Loading...
Loading...

Hey, it's Howie Mandel and I'm inviting you to witness history as me and my Howie Do it gaming team take on Gilly the King and
wallow two six sevens million dollars gaming in an epic global gaming league video game showdown four rounds multiple games one winner
Plus a half-time performance by multi platinum artist Traviem McCoy watch all the action and see who wins in advances to the championship match
Against Neo right now at global gaming league dot com. That's global gaming league dot com everybody games
Coming up next on passion struck. We know that the from studies of FMR I brain scan of people who are recently romantically in love and people were passionately in love
It is a very much parallel to addiction in the brain and in fact romantic rejection studies of people who have gone through breakups
They the brain looks remarkably like someone going through with drug withdrawal particularly cocaine withdrawal
Which helps explain why breakups can feel so intense and emotionally physically. It's why people feel physical pain with breakups that
I'm always a little cautious of calling it an addiction, but it is very parallel to addiction and I'm part because we're so used to addictions being negative and love is
Positively balanced one for the most part
Welcome to passion struck. I'm your host John Miles
This is the show where we explore the art of human flourishing and what it truly means to live like it matters
Each week I sit down with change makers creators scientists and everyday heroes to decode the human experience and
Uncover the tools that help us lead with meaning heal what hurts and pursue the fullest expression
The who were capable of becoming whether you're designing your future developing as a leader or seeking deeper alignment in your life
This show is your invitation to grow with purpose and act with intention
Because the secret to a life of deep purpose connection and impact is choosing to live like you matter
Hey friends, and welcome back to episode
745 a passion struck throughout this life beyond the script series
We've been exploring what happens when the assumptions we've lived by about identity
success health and purpose
Stop working, but there's another script most of us inherit without ever questioning it the script about love about
Relationships about what it means to feel connected in a world that has never been more digitally
Lent yet often feels profoundly lonely earlier in this series
We've explored how biology shapes resilience with Dave Asprey
emotional strength influences physical health with Dr. Tara Nourula and how technology is reshaping entire systems of care
With Dr. Robert Wackter today we turn to something even more fundamental
intimacy because beneath achievement
Stannis and productivity most people are searching for one thing to feel seen to feel chosen to feel like they matter to someone
My guest today is Dr. Justin Garcia
Evolutionary biologist executive director of the Kinsey Institute and author of the new book the intimate animal
The science of sex, fidelity and why we live and die for love in this conversation
We explore a provocative idea humans didn't just evolve to survive. We evolved to bond
Justin explains how pair bonding touch sexual desire attachment and connection are deeply rooted in our biology
And why modern life is disrupting those systems in ways we're only beginning to understand we discuss the evolutionary roots of romantic love and
Parabonding we go into why Gen Z is both craving connection and delaying relationships
How technology is reshaping dating attraction and intimacy the underlying paradox between commitment and novelty and why touch
deprivation may be one of the most hidden crises of modern life as Justin explains
intimacy isn't a luxury it's infrastructure for human flourishing before we dive in a quick ask if this episode
Resonates with you sure it was someone who might benefit from it
You can also watch the full conversations on our YouTube channels and if you haven't yet leaving a rating review on Apple podcast or Spotify
Helps more people discover these conversations now. Let's dive into my conversation with Dr. Justin Garcia
Thank you for choosing passion struck and choosing me to be your hosting guide on your journey to creating an intentional life that matters now let that journey begin
Have you ever looked up at the clock and realized it's noon and you've had nothing but coffee
That was me recently the morning just vanished
Meetings emails everything and suddenly I was starving and completely off track
That's why I've been keeping a cool black edition on hand
On days when I'm sprinting out the door I grab a ready-to-drink bottle
It's a complete meal with 35 grams of protein
27 essential vitamins minerals no artificial sweeteners and it actually keeps me full for hours and it's under five bucks
Then when I'm home and want something more customizable
I use the black edition powder blend it with ice add fruit or nut butter
Same complete nutrition just the different vibe
Honestly, this combo has become my insurance policy against chaotic days
Limited time offer get fuel today with my exclusive offer of 15% off online with my code passion at
Hewll.com slash passion new customers only. Thank you to Hewll for partnering and supporting our show
I am absolutely thrilled today to welcome Dr. Justin Garcia on passion strap Justin
It's so great to see you today. How are you? I'm great. I'm thrilled to be with you
I we're going to get to talk about a lot of important parts of what it means to be human
We're here today to discuss your brand new book the intimate animal the science of sex fidelity and why we live in dye or
It love and when I got the book one of the first things I realized is that it features a blurb from a mutual friend Emily Morse
You know Emily
Everyone should know Emily. She's such a brilliant sex educator and has done such a good job at helping
Everyone of all walks of life and particularly the public really understand what we do as sex researchers and how we apply that to our lives
Which is a long time friend. We've had some opportunities to events together and someone who's work
I really respect and admire. It's not easy to always talk about sex and sexuality and
public spaces and to do it in a way that
Honors that honors the complexity of our sex lives and treats it with respect and Emily does that better than anyone
Well, Emily and I are both huge Michigan fans
So that's one of the ties for us
But I remember when she was telling me when she got her doctorate
It was one of the first doctorate's ever in the study of sex or intimacy
Yeah, which was really interesting to see over the past 15 to 17 years what she has done with it
So and it speaks to a larger I think Pat on even still today so many people who study sex and sexuality
I have colleagues if they're only one in their department who studies sexuality
They're the only one in their college on their campus that studies sexuality
We're in a really fortunate position here at the Kinsey Institute
I run up and down the hall and we're probably the largest concentration of sex and relationship researchers in the world and
There's historians and psychologists and biologists and physicians and we bring all this just in different disciplinary
Perspective to bear every one of their own theories and methods and
But it could be hard to study sexuality it hard difficult to get funding difficult to get jobs difficult
So it's a still a
Complex and misunderstood part of the scientific arena. Well, it certainly is another thing
I just wanted to throw it at you as you probably don't talk to too many podcasts host who's
Two siblings both went to IU. Oh really. I hope you were celebrating the football game this year
My brother was at the semi-final game and we were definitely celebrating and there's a lot to be said about relationships and connection and fandom and
So these are questions somewhere in there
Justin recently because of what you were just talking about I've
tried to do a couple episodes that are deep diving relationships
I want to be as was Paul Eastwick and
Another one I was lucky enough to get Harry Reese and Sanyu Levermeersky to come on together
Which was cool to have the preeminent expert in happiness and relationships come on to discuss it
But we went in to kind of how
compatibility forms and relationships and how
Responsiveness actually makes people feel love what I wanted to ask you is from an evolutionary perspective
Why would the human brain and body
be designed to depend so deeply on intimacy at all?
I love John you jumped right into the deep men and I think it's such a big question and for all of us this idea that
We understand the role of intimacy of connection of love in our lives
It's a profound people do intense things for our romantic and sexual desires and our relationships
people around the world live and die for love and
But why as an evolutionary biologist the question is why is that and I think there's a couple of ways we can and shouldn't answer that as we unpack it
The one part of that is that a lot of researchers have argued
that
We have patterns of what we call social monogamy or pair bonding that we're a pair bonding species
So what that means is that we form these intense
Romantic bonds and when biologists talk about pair bonds if we're talking about other species we say
Mutual territory defense mutual nest building mutual raising of offspring that mutual part is really important that you have a
Close partner that you're weathering life with and typically as evolutionists were thinking about survival and reproduction
So the evidence would suggest that our species our ancestors hominins were engaging in
pair bonding behavior for over four million years and
a little bit more in some
according to some anthropologists and
so for us what that was about was survival and reproduction and I think it's important to remember both of those
So on the one hand on reproduction
We know that as humans continue to evolve and to what we know is
Anatomically modern humans that having a pair bond partner to defend offspring to be
We just date for nine to ten months it takes years and years for to raise children to the time to be able to do anything on their own
That is part of a
Natural history that pair bonds helped us to invest in development and growth
As a species only about three to five percent of mammals engage in that pair bonding behavior
So it's also relatively unique
That's the one lever is about reproduction
The other is about survival and one thing I argued in the instrument animal is I
Think more and more we can understand that pair bonds also evolved to allow us to weather uncertainty to respond to changing environments
social environments physical environments
We had a partner co-pilot to go through life with to manage ups and downs and predators and resources and in many ways
That's what's allowed our species to really dominate the globe
So I think there's a couple of different evolutionary pieces that play there and then the next live levels
Then we start to see the mechanisms. What's going on in the brain and Marba physiology that all back up this idea that we have that our deep
Sense of connection to others is biological
Yeah, why love that that topic because it's one that I've been studying myself now almost two decades and
I have my own book coming up coming out on this in October
I titled the mattering effect, but I really trace
This this loss of shared connection and its consequences and then go into kind of how do you rebuild it?
But something I saw in your book and something I've been studying really connected
I started looking at loneliness helplessness
People burned out people disengaged people broken and I said there has to be something in common with all of these
And for me that commonality is
mattering but you saw that a connection is also there with 40% of U.S. adults being single
And these things on the other side rising globally
What's the connection point?
Yeah, I love that and I like this idea of mattering and I think we're
Talking about different facets of the same diamond here, which is exciting that
The part for me intimacy is this idea of being seen and heard and known that but sometimes researchers talk about the
Need to belong that we young we have a pretty good understanding from biologist psychologists
Lot of social behavioral scientists that humans have a need to feel connected to others
We are a social primate through and through we we want to feel connected
But it's not just the having connections in many ways
We are more connected than ever before in our evolutionary history
We can log on to social media there's thousands of people
We can be on a subway and interact with thousands of people
You've been a restaurant and interact with hundreds of people
But we also have more people in our phone or on our social media
But it's the quality of those connections
And I think for me the paradox in all of this what you're talking about John and loneliness and is
How are we more connected but we seem to be struggling with loneliness?
So it's not
How is it that people are have psychological loneliness when they wake up in a bed next to a partner every morning or
They have all these people that they're talking to on social media
That is for me an issue of quality. It's the nature of the relationships. It's the depth of the connections
To use a word that you just use
Do those connections matter in their life to them?
Do they feel like they are someone that you could actually rely on in a time of need?
Do they feel that you're someone you can rely on on a time of need?
Parabond relationships in the best case
Well, when they're highly satisfying in terms of romantic and sexual satisfaction and
Relationship quality
Our partners are people that we think are going to catch us when we fall that we feel that we feel that there's a depth to those bonds and connections
That's what I think is our big issue as I talk about it as an intimacy crisis
But it's almost thinking of it as a level above this loneliness epidemic
It's well, what's going on that we're that we just don't feel connected to all the people around us
And that's my sort of entry point to a lot of that. I'm curious. What do you think too? I can't wait to read your book
I've been trying to really get my arms around this because what I'm saying is that
mattering is breaking down in our families in our intimate relationships in our work environments in our communities
So it is a common throughput and when I think about intimacy
When we say connection that's what a lot of people think of mattering
But I recently had a really interesting dialogue with Rebecca Goldstein
I'm not sure if you're familiar with her. She's a
Philosopher she just came out with a book called The Mattering Instinct
But she and I both believe
Something that's a little bit different than what most people are saying when I think of connection
I'm thinking of
The relational aspect that you have with someone else when I am thinking about mattering
I think about our own human operating system and what I think is happening is
mattering is the foundation for connection. It is the foundation for meaning
But when people don't feel themselves like they matter
I think that's where this
gap
That I call the mattering gap starts if you don't feel like you matter to yourself
If you don't feel like you are seen
Etc. How are you ever going to feel that you could be intimate with someone?
How are you going to connect with someone else?
And so I think where this starts breaking down is
In how we ourselves have lost mattering via a series
It's decades worth of micro collapses that end up happening to us. So it's not like we just wake up
And we suddenly feel this it's almost burnout. It happens gradually. What do you think about that?
Yeah, I really I like that and I think and I'm gonna if I can build on that what I really like about that is
This idea that if you're in a power bond relationship if you have a romantic paper now you can also have best friends and family that
Romantic bonds aren't the only source of this
But inherent to a romantic relationship is that you rely on each other you lean on each other you at times need each other
And I think sometimes I hear folks say well, I don't want a partner that needs me or that I need them
That's unrealistic. That's the part of if you're in a long haul with a close romantic bond
There will be days and moments that you need you rely on each other and you benefit from each other you grow from each other
that
Knowing that there's a beauty, but there's also a deep satisfaction that comes with
Knowing that I could show up from my partner that I because I matter for them
It gives a sense of a sense of purpose now. It doesn't mean that you live only for serving them
Like couples sometimes joke about that my wife and I's been joke about that. They watch your purpose
This is taking care of you honey, and you don't want that should be the only purpose
But to know that you're there to support to be each other's best self
Something you said John, I really like though it makes me think of this new data we have and I'm curious
Maybe we can work think on this puzzle on this together. We have a new study
That we did in partnership with match group
We found that about 80% of Gen Z say that they want romantic love in their life
But 45% don't think that they're ready. They think that they have to work on themselves more
That and then we ask in different areas. They have to work on themselves
And what I'm making of that of what you just said in that news this new study we have
I think somewhere what's getting lost particularly for young people is
The translating the how-to part of that if saying that they think in order
I worry that too many people nearly have think that in order to have that mattering
They need to just go work on themselves in isolation
And I don't think that that's actually the answer
I don't think that's the path to get there that we need to work on yourself
That relationships can be a vessel they for
Figuring out who you are and what you want in the best cases and thriving together and experiencing the world together
So I'm curious the jump between I think you nailed it. There's this piece of feeling connected
A feeling needed of having purpose
But I worry that too many especially among the young and I think this is where we're seeing burnout in relationships and dating
As they think they need to go solve this mystery somewhere on their own on the peak of amount
and in fact
Dating and connecting with people are a place to learn that before we continue
I want to pause for a moment one of the central ideas and the life beyond the script series is that transformation
Isn't only about changing what you do. It's about understanding what you need as a human being on the united life.net
I'm publishing companion reflections and articles for every episode in this series designed to help you examine your own life
Because awareness creates insight but intentional action creates change
If you want to explore the reflections for this episode visit the ignited life.net
And I also want to thank our sponsors for supporting the show their support makes these conversations possible now a quick break for our sponsors
You're listening to passion strap right here on the passion struck network
Now let's return to the discussion with Dr. Justin Garcia
So a couple things I was not aware of that study and I find it interesting because I have two kids who are Gen Z
Oh, okay
both who find
Dating now very complicated especially the older one who's 27
But it's really interesting because when we grew up there was much more of you just jump into it and figure it out
Right
Then trying to make yourself perfect and I think
Oftentimes you get years into a relationship and then realize you need to do some of that internal work
But if you keep delaying it because we both know how difficult it is for people to do that work
It often keeps getting put off until it's never done
It really does delay that inception point
When you feel like you're ready to be in a relationship now you can look at this from my own perspectives
I was married for over two decades and we ended up getting divorced and I went through a phase where like many people
I dated a lot because I was trying to figure out
What type of mate do I want to have in my life going forward and I knew I didn't want the same thing I had before
But I reached a point where I realized I needed to take some time
For myself to figure a few things out or the relationship I really wanted
Wasn't going to happen until I worked on a couple of core pieces
So I do think that had I not done that I probably wouldn't be married today and one to have met the woman that I have so I see the need for it
but
It does beg a real big question of if you keep putting that off
How long are you going to keep putting it off for and where you do it how we work on ourselves
I worry that particularly for the young they
don't see
interpersonal interactions and relationships and dating it as that
That's a context within which we work with ourselves and relationships we grow together you expect to grow together
not to just show up preformed and
Hit play and that's it
Just one of the things that you describe in the book is a core paradox
We as humans are wired for pair bonding but not necessarily strip sexual monogamy
How does that tension shape modern love?
Yeah
Thanks for the opportunity to talk about this because I think it really is one of the key tensions
That explain so much of the ups and downs in our relationships
So one of the arguments I'm making into an animal and my colleagues and I've made an academic articles
Is that humans have this tendency for pair bonding sort of what we call so maybe let me take one step back as a biologist
We don't I don't talk about monogamy
We don't typically talk about a species that's monogamous in the same way that we tend to in the human sciences or in the public
And what I mean by that is we talk about two different pieces of monogamy
There's social monogamy which is the pair bond that's the relationship structure
And there's sexual monogamy which is fidelity that's your mating behavior
And that they actually have two different mechanisms in the brain what's going on in terms when we form a deep romantic bond to someone and our interest in sexual variety are different mechanisms
And in some ways they're different evolutionary pressures different levers in some sense
That we had this pressure
Evolutionary selection pressure to form pair bonds is good for survival and reproduction
But then also pressure for sexual variety and diversity because that can be helpful if there's disease or if they have more variation
Maintains levels of competition
What the way I think of relationships is when people say are we monogamous?
This is a complicated question. We have an actual history a tendency to form intense pair bonds typically with one person at time
Although not everyone was interesting work on polyamory for instance most people tend to form one at a time
and
There's always variation as a new evolutionary biologist I've read and butter is diversity of traits is always variation
and
Then this question a sexual novelty
And I think in many relationships we can come to understand that tension as I have a primary relationship
And then there's infidelity occurs or I feel like it's going to work or I'm worried about it occurring
And all the management of jealousy and make guarding and all the stuff that goes into this infidelity stuff
But in fact what can happen you're in a primary relationship you the drive for sexual novelty can pull us towards infidelity
Or for some people it pulls them towards opening up their relationship and we're talking more and more about that and
publicly about different ways that people are expanding relationships or trying to open relationships
consensual non monogamy polyamory and
That's another way to address that tension the other way to address that tension and the one that I think when we understand we can harness as we could say
Okay, I have a desire for sexual novelty
But I also have this long-term pair bond
Well, we can take that desire for sexual novelty and pull it into our relationship
So then we say let's do things in the context of our partner better new and exciting that activates the dopamine systems in the brain
And I don't necessarily need to be pulled elsewhere to get that
I can do it in my relationship
But it takes some effort and it takes understanding that seeing it and working towards it as a couple
To do new things whether that's in the bedroom sexual novelty or it's taking vacations taking cooking classes
Walking around a different parking your neighborhood
There's also there's a big range of ways that we can get our sense of novelty in our lives
It really is interesting especially for someone with my background who I grew up in a very
religious Catholic family want to
Prokyo schools for my entire school and through high school and was taught since I could breathe that being in a monogamous
Relationship is the only sanctity of God and I'm sure a lot of the listeners probably share some of that core
That core background I do so how do you
Like differentiate between spiritual core like that and
What some people are now experimenting with that seems to be on the opposite side of that
I think the interesting thing about when my work what I really enjoy is that we can understand that we have
Evolutionary tendencies or motivational systems, but they're always subject to any ecology. They're always subject to
Social context ecological context whether that's religion or whether that's a particular country or or culture or
So people structure relationships in very different ways around the world sometimes it's based on resources sometimes it's based on
Religious edict for instance, there's multiple religions that allow people to have multiple spouses
But in there you often see things about
So for instance in the Quran you can have multiple wives, but you need to be able to provide for all of them equally
So it's not that it's a free rate, but it's a swinging party. It's actually a
Religiously influenced way that you can expand the family
But you have to honor that there's multiple families there there's multiple pair bonds there's multiple children
So when you dig when we dig into how different religion structure these things I think there's often
An interesting story and for me that's different from I'm on the one hand thinking about the biology of love bonds
And then everything else is about how
Culture religion marital agreements all of those things give us guidance on how to structure
That those desires structure those so
In the cases of I think the in the cases of religious groups or that
Really phone in on marriage and monogamy
Well, then the question is okay, but where are we getting on that's a great example of okay
But are we cultivating a desire for novelty and that relationship
And at times when you turn the screws so tight about so much regulation and people's intimate lives
They sometimes can develop what my late colleague Helen Fisher would call frustration attraction
So you tell them they can't do somebody tell someone they can't do something and we start to get more interested in it
So that there's paradoxes there for instance
Some of the highest consumption of sex toys and pornography is in the us Bible belt in the country
So the region characterizes the highest religiosity
I don't say that as a moral statement one way or the other what is the data tell us about when you're very restrictive about information
Sex education
Thinking about people's diverse romantic and sexual lives people start seeking it out
And they start they have almost a greater craving for that seeking. I'm always cautious about when we
Think about how we regulate aspects of people's romantic and sexual lives
On the other hand to the point of your question that I didn't answer yet
I'm sorry about
The part about our spiritual selves and how we bring them to our relationships
There's also a whole lot of satisfaction that can come for people when they think about well
How do I think about my romantic and sexual life?
And is it part of a spiritual experience and journey and is it important that we align because
With what social sciences call homophily we tend to be attracted to people of with similar backgrounds as ourselves
Sometimes it's based on religion sometimes race
Increasingly we're seeing in our data. It's political orientation
So it's your your party of our political party affiliation
But we tend to look for people that we can understand
With religion and spirituality. They're often super ordinacles. It's about like our purpose in life and a realigning on that
That can add a lot of depth to our romantic relationship
And it can also add a lot of depth I think to people's sexual experiences
But we have to do it within the confines of what makes us comfortable
And if you're coming from a religious or spiritual background
Sometimes some thinking of some of that
That capturing that novelty can make us uncomfortable really uncomfortable
Now if we're uncomfortable particularly if we don't feel safe
Psychological safety
Then you shut down all the mechanisms for mating for connection for sexual interest
So we have to balance that desire for newness with a sense of feeling safe and connected
So since I open the door to marriage
I want to talk about modern families for a second
One thing that I interpreted reading the book is that humans evolved as cooperative breeders where
Care is shared across our groups that we exist in throughout history and in modern families
What I think ends up happening more and more is that one person
Seems to become the fixer or the emotional rock that's carrying everything in the relationship
Does evolutionary science suggest that this kind of one way investment that ends up happening
Is a distortion to our natural design and impacts the vitality of that family unit or that intimate bond
Is an important question and gets at how we structure our relationships
And in some ways I know you mentioned Paul Eastwick's wonderful work
And in some ways he's thinking about these notions of compatibility and his work really nuanced ways that I enjoy
And so my take on this is particularly I remember watching Renee Brown give an interview once
And she said that her she and her partner will sometimes say as my cup fills today
Like how much can I bring and it's I've only got 10% in my cup today. So you bring 90%
and
I think that for so I want to start with that because that reminds us that relationships are dynamic and sometimes our efforts
Are situational they're not necessarily always now if you are in a relationship that's always lopsided
That for some people that can work sometimes someone's more much more of a caretaker month more of a caregiver
That sometimes can work
But by and large what we know is that long term that can create problems that creates resentment and creates jealousy
It creates frustration
But the part that is more complex that researchers are questions researchers continue to understand
are that when
those
distributions of effort or investment that they are situational so my wife and I friends has had a baby recently
That there are days that one of us has more energy than the other there are days that you know some of us that they're
Especially probably say these my wife's recovering and now that's an intense life experience and you're balancing that
But there's all sorts of things there's you get a new promotion. You do a reorganization at work
You are writing a book something you
Check out your both right thinking about you're in the final stages of finishing that book
You're not always functional at the dinner table at night and when we can understand that our relationships are dynamic
And then our lives are dynamic that there are moments and sometimes it's not just a day
It's a season sometimes things are intense at work for three four six months and how you navigate that
And then the best case the couple the relationship becomes your source of hey
Can I need to lean on you a little bit more right now because I trust and confide in you
It's actually the thing that we see in our studies over and over though
Then people most want their romantic partner is someone they can trust and confide in
For exactly these reasons. Okay. Here's I'm in the season that I need to trust and confide you. I can't go up fully
But in the best case it's with the promise of but I'm coming back as soon as I get a handle on work
As I turn the book in as I get over the surgery as I'm not so sleep deprived whatever it is that that then
We get back
So I think that it can be
Unhelpful to think of relationships is needing to split your effort
That there's some formula that we have to follow because it doesn't leave us the reap the real the it's that
So divorced from the real world of the push and pull that we all experience in our lives that we show up with in our relationships
but
When it's when it feels permanently sl as tilted or that there's no way forward
There's no working together towards a goal to get back to it
That can create a frustration now. There are exceptions like there are to everything as you can know
They're I think in up cases of relationships like sugar baby cut cut relationships that
There's something built in those the sort of transactional aspects that are present in all relationships
That maybe the what one is providing is different
So maybe it's one is providing more financial resources and others more domestic resources or emotional resources
And when we start to think of that it gets complicated quickly
But I'm hesitant to say that the literature the available academic literature tells us
A clear story of whether that's good or bad
I think we're understanding more and more that it can vary and that there's a lot of nuance to when it plays out in the real world
But we do know that permanent
Lopsidedness of effort that will create on a relationship real fast if there's not a sense of it's the same thing as long distance relationships
If you're a long distance for two years where you're working on your masters. Okay, we have a plan
We can figure it out if you move to the other part of the world and who knows when we're gonna see each other
There's no end site. There's no end inside for both of us. There's no goal that we work towards that really is a challenge for a relationship
Yeah, I spent a number of years in the military and I was just reading this article on there's a current
Carrier task force that was deployed last June
And they were the ones who were down in South America when we were down there
And supposed to come back home they were already overdue and now they've been sent to the Middle East and they're not even there yet
So by the time they're done whatever they're doing and then have to transverse the whole way home you can him you can
I understand how for the five six thousand people that this is impacting how difficult that could be
for their relationships and the social support that they're gonna need when they're back home and they're
I love that you bring this up junk because I think in so many areas of our life whether it's physical health now
I'm in now I'm in your territory. So
Correct me, but I think in our physical health and our mental health and our careers that knowing that
Our relationships can be a source of our flourishing of our thriving
But I think one of the things I tried to deal with in the book was
To when we understand the science of our romantic and sexualized can we honor it?
Can we respect it? Can we cultivate it?
Because exactly that's a great case of people are away and then they get moved around again and moved around again
Hey, they got to get back to their relationships and be present for them because in the long run
We know that having that support that emotional support is better for everyone's
Health physical health psychological health their performance at work their ability to focus their ability to thrive
So I think we need relationship prescriptions to really focus in on our
Relationships because there's such a source of our well-being and when they're disrupted
They can be such a source of distraction and pain and heartache
For us
For sure, I know when I was in those
deployments were tough on their relationship
Especially when they happened in quips succession or when they went way over do
And your mind is expecting it to be a certain duration and that's what you're preparing for and then it keeps getting elongated
It doesn't help well. I want to go back to the relationship angle
And we were talking earlier about Gen Zs and how
More and more of them are waiting to get in these relationships, but oftentimes
We get into a relationship and then one of the things that really fascinates me is mate guarding
Why does that happen so early in relationships even in so many cases before
exclusivity is even defined in the relationship
And I think that is it's evolutionary and we know that a lot of animals do this and some do it more intensely than others
I remember this example I was watching Red Wind Blackbirds in a nature reserve in upstate New York and
A male and female that were a pair bonded birds about 90% of birds will pair bond at least for breeding season
And another male came one male flew off and then another male came in tried to mate with the female
And then the first male came back and the two of them grappled and they fought each other
Then they fell into the reeds around this pond and only one flew out
And it's why we sometimes say mother nature is red and tooth and claw and
When we invest in a pair bond we invest
Now we in humans humans we talk about emotional investment romantic investment
But all of us that any species that when you invest in
And courtship and you invest in a partnership
But also to the question you really ask often before you've really said it
We actually a couple what's going on here where I'm make guarding ready one you psychologically and emotionally start to invest
You start thinking of a future with someone you start hoping for more connection with someone
You we can activate all those make guarding mechanisms
And then we try to protect our investment and when I say protect part of that means making sure you're saved
We do that when we care about people typically not always
We also know that there are people who are in unhealthy relationships and that they make each other less save
and
But so part of it is
Connecting you but then the other is protecting the relationship and what comes with that is jealousy
Make guarding it's trying to keep other people away because I've already built this connection this emotional connection
So I want to keep everyone else away who thinks that they can build a connection
And pull you away from what I've already started thinking and dreaming and hoping and desiring
And I was also going to say I think there's also a component of this that romantic love does resemble
Addiction or anxiety on a neurobiological level
So I think that comes into it too because you can get addicted to a person
Very quickly
Exactly and there's a lot of evidence that romantic love what goes on
So we know that the from studies of FMRI brain scan of people who are recently romantically in love and people are passionately in love
It is a very much parallel to addiction and the brain and in fact romantic rejection studies of people who have gone through breakups
They the brain looks remarkably like someone going through with drug withdrawal particularly cocaine withdrawal
Which helps explain why breakups can feel so intense and emotionally physically. It's why people feel physical pain with breakups
that
I'm always a little cautious of calling it an addiction, but it is very parallel to addiction and I
And part because we're so used to addictions being negative and love is
A positively balanced one for the most part
But part for people who study sex and relationships
We're always cautious about the notion of sex addiction
So then when we talk about love addiction and so I said wow it's something different
And but you're right it really is I really do think of it as an as like an addiction. We it's a repetitive reward
It's we like being around the beloved we fantasize with them
It's the way that psychologists describe romantic love. It's focused attention and trusive thought obsessive thinking
So there's euphoria that comes with that, but there's also a craving that comes with it
Just one of the things I've been spending my time on recently is in addition to you
I've recently interviewed bearish warts talking about relational choice theory and I've got Alvin Roth coming on where we're talking about
Choiceology as well and when I think about our choices. I think about agency and when I think about love
I realize it's partly chemical
So how much agency or choice do we really have in choosing it?
Yeah, this is a great question and I think actually we do have a lot
I think we have a lot and that so we know that
One way we can look at that is what do we understand first for people who choose their partners versus arranged marriages
And in the studies on arranged marriage about three years in the satisfaction levels are fairly similar to what we call love marriage
Someone where you pick your own partner yourself
Now there's a lot that's to unpack there though and most cultures that practice arranged marriage one
It's culturally understood that it's something that you do
But also people for the most part and that's probably the written a lot about this you can reject a partner
You maybe your families are setting you up and you go no way it's not gonna happen
I think that sometimes in particularly in the North America
We have a view that arranged marriages. Oh someone just got plucked out of nowhere
And you're gonna meet them tomorrow and marry them
And that's not real people plays out in cultures the practices
and
The so that tells us something that satisfaction can grow
I also think in our singles in America study that we did with my colleague Amanda Gesselman
We've asked people
Things about like love at first sight or if they are attracted to someone when they fall in love with someone
We found that over 70% of people have become deeply attracted to someone that they initially didn't think they were
And over a third of fallen in love with someone that they wouldn't have initially predicted
That's why I'm a big advocate of second dates and third dates
But I think it's also a reminder that when we talk about attraction and we talk about love
Yes, there's a biology to it and there are some people were attracted to more than others
But a lot of that attraction takes time to build that that chemistry is dynamic
That the biology of love as you fall in love with someone
It's not just how they look or how they smell or how they
sound it's also
Again, is it someone you can trust and confide in is it someone who is nice?
Is it someone who's funny?
It's someone who you think listens to you and hears you and sees you back to that intimacy piece
You could be across table from someone who's handsome or gorgeous and is there this person doesn't even know I'm here
And those are the relational dynamics that take time
So I think that as much as it is a biological process that doesn't mean it's instantaneous
Doesn't mean that you know right away
In fact, all the evidence suggests that love takes time to cultivate and to pull all those things out of someone
so
I think in that case it's
We shouldn't let the biology drive our decisions
We should make our decisions and then enjoy it and as we understand what we're experiencing
Understand the craving that comes for a person understand that it takes time to really activate some of those
Because we're looking for information about trust, health, kindness that can take time
So for me, it's understanding the biology makes the whole process richer and more pleasurable
We shouldn't just wait to be hidden ahead with feelings of
Limerons adds not necessarily the best driver
When I think about mating and intimacy
evolutionary wise
for millennia
We have, as humans, been able to find partners without technology
And when you think of modern technology
The internet really came online in the mid-90s
And dating apps came in line much after that
But when I talk to a lot of gen
zears now and even millennials
And you ask them about going out and socializing and finding a mate
A lot of them tell me that's not even where it happens anymore
You have to do it online
And it just leads me to shaking my head in many ways
Because when I think of dating apps
They've expanded the possibilities globally
And you talk a lot about this in your chapter 3
But as we were just talking about choices
They also introduce decision overload
Unrealistic expectations, instability
And in some ways, I think it's made it worse than what we once had before
But how do you think they're in some ways expanding connection
But in other ways, industrializing rejection
And people not being able to find mates
I love that you bring this up because I think at its core
They're doing both and that's the challenge
I think there's so many of us want to have a hot take
And online dating and app dating is a great, is it terrible, is it frustrating, is it exciting
It's both, it's all of those things
And it's one we're meeting
We're seeing the technology meeting people where they are
Which is on apps and websites
And to your point, our data show that it is the most common way that singles
Oh well over 100 million singles in the United States
As you mentioned earlier
Over close to 40% of the adult population at any given time
That the number one place that singles are meeting their most recent date is on an app or a website
Farm more than bars or clubs or church or school or friends
In that sense, they are working
They are the place that people are meeting partners
And relationships are forming and marriages are forming
And for many people, particularly let's say LGBTQ people
They're far safer than walking into a bar
Now, if you're in New York with Miami
You might be thinking saying what is this guy talking about
But in many places in the world, if you're LGBTQ
How do you find someone else in your community
Are you safe walking into a place to try to pick someone up
So they offer a level of getting through the noise
To find someone that aligns with what you're looking for
Particularly if you're a sexual gender minority
We have multinational data where we found that women, for instance in India and Turkey
In countries that are characterized by less gender egalitarianism
They find online and updating much safer than dating in initial courtship
Face to face because they have more control in a digital context
So I think there's a lot of opportunity
There's also, if you want to find someone of the same religion
Of the same ethnic background
With the same hobbies, with the same kink, with the same allergies
Whatever
That we have these opportunities to do that with these technologies
So I think there's extraordinary opportunity
All right, that's the pro
The challenge is as you also suggested that there's information overload
That our brains are not equipped for the idea that you can swipe 3000 partners before lunch
Potential partners before lunch
And that's where we get into this problem of
You connect with someone and you just often think
Yeah, but I can, you're not really perfect
But I can get back on the app and swipe for a little bit more and find someone closer to my perfect
So we ruminate on our ideals
And it goes back to what you and I were just talking about
It forgets that so much of our relationship
So much of what we're attracted to
That comes out over time
So you're focused on these instantaneous ideals
And not on getting to know someone
All the excitement and fun that comes from expansion
Upself exploring the world
It's boring who you are
Who I am
Who we are together
That the apps can help cause us to lose sight of that
Of the beauty of the sort of engagement of going on actual dates getting to know someone
So there I think those that's the complexity there
There's a lot of opportunity
But we struggle with the data
We struggle with the sheer volume of opportunity
And when the brain thinks that we have an unlimited resource
We have a really hard time focusing on the person in front of us
The other side of it just and for me is
I think we're biologically wired for touch and closeness
And when intimacy for so many people is becoming mostly digital
It just makes me wonder if we outpaced our evolutionary design for intimacy
Through the use of technology
And is that one of the biggest things that's causing this huge gap
That we're seeing for Gen Z that we started the whole discussion with
I love that and as a social primate back to being a social primate
We know that touch is important
And it's that's whether it's licking and grooming behavior
That we see in many including primates
The 15% of primates engage in parabolic
And we know that touch is important
We learn a lot of information
Sensory information through touch
My colleague Michelle Drew
And I'm looking at my bookshelf looking at her book
writes about and her book she calls it a touch
Famine that we're experiencing in her book out of touch
And I love that phrase
And it's a reminder to your point John
It's not just singles who are looking for a we did a study
Here at the Kinsey Institute Amanda and I on
We found that a third of Mary of partnered people were long-term partner
34.4% I still remember the statistics
Say that they're not touched enough by their romantic partner
That's a pretty high number of people in relationships who say they're not being touched enough
No less people who are single who are looking for that connection
And that it's part of our legacy
I totally agree with you
We are a social primate
We want to feel connected
And when we say feel connected it's in the full sensory experience
We want to be heard both metaphorically and literally
We want to be seen we want to be felt
Want to be known
This is where I want to end things
Your subtitle is
Why we live and die for love
And a lot of the work that I've been doing
I really look at how the verification of our existence
Is a primary requirement for us to feel like we have meaning
So going to what I was just saying
If our intimacy is biologically tied to flourishing in our survival
Is the deepest team in drive ultimately
To feel known chosen and verified by another person
I think that we have particularly those of us that study
Relationships mating sexuality
I think we've focused a lot on the evolutionary drives for sex
Because it's so obviously related to sexual reproduction
And in so doing we've ignored
The enormous role and importance for the evolutionary drive for connection
Particularly for intimate connection
And how much of our lives that shapes
Including the other including the reproductive piece
But also
Evolution doesn't necessarily
When we talk about thriving and flourishing
Evolution is really about survival
And but we have the capacity to thrive
To move beyond the survival and reproduction
But we can only do that when we meet the conditions
For survival and the connection
That being part of a social fabric and feeling connected
Have a meaningful connection
Intimate connection
That's when we are able to do what humans can do
So well and that is to thrive and to flourish
And to enjoy our lives
So I yes my short answer is yes
I think that the more we understand of the science of intimacy
The more we understand it is what made us human
And it what allows us to flourish
Justin it's been such an honor to have you today
Where's the best place for people to learn more about
The work that you're doing in your book
Thank you so much to the intimate animals available
And bookstores
And anywhere you can order a book
And I invite folks if you read it I'd love to hear from you
I'm having fun learning what people enjoyed about it
Or didn't enjoy about it
And follow me on social media
It's at Dr. Justin Garcia
And folks can also follow the Kinsey Institute
Where we post a lot of our studies
Opportunities to be engaged
And I hope I get to hear from more folks
And most importantly thank you John
There's been so much fun being in conversation
And thinking about where our work
Combined could bring together
And help us better understand the best parts of being human
Awesome
Justin's such a great time today
Thank you again
Thank you
That brings us to the end of today's conversation
With Dr. Justin Garcia
What stood out most to me is how deeply human connection really is
Our need to bond, to touch, to feel known and valued
Is not weakness, it's a design
Justin's work reminds us that intimacy is not something we earn after success
It's something that sustains us through life itself
And a culture that often prioritizes independence and productivity
This is a powerful reframe
Connection is not a distraction from achievement
It's one of the conditions that makes achievement meaningful
And it raises an important question
If we don't consciously build connection
What quietly takes its place?
That question leads directly into our next conversation
On Thursday I'll be joined by my friend Nier Eil
Behavioral expert and author of the New York Times best-selling book Beyond Belief
While today's episode explored intimacy and human bonding
Nier examines how our beliefs shape behavior, attention
And decision-making in a world engineered to capture our focus
It's a powerful continuation of the life beyond the script
Moving from connection to cognition
From relationships to the internal narratives that guide our lives
Another study that blew my mind was a study that conducted at Yale
Where they found that people who had positive views about aging
Versus negative views on aging
Lived on average seven and a half years longer
Seven and a half years longer is a tremendous effect
That is longer than the effect of diet
It's longer than the effect of exercise
It's greater than the effect of quitting smoking on your lifespan
And for all the attention we talk about
vitamins and minerals and don't eat right and exercise and don't smoke
Who talks to you about your beliefs?
We almost never hear that
This episode resonated with you
Share it with someone who might need it
Leave a fire start rating a review on Apple Podcast or Spotify
Watch the full conversation on YouTube
And until next time remember
A meaningful life isn't built in isolation
It's built through the connections that remind us
We don't have to navigate the world alone
I'm John Miles and you've been PassionStruck
Passion Struck with John R. Miles



