WAR ROOM [3 of 3] Tuesday 3/31/26 • News, Reports & Analysis • Infowars

All right folks, Thomas Massey held a money bomb yesterday. Had a ton of great people contributing

to it. And he's come out with a statement today. He's got a clip number 32 here. This was,

I believe this was during the money bomb. This was about one of the things that the Trump

administration is desperately working on. So they haven't gotten any deep state actors. They

haven't gotten any justice for rush a gate or the rush a gate cover up or the bacon peachments

into Ukraine or the corruption around Ukraine or the COVID-19 2020 lockdown scandal. You know,

the vaccine poison. None of that's been handled at all. Obviously the 2020 election being stolen.

That hasn't been dealt with at all. But don't worry folks. They're working tirelessly to make

sure that the glyphosate producers can no longer be sued for the immense amounts of cancer that

they're giving to everybody. Let's go to clip 32 here. One of the things in the farm bill,

still trying to get out of it was successful in getting this out of prior bills is immunity

for a German company called Bayer that makes glyphosate. This is not to grant farmers immunity.

This is to grant the corporation immunity if they give farmers if farmers contract a form of

cancer or non-Hodgians lymphoma from this chemical. If this makes it into the farm bill,

it won't be able you won't be able to sue for that. Now, I know they're dealing with some

similar legislation at the state level. So that's what they're doing. That's what they're up to.

And of course Thomas Massey is tending up against that. And Thomas Massey ratioed the

White House significantly with this post. So the White House wrote this post that says only farms

only farms.com. Thomas Massey responds, can you arrest Epstein's co-conspirators instead of

riffing on a porn site? And yeah, he got about 10 times as many likes as the as the White House did

with not so much of as the reach that they have.

Again, I mean, you people can just pretend that you're on top. You can pretend that you're

the authorities. You can pretend that you're the popular ones. Nobody believes that except for you.

And so Dan Bungino goes back and forth with Massey. Long story short, Dan Bungino was mad that Thomas

Massey was blowing up the BS that the FBI was feeding us about the supposed pipe bomber.

And basically wanted to call Thomas Massey in to try to persuade him not to release

information that would embarrass the FBI. But the funniest part to me is just on every one of Dan

Bungino's. I don't know if it just happened to print out this way, but all of his posts for me include

the first most popular response to him. And everyone is just calling him out hilariously.

As Thomas Massey and him go back and forth, we're basically he's like,

Thomas Massey is just like destroying his points one by one. But then it's like, you know,

Dan Bungino, Thomas Massey is a shameless fraud. Thanks. Have a nice day. First comment from

Dan Blitz area, you're such a clown, Trashing Massey's confirmation of your treason. He says

something else about Thomas Massey. The first response says the guy who talked to big game,

but was completely bought by your big nose handlers as soon as you got into office from a former

supporter of Hugo F yourself. You let everybody but Israel down.

Dan Bungino tries to get creative with it. And it's like, did Thomas Massey ever accept the invite

to be briefed about the cases he's bloving and bloviating about? No, of course he didn't.

He prefers to rage bait and litigating criminal matters on X for clout. Ask him if you're bored.

He chose to be stupid. Fact 100 100 emoji. The first response to top response to that post is

quote, it's clear that you and your handlers are in a frenzy after seeing Massey's wildly successful

fundraiser yesterday. Meanwhile, you interviewed his puppet opponent who won't even agree to a

debate. This is Faga, which I think is kind of creative. Fake America again. Like fake America

grade again. Something like that. Faga. Bunch of. And finally, Dan Bungino says PS,

another other representatives who had questions took the brief. Not Massey. He prefers ignorance

in the top response to that quote. Did the pedophiles you protect take the brief? Did they take the

brief? Dan Bungino is the pedophile cronols that you are ruining your own reputation to protect.

Did they take the brief? That's why you love them so much.

We're not Maga. We're not Miga. We're Faga. Just a

couple of fat heads, I guess you'd call us. I have so many more videos to show you. I don't

even know if I'm going to have time to take calls this hour. I want you just sitting online waiting

for me to go to you. So we'll hold off on taking calls for a minute because I've got a lot of good

videos. That a lot of good videos. I also need to tell you about zero light, zero light detox

and defense available now at the Alex Jones store dot com, the Alex Jones store dot com slash

Harrison. If you want to let them know who sent you, it is a powerful liquid formula with

ultra fine zero light designed to help bind heavy metals and environmental toxins,

support your body's natural detox pathways and promote daily wellness. And right now if you

sign up for a subscription where you get zero light delivered monthly, you're getting 72% off

72% off this very, very powerful supplement. And you'll always get you'll always get delivered

even if we run out. Otherwise, we'll always save some for you. We're almost at the 1000 subscriber

limit. And once we hit that, the price jumps back up to the full price. But you're getting

72% off subscription price for zero light. And it just fits into the entire methodology here

at Info Wars. We've never been the doomers, right? You can find them. There's a lot of people out

there that will just tell you how hope is lost and everything's going down the world's going to

be destroyed. We tell you that is the intention. That's what they're trying desperately to do,

but that they have to contend with you and will and that if you organize and if you exert your

will and if you recognize that you are just as powerful as them, then we can defeat them and we

can win and we can embrace humanity and reach for the stars. We can actually do this stuff.

Same in the same way, like we'll tell you about the poison in the food and waters will also

give you water filters that deals with the problem. Because there's always been a true a two-track

response from Info Wars, the individual and the societal communal, right? We have to pass

laws to get things like fluoride out of our water. At the same time until that happens, you got to

be filtering your own. We want heavy metals out of our soil, heavy metals out of our air,

heavy metals out of our food and water. Until then, you might want to be taken zero light.

You got to do both these things. It's not one or the other and one is not sufficient,

but you got to do at least one. Really, we should be doing both. We're not just telling you about

the environmental toxins that are poisoning us on purpose and by design with desired outcomes

of lowering testosterone, lowering fertility, creating a helpless class of the disabled who

owes no threat to those in power. We have to get that stuff out at the same time until that

happens. You're still being poisoned and you still got to do something about it.

So I know this is a product. I've looked for a similar product like this. Could you hear about

all the heavy metals? You're like, if you have something I can do, well, zero light is the detox

program that you need. Incredible absorption. It's got a very advanced binding agent and can help

you detox in the way that the modern world calls for. Go to the Alex Jones store.com slash

Harrison if you want to let them know who sent you. And of course, go now to get the 72% off once

we're out of that initial stock that sale is going to end. So it's still going on now as far as we

know. Go make the order if you can. Now, like I said, I've got some longer videos to show you.

Let's start with should we reset? Should we do a little reset for the third hour? Have some fun.

Let's go to clip number 38. There was a very interesting occurrence over the weekend.

We haven't even talked about the No Kings rally. And it was kind of bizarre. You would think one

would surmise that if you really were against Trump, you've been holding these No Kings

rallies over and over. Sometimes they're bigger, sometimes they're smaller, but you've got this

big one coming up. And on the approach to the No Kings rally, Trump goes to war with Iran and

it's hugely unpopular and people hate it and they're infuriated by it.

If you're the organizer of the No Kings rally, do you not make it into an anti-Iran war rally?

Do you not say, hey guys, if you're against this war, you got to come to the No Kings rally because

that's where we're standing up against. King Trump thinks he can get us into a war anywhere overseas.

And we just have to go along with it. We're standing up and telling him, no, wouldn't you take that

tack? This is the two party control system I'm talking about. The Republicans know perfectly well

what they should do if they wanted to be elected, if they wanted to inspire their base,

capture the youth. They know what they need to do. They won't do it because it's contrary to

what their actual goals are. Same thing with the Democrats. If they wanted the No Kings rally to be

the biggest event in the history of America, they would have said, this is an anti-Iran war rally

and they would have had, I would have gone. It would have had a lot of people who went.

Now because we believe in what the No Kings people believe, they're all radical left as socialist

morons, but they're also in favor of the war in Iran. I would have gone if they'd been against

the war in Iran, but they aren't. Now they're for it. They're in favor of it.

Isn't that kind of weird? Doesn't that seem kind of strange to you?

They wouldn't take this massive vulnerability that Trump has now exposed himself to,

and you don't take that opportunity.

Because to them, if there was the two-button option and they could hit, you know,

get rid of Trump and have a socialist utopia or make Israel a superpower, they hit that last

button. That's the one they actually care about. Using leftist outrage about Trump is a convenient

way to gain power to achieve that ultimate goal. Totally bad odds and possibly

I'm actually opposed to what the left is actually believe, but it doesn't matter to them.

It's the path to power. That's what they're going to use and achieve. So we got some videos

from the No Kings protest. Again, it could have been big. It could have been incredible. It could

have been really a monumental thing. It wasn't, though, because the people controlling it are

essentially leftist Neocons. It's really the way to think about them. They are the left wing

of the Neocons, which is to say they're Neocons because the Neocons are left wing too. Let's go

to clip 38 here. This was a brilliant interaction between a troll and I guess another troll. Let's watch.

Isn't it a little bit homophobic that was so focused on the streets of Humus and not the

gates of Humus? Yes, I agree. Yes, for sure. Why do you think they're willing to leave the

gates of Humus behind? I think it's just history historically, like, you know, gates have always

been very discriminated against, which is wrong and so many levels. Even in war? Yeah, even in war.

It just takes more reform in government, obviously, and then also educating society.

Just feel like if we're going to go inside, we can't leave the gate. I don't think we should

go inside at all, but if we're going to the gates of Humus, we could turn it into fire island.

For sure.

Down to any leftist that may have been mistakenly watching me right now, that's what you all

sound like to us all the time, just so you know, just so you're aware. Like, I know because

it was the straight of four moves and the gates of Humus, it's kind of an obvious

plan. Words that was designed to troll her and make her look stupid, but that's

she's about as on the ball as any of you people on any topic, really. So I just want you to understand

like that's how we see all of you all of the time. All right, that was not a unique,

uniquely embarrassing moment. That's what all of your beliefs essentially boil down to is like,

yeah, why can't Carg Island be the new fire island? Like, what are you even talking about?

What are we saying here? You people are off the reservation and yet

extremely confident in your beliefs, which is a very, very dangerous combination.

And I want to go to clip 23 here. This seems real to me. I can't, I kind of don't believe that it's

real. I don't think it's real, but it's very funny and it's very well done. And it almost seems

real. Let's go to clip 23 here. Just before we get into the real hellish nuclear war stuff,

let's laugh a little bit more at this person trying to outwoke their HR person at work. Let's watch.

Behind that, like the proud activist Lizzo, she like worked tirelessly to like kind of like

de-platformize that word. Yeah, so yeah, so maybe use like substantial.

But yeah, just circling back to this. I don't know if you can use the shape circle.

It's again like triggering to a lot of, you know, people like even like, come on, like people

aren't shapes. Like, let's not use shapes. Let's abandon shapes. You're right. Yeah. You're teaching

me things every single day. Well, thank you so much. But yeah, I also wanted to say, um, thank you

for like seeing this and you know, overlooking this. Oh, I don't know if you can use overlooking

because, you know, again, back to the whole blind people, like they don't really, like they don't

like less appropriating, you know, they want to be respectful. Yeah, yeah, using that terminology.

I'm gonna keep this in mind and yeah, thank you so much. Thank you. So can I go back to my lunch now?

Yeah, it's okay. Thank you for having me.

I don't know if it's real, but it's very convincing. It's very realistic. If nothing else,

and it's just like, yeah, this is y'all's ideology, man. And look, if you want to get man handled

by a NYPD cop, there's easier ways to do it than dressing up like Lady Liberty, okay? There's

easier ways to fulfill your, your deep, deep desire to be man handled by an Aryan, but whatever you

got to do, whatever you got to do, Lady. All right. Well, that's enough fun. Should we get into the

horror? Should we get into the hellish horror of the real world? I'm gonna clip 31 here, Colorado.

I started out to be one of the most disappointing states in my lifetime. Used to be, used to be kind

of great actually, used to be almost entirely conservative, except for little pockets of the elite

in places like Aspen. Not so much anymore. I think it all went downhill when they legalized

weed, to be honest with you, but of course, you can't legalize weed without being infected in the

first place. It's basically California 2.0 at this point, which is very sad. It's gonna clip 31.

They have just passed a new law or trying to pass a new law to take your children away for

a pretty arbitrary reasons. Let's watch. Colorado's been in the news a lot, even today, with

a ruling out from the US Supreme Court saying the Colorado once again violated the free speech

and religious liberty rights of its citizens. Well, there's a bill that's gonna be heard in House

Committee today, HB26309, that if you're a parent, you need to listen to this, you need to know

what is being considered by the state of Colorado to take away your rights with your child.

Now, this bill would specifically apply in situations where parents are getting custody of their

child. So, like, divorce proceedings or, you know, whatever a child custody agreement is being

re-looked at. So, this doesn't apply right now to every single parent out there. You would actually

have to be in a custody type situation. But, since a lot of parents do find themselves in those

situations, this bill is very, very threatening to parental rights. And I would argue, as an attorney

myself, unconstitutional as written. But you need to know about it. Here's what it does. It gives a

very broad definition of coercive control. And it makes coercive control fit under the definition

of domestic abuse or domestic violence in Colorado. And what this law says is that if you have committed

domestic violence, then there's gonna be a presumption that you should not see your kids and you

should not get custody of your children. In some order to find whether or not you've committed

domestic violence against your child, they look at this broad definition of coercive control.

So, I'm gonna read part of it to you. The first part is fine. It's talking about actual abuse.

But then it gets into the bad part. Coursive control, and I'm quoting now, includes a pattern of

behavior that takes away the individual's liberty or freedom, and strips away the individual's

sense of self, including the individual's bodily integrity and human rights. Course of control

includes isolating the individual from support, exploiting the individual, depriving the individual

of independence, and regulating the individual's everyday behavior. And then it actually goes on

and gives an entire long list of other things that could be considered coercive control.

Now, here's the problem. That's an extremely broad definition. Think about as a parent,

if you are depriving your child of independence, what does that mean? That could literally mean

you are tracking your child through the Find My Phone app, and you're tracking their location to

make sure they are where they told you they would be, or that they are at a safe place where you

drop them off for sports, or for a class. It could also mean if you have supervision over your child's

banking account, and they're a minor, so you can actually shut off their access to their funds,

because maybe they're spending it irresponsibly, or it's part of a grounding punishment that you've

given them. Well, that is depriving them of independence. Regulating the individual's everyday behavior,

I mean, come on, what parents actually do. Of course, we regulate our child's everyday behavior.

We tell them they have to go to school, but that's, you know, infringing on their independence.

We tell them which friends are good for them and which aren't, because that's our responsibility

as a parent. It is not domestic violence. And so, in addition to the fact that this is so broad,

it could literally take a child away from any parent in a custody situation for any reason,

whatsoever. It also removes the seriousness of actual domestic violence where children are

actually being abused and should not be put with that parent. This degrades and takes away the

seriousness of real offenses like that. One of the other things that it defines as course of control

is, quote, monitoring, surveilling, regulating, or controlling the individuals,

activities, communications, or movements, including through technology. So that's where you get the

using apps to track your child's location, or also, you know, their finances telling them what they

can spend money on and what they can't. There's also parts of this bill that would prohibit a

parent from stopping their child from transitioning into a different gender or taking medications.

It would also prevent a dad from discouraging, you know, his daughter from having an abortion.

Like, there's so many limitations on what a parent can even say to their child or help them in

their lives or act in their best interest. This is a terrible bill. It absolutely needs to be shut down.

And of course, there's, I mean, she lays out there and I don't, there's no argument against this.

I mean, the only reason you would promote something like this is because you're trying to

basically capture ideological control of young people. It's absolutely the only reason.

Because it'll never, it'll never go the other way, right? And this

comes into things like the Supreme Court decision yesterday, where actually, surprisingly,

it was an eight to one decision, Kentucky Brown Jackson, again, of course, the only dissenting voice.

It really seems like she doesn't understand her role as a Supreme Court judge. Honestly,

it seems like she thinks that it's just her opinion that they're asking for.

The point of the Supreme Court, it's the point of appointing people to the Supreme Court.

There's supposed to be unbiased arbiters of the law. They're supposed to just look at the law

and decide what the law says. It's not supposed to have anything to do with their personal

proclivities. I genuinely don't know if Kentucky Brown Jackson knows that.

Because she seems to be answering all of the questions put to the Supreme Court,

just with her own personal perspective, her own personal opinion.

We don't care if you think that there should be conversion therapy. The question is,

is it legal or is the law banning it violating the First Amendment? I really don't think

she understands that that's the case. And I don't think leftists understand this either.

They don't really seem to have much grasp of the rule of law, what that actually means.

But it's obvious that bands against conversion therapy are not constitutional

because you don't ban them the other way. Explain this literally for years.

But it's really not that complicated. They're banning, quote-unquote, conversion therapy,

which actually means anybody just trying to counsel young people about their sexuality

and trying to get them to conform their sexual activity in line with a more responsible or, you know,

decent, honorable sort of way. Or however you perceive that.

While at the same time, they're like putting into the class plan deliberate indoctrination

into an LGBTQ lifestyle. So you can ban both or you can ban neither.

But if you're just banning one and enforcing the other,

then all you're doing is establishing essentially a state religion, an ideology that's pushed

by the state. And if you oppose that ideology, you're to be punished and the state is supposed to

like clamp down that expression. Obviously, that's out of lines of the First Amendment.

Everybody except for Kintanji Brown-Jackson on the Supreme Court recognized that and decided

correctly. So the Supreme Court ruled eight to one against a Colorado law banning conversion

therapy for LGBTQ minors, finding that it violates the First Amendment. Kintanji Brown-Jackson

was the lone dissenter. I don't think anybody has explained to her what her actual job is yet.

And that gets us to things like what happened to this Chicago Bulls player

who has been removed from the team because of his outrageous statements. And it was funny because

I was reading about this for a while before I ever actually saw the video. I don't know if

if y'all have seen this video. But I was expecting something. I think I was expecting something else.

For Chicago Bulls, Christianity is a fireable offense, but not drugs or resisting arrest.

I mean, the NBA is replete. I mean, it's full of people. It's like the most outrageous criminals

you can imagine. They're a rapist. I actually saw a post by an NBA player condemning this guy,

Jaden. The guy making the post had been in a scandal like two years ago because he was dating

an underage girl. So you have like literal pedophiles, literal like statutory rapists,

actual rapists, domestic, you know, violence committers. That's all fine. But this guy,

this Jaden character, he took it too far and the Chicago Bulls, they just can't stand for that.

Now let's go to a good clip 12 here. Let's see what this guy has to say about his mic

rabble, I guess. Let's watch. Traveon quoted some Bible verses supporting a Chicago Bulls player

who got released for some comments that he made. And I just said, how do you measure the line

between conduct detrimental to the team, which is why the Bulls released the player in their view

and allowing the 23 year old to express his personal feelings? I think there is a fine line. I want

to tell you, I love Traveon. I love the person. He cares deeply about our team. He cares deeply

about his faith. He cares deeply about his family, his wife, the people in our building.

And so I want them to be able to express what they believe in their heart and in their mind.

But also want to make sure that they're educated and we want to be inclusive. We want to,

everything we want to do wants to provide an environment for people to want to feel comfortable,

but also to share their personal beliefs. And then also we represent the team and we represent

the organization. Yeah, totally. So that's why you fired the guy for expressing himself.

Yeah, you know, you just, you just fired a guy for, and I'll show you the clip on the other side,

we got to go commercial break. But like this is so, I feel like it's so emblematic of the modern

world where they're like, you fired somebody for expressing a very boilerplate religious belief.

You fired somebody for merely stating essentially that they're a Christian. And the response is,

yeah, because we want to be inclusive. Okay, cool. Do you understand? That's all you need to know.

Why'd you fire the Christian? Oh, because we want to be inclusive of everybody. We want everybody

to feel comfortable expressing themselves. So we fired the guy who expressed himself.

Wait to hear what the guy actually said. We got fired for it. Bullard mine.

Yes, folks, the Chicago Bulls fired a player. We're expressing his Christian opposition to

participating in an LGBTQ program. And so they fired him because they care so much about inclusivity.

They care so much about inclusivity. They're firing people that disagree with them. Maybe

have a different perspective. See, you have to wear the Black Lives Matter jersey. You have to

wear the rainbow jersey. You have to celebrate pride. And if not, you're not being inclusive.

Everybody has to agree on this. Anybody that doesn't isn't being inclusive and will be excluded.

Okay. Just, just laying out how little sense this makes on the face of it. But obviously,

they don't care about inclusion. I don't know if I need to tell you this. They don't care about

inclusion. They care about submission. They care about cohesion. Pushing their beliefs,

pushing their morality, their mentality, their moral system on everybody else. And if you oppose it,

you're the bad guy because you're not being inclusive. I don't think I need to hammer that home.

I think it's just should be obvious to everybody. And this is kind of the frustration. I feel on

a daily basis. Everything our enemies believe is self-contradictory. And it's absurd that I even

have to explain it. And it makes me feel crazy because of all the people online that are like

either pretending to go along with this or genuinely don't have the IQ to figure out that it's

incoherent. And then obviously lie stories at Info Wars. Jaden Ivy, a former player of the NBA's

Chicago Bulls, was let go by the team on Monday. After he criticized the league's pride month

celebrations as unrighteous, according to his Christian faith. Again, like I said, it's like I got

fired. Nobody's really standing up for him. Like there are some, you know, the headline from Info

Wars is Christian athletes come to defense of NBA player, fired for criticizing leagues pride month

events. But not really. Like his teammates have all kind of made these like half-ass statements

where they're like, well, he feels really strongly about what he believes. But like, you know,

I can't really say much more. It's just like you pathetic cowards. All these people are just

slaves. They're all just willing slaves. The Chicago Bulls announced on Monday in a Monday

statement. The quote team has waved guard Jaden Ivy due to conduct detrimental to the team.

And beat his wife. He'd be, you know, first pick. He didn't rape anybody. That'd be covered up,

right? He's not like LeBron James, who published after a, after a girl, a black girl was almost killed

by another black girl with a knife, only for the attack to be halted. The moments before

was able to be carried out by a white cop. He posted a picture of that white cop saying, you're next.

So, okay, LeBron James can blatantly threaten an American cop for doing his job and saving

the life of a black woman. You know, again, did nothing make sense in any of this. But

this is what happens when you have no shared morals, no, you know, widely understood,

established, you know, basis of morality, your next accountability. Now, I'm pretty sure,

if I'm not mistaken, scroll down a little bit. I'm pretty sure this was the cop. Y'all remember

this. It was one of the craziest events. It was right after George Floyd. I think it was in the same

like area as George Floyd, like, you know, Minneapolis somewhere around there. And there was a

video that the body cam footage came out there, at least a really quick because basically,

a black girl had been shot by police. And I was like, oh my God, another one, another black girl

shot by police. Oh my God. And then they released the body cam footage. And it was literally like

an action movie, like, you know, those action movie moments where like the bad guy, like,

pulls back the knife and is about to stab. And then the good guy shoots him in the chest. And he,

like, you know, it's like, it was like that close. Like literally, this girl has a knife.

She's pulling it back and stabbing at another girl about to like kill that other girl.

And the cops shooter literally in the last microsecond they could have saved the other girl's life,

put down the threat. LeBron James gets on line, shows a picture of the hero cop and says,

you're next. Because they wanted to send him to prison for five years, like they did to the guy,

the police officer that was standing near Derek Chauvin, the Asian guy. That was a crazy time.

And that was a crazy instance. It was literally, it was like, you can debate certain, you know,

did he overdose? I mean, you know, I think we all know the answer, but at least there was some

wiggle room, some debate there. But that, the event of the stabbing, I mean, it was literally

his girl had a knife lunging at the other girl and she gets shot and people still wanted to

pretend like this was a, you know, unwarranted shooting. Crazy. So, but that's fine. That's fine.

LeBron James couldn't literally threaten the life of a cop who just saved the life of a black girl.

That's all fine and good. And he's the best in the hero and, you know, he'll be on all of the

serial boxes. But Jayden Ivy, he went too far. He went too far and he said stuff that just the,

you know, it would bring down the Chicago Bulls completely. Is this it? The crew found it?

Do you all remember this video? Let's see if it says, it's if it's, if it is as perfect as I remember.

And if this is the right one, because the one I remember, I mean, you can literally see her with

the knife about to stab when she gets shot. I'm not sure if this is it. Is this it?

Maybe I can't say it on the, my screen's not exactly right.

Yeah. And Ohio Police Officer was cleared in the shooting of Teen Andrew McCuyah Bryant.

You know, cleared the instant that it happened because it was on video. Yeah, there it is. Yeah,

there's the knife. She's got the knife. She's about to stab this girl in the pink, right?

With a knife, I don't know if you've ever been stabbed by a knife before, but it hurts.

It can kill you very easily. So what should this cop have done? Allow it to happen.

So he's not racist. Come on, ridiculous. Okay, this is all background. Just a little reminder,

a case you need to remember how special needs this whole thing has been the whole time.

So apparently he's put out a couple of videos, but I don't think this is, I don't think any of them are,

you know, worse than the one I'm about to show you. So you know, just be warned. Okay.

Be warned. I know the NBA, literally famous for being the most like degenerates come back

in the world. But finally, one of them has gone too far. We're going to go to Club 19 here.

I don't want to sarcastically say it because sometimes I really do sell you like,

hey, parental warning. You don't want to watch this. I was going to say it jokingly because

there's absolutely nothing even remotely offensive about what you're about to see.

But I was going to play it up like that, but I'm not going to do that. Sometimes I really do tell you,

like, hey, parent discretion advice advised. This is not one of those cases, but like,

that's how they want you to think of it. They want you to think that what you're about to see

is something that like if the Chicago Bulls were to be associated with something like this,

I mean, my God. They'd stop selling uniforms or stop selling merchandise.

The stadium would be empty. I mean, if it was known that Chicago Bulls have this type of mindset.

I mean, how could they survive as an organization? They had to fire this guy for the, you know,

stability of the whole team. Let's go to Club Number 19. This is the just incredibly offensive

way over the line stuff that this homophobic moron said. Let's watch.

The world can proclaim LGBTQ.

Right. They have, they have, they proclaim Pride Month and the NBA.

They proclaim it. They show it to the world. They say, come, come, come join us for pride,

for pride month, to celebrate unrighteousness. They proclaim it.

They proclaim it on the billboards. They proclaim it in the streets. Unrighteousness.

So how is it that one can't speak righteousness? How is it one that, how are they to say that,

uh, you, you, man, this man is crazy. I'm not, I'm not the, the jail used to be, but the OJS did.

I'm not gonna cross, no matter what, the basketball setting is, you know, I'm born again,

the Holy Spirit. I've been saved by Jesus Christ. No matter what, how many DNPs I don't, I don't

get to play or, uh, no matter how many points I score, those things are a temporary thing.

So there you go. Riley Gaines, we live in a world that hates Christ and those who believe in him,

but that's to be expected, just as he was persecuted. So we will be, consider me a Jayden Ivy fan.

Jayden Ivy reposted that. So that was it. That was the video.

Uh, he literally just called pride unrighteous. A couple of things about this. For one,

I can pretty much guarantee you at least half of the players in the NBA totally agree with that.

At least, at least half the players on his team, if you were to get him in the locker room,

but what do you think about Gaines? You'd hear some stuff, right?

I guarantee you. I mean, if you ever talk to black people, I mean, it's like,

it's a weird kind of thing because they actually have a higher percentage number of LGBT members

in the black community, but they also are like way more hardcore about not being LGBTQ.

I don't know. This is a cultural thing you may not be aware of.

So it's ridiculous to act like this is a unique point of view. I mean, they're not even trying

to like claim it's hateful, but that's only because they can't because he didn't actually say

anything. He literally said it was unrighteous, which the funny thing is if you ask the pride

people ask, you know, people they're out there on Pride Parades, ask if what they're doing is

righteous in the conception that a Christian would have. They all know it's unrighteous.

They're not there pretending that this is a righteous. They know what they're doing.

This is ridiculous. Yeah, Chicago Bulls host Pride Night in partnership with BMO Harris Bank.

All right, so this guy was fired for being for literally being a Christian. And then

like all this teammate you're like, I hope he gets the help he needs.

The help he needs, the help he needs is his teammates not throwing a bunch of the bus.

The help that he needs is for his teammates to say, hey, you're going to fire him. I think what

he thought fire me too. If literally one other person from the team said that, it would probably

have a major effect. If two people said it, they'd have to really think about it.

They'd have to really think this worth losing three of our best players, but they're all cowards.

They're all absolutely pathetic cowards, honestly. I don't, I can't

possibly fathom the level of sort of quizzling fear these guys operate in.

You know, God bless Jade and Ivy for standing up against it. But then to act like this guy's

crazy, he's crazy. He's on well. He needs help. That's the

psychiatric vocabulary coming into play. As if you recognizing the clear misalignment between

the LGBTQ lifestyle in general, wholesome, you know, positive, productive family structures,

you have to be, you must be crazy. You must be insane.

Probably shock therapy. You might need medication. That's where this is going. But there's

another thing. The video that we saw in the last segment of the coach, basically saying, yeah,

look, you know, he needs, he needs to get help. And what he actually said is, we want to be

inclusive. Okay, but you just fired the guy first saying his belief. But we want people he says

to be informed and to be like educated on this stuff. And I'm explaining this many times too.

This is the psychological manipulation behind things like homophobia or Islamophobia. They say

it's a phobia because phobia implies fear, fear implies ignorance. You're afraid of things you

don't understand. You're afraid of things that you know are out there, but you don't know what it

is, right? You're afraid of the dark because you don't know what could be in the dark.

So if you're afraid of homosexuality, must be because you're uneducated, you're uninformed.

It's setting up a paradigm, a false paradigm, a false dichotomy that says you're either educated

and informed and you understand homosexuality and you are therefore in favor of it or

you're ignorant, you're naive and hateful. And that's why you're against it.

The false dichotomy precludes the position that Jade Nivey's in in which he understands homosexuality.

He gets homosexuality. He's not afraid of homosexuality, but he's not in favor of it.

In their world construction, you can't not be in favor of it and understand it. If you're not in

favor of it, it must be because you haven't been educated enough. And what they mean by that is

you haven't been educated enough to understand that you need to sublimate your own beliefs

under the demands of the corporation. That's all the other players understand.

Like I said, all the other players ask them, hook them up to a lie detector. I guarantee you,

at least half of them agree with Ivy. What they don't understand is that they need to shut up

about that, keep their job. I guess they do understand that. They understand that they need to

not express themselves. They want to keep their job. See, there's so much smarter than Ivy,

the idiot who actually says what he believes and stands up against the deliberate destruction

of our moral foundation here in America. So he's great. Everybody else in the NBA is absolute trash.

They're all quizzling cowards or just anti-Christ owners of the organizations who trade black people

like slaves and have no respect for them and demand they keep themselves silent for the continuation

of the destruction of the Western world. Now, speaking of the destruction of the Western world,

a lot of people are looking at the situation in Iran and recognizing that we are in

very dangerous landscape for the use of nuclear weapons. And we seem to be racing towards

a catastrophe in which nuclear weapons would be a very easy,

you know, final solution for like a better word for the people that have embroiled us in this.

So how would this come about? How would this happen? And how would we prevent it? Well,

the good news is that all of the bad guys are actually good guys. It turns out

and may actually rein in the real bad guys who control our country and Israel and are in fact one

in the same. Let's go to clip number 36 and 37. We'll play both these back-to-back because this

is Volodymyr Zelensky talking about Israel and his, again, it's just like you cannot find

him more comically evil villain than little rat Zelensky with his Disney villain voice. You'll hear

it here. It seems like he is making an offer to Israel because Ukraine has a lot of experience

in drone warfare over the last couple of years. And he's offering a deal to Israel.

Zelensky touched the wall, are we surprised? Are we surprised? He has literally surrounded

by Israeli criminals. Like his entire cabinet literally got caught stealing $100 million

and fled to Israel. All like four or five of them. The Ukraine war is being waged by a faction

of Israelis, just a war aware. And it's probably all in service of what's happening in Iran anyway,

if you really get right down to it, or at least the sex trafficking that takes place on a industrial

scale from Ukraine and other Eastern European countries into Israel. Look into that if you have

spare time and want to throw up. So this seems like Zelensky at crux of Ukrainian corruption case

said to a fled Israel. That's one of them. There's like at least three I can think of. But regardless,

he seems to be in negotiations in a way with Israel, perhaps a quid pro quo situation,

he'll help Israel defeat Iran's drones in exchange for nuclear weapons. You tell me if you think

that's what he's hinting at in these interview clips.

We gave several signals to Israel from the beginning of this war, we had big

deficit with some things. We need them. We still need them. It's such history is never enough.

So I don't know. Maybe maybe there's something else that I need. I have what he needs. He has

what I need. So you're going to offer to help him with the drone warfare in exchange you want

a nuke to go after Russia. He's been trying to get a nuke for a while. They really want

to obliterate Russia completely because it's a Christian nation of white people that's not going

along with the suicide of the Western nations. So what happens if Zelensky gets his hands on a nuke

or these rallies decide to go nuclear or help America might decide to use a nuke because

I don't know. Mark Levin talks to Trump for 30 minutes. It's like what would happen in that

situation? Well, an official, supposedly official from China has come out to say that

and no one's certain terms. If Israel uses a nuke, China will get involved. Let's just say that.

Good to click 25 here. Again, this is a supposedly Chinese official in the Communist Party

responding to the question about nuclear war in the Middle East. Click 25.

First of all, I want to tell the Israeli government and the Israeli leaders that the moment Israel

uses a nuclear warhead against any other country, including against Iran, it will be the

device of Israel as a country, as a state.

To my response, it's like, why wait, man? Why wait? You're going to let them do a nuke first?

Have you seen what they've done in Gaza? Have you seen what they're doing in Lebanon?

Nobody would be mad at you. I mean, some people would, but they'd be radioactive dust. So

I don't know why wait. I think like this is just the strange thing.

Our government, despite ostensibly saying all the right things to get elected, we elected them.

They endlessly serve foreigners and opponents to us and bending over backwards. They can't even

denaturalize or deport Kilmar Obrego Garcia of all people. We just can't get anything done.

Not all. What we are doing is destroying the first amendment because of anti-Semitism,

where deporting people on the basis of their support or lack of support for Israel,

we're going to war in Iran for like at the same time, giving all of government control over

to Palantir. As now the Pentagon is on a Palantir platform, the IRS just asked Palantir to join.

So all of the worst parts of our government are all now being platformed on to Palantir.

Like everything the American government is doing, everything the Israeli government is doing is

diametrically opposed to everything I want to happen.

And is in just abject opposition to everything I think should be going on.

Meanwhile, Iran is saying they're going to bomb Oracle and Palantir databases. China is saying

if Israel uses a nuclear weapon, we're going to eradicate them. Like, what's going on here?

What's going on? I'm not a communist. I'm not a radical Muslim. But our countries have been taken

over by a fanatical death cult. And we're the bad guys at the end of the day.

And the sad thing is there are European countries that are standing up against this,

but like I said, they're all the worst. So like, I don't know what we have to do

to bridge this gap. I've got stories today. I mean,

Maloney, the Italian Prime Minister has basically said we're going to sanction Israel.

This is absolutely unacceptable, it's happening in Lebanon. France has said they're not cooperating

with Israel anymore. They're not getting any weapons from them. They're sanctioning them.

Spain has gone farther than just about anybody. Now, all of these countries making these

statements are also engaged in the suicidal behavior that the left demands, the climate change

crap, the anti-white people crap. You have stuff like this. Mark Karney of all people,

Mark Karney, Prime Minister of Canada, former Bank of England scumbag architect of the lockdown

for COVID, Karney condemns Israel's illegal invasion of Lebanon as Operation Expans.

Like, all I want is somebody and just tell me if this is possible, a politician out there,

there's got to be a couple out there that can both oppose the vicious and brutal dehumanization

and ethnic cleansing carried out by Israel and is also not fanatically engaged in globalization

and eradicating the white race and destroying quote unquote capitalism so they can install communism.

Like, can we have both of these? Is this impossible? It's like, okay, they'll be against Israel,

but they're retarded socialists that want to destroy the country that they rule, okay? Great.

Or, hey, they're a patriot, they love America, but actually everything they ever do is dedicated

entirely to Israel and it's like, how did these two things become the options and how do we bridge

this gap or destroy this paradigm? Because it's unsustainable.