WAR ROOM [1 of 3] Tuesday 3/31/26 • DAILY DISPATCH - News, Reports & Analysis • Infowars

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the war room. I'm your host Harrison Smith

coming to you live this Tuesday afternoon, the final day of March folks. We are now officially

one quarter of the way through the year 2026. So yeah, sorry, sorry to let you know about

the ever increasing speed of time passing. I don't know. Maybe I'm the only one. Yeah,

quarter of the way through the year already. And that to me is shocking. We have a lot of

news of course to cover. And I'm going to take a lot of your phone calls today. No guests.

So we will be taking your phone calls in the second half of the program. But let's begin

today as we do every day with our daily dispatch.

All right, here's folks, your daily dispatch for Tuesday, the 31st of March 2026. Double standard

Democrats get mural of arena, Zerutska removed despite liberal love of George Floyd. On Monday,

social media began to trend with the case of hypocritical liberals, getting a nearly complete mural

for murdered Ukrainian refugee arena, Sarutska in Rhode Island, taken down with many commenters

pointing out the left's love of George Floyd, the nearly complete mural of slain Ukrainian refugee,

arena, Zerutska in Providence is being removed after Jewish mayor Brett smiley called for it to be

taken down. The murder of the individual depicted in this mural was a devastating tragedy, but the

misguided isolating intent of those funding murals like this one across the country is divisive

and does not represent Providence said smiley. It's got she's white. I just want everybody to know,

doesn't matter if you're a refugee, doesn't matter if you're a Ukrainian, doesn't matter if you're

a liberal BLM supporter. Backed is your white, you're there for bad. This was a mural of a black

criminal, then there'd be no problem with it. I know because Providence, Rhode Island,

spent $38,000 spraying black lives matter on the street last year or the year before. So they're

not concerned about what's divisive and or not. They're concerned about uplifting white people.

So that's the central concern they have is making sure that white people, even if they're

totally innocent refugees fleeing from a war being stabbed and murdered in cold blood for no

reason by a black guy who after he murders her says got that white girl. It doesn't matter,

it doesn't matter. You're white, you're there for bad and your murder was a good thing. People

don't want to be reminded of it as if it's bad paint a picture of the murderer and they'll

celebrate it, okay? They're liberals. And of course, everyone involved is non-white. So

just just take that in, folks. Meanwhile, Christian athletes come to defensive NBA player,

fired for criticizing League's Pride Month events. We'll get back into this Jade and Ivy,

a former player for the NBA's Chicago Bulls was let go by the team on Monday. After he criticized

League's Pride Month celebrations as unrighteous, according to his Christian faith. Yes, folks,

you can be a wife, beater, you can be a rapist, you can be a statutory rapist, pedophile.

You will not be let go of your NBA team. However, if you're Christian, you better watch out, okay? And

that's actually what's going on here. We'll get back into that. United Nations Human Rights

Diplomat resigns, warns you in preparing for possible use of nuclear weapon against Iran,

United Nations Human Rights Diplomat Mohamed Safa resigned from his position on Sunday,

claiming the international organization may soon use a nuclear weapon in Iran.

While you and itself does not have nuclear weapons, members such as the US or Israel who are at

Warthoron could deploy nukes against the Middle East nation. We'll get back into this. There's a couple

potential options for them using nukes. And I'll break it all down on the other side.

Meanwhile, oil slides as Trump reportedly has told AIDS, he's now willing to end the war without

reopening war, which I decide it's funny. I don't know to me, that's something about that

is funny to me, that it's gone from these overarching, very ambitious goals for the Iran War of

totally retaking the country and installing a new regime to actually, we just want to get the

straight of Hormuz open, right? As of yesterday, the goals of the war were to mitigate the consequences

of the war. And now we're not even doing that. And now it's like, actually, we just lost. We

just lost completely. We started a fight, got knocked to the ground, got our face rubbed in the dirt,

and now we're going to go home. Good job, Trump. Get it.

While I'm going on, when it comes to the war in Iran, again, it's just every 12 hours,

the entire scope of the war changes dramatically. I don't think it ever

was intended to be anything other than what it is, a total disaster,

bagmire excuse for the New Old Order to implement it yet again, even greater and more stringent

lockdowns than they ever achieved under COVID. Remember, it's different this time. They don't

need your permission. They will just cut off the oil. And this is already being implemented

in various countries around the world with other countries, planning a massive

global lockdown, exactly like COVID. And it's so funny because I'll say something on next

yesterday about what's happened already in the Iran War and where it goes from here and just

the disastrous outcomes that are all but inevitable at this point. People are like, oh, you know,

you doomer, whatever, a black pillar, whatever. And it's like, I was thinking back and I was like,

well, last couple of times I've had a reticence like this. I've had like an anxious feeling

about the future like this. I think of a couple, you know, pretty prime examples. One of them

would have been like January, February, 2020, seeing the lockdowns of COVID, seeing the way things

were going in that regard and just going, okay, this is bad. It's not going to be two weeks.

They're locking us down fully. They're going to just try to destroy the economy. They're going to

keep people imprisoned in their houses until they come out the vaccine. And all of this is probably

in service of getting Trump out of office. And of course, 2020 was like the most disasters here

in American history. Then again, in like August of 2020, when we still hadn't gotten rid of the

lockdowns and people were still going, I can't go on much longer, can it? It's been a couple

months now. It'll probably let up soon. And I again made a prediction. Then I said, actually,

I think they're going to keep it locked down until election day. I think they're going to use

mail-in ballots to cheat. I think it's going to be so obvious that they cheated that people are

going to be enraged and pissed off and angry at this. And then they're going to use that anger

of the fact they stole the election to claim that saying the election was stolen is terrorism.

And they're going to try to use all of that anger that they generate to piss off Republicans

to get us to do something stupid so they can claim we're all domestic terrorists.

And then it just happened exactly like that. So I'm not a doom or all the time. I'm not always

predicting doom. It's just there are certain times when all of the components line up

and without a dramatic and universal change, it's inevitable. The disaster that we're going into.

So again, I'm not a doom star all the time. But when I do predict doom, I tend to be right.

So just take that into account. I want to go to a couple of videos here. Like I said,

obviously the major upshot of all of this is massive lockdowns across the globe. It's

going to clip number five here. Leaked reports. They're at an energy lockdowns within 21 days in

New Zealand and Australia. They're already having sanctions or rationing going on there.

But no, they already have a pre-planned global lockdown schedule that they are now announcing

quietly. Let's watch. Australia and New Zealand could see energy lockdowns within 21 days.

This is from two leaked reports. Well, one of them was leaked. One of them was published

today by each government. Both countries' governments are now modeling. They say they're

actively modeling. This is a declaration that has been made that they are modeling the worst-case

scenarios for the country, for the economy and for citizens. And we know what they mean when

they say measures they are talking about energy lockdowns. We'll cover Australia in the first part

of the video and then we'll cover New Zealand in the second part of the video. But let me tell you

the official name of the declaration from New Zealand. This is called the Fuel Response Plan

2026 overlay. And it's in response to measures that they put in place in 2024 for this worst-case

scenario. Now, when you read that report and when you actually look at some of the things they've

said, it's weird to me that they knew this was coming, have no refinery capabilities,

and yet they didn't do what the IEA said, which was to have an emergency stockpile of energy fuels.

If you're from New Zealand, drop a comment below how on earth has this happened? And if you

missed Wednesday's video, it's way too long to recap all of it here. But it was about these energy

lockdown scenarios that have been published by the IEA, and they've gone out to governments

all around the world who are now actively modeling and preparing for what they say are energy

lockdowns. And I want to quote from their official guidance. It says, and I quote here,

these energy lockdowns would be far more severe than anything we saw during the COVID lockdowns.

That's from the International Energy Agency who created this report, which is called sheltering

from oil shocks. And remember what they have recommended in their report. They have

recommended to governments around the world that lockdown measures go into place. And again,

I'm quoting directly from these reports. So there it is, the fuel response plan,

2026 in New Zealand, written in 2024, where they said, you know, here's what's going to happen

if been when there's a disruption for the flow of oil. Not a lot of instances that would result

in the restriction of the flow of oil to places like New Zealand, the straight of hormones,

one of the only ones. So is there looking forward in time from 2024? It seems like they

were aware in some regard of the fact that this would be happening. And they did nothing to

stock up. They did nothing to keep a reserve because it's on purpose because this is the design.

This is what they want. They wanted to stock up and have plenty of fuel for their citizens.

Then they wouldn't need to lock down. They could have done that. They knew what was coming.

They had the foresight, make the plan to ration everything. Why didn't they make the plan to

store up a bunch of fuel? Because it's on purpose, obviously. So this is coming. Now he said at

the very end there, way more significant lockdowns in anything we've ever seen before, anything

under COVID will pale in comparison to what we're about to see. They don't make these plans. They

don't make these moves and these pre-staging activities if they don't intend to follow through.

This is coming. It's going to arrive very shortly. They're going to lock down the world

on the basis of a lack of fuel that they have deliberately engineered.

How could this possibly be an accident? And again, just put everything into it, right?

This wouldn't even be an issue if they had their own refineries, if they stores their own

energy fuels. I mean, it's the same in every single white country in the world.

I was going to say European, New Zealand's not European. Australia's not European. They are white

traditionally, historically. Europe, of course, is exactly the same story. America, of course,

is exactly the same story. At least Trump has done some to free up energy, but obviously under Joe

Biden, they did things like shut down the, was it colonial pipeline? For absolutely no reason,

stopped new the Keystone pipeline from being built. They are deliberately cutting us off from

our energy sources so that they have an excuse to enslave us. It's, again, it's just not

complicated at all. UK sitting on one of the biggest oil natural gas reserves in the North Sea,

not tapping it. Sitting on practically endless coal reserves, not digging it up.

Germany systematically went through and eliminated all of its nuclear reactors.

I could have told you that was a bad idea. In fact, I think I did. It doesn't matter they did

it anyway. It wasn't just that. I mean, they destroyed everything. Here's a coal power plant

that they destroyed in Germany. No reason to. It was working fine. In fact, I believe this

coal power plant cost like billions and billions of dollars and it had been

built like three years before. I think it was like 23 billion dollars from I'm not mistaken.

And they just destroyed it. Why? Because Greta Thunberg was sad. I mean, the reasons they gave

you people to do this, it's just unbelievable people fell for this.

Hey, it's easy to destroy a hell of a lot more difficult to rebuild. So it's not being rebuilt.

So they're sourcing their energy from elsewhere. So the flow can be cut off and they can be rationed.

I just don't. I don't understand that this is what I don't get. It's like on every issue,

every issue has been divided in two sides. It almost seems arbitrary, like what side takes up

which position? Crazy. And that's, I'm trying to say this. That is exactly because it's a common

thing that I talk about all the time. So I'm going to come to a place like Israel where it's like

Spain is standing up against Israel and actually right now a lot of European countries are standing

up against Israel. Italy just came out denouncing Israel very harshly saying that they've crossed

the red line and that they'll be sanctioned. France has said they're no longer cooperating with

Israel at all. Spain has said they're not letting America use their bases anymore. But Spain's

gone even farther and they've been very like anti-Israel. At the same time, people running Spain

who are very, very anti-Israel are also giving out half a million citizenship, you know,

waivers to random Africans that made it into their country. They're murdering depressed girls

who were raped in a state orphanage and then the crime was covered up. It's like they're just

awful in every possible way, but they seem to be right about Israel. Europe, kind of the whole

continent is like this where it's like, hey, at least their food is edible, like they're wrong

about everything, but at least their food is edible. Europe slams Israel over death penalty bill

and freedom of religion. I mean, yeah, the death penalty bill, what we'll get into that because

again, it's just everything is false dichotomies. So we'll get back into the death penalty thing.

But the thing I really don't understand is it's like, okay, all of these topics seem to be

split into two and you gotta take one side or the other. And it's always the worst side

that gets what they want, like every single time. I don't understand it to be quite frank with

you and we'll get into a lot of other examples throughout this. But it really does seem like

it's just impossible to find any political movement at all that represents more than

50% of the population. And while they might believe some things that are just like basically true,

just like very basic and simple and obvious. I don't know. It's just like the craziest

extremist that we'll believe that. I just, I really don't get what the hell is going on in the

world. So why the hell did all of Europe give up its energy production? Why the hell did we

close the straight-forward moves? Why did we attack Iran? Like, why is any of this happening?

If it's not on purpose, that's when you understand, okay, the world, the European nations, America,

everywhere, basically except for a few places that you can probably figure out, Iran, Russia,

China. They're all controlled by psychopaths that are trying to set up a one-world government

and they need to eradicate mass amounts of humans in order to do that. First and foremost,

the humans that would stand up against such a tyrannical manifestation.

So then everything makes sense. Then it's like, okay, this all makes sense. It's still infuriating

and it's only possible because of the willing blindness of everybody underneath. And I don't

get how we break out of this false out of all of these false dichotomies, I should say.

I got to pull in some videos from yesterday.

Be up. Again, we need to be heading this off at the past. Like right now, they're modeling.

You know, the models, the models that they use to tell everybody that COVID would kill everybody,

that they use to justify the insane lockdown measures that were more damaging than the virus

itself. It's those same type of models that they're now running.

United Kingdom was one of the world's earliest adopters of coal. I mean, I've explained it before.

And like, this is the thing. It's like when I think about what we as Americans need to do to

free ourselves. Like, we can't be divided against ourselves. We have to come together and say at

the very least, can we not agree that America should be America first, that our government should

represent us and not a foreign nation like all of this seems obvious. But like in the outreach

to the leftist, like you guys got to stop being idiots. You got to stop falling for the bull crap.

Can we not all understand that Bill Gates does not have your best interest in mind when he's

running programs? I mean, we've been through. I mean, I just play the pitch meeting about

climate change, although that one sounds popular as others. I think people think I'm making it up.

But like everything in the pitch, in the climate change pitch meeting, you can find on

axe adheres and age Smith. It's all just straight out of the headlines. So like the stories about,

oh, they're no longer burning coal because that produces carbon. So now they're cutting down

forest in America, shipping it across the ocean, burning the trees and calling that carbon neutral.

Like that's insane. That's not the least of the insanity. 12 million trees cut down in Scotland

to build windmills, deforesting parts of the rainforest to have a climate change agenda meeting.

Start up by Bill Gates that is literally cutting down trees and burying them. Just burying them,

not using them for anything, just deforesting an area, burying the trees in the ground and calling

it carbon capture sinks. So the trees, the natural filters that take in carbon dioxide and

put out oxygen, those are being cut down and destroyed while they're producing giant machines

to try to siphon the carbon out of the air through gigantic filters. It's, I mean, this is all

absurd. So like, how do we come together on the left? I genuinely want to sit down on the left

and be like, do you really think anybody in the world is spraying sulfuric acid or ionized aluminum

into the atmosphere because they love you? Do you really think that's what they're doing? Do you

really think they're so concerned about preserving life on earth that they're going to irreversibly

poison the stratosphere? Like, what are you talking about? How can we not come together on this?

How is it only one side that sees through this? It is absurd. Same thing on the right. It's like,

okay, maybe you have your head on straight when it comes to like surveillance or big government

or with a welfare state, but then like, you will fight to the death for the right of Black Rock

to buy up every home in the state. It's like, what is going on? Why can people not just

see the truth for what it is? It really is the biggest problem in the world and like the

exclusive problem that we have to try to solve it. It really shouldn't be this difficult to come

together on all of this. And on that note, I want to go to clip 29 here. This is Brandon

Straca of the walk away movement. They've probably the best speech at CPAC this year.

Brandon Straca, clip 29. He's calling out, and he did it in such a brilliant way that it

it doesn't come across this way, but what he's actually doing here is directly calling out

the mega Israeli foreign influence in MAGA that is trying to dictate and control the conversation.

Because what he's asking is when did we become the left? And by the way, the woke right, as they

like to call it, the woke right, are not the ones who are acting like the left. We're not the ones

calling everybody Nazis and racist and bigots in order to shut them down because we can't actually

win debates. That's the mega side of things. That is the establishment Republican neon

neocon side of things that's doing that now. Let's go to clip 29. Here's Brandon Straca,

laying it out. When I was going through my hell, only two members, elected members of Congress took

my phone calls. Two, that was Lauren Bobert and Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Marjorie was one of the only elected members of Congress to visit J6ers in prison. She was the

only member of Congress to sponsor the Matthew Lawrence Pernibil, named after one of the J6ers who

committed suicide due to the brutality he endured at the hands of the United States government.

And a few years ago, she came to the walkaway booth at CPAC and held my hands and prayed with me

while the media took pictures of us and mocked us. And now a directive has gone out that Marjorie

Taylor Greene is a traitor. And if you want to be a part of the in crowd, it is mandatory that you

must hate her too. If I were to ask probably at least half the people in this room would say that

they didn't like her anymore. And if I were to ask why, I bet the majority wouldn't even know

themselves. When did we become the left? When did we become hive-minded, mean, and tribal?

When did we decide that not only must we cancel those we disagree with, but we must control the

people around us with intimidation, demanding that they think the way we think and join the

cancel mob to or be branded themselves? And when did we allow some of the most toxic, nasty,

and vicious people on the planet to become the spokespeople for MAGA and the arbiters of

purity tests deciding who is and isn't worthy enough to continue to call themselves MAGA?

But perhaps, most importantly, when did we decide that it was off-limits to question our own

government or the government of any other country? Let me tell you something. If you call yourself

a patriot, but you believe that it is your obligation to only praise and only worship your president,

then you must not be a patriot of this country, because leader worship is how citizens behave in

nations that aren't free. You can love your president, and you should, but it is your duty and your

obligation as a free citizen of the United States of America to challenge and question your government

every day regardless of who the president of the United States is.

So again, I think he's exactly right, and this sort of gets down to the, you know,

the fundamental characteristics of America. And I was thinking about this especially with the

passing of the death penalty law in Israel, which I believe, unless I'm mistaken,

represents the first time ever that a country has passed a law in which one ethnic group

can be given the death penalty, but that that punishment is spared other ethnic groups.

So the Palestinians now, when accused and denied the right to trial, can be executed by Israel,

and they're celebrating this and they're cheering this. I'll show you some videos about this

a little bit later, but it just strikes me that it is diametrically opposed to like the first

sentence of our founding document. Like you can't get anymore like primordial, then

we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. Now, obviously,

that's been perverted and twisted to represent some sort of weird equality where we're supposed to

pretend that person with 70 IQ and a person with 160 IQ should somehow score the same on test.

That's never what it meant. It meant that in the eyes of God and in the eyes of justice that every man

was born, you know, morally a blank slate. How can you justify anything that Israel does in that

paradigm? How could you possibly claim that anything Israel does represents the West or American

interests? Everything they do is diametrically opposed to everything we believe in, and that's

the same of the left wing in this country, and it's the same a lot of supposed mega, you know,

neocon infiltrators at this point. We don't have to like debate about what our country's morals are.

They were written down in documents, and they're firmly rooted in a metaphysical perception

of the world. It's derived from Christianity that everything our leadership does,

everything our banking class does, everything the foreigners do, and everything the left does

is all diametrically opposed to, just obvious. Please do find and share these videos at infowars.com

for its last show, band.video. We got a lot of corruption to try to sort through here,

and I want to go back and just there's been some newly released information or rather newly

popularized information, but it corresponds to and sort of dovetails with everything else we've

already known. Of course, over the weekend, the Tucker Carlson network made the BB files public,

that's a documentary about Benjamin Netanyahu. It was actually published, I believe, in like November

2024, something around that, but this was the first time it was released for free and publicly,

I guess, and it's gone totally viral. And a couple of scenes from it have stood out as highlights,

one of which is Benjamin Netanyahu admitting to funding Hamas with literal suitcases full of cash

and the purpose behind his willingness to do so. So I want to try to really lay out what all

of this means. We'll go first to that clip, clip number eight here, Netanyahu funded Hamas with

millions a month from Qatar, suitcases filled with US dollars delivered every single month

because they wanted Hamas, the violent party in Gaza to run things so they hadn't excuse to

attack him. Let's watch. The public blames Netanyahu for October 7th as the one who fed the beast.

He did not create Hamas, but he fed it. Netanyahu who is against peace and who is against

having a Palestinian state, dealt with Hamas for a long time as a strategic friend.

He says, this is confidential and can't be leaked, right? We have neighbors here, sworn

enemies. This is Benjamin Netanyahu speaking. I'm constantly passing the messages. I confuse them,

mislead them, lie to them, and then hit them over their heads.

It was important for him to keep Gaza under the control of Hamas and keeping the West back under

the control of Fateh and preventing them from being united in any way. In order to do so,

Netanyahu was all the time helping Hamas to survive.

At the same time that he was under investigation, he arranged for Hamas to receive 35 million dollars

every month from Qatar. Netanyahu can't give the money by himself. He's well, he will not give

money to the Hamas. You cannot even transfer this money through banks because even the banks don't

want to cooperate. So you, the Israeli Prime Minister, needs to beg this small and very rich country

Qatar to give money to our enemy. This suitcase of money was given to Hamas under the request of

Benjamin Netanyahu personally. And because the Qatarians knew him from the beginning,

they were asking him to send them his requests and writing, because they knew that he's going to lie in the future.

He allowed more than one billion to be transferred to the hands of the Hamas because he believed

that he can control the level of Fateh, it's nonsense. He cannot control the flames.

Yes, please Prime Minister, what is your opinion of Qatari money in Turingaza? Will it help keep

calm in the strip? Your spawns, I do whatever I can in coordination with the security agencies.

To bring quiet back to the towns in southern Israel. Every step has a price without exception.

You take steps as a leader, there is always a price. If you cannot handle the price, you cannot

lead. And I know how to handle the price. Your strategy was, keep Hamas there. We can

the Palestinian Authority on the West Bank sustain the extremists, weaken the moderate.

This exploded in our faces in the most brutal way on October 7th.

BB tells the world again and again and again. I'm the expert in terrorism. I know how to fight

terrorism. I'm the protector of Israel. And under his regime, we get into this incredible,

unbelievable war.

All right, so Israel drove suitcases, stuff of the cash into Gaza to keep Hamas in power. And

again, they explained the reasoning there. So all of the claims from all of the Israeli firsters,

all of the traitors like Laura Lumer and Mark Levin, all these people, Tucker Katarelsen,

it's all pure unadulterated 100% 200 proof projection. They are in bed with guitarries. They are

the ones funding Hamas. They are the only reason Hamas is in power at all on purpose because they

want an enemy to go to war with. All right, so the very existence of Hamas, their power in the Gaza

strip, their ability to have anything is all funded directly by American taxpayers who pay

everything that Israel has. It all comes from us. They send it to Qatar who sends it to Gaza

to keep the terrorists in power. Okay, that's just how it works. Take it up with reality if you

disagree. But we can take it a step farther than that because not only was Hamas allowed to operate

funded by the Israel, I mean, 35 million dollars a month.

It buys a hell of a lot of weapons. That buys a hell of a lot of, I don't know, cooperation

from people around could probably be spent on bribes or foreign states. I mean,

it's strategically incomprehensible if you don't understand that it's all designed to set up

Gaza to eventually receive the fate it is now experienced. If you had any legitimate concern

about Hamas at all, you wouldn't give them a dollar. This should be obvious. I shouldn't have

to explain this. But it goes way, way deeper than that. So we can go to the video I just put in.

This is from an official hearing in the Israeli Knesset with a soldier who was there on the front

line in between on the Gaza border with Israel on October 7th revealing that there was a stand-down

order for several hours directly telling before the attack you and began telling the Gaza patrols

to stand down and allowing the attack to take place. Let's watch.

October 7th, you're at the outpost. He's being asked and he responds, well, for us, October 7th

starts before 630. That was when the attack started. I was a soldier in the mortar platoon of the

Golanes Brigade 13th Battalion. And that night, myself, Yotar Surur, my sergeant, Temar Bin Yohuda,

Mehdi Restonpiece, the three of us were pulling an all-nighter. On Sabbaths and holidays, we'd let

ourselves pull an all-nighter until dawn stand to, and you know we're in the mortar platoon,

have time to sleep until the next stand to. So at 5.20am, we're sitting by the radio so as not to

wake up the radio operator. And my deputy commander, battalion commander, Nier Boynfield,

who was also seriously injured and thank God he survived, suddenly gets on the radio with a

strunt with a strange message. All stations, I don't know why I don't know how, something along those

lines. No patrols on the fence until 9am. What time was this? 5.20am in the morning.

And here's the recording of the audio. All stations are to hold their positions, so in terms of

ground forces and orev, we don't have anything significant. The brigade issued a directive to our

forces, pinning a situational assessment at until 9am. No vehicles to approach Burma. I'll say

again, until 9am in the morning, pinning the situation assessment, no vehicles to go down to Burma.

We're in rear staging areas of brigade level arrangement. I don't know exactly why.

I don't ask too many questions. That's the directive. That's what we do. This is before the

attack began. So a little before it all begins, and Tomor gives us a look like, what?

And you know we're simple soldiers, just combatants. No commanders or officers who can ask questions.

It's an order from the deputy battalion commander. We take the order and don't ask questions,

a routine passing of an order. And sure enough, an hour later, at 6.30, suddenly sirens.

Yuri, I'll tell you the truth. I've been living with this since October 7th.

This is in later on TV. And I was afraid to talk about it. And when I got to the kineset,

I was, it was after a period when I asked some of the officers what really happened there,

who were there. And there were some who initially told me, listen, there was a sniper threat from

nookboat. We didn't want to send soldiers, so they wouldn't get hit. And then over time,

it kind of dawned on me. I said, wait, if there's a sniper threat, how can it be that I,

whom only 200 meters from the fence, don't know there's a threat? How can it be my friends are

fighting without a vest in their underwear and socks? And nobody knows that something is

happening. We're only 200, 300 meters from the fence. And that was when my mind again,

and really I was suddenly invited to the kineset. I felt this was a real opportunity to open

this subject and talk about it, to actually understand what happened there. And look, like you're

saying, to a lot of people, it sounds strange. And actually what happened there, and we're going

to go back to this again, and I'll be honest, Hila, we, I've been living with some kind of

whole in my brain since October 7th. There's something in my heart feels to me that, listen,

I don't know what there was. I don't know what happened. I don't want to understand

happened like everyone. Look, the deputy battalion commander wasn't a sniper threat because the

deputy battalion commander says, I have no idea why. And not why in a sniper threat. There's

many times he says this in real time at 520 in the morning. It's not like someone told him to

say that. He received an order without an explanation. And it's right. So we as soldiers, he says,

when we hear this thing, then we of course follow orders. It did sound a little strange to us,

but soldiers in the field, and we've been on this line for almost half a year. And a few losses

here or there, you know, for a loss from October 7th, there are cool losses, yes, breaches of order,

right, from breaches of order to a situation, to events like those of October 7th, we're talking

about here, you know, something that's surreal, something very strange. Anyway, we can take it down,

you get it. You understand it. There was a standout order an hour before the attack began,

that you just heard the recording of saying, I don't know why, but you got to stand down till 9am.

The attack hadn't started yet. There was no sniper. Later they go back and say, well,

here's a good reason why we did that. Maybe there was a sniper. And it's like, okay, but I was right

there. There was no sniper. They didn't say there was a sniper. Didn't make any sense because

there were people out there with no vests on. Wouldn't you tell them there was a sniper if that

was the case? So that's a lie. There was no sniper. They told them to stand down because they

knew the attack was coming. And by the way, you know, the, you know, most sort of gruesome images

of the attack happened at the Nova music festival, which wasn't supposed to be there. And was without

explanation relocated days before the festival was supposed to happen. They decided, again,

with no reason, no justification to move that festival to a place directly in between it to

military installments, knowing that those two military installments were going to be attacked.

And that by necessity, the, you know, Hamas siege would inevitably run right into the Nova

music festival. This was all planned. It was all an operation. It was all an op, a false flag.

And there's, there's more to it than that. Of course, Egypt warned Israel days before Hamas

struck, according to a US committee chairman. And actually, one of Netanyahu's lieutenants

is having beef with him and just came out with an article and said, release the audio from the

Egyptians. That will ruin Netanyahu. So apparently, there's also recordings out there somewhere of the

Egyptians telling Benjamin Netanyahu exactly what was about to happen on October 7th, proving that

he knew exactly what was going on, which makes the stand-down order

beyond inexplicable, right? It would be inexplicable if there really was no foreign knowledge,

then why the hell would you tell people to stand down? But you do have foreign knowledge and

you still tell people to stand down? I mean, the stand-down order in and of itself is evidence.

I think of a stand-down order, but you could still claim it was just something coincidental.

But not if you actually have the facts on the ground. But then it goes a step beyond. So Netanyahu

funds Hamas. They receive signals and are aware that this attack is coming. They deliberately tell

the soldiers to stand down so the patrols aren't there when the fence first gets broken through.

Then there's an additional stand-down order of six hours while the pillaging goes on that nobody

is going to confront them. Then when the Israeli army does show up, it enacts the Hannibal directive

in which the Israeli army kills most of the people that died on October 7th. We can go to the

Vince Swan production about this. We won't watch the whole thing. But the first few minutes,

clip number nine, never forget on October 7th, Israeli military admitted to killing many of

their own people. Let's watch. Images and videos of burnt cars, blacked and charred bodies,

and incinerated homes in southern Israel were plastered on every phone screen and television

after the October 7th Hamas attacks. The images and videos were used by the Israeli government

to justify the military's heavy-handed tactics in their ongoing war against Hamas. But were they

actually the result of the Hamas attack? Surely, Israeli civilians were brutally killed by Hamas

on October 7th, but there's mounting evidence that we think any responsible journalist needs to

examine. Let's take a look at something called the Hannibal directive. I'm investigative journalist

Vince Swan, and this is Reckoning, Israel and Gaza.

So far in this investigative series, we have discussed how Israel had received concrete,

incredible intelligence from foreign intelligence agencies, their own military, and even Israeli

citizens about where and when the October 7th Hamas attacks would take place. The military

rammed through the approval of the Nova Music Festival at the last minute, despite pushback

from people within the army, and even threatened legal action against soldiers who tried warning

and preparing for the Hamas attack. And when the attack began, what did the military do? Well,

nothing. Evidence we've uncovered points to there being some type of military stand-down

at the beginning of the attack. But we need to take a look at another crucial aspect of that day.

When the IDF began to finally use their firepower and military to engage Hamas and southern Israel,

did they exclusively target enemy militants? Well, evidence actually points to no. To understand

what the Israeli military did to their own civilians on October 7th, you have to understand the

political aspirations of Hamas and what the goal of taking hostages is, political leverage.

There are over 10,000 Palestinians in Israeli jails, 3,000 of whom have not been to trial or

charge with the crime. When militant groups manage to capture Israeli civilians or soldiers,

it gives them leverage to force a prisoner's law and to get some of their people out of Israeli

prison. For example, in 1986, Hamas managed to kidnap three Israeli soldiers and bring them into

Gaza. They demanded 1,150 Palestinian prisoners in return for those three soldiers. Well, after this,

the military drafted a secret field order to prevent future kidnappings. It was called the Hannibal

directive. The directive gets its name from the Carthinogen general who chose to poison himself

rather than allow himself to be captured alive by the Romans. Back in 2003, again, strangely enough,

October 7th, 2003, three Israeli soldiers were taken hostage and brought into Lebanon.

Following the activation of the Hannibal directive, IDF attack helicopters fired indiscriminately

on 26 vehicles, thus ensuring the death of their own soldiers and therefore robbing

Lebanese militants of the ability to demand Israel make concessions. The last known application

of the Hannibal directive was 2014 in Rafa. Hamas fighters managed to capture an Israeli soldier,

Lieutenant Hadar Golden. Instead of allowing the lieutenant to be used as leverage by Hamas,

though, the military killed him, dropping bombs, missiles, and shells on the area he was being held,

killing that soldier and also a hundred Palestinian civilians. The scale of the Hannibal directive

on October 7th was entirely different, though, from those of the past. A retired Israeli air force

general, Nauf Ares, described it during a podcast with Herets and Israeli newspaper saying that,

quote, the Hannibal directive was apparently applied at a certain stage because at the moment they

understand there is a kidnapping. They immediately say, guys, this is a Hannibal. But the Hannibal we trained

for all of the last 20 years is for a vehicle we know at what point defense it enters on one side

it drives, maybe even on which road it drives. This was a mass Hannibal. Now, think about that term,

a mass Hannibal. We all know the Hannibal directive means to kill your own. So, what does mass Hannibal

mean? Well, if you look at Israeli media, you're going to find some pretty interesting things. Let's

read this quote directly from Wyndead, a large mainstream Israeli media outlet, quote, in the week

after Black Shabbat, October 7th. Soldiers of elite units at the initiative of the Southern

Command checked about 70 vehicles that remained in the area between the Otaf settlements and the

Gaza Strip. These are vehicles that did not reach Gaza because on the way there, they were shot

by a combat helicopter, an anti-tank missile or tank, and at least in some cases, everyone in the

vehicle was killed, in quote, 70 vehicles. And in some cases, everyone in the vehicle was killed.

These are Israelis killed by Israel. Again, only reported on in Israeli media. Here in the US,

we keep seeing pictures repeatedly of cars burnt to a crisp as evidence of Hamas' barbarism.

But was it Hamas' AK-47s and homemade rockets that burnt all these cars to a crisp? Or perhaps

hellfire and anti-tank missiles? Tuvala Scapia is a member of the security team for the Kubut's

Barrary. He said of a hotline. So, Kubut's residents could communicate with the Israeli army.

He told her rest, the quote, the commanders in the field made difficult decisions,

including shelling houses on their occupants in order to eliminate.

Again, this goes on, Ben Swandas. It does a fantastic and thorough job of breaking this down.

Vigilant news has it episode four. What is the Hannibal directive reckoning Israel and Gaza? So

Netanyahu funds Hamas. They issue stand-down orders before the attack

begins. They move the Nova music festival into position before the attack begins. Once the

attack begins, even though they had four knowledge of it, they do nothing to respond for six

hours. That's the second stand-down order. Then when they do respond, they kill a bunch of

their own people to maximize the death count and get the impetus for the planned Warren Gaza.

All of this was planned long, long before any of it came to fruition. And then on top of that,

they come up with a couple of really ridiculous lies that are immediately disproven, but nevertheless,

still find themselves cropping up in discussions about this, including the 40 beheaded babies,

put in ovens, and the mass rape gangs. None of that ever happened. There's been no proof for it.

It's actually all been thoroughly discredited, those claims. It doesn't matter, though, okay?

I mean, we've heard from people in the Kubutzes, hostages that were recovered saying, yeah,

it was the Israeli government that was firing at us. It was the Israeli government that tried

to kill us, okay? So none of this is speculation. All of this is confirmed from official sources.

This is not complicated. So what is it all for? What is it all about? It was all in service

of what's happening right now. The Iran War, the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad in Syria,

and the takeover of Lebanon, just like they did under Gaza. We can go now to clip number 27.

This has been Zaniyahu admitting what I've been trying to tell you for the last two years

that all of this is in service of building up Israel to be a competitor with America and a super

power in its own right. Here's Zaniyahu saying exactly that. And this is the guarantee for our

future. We are working on transforming Israel into a super nation in the region and globally,

and we were able to do so thanks to our soldiers and our captains and all those who fought and those

who died. And of course, thanks to your solidarity and your steadfastness.

So there's Zaniyahu saying that Israel will become a super power in thinking all of us

idiotic Western countries for doing the heavy lifting for them, for granting this to them,

for gifting this to them on a silver platter made out of our own, you know, sweat, blood,

piles of cash that they then send to Hamas. All of this is on purpose. Put yourself in the position

of Benjamin Aiyahu November or rather August 2023, right. You're about to be brought up on

corruption charges that they've got you dead to rights and you're going down. But you believe

you have this messianic, you know, belief that you are this all important, you know, figure that

will bring about the antichrist. And your goal to achieve this is to create the greater Israel

project, but you can't just do that. I mean, you've seen the way that despite the hypocrisy

incumbent and all of it, you've seen the way that Russia was demonized for simply trying to defend

themselves and seeing crunchment of NATO. You can't just go in and try to take land. I mean,

they could, because there is really, and the law's done apply to them and everything gets inverted

when it's Israel and not another country doing it. So, you know, but you gotta, you gotta have a

reason, you gotta have an excuse. You don't have an excuse, but your plan is to destroy an annex,

Gaza, destroy an annex, the West Bank, destroy an annex, large portions of Lebanon, take out Syria,

take out Iran, leave them either as puppets under your control or simply as, you know, chaotic

battlefields that you'll get around to eventually once you're done judyizing the places that you're

annexing right now. You can't just go do this. You have to have an excuse. So you create October 7th.

You do the Hannibal directive. You maximize the pain that Israel is feeling. And so you have this

very, you know, anxious, like disturbed, concerned, fearful populace that is just like, okay,

just do it. Just protect us. Whatever you can do, because they've been, you know,

mass traumatized by your operation. Of course, they don't know or they're lying about it being your

operation. And so they either are tricked into or are just, you know, lying along with you and

pretending to be scared of Gaza and saying, oh my god, we can't wait. We can't think about it. We

can't debate whether or not we should bomb the hospital. This is an emergency bomb the hospital.

Bomb it right now. Bomb all the hospitals. Bomb all the schools. It's World War 3, you guys.