

colon.

Yeah.

I mean, it's a girl colon though.

You know, it's nothing about you, any girl colon I wouldn't really want to see.

Okay.

We'll have a boy colon.

I mean, they all kind of look the same.

And in fact, do you guys have my quick colonoscopy or did somebody grab it or not nervous?

Sure.

That normal.

No, no.

How do you feel?

I feel very lethargic.

I feel the way I feel right before I go.

We know that the medicine is taking effect because you're having a little trouble getting

out some of the award.

So we know it's sedated.

Yeah.

I've been charming while sedated.

I'm a pretty little colon.

There you go.

Anyway, as a shout out to me, 26 years ago, I just want to remind people seriously that

if you are 45 or over and if you have a family history, really important for you to talk

to your family members or get and or get genetic testing to see if you have any gene mutations

that put you at a higher risk.

If you have a family history, you need to be screened 10 years prior to the diagnosis

of your first line relative.

So my daughters, Jay, was diagnosed at 41.

They need to be diagnosed, I'm sorry, screened, hopefully they'll never be diagnosed at 31.

And so that's just a public service announcement from me, from yours truly.

And honestly, if one person listens to this and he or she calls their doctor and says,

I need to make an appointment to get screened.

And they find polyps that they remove or they find maybe an early stage colon cancer that

they can actually take care of.

Then my work here is done, gentlemen.

I hope so.

Also it really isn't bad at all.

I'm going to say one of the more pleasant medical not bad.

It's amazing.

Yeah.

The day of not having to eat before is a little tough.

It is.

And I got all the times in the bathroom.

It's fine.

It's manageable.

It's totally manageable.

The back end is great though, because a lot of people focus on the complaints.

I came out of my colonoscopy.

I have a family history.

So I got going a little early, not 45 yet.

Coming up fast.

But I, boy, coming out of there, I was just like finding that that profile is good shit.

Yeah.

I'm going to go to a rave.

I was like, what can we start with?

Best nap you'll ever have.

Yeah.

I had a good nap, but the post nap was a party for me.

So I recommend it.

Yeah.

I think it's worthwhile.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I'm trying to figure out how much to reveal here.

So I think I've made clear my like utter delight in getting to do this with you, Katie.

Because you have been a longtime journalism hero of mine, because, I mean, a, you're one

of the most important broadcast journalists of like the last 50 years.

But also because you used the shithand that life dealt you and your fame to do something

like really important and it made a difference in my life personally.

And so my, my father-in-law passed away a couple of years ago after a 10-year battle with

Colin Cancer.

And he is of that age.

So he's a little, he would have been a little older than you where, you know, when you went

on TV and did that, that was a moment.

Tim doesn't remember this because he was four years old or something.

But everybody in America talked about it and it normalized colonoscopies in a way that

they'd never had been.

And so guys, especially like older generation guys, were fun and like, oh, yeah, okay.

Well, I might as well, again, it's not weird to get something up your butt.

I'll go get that screening thing done.

And because he had that caught early, like my kids got like extra years with him that

they never would have gotten.

And he was, he was a baseball pitcher in college.

My oldest is going to pitch in college.

All those years that they got with him getting to go to my kids' games and the two of them

to like catch and talk baseball and stuff.

I mean, no shit, the whole time's long before I knew you, I, you, you know, I, I did think

to myself that one thing that Katie Kirk did made this sort of stuff possible.

So thank you.

Well, that's, that's the kind of story that honestly is like makes my heart sing because

I lost my husband when my girls were two and six.

And he missed so much, you know, he got so ripped off.

And every time there's a big milestone in their lives, you know, I'm a grandmother now.

He would have been, he would have turned 70 last January.

And it's just, it, it's heartbreaking.

And to hear that somebody actually took action, did something was proactive.

And was able to, I'm sorry that they didn't catch it even sooner, but was able to extend

his life and be able to be there for the people he loved and the people who loved him.

You know, and, you know, sometimes when I talk about this, I also try to guilt people

into it because to me, it's the ultimate selfless act to take care of your health.

And to take care of your health means you're taking care of other people and that you want

to be around for them.

So for everyone who is like embarrassed or it's a pain or the prep is, is annoying or

the prep is a pain and, you know, unpleasant, you know, it's, it's a lot better than being

diagnosed.

Believe me, because I watched it with stage four calling cancer.

And it is so curable.

It's one of those unique cancers, like it doesn't spread all over your body.

It's contained in your colon.

I, I described it to a gastroenterologist I was talking to.

It's like your colon's like a, a Jimmy Dean sausage, it's got this casing and it doesn't

penetrate.

I know, sorry, but it doesn't penetrate through the colon wall.

If it's caught early, it can be removed before the cancer becomes a real issue, before

it becomes, you know, travels in microscopic ways all over your body and then unfortunately

metastasizes to another organ.

So thank you for indulging me.

Thank you, JBL, for telling me that story.

It means a lot to me and, you know, we didn't want to end on such a, I don't know, it's

okay with me because, but on a, a sad note, but, you know, I did that colonoscopy 20, resulted

in a 20% increase in colon cancer screenings that the University of Michigan called the,

the Curric Effect, which was very flattering, but I've continued to try to preach to everyone.

I took Jimmy Kimmel to get a colonoscopy when he turned 50, Kim Kardashian turns 45 this

year.

I'm going to see if she'll let me take her to Kim.

Come on, Kim.

Wouldn't that be awesome if she did that?

And, but I did a funny thing with Ryan Reynolds production company and the colon cancer

reliance where I did a riff on Sidney Swini and her good genes commercial and we, we

do that out so you guys could watch.

Calm down.

Speaking of genes, did you know that the majority of people who developed colon cancer are

not genetically predisposed to the disease?

That's why doctors recommend F-145 in older get checked.

Mine are televised.

Katie Curric gets regular screenings and if you're 45 or older, you should too.

Thank you.

You're going to get Sidney out there.

Thank you.

I know.

I was thinking I should do so.

Well, she's like what, 23 or something, but anyway, I tried to, I tried to communicate

the message with the sense of humor and, but I'm deadly serious when it comes to this

cause.

So thank you for letting me talk about it because as I said, March is colorectal cancer

month, awareness month and it's March 25th and so this is going to be sort of my last

opportunity to do it, although we should be talking about it all year long.

Appreciate it.

So great.

Go do it.

I had last.

You, so and JBL, how about you?

Have you been screened?

Yeah.

Yeah.

I did it two years ago.

I did it when I hit 50 cause I had mine right before they moved the guideline back to 45.

So anybody listening, if you know somebody who's 45 or you know somebody who's older and

hasn't gotten screened or you know, sorry, I can't help but say this, you know, we're seeing

more and more cases of people in their early 40s, 30s and even 20s and they're trying

to figure out why.

So please be aware of symptoms, bloating, unexplained weight loss fatigue, blood in the toilet

bowl, change in bowel habits, anything that really doesn't feel right, talk to your

doctor about it because sadly, younger and younger people are being diagnosed with

this disease prior to the age of that recommended first baseline screening.

Okay.

My work here is done.

I love being with you guys.

You're so smart, so interesting and I always learned so much and I'll talk to you soon

I hope.

I can't wait.

Okay.

Thank you for everything Katie.

Bye everybody.

Bye.

Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing.

Victory Lane?

Yeah.

It's even better with Chamba by my side.

Race to ChambaCasino.com.

Let's Chamba.

Don't purchase necessary.

VTW Group.

Boy, we're prohibited by law.

CTNCs.

21 Plus.

Sponsored by ChambaCasino.

Hi, this is Alex Cantrowitz.

I'm the host of Big Technology podcast, a long time reporter and an on air contributor to

CNBC.

And if you're like me, you're trying to figure out how artificial intelligence is

changing the business world and our lives.

So each week on Big Technology, I bring on key actors from companies building AI tech

and outsiders trying to influence it.

Asking where this is all going.

They come from places like Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon and plenty more.

So if you want to be smart with your wallet, your career choices, and meetings with your

colleagues and at dinner parties, listen to Big Technology podcast or ever you get your

podcasts.

This life was all fun and games.

At ChambaCasino, it is.

Play hundreds of free social casino games.

No downloads needed.

Want the chance to redeem incredible prizes?

Why wait?

Play your way anytime.

Any plays.

Only at chambacasino.com.

No purchase necessary.

VTW Group.

Boy, we're prohibited by law.

21 Plus.

Terms and conditions apply.