Donald Trump and the Epstein Estate: The Jane Doe 4 Payment Questions (3/24/26)

President Barack Obama.

Virginia, we are counting on you.

Republicans want to steal enough seats in Congress

to raid the next election and wield unchecked power

for two more years.

But you can stop them by voting yes by April 21st.

Help put our elections back on a level playing field

and let voters decide not politicians.

Vote yes by April 21st.

Paid for by Virginians for fair elections.

You're having a good time.

You're out drinking with the boys.

Now it's time to pay the tab.

$11,352.47 weight what?

Well, there are court costs, attorney fees,

higher insurance costs, damage to your car, do you why fines?

Ugh.

Not to mention the damage to your social life.

Plan a sober ride or pay the price.

Drinking and driving costs more than your drinks.

It could cost a life.

Learn more at what'sthedamage.org.

Brought to you by Virginia DMV.

President Barack Obama.

Virginia, we are counting on you.

Republicans want to steal enough seats in Congress

to raid the next election and wield unchecked power

for two more years.

But you can stop them by voting yes by April 21st.

Help put our elections back on a level playing field

and let voters decide not politicians.

Vote yes by April 21st.

Paid for by Virginians for fair elections.

What's up everyone and welcome to another episode

of the Epstein Chronicles.

Now that Darren Indyke and Richard Khan

have both testified in front of Congress,

there's still a lot of questions that need to be answered.

Especially concerning the settlement

that was allegedly paid out to Jane Doe No. 4.

Now Jane Doe No. 4 is also the Jane Doe

that made some serious allegations against Donald Trump.

So figuring out if this payment was paid out

is pretty important, right?

It goes to the accuracy of what Jane Doe 4 is saying.

And if she was found credible enough to receive a settlement,

then I would think that what she asked to say about Epstein

and those around them deserves a harder look.

And it deserves a robust investigation.

And as we know, that never occurred.

In fact, according to Darren Indyke,

nobody ever even spoke to him about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.

Just like nobody ever spoke to less Wexner

or anybody else on the inside of Jeffrey Epstein's

criminal empire.

And that's all by design.

The whole idea was to keep this scope narrow

and stay in the kitty pool.

They never wanted anybody to explore the deep end

because they know the deep end is where all the secrets

are buried.

So today, we have an article from News Nation and the headline,

questions around Epstein co-executers potential payment

to Jane Doe No. 4.

This article was authored by Diana Falzoni.

Both the Jeffrey Epstein's co-executers

have testified before a congressional committee

about their ties to the deceased sex offender

and both depositions ended with questions surrounding

a potential settlement with an accuser

known only as Jane Doe No. 4.

And look, again, I'm not saying that it happened.

I don't know.

But what I do know for sure is there

was no real investigation.

And if it was your daughter or your mother

or your sister or your friend,

I know you'd want an investigation at the very least, right?

And then where it goes from there, that's up to the evidence.

But the fact that none of this was ever really

investigated from the beginning,

that should be setting off more sirens than an air strike

and televieve.

I truly have no idea how somebody could look at this

and not be concerned.

Epstein's former attorney and co-executor,

Darren Indyke, testified before the House

Oversight Committee on Thursday.

His former accountant, fellow co-executor, Richard Khan,

testified last week.

And I still haven't seen the transcripts,

so we don't know exactly what was said word for word.

All we have is a summary of what went down.

But just from the summary alone, I'm not exactly impressed

by what we're hearing.

Indyke's name appears multiple times in the DOJ Epstein

files, mainly dealing with legal matters,

appearing in those files does not indicate guilt of a crime.

In his deposition before the committee,

Indyke would not confirm or deny a settlement with Jane

04, who accused Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein

of abuse when she was a minor.

However, he confirmed the existence of hard drives held

by Epstein's private investigators,

representative Robert Garcia, said in a statement,

why would the private investigators have

those hard drives and not the police?

It's unbelievable.

And it all just leads right back to the truth of the matter.

That Jeffrey Epstein was being protected

and he wasn't investigated in the matter that he should have been.

And look, something that happened recently

that you can look at as reference is what went down with Diddy

and look at the difference.

Perp walked him, got their photo op,

rated all of his properties, didn't let any of the properties

sit, and then, not only that,

tried to smack his ass with Rico.

So if you take a look at what Diddy was up to

and then you take a look at what Epstein was up to,

how can you tell me in good faith

that Diddy deserved Rico, but not Jeffrey Epstein?

I'm sorry, but I just don't buy it.

And anybody trying to pitch that either has no idea

what they're talking about or they have a much more

nefarious purpose for pitching that kind of narrative.

I mean, they took every single one of Diddy's digital devices,

phones, computers, tablets, all of it.

But these hard drives walk away and it's no big deal.

Nobody tracks them down.

Nobody assures that they're not going to walk away in the first place.

Nobody secures evidence.

I know, I know just another coincidence, right?

Garcia did not provide more about what was potentially

on those hard drives in the statement.

News Nation reached out to the individual members of the committee

on both sides of the aisle about Jane Doe 4

and each time was referred to committee press releases.

Well, that's interesting.

Since when does the committee want to run their fat yet?

All they do is talk, no action,

but all of a sudden they have nothing to say.

I wonder why?

Where's Anna Paulina Luna?

Oh, maybe she's busy with the interdimensional beings.

She's way too busy to figure out if a payout was made

by a woman that's accusing the sitting president.

Nothing to see here, folks, just a gigantic hoax.

Hey, you hear about Carg Island?

Khan Epstein's former accountant was

deposed by the oversight committee on March 11th

and some members are demanding clarity on whether or not

Khan paid a settlement to an accuser

referred to Jane Doe 4, citing Khan's inconsistent

and shifting statements as extremely concerning.

Well, look, we all knew that Khan wasn't going to be honest.

Him and Indyke, they have way too much to lose.

So if you thought that these two dudes were going to tell the truth

and blow the doors off this thing,

you were sorely mistaken, just like Lane Maxwell

and everybody else who has something to lose.

If you want to get to the truth of this,

you have to listen to the people who were abused

and you have to listen to the whistleblowers.

But they refuse to do it.

They just keep spinning their wheels and neutral.

Like, look, getting toven a well in there,

that's a good idea.

But what about Michael Thomas?

What about the lieutenants?

What about the people that made the decisions

to not have Jeffrey Epstein with another celly?

There's a lot going on, right?

And with all this ground to cover,

do you feel like this congressional committee

is covering enough of that ground?

I don't think so.

And I think the whole entire thing

is being driven by politics on both sides.

And that's a losing strategy at the end of the day

because both sides are just going to retreat into their bunkers

and start blaming the other team.

And while that's happening,

all of Jeffrey Epstein's buddies,

well, they're popping that bubbly

and laughing at all of us collectively.

The March 13th letter from Representative Garcia

and Rokana to Khan's attorney, Daniel S. Rosuma,

Redden Part.

On March 11th, 2026, your client, Mr. Khan,

testified in response to a question

by Representative Rokana that Jane Doe IV,

who Representative Khanow represented as a woman

who made allegations against President Trump

had received a settlement from the Epstein estate.

On March 12th, 2026, you represented

to oversight Democratic staff attorneys

that you could no longer stand by your assertion

that no settlement was reached with Jane Doe IV.

Instead, you stated on this second call

that you can neither confirm nor deny

whether a settlement was reached with Jane Doe IV.

Like, bro, come on.

If there was a settlement, there has to be paperwork, right?

Somebody paid the money, somebody transferred it,

somebody signed off on it, so where's the paperwork?

And if there isn't any, and there was no settlement,

or it was a backdoor handshake kind of deal,

that's a whole other problem.

They concluded a demand for Khan to confirm and writing

whether Jane Doe IV filed a claim against the Epstein estate

and if she received a monetary settlement from the estate.

News Nation asked Rosuma if his client

could confirm or deny Jane Doe IV was paid

from an Epstein account.

Rosuma replied, we have no comment.

Oh, I bet you don't.

I bet you don't.

So I'm gonna take that as yes.

And I have a sneaking suspicion

that this settlement was paid out.

Now does that mean everybody's guilty

and everybody did what was alleged?

Well, we know that it's not a guilty verdict,

but it doesn't look good.

And I know that I speak for most men out there.

If you're going to accuse me of something like that,

and it's not true, yo, I'm going down swinging.

I'm not going to have any kind of settlement whatsoever,

especially if I have the money to fight the allegation.

But all of a sudden these people are so quick

to pay out these settlements, right?

I wonder why.

President Barack Obama.

Virginia, we are counting on you.

Republicans want to steal enough seats in Congress

to raid the next election and wield unchecked power

for two more years.

But you can stop them by voting yes by April 21st.

Help put our elections back on a level playing field

and let voters decide not politicians.

Vote yes by April 21st.

Paid for by Virginians for fair elections.

Hi, this is Alex Cantrowitz.

I'm the host of Big Technology podcast,

a longtime reporter and an on-air contributor to CNBC.

And if you're like me, you're trying to figure out

how artificial intelligence is changing

the business world and our lives.

So each week on Big Technology,

I bring on key actors from companies building AI tech

and outsiders trying to influence it.

Asking where this is all going,

they come from places like Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon,

and plenty more.

So if you want to be smart with your wallet,

your career choices, and meetings with your colleagues

and at dinner parties, listen to Big Technology podcast

wherever you get your podcasts.

Hey, I'm Josh Spiegel, host of the podcast,

Lunatic in the newsroom.

If you enjoy journalism that drifts into mild panic,

wild overthinking and a guaranteed nervous breakdown,

Lunatic in the newsroom is for you.

It's news like you've never heard before.

The only newsroom with a panic button, you'll laugh,

you'll cry and gasp and horror

as the show spirals completely out of control.

It's not just news, it's emotionally unstable.

Lunatic in the newsroom, listen today.

Regarding the questions the White House official

told news nation last week, the White House,

would have no visibility into anything

and nothing to do with decisions allegedly made

by other entities.

Also would point you to these remarks from Comer

and post from oversight.

Epstein's accountant is now the fifth witness

to tell the committee that President Trump was not involved.

God, these people are so pathetic.

That's what this whole committee is about.

This whole committee is a gigantic BJ for President Trump.

I hate to be so crass, but that's what it is.

You know, he pulled Comer aside and was like,

listen here, Jimmy boy, go out there and make sure

that I come out of this looking good.

And that's why he hates Thomas Massey so much by the way

because Massey wasn't having it

and he knew that this was gonna be

nothing more than political theater.

So we got involved with the discharge petition

and now Comer and the GOP officials

that are sitting on this committee are being exposed.

And frankly, at this point, it seems like the only ones

who care are Thomas Massey and Nancy Mace,

but the rest of them, they can't be bothered

to try and find the truth.

All they can do is try and protect the president

and the administration.

A source familiar with Indyke's deposition told NewsNation

that Indyke said he was never contacted

or interviewed by law enforcement regarding Epstein

or Glaine Maxwell, the deceased financier

as co-conspirator who is serving 20 year federal prison

sentence for the sex trafficking of minor females.

Never even spoke with Indyke.

How can this be a real investigation if that never occurred?

How can anyone sit here and tell me

that this was fully investigated?

Everybody was looked at, every angle was checked.

If guys like Darren Indyke weren't even questioned.

Save the bullshit, save the nonsense

and miss me with all of it.

Indyke and Khan were listed as beneficiaries

in a January 9th, 2017 email,

about one of Epstein's financial trusts

referred to as the butterfly trust.

Indyke reportedly began to work for Epstein around 1996,

had no idea, never saw anything in all those decades.

Imagine believing that bullshit?

Khan and Indyke reached a $35 million settlement

on behalf of the sex traffickers estate

in a victim-class action suit.

Their attorney, Daniel H. Weiner,

perfect name formed by the way,

said in a statement in February

that the settlement is not an admission of guilt.

No, of course not.

We're just paying out $35 million

because you know, it's fun.

Because they did nothing wrong,

the co-executors were prepared to fight the claims

against them through to trial,

but agreed to mediate and settle this lawsuit

in order to achieve finality,

as to any potential claims against the Epstein's state.

Weiner said, yeah, so they can get their money.

Remember, they're the executors.

They're the ones that are on the line

to get whatever money's left over.

So yeah, they're gonna fight tooth and nail.

Indyke's lawyer Weiner provided his client's opening statement,

via email to News Nation on Thursday,

to the House Committee and stated,

he had no knowledge whatsoever

of Jeffrey Epstein's wrongdoings.

In his statements, Indyke said that as the co-executor,

he helped create the Epstein victim compensation program

to provide a voluntary and non-confrontational means

to compensate women who suffered sexual abuse

by Mr. Epstein.

Yeah, right.

You wanted a streamlined process

that was not going to break the bank.

So that's why you did what you did.

And I think that whole entire settlement fund

turned out to be a gigantic slap in the face

to a lot of the survivors.

Due to the court ordered confidentiality restrictions,

the court approved protocol for the Epstein victim,

compensation program,

and agreements with individual claimants,

the Epstein estate is prohibited

from providing that information.

However, any claimant who receives an award

under the estate funded EVCP or indirect settlement

with the estate is free to publicly share that information.

Weiner told News Nation,

Jess Michaels, the survivor of sexual assault

by Jeffrey Epstein in 1991,

told News Nation the fund has a strict legal process

where victims had to present evidence

and go through an interview process

with a claims administrator who was also an attorney.

Evidence included affidavits, medical records,

therapy notes, the victims who were paid

from the settlement fund had been determined

to have truthful allegations of harm by Epstein

and his network, not just proximity to his network,

she said.

So if they made the payout,

that means that Jane Doe 4 was abused

and they're tacitly admitting it.

So now the question becomes, what's up with Trump

and how come there hasn't been a full investigation

of what Jane Doe 4 said

and of 600 million the victims only received 125 million

even after a USVI judge had told the fund

and a state no limits were to be put

on survivor compensation.

Michaels also said,

and I said that from the jump.

That should has garbage.

These women should have got the lion share of this money.

Back the brings truck up and pile that money up

on their front lawn.

Nobody else should be getting this money,

not the USVI, not anybody.

Anybody who was victimized by Jeffrey Epstein

should get this money and the younger you were

when the victimization happened,

the more money you should get,

but unfortunately that did not occur.

And the estate is still sitting on a gigantic amount of money.

And I know it's just a gigantic coincidence

that the people that are set up to get that money

when all this is over and done with are in dyke and con.

So yeah, I would say that they have some motivation here

to settle these suits for as little as possible

so that they can come out on the back end

with a gigantic bag.

And as far as Jane Doe 4 goes,

if that settlement was paid,

then of course that leads to a bunch of questions

about what she said, about Donald Trump.

Because if she was credible enough to get a settlement,

shouldn't that mean that she's credible enough

for at the very least a real investigation

into the allegations that she made?

And if not, then the DOJ should provide us information

as to their decision-making

and why they decided not to investigate.

So I think that this has the potential to really blow up.

Will it?

We'll have to see what the documentation says.

But it has that potential

and just like the rest of the stories we're following,

we'll continue to follow this one as well.

All of the information that goes with this episode

can be found in the description box.

Hi, this is Alex Cantrowitz.

I'm the host of Big Technology podcast,

a longtime reporter and an on-air contributor to CNBC.

And if you're like me,

you're trying to figure out how artificial intelligence

is changing the business world and our lives.

So each week on Big Technology,

I bring on key actors from companies building AI tech

and outsiders trying to influence it.

Asking where this is all going,

they come from places like Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon,

and plenty more.

So if you want to be smart with your wallet,

your career choices and meetings with your colleagues

and at dinner parties,

listen to Big Technology podcast wherever you get your podcasts.