Loading...
Loading...

Today, President Trump outlined the objectives of Operation Epic Fury saying he took the “last best chance” to hit Iran.
The president said the objectives of the operation in Iran are "clear", including "destroying Iran's missile capabilities", "annihilating their Navy" and preventing them from ever having a nuclear weapon.
Adam is joined by Jane Corbin, Panorama Film Maker, Lyse Doucet, Chief International Correspondent and Caitriona Perry Chief Anchor BBC News Washington
You can now listen to Newscast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Newscast”. It works on most smart speakers. You can join our Newscast online community here: https://bbc.in/newscastdiscord
Get in touch with Newscast by emailing [email protected] or send us a WhatsApp on +44 0330 123 9480.
New episodes released every day. If you're in the UK, for more News and Current Affairs podcasts from the BBC, listen on BBC Sounds: https://bbc.in/4guXgXd Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest political news stories from the BBC. The presenter was Adam Fleming. It was made by Jack Maclaren with Shiler Mahmoudi and Kris Jalowiecki. The social producer was Jem Westgate and Gabriel Purcell-Davis. The technical producer was Frank McWeeny. The assistant editor is Chris Gray. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham.
This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.
Craving the coffee flavor you love.
But without the caffeine,
kachavas got you covered with their newest coffee flavor.
This all-in-one nutrition shake delivers bold, authentic flavor,
crafted from premium, decaffeinated Brazilian beans.
Quality nutrition shouldn't be complicated.
Just two scoops of kachavas all-in-one nutrition shake,
and you've got 25 grams of protein,
6 grams of fiber, greens, and so much more.
Whether you're craving that coffee taste to kick start your morning ritual,
or as a nutrient-packed reward to round out your afternoon,
kachava keeps you fueled and satisfied wherever your day takes you.
Plus, it actually tastes delicious.
No fillers, no nonsense.
Just the good stuff your body craves.
And for the times you feel like switching it up,
you've got seven flavors to choose from,
all with the highest quality ingredients.
Treat yourself to the flavor and nutrition your body craves.
Go to kachava.com and use code news.
New customers get 15% off their first order.
That's K-A-C-H-A-V-A.com code news.
This is Byard Winthrop, founder of American Giant.
We make all our clothing right here in the U.S.
with American cotton and American workers.
Get 20% off your first order
when you use code giant20 at American-giant.com.
Hello!
So, do you remember a few months ago
when the Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in the U.S.A
renamed his job to be the Secretary of War?
Well, now he's got a war as the U.S. and Israel
continue to attack Iran in a really quite big way.
And today we heard from Pete Hegseth,
as he gave the world an update.
My generation of veterans carried the names of brothers
who never came home.
Brothers butchered by Iranian-backed roadside bombs
and well-armed militias,
thousands of our own.
We didn't start this war,
but under President Trump, we are finishing it.
Yes, so we will tell you more about what the Americans have been saying
about their trying to achieve in this military action.
We'll also tell you a lot more about how Iran has been
launching counterattacks against its neighbors
and also a big change in the UK's position in this conflict.
That's all coming up on this episode of newscast.
And we're going to be pumping out episodes throughout the week
on this enormous story for the world.
And if you never want to miss one,
then click on subscribe.
And whenever they're recorded,
they will be then up there on your device ready for you to listen
with all the best analysis we can muster at the BBC.
So here is the latest episode of newscast.
Newscast.
Newscast from the BBC.
Fat boys live in the classroom doing avar in lessons.
I was the toppled tail in the class.
Can I have an apology, please?
I trust almost nobody.
That daddy has to sometimes do strong language.
Next time in Moscow.
I feel delulu with no salulu.
Take me down the Downey Street.
Let go have a tour.
Blimey.
Hello, it's Adam in the newscast studio.
And all this week we're going to be joined by a friend of the podcast
on panorama.
It's Jane Corbin.
Hello again, Jane.
Hello.
And Lee's to set us here.
Hello, Lee's.
Good to join you.
Adam and good to see you again, Jane.
And you, Lee's.
Now, before we do the analysis,
which I know from you two will be excellent.
Just a little slice of life in covering this war.
Jane, just before we started recording,
your phone started glaring.
Just explain what that was.
That is the Israeli rocket siren device.
It tells you that rockets are incoming.
And it's been going off nonstop, obviously, since Saturday.
And yeah, it goes off all the time.
Normally I have it on silent.
But for some reason it broke through even
that I've put it on silent.
And it tells you where they're coming,
how many are coming, roughly which area.
And it's extraordinary in terms of the numbers.
And that's obviously referring both to rockets and missiles,
but also to drones, which they call hostile aircraft
on the, on the app.
And is that just on your phone from previous trips there?
Or do you have it as a sort of journalistic tool?
Both, sometimes when it's really too much.
And especially at night, you know, obviously take it off.
But, you know, there has been a huge amount going on in Israel.
And it's important to know.
And it's important to attempt to, you know, keep tabs on it, really.
And Lee's.
That brings the BBC slogan of live the story
to a whole new level.
Yeah. Wow.
Keep yours on.
No, I did when I came to Laskin, but then I took it off.
But, but it is amazing because you'll be reminded,
especially when it's a big one.
And also, Lee's talk about living the story.
I think this is the first time I've seen you face to face
since you were actually in Iran, four nights ago.
How does, how does that work in your brain,
covering this military action now,
but thinking back to just being there on the ground so recently?
Well, on a personal level, then, you know,
some of the people that I met there, work there,
they're on my mind immediately.
I'm saying, you know, whatever,
but whatever you report about this,
this is individuals that you know and journalists that I know.
So just how are you?
Are you, are you safe?
And did you get a message on your, on your mobile
about the Revolutionary Guards warning you not to go into the streets?
And so it's, it's much more vivid in your mind.
So I came back and I still have a much better understanding,
I think, of the mood of the mood in Iran,
very much a country at the crossroads.
Because, of course, and we're seeing this in these,
the reaction to the Supreme Leader's death,
there are those who revere him as a religious leader.
They, they're, they've been in the streets
with these outpourings of emotion.
But there are also many who revile him.
And they've been taking to the streets,
mostly in the dead of night where they feel they're safer,
just to celebrate.
And there's been celebrations here in London as well
in the Iranian communities.
And we can talk a bit more about that in a second.
But Jane, this is a sort of moment
where you want to have a big atlas open in front of you.
So you can sort of point to all of Iran's neighbors
because the big theme of the last 36, 48 hours
has been Iran's counterattacks and striking their neighbors.
Yeah, and everybody said before that this risk,
the regional war, and it's amazing how quickly we've got there.
They've hit, I think, eight different countries.
And obviously Cyprus as well, British base in Cyprus.
So all of those countries, all of those leaders are drawn
in Willie Nile, and they're pretty angry about it.
They're pretty outraged that they who took no part in the strikes,
which were carried out by Israel and by America.
Nevertheless, got back in kind very quickly.
And I think Bahrain was hit very badly to begin with.
You obviously see what's happened in Dubai
where a lot of British people live and go on holiday.
And right across the region in Iraq, in Erbil, in Saudi even,
all of those countries have been hit by Iranian missiles.
And it's so interesting on social media.
You can see videos that are clearly AI generated
of gleaming skyscrapers in those places on fire, obviously fake.
But then the next thing you see is a video of one that is real.
These places actually being hit genuinely.
This is a moment, not just for Iran, but for the entire region
before and after a moment.
Iran has now changed forever.
So has the region, including countries,
particularly the wealthy Gulf monarchies who have their whole model,
politically, economically, security is based on being the perception
that they are a safe haven.
They're a safe harbor from the kind of tensions and turmoil
which have racked the rest of the Middle East.
Come and spend your dollars here, invest here, come and be a tourist.
Now you can imagine, I would imagine, and when this is all over,
you'll see big billboards in the underground.
People saying, come back, come back.
And once your image is shattered, it will take time.
It will come back in time.
But what has also been shattered is the diplomacy
and the new relationships that Iran had built up with Arab leaders.
And they had been at daggers drawn for decades.
But in recent years, Arab leaders realizing that regional issues
need regional solutions and the Saudis and the Emirates and Qataris.
Well, Qatar and Oman have always had relations with Iranian leadership.
But whenever there was a crisis, the foreign minister of Iran,
Abbas, that actually could pick up the telephone
and call all of these Arab capitals and those leaders
had been working around the clock, either on the telephone to President Trump
or racing to Washington to say, don't embark on another destructive war.
The consequences will be huge.
And now those same leaders are turning their fire against Iran
and saying, why are you hitting us?
It's so much, so much is literally burning in this moment.
And it's literally burning for those countries
which are the source of great energy for all of us.
So a gas plants been hit in Qatar, oil refining has been hit in Saudi.
And that's an incredible shock to the system to them,
but also to all of us because the Straits of Hormuz,
that very strategic waterway through which vast quantities
are both gas and oil flow is effectively closed.
And I think the shock that's being felt in those countries
which are producing that energy, that this could have happened,
that Iran could have done this is really unprecedented.
Although it's interesting reading about all the workarounds
these countries are using to try and get their oil and gas out
by other means, so maybe actually the shock to the oil price
might not be as dramatic as it might initially appear.
No, and I think the shock to the gas price
has actually been bigger than the shock to the oil price
and that there will be a way around it.
And I believe that today some ships did pass
through the Straits of Hormuz, Chinese, for example.
And so maybe the shock will, as you say,
there'll be a workaround and some will feel
it's worth the risk of moving through.
But tanker, insurance, no one's going to be able to get insurance
and no one's going to want to take the risk
when you're carrying such precious cargo.
And of course, the big issue is, for a few days,
perhaps, that people can get through this.
But what about if it goes on and on?
This is really a measure of this phrase that we use
in covering conflicts of this coming chain has,
of course, covered many asymmetric warfare.
How do you take on the might of the most powerful army
in the world, the United States, and the assets of Israel,
including its staggering intelligence gathering,
capabilities, and Iran had warned.
As Jane mentioned, I was really taken,
when I interviewed the Deputy Foreign Minister,
Majid Talk to Ravanshi.
And I said, if there is, if a war is unleashed,
will you regard it as existential?
And he said, yes, well, if we do,
if we do regard it as existential,
it would be a different kind of war.
And then I pressed him, well, what would happen?
What would be so bad?
And he said, I don't want to get in
to what an existential war would look like for us,
because it would be a very bad situation,
not just for us, but for the entire region.
And there, I mean, when you have the attack,
the first wave of attacks, early on Saturday morning,
and they acted on intelligence,
and they were able to kill,
not just the supreme leader, the very top cleric,
Ayatollah Ali, M&A,
but the top four security chiefs,
and possibly more as well.
President Trump is claiming they've killed 48 leaders,
military, and all through those different ranks that we've seen.
And I think, you know, he's right.
It is in it was.
It is an existential threat to Iran.
When you're hitting it at that level,
and killing so many people at once.
But from looking at the coverage around the region,
okay, it's scary for those countries,
it feels like an act of aggression.
But actually, most of the missiles,
most of the drones aren't getting through.
So I'm just wondering, has Iran thrown everything they've got
at its neighbors,
and actually the threat is going to recede from now on?
Or, I mean, it's a speculation, I realize.
Well, Israel has said today that it's claiming that it's hit
underground facilities where ballistic missiles,
and missiles are being built.
We don't know, but the general consensus seems to be,
this will go on for as long as there's ammunition on both sides
to throw at each other.
And Iran has, we know, large stocks,
and of course, of the Shahed drone,
which has been a game-changer in Ukraine,
and is proving to be so here,
and huge waves of these drones are being used already.
And they have enormous industrial facilities,
as I understand, underground to produce these Shahed drones.
So we can only suppose that that is going to carry on
for some times, days, if not weeks.
It's always as interesting that you mentioned,
you pointed at a very important point.
And this is both the strength and the weakness,
not just of journalism, but, of course,
eyewitnesses, is that if you look on the internet,
you will think Dubai is on fire,
because the fire at the palm,
I've seen messages put on social media people saying,
what are you guys talking about?
This instability, the fires in Dubai,
the rest of the city is fine, etc.
But in our very much our social media world,
people just see the images which dominate,
and they do think about,
I'm apparently one of the big questions people are asking
on Google is it's safe to go to Dubai.
And Dubai, the Emirates,
don't want that question to be asked.
So you can see a big divide between people
who are there, maybe on holiday,
or on honeymoon, or visiting,
who want to get out as soon as possible,
and people who've made it their home,
saying actually more relaxed about it.
Right, we're recording this episode of newscast,
it just got 20 past five on Monday afternoon,
just before we sat down,
we heard some remarks from Donald Trump at the White House,
and watching them with Katrina Perry.
Hello, Katrina.
Hi, Adam, how are you?
Forgive the Mary Poppins moment,
I'm here with the umbrella,
because it's just started snowing
outside the White House right now, this moment.
Always extreme weather in DC.
And so this was meant to be a ceremony
that was rewarding kind of military bravery,
so veterans,
but inevitably it became the first chance to hear
from Donald Trump about what he actually wants to achieve here.
Indeed, it is still a Medal of Honor ceremony,
and as I'm speaking to you now,
the President is awarding those medals of honor.
They're being awarded posthumously,
so it's the the sons,
mostly so far of deceased veterans
who are being awarded those medals.
But this was the first time
that President Trump has appeared in public
since giving the authorization
for those strikes on Iran,
which started in the early hours of Saturday morning,
as it was here in the East Coast, just 1.15 AM.
So we hadn't seen him in public,
we hadn't had an opportunity to have him sort of answer questions live.
As we're recording our point out,
he still hasn't done that,
because the layout of where this is happening in the East Room,
the reporters in the correspondence
are quite a distance back from the President,
and it is quite a sort of solemn gathering.
So I do expect that my colleagues
will try and share questions at the President,
but I think it's probably unlikely
that he can even hear them and choose to answer them.
But he did address that situation in Iran,
which is what so many people were looking for him to do,
because there's a sense here
that he hasn't really explained
the justification sufficiently for the significant level of danger
that he has committed the members of the US military to at this point.
So he said he wanted to give an update on Operation Epic Furious.
They're calling it.
He said it was very much still ongoing,
this large-scale combat operation in Iran.
And he gave sort of the rationale for that.
He said Iran was refusing warnings from the US
in the wake of Operation Midnight Hammer at last June
to cease its nuclear weapons capability.
Now, he did also suggest that as he saw it,
there was an imminent threat
that Iran would have nuclear weapons capable of being launched from Iran
and striking the US.
He said he felt that would happen soon.
Now, we should say that his own intelligence agency
has previously put that information to say that position
is many, many years away,
but nevertheless, this is what President Trump is saying
is part of his rationale for explaining this.
He said that he was trying to reach a deal
through negotiations with them,
but he felt that Iran just wasn't interested.
He said he thought a deal was agreed
and then they stepped back from it.
He thought another deal was agreed
and they stepped back from it again.
So he felt he was left with one option only
and that was this campaign of military action.
And he said he wanted to lay out the objectives that he had.
And this was the part I think where he's very much trying to speak
to a domestic US audience who are looking
for what are those objectives.
He said they want to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities.
He wants to annihilate Iran's navy.
He said they'd already sank ten ships.
He said he wanted to ensure that Iran would never have a nuclear weapon.
And he said he also wanted to ensure
that the Iranian regime could not continue to arm and fund
as he put it its terrorist armies
beyond their borders,
referring to the proxies there that you've been discussing.
And again, he said we had a deal and they backed out
and he realized I just can't have a deal with these people.
So that's kind of how he explained it
that he didn't want there to be a threat to the American people.
Will that be enough to satisfy those who don't support
what he has launched the US and the US military into
but we'll have to wait and see?
And Jane, when we were watching this on the TV outside the studio
that one of the things you jumped on straight away
was this very elastic timeline?
Yeah, he said, he said I've always said from the start
it'll be four to five weeks
and then he said but we're ahead of schedule
which presumes that it could be as long as four to five weeks
but if I've decided it's going well,
we might make it shorter than that.
And I thought that was interesting
because that gives some flexibility
but it doesn't leave anybody any the wiser as to how long this is going to last.
And Lisa in terms of the war aims if we could call them as grandly as that
it was four things, wasn't it?
It was taking out Iran's ballistic missile system
it was taking out the nuclear weapons program
it was taking out the navy
and it was stopping Iran's proxies its allies
causing chaos in other countries in the region.
What did you make of the big four?
It's interesting and if Katrin is still with us
I thought that Peter Hegseth, the Secretary of Defence
or he would call himself the Secretary of War
when he gave his remarks earlier today
he said this is not about regime change
but we have changed the regime.
What did you make of that, Christina?
Yeah, I thought that was a really key line
Lisa, I'd agree with you there
and he said this is not a so-called regime change war
again using that word war which is quite controversial
here in the U.S.
And I suppose this is the gets to the crux of the issue
of what is President Trump's grand aim here
notwithstanding that he laid out those four objectives
but he has repeatedly called for the Iranian people
to take back their country
but yet they don't want regime change
they're more laying the conditions for regime change
it would seem and this is the problem of trying to find out
what is the end goal here and I don't think we're any clearer on that
from what the president said or indeed what Secretary Hegseth
and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
said earlier on today and again a very very fluid
timeline Secretary Hegseth saying earlier it could be two weeks
it could be four weeks it could be six weeks
it could be basically whatever the president
decides it could be
And I think that they've had a catcher on
am I right they've had advice from within
from within the security establishment
that this isn't easy that it is not going to necessarily result in a change
regime it is not going to result in the conditions for the people to rise up
and take take over as they've been urged to by President Trump
and I think they're getting that message or they have done
right from within from the CIA and from others who who obviously are
well informed but still the decision was made
to carry on although they and to go for this although
there was no sure far way out of this even from their own advisors
and you just again President Trump who we now know in this second term
how he can change his mind from one day to the next I was reading
some of some of you may also have seen it he had a six-minute interview with
the New York Times and in that six-minute he went from
regime change to talking to the government
to saying that what happened in Venezuela where military action was just
took out Nicholas Maduro the president he described that for
Iran as the perfect scenario so what are we to make of that what is it
is it what he said in his eight-minute speech is it what he said today
not mentioning regime change is it is he still musing
about what the what the warm aim is which must be could be so distressing
for people where you are especially for lawmakers who feel
they should have given him authorization to embark on a
w-a-r exactly I mean there are two legal issues here there's the domestic
legal issue and then there's the question of international law how you act
preemptively in self-defense which isn't a concept that exists in
international law but here domestically Republicans and Democrats
generally unified in their approach or their view that you know Iran is a
threat on some level to the U.S.
imminent or otherwise and that you know some sort of action is justified
but the point of debate is that the president has done this unilaterally it's
very clear in the U.S. Constitution that the only people who can issue a
declaration of war are the members of Congress and it has to be passed through
there it isn't for a president to do now
president Trump isn't the only president who has tried to sort of go around
Congress in this and take unilateral action
in this way but it is causing a lot of tension here
members of Congress do like to be consulted now we know the Secretary of
State Marco Rubio did speak to the gang of eight in advance of these strikes or
at least seven of the eight that being the top leadership within both parties
on Capitol Hill but when you listen to what Secretary Dan Kay or Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Kayn said today he said they were
30 days kind of ready for this operation so this has been something in the
mix for a long time and speaking to members within the military who know
about these things say that the preparation would have actually been
months for a mission like this which as of now is
airstrikes being launched from aircraft and also some missiles being
launched from Navy ships as well the president talking the Secretary
talking earlier about being engaged with the Iranian Navy right now
but military experts would say if you really want regime change that there
has to be some sort of grand level operation as well and they
don't see that the conditions exist for something like that in Iran so
there's this great confusion of there not being the official sort of legal
standing for what's happened but actually what is the endgame what is the point
of all of this in the president's mind and least just explain about how it is
that Iran is run and who has power that would make it so hard for even half
the country 40 million people to rise up and get a new kind of country out of it
just explain why that would be sort of a goal well for us those are
dangerous to go out into the streets people have been sent a message on their
on their telephone saying don't don't go into streets and if you do you'll be
met with an iron fist and you'll be regarded as a collaborator and even when
we were there when when the security forces were expecting there to be more
protest you had the Vasigee which are these volunteer militia on their
motorcycles revving around the squares and looking at people and it felt
really ominous basically saying we're watching you
and I sent a message to a friend and tear on this morning and he said
I was stopped three times last night coming home at makeshift checkpoints by the
elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps so people know how dangerous it is to
go out into the streets and there's to pick up the idea of the Venezuela
option let's say that can you really just I hate this again the decapitation take
out one leader and then find a way to work with the other individuals in the
structure of course in Venezuela's javismo you know the predominately
left-wing radical radical philosophy of the government in charge
Iran is completely different there there's been this discussion in recent days
well could we work with someone could we work with Ali Laryjani who's the Secretary
of the National Security Council who's playing a bigger role yes he is regarded as
being more pragmatic but an individual cannot take over what is a layered system
politically religiously ideologically security you haven't in you haven't
Iran not just the armed forces but you have the elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
which is actually a huge organization and and start into the country yes economic interests
they have schools they have hospitals they are part of the structure of Iran there's no way
that they are just an elite security force and they're they're they're full-maned they were set
up in 1979 because the new leaders didn't trust the army they thought they were elements
still loyal to the Shah their mandate is to preserve and protect the Islamic Republic
and it's widely believed that we there's a new the new leadership is now a three-man
leadership council but behind the scenes even in the selection of the successor when that comes
is the IRGC this one by this acronym will play a deciding role because they will want to know
who's going to be in charge at this moment this a moment of existential threats so it is possible
it's possible that a new supreme leader will emerge who is more on let's say more of a reformist
or there will still be a leading cleric and that elements within the Islamic Revolutionary Guard
Corps for pragmatic reasons could see a way to perhaps you know work you know because the
supreme leader was known for his hostility toward Israel and the United States deeply suspicious
of any contacts with the West especially the United States even though he authorized his teams
to negotiate with the United States it is possible that could take but it's not going to be easy
or swift or at least I'm going to interrupt you because I've just had a message saying you're
meant to have been on the news channel for about five minutes ago so I feel I should maybe
let you go but I'm just asking and Jane knows this a little very well there's this phrase
that the revolutionary leader Ayatoll Humane used in 1988 when he agreed grudgingly with great
bitterness to a ceasefire because he realized that the it was existential that the survival of the
Islamic Republic against Iraq Iran was isolated he had to he said I drank from a poisoned
chalice has that moment come again that they will drink from a poison chalice right now they are
fighting a battle to survive Lisa I'm going to let you go there's lots of demands on your time so
thank you very much for giving us your time it's so good to see you too I was going to say that
we know that in that strike on Saturday one of the key people in the defense area that was
killed was the leader of the IRGC this is elite force at least was talking about but you know
we also know that after the 12-day war and last June when there were the initial strikes on Iran
by Israel and America Hamanay the Supreme Leader worked very hard to put in place more layers of
people who could take over if these very top military officials were killed so we know that's
happened and we also know as I covered this in in great detail that when Qasim Soleimani who
was the great IRGC leader was killed by Donald Trump in his first term by a drone another leader
quickly arose to head the IRGC and Trump himself is saying how evil in Trump's words they are so
this did not affect the way that the IRGC operated and I don't think the killing of their present
leader on Saturday will make a difference because by now there will be somebody else heading that
and they have such a vested interest the IRGC in this network of patronage in the country in terms
of the money they make the economy that they're bound up with and all of that in society as
as Lee said it's a very layered thing and Katrina can we just talk for a couple of minutes about
UK US relations and all of this because initially Kirsta Amar said that he'd refuse to give
the American military permission to use bases that they have either in the UK or in British
territory abroad like Diego Garcia, subject of many episodes of newscast over the last couple of
years. Donald Trump then gave an interview to the telegraph newspaper on Monday morning where he
basically told off Kirsta Amar for doing that but almost exactly the same time Kirsta Amar had
changed his position and he now said he was going to give the go ahead to the Americans to use
British bases because it was now a matter of kind of self-defense for Britain because British
nationals and British allies were being attacked by Iran. What's your take on just what all of that
adds up to on Monday evening or at least Monday evening for us in the UK Monday lunchtime for you
in Washington? Yeah it's a very it's a very kind of fascinating one isn't it particularly when
you listen to what Kirsta Amar said in the House of Commons earlier on Monday you know he was talking
about how his weekend has been basically that he had faced this decision of going in with the US
in Israel at the outset on these offensive strikes and he had decided against that and said again
in that speech of the House of Commons that he doesn't support what they're doing he doesn't
support regime change by the air he questioned the legal standing in fact for what the US is doing
here but he said it had then become apparent when he looked at the sort of as you say the self-defense
element here in a request had come from the US to allow them to use UK bases that he now felt
that was in the best interests of the UK and crucially of the UK citizens he said he were in the
region about 300,000 UK citizens in the region and he feels that these bases are needed to help defend
those people against the Iranian retaliatory attacks but it's clearly been a lot of sort of
soul-searching has been involved for the Prime Minister over those few days he was being criticized
for sitting on the fence here essentially wasn't he but then with that speech in the House of Commons
very firmly laying out where he is and it's in a different place to what we're hearing from Donald
Trump about where he is and where the mission for this is and if it is to be as President Trump said
earlier four to five weeks that's going to make for some very very sticky and tricky conversations
between Kirsta Armour and Donald Trump and many other allies who want to stand alongside the US
but who just don't support the initial bases at least for what we're seeing here.
President Trump has expressed his disagreement with our decision not to get involved in the
initial strikes but it is my duty to judge what is in Britain's national interest
that is what I've done and I stand by it. Katrina I'm going to let you go because I know there's
lots of demands on your time as well but thank you very much for chatting to us today.
Okay talk to you and bye. And Jane what was the point?
Yeah I mean just picking up as Katrina said you know this goes on to four or five weeks.
We know what happens you know terrible things happen in terms of civilians being impacted.
I mean we've seen it we've seen it in Israel in Bateshamesh when 30-something people were killed
we've seen it most of all in Iran itself where a school was hit in Minab in the south
and school children died over 50 apparently and I think the death toll at the moment according
to the Iranian red crescent is 550 people so we know that there will be missiles that will go
astray and hit schools and hit civilian targets which makes all these decisions made by political
leaders very very fraught because what happens then if if a missile belonging to a you know
this come from a British plane or an American plane or it hits a civilian target as we've seen
in Iran and that the hitting of that school has caused enormous shock and anger in Iran and
actually in the region. And I mean this sounds a little bit parochial and there was no loss of
life here but the the Iranian drone strike on the RAF base in Cyprus RAF Akhratiere which even
though it's on the island of Cyprus that is British territory British sovereign territory
and the government was saying today that that drone strike they think was launched before the
government in the UK changed its mind about what support to provide to all of this so they're not
saying it was retaliation by Iran for kind of coup starmer upping the ante a bit but you can
already see that's now sparked off a side conversation about well how badly defended is that base
and actually is starmer weakened defense because he presides over a system where a British
a very important British base can be almost taken out of action very quickly by the Iranian
yeah and I mean spinning off into all sorts of different political I mean obviously going
back to the school that was hit in Iran it has to be said that the likely target was a revolution
regard naval base which is close by but you know this is what happens you know the the targets
in military and the casualties are often civilian so we would like to get your questions throughout
the week because I'm sure you've got loads and people like Lisa and Jane and Katrina are standing
by to answer them so email us newscast at bbc.co.uk or you can WhatsApp us on zero three three zero
one two three nine four eight zero and actually do you know what Jane I've got a question
on my own I might just land you with now I hope I can answer it well we can break through on
it together or we can just watch Lisa on the news now see if she can answer it on a ride or
meet you yes she got to that studio very very quickly and it's the it's back to and when Trump
was talking about the four things he's sort of targeting and why was one of them the Iranian navy
so I've got used to over the years that the Iranian nuclear negotiations were about enriching
uranium so you could make a nuclear bomb or not whether it was about ballistic missiles so rockets
that could be fired over long distances also Iran support for grips that hezbollah who were
causing chaos in in in other countries why do we think that the Iranian navies become such a
big deal well he has said a lot about the fact that he first of all he said nine Iranian
navy ships have been destroyed today it's gone up to ten he's just announced that I suppose
it's because there is this big floating flotilla of American ships in in in those waters and they
are susceptible to we know that the Iranians have for example I believe underground underwater drones
we know that they operate high high speed boats with explosives those are specific to the Islamic
republican guard and there they can be very difficult very very dangerous so I think he's
probably thinking about the threats to the American navy and the flotilla that there is there
which is why the Iranian navy has become number three in the in the four targets
excellent analysis on the spot um Jane come back against tomorrow please
looking forward to it thank you very much and that is the situation as it looks across the region
at five forty five on Monday the second of March and that's it for this episode of newscast
as Jane has promised should we back again tomorrow with another one with me bye bye newscast
newscast from the BBC well thank you for making it to the end of another newscast you clearly
ooze stamina can I gently encourage you to subscribe to us on BBC sounds and then without
having to do anything else on the andering charts will miraculously make its way to your phone
warning the following zippercruder radio spot you are about to hear is going to be filled with
f words when you're hiring we at zippercruder know you can feel frustrated for lore and even
like your efforts are futile and you can spend a fortune trying to find fabulous people only to get
flooded with candidates who are just fine fortunately zippercruder figured out how to fix all that
and right now you can try zippercruder for free at zippercruder.com slash zip with zippercruder you
can forget your frustrations because we find the right people for your roles fast which is our
absolute favorite f word in fact four out of five employers who post on zippercruder get a quality
candidate within the first day fantastic so whether you need to hire four 40 or 400 people
get ready to meet first rate talent just go to zippercruder.com slash zip to try zippercruder
for free don't forget that zippercruder.com slash zip finally that zippercruder.com slash zip



