WAR ROOM [2 of 3] Tuesday 3/31/26 • FULL-SPECTRUM - News, Reports & Analysis • Infowars

All right. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. I'm going to get back a little bit into what's

going on in the Middle East. You've got pogroms happening against Christians in Syria

while their leader shakes hands and meets with European leaders in 10 Downing Street because

all of this is, I mean, the people in power just don't actually believe anything. I hope

that's been established now. So ridiculous. But this occurred just before the show began.

I haven't actually watched it yet. Apparently, James O'Keefe was just served a restraining order

at his West Palm Beach headquarters while live on air. So let's go to this clip number

four here. This is James O'Keefe who's been leading this charge. He calls the Justice League

where a whole bunch of independent reporters are going and investigating and capturing, like

red handed guilty footage of people handing out money for signatures. I imagine that's

what this has to do with. Let's watch clip number four.

Have you ever served a domestic restraining order against a newsroom before? You ever

serve a restraining order against a journalist? I'm not sure to be honest with you.

Sir, I don't, sir, I don't think you understand what you're involved in here. I don't, I

don't understand. I don't know what everybody does for a living. So I may answer somebody

that's, well, we're, we're, we're, we're a news organization. There's something called

the, uh, the First Amendment. And it, and it doesn't, it prohibits people from serving

restraining orders against us from reporting what they say. It's a pretty fundamental

constitutional right. Again, this is a quarter or side by judge. I don't, I mean, all we're

doing is serve it to you. Well, I look very much, I look very, much forward to speaking

with that judge and talking to them. So what is all this? This is the, okay, your

responsible for everything that's in the, in the, uh, restraining order. Okay. There's,

you know, well, thank you for being here. And I will tell it to the courts. I know you're

just doing your job. But, uh, I hope you, uh, I hope you watch the video of the man

saying he wants to kill me. I know, I know. One of the problems in this country is that

we're, we're in a constitutional crisis. I, I'm just telling you my opinion. And we report

people break in the law. We report people doing illegal things and, and they're never held

accountable. I'm the one who's brought to court. I'm the one who's arrested. I'm the

one who's sued. And the American people are just pissed off. They're just upset. And I,

I know this has nothing to do with you. I know you don't, you can't say anything. I respect

that. I'm, I'm just a little upset. I'm a little discouraged. I'm, I'm losing hope.

And I'm, I'm the guy that can't lose hope because people look up to me. But I'm the one

who keeps getting held accountable. You understand what I'm saying? Something has to change,

not for my sake, but for our children's sake. You know what I mean? And I, I know you're

just doing your job and I get it. I understand, but, but we're, we're entering a constitutional

crisis in the United States. And, and, and today I've got a, a police officer bringing

me to court, you know, and I, and I got, I got to ask myself, why am I even, why am I

even doing this? What, why should I continue? That's the question that, that I have to ask

myself. If it's just going to bring me pain and punishment and abuse, you know what I mean?

And I, and I get there's nothing you can do. It's not your job. You know, but here we

are. That's where we are in this country. So I mean, I, literally off top of my head,

I could probably name like at least 10 things that James O'Keefe has uncovered that are like

truly criminal conspiracies. I mean, what he's covering right now in California, absolutely

criminal beyond any speculation or anything. Humboldt Sheriff County Department just served

me with the domestic violence restraining order from Matthew Tehrman, the former board member

from Project Veritas who says he wants to murder me. Despite attempting multiple times

on, admitting multiple times on hidden camera, he want, uh, wanting me dead. Matthew Tehrman

follow a restraining order against me in Miami-Dade County, saying things such as, quote, I would

kill him, O'Keefe, because he's one of the most evil people I've ever known, even shot

up my book with rifle bullets through my heart on the cover, the audacity of evil as no

bounds.

So something strange happened today, and I think, I think it might just be something we

like to call magic fairy dust. I think there's magic fairy dust in the world. I think that

there's been a, I don't know, some sort of spell cast. I don't know if a fairy godmother

is at work, perhaps some, you know, cute little animal helpers, uh, cropped up. Something

has happened to Lindsey Graham, the princess. Our princess Lindsey Graham, uh, has transformed

at midnight back into a pumpkin, I guess. I don't know. It's got to be something. And all

we know about Lindsey Graham is that he spent the last couple of days suspiciously wandering

around Disney World with a, a fairy scepter. Doing god knows what, doesn't have kids,

doesn't have friends or a wife. So I guess just buy him, just solo Disney World trip with

the, uh, fairy scepter in tow. And something happened in this time. We don't know if Tinkerbell

sprinkled something on his nose. Uh, there could have been some sort of wishing upon a star

situation. We, you know, we're really, we're open to all suggestions, but something has happened

here where Lindsey Graham has transformed from Neocon back into a patriot. Again, if we, if we

have better suggestions, I'd, I'd love to hear from them. Uh, we've been reaching out to

Jimmy Cricket. He refuses to come on, but we're really, we're trying to get to the bottom of this.

Okay, you know, maybe had a long in depth talk with Minnie Mouse. Could be Mickey and Minnie

sitting there like, you're not supposed to kill children, Lindsey. He's like, thanks for telling me,

you guys, you've really opened up my eyes. I don't know. We don't know what it is, but something magical

has occurred at the magic kingdom and has transformed Lindsey Graham into somebody with the,

the bare minimum amount of patriotism to recognize that Iran and war with Iran is not actually

in our best interest. Quote, wind down Iran war, wind up efforts for peace deal says Senator

Lindsey Graham of all people. There's a couple options here. One of them is magical intervention.

Okay, we're not discounting that. I just, I would think there would be signs of some sort.

Lindsey Graham, we haven't seen him in address. I'm not saying he doesn't wear one.

I've never seen him with glass slippers, but it's possible. So that's one option. The other option

is that he finally took a look at the polls from his home state of South Carolina and realized

that being a despicable, closeted homosexual war mongering freak is not exactly the most

electable thing. Oh, yeah. Then yesterday he posted a picture of a shotgun yesterday,

spent some, I'm sorry. Yesterday spent some time breaking clays in Edgefield County today.

Doesn't get much better than that. I thought you were a Disney world. Are you shooting Disney

characters? Is Lindsey Graham hunting the Disney characters? Is that what's happening here?

I mean, just the most transparent coverup I've ever seen. Lindsey, they've got pictures of you

with the gay scepter at Disney World all by yourself. And he's like, quick, go in the archives and

find me it. Find a picture of me looking manly. Find a picture of me with a gun or something.

Okay, that worked. No, work, work, and events. We are all tricked. Okay, so these are the, yeah,

that's more like it. These are the options. Either Lindsey Graham's fairy godmother has finally

smacked him with a wand and to shake his brain loose and he understands that Warthoron is stupid

in every possible way. Or he's looked at the internal polling and realized that his career is over.

If he doesn't change literally everything about himself from the bottom up. Or this is literally

all according to plan. And now that they have gotten what they wanted out of Trump, the ridiculous

completely ill advised. And at this point, thoroughly disastrous warner on. And now they're

throwing him under the bus. And they're going to say, well, yeah, I said we should have peace.

I mean, a month into it, I said, Trump, time to throw in the towel, brother.

There's a lot of words I can't say right now. Lindsey Graham said Monday, he's encouraged President

Trump to wind down the Warthoron, wind up efforts for peace while noting that it would take an

agreement from both parties to resolve conflict at least. Yeah, that's true. Good point.

Keep it up, Mr. President, wind down the War and wind up efforts for historic peace deal,

Graham said on a post on social media platform X. It works for Lindsey. Should I just do the whole

show? I mean, is this how I should talk? It works for him. I don't know what it is.

He's touting serious discussions in what Trump described as a new and reasonable regime in Iran.

Graham has come under criticism for public comments that seems to suggest support for

using ground troops in Iran. Yeah, it seems to suggest that when he's like, we need ground troops

in Iran. It's like, yeah, it seems like he wants ground troops in Iran. I'm picking up a signal here.

Quote, Washington's war machine is hard at work. They're trying to drag us into Iran to make it

another Iraq. We can't let them said representative Nancy Mace and a post on X last week. And yes,

when we say Washington's war machine, we mean Lindsey Graham, she said. Graham continued to

support military action in his remarks on X, but lean towards finding a diplomatic solution.

I support diplomatic efforts to end the conflict consistent with our military objectives,

but it takes two to tango. You would know. The necessity for military action is weeks, not months,

and operation epic theory is well ahead of pace, he wrote on X. Okay, so something strange is

happening. Something mystical and magical and curious is unfolding before us as

is somebody is anybody calling Lindsey Graham a panicking? Is anybody claiming that he is a

anti-Semite that he wants to kill all the Jews? No, so he's allowed to oppose the war in Iran.

Okay, so he's only allowed to oppose the war in Iran after it's at a point to which there is no

return. I'm sensing a pattern here with a bunch of people, you know, yesterday there was an

interview with Larry Fink where he came out against DEI and ESG, the very things that he and his

organization invented in the first place and then imposed on everybody using their monopolistic

control of the American financial market. Now he's against it, now he's opposed to it.

You know what that means? That means they've run the numbers, they've run the algorithms,

they've fed it into the simulation machine in AI and they've determined it's too late for us to

do anything about it. So now they can come out against it. Now that the damage that they've done

is irreversible, they can pretend to be the champions against the very thing that they attacked

us with. I'm sensing a similarity with a Lindsey Graham. Now that you believed Lindsey Graham,

now that you listened to him and did what he wanted and got us into trouble from which there is

seemingly no escape. Now he's going to come out and say, actually, this was a bad idea all along.

Does anybody else sick of this? Senator Lindsey Graham, I'm going back to South Carolina asking

them to send their sons and daughters over to the mid east. Yeah, how'd that work out for you?

Princess, how'd that work out for you, Lady Graham?

Oil slides as Trump reportedly told AIDS. He's willing to end the war without reopening

horror movies. Again, I mean, I cannot explain what a ridiculous failure this is. It's almost

funny to me arguing with people on X that are still supporting this war. Lindsey Graham doesn't

even support the war anymore. President Trump doesn't even support the war anymore. We are now one

month and a few days into this war and it's already a disaster for which are best possible scenario.

Our best case scenario at this point is not even returning to status quo, not even getting back

to a pre-war situation. So we can just write off this whole war like, okay, it costs us billions

of dollars. People died. Right families have been shattered.

Money's been just spent with abandoned. I mean, there's already been a bad stuff, but hey,

we're just going right back to normal. Like if that was the case, it would already be a ridiculous

disaster. We're not even trying to get the straights of horror movies open anymore, apparently.

So now, according to the people in power, the best case scenario is we get back to a position

that we were before the war only significantly impoverished and not having controlled the

straight of horror movies significantly weakened in every possible way. We're only a month in,

I already feel like demanding apologies from everybody that got us into this because it's already

been shown that there is no positive outcome even possible from people in power.

So where do we go from here? Because it seems to me like all of these things need to be just

sort of added to the list. Now, we're lucky because it's all the same people doing this.

Like all of these different things, otherwise the list would be just inconceivably huge,

but it's not that big. It's, you know, a certain amount of people because when Larry

think comes out and admits ESG or DEI wasn't the best thing to do.

He's not talking about some sort of like Chick-fil-A unveiled a new coupon that didn't

deal wasn't that popular. It's not like this is just like some small thing. They're like,

hey, let's try this out over here and not didn't work. Okay, never mind. We're calling that off.

They deliberately reorganized our entire society. They deliberately excluded an entire generation

specifically of white men but of white people overall from the power structure.

The effects of that have been devastating to a degree that we can't even calculate and is

only going to get worse as we move forward. Okay.

So I don't think we need to move on from this. I think we need to charge these people with

crimes against humanity because they knew exactly what they were doing. So that's sort of the

theme of everything that we're talking about today, isn't it, that all of this stuff is deliberate,

that all of these outcomes were imminently predictable. If not manufactured on purpose for

this exact outcome, we sit now on the cusp of a new new world order where Israel is a absolute

superpower. America has had our ability to project power thoroughly diminished. We've been humiliated

on the world stage. China is rising. Iran is now proven that they can stand on their own.

And if they are entering talks, which the president of Iran is talking about possibly entering talks,

they say like, but we need guarantees that we won't be attacked in the future. Well,

who's going to trust guarantees from Israel or America? Those guarantees mean nothing.

Literally while you're negotiating the guarantees, it's likely they'll bomb you to death.

So it's like the guarantees that they won't be attacked anymore is in a eradication of Israel

in America's ability to attack them uncontested. I'll say again, the purpose of Israel's war against

Iran is to leave it in a state like Syria in a condition that the state of Syria is in,

in which they can bomb them whenever they want for whatever reason what they want and that the

country they're bombing has no ability to respond. That's the ideal condition for Israel.

Is that Iran is just a fractured mess, a chaotic hell world of interminable conflict between

ethnic factions that Israel can occasionally come in, bomb some infrastructure. They call it

mowing the lawn, right? That's what they want in Iran. That's what they want in the Middle East.

It's what they want really around the entire world. Just they have to start with their immediate

neighbors, but they'll expand. That's the purpose of all of this. So again, whether it's the

war in Iran and the lockdowns that are coming as a consequence or the stand-down orders that led

to the attack on October 7th that led to the invasion of Gaza that led to Hezbollah getting

involved that led to the invasion of Lebanon. These things are all planned for and you know that's

the case because literally on October 9th, I hosted the Alex Jones show and laid all of this out

for you and said very specifically how this would inevitably lead to a greater conflict with Iran

and that Israel would necessitate American boots on the ground to achieve their goals in Iran

and we see the push towards that forever. So it's not enough to allow these people to pretend

like they've had a change of heart and are now on the side of right. They got us into this mess

on purpose deliberately and only were able to do so by silencing those of us or trying to

discredit those of us who are warning against it the entire time. So again, it's like I don't know

what it's like to be one of you jackasses that's just wrong about everything all of the time, but

I literally have people in my comments that were wrong about COVID, wrong about lockdowns, wrong

about the 2020 election, wrong about January 6th, just wrong about everything and then condescending

to me about, you know, we're going to take their oil, right. Andrew Meyer, smart dude,

typically against war is in this delusional belief that somehow this is this is all part of

the plan and we're going to take Iran's oil and you know China is going to suffer because of it

and it's just like where are you getting this dude. I don't understand what's going on these

fuels minds, but I'm going to keep just like trusting in reality and just saying the truth and

just being right about literally everything all of the time, okay. That's where I'm coming from.

And by the way, Iran is on our side, not America's side obviously, but America's side,

absolutely. And I said this right before the Iran war started, so many made a comment about

me and Ayatollah Khameini and I simply responded, we have all of the same enemies. I don't know what

else to tell you. Who are Khameini's enemies? Benjamin Netanyahu, well, guess what?

Oh, the American big tech Epstein class? Yeah. No, the friend of the enemy of my enemy is my friend

and now they're doing a great service for all of us by bombing big tech, tech infrastructure

to smithereens. At least we hope that they'll follow through with this threat. Iran vows to strike

US tech firms in Middle East. And basically they're saying, look, if you're Amazon or Microsoft or

Oracle or Palantir and you're helping to target us, then we're going to destroy your infrastructure.

And I got to wonder how they're going to deal with this because,

I mean, so much stuff is on the cloud now. I'm not totally sure of how backups work in this regard,

but if Iran destroys a server farm for Amazon, is everybody lose their information?

Is that even recoverable? We have this idea that you put some on a cloud,

it just goes into this sort of permanent infrastructure somewhere. It's out there somewhere,

because there's no such thing as a cloud. It's just somebody else's computer.

So what happens if you've worked with Amazon for a long time, your entire business is built

on their server system to not be eradicated by Iran. And if that's the case, what does Amazon

do about that? How are they ever trusted ever again? Maybe we need to have a major separation

between companies that service customers and countries that are working as the operating system

for the tyrannical genocide campaign of the Epstein class. Maybe you can do one or you can do

the other, but maybe it's a little bit dangerous to cross-pollinate the two.

Now, luckily, Iran, unlike us, we're out there bombing, I think we've bombed like 60 schools

at this point. We went to libraries. We bombed the university in Tehran. We're bombing civilians

as a matter of course in our terror campaign. Iran has had the courtesy to warn people,

so hopefully the employees will be able to get out. I don't want people to die, just because

they worked for Oracle or whatever, but I would be happy to see their infrastructure eradicated

personally. Am I the crazy one? I mean, they're literally building a cage around us. They're

building a digital panopticon to enslave us. And I don't know, it seems like at a certain point,

if I get to the point where you know, kind of like the blade runners in the UK, the gents,

they go around and take down cameras and the ULEZ ultra low emission zone surveillance equipment,

like they just go and just physically tear down the infrastructure needed to impose tyranny.

Like we could get to that point here in America, which also should go into the planning for

the powers that be, because they're pouring trillions of dollars into building databases.

Gigantic databases bigger than you can possibly conceive of. The one in Ohio requires enough

the equivalent power of nine nuclear power plants to run. And it's like that's all finding good for

like enslaving people in this digital existence that they want to create for us, but like what happens

when there's like a dude with bolt cutters who can shut your whole thing down. Like what happens

when like a little bit of like thermite and bolt cutters are enough to utterly destroy your entire

system. I mean, you can't harden these places really to any sufficient degree. I know they're

built, they're trying to like build some under mountains and stuff. And yeah, I think that's

to protect it from us because it's the infrastructure and the physical components of the global

slave system. So hell, if Iran can just take them out from the air, that would save us a lot of

trouble. This is the point we're getting to by the way. And there's nothing really worth preserving

anymore that I can look at and I can see too. I mean, everything is just getting significantly

worse faster. So there's got to be a break at some point. There's got to be a diversion, a

reflection of the trend. And we'll see when and how that comes, but

I think it's overdue. I think it's a long overdue. And I

am in favor of not voting for Republicans because obviously

they're just the worst. I am, you know, they're like actually worse than the liberal somehow. It's

weird, but that seems to be the true. However, the idea of accelerationism is historically

completely retarded, sorry, to use the word, but that's the case.

All you have to do is look at countries where this has happened. Just look at South Africa.

And people have this idea that's like, well, maybe we just make everything worse. That'll force

people to rise up. Now, absolutely not. Look at South Africa. There are still liberal progressive

in South Africa, a place where over half the population is entirely dependent on welfare,

in which some vanishingly small minority of white people pay all of the taxes that support

everybody else. There's still in a state of absolute collapse, South Africa. I can show you

videos from today, but people are just going around knocking down streetlights to steal the copper

out of a phenomenon that we're seeing crop up here in America, increasing with increasing

regularity. There are still, there's still an immigration problem into South Africa.

There are still people from other countries going to South Africa because it hasn't all been

looted yet. So the idea that like accelerationism will somehow lead to a, you know, sudden creation

of, I don't know, it just doesn't make any sense, doesn't make any sense. So I'm not, I'm not one

of these people that's like, we have to vote for Democrats because then people realize how bad

they are. No, like that's, that's stupid. I just think voting for Republicans and expecting

anything different is even stupider. And I think maybe, just maybe, if we stop the Iran war

and put all of our effort and energy into trading a third party or actually genuinely taking over

the reigns of power from the Republican party, but I think that's kind of a dead end operation.

I think we need Joe Kent, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Taming up with anarchist,

Barion and Rokana. I think we need to bridge the gap between these two sides, recognize that both

sides are serving the same interests at the end of the day and that we can break free from this.

To help, we have to give up 2028 to truly, thoroughly and once for all, destroy the Republican

party in order to create something new and better, then that's fine. I'm open to taking extraordinary

steps while there are still some remnant of people that believe in our founding principles that

can take power once the dust is settled. I'm just brought in a bunch of sheets about

Dan Bongino and Thomas Massey having a back and forth. Should we go, is there worth to go over this?

I mean, do I have to? Like, does anybody have to read this?

Can we do some fortune telling? Can I guess Dan Bongino is an idiot?

Thomas Massey is correct. I mean, what do we expect to happen here? Is Dan Bongino going to,

is he going to totally expose Thomas Massey? Do we think that's going to happen? What do we think,

class? Am I supposed to go through this? Is that what's supposed to happen here?

I mean, I can. We just want to see just how right Thomas Massey is, but we'll save this. I'll save

this for a second. But I guess he does go to sort of what we're talking about and where this goes.

This article from the New York Times, which I'm glad the New York Times is coming out with this,

because as ridiculous as it is, Trump at least gives a lot of credence to these old kind of

establishment media outlets. New York Times, of course, would be the premier media outlet. And they,

it's hard to express how kind of damning this article is because it's not like vitriol. It's not

like they're spewing hatred for Republicans. They're just sort of explaining what's happening at CPAC

and how everybody is disillusioned in the Republican Party. So again, it's not even like,

I don't know how to explain. You always have to read the whole thing, but it's just you just get

this sense of just this wet blanket over everything. That this person goes to CPAC and it's just like

everything's kind of disappointing. It's just kind of like, you know, he says that the first day of

the conservative political action conference wound to a close, the audience inside the airplane

hanger size ballroom had dwindled as Nick Shirley, the headline speaker, mumbled his remarks. Mr.

Shirley, a 23 year old content creator recently minted a right wing celebrity had been tapped by

the content creator and recently minted, I'm sorry, tapped by the conferences organizers to bring

a youthful jolt of energy to the proceedings, but youth themselves and the conservative energy

were nowhere to be seen among the rows of empty chairs as Mr. Shirley made halting reference to

Theodore Roosevelt's man in the arena speech. Just kind of like, oh,

oh, it's and again, the reason I'm saying this is not to like, you know, crap on Nick Shirley,

I think he's great not to like, celebrate the fact that there's been this deflation in the

conservative movement. It's to point the finger at directly, directly at the people causing it,

the people who are responsible for it. The reason why it's like this is 100% because of Israel

and because of the Jewish influence on the Trump administration. That's it. That's the reason.

There's you don't need to look anywhere else, folks. It's not complicated. It's not something

that you need to debate. It's like very imminently obvious to absolutely everybody that's paying

attention. And you can say it shouldn't be that way, but it is. So what are you going to do about it?

It's like, no, but they should be in favor of us going to war with Iran. It's like, okay, but but we're

not. So what are you going to do about it? Are you going to try to convince us? So far, you don't

even have an argument. So far, your only argument has been to tell us to shut up and get behind

Trump because we have to because the Democrats are worse. I guess, yeah, a little bit,

but at least I don't give a false hope. At least, I don't know, they might actually do something

we could benefit from in some way. What do we supposed to say you people have destroyed this

movement thoroughly and on purpose and by design? Yeah, it's not that complicated, folks.

Pretty much everybody that joined the Trump administration in 2024, who he is now serving

endlessly and rapidly. Like, there's no hesitation. They want something. They get it.

Doesn't matter if it's setting new precedent or in violation of our basic fundamental principles

of free speech, anything like that. Doesn't matter. They get what they want.

And these people are not Republicans and never have been Republicans and do not like the

Republican Party and spent their entire lives up till 2024 trying desperately to destroy

not just the Republican Party, but everything we believe.

And then they join in 2024. So like, just really imagine this.

Really imagine you go to somebody who has been voting Democrat since the 80s,

just went over to Trump and you go to that person, you go, hey, this is destroying the Republican

Party. What do you think they're going to be like, oh, no, I don't care. They've been working

their whole lives to destroy the Republican Party. They just hadn't figured out the most effective

way to do it. Now they have. Now they have. Can't destroy America from the outside. What do you do?

You take it from the inside. You commit it to a possible to win

war overseas over and over again until you grind it down into a stump of its former self.

How do you destroy the Republican Party? You get elected on a mandate for mass deportations

for eliminating the woke crap and DEI for saving trillions of dollars from the federal budget.

But most importantly, the mass deportations and the arresting of criminals. And then you take

all of that effort and you take all of that victory and you waste it all deporting college students

who write papers about Palestine and then going to war with Iran. That is the most efficient

and effective way to destroy the Republican Party, possibly the only way. And that's what they're

doing. It's not sophisticated. It's very blunt how they're doing it. It's just everybody in the

media is in favor of them doing this as well. And so they're not going to report on it accurately.

They're going to report on it in a way that guarantees it continues. But I mean this whole

article is extremely accurate. Extremely accurate and extremely kind of depressing, but it more just

it more just shows the disconnect and the collapse and the way that the Republicans really are

kind of living in a fantasy world in exactly the same way the left was living in a fantasy world

under Kamala Harris. And of course the comparison between last year and this year is possibly the

most illustrated part of it. Last year's meeting struck a triumphant tone as Elon Musk cranked a

chrome chainsaw on stage and President Trump gleefully recounted the tale of his political comeback.

But for the past several years, a younger crowd has declared the event pass A. That's funny for

the past several years, but last year was good. But last year the energy was high. Elon Musk, Donald

Trump, everybody was there and promising to get things done. We had just won this incredible

impossible victory and the world was ours. We had the Congress. We had the Senate. We had the

Supreme Court and the presidency literally a full house where we could do anything that we wanted.

And absolutely all of it was sacrificed on the altar of Israel, all of it. Tell me I'm wrong.

Point to something that Trump has succeeded in and you can make excuses. You can pretend to believe

their reasoning. It only ever goes one way. The mass deportations were far more popular than the

Iran war is. They had no problem with that. Somehow when it's mass deportations that have a 80%

approval rate can't get it done. It's too politically hot. They can't touch it. We got to scale back too

many bad headlines. But then when it's worth Iran, which has an 11% approval rating, we're doing it.

We do it. It doesn't matter. All the backlash, all the anger. It's all managed both fine. It's stupid.

They're all stupid. We just don't have to listen to them. Do you understand that if we wanted

to do any of this stuff, I mean going back to Harvard is like the best example for me.

Where it's like you would even after they forced the resignation of the president of Harvard

because you refused to crack down on the free speech of her students and they came up with different

reasons to claim it was about DEI or she plagiarized something. Obviously, all nonsense.

And it's like for 10 years, Harvard is teaching classes about how to eradicate whiteness,

the evil incumbent in white skin taught by Jewish professors.

We point this out. We're outraged by this. Hey, look, how are you having the premier

university in America teaching things that are just, I mean, it's straight out of a inverted version

of Jim Crow literature. What are we doing here? And we're told like, well, what should we do?

What could we possibly do? It's Harvard. It's just they get to teach whatever they want. We can't

do anything, but the government certainly can't interfere. We have a sacred obligation to uphold

free speech and glorious Harvard gets to use that however they want. It's like, but Harvard's

supporting Palestinians and it's like, then we have to get rid of their endowment.

Then we withhold billions of dollars and force the change that we want. We demand that the

president step down. And if they don't, then we contact all of the donors to Harvard. And we

have them withdraw support and we bankrupt them or they do what we say. They fire the people that

we don't like. They replace them with people that we do like or we destroy their institution.

And it's like, so you could have done this at any point. So at any point, you had

perfectly available there for your within reach, all the levers you could possibly need to

bring about a change that would actually benefit not just white people that are being viciously

discriminated against not just in the class, but in the matriculation as well.

Can't do it. Refuse to do it won't even broach it. You act stupid. You act ignorant. How could we

possibly? But then the instant that it looks like it might have a minor possibly detrimental effect

to the war aims of Israel. Then all of the sudden, all of these levers are pulled.

All of the pressure is brought to bear and Harvard is forced to bend the knee.

That's the situation everywhere. That's the situation with just about every topic we cover, every

event we complain about. It's like imminently solvable. And the very people that will refuse to

solve it that will act like it's impossible to solve will act like it's what we can't set

president or we can't, we got to be careful. If we do it to them, they'll do it to us or

we're upholding sacred free speech. They all are just liars. They're just liars and they will

immediately do absolutely anything necessary to achieve whatever they need to for Israel, no matter

how tangential it is to the actual thing happening, right? There's no real actual threat of like

Harvard hippies pitching a tent on Harvard lawn. It doesn't actually affect anything,

but it's about the symbol and it's about the total control of these institutions that has to be

maintained. It's a supremacy ideology that does not brook even the slightest deviation,

not if they have the power to rein you in and or destroy your life for opposing them.

So I don't even want to get to that level. I actually oppose that because these people are

tyrannical jackasses. I don't want to do that. I just want to illustrate to you the absurdity

of the claims that well, there's nothing we can do about this or we're trying our hardest and

you know, you review people just need to keep voting for Republicans. It's like show us one iota,

one percentage of a percentage of the same care and effort that you show for foreigners that

despise you. And maybe we can talk, but until you even just pretend to be on our side,

why the hell would we subject ourselves to your rule willingly? This is absurd.

It's all absurd. And of course, the New York Times gets it, the Democrats get it,

right? They're talking about running just like normal white guys that everybody can get behind.

We don't want any radicals out front, even though they know everybody that they're voting in

votes radical. They at least understand the perception that needs to be maintained.

The Republicans are deliberately retarded, stupid. They're deliberately very stupid, not retarded.

Special needs. They're all very special needs, okay?

After talking with other young attendees at the conference, Mr. Hufses said most

appeared to be aligned with Mr. Fuentes, who's become a pariah within the conservative movement.

Now hold on. Let me dissect this sentence for you here.

Most appear aligned with Mr. Fuentes, who has become a pariah within the conservative movement.

How could somebody who has the support of most of the people be a pariah? How does that work?

That because there's a small number of people on the top, who in a top-down sort of way

are saying that he's a pariah, even though he's immensely popular with all the people,

that is out. I think that's what's happening here. I think I know who.

He's become a pariah in the conservative movement, apparently, even though he has the

overwhelming support of all the people. Amongst other reasons, his recent declaration the young

conservatives should express their displeasure with Mr. Trump's military strikes on Iran by voting

for Democrats. Quote, I'd say at least 60% of the young people here are fans of Nick. Mr. Hufses

said. The subject of the war in Iran, a source of consternation for many young people in the crowd,

was engaged with lightly on the main stage and otherwise relegated to exhibition hall gimmicks,

such as gauging support for the conflicts with piles of Pinto beans.

And if this was a righteous war that was going well, would that be the case?

I mean, they're basically trying to ignore the Iran war. It's not like it was a big discussion.

It's not like it was a contentious sort of thing. They just wanted to avoid it because they know it

doesn't play well because they know it's ridiculous and because they know any attempt for them to justify

the actions that they're taking are going to be met with widespread scorn. The videos will probably

go viral and they'll be humiliated as a result. So they'd rather just not talk about it,

which is proof that they know just as well as you and I do that the Iran war is a bad thing and

it's bad for the Republican Party. I mean, if they actually thought it was a good thing,

they'd be celebrating it. They'd be talking about it constantly. It'd be a main fixture of

the conversation during CPAC. It wasn't because it's bad in every possible way.

So all these people that got us into the war that made the arguments in favor of the war that

called for Tucker Carlson to be killed because he's not for the war. People like Josh Hammer,

allegedly, I should say, I'm sorry, people who said he should be treated like a fox in the

hen house because of his opposition to the Iran war. Shot with a shotgun, I guess would be the

answer. They didn't make the Iran war a big part of their speeches, did they? They didn't go out

there and say, you're welcome for getting you into this war. You're welcome for supporting

this American imperialism that benefits all of you great people. They didn't bring it up because

they know everybody hates it. You think everyone's got a cent of the war. They should be proud of it.

They should go out there and give speeches about what a good thing it is, how hard they work to

get a cent of this war. We know already. I mean, we saw you working continuously trying to get

this war. Now you don't bring it up. Now you don't want to talk about it. Now you don't want to

mention it. Now you just want to call people names like a leftist. All right.

Matt Gaetz, the former congressman from Florida, offered one of the loudest moments of descent from

Mr. Trump and the events official proceedings saying, quote, a ground invasion of Iran will make

our country poorer and less safe. Said Mr. Gaetz, who's now the host of a nightly show on the

conservative one American network. It will mean higher gas prices, higher food prices,

and I'm not sure if we would end up killing more tourists than we would create.

That speech, though, drew a muted response from the crowd and some remained frustrated.

These conversations are not happening here. It said Samantha Kasele, a 27-year-old Republican

strategist. She was wearing a fishback for Florida hat in support of the, quote, rage baiting

Florida candidate for governor, who's energized a coalition of young voters in that state,

saying there's no serious discussion going on. Like anybody reading this article,

it's impossible to ignore the glaring problems with the GOP. It's like, here's

we talked to a young supporter of Nick Fuentes, who's fired up and excited about Nick Fuentes and

says all the young people love Nick Fuentes. And then we watched some speeches from some old school

people and the response was muted and it was all kind of like embarrassing and cringey. And then

we talked to a fishback supporter and fishback is running an amazing campaign where he's firing

up people and getting hundreds of supporters in obscure locations like waffle houses. He's holding

in prompt to events that draw massive crowds and make headlines across the country. And we're

keeping him out. We're gatekeeping him with everything we've got because we don't want the youth

to be excited. We want the youth to be depressed, I guess. So we want to, we want to demoralize them

into thinking they have to support this war because so far there's no enthusiastic support. So just

demoralization to the point of helplessness. That's what they're going for now.

Feel free to hire me as a Republican strategist, Republicans. I have these brilliant insights like

people that draw young energy are the people you should be supporting, okay? 10 million dollars,

please. Is it like, is it not obvious? Is it not

readily apparent what the problem is and it ain't the young people. It ain't the young people,

it ain't the young, the youth movement. It's not the Nick Fuentes or James fishbacks out there

that do draw crowds that do inspire excitement and passion. The problem is in fact that

everybody else at the conference sees Nick Fuentes and James fishback as an existential threat

to their continued power and are doing everything they can to silence the most popular and

exciting people on the right. Am I saying things to you that you can't figure out for yourself?

Really. Among the young Republicans, there were cases of people expressing forms of cautious

optimism about the coming midterm elections and tentative support for the president's abrupt

choice to attack Iran, but these views were expressed for most part by attendees with professional

aspirations to work in GOP circles. Is that not tell you everything you need to know right there?

Everybody who is young, who even tentatively, they say moderately,

carefully expresses muted support for some of Trump's what he's doing, it's all because they want

jobs in the GOP power structure. So the GOP power structure is just diametrically opposed to what

the people who vote for the GOP want. And they have, it's like this understanding that if you want

to work in the GOP, if you want to move up the ranks of the Republican Party, if you want to

become a person of importance, in politics to do something for America, you first have to

submit to Israel. First, you have to abandon your principles, lie about what you believe,

it's like a shit test, it's like they're testing you. Will you lie for us? Will you say things

that you know are untrue because they serve our purpose? And if so, you may be welcomed in the ranks

of the scum. I mean, just really think about that. And it sucks because right-wingers just aren't

deceptive by nature because what could easily happen and Fuentes is doing this to a certain

degree where there are droopers, like everybody understands, you actually support Nick Fuentes,

you actually believe in what droopers believe or whatever, you have to hide that, you have to

disguise that, you have to conceal that. But like a lot of people aren't comfortable doing that,

I wouldn't be comfortable doing that. It's like each your soul away, like you would become a

different person. You did that day in, day out, having this like secret identity, it shouldn't be

necessary. And it's not, it doesn't, it doesn't comport itself with the fundamental morals of the

people who are expected to do this. So it would be easy if we were like the leftists who celebrate

the fact, like it's actually sort of their official plan now. The official Democrat plan is to go,

hey, let's run people who are pretending to be reasonable but are in fact radical communists.

It's like their official platform at this point. So they're happy to do this. They're fine doing

this. This is why the left always wins when it comes to, you know, you elect somebody that seems

like a moderate Democrat and they turn out to be a radical. It's because they're happy to play

the false part, to deceive, to lie about their true intentions. Republicans, right when you

don't really want to do that, if we did, it'd be easy to get into all these. It'd be so easy

to go up to any old boomer that runs an organization and go, I love Israel, I love America. You know,

I just, I just really think the Judeo Christian foundation of our country is collapsing and we have

to uphold it against the, the islamo fascist red-green alike. It wouldn't be hard at all to trick

these people and then get in and then operate behind the scenes. It's just we're not, you know,

morally aligned with that type of strategy. So we refuse to do it. And it's kind of an impossible

last to be like, hey, you're, you're a responsible, honest, truthful Christian young man. Well,

the way you need to get power is by becoming a liar and a deceiver and an undercover operator.

Who's betraying the people who hired you. It's like we don't want to do that. So we're kind of

screwed unless we have actual genuine like organizers, events that are willing to embrace the actual

mentality of the people on the ground and not just work tirelessly to silence or eradicate them,

like ostracize them completely. So I think it was a very good article

by New York Times of all places and it ends with a, you know, poignant but not exactly groundbreaking

conclusion. They say, you know, CPAC's attendees yearn for some of the TPSA energy. But of course,

TPSA was taken over by Israel. So that's not going to last any much longer. And the last,

you know, America's best was a complete disaster as well because they actually allowed some of the,

you know, dissidents to speak. And so it became a big, you know, argument between the power structure

that wants to silence everybody in the, you know, America first people that they're trying to silence.

Miss Kassel, this young woman, quote, I think MAGA is dying. She said, I do. Oh, good riddance.