Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
governmentJun 28, 202657:02pending

When the umpires are biased

About this episode

The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – Federal judges increasingly claim neutrality while advancing political preferences from the bench. Judicial rulings against Trump policies, immigration enforcement, and federal grand jury subpoenas raise questions about constitutional duty, impartiality, and whether the courts still function as umpires applying law, or as policymakers shaping outcomes through personal bias and agenda...

Get every episode summarized

Each time THE CONSTITUTION STUDY publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

When the umpires are biased

THE CONSTITUTION STUDY

0:00
57:02

More episodes

More from THE CONSTITUTION STUDY

View all episodes →