WAR ROOM LIVE [1 of 3] Friday 9/4/26 • LINDSAY CLANCY MISTRIAL, News, Reports & Analysis • Alex Jones Network
About this episode
![]()
Be sure to share the link!
CHECK OUT THE EXCLUSIVE COLLECTION
https://thealexjonesstore.com/Ron
ALEX JONES NETWORK LINKS
• alexjonesAPP.com
• https://www.alexjoneslive.com
• https://thealexjonesstore.com/Ron
• https://drjonesnaturals.com
• Follow @RealAlexJones on X
• Follow @AJNlive on X
• https://alexjonesgame.com
To Help Support The RonGibsonChannel
STRIPE is a secure payment processor (NO ACCOUNT REQUIRED)
Easy and Simple To Use
https://buy.stripe.com/9AQbMqg6fgfS3FS4gg
Thank You, Ron
• All RonGibsonChannel Links In One Place
• https://bio.link/rongibsonchannel
*** Direct Full Show Links - VIDEO or MP3 ***
https://allmylinks.com/rongibsonchannel
#news #politics #AlexJones #RonGibson
Get every episode summarized
Each time Alex Jones and Infowars Shows Commercial Free - RonGibsonChannel on Odysee publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
479 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Alex Jones and Infowars Shows Commercial Free - RonGibsonChannel on Odysee — WAR ROOM LIVE [1 of 3] Friday 9/4/26 • LINDSAY CLANCY MISTRIAL, News, Reports & Analysis • Alex Jones Network. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Welcome ladies and gentlemen to War Room Live Friday edition. I'm your host Harrison Smith coming to you live from the Alex Jones Network studios. Share the link Alex Jones live dot com. Follow me on ex on my hair. So Nate Smith follow at AJ and live. Please do share those links. Like comment. It really does help with the algorithm. We're very excited to be here today. We've got a lot of news. I'm going to be joined in the next hour by Viva Fry. Lawyer is going to help me break down exactly what is happening with Lindsey Clancy and we'll probably get into a bunch of other topics as well. A mistrial has been declared in the Lindsey Clancy trial. The killer mom is going to remain in custody and they'll probably retry the case later, but again, we'll save that for the next hour when Viva joins us. And I want to begin today since it's Friday, you know, it's the end of the week yet another week of chaos and
criminality and misery and everything else. Bad under the sun. So we're going to do so I want to be more uplifting. So we're going to show some some good stuff to start us off. And this video really is something to be hold. I consider it beautiful to tell you the truth. If I could find it, if I could tell you which one it is. But this is one of the sort of more subtle effects and I got to give Donald Trump credit for this clip 36. This guy went, it was basically kicked off of food stamps and low and behold, it improved his life. I really think this is something we you say like we speak and say this all we want until somebody actually experiences it you know, who's going to believe us? The idea that like no giving you things is actually bad for you. Getting things without earning it doesn't actually help you. It's actually a you know, set of golden handcuffs. It's a present for you. Put it around your neck, you know, like a leash.
Let's go to clip 36 here. You got to give credit to Trump for this and hopefully this type of transformation is happening all over the country as people whether they like it or not are being forced to recognize how powerful they truly are. Let's watch. It's been about four months since I've been living without no food stamps been having to pay cash at the market. I mean, doing the shopping and whatever. This ain't no shade to nobody. Don't get any fillers at start. I mean, getting your panties in a bunch of the comments. This is just y'all. Notice my personal journal. This is G. B. Z's journal. I'm talking about my where I've recognized down that I've been paying cash at the market these last four months. I used to think that I would be struggling if we didn't have food stamps. Even in my previous relationship with my daughter's mom, we used to be for England, for lessons, for Germany, trying to run one, two to be able to even get food stamps. And I've been living a life of carmic retribution. Meaning I'm putting out what I want to receive in return. I'm very
fearful of doing anything backhanded or back doors on the street. I think I'm falling off that going me because I have been manifesting my reality. I haven't been doing those steam scams, no type of from a fashion. Now, that's the way. I've been going to the market, spending cash probably like $200 a week. I mean, to give the things that we need. But I'm recognizing that when I had food stamps, we were shopping, gluttonous. We was buying a bunch of ****. We really honestly didn't need. We were shopping with our eyes. I mean, just because. But now that we got to be on a strict budget and we just buy what we need to last or the week. Make sure we got a dinner food. It's like bro, we really don't need food stamps. I never need it. Now only did I never need. I was doubting my own power, my own power of being able to survive and accomplish things off my own hand thinking that I needed to be in fear for or even trying to
survive without ****. And it's like, I thought about that with the food stamps. But when it comes to government assistance and general. Stunts your growth. It definitely starts up. It starts up being the system being dependent upon government assessment. It takes away you believing in your own power to be able to take care of yourself and accomplish your goal. Do whatever **** for this life. But for much, I didn't even realize that it's been for a month since we haven't had ****. Now don't mind you. I can recognize that having the food stamps and being able to put that $500, $500, $800, I'm one that I've been spending at the market back into the house. So will definitely help go over towards other places. No doubt. But at the same time between time. But I just don't want to live. I want to live a certain lifestyle. Now at this age where I'm
speaking and living in the way that I want to find me in return. Breeze's journal on TikTok. Yeah, just absolutely incredible. Incredible stuff. He's literally just like I didn't know my own power. He literally has spent his whole life being dependent on the government, thinking he was getting the good end of the deal. When he says, you know, I realized now how gluttonous we were shopping, right? Just add you want it. Get it. Why not? It's not your money. It just goes on the government bill. Do it. You think your benefit. You're like, I could do whatever I want. I get to just not even think about it and buy things and I just get stuff myself. I mean, I don't think I can elaborate on what he said anymore that he did. But you see what I mean? Where it's like, we can kind of make this case. We can kind of be like, you know, spiritually. And in the long term, it's actually bad to give people subsidies. It's not helpful. It's not good. It's not good for them. It's not good for the system. That can just that can sound like an excuse.
That can sound like, you know, a lie just because I want to keep my money. But like, no, it actually is actually hugely damaging generation over generation of people being dependent, feeling that their help is feeling they couldn't survive without the help. I love it. I absolutely love it. Just guy saying the same thing. Who's that guy? And I recognize him. Just grocery vial. So, I love that. That was a very uplifting video that I saw this morning, which was like, you couldn't have, you couldn't have, you know, Thomas Seoul couldn't have scripted it better, folks. Milton Freeman could not have scripted it better. The poison pill of government assistance. And that is the reason. Like it's not an accident, right? Snap in section eight cost US taxpayers 138 billion dollars last year. And that's before Medicaid SSI and the rest. Food is expensive in part because 42 million people are buying groceries with a card somebody else funds. The damage is not
only the bill with tens of millions of people organize their mouth around a government check. They stop voting on a, on the country and start voting on the benefits. Borders crime and debt become background noise to the one question that matters to them. Who will keep the groceries and the rent vouchers flowing? Milton Freeman put it plainly. You cannot simultaneously have free immigration and a welfare state. Well, that's a whole, that's a whole other issue. The open border welfare state is just throwing gasoline on an already dangerous fire. So again, you know, I don't know. I, I, I feel like I don't know how to express the depth of like spiritual truth that we just, we just witness there. It's a type of thing that like we got to, we got to really internalize the consequences that were that were witnessing right here and understand that I mean, there are how many times have we talked about? American greatness right here.
Smelling out EBT with the snack cakes. Glutiny manifest. Good Lord. But I mean, you'd get this was the, this was the plan. How many times have I said the same, I always say the same thing that like for a hundred years between abject absolute, you're not allowed to learn to read slavery to basic parity with, you know, white America. In a hundred years, black people made incredible gains in a right as they, you know, she's looking around going, I think we did. I think we made it. I think, hey guys, can we be equal? Now I think we've kind of proven that where it's like, well, how about the government helps you the last couple of steps? We'll carry you over the finish line. It's just, just downhill ever since. And that's why that's why right there. The second and third which, uh, effects that come later. I really would like to stay with the fun stuff because most of the stuff is not fun at all. But on Fridays, I hate just like being a downer right before the weekend.
But I guess that's what we have to do. Although we do have a lot of good flock news. Like flocks being destroyed. A man claims to have taken down every flock camera in uh, Bernalillo, Bernalillo County, New Mexico moments before he was arrested. In a video shared on social media, Jeff on Martinez said he was on his way to drop off all the cameras at the local sheriff's office. He filmed a video of himself with a truck that, this truck that is full of flock cameras. It's got an American flag laying on top. This man is a patriot. And I think we should build a statue for him. Uh, it's going to clip number four here. This is, uh, Jeff on Martinez are new founding father. Welcome to the ranks, sir. Let's watch. I decided to, uh, liberate the people at Bernalillo. Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department has unsubscribe from flock cameras, which I commend you. It's a smart move, but I know you guys are busy. So I went and took them all down for you. I guess I'll right now to drop them off. I'm going to do this at 111, uh, hard time. But yeah,
ABC. So I love you guys. You guys are awesome. On the record for the record and let the record show. I'm simply not breaking them. I'm not still in. I guess I'm already out of it. Oh, it's like they already had a pre-planned. They're tyranny trees. The tyranny trees. I'm not cutting the lines like I usually do. He's a lumberjack harvesting the tyranny trees. It's getting more. Those of you watching, I'm not breaking them. I'm not still in them. I'm returning. Not in my city, not in my state. Here's getting pulled over. He's got his hands out. They're ordering him to turn around.
He's wearing a Hawaiian shirt. It's being approached by the sheriff's in their undercover vehicle told the walk backwards. They're pretending like this guy's dangerous. Now he's going to have to go down to his knees. He's got his hands up. Man with truck full of flat cameras arrested in Albuquerque. I'm sorry. I think you mean hero. I think you mean hero patriot with truck full of tyranny trees arrested in Albuquerque by jack booted thugs. His license plate says diplomat. Is he a diplomat? I wonder if he's like a sovereign citizen type. Looks like he's got a princess mononoki shirt on. I knew it was a cool guy. So, I don't understand why he's being arrested. He didn't break a law. I mean, according to him, he's like, well, because what happens? Because here's what happens. Here's the secret behind this video. Flop cameras get put up by flock when your city signs up for flock and you pay and they put them up. Then they leave them up. So even if you cancel flock,
those cameras remain up and most of them have solar panels. So it's not like the city has to provide them electricity. They just run perpetually. And once they're up, flock doesn't take them down. And the city usually doesn't take them down. So even if your city cancels its flock contract, the overall nationwide flock network will still have access to your area. And they'll still be able to access those cameras or the archives of those cameras. So they canceled the flock contract. They were not doing flock anymore. So this guy just goes around. He's not damaging the cameras. He's not keeping them. He's returning them to the sheriff's office. He's not, you know, vandalizing and taking down a piece of city property. The city doesn't want them anymore. The city voted to not have flock cameras. It sounds like he just did the city's job for them. And they should be thanking him. It sounds like they should perhaps give them a per-dem and let him do it all over the country because he's clearly very good at this. So I don't mean even if you're one of these people, like there's lots of views on flag him. Some
people love him. But it's always predicated on like, well, they don't like them. They got to go to their city council and get them done. It's like, all right, well, the city council did vote to take them down. So you can't really be mad about that, right? You can't really be mad about, you know, people who are like, oh, I'm against flock cameras, but I don't think we should be chopping them down because you're putting your life at risk. Right. Young guys being sent to jail for felonies over coming down flock cameras, but like, he didn't cut them down. He just, he just unscrewed them and took them down. So he didn't damage them. I don't know who could be against this. I don't know who would be against this. I'm for it personally. Richie from Boston at InU look and refinished on X clip number nine. Posted these videos of night vision filter over flat cameras. We can go to clip number nine here. It plays, we were all just a few seconds long. But you may have seen this. You can actually see it in your own cell phone camera. A lot of times,
if you look through your cell phone camera at something like a camera with night vision, you'll see the flashes. Yeah, we can play this next one too. We go ahead and we can roll right into clip 10 because it's the same thing. But what this is is these are sort of infrared flashes capturing people walking by. So those people are not in a car just walking by and you can see the infrared flashing taking pictures of them. So obviously it proves it's not just scanning license plates. It's obviously taking pictures of just the people walking around and you wouldn't see that. Normally if you'd walk by you wouldn't see the flashes. But when you look through a night vision camera or even through your cell phone, sometimes you can see the flashes that occur. A little bit concerning, a little bit. So more people are turning against the flat cameras and it's not just flock. Obviously it's all of these. It's their competitors as well. Axon and others. And I know that I think Josh Hawley is the senator who is basically trying to make them a legal nationwide. And he's now added their competitors to flat cameras as well.
We got a lot of news about Lindsay Clancy and we'll be talking with Viva Fry about that later today. Here's the story by the way of this guy futurism.com. Well most vandals ripping down automatic license plate readers prefer to go incognito and albuquerque character named Yvonne Martinez or Jevon Martinez wasn't afraid to show his face. Weeks after Bernillo Bernillo, Lilo, county officials canceled their contract with the controversial surveillance company flock earlier this year. Martinez noticed the automatic license plate readers were still up. In a series of videos posted on social media and flagged by KOB4, Martinez filmed himself tearing the camera towers down in order to return them to the rightful owners. It's doing a service. I'm telling you. I love this. Can we get this guy on the show? We got to reach out to this guy. We got to find out what this guy's socials are so we can actually reach out to him. Although it wasn't armed and hadn't committed any violent offense, officers made a dramatic show force as they arrested him. Clad with ballistic resistant plate carriers, the deputies surrounded
Martinez as truck, trying their guns and forcing him into cuffs. Because that's what the flock cameras are for. They're for catching people that are against flock cameras, obviously. And again, I mean, you know, yeah, I says I'm just liberating my people from tyranny. It's not, we just keep making the same argument over and over again because the same thing over and over again. The flock cameras are not the reason that crime doesn't get solved. They're not going to help lower crime if the criminals that are captured on flock cameras are just let out again. As happens over and over, there's nothing that's going to reduce crime by just having high definition footage of the crimes that go unpunished. No, they're going to be used for other things. We can go clip 35 here. This is the type of stuff. Flock cameras will be used to solve. These are the types of events that our law enforcement will prioritize over and above things like the teen takeovers that almost inevitably end in gunfire and violence and always end in property destruction and
general disturbing of the peace. They're not going to use flock cameras to go after the homeless dude that's been arrested 175 times. And they let them out in hand to them a shetty on the way. Like that, it's not going to help with that sort of stuff. It will help to stop you from carrying out your own acts of justice. If you defend yourself, flock cameras will be very helpful in charging you with that murder for defending yourself. We've got a lot of problems in the justice system, in the justice system. Lack of perpetual surveillance is not one of them. Let's go now to clip 35. This is the priority of law enforcement in America these days. Two of the kids were here on this swing while several others twisted it so that when it untwisted, the kids would be dizzy. Well, that's when this swing fell to the ground and Husk tells me her 10 and 12 year old daughters were charged with a crime.
They were super scared. You are looking at the criminal charges filed against Katie Husk's young girls, each charged with criminal mischief and ordered to court for breaking the swing they were playing on their good little girls. They go out and they play their 10 and 12. They're not doing anything crazy to us. These charges were baffling but expected. She tells me after the swing was broken police came to her door asking she pay for the repairs. And when she asked for evidence, the girls broke the swing intentionally and proof the park was inspected prior. Husk says she was warned that things would get worse. Makes a comment that they are just trying to resolve this civilly and not jam the kids up with a citation or criminal charges. That's when Husk says they found themselves in court. This is a copy of the transcripts showing the Springdale police officer who charged the girls testified that they were negligently not using the swing properly.
And the burrow solicitor Craig Alexander told the judge people do things all the time for the thrill to get a kick out of something and knowing that they're breaking the law. Husk says ultimately her girls were found not responsible because there was no intent but she fears this is not the end. Husk says she was told the burrow is considering filing civilly and she says she will continue to fight back. I'm still waiting to find out if they're going to escalate it further as they promised. I'm not going to give in. So there you go folks. An 11 and 12 year old girl or 10 and 12 year old girl dragged into court. Apparently where surveillance camera footage was shown trying to charge them over breaking a swing by swinging on it. They twisted up a swing and so they were being charged at 10 and 12 years old.
It's just do not have anything better to do. You've solved all of the crime in the city and there's not a single outstanding criminal charge. It needs to be investigated. You're bothering 10 and 12 year olds like this is the future of flock cameras and the future of flock cameras. I mean they won't be sitting as the officer to deliver a citation to your door. No, no, no, they'll be it'll simply show up as a demarrate on your central bank digital currency account. You won't have a chance to question the surveillance footage. You'll just be fine to a certain amount. You'll just have to accept that. Matt Van Swole posted this. A mother is furious after a Pennsylvania town criminally charged her two young girls 10 and 12 and dragged them into court because because a playground swing broke while they were spinning on it. Like I think the correct thing actually to do is for the mother to sue the city and say that the kid broke her neck. Put the kid in a neck brace. Sue the city for $10 million for having an
unsafe swing. I think that is the answer actually. I think if they're going to want to give your kid a ticket for playing on a swing that broke, I think the correct thing to do is to sue the city for injuring your child by not keeping up their playground equipment. I think that would actually be the correct righteous thing to do at this point. Yes, you read that right. They twisted the chains to spin the swing around and that's illegal. Kids, you're not allowed to have fun at a playground. Go inside, put on your AI glasses, be a wally person. You're supposed to be a wally person. I'm playing outside. We'll continue to talk about, there's got to be a term that encompasses the flat cameras and the data centers, the surveillance grid and the data center requirements to manage that grid because it's all the same talk because it's obviously the very same topic.
And the BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has says the US will have to spend roughly $10 trillion over the next decade to build out AI infrastructure. 10 trillion dollars over the next decade. Now, where's he going to get that money? Obviously, your pockets, your retirement funds. That's who it's going to go to. That's where he's going to get it. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink openly announced that ordinary people's savings would be seized to build AI data centers. Mandatory forced, done deal, except that's not what he said. What Fink actually predicted is more nuanced and still with your attention, especially if you hold a 401k, the gap between viral version and the source reality is wide enough to drive a data center through. That's the article. Let's find out. First of all, let's watch the video. Clip number 13 here. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink just openly stated that the trillions of dollars being used to build data centers and power grids will come from ordinary people's savings accounts and pension funds,
calling it mandatory that people will be forced to invest in, quote unquote, invest in their own prison being built. Watch Clip number 13 now. We can get more and more Americans to think about growing with the United States. We will have far than enough money to invest in this infrastructure. But as the governor was talking about the need for electrons is growing every day. If we're going to be the leader in technology, which we are, if we are going to be the leader in AI, which we presently are, it's just going to require trillions of dollars of investments. And if we don't invest in it, China will be the global leader of this. And so to me, it's not weather. This is a must. And if you think about how that translates into a more dynamic economy,
we need the United States economy to grow over 2%. We need the US economy to grow at 3%. Especially with the growing deficits the federal government has. And so much of this money, not just the private sector, it's going to be coming from the private sector, from saving accounts, from pension accounts, from insurance companies on and on. The whole world is in need of improving the infrastructure. We have to. I mean, it's for the sake of the world. The $10 trillion AI revolution, why it's bigger than the industrial revolution. Because the industrial revolution did not, in fact, create a prison planet to enslave the world. That's what the AI revolution is promising. You can just not listen to him. Like I could argue against him, but at the end of the day, he's simply asserting things without evidence that can be dismissed without evidence. When he says,
there is no question, we must do this. The answer is, no, we don't. Oh, but we must. Oh, but no, we don't. No, we must do it. We just don't. Like, I don't know what else to tell you. It's just we don't need the data centers. We don't need the extra space. We don't need any of that. Again, China beating us today, AI attends as many data centers. They run a social credit system for 1.4 billion people, one tenth number of data centers. The American data centers do service the entire world, the entire world when they get on the internet, accesses American data servers. Why do we do that for them? And where is the benefit to us? Because all we get are the negatives. Now, let's be clear. I don't know when that video is from. I don't know. I don't think it's a reason why I think I've seen it before. Regardless, this article is the new one and they're
obviously doing this. Maybe it is a new video. All I know is that several months ago, we were covering the private equity bailout of private retirement funds and saving accounts. In other words, private equity bought up a bunch of bad assets, you know, liquidated them, stripped them for all of the sellable parts and then couldn't find anybody to sell it to so they'd package it up with something else and just sort of funnel it to another private equity group. And they would do the same thing over again. It was a giant Ponzi scheme. They made bad investments and then they went, well, we could be okay if you would just open up retirement funds for us. If you would just give us the money that individuals have saved for themselves, then we wouldn't have to suffer the consequences of our own bad greedy destructive decisions. And so that's what happened. Trump administration seeks to bail out private equity credit, private equity and private credit with workers 401k savings, PSP warn. So this was all the way back in March 25th of this year.
Trump admin bails out private equity, private credit with 401k's. New rule expands access to private equity despite evidence of underperformance high fees and ill-equidity risk. The Trump administration, the Trump White House yesterday, March 24th, 2026 concluded a review of a new rule expanding access to private equity investments in 401k retirement plans. Following the White House completion of this review, the private equity stakeholder project warned that the move could expose tens of millions of workers to higher fees lower returns and opaque risks that are poorly suited to retirement savings. This rule follows President Trump's push to open 401k plans to private equity and other alternative assets, a shift that could weaken logstanding a futitiary protection for retirement savers that benefit Wall Street firms. PSP is especially concerned about proposals to provide regulatory safe harbor for private equity investments in 401k plans. President Trump's executive order directed the Department of Labor to explore safe harbors that would limit the ability of consumers to sue if private equity managers or 401k managers or providers
make recommendations that are contrary to their fear dishiary duty to retirement savers and multiple US senators have pressed the department to formalize those. Do you understand like the real long-term point of this is that if you tie up people's retirement funds into private equity, then if private equity gets in trouble, they'll be able to turn around and go, you have to bail us out again or else all of these people are going to lose their retirement funds. So not only is it bailing them out with your money without your permission, but it's tying up your retirement with their funds. So if their funds do badly, it'll be you that suffers. If everybody in America has their retirement fund liquidated and emptied, the government's going to have to step in. They're not going to bail out the retirement funds. They're going to bail out the private equity to keep them afloat so they can give you the returns on your quote unquote investment, which was actually just a theft by them. We covered this extensively with Tiffany Cianci. Maybe we need to get her in next week to talk about this more,
but you can always search Tiffany Cianci on my profile on x and find very, very in-depth coverage of exactly how this came about. But this article wants to debunk this idea that Larry Fink said and the White House wrote about. Fink argued that the US will need roughly $10 trillion of the next decade to build out AI infrastructure, data centers, power grids, the whole backbone. Speaking at the Milk Inn Institute, global conference, he predicted that quote much of this money is going to be coming from the private sector from savings accounts, from pension accounts, from insurance companies. That's a prediction about capital flows, not an executive order. Fact checkers confirmed the quote is genuine that the quote mandatory framing is not. Well, he's saying that you don't have the ability to opt out. I mean, that is what mandatory. Essentially, if you don't go in and direct your 401k to not be invested in this stuff, then it will automatically be invested in this stuff. Because the way that this works is, you know, basically private equity was not considered a safe
enough bet for 401k's to be put on. I mean, if you're to your retirement, this isn't like some high risk, high yield, quick turnaround. We're going to flip some stocks and make a ton of money. I mean, that's not what you want to do with your retirement fund because you depend on it. You want something that grows steadily and over a long period of time, you want to invest in just the general market. Private equity is a different beast entirely, so it was never considered safe enough to be a location for 401k funds. And basically, just recategorize it. Actually, now it can be invested in that, and so it will be. So your money manager will just basically follow that instruction, just like they did with ESG, right? Even though ESG and DEI, you know, deliberately prioritized the ethnic makeup of the boardroom rather than the profitability of the company, that still was suddenly the instruction that was followed by the money managers. They'll do the same thing in this regard. So the key distinction, the fact checkers confirmed, think made a prediction
about where capital will likely come from, not a policy announcement. Okay, kind of. Here's the problem. He's the guy. He's the guy that's ahead of the black rock. He's the guy that decides. He's the CEO of black rock. So when he says this, it is in fact, an order from black rock, like black rock is receiving these orders. He's not telling his executives that black rock something different. So what do you mean? He's like, is just a prediction about where capital will come from. Not really. No, no, they worked very hard to open up the funnel into this pool of money that they're now siphoning out. You think it was an accident? He's just predicting. You know how there's always had like, they're all, you know, the people who are in charge make their decisions look like predictions. Have you ever noticed that? What they're actually telling you is we are taking your money. We will be siphoning out the cash of your 401ks because we need it because we so poorly managed, you know, the previous chunk of money we had in our hands that we need you to bail
us out and it won't be optional and we are doing it. And then, you know, you get a fact checker to come in and go, well, he was just predicting. He was just making a prediction about what might happen. No, he wasn't. I shouldn't have to tell you that. The word mandatory does not appear in the source quote. Fact checkers found it originated from social media commentary, not things remarks. Nobody said it's not an option, which is a synonym for mandatory. So thank you for the semantic nitpicking. BlackRock clarified that savings accounts refer to long term retirement style accounts like 401ks not checking or demand deposit savings. Well, not yet. I mean for now. And in fact, I don't know if I had the video. I don't know if I ever brought it in. Maybe the crew can find it. I believe those are sell of Vanderland talking about this and basically being like, you know, Germans have a lot of money in their savings and their like checking accounts and their greedily holding on to it when it could be used to help expand our markets.
So I mean, they are going after all of the accounts. They'll just go after your savings first. Your long term retirement savings. The $10 trillion figure reflects Finks own estimate, not an independently verified projection. The underlying concern retirement savers being steered into high risk private market assets is legitimate, even if the quote unquote forced framing isn't. Yeah, but it is. And again, I don't remember the exact details, but we talked about it with Tiffany Cianci last time she was in here where like, yes, if you want to not be in these high risk, private equity, you have to get in contact with the company that manages your 401k and specifically tell them not to invest in this sort of stuff. Some 401ks don't even have that option. So it is mandatory for people like that. You know, your company chooses who your 401k is with. The company they go with determines what rights you have to dictate where that money goes. I mean, it's mandatory. It is mandatory. In fact, it is forced. Yes, you are forced to do it. Oh, yeah, I found the clip. All right, let's go to Ursula Vanderlain saying this. It must
have been earlier this week, right? Let's watch. She said savings, unfortunately, are lazy. 10 trillion euros of household savings. Hey, there's that number again. Remain in bank deposits. And a significant portion of European savings is invested outside our continent. Europe must now put these savings at the service of these companies. And that is the goal of the savings at investment union. We have put forward proposals on securitization. On investments by banks and insurance companies. On the integration of our markets, their operation and their supervision. Together, they can unlock up to 470 billion euros of additional investment.
So again, I mean, I don't think she's talking about retirement savings. That's how she said, she said, bank deposits. And how curious is that 10 trillion euros? It's the exact number. Gosh, what are the odds? What a coincidence that here in America, private equity is getting access to retirement funds at the same time that Europe is opening up their savings accounts to plundering by these private equity companies. And they both do it for 10 trillion dollars. It's almost like we're not to distinct nations or political organizations, but rather it's almost like we're both being managed by the same super national unelected corporate oversight tyrants. Isn't that crazy? When I'd be crazy if that was the case. And this is why they want to have things like expiring money. They want all of your money to be digital and they want you to be required to spend it in a certain amount of time. They literally don't want you saving. They don't want you
saving up. They don't want you making big purchases. They don't want you owning anything. Do you know that? Have they told you that enough? Have we told you that enough? They don't want you owning anything ever. And this is just a precursor to that. But they have the technological ability to do it and nobody's stopping them. So I guess, you know, it's moral in their view. Now, obviously he's talking about taking all that money to build data centers in the infrastructure for AI. The data center companies have in certain cases learned how to appeal to people at least ostensibly. And there are examples now of places where they're actually benefiting from data centers arriving basically data centers go, well, we'll make this many billions of dollars with it. So we'll cut you off a slice. And it's sizable enough to convince people to do it. That's not been the case up till now. That's only the case because of the outrage that we've been expressing. And you got to remember
that too. Because the way this stuff works is they'll turn around in a couple months. And they'll say the data center outrage was so stupid they wanted you to not get a $10,000 check from the data company center, the data center company, right? They wanted you to miss out on this prosperity. It's like, you only made that offer because of the outrage. If we hadn't said anything, if the data centers had just been built in the background, they never would have made agreements with cities to actually provide benefits to the city. The pressure was necessary. These people wanted the data centers to go in basically paid for by tax dollars or the money they get out of your retirement fund paid for by your money. In other words, and then they would reap all of the benefits entirely. And not only would they build it with your money, the taxes or the accounts that they plunder for it, not only that, but then your electricity and utility prices skyrocket. We have a video of that. Let's go to clip number eight here. From Wall Street apes, my jaw literally dropped American shows the increase in her power and water bill since her state became the data center
capital of the world. This is Virginia power from 2024, 2025. And then they built the data centers and you see the consequence. Let's watch. I live in Virginia, which is the data center capital of the United States apparently. This was our power bill for August of 2024. $325. $375. $450. This is our two month water bill. 561. This increase in bills is really mind blowing. This woman lives in Virginia about 70% of the internet traffic in the world goes through Virginia. They are the data center capital of the world. As more data centers get built, you see these massive increases in electricity bills for residents and also in the water bill. That water bill is just insane. How many data centers are in Virginia? Currently, there's an estimate of about 370 344 of them are confirmed to be operating, but take a
look at this. There is 600 to 850 plus that are planned or under construction. So residents that are already seeing these insane increases on their power bills. It's only going to go up, up, and up. And how many data centers were built during the specific time period? It was from 2024 to 2026. There is no exact figure, but in just one year, there was a 37% jump in power usage. So who's paying for that? It is definitely not the data centers. We can take one look at these bills and see it is the residents who are paying for this power increase. There you go. So not only data centers in northern Virginia consume almost 30% of electricity in the Commonwealth. Your tax dollars will be going to build it. Your retirement fund will be plundered to pay for it. Then your bills will go up. For all of this, the return to you is that somebody somewhere is going to benefit. You get to make silly videos with AI, so that's good, isn't it? And it's like just imagine, I mean, what would you have to get for this all to be worth
it? For you to be paying twice as much every month for your electricity. You think you'd have some sort of benefit that would be tangible, but no. No, no, no, no. We don't know. We don't have money to fix the potholes outside your house. We don't have the money to rebuild the Baltimore bridge that some Indian dude knocked over five years ago whenever it was. You know, they still haven't even like they just finished clearing the debris from that, you know. In the meantime, China has built the tallest bridge in the world and could have done it many times over. The bridges that we bombed in Iran have been rebuilt. Did you know that? We can't rebuild this, though. No, no, because we don't have money. We're spending all of our money on data centers and legal immigration. We don't have the money to repair, let alone improve the actual infrastructure that matters to you and you interact with on a daily basis. Just why a lot of people are feeling like this. Clip number 14, again, from Wall Street Apes, American in her car breaking down in
tears over the state of our economy and our future as we get older. Let's watch. I don't have a clue what is going on in America anymore, but I just came out of the Walmart out of my local Walmart. And this little lady, little hudged over lady was ringing me up at my ass girl. She was having a good day and she said, I don't know. I just got here. She said, I just came from my other job. This lady was like 70 plus. She already worked at the college for six hours and she was going to be here. It's 316. She was going to be here until 11 o'clock tonight. Like what? I don't want to do this anymore. Obviously, we need to keep raising awareness about the cost of living and that seniors are no longer
able to just retire and some seniors are now forced to work multiple jobs. But there's a whole another issue that we need to also talk about and that is the propaganda comment spam where you get anti-republican and anti-Trump comments and then you get huge engagement on those comments and I swear it's boss. Just look at the comments on this post. It's horrible what Trump has done to this country. Thousand likes. This is Republicans America. This is what Republicans want. Keep voting red and our seniors will continue to work until their last breath. I feel like we're in hell. This is what Republicans want. And all the comments are the same all the way down. Of course, we need the cost of living to come down. But by the comments, you would think, oh, this is a Republicans issue. But that is not at all the case. Let's just look at the data right here. During Biden's term in office, we saw a 21.5% CPI raise. That is a true inflation right there. Okay, 21.5%. Okay, well, how does that compare to Trump? Trump was actually able to slow that down. Trump's current
term is shorter because it only been there for two years. But the rate so far has been just 2.3% to 4.2% year over year. So who is the actual problem here? Is it Biden who skyrocketed over 21% or is it the person who slows it down to around 2.3% per year? You know, based on the comments, you would think, oh, this is a Republican issue. But really, Democrats are the ones destroying our economy. They destroyed our way of living, our cost of living. Rents went up 30% under them during Biden. So he's right, but it's both of them. It's both sides. Nearly half of US households can't make ends meet. And the problem of those comments is mostly a messaging problem that it mostly is the Republicans fault. How many times have you heard Republican, I mean, Trump himself is like, I don't care about the economy. Who cares? Pull yourself up by your bootstraps. I mean, this is the message you're getting. Meanwhile, videos like that keep coming out. And the only people actually
responding to it are the socialists going, we know, we know this is the Republicans fault they're doing it. The reality is, as Wall Street Apes points out, the opposite. However, whose fault is it? I don't know. The Republicans aren't getting rid of the illegal immigrants to any sizeable degree. They aren't actually, you know, tangibly doing anything to make anything better for anybody. The Iran War is obviously driven up prices across the board on diesel, especially, which makes everything more expensive down the line. That woman's right. And she's pointing to something that goes way beyond politics. Fundamentally, our priorities are not just out of whack. They're completely and totally inverted. Some old lady wouldn't be working behind the cash register if she was a Somalian with a daycare, right? The scammers that succeed here.
More episodes
More from Alex Jones and Infowars Shows Commercial Free - RonGibsonChannel on Odysee
WAR ROOM LIVE [FULL] Thursday 9/10/26 • Disgusting Leftists Celebrate ‘Kirkavers...
Alex Jones and Infowars Shows Commercial Free - RonGibsonChannel on Odysee
20260910-WAR-ROOM-LIVE-MP3-PODCAST
Alex Jones and Infowars Shows Commercial Free - RonGibsonChannel on Odysee
WAR ROOM LIVE [3 of 3] Thursday 9/10/26 • HARRISON SMITH - News, Calls & Analysi...
Alex Jones and Infowars Shows Commercial Free - RonGibsonChannel on Odysee
WAR ROOM LIVE [2 of 3] Thursday 9/10/26 • TRUMPS MIDTERM SHOW, News, Reports & A...
Alex Jones and Infowars Shows Commercial Free - RonGibsonChannel on Odysee