Loading...
Loading...

Most of us are drowning in content but starving for actual facts. This week, Jared and Ian sit down with Kira Shishkin — 4-time entrepreneur, investor, and CEO of informed.now — to talk about why the news media stopped serving readers and started serving advertisers, how misinformation is manufactured at scale, and what a genuine "information diet" actually looks like.
Kira built TurboTax Full Service at Intuit, evaluated 600+ venture deals, and grew up across Ukraine, Israel, and the U.S. — giving him a front-row seat to information warfare in three different cultures. He's not just complaining about the problem; he built a solution: news by SMS, no accounts, no ads, no data collection, just facts from primary sources.
Whether you still watch cable news or you've checked out entirely, this one will make you rethink how you consume information.
Check out Kira's company: https://informed.now
📌 CHAPTERS
0:00 — Ian's overcooked intro
0:43 — Meet Kira Shishkin
1:46 — Why he left Intuit and TurboTax Full Service
2:51 — How informed.now works: news by SMS
4:15 — Sourcing only from primary sources
6:46 — How news became an advertising business
9:44 — Are people waking up to media manipulation?
12:09 — AI in journalism: useful tool or dangerous shortcut?
21:46 — The coming era of information overload
25:54 — What a healthy information diet actually looks like
28:51 — Growing up in Ukraine, Israel, and the U.S.
33:42 — SMS, anonymity, and radical privacy
36:16 — Will the world be more or less informed in 10 years?
38:19 — Evaluating 600+ venture deals — does informed.now pass its own test?
41:42 — Are we living in truly unique times?
43:21 — Is America's division real, or manufactured by media?
45:26 — Jared's 5 rapid-fire questions
51:02 — Outro
🎙️ CONNECT WITH US
CommonX Podcast | Two Gen X dads talking to people actually doing things in the real world.
#CommonXPodcast #MediaLiteracy #Misinformation #InformationOverload #GenX #NewsMedia #informed #KiraShishkin #FactsNotOpinions #MediaBias
The CommonX Podcast features long-form conversations with musicians, cultural voices, veterans, entrepreneurs, and independent thinkers who bring lived experience to the table. Hosted by Jared Mayzak and Ian Primmer, CommonX explores music, culture, work, identity, resilience, and the systems that shape everyday life—without talking points or manufactured outrage.
From iconic artists and creative pioneers to everyday people with extraordinary stories, each episode prioritizes honesty, curiosity, and meaningful dialogue. This is a Gen-X–driven show for listeners who value depth over noise and conversation over clicks.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
I'm the great Irish guy old stories hit high tells a struggle in strife keep your head in the fight broken bones in the street
Ain't no place for the weeks from the land of the brave where the words cut deep coming next on the end
Now feel the despair generation next shout out
Stand in somewhere rising up from the dark with the fire and spark range and passion combine to leave a lasting more
Coming next shouting loud voices from the crowd through the mister
If you're tired of being told what to think and you'd rather actually think
Welcome to the 1% hit like or subscribe we don't do echo chambers
We are common ex common ex hey man supposed to be at the same time
We are common exo man hit like and subscribe hit like and subscribe
You guys are out there watching videos, but not liking and subscribing come on
YouTube's were subscribers that man. That's where you got to be hit subscribe and now we're here for the portion of the show
I like to call Ian's overcooked intro
Ian take it away. All right. Welcome back to the comics podcast where two genics dad sit down with interesting people
Who are actually doing things in the real world not just yelling about them on the internet quick shout out to everyone
Tune it in from Bigfoot country and beyond and yes Jared's not hiding. He is Bigfoot
So we appreciate every like every subscribe every comment you guys have helped this little podcast grow
And it's something pretty special. We don't take that lightly now today's guest is a really interesting one
Because this conversation sits right in the middle of something we talk about on this show all the time
Information narratives and how the heck normal people are supposed to make sense of the world anymore our guest today is Kira
Shishkin a four time entrepreneur investor and the founder and CEO of a company called informed
Which is basically trying to solve the modern problem that all of us are feeling right now
We're drowning in information, but somehow still starving for clarity
Kira welcome to the show man
Well Ian Jared, thank you so much for having me
Yeah, thanks for coming up
Absolutely, man
Now Kira before we even get into the company I have to ask when you speak four languages
Does that mean you also get four different versions of the news depending on which language you're reading it in?
You don't need to go as far as different languages to get four different versions of the news
That's true, good point
All right, so you built a nine-figure marketplace into it which is no small feat man
So what made you step away from that world and decide the next problem worth solving was how humans consume information
Yeah, that was a really exciting
That was a really exciting chapter in my career being able to build something
Is an incubation within a larger enterprise environment that has so many resources and so much
You know just so much potential to go from zero to one very very quickly even zero to 100 very quickly
And that was a really exciting experience
The marketplace that we built as now known as TurboTax full service which is a huge business for into it
And we did in a very small lean team
I've stepped away from that because the urgency of the problem that we're solving now has continued to accelerate, get amplified and just keep going back in front of my face
Wow, I really want to do something about what I call misinformation overload
What? There's misinformation out there? No way
Yeah, it was wild for every once and everything else, yeah
Yeah, that's pretty crazy
So how's it work man?
Yeah, how's that work?
Yeah, it's designed with the utmost simplicity in mind
To achieve the effect of the scale that we need in order to change the way facts are consumed the way news are read by the everyday person
It needs to be really really simple and it needs to be really really minimalist
So in the form. Now, which is the name of the project is the is the leading news by SMS service in North America
What that means is you get your news by text by SMS
If you're in any of the states of the it states or if you're in Canada each as simple as texting our toll free number
You don't have to text at once and it's toll free so you never charged for for texting us
Or go to our website which is informed on now where you know through a very brief sign-up process it takes about three to five seconds
You enroll kind of in our program which is facts by SMS I shouldn't even call it the news by SMS it's facts by SMS
So how do you curate your facts like where are you getting that information from because like Kino we said earlier like polarization is on every news platform
So how do you guys ensure that what you're sending out to people is just the facts
Yeah, it's it's such an obvious answer and yeah, it's a forgotten art in in journalism and the reporting industry in just the media
Englomerance that we inherit
But we go to primary sources in fact 80% of our coverage
It pulls from primary sources meaning if someone said something you know we only have two options
We have one option is to actually listen to the horses mouth and we can we can talk to the horse itself
Or we can go to the barn and talk to a bunch of pigs who talk to the birds and they talk to the dog and the dog heard from a horse
And we can get our news that way and so to us the option was very obvious and yet as we navigated or observed the landscape of media
Everybody was in the barn mixing with the rest of the animals and so we thought why don't we just go to the horse and and get the information as clearly as we can
We never assert things to be true so unlike other news that you read right they claim hey Trump is the worst person Trump is the best person
Hey Epstein Epstein Epstein there's all this noise where they suggested commentary kind of like a talk line as to how you should feel about it
We don't assert anything we attribute information to sources where we would we get them
And so for example we would say here the White House claims these are the goals of the epic fury operation in Iran
Right so you know the CDC claims that these numbers are down of a certain disease
But we're never asserting things we are attributing kind of inside to where we got it from
And we are really really specialized in getting to the primary sources and surfacing that level of clarity to our user
We go through all the government agencies all the governments of the world central banks
You know large research foundations that have credibility to to publish the one they publish
We go through you know Supreme Court cases bills of Congress very original documents that give us the closest we can get to the base facts
Wow incredible man and ladies and gentlemen if you didn't pick it up cure is a 2018 public speaking champion
What an excellent answer there man
What an incredible design I mean the way you just put that together I think that's something people can really resonate with
You know I mean most people feel overwhelmed by the news right now right every platform is screaming for attention from your perspective
Is this an accident of technology or is it actually the system working exactly the way it was designed?
I love that question and I think the systems design changed substantially over time and it has betrayed the user in the process
Right and you gentlemen can obviously relate to this but during the 2004 era when everybody could get online
And a published distribute information there was a proliferation of kind of like blog level content
There came a point where the user the reader said hey there's there's I want to pay for news there's so much free stuff out there
That was a very dangerous decision made at scale because people stopped paying for news
And when people stopped paying for news the news the newsrooms the companies that well how are we going to support our work which is important and expensive
And suddenly they hear knock on the door and they open the door and it's the advertisers the whole barn of them
Right and they say hey news is going to be free don't worry about charging the users the readers we're going to pay for everything
Just save us a little bit of real estate on the left side and a little bit on the right side so that we can advertise to your user
So it's free for them but you know we get their data we value the privacy and we sell sell sell as much as we can
So initially it was like it's an interesting work in the road and and eventually the whole industry said that's the only way we can survive
By so much so that by like early 2010s mid 2010s every single company that does news media has transitioned into an advertising company
Whether they sell the real estate to another ad engine like Google or anything of a sort or they run their own ad engine
They stop being facts companies they stop being reporting companies they started being advertisement companies with news as the bait
And so we find ourselves early 2020s in a moment where the incentives of the industry of a news are contradictory to the incentives of us as readers
In fact they're antagonistic in a way what does that mean their goal is to hijack attention
And to hold it hostage for as long as possible because that's how they make money that's how they survive that's how they operate the business
Which obviously results in clickbait rage bait sensationalism verbosity adds that are invasive that are everywhere
It results in by sort of a separate issue but it goes hand in hand and that level of noise is not what the reader ever wanted
The reader wanted to get informed and get out and we're bringing that back on the table
And I find that incredible man because we talk a lot on the show like you just said about manufactured narratives right
Not necessarily conspiracies just the reality that every institution frames reality in its own way right
Do you think people are waking up to that or are we still like mostly stuck inside our algorithmic bubbles
I think I think people waking up to it for sure perhaps slower than then I would like to see it
But the statistics completely show it you know the proof is in the data
And the data is showing that the news readership especially across generations like a gen X may still read news although I don't know too many that do
And you know go to millennials you go to Gen Z there's less and less readership there is less there's higher and higher BS filters as you get all younger
And there is just no interest in considering legacy news such that the legacy news industry is just unable at this point to attract new readers
Which is a death sentence and is not sustainable because ultimately you know over a longer period of time what the user wants is always going to win
It's not what the industry wants and so we see it in the statistics already we see that folks don't read the news folks don't trust the news
It's only matter a few more years of this continuing where people completely stop completely resign and the industry is going to have to either evolve itself substantially or be evolved forcefully by players like us who are not going to take noise or an answer
Yeah I think we kind of saw that with newspapers too right like I'm old enough to remember that that's how most people consume their news was the daily newspaper that they got
And that kind of went away when digital came along and I think kind of platforms like yours or maybe the next evolution and how people get their news
And you know I'll scroll through my news feeds now and if I click on something one it's either paid walled so I can't read the article which is freaking annoying
Or it says generated by AI and AI can make mistakes right so how do you think about like the rule of AI and news curation versus human editorial judgment where it is informed not now land on that
Totally we have we have very strong stances we were born in Silicon Valley we I was in technology my my kind of whole career
And we have a very clear eye view of what AI is good at and what AI is bad at and also where we are in the kind of state of the eye
We are really in the early stages where so many of the use cases that we fantasize about are still out of reach
And if you're able to be quite realistic about that then I think you can get ahead
But if you were kind of how the the every person is which is either AI is going to save the world is going to you know ruin the world
That level of like extremist fluctuation is not really helpful there are right jobs for AI today which are primarily in analysis
There are a lot of wrong jobs that he just isn't capable of the eyes until today is not capable of reasoning
Not capable of awareness that we require real large training and memory windows that is it doesn't have and it doesn't have empathy
You know it also doesn't really think outside of the box because all that it does is guess the best next word to come in a sequence
So it's it's aimed for predictability and news isn't always predictable and even if it was I'm not trusting a machine that cannot reason with facts
And so with informed about that we are very technologically enabled we're very AI enabled but ultimately everything that comes out of our ecosystem is is human supervised
And there is no other way around it because we take responsibility for our content right we are not some AI slop app that is use at your own risk
That's we're going to lead that to perplexity right if you want to get news from perplexity you say perplexity give me news don't make a mistake
And it's going to give you things that you're going to need to double check triple check when you get content from informed up now and you get your news from us
We put our whole reputation on the line every single day and if we get it wrong we deserve to lose you as a customer
Yeah like that standpoint
Yeah definitely man
Now Kira you went through a serious accident man left you dealing with disability for years I mean
On what's like that tend to change how you prioritize life right I mean did that experience shape the way you think about time attention and information?
Yeah I'm glad you bring that up because you know it makes this whole story a lot more personal for me and there was a time in my life and I was a young lad
When I couldn't wield my attention as a result of the accident that I was I would take them off and I couldn't wield my attention like I couldn't focus I couldn't learn I couldn't remember things
I also had a huge kind of memory loss pain on my life up to that point and and that was the biggest loss I could ever imagine right like I would have given up a limb just to have my brain
Our back and it was very difficult I think you know the years of uncertainty the years of
It's like ambiguity in terms of like am I going to be able to remember things again am I going to be able to learn again am I going to be able to focus again
And the length of time in that last that was was very very difficult and it's sort of in my mind in my heart painted this image of this like disoriented state
I would never want to relive I would never want people I care about which is everyone I care about I care about you guys care about everybody I don't want anyone to relive that experience or experience that in the first place
And when I come to native states it's about a decade ago now and I see that America is artificially creating that state for its citizens and for people around the world
And I'm like no no no no no no there there has to be a better way and I'm not saying we're going to suggest I'm not suggesting that we're going to save everybody right everyone has their own cup of tea
But we want to build a viable strong alternative for the people that do not wonder attention jeopardized and disoriented we want to give them the tools to make up their own mind
Do you know that's amazing and now Nelloki you're basically building the anti doom scrolling machine dude if you succeed half of X is going to lose its entire business model man I just want that
You know if something is someone listening right now wants to reclaim their attention and stop feeling like they're drowning in news what's one habit they could start tomorrow cure
I think we don't give enough credit to the attention audit exercise and I'm not actually sure if I invented this I probably didn't I probably just named it
But everyone's in a while the month can do the quarter just do an attention audit of like water all the places in my day in my week
Where my attention is being demand or being somehow used that can be conversations relationships can be media that you consume
And just like do a little audit of like where where am I being pulled to focus on and once you write it out because the experience of writing out things
It forces a different layer of thinking you can't do it in your head the fidelity of thought in our head when it just verbalize in our head is very very low it needs to be expressed in writing or be better in a conversation with a friend
Then you really suggest new thoughts to a much more rigorous inquiry
Do you have attention audit once in a while to it now take five minutes to do it and see are all these places where my attention is being
That hostage or being hijacked is that what I want to happen and if news is is
Art of that audit of yours think about think about informed on now and the mission of you know putting the power of facts back in your palm
Yeah, I really love that idea of attention audit like I see so many zombies out there just doom scrolling constantly for hours
Like I've seen people do for hours and I'm just like hello like hello come back to earth
We've all done it too like we've all been there we've all been those people I feel like just a few just last week
I called myself in a moment where I was doing scrolling for hours and it's like is another person I want to be this is not how I want to be influenced
How do I get rid of this?
Yeah, that famous rabbit hole man
Yeah, my my TikTok algorithms figured out I love funny cat videos that are AI generated
They make me laugh man I found one the other day it made me laugh so hard almost fell over so it's pretty fun
I mean there's some fun things out there but yeah, I like that idea of the attention audit that's totally cool
And it's interesting to to hear you speak here because I've had people flagged us down before and they said hey man
I love listening to your show in the morning on the way to work, right?
That means the those legacy outlets like you were talking about man people are ditching them dude they're coming to Jared and I now in our podcast
Listening to us on the way to work and on the way home from work and it's like they can get away from that news noise pollution
You know like this whole bipartisan politics and everything I've heard you talk about media minimalism man
That's it's interesting because our culture is built on more content more updates more notifications
Right do you think the future might actually swing the other direction toward people intentionally consuming less?
Yeah, I think the move towards purposefulness is inevitable
I think it's going to get worse before it gets better
I think with the emergence of AI or the adoption of the eye within the media industry is going to create so much noise before it ever gets cleaned up
So much so that you know it's it's the number one use case or a large language model is to regurgitate words
And it's getting better and better at doing it doesn't mean it can handle facts doesn't mean it can reason
We don't have technology that can reason as of today nowhere in the industry do we have AI that's artificial reasoning
We only have artificial word clouds and really sophisticated word regurgitation
But text itself right in the media generally but text itself is the number one kind of domain for AI to be applied to and it's already being applied
Right you're just already being fed all these AI videos in his feed but I think in the next couple of years and it might be sooner
Right we're going to arrive at a place where the channels are so flooded with AI content that is indistinguishable from any other content
Because it's getting better and better all the time such that it's paralyzing I mean people already feel quite paralyzed before AI was even around the corner
You know people were already quite paralyzed by by news and media now with AI becoming such a strong stronghold of it
It's going to be even harder and my kind of near term medium term thesis is that it's in a couple of years
It's going to be possible to consume news without your own filter that your own shield that your own kind of quality control of papers
This is a sea of noise I'm only going to let in things that care about and things that I feel like and trust and that filter is going to be a must
Because collecting or consuming information is going to be a defensive act I mean it already is in many ways
I think it's going to become a defensive act and so we're getting way ahead of that situation
But the trend towards that is only creating adding more urgency to our mission of creating a high fidelity channel
I signal channel that doesn't involve noise and its whole purpose is to serve the reader instead of serving an exterior motive of the advertiser or sponsor or a type platform
Yeah I mean it's crazy how fast it's evolving too like you know I used AI tools a lot I used Claude the other day to create an application
But I kind of know Python right but I just told it here's what I want and about 15 minutes later I saw it build all the code and give me a link
And I did some command line stuff and there's an app like that's insane
So like those are the kind of things that I think AI is really good at
Like coding tools like that and we see like leaps and bounds of words just getting better and better
Like one of the big tests for AI for me especially AI videos like oh I can tell it's AI generated because the guys playing the guitar and his fingers aren't actually plucking the strings
But I saw one what two days ago and dude it was hard to tell that it wasn't AI
Like other than the fact that it was you know a bunch of characters from Harry Potter you know all in a rock band
But like I paid really specific attention on like facial movements and how their hands interact with the instruments that they're playing and it has gotten scary good
So I think there needs to be you know I think Google talked about this is that with their app the VO31 they talked about putting like watermarks
And their AI generated stuff so people could tell that it's AI generated
Do you think like something like that an adoption wise needs to be like industry wide and that would help prevent a lot of this AI slop that we're seeing?
So yes and no right if you know that on its own like Sora is famous for having the watermarks
Sora by opening AI you know video generation tool I was one of like the first ones to go viral for creating these silly videos
Probably most of the cats you saw back in a day were from Sora they had the word marks I believe they still have the watermarks
Unfortunately for people who really want to trick who really want to kind of you know misrepresent that's not going to stop them
And that's not a strong enough structurally there's not a strong enough guardrail
I also think it complicates a little bit when you wrote the essay you wrote the code and then you put it into cloth to verify the confirm it to double check it to give you a second opinion
And now it has the watermark and it's like well should it have the watermark or is it mostly Jared's app with a little bit of help from just the tool
Right you get to use the tools you need it's nothing wrong with using tools
The bigger question that I'm asking is how do we get the watermark in the news industry because there it would be really nice
To say Sora this story was fully hallucinated by you know insert insert your favorite or your least favorite publisher
Yeah where's my news PS detector yeah people talk about food diets all the time right but almost nobody talks about their information diet man
So what does a healthy information diet actually look like I agree with the watermark man
I love that you bring the diet sort of analogy because you wouldn't in your right mind say that eating more is going to make you healthier
But we have we've inherited this framework that to be more informed you have to read and consume more information
No you don't know you don't it's just that you've been eating sort of high calorie low nutrition food
And you're kind of forced to keep eating it because it's not nutritious but wait a second
You're consuming more and more calories but you aren't actually getting the nutrition you're becoming intellectually cognitively information obese perhaps in the process
And then things get harder everything it's harder now you're hooked on this food now you can't eat anything else but this food
And we're creatures of habit and the creatures of patterns
And so information diets in the era of information obesity could not be a more pertinent topic
You know it's about what information you consume what information you let in through your filter that is going to want to make a difference
And before even you know judging it thematically or judging it based on any other kind of features of the information
Just ask yourself you know does this information that I'm letting in does it have an agenda
And if it has an agenda it's already in a different category of like oh I need to be careful
Oh I'm probably need to read this twice and then I have to read the left side then I'm going to have to read the right side
Then I'm going to have to read the upside and then I'm going to read the downside
Then I'm going to talk to a couple of friends and see what they read to triangulate what is actually happening
And at this point you've eaten so much content
It's your stomach is hurting your brain is hurting
And we believe and this goes back to the news minimalist kind of approach
Is that it's not about reading everything it's not also about reading more it's about reading things that have no agenda
It's about simplifying and minimizing content input such that you're getting things that are nutritious
And that allow you to make up your own mind instead of forcing you to swing a certain way
Yeah and I hope the 50,000 listeners and viewers that tuned in last week I heard I really hope that they heard that
Because I know they're driving down the highway right now and they're getting ready to go home after work and they're going to watch Fox News
Or they're going to watch CNN and they're going to eat that high calorie fatty information diet man
And I think everybody should give it a shot man go to inform dot now get the facts get it get it lean
Get it cleaned up a little bit and everyone should check that diet absolutely
Now you grew up between different cultures right Ukraine Israel and the US do people in different countries see the world fundamentally differently
Or do we all basically worry about the same things
Yeah I mean what we focus on in our news research
I really like calling us a news research company rather than a news company because what we produce is research output
That's our scale sets that we bring
We prioritize significance and we think of significance as a universal
The way we define significance is scale of effect it can't be you know 300 people
And be 3000 people it's going to have to be millions for it to have that significance flag for us of like hey
This is about to change the world and that's the first question right is like how many people are being affected
We don't focus on local accidents we don't focus on you know unfortunate airplane crash in Swahili
We focused on large world changing phenomenon and how does it have to change the world in order to be significant
Well it has to change the lives of that many people
What does changing a life mean it means changing and safety changes in security changes in optionality in obviously in the wealth
Changes in options overall in in healthcare in culture in in social war and peace type of levels
That's the scale of significance that we focus on and we think of that as as being universal right
So if it's changing the option choice of millions of people this is significant
If it is a local you know very loud accident in Swahili it's it's not significant
There are better local new sources that will dramatize that event and it will serve it up to you
We are not going to we we focus on world changing stuff
Now I think part of your question and correctly if I'm wrong is also just reflections on Ukraine, Israel, United States
Which are all places of heated information warfare in Ukraine you know in Ukraine it was bipolar in any way
It was Ukraine and Russia for a pretty long time and it was pretty black and white
Ukraine was kind of doing its own thing Russia was in injecting propaganda into our system
Injecting content that was malicious and very much intentionally created to mislead and to confuse and to disorient
Now it's all bubble of the surface but before any of this happened before the war started in 2022
It started in 2014 and before the war started in 2014 there was a decade of misinformation leading up to it
So information conflict precedes actual conflict and it's been happening for a while which is really unfortunate
When I moved to Israel I saw the explosion of polarization across not two poles but many different poles
Poles I guess polarities there's multi polarity in Israel
There's so many perspectives within Israel itself outside of Israel with Israel's friends with Israel's enemies
It's at the whole Middle East is such a circus of you know folks competing for buy-in into their version of the truth
Which at this point there is no more version of any truth it's very hard to tell what's going on
And so I just got to witness an explosion of perspectives everyone buying for your buy-in
In the United States it was sort of back to a bipolarity it was back to bipartisanship but what exploded this time is the volume and the multiplicity of outlets
We don't have nowhere near as much media in Ukraine as we have in the United States
The United States is a content size of Europe, size of a continent worth of entertainment, information of social media that is constantly pulsating and living life of its own
And so polarity became a bit more bipolar again but it became so much louder, so much more confusing and so much more just explosive
Yeah we export a lot of that around the world too
So one of the things you're talking about like Russia right it's kind of state-sponsored media
And they tell their citizens what they want them to hear and I think China does that a little bit too
Do you see something like your app being on an SMS platform a way to bypass that narrative in control or not really?
Totally, I mean we have such a direct access to a reader and we honor that level of access every single day
We have such crazy systems in place to make sure that the privacy, the honoring of our reader's attention is something they've never experienced before
Now let's say the SMS channel for us, the format that we use is more about preserving attention than flying under the reader of a government
I mean we do that anyway but you can do that with email
You can do that with really many other independent sources or independent formats
Where we shine with SMS or like the reason we chose SMS is because it allows us to pioneer a level of anonymity
with our users that they have not seen before
There are no accounts, there are no passwords
There is no ability for us even technically to read open rates and we don't
There is such a level of non-monitoring and non-information like non-data collection
And there's a level of privacy that's immediate
On email you can press and subscribe and you can press it six more times, they'll still send you stuff
There's nothing you can really do with SMS as soon as you text the word stop
The legal, huge compliance cellular system completely forbids messaging and it's instant and it doesn't falter
A lot of our users are anonymous, we don't even know who they are
And we don't care because we don't want to under some sort of excuse pretend that we're going to collect information
To improve your experience on this website, there is no website, there is no improving your experience
We do this one thing, we do it well, we look for people who want it
We don't want any information from you
So the SMS channel is less about the government stuff because you can accomplish another channel that's more about honoring privacy
To the extent of anonymity for our users
Yeah, I think that's pretty cool
It allows you to not have to worry about being compliant on storing everybody's data
And these huge data breaches, I think that would be honestly like a relief for a lot of these companies
To be able to not have to worry about that
So that's awesome that you guys do it that way
All right, let's fast forward 10 years here, man
Do you think the world would be more informed or more confused than we are today?
Well, it's interesting, 10 years is like I think it goes through the value of shadows that I was saying earlier
I think within 10 years there should be in a brighter spot
I'm very optimistic despite reading news every day
Which is, you know, when you read news 24 hours
And so in the process of that, some people can get pretty pessimistic
But we can say, ah, this is a lot of bad stuff happening
At the opposite effect on me, right, completely opposite
I'm really excited, I'm really optimistic
And I think the world is going through contortions
But on the way to a really bright future
So I think 10 years is going to be a great decade
Right, I think it's going to get a little more confusing in the next few
It's going to be confusing by year five
Maybe even confusing by year six or seven
But by the end of, you know, year eight, nine, ten onwards
I think we're going to have a media ecosystem
That has more options for people
And it's going to have the option that we are pioneering
Which is minimalism, mindfulness around media
And purposefulness, right?
And I'm not suggesting we're going to, you know, there's not going to be any more Fox readers
Or CNN readers
They're never going the way
And that's part of human experience
But right now there is no alternative for that
And we just want to create that alternative such that
We're the people that want to read news without noise
Want to read news to make up their own minds
That I'm having their mind made up for them
We want to have a very strong alternative
Out there for people to use
And I think ten years from now that we're not going to be the only ones
Yeah, I think that's great
So I'm going to take it back to your venture a little bit
So you've evaluated over 600 venture companies and deals, right?
What do you look for in a company?
And does inform.Now pass your own tests?
It's a great question because what I'm always looking for when it's advising, investing, helping another venture
Another project, whatever it is
Is their understanding of the customer, right?
They need to be intimately aware of the customer's problems, their needs, their profile
They need to be able to describe who they serve in excruciating detail
Right, I need to be able to be like, hey, stop telling me about the color of their underwear
Like I don't care, that's too much detail
It needs to be granular, it needs to be really, really granular
And in some ways, we don't pass that check
Because unlike other more pointed solutions, we are sort of used by such a diversity of people
Ideologically, income level geographically around North America
Obviously, age, gender, other kind of affiliations, backgrounds, education, no education
There is such a diversity of the user that we serve
But for us, we are always on the goal of trying to figure out who is it that we serve, who is our target person that we want to serve
And at the same time, with the absence of data collection, we also feel good about
It makes that discovery very difficult
And so in some ways, right, we have archetypes, we have guesses, hypotheses
And a good amount of research that we do on top of our operations
But if I was an investor coming into the forum. Now, and I say, hey, you guys
Doesn't seem like you know who your user is
And that's in some ways true
Because we don't have such a specific product for such a specific person
We are used by the Gen X, we're used by the Gen Z
And there's not that much in common between those two categories
Or between those two groups, we're used by radical left and radical rate
And the people that would not even realize that the other person is drinking from the same source
And it's sort of like the donkey or the mule and the elephant or things the elephant
It comes in the same well, they come in the same well to drink the water
And I love that we've been able to build the well that all the barn animals and the mules and the elephants can drink from
But it's crazy, they don't even realize that we are building something that is so unpartisan
It is so non-biased in a way that anyone can drink from it
If you're just someone who's interested in the facts, someone who wants to be formed without being influenced
I like that generation outlook too that you mentioned in there
And so I mean every generation believes that they're living in the most chaotic of times, right?
Every generation does
Do you think our era is actually unique or is this just the latest version of human tribal storytelling, I guess?
Our era is definitely very unique in terms of archivabilities have changed
I am a technologist, if you ask me if I was religious, I'd say of course I'm religious, I'm a futurist, I'm a technologist
My belief, I'm also a capitalist that is definitely my religion
So on the note of like our living in unique times, we definitely are
Because from my kind of world view, personal to me, I think a lot of people shared a lot of people don't
Is human kind of advancement ecology
Everything else, policy, environment, social, everything is almost like a lagging,
Effect behind technological progress
Logical progress, first and foremost, advances the human race, right?
Whether that's the printing press, which is technology, or electricity, which is technology, or now AI, right?
Technology moves us all forward
And because that capability shift has happened and is currently happening, we're living in a very unprecedented time
Very, very unprecedented time where the technology we built, we don't fully understand
And the technology we built is more capable than the average us, significantly more capable
And so we're definitely living in a weird, weird, funky, exciting times
And that's also showing on our media
And I definitely, you know, the short answer to your question is, yeah, we're living through unique times
It's not a rerun
Do you think the most of the division in America is, do you think it's actually real, or are we just seeing the loudest 10% of people amplified by algorithms?
Most of the division, you said?
Yeah, yeah, do you think most of the division in America is actually real?
I think a lot of it, I would say the division, it's hard to say if it's real or not, because it is real now
If people experience it, then it's real, but it was artificially instigated
I think a very good chunk of the division that we see, which I would say is civil war level at this point
And we wouldn't call it that because we're living through it, where the frogs slowly boiling in a pot
But the history books might remember this time as a civil war
It is a cultural civil war that's for sure
And people are very angry, very frustrated, and it is not normal
You know, what's been happening recently is not something we should have grown numb to, I don't think
And so, I think a lot of the division that we've been seeing is, you know, called real or not
It's been to a great degree artificially insuminated, artificially instigated
And it's instigated by media that apart from the bias of one side is crazy, other side is crazy
Is thriving on sensationalism
I think the biggest sin of modern day legacy news media is not the bias
The bias is an age-old sin that everyone should be embarrassed by, but that isn't even the worst thing
The sensationalism with which information is disseminated
The sensational with which everything is a clickbait or ragebait
That to me is what's really driving the division and forcing a division where there isn't even necessarily one to be found
Yeah, I would agree
Alright, man, we've reached the portion of the show that I'd call Jared's Five
Jared's Five
Alright, this is where I get to ask you some fun questions
So, one is from our previous guest for you
Couple softball questions, couple kind of hard questions
And then you'll have a chance to give us a question for our next guest
Alright, so our last guest was Adam
Gosh, so his last name
Michael?
No
My cell
My cell
And his question for you is if you were president for a day, what's one thing that you would do to unite the people over?
Hmm
I think the...
The power of in-person connection is being rediscovered across the world right now
I think we've spent a couple of years during the pandemic coming out of the pandemic scared
Not hanging out, not seeing each other, not going to third places in our communities
And I think it's got to have to be something to do with enabling in-person experiences
Right?
Whether that's gifting a dinner to every family in, you know, in the United States
Such that, hey, this is like a small micrograd almost to put on a Thanksgiving-like dinner and in the country of neighbors
Right?
And, you know, we are we want to support people coming together
It's a very, you know, off the very quick answer,
and I'd probably think a little bit harder
on this if I was president,
but I would wanna do something that very tangibly
gives, you know, a small gesture of support,
but a tangible gesture of support of, hey,
bring other people to the dinner table,
bring your neighbors, bring your friends,
bring people you haven't connected with in a while,
bring them to the dinner table and just hang out in person.
Yeah, it's great.
All right, easy one.
What's your favorite movie of all time?
Lots of options to pick from.
One that comes to mind immediately
is a 1967 film, an art house film,
called Blower by Nicolangelo Antonioni,
which to me, it's a wonderful, wonderful time capsule
of a time I have not lived,
but the character in that movie
really sort of strikes a tone with me,
strikes a note with me, I love,
I love the character exposition
and I love the time capsuleing
that that film is able to deliver.
Now I have to check that out, I've got our development.
Well, I can see that you have a great taste in film
based on your posters and the thousand kind of.
He does.
Yeah, I've watched quite a few movies,
probably too many, but, you know, whatever.
All right, favorite cartoon growing up as a kid.
Tom and Jerry introduced me to jazz
and I think that's a really important thing
that Tom and Jerry's not given credit for.
The soundtrack of all the original Tom and Jerry films
contained the most enriching jazz tracks
that are really worth ingesting as a kid
and I just think that's something
that nobody gives Tom and Jerry credit for.
But they introduced me to jazz
which is now a really big part of my life.
That's cool.
It's a cool angle on it, too, I didn't think about.
All right, what's one thing that people don't know
about you that maybe they should?
Gosh, there's so many things, right?
One thing that keeps them eye on them,
I just get really passionate about is,
I'm a really passionate surfer.
I love surfing a lot and I really want to learn
how to kite surf.
I've never tried it in my surfing circles.
I'm a little bit embarrassed to admit it
because I feel at this point, I'm like,
do you have been trying it now?
You're not cool and I'm a very passionate surfer
in like a traditional board sense
and I'm really, really keen to try kite surfing
and this is a confession to all my surfing friends
that I haven't done it yet.
And if I'm not invited to the next
Angolo party, I apologize or I'll be a part of the tribe.
There's no time like the present to learn, though, man.
It's cool.
All right, if you can go back in time
and tell your teenage self one thing, what would it be?
I love saying this is my favorite thing.
I don't think I made this up,
but I definitely embody this.
It's everything, have the power to make you stronger
if you let it.
Yeah, that's a great one.
All right, you were questioned for our next guest.
Can be anything.
Yeah, gosh, I keep it simple.
You know, you're such a tough questioner.
So I want the next guest to have a really easy time.
My question for them is to just, you know, reflect on a hobby
that they had as a kid that has faded from their life.
And do they want to bring it by?
Oh, I can.
Yeah, that's a good one, man.
All right, Kira, this has been a fascinating conversation, man.
If people want to check out what you're building,
they can head over to inform.now.
And for everyone listening, if you've enjoyed this conversation,
make sure you like, subscribe and share that episode, man.
Because that's how independent shows like ours
keep these conversations going.
Kira Shishkin, everybody, thanks for joining us on CommonX.
If you're tired of being told what to think,
and you'd rather actually think,
welcome to the 1%.
Hit like or subscribe.
We don't do echo chambers.
We are CommonX.
CommonX.
Hey, man, it's supposed to be at the same time.
We are CommonX though, man.
Hit like and subscribe.
Hit like and subscribe.
You guys are out there watching videos,
but not liking and subscribing.
Come on, YouTube's where our subscribers are, man.
That's where you got to be.
Hit subscribe.
CommonX Podcast
