What Joe Kent's resignation says about U.S. intelligence and counterterrorism efforts

All right.

Let's get another take on National Counterterrorism Director Joe Kent's resignation.

And for that, we hand it back over to Nick Schifrin.

To discuss Kent's comments about Iran and what his resignation says about the intelligence

community, I'm joined by Nick Rasmussen, who under the Obama administration directed the

National Counterterrorism Center, the same center from which Kent resigned today.

Nick Rasmussen, thanks very much.

Welcome back.

Thank you.

To the news hour, in the letter, Kent refutes the president and says Iran was not an imminent

threat.

We know about what Kent might have seen in the intelligence that would lead him to

so publicly go against the president.

Well, the question of imminence when you're talking about threats, national security threats

is not a black and white matter, as you can imagine.

And even in what director Kent put on the record with his letter today, he didn't speak

specifically to the nuclear threat or the threat to U.S. interest from terrorism or the threat

from, for example, Iran's ballistic missile program.

So in a sense, we don't know exactly what he was alluding to with his comments.

As I was saying a bit ago, the concept of imminence is not black and white.

It can have a very temporal component to it.

If the intelligence community, for example, were in possession of information that said or

suggested that an attack on U.S. interest was going to happen at this place on that day,

in this manner, that would certainly constitute an imminent threat.

But you can have imminence without having all of those elements as well.

If you feel like, and I say feel, if you feel like you don't have the ability to forecast

and project when an attack might happen, that might create a sense of imminence, even

if you don't have that specific intelligence giving you time and place.

Kent also says in the letter, it's a quote, a lie that there's a clear path to victory.

We don't really know what necessarily that means.

But U.S. officials have told me that the intelligence assessment is that the Iranian regime

is unlikely to fall, despite this war.

Is that the kind of thing that he would be saying that he would be talking about there?

Again, I don't really, obviously, have no insight into what the intelligence assessments

say right now about what Iran will look like in the aftermath of this campaign.

But I will say that most national security professionals, I know, on all political sides,

very much want to see the Iranian capability to carry out terrorist activity around the

world, to act aggressively against neighbors, to threaten the West, want to see that capability

degraded and diminished.

And so that is something I think on which there is pretty wide unanimity among intelligence

and national security professionals.

Bottom line, the NCTC is responsible for analyzing, assessing the threat, and integrating intelligence

both foreign and domestic.

So is that mission affected by his resignation today?

I mean, I'd like to think and I have confidence that the men and women who work at NCTC are still

doing exactly that work, Nick, in kind of keeping their eye on the ball, they're very mission-focused,

making sure that they have their eyes on every bit of available intelligence so that they

can prepare the best possible assessments to support policymakers up to and including

the president.

At the same time, anytime a leader is, you know, departs the scene, it can be a little

bit disruptive.

And I suspect the acting director, whoever he or she is, is moving to try to send signals

of stability and confidence to the workforce to keep them on track.

How much do we know whether the NCTC has been doing, whether Joe Kent has been doing that

role that we traditionally believe the NCTC has done, including under you?

Well, the organization has certainly been preparing, I would believe, the intelligence assessments

to undergird, or to support good policymaking and good decision-making.

As ever, it's a question of how those assessments are landing with the customer, Senator.

Right.

The customer, of course.

The ultimate IC customer is the president of the United States.

Exactly.

But I don't want to understate how important it is that that work go on even to support

those beyond the president.

For example, when you're thinking about the homegrown violent extremist threat here in

the United States, it's just as important I would argue that NCTC, along with FBI, the

Department of Homeland Security and CIA and other intel community partners, support the

state and local apparatus around the country as they try to worry and deal with potential

homegrown threats.

So that customer set is wide, deep, and very expansive.

But since the war has started, we have seen multiple homegrown attacks, some of which

it does seem to be to be inspired by the war, whether in Iran or in Lebanon with Hezbollah,

how much would the NCTC have been focused on that and how much will it be going forward?

They would certainly be focused on those kinds of attacks.

When an attack like that happens, along with FBI partners and other intelligence community

and law enforcement partners, they would be digging in to try to determine what motivated

this individual to carry out the attacks that were undertaken.

And I would surmise, we don't know the full answer to that.

We've seen some early press reporting as you suggested linking these attacks to what

happened in Iran or what's happening in Lebanon.

But that work probably continues with FBI and the lead as an investigative matter.

And just quickly in the last few seconds, we have overall zoom out for us.

Where is the overall counterterrorism effort for the United States today?

I mean, I worry a bit, but again, I'm used to worrying in the sense.

You always worry when you come from the background where you focus on terrorism and counterterrorism.

But I worry a little bit about the hollowing out of a workforce that has gotten younger

and less experienced over time with departures from government service, either voluntary

or involuntary, downsizing budget cuts, budget reductions, the shift in emphasis away from

counterterrorism and terrorism towards state competition, state conflict, and other administration

priorities to include immigration.

Nick Rasmussen, thank you very much.