
Former Attorney General Bill Barr Gives His Jeffrey Epstein Related Testimony To Congress
About this episode
Critics argue that Barr’s testimony underscored the DOJ’s reluctance to fully own up to systemic failure. His assertion that he was “personally satisfied” with the outcome—and his resistance to acknowledging deeper institutional faults—fueled the notion that his role was protecting narrative more than uncovering truth. The hearing did little to quell concerns, instead leaving many in Congress and the public convinced there’s more yet to emerge.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Barr tells House he saw no evidence linking Trump to Epstein crimes: Comer | Fox News
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Vault: The Epstein Files publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
206 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
The Vault: The Epstein Files — Former Attorney General Bill Barr Gives His Jeffrey Epstein Related Testimony To Congress. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles. So the Dog and Pony show, involving Jeffrey Epstein and Glaine Maxwell, kicked off an earnest yesterday on Capitol Hill with Bill Barr appearing before a Congress to give testimony about Jeffrey Epstein. And when you know it, Bill Barr says that there's no chance whatsoever that Donald Trump could be involved. I mean, who would have ever guessed that Bill Barr would have that kind of commentary? You know, the same Bill Barr, whose father hired Jeffrey Epstein at Dalton when he was the headmaster there, the same Bill Barr who came in and told us that everything was on the up and up when it comes to Epstein. The same Bill Barr that's done nothing but lie through his teeth. When it comes to Epstein, that same guy, sure, the arbiter of truth, Bill Barr. Today's article is from Fox News and the headline Bill Barr testifies he didn't see info that would implicate Trump in Epstein case.
Comers says. So if you're going to tell us what happened at the interview, why not just make a public? Why is this happening behind closed doors? Why is Congress getting these documents so they can go through them before the public sees them? Well, I'll tell you why because they want to control the narrative still. They want to give you sanitized information. They'll say that it's about survivors. They'll say it's about protecting people. But what they really mean is it's about protecting their donors, the people that are funding their campaigns, the people that are paying for their vacations, the people that are letting them use their planes, the people that are funding their political careers. This article was authored by Elizabeth Elkind. Former attorney general Bill Barr told House investigators on Monday that he never saw anything that could tie President Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, sorted crimes. Oversight committee chairman James Comer from Kentucky said, well, that settles the folks.
We can all pack it in. We can all stop investigating and we can all just move on to the next topic, right? Because Bill Barr told us so. I mean, is there anybody who's more likable? Anybody who's more reliable and anybody who's more honest than Bill Barr? I mean, we're talking about the pinnacle of honesty here, folks. He said that he'd never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this. And he believed if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would probably have leaked it out. Comer told reporters partway through Barr's testimony. Yes, sorry. I don't buy that considering that the people on the left, these politicians, they're all in by the same bankers. Oh, they're going to out the whole entire operation, huh? Out themselves. This is called mutually assured destruction. That's why it's never been released. And that's why these goofballs are still sanitizing it. Here's an idea. Let's send the whole entire thing. And there's one way to do that.
Be transparent. That doesn't mean going through Congress and having people like Comer come out and try and run some kind of game on us. Because that's really what the whole point of this is. They're trying to fortify the administration, right? That's the whole point of having Bill Barr come up here and give testimony. Oh, yeah. Look, the attorney general says he saw nothing on this. Yeah. Well, Bichass Bill Barr was in on it. So not exactly what I would call a reliable narrator. The X Trump administration official is the first person to appear in the House oversight committee's probe into the federal government's handling of Epstein's case. And I wish I could tell you folks that I thought that they had good intentions here and that their motivations were pure, but I don't think they are. I think that this is all about trying to give cover to the administration and to try to calm down the base a bit. But I think that this is going to have the opposite effect. I think that people are going to have more questions than we get answers when this whole entire dog and pony shows over and done with like others, the peanut to testify after
him, Barr's deposition is being conducted behind closed doors. Oh, I wonder why. Why is it that we're not having transparency here when the big issue is that everything has been kept under wraps, but sure, let's just compound the problem and let's continue in secrecy like a bunch of boobs. And once again, I ask you, why should we trust anything that Congress is telling us? Have you taken a look at their approval rating lately, but all of a sudden, we should listen to what they're saying and they're not going to try and protect themselves and the power structure that keeps them in power because make no mistake. That's all any of these people care about none of them really care about justice. None of them care about you and they certainly don't care about your kids. Comers said Barr told investigators he didn't know anything about a client list and did not have conversations with Trump about such a list. Well, that's because the list never existed. The whole point of talking about that list was so that later on when it comes out that there is no list.
They can say to you, look, it's just a big conspiracy theory like the rest of it. There are so many traps that have been set throughout this whole entire investigation to make people look cookie. That way they can say the whole entire thing is nothing more than one big conspiracy theory. And this is the blueprint they use every single time. Democrats who were in the room for the first two hours of Barr's deposition were a much more vague about what went on, but they accused Republicans of taking too soft an approach. Oh, I'm sure that they're just going to go hard as fuck on Bill Clinton, right? I'm sure the Democrats are going to let them have it. Meanwhile, they're letting Stacy Plasket slide as we speak. Nobody saying shit about her has anybody called her to the carpet, where all the articles from New York Times or Washington Post or the daily beast, you know, all these outlets that like to talk shit, where are they now? The whole entire selective outrage is completely and utterly unacceptable. You can't pick and choose what you find despicable here. It's all fucking despicable.
No matter who took part, I have more questions now than I did before going in. Representatives, Tujas, Submarineum, total reporters before commerce remarks. Just generally though, I think Democrats side is doing most of the heavy lifting. I don't think we're learning much from the questioning from the House Republicans. It is all a dog and pony show. All they're trying to do is calm things down. That's all this is. I wish it was more. I wish they really cared about what was going on. I wish they really tried to get to the truth. But I'm not going to take part in their bullshit ass narrative. Comer said one asked about those comments. I think it's unfortunate that the Democrats are trying to seems to me politicize this. Oh, yeah, they're the only ones trying to do that, huh? Now, after Bill Clinton gives his deposition, it's going to be the other side claiming the same thing. But the reality is both sides are playing a role. It's like wrestling. They make pretend that they hate each other out in public, but behind closed doors, they're all break and bread.
They're all hanging out together and they're all best friends. And that goes for both sides of the aisle. All of this is performative. Bar served as Attorney General from February 2019 through December 2020 during Trump's first administration. It was his second stint leading the Department of Justice after first holding the job under former president George H. W. Bush. Bar notably led the DOJ when Epstein died by suicide allegedly in August of 2019 while awaiting trial in a New York City jail. And of course, it was just a bunch of coincidences, right? That led to what happened. The machinery broke, the guards fell asleep. They're short staffed and everything just happens at the same time. Okay, I guess if you want to believe that, that's cool. I don't believe it though. He said days later at a fraternal order of police event New Orleans that he was appalled and angry at what he said was the facility's failure to adequately secure this prisoner.
The most important prisoner may be in the whole entire system and you put him in a jail cell with a four time murderer. Please somebody make that make sense because it does not make sense to anybody with a brain. Jeffrey Epstein should have never been in a jail cell with Nicholas Tartaglione. Not for one minute, not for one second yet he was. And then when he allegedly tried to kill himself the first time, he tells the jail and his lawyer that it was Tartaglione that assaulted him. Only to have the BOP clear Tartaglione in about a lot of no 10 minutes and that Tartaglione keep moving. Then after Tartaglione found guilty, he doesn't get the death penalty for killing four people, the federal death penalty. Right. The fix isn't in everything's on the up and up. Bart told the associated press later that year that he was personally involved in investigating Epstein's death, specifically that he reviewed security footage from that night and it said
it showed no one entering the cell that night. The late pedophile died. Well, what if they were there already, like I've said before, we don't know who was in that jail previously. We have no idea. So sure you can run the narrative that nobody went into the jail cell after a certain time and you might be telling the truth, but that's only because somebody was in there previously. And guess what, a lie of omission is still a lie. He eventually concluded Epstein did die by suicide. Bart told the outlet owing to a perfect storm of screw ups at the jail, a perfect storm of screw ups at the jail that has never happened before with any other inmates hasn't happened since. But when we have somebody in that facility who has the secrets that are damning enough to topple whole ass governments, all of this happens at once and that person is the person who dies, huh? When asked if Bart told us much to house investigators on Monday, Comer declined to speak for the former
attorney general, but added he believed the general consensus was that Epstein killed himself with no external foul play. All they're doing is trying to build the narrative to run protection for the administration. How can people not understand this? What this whole entire circus amounts to is trying to give cover to the administration and say, see, look, this is nothing more than a giant hoax, but I think it's going to backfire on them because unlike a lot of the other bullshit that we've seen, a lot of the other news that is fake. This is not. And I think this is a mine feel for everybody involved. Bart's testimony is part of a wider bipartisan investigation into the handling of Epstein's case, which has also reached several former attorney generals, FBI directors and former first couple Bill and Hillary Clinton. Well it didn't reach the people that it needed to reach the most Alex Acosta, Philippe, Mukazi, Vilifana, mental and everybody else involved.
But sure, tell us about this complete investigation that you're engaging in and all these people that you're calling up to Congress to give depositions who have nothing to do with what went on. And here's my prediction. When all said and done, they're going to say, see, look, there's nothing to see here. Everything's on the up and up. And we're being very transparent with you. Meanwhile, they're going to say, trust me, bro, we're not going to get any kind of documentation to back up what they're saying. And then they'll just move on just like they did the first time. And folks, I'm warning you now don't expect much to come from this testimony that any of these people are giving. We're not going to learn anything. Nobody's going to get in trouble because of it. And frankly, I highly doubt we're going to learn anything new. So obviously we're going to keep following along and we'll see where it all goes. But I am less than impressed with day number one. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.
More episodes
More from The Vault: The Epstein Files

The USVI Unleashes More Exhibits Detailing JP Morgan's Ties To Jeffrey Epstein (...
The Vault: The Epstein Files

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The Evidence Pointing To Who Was On The Plane...
The Vault: The Epstein Files

Mega Edition: The Epstein Survivors And Their Secondary Role In Their Own Stor...
The Vault: The Epstein Files

Mega Edition: Prince Andrew And The Silence That Told Us Everything We Needed T...
The Vault: The Epstein Files