446 Resurrection Objection 3: Supernatural Inaccessible? (Aaron Shelenberger)

Have you heard of historiography? Your historiography is the method you employ in doing history. This is especially relevant when the scholars who make the rules for doing history decide to exclude any supernatural events from their historiography. Today, my guest, Aaron Shelenberger, continues his rebuttal to Ehrman’s three main objections to the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus. We discuss Ehrman’s contentions that supernatural events are inaccessible to historians and the prevalence of methodological naturalism. Also, Shelenberger briefly reviews the recent debate between Mike Licona and Bart Ehrman.

Listen to this episode on Spotify or Apple Podcasts

—— Links ——

• For Shelenberger’s thesis, see part 1: 444 Resurrection Objection 1: Unreliable Gospels?
• See also part 2: 445 Resurrection Objection 2: Improbable Miracles?
• Follow Aaron Shelenberger on his YouTube channel: Life and Beyond and on his blog: Abandoning the Trinity
• See Mike Licona’s Why Are There Differences Between the Gospels?
• Check out Shelenberger’s interview on the Trinities podcast (part 2 here)
• Other episodes referenced include 390 God Is Real (Why Christianity 3), 53 Does God Exist?, 54 Four More Reasons God Exists
• Support Restitutio by donating here
• Designate Restitutio as your charity of choice for Amazon purchases
• Join our Restitutio Facebook Group and follow us on Twitter @RestitutioSF
• Leave a voice message via SpeakPipe with questions or comments and we may play them out on the air
• Intro music: Good Vibes by MBB Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Free Download / Stream: Music promoted by Audio Library.
• Who is Sean Finnegan?  Read his bio here.