About this episode
Amber and Ryan delve into the complexities of logical fallacies, exploring how they manifest in everyday arguments, particularly on social media.
They discuss various types including false dichotomies, conjunction fallacies, and straw man arguments, emphasizing the emotional attachments that often accompany these reasoning errors.
The conversation highlights the importance of critical thinking and awareness in navigating discussions and the impact of social media on our reasoning processes.
---
Keep up with the plans: Be the first to get updates and news: secondplana.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@SecondPlanA Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/secondplana Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/second-plan-a Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/second-plan-a/id1763947418 Twitter: https://x.com/2ndplana
Get every episode summarized
Each time Second Plan A publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Second Plan A
59. Credentialed vs Capable: The Gap Between Rank and Readiness
Second Plan A
58. Behind the Women's Ultimate Self-Defense Championship: What Real Violence Ac...
Second Plan A
57. Useful Before True: Explanations That Don't Suck
Second Plan A
56. The Can Opener Test: Stuck vs Stable
Second Plan A