Inside China's "American Mao" (ft. Asra Nomani)

In 2024, a truck crashed into Canaw in Moresque, where I work.

146 of our dogs needed homes fast.

We asked for help on Facebook.

Our stories spread through WhatsApp messages and Instagram reposts.

Immediately, people stepped up.

And just six hours later, every dog was fostered.

I'll never forget how our community showed up for us.

Learn however, 3.5 billion people connect to what matters with meta

at meta.com slash community.

That's pure automotive joy.

I'm Peter, the owner of Muscle Car Junior.

It started as a hobby, then I started posting about it.

Before I knew it, I built a business for storing muscle cars

on Facebook Marketplace, and the community of car lovers on Instagram.

Today, new customers send me what's app messages from all over.

Not bad for a hobby.

Learn how meta helps over 35 million American businesses,

like Peter's Grow, at meta.com slash community.

Never always sing them the sinister figure behind.

The left, the protests, the money, the deep dot investigation

with Fox News Investigator reporter, Izra Nomani.

It is Wilkane Country, normally streaming live every Monday through Thursday

at 12 o'clock Eastern time at the Wilkane Country YouTube channel

and on Facebook, which you're going to always hang out with us

by following us to Spotify or on Apple.

All week, we have been diving deep into what seems

like an organic protest movement on the left.

Whether it's ICE, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, defending Nicholas Maduro,

arguing against the war in Iran is the same placards,

the same signs, the same font, and the same money,

the same organization behind the left.

And it all ties back to one man, Neville Roy Singer,

an American citizen living in China.

Today, we have Ozra Nomani with us to continue her five-part

deep dive investigation plus a tinful pat to today's an eye.

We'll work ourselves through some of the news of the week

on this episode of Wilkane Country.

What's up, guys?

What's up?

I'm between here in New York, is that the goal?

I'm not going to split.

No, why would I split time between here in New York?

Yeah.

Every other week in New York?

Yeah.

So Dallas to New York on Tuesday couldn't have gone better.

I have this argument with Ellie all the time.

Dallas Fort Worth Airport, I think,

is awesome.

It's OK.

I have never encountered.

I know everybody says that.

Maybe I'm a homer on this, but I've never encountered a security

line that's really more than a couple of minutes.

I fly through security at Dallas Fort Worth.

Now, it's huge and sprawling and all that.

And there's a problem if they say you want to change terminals

and you've got to get on a train and all that stuff.

But the only problem I have with Dallas Fort Worth

is actually leaving the airport.

When you get off your plane, you go to the gate.

You have to walk.

Where's the exit from this airport?

That's the only bad thing.

My point is, flew through security.

No delays.

And I'm flying what?

Was it 24 or 48 hours after the plane crash at LaGuardia?

48?

So when I landed in New York, Sunday night,

when I landed in New York, I saw the plane still

propped up on its tail on the runway.

That freaked out.

But yet I had no delays.

It's kind of freaky to see.

It really is.

Yeah.

It's a little bit like COVID where you go through the world.

And we live in this world that we accept and think

has a certain level of sanity to it

and a certain level of security to it.

And it just takes one little thing to realize it's all

of a near.

It's a fingernail deep.

You scratch the surface for a moment.

All of a sudden, everybody's looking at you

because you didn't wipe down your groceries

or don't come near me.

You know, this patina of civilization

that we all live within is so fragile.

And I've heard guys like Rob O'Neill, famous lead,

seal team six, killed someone bin Laden,

says like, you're 24 hours away from what

did he say to be one time at a baseball game?

I was at a Yankee game with Rob and he goes,

I think he said we're 24 hours away from people

eating each other.

Like, dude, we're not 24 hours from that.

In your world.

But he's like one eating.

72.

One EMP.

It could be 72, Patrick.

One EMP, kill the electricity.

How long until we're savages again?

And after COVID, my belief is, it ain't as long

as you want to believe.

Like in your head, you're probably

thinking a couple of years, right?

Maybe six months.

It's not.

But what would the kids do without the internet?

I don't know where their minds would go.

If they realized they couldn't look at phones anymore,

I feel like they would go crazy first.

Well, that's going to happen.

That's the impact of the first two hours.

But the clean water and food in the next 48 hours.

Survival skills.

That's going to be a thing.

But my point is when you land at an airport

and you see a crashed airplane like that right there,

it just all of a sudden cuts past the fingernail

into the quick and you're like, yeah, man, this is all.

We just kind of like, yeah, planes

are supposed to just land and take off safely, you know,

and all that stuff.

It wasn't a landing or a takeoff, I think.

I think it was just taxing.

It's taxing issue, yeah.

So that's the big deal better.

Was it was landing?

No, it was a taxing issue.

Yeah, he was landing.

No, no.

No, you're wrong, Dan.

I literally saw he was landing at the end of a land.

It happened at the end of a land.

It happened five seconds after touching ground.

Because he was slow down.

He was in the process of slowing down.

And I mean, I interviewed the guy that was on the plane.

I got the only interview on Fox.

I learned this week in New York,

of anybody that was on the plane.

He said he knew immediately when they landed

because the brakes hit super hard, super fast.

Like, everybody lunged forward.

And then I saw the press conference.

They literally counted it down from like seven seconds

or eight seconds until I impact.

So it was, I told that story of my dog getting hit

by the bike and not to make light of this.

Like the confluence of events that needed to happen

for my dog to get hit by the bike.

Like that's sort of what this was for the controller

to tell the truck to go right at that moment,

right when he was landing.

It just like, boom.

Did you listen to our traffic control of the situation?

It's crazy.

Like how it happened.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure.

But my return trip from New York to Dallas,

not the same kind of luck.

I ended the show at five.

I was probably in my car at five Eastern time.

I was probably my car at five, 15, five, 20.

I knew it was gonna be a little tight.

My flight was at seven.

I got to the airport in New York traffic.

I always, yeah, I got to the airport at six, 10.

All right, it boards at six, 15.

Now in Dallas, honestly, that's not a problem.

And I've had my moments at LaGuardia where it's not a problem.

I've got all the things pre-check clear.

I got all the things.

I walk in, dude.

And that line is all the way through.

All the, you know, where you check your bags and do all that.

And then there's this hallway at LaGuardia

that goes to a parking garage.

And it's all the way down that hallway

towards the parking garage.

And I get in it.

I mean, I immediately know, and I call American,

because I'm, I'm concierge key status.

And I'm like, all right, you know, what do we do?

They said, maybe we can get you to the front of the line.

It's such a big time remove.

And, but then they said they couldn't.

They couldn't.

And they said, it's a two-hour line.

And then I grabbed a lady.

I just asked her, hey, how long is this line?

And they said about an hour.

So I knew I was missing my flight.

So I started working on my backup flight.

But man, damned if that line didn't move faster

than any roller coaster amusement six flags ride

I've ever seen.

I mean, it just kept moving and moving.

You never stood still.

You just kept walking.

And I get to the front, and this is what I see.

I've got it up on my screen here in the studio.

Who's working the thing where you walk up

and you get your picture taken?

And you're, they take you ready?

Ice.

And these dudes, there's three of them where I was.

They were the most professional, pleasant,

efficient dudes you've ever seen.

Of course, I said thank you for being here.

I appreciate you.

They were processing that line.

And to be fair, now it's TSA that's doing the X-ray machines.

So that has to keep moving too.

And they processed that line.

I was through there at 6.35, boarding started at 6.25.

I hustled to the gate, got there at 6.46.45,

and got on the plane.

You made your flight?

Made it.

Boom.

Get at it.

Miracle.

Made my flight.

No way.

Yeah.

I forgot you're not on the other, the other special.

Thank you, guys.

You know some people are shaking their boots

seeing ice at the, at that booth, checking their passports.

You know, I wondered that because there are people saying

it's true.

This is an amazing PR move by the Trump administration

for ice, because they're out there handing out water.

They're giving Heimlich's to kids.

You saw that video.

There's a kid choking, an ice agent runs in,

saves his life, gives him the Heimlich.

And they're sitting here doing this job.

I, I think, I wondered, we're in New York.

How many of these people hate ice?

Think they're Donald Trump stormtroopers,

and then have to acknowledge that ice is doing a job

to keep us all moving right here.

You know, I don't, it's a great PR move, I guess.

And yeah, thanks for getting us through to my flight.

Yeah.

We're going to be joined today by Osir and Amani,

again, on the fifth installment of our series

on Neville Roy Singham.

Before we get to Osir, we have introduced

Will Call on Fridays, advice and questions from you

that will, will issue.

And we do have a couple.

Patrick, why don't you pick your favorite

and let's run through one before we get to Osir and Amani.

Listen Will.

I'm getting really tired of the militia.

They don't understand the concept here.

I've had a lot of people.

We said, give Will, ask Will your best.

We want your, we want you, but you have problems with.

Will will answer them.

He'll give you advice.

I understand.

I try to, I've made it as clear as possible.

And they're like, why would I want advice from Will Cain?

I don't know.

But these are the best we can do.

I don't know what it is.

Okay.

I would want your advice.

I like, I don't know.

I think you have a really good advice.

Anyway, but Nathan Thun said, why can't I find a girlfriend?

It's a little too generic, but we don't know Nathan.

We don't know Nathan.

Yeah, I know.

I need more information.

I need more information.

Okay.

I can do this.

How tall are you?

Is the question, how tall is he?

Tell me if you guys, tell me if you guys disagree with this.

Okay.

Let's let's lay out something.

Okay.

Dan, where'd you go to college?

New England Institute of Technology.

Oh, I don't think I ever knew that.

Rhode Island.

New England Institute of Technology.

Audio engineering video.

Okay.

Do they call it Rhode Island Institute of Technology?

Do they call it New England?

It's any IT, New England Tech, essentially.

There's all, there's RIT there.

Rhode Island Technology, School of Technology.

Oh, that's a different school.

Yeah.

And Patrick, you're Florida State?

No, well, I was a community college here in Jacksonville

and then got accepted and then just didn't go.

So.

Okay, and I'm Pepperdine.

So we have, we have differences,

but we are the same in this respect.

Okay, my son, I think I've said,

is headed off to the University of Texas.

And insanely, guys, the fraternity thing

at UT starts the last semester

of your senior year of high school.

Like, this is when it starts and it ends

before you get to school, which is insane

because how do you do that?

Like, I can't imagine a kid showing up from out of state

and like, what do you mean?

This thing's already over.

And like, you go to school like Florida State

with the University of Texas and a really big school,

size wise, you're gonna, my advice to my son

has always been, you're gonna have to find a way

to make it small.

You have to.

You gotta find a way to find some guys.

Like New York City.

Right, and the easiest and most,

and most, most inertia-driven path of that

is to do a fraternity.

There are other ways to do it as well.

But the fraternity is a thing and look, it's honest.

It's a lot of fun.

Now, you know, I'm giving a lot of advice speeches.

What doesn't seem nice?

The hazing doesn't seem great.

Yeah, for sure.

But, you know, man, I've started, my algorithm,

because my son is going through,

this is kind of full with this stuff.

And like, I've started to see post about the value

of hazing to masculine culture.

Like, it has a real value.

And I do think that's true.

I think some of it, I think alcohol-based hazing

is beyond absurd.

And I don't think they do that.

I found that out last week, back in our day,

my day, my age, it definitely was.

It definitely was.

Even on sports teams, okay, not just fraternities.

And it's the stupidest thing that,

that's how you kill people.

Bottom line, that's how you kill people.

And we know people that have died.

I know people that have died through that process.

But the hazing that they're doing now,

apparently doesn't involve as much of that kind of stuff.

But it still, look, it just takes one bad apple

on the hazing thing.

That's the problem.

It takes, you know, a little too far.

I have this thing of, I've often said,

in Patrick, you had to tell me if Osir

is waiting and listening to this

because I don't think this is an Osir comment.

She is.

She is.

You know, it's fine.

She is?

Okay.

Well, I'll try to go quickly through this.

I have said to my friends,

I don't think I've ever said this to you guys.

And I said it on ESPN.

There are three kinds of guys in the world.

And only three kinds of guys.

And I'm gonna try to use the appropriate language here

for this.

There are A-holes.

There are D-bags and there are Ricks.

If you pick up what I'm putting down.

Okay?

A-holes, tools, tool, D-bag, kind of the same, right?

And Ricks.

Okay, there's three kinds of guys.

Okay.

In my estimation, and A-hole is a bull in the China closet.

Yeah, he's gonna hurt feelings.

And yeah, he's gonna be a problem here and there,

but he isn't doing it intentionally.

It's just sort of innate to his nature.

In a way, he almost can't help it.

A D-bag is ultimately harmless.

He ultimately is.

The only person he is hurting is himself.

He's trying too hard.

He is doing too much.

And ultimately, he really is only hurting himself.

Yeah.

A Rick, which you know I'm not really using that word,

but is one who puts other people down

in order to lift himself up.

A lot like the D-bag, he is driven in some sense

by some insecurity, but his insecurity manifests

not in trying too hard,

but in creating this little totem pole of hierarchy

that he only can really elevate himself

if he can identify people below him.

And he will do his best to put people below him.

He's the guy that makes the intentionally hurtful joke

but tries to laugh it off as always just being funny.

Do you know what I'm saying?

Do you think I'm pretty?

That's pretty.

Those three guys, it only takes one Rick

in a fraternity hazing class to make it bad, right?

That's who you're worried about mostly.

And there is gonna be one in almost every scenario.

So, but what I'm getting at is the hazing thing

has some value to a society of creating a group of guys

that belong together that go through something hard.

Even if it's stupid and arbitrary,

it does have some masculine value.

I do happen to believe that to be true.

But getting back to Nathan, my advice to my son,

like he's going down to Austin,

he's doing some of these events.

And it's a hard thing to do

because you're walking into rooms where you don't know people

and you've got to get to know them.

Because the hardest thing to be is anonymous, right?

Rejection in these scenarios is often less about,

I don't like you, you're not one of us.

And more about, I don't know you.

Why would I, you know what I mean?

And so the challenge is, and I do think it's a life skill

to walk into a room and just get to know some guys.

And be as authentic version of yourself as you can,

not to glaze everybody, not to be the loudest guy

in the room, so everybody notices you,

not to be the drunkest, not any of those things, right?

But just also not be a wallflower.

My suspicion is with a lot of guys out there,

and I can't say Nathan,

because you didn't give me a lot of information,

is that when it comes to girls,

it's the same thing going on.

You are allowing yourself to remain anonymous.

You have to go into the room and make yourself known.

You are going to strike out.

You're not going to get every fraternity bit.

Not every guy is going to like you.

All these things.

But your solution will not be to recluse yourself

in any type of way to protect your ego.

You're the fragility of your ego.

You're going to have to take, and it breaks my heart, fellas.

I hear stories all the time, guys and girls,

fraternity sororities, high school clicks.

I mean, I'm telling you, whatever my wife says,

this is my thing, kids being left out

or pushed out on the outer side of a circle,

I hate it so effing much.

I hate it so much.

And it's so hard on these kids

that probably have to deal with a ton of it.

But that being said, if you can figure out who you are

and how to deal with rejection,

you are going to be so much better in the long run for it.

And that includes with girls as well.

So the best piece of advice I got for you, Nathan,

and why don't I have a girlfriend?

And again, I don't know your circumstances,

is you're gonna have to get in there and mix it up.

You're gonna have to.

You're gonna have to walk into the proverbial room

where you don't know somebody.

You're gonna have to walk up to the girl

wherever she is at the bar.

Hey, man, on the subway.

A lot of my buddies disagree with me on that.

But like, I was the guy that if I were on the subway,

I didn't live in New York single.

Dan, you do.

And I saw a girl that peaked my interest.

I could.

I would speak to her.

I 100% would.

And so, I mean, it's that famous line.

What is that movie?

Or it's sad not live, you know, Eddie Murphy is like,

you know, what's your thing?

He's like, hey, I want to jump your bones.

That's not, that's not the line.

And he's like 99 times out of 100.

She slaps my face, but that one time is magical.

You know, like, yeah, I'm not saying that's your,

that's not your goal, that's not your line,

but the philosophy in there is right.

That's also you being not from New York.

I feel like New York guys won't do that.

Like, you know, the guy Greg, we work with here, you know,

Greg, young guy, single.

He lives in New York City, he's from Ohio.

And now he goes up to girls everywhere in New York City

and has no qualms about doing it.

But I think that's because he's from the Midwest.

So he just goes up to girls in Subway.

Yeah, I think so.

So I just don't think like New York centric guys

are, they're like too cool to talk to girls Subway.

Yeah, I think too cool will kill you in anything.

Yeah, in anything too cool will kill you.

Yeah, stop wearing a puppy and judge too.

That's right.

Our age, like, I'm almost 40.

You're clearly over 40.

And it's like you just stop caring what people think

after a while, you know, but it takes a long time.

And the quicker you can, yeah, you're right.

But the quicker you can get there, the better.

And that's hard to ask of an 18, 19, 20 year old,

even a 25 year old, but the quicker you can get there,

the better.

So that's my advice, Nathan Thun,

unless you give me more information.

Maybe you are doing that and your lines are all failing.

Then we got a different workshop.

That's a different classroom, that's down the hall.

That's dating 102.

Put the screen down, give it outside in a future class.

Let's take quick break.

We'll be right back on Wilkane Country.

Introducing Home Care Plus, a new subscription service

from Lowe's that helps make life easier

by giving members a hand with home maintenance.

Let Lowe's tackle the tasks you keep meaning to do

like electric dryer vent cleaning, replacing hard

to reach light bulbs, and more.

Subscribe to Home Care Plus for just $99 a year

and consider your to-do list done.

Members give more at Lowe's.

Available in Selects and Code Zone will cancel anytime,

not refundable fee, product purchase required,

terms and service restrictions apply,

details of Lowe's.com slash terms, subject to change.

Join Fox in supporting our troops from daily needs

of global emergencies.

Help us be there for those who serve.

Visit go.fox slash Red Cross to donate to service

to the Armed Forces today.

This is Ainsley Earhart.

Thank you for joining me for the 52 episode podcast series,

The Life of Jesus.

A listening experience that will provide hope, comfort

and understanding of the greatest story ever told.

Listen and follow now at FoxNewsPodcasts.com

or wherever you listen to podcasts.

Welcome back to Wilkane Country.

Ozerna Monty is a Fox News digital investigate reporter

who's joined us throughout the week

on her deep dive five part series uploaded at FoxNews.com.

On the money and the organization behind the protest

movements on the left, and it tracing back

to one particular man, Neville Roycing.

Ozerna, get this, I got a text yesterday

from a friend, kind of quasi related.

But anyway, he texted me, his text was simple.

I mean, just if I can remember, it was in RS is a POS.

Wow.

And what?

Well, here's what stuck out to me.

A, he now knows who Neville Roycing amazes.

B, he has an acronym for him.

It's getting colloquial.

It's breaking through, Ozerna.

Yeah.

And today I have a new term for him that it came to me.

Again, almost pulling an all night or last night

will, but I did sleep a few hours.

Get some sleep, Ozerna.

Don't worry.

You can look this good on little sleep.

So today on our headline is we call him

the new American Mao in Shanghai.

Because this is the document that I

want to make sure you read in your weekend reading, OK?

Let me see, can you see it?

OK, I'm going to take it out of the glare.

Yeah, but the title's fuzzy.

Tell me what it reads.

It says, the aviate anniversary of the victory

in the world anti-fascist war.

Does anyone know what that is?

The world anti-fascist war?

Is that World War II?

It's World War II.

So he has rewritten out of China's history

narrative what's World War II.

And these are my favorite tools as a journalist.

The three-ring binder, right, with a post-it notes

and the three-ring binder cutter.

So in this document, it literally

says that this study was written by Neville Roy Singham.

So he is the author.

And he immediately asks in one page here on Figure 5,

who paid the price, the death distribution

in the world anti-fascist war?

And then he has a chart, I know it's all blurry,

but you can see the blur.

At the highest is the USSR and China.

And then it's the colonies, the Axis powers,

Eastern and Southern Europe.

And at the very end is the Anglo-American contribution.

And he says it was only less than a million.

So what he's doing is a numbers game

to try to rewrite the history so that China gets credit

for defeating fascism.

And then in this paper, in this document, 178 pages,

what he argues is that democracy and capitalism

become fascism.

And that the real tension is between socialism and fascism,

not democracy versus socialism.

So it's academic and it's mental gymnastics.

But at the end of it all, what he's preaching

is Mao's philosophy.

And so dawned on me about four in the morning last night

that what he has become is a new American Mao in Shanghai.

Does that make sense?

You know, let's entertain this for just a moment.

OK, I just want to think through this.

OK, so I'm sure the numbers that he's quoting

are actually accurate.

Yeah.

You're measuring a contribution to the victory

in terms of the quantity of loss, the sacrifice.

Well, most of those Chinese deaths,

I believe, if I remember my history correctly, were in China.

It was the Japanese invading China and killing Chinese in China.

So does that amount to victory?

I know you told us yesterday that he

argues that tied up the Japanese and allowed American advances.

But I will tell you this, that in our history,

Russia probably doesn't get enough credit

for its contributions to the victory in World War II.

Like Russia's eastern front really did tie up the Germans.

And they advanced and they got to Berlin first, right?

And I don't know what on that chart it says,

but I'm sure the Russians lost a ton of people.

But you cannot diminish the Western front.

You cannot diminish D-Day.

You cannot diminish the American advance

through the Pacific Islands.

And ultimately, the moral questions of it aside,

the bombs that did end World War II in the Western,

in the Pacific theater with Japanese.

So you just can't rewrite history to see victory only

through the lens of the number of bodies lost on your side.

Yeah, so what happens is that he argues as a China

and the Chinese Communist Party that it was China holding

off Japan that allowed Russia to Soviet Union

to go fight Germany, and that they defeated Japan so decisively

that America's use of the nuclear weapon was unnecessary.

And that this glorification also of the actions

in Iwo Jima and other places was Western propaganda.

But we'll, you know, it goes back to something

that we were talking about yesterday.

To me, life doesn't have to be compared.

And casualties and loss and death don't have to be judged,

which was more valuable than the other as he's trying to do.

And that is at the heart of the moral and ethical flaw

with a lot of the arguments of this effort

that we've even seen in the US to bring communism

past the socialism onto our streets.

Because they create this new hierarchy of human value

where the white person is less in contribution

and even value as somebody that they have decided

is more valuable.

Yeah, so that's what I also get from this study

is that it's a continuation of that degradation

of people for your own ideological cause, which, to me,

is very important.

I'll let you talk one other thing.

We talked about this yesterday, and I think you agreed

with me that it sounds like what he's created

is a binary through which to see the world.

And the only true forms of societal organization

are either fascism or communism.

Here's what's kind of interesting about that.

OK, you and I agreed, that's not the binary.

And it erases a huge middle ground,

including democracies and constitutional republics

and parliamentary forms of government,

all of their forms of government.

But he argues those are all somewhere

on the continuum leading somewhere towards fascism.

And he provides as its opposite communism or socialism.

Well, first, I sit there and I think one thing I'll grant

is the middle ground that is a relatively modern phenomenon.

We're like two, two, 300 years into this idea

that we can be self-governed in some form,

constitutional republic democracy.

But so too is communism.

Communism is like 150 years old.

It's brand new.

There's no model in human history of that form of government

ever being sustainable or successful, none.

And so truthfully, fascism is the normal course

of human organization and civilizations.

Kings, theocracies, whatever it may be.

And that's not an argument for fascism.

It's just to say, you're not the binary socialism communism.

You're not the other end of the scale.

You're even more new than the other options we've developed.

And you've put yourself on an equal playing field

to the one option human beings chose through thousands of years,

which was one great leader.

Yeah, because really tyranny is a product of humanity also.

I mean, the conquerors, the conquest, the empires.

What were they?

But tyrannies, they were autocratic rules

of individual people, usually personality driven.

And we don't always think of it that way.

I mean, but what was Cleopatra?

Was she elected?

What was Julius Caesar?

What was, you know, a till of the hunt?

A till of the hunt, at all of the conquerors through time.

And if anybody is watching and wondering,

is this just an esoteric conversation that we're having?

I just wanted to ground us in the fact

that we're talking about these issues

because this movement that Neville Roy Singham has funded

over nearly a decade has done an inversion

on the American experience so that we now speak

the language of these fascism as a possible,

as what America is expressing.

And I'm going to just show you

the strangest examples that I found.

I got this in Pittsburgh.

It was at a protest.

This one was after Venezuela.

It was a promodoro protest.

So just think that like, this is a protest for a man

who has been a tyrant to in his nation.

And I picked this up.

And what they're talking about here is fight.

Oh, I'm so sorry about this blur.

It's because of the setting I put on.

But it says fight capitalism, fight for socialism.

They're putting it on these cute little scarves.

And then it goes on to the other side.

There's that one fight, fight racism, fight for socialism,

fight everything, fight sexism, fight for socialism.

So it's creating that binary you were just talking about.

And then, of course, what's the fourth corner?

What's the fourth corner?

I can't miss it.

Fight transphobia.

Transphobia, boom.

I've missed that.

They've the best one for last.

But this is a cute little product.

I vet mode them because it's a good capitalist system

when you go to the socialist protest.

And you can vet mode for your communist publication

and your socialist scarf.

But this is how they're putting out

these cute little products in order

to sell these very complex ideas that are actually

a false binary, just like you said.

Let's say a quick break, but continue this conversation

with Fox News Investigator reporter,

Ozren Amani, on Wilkane Country.

Right now, new fan duel customers can get up to $300 back

in bonus bets every day for 10 days.

Place a tournament bet using the token.

And if it doesn't win, you'll get up to $300 back

in bonus bets every single day for 10 days straight.

You can even mix things up with same game parles

for a shot at a bigger payout.

Fan duel.

It's time to dance.

21 plus in president's lexates, bonus bets

are nonwithdrawable and expire seven days after receive.

Tokens are received in increments of one per day.

Restrictions apply.

See terms at sportsbook.fandal.com.

Gamling problem called 1-800-Gamler.

Welcome back to Wilkane Country.

We're still hanging out with Fox News

investigative reporter, Ozren Amani, on her deep dive

into the sinister figure that is, Neville Roy Singham.

Yeah.

Really, really interesting.

What do you, what, you've done this series now?

And I know that you've spoken to some American politicians.

Because a lot of people watching go through this,

they're like, well, what can you do about it?

What can be done?

And there are some politicians in Washington, D.C.,

who have opened investigations.

Is there not into Neville Roy Singham?

Yeah, we actually hadn't spoken about that.

And I thought, wow, we need to discuss it.

So thanks for bringing to that level, which is that day one,

I wrote that Justice Department, Treasury Department,

and State Department are all investigating

Neville Roy Singham in his network.

And then the House Ways and Means Committee,

which is one of the most powerful committees governing tax,

is investigating Neville Roy Singham

as is the House Oversight Committee.

And so some folks might wonder, why Treasury?

Because many of these organizations operate

with nonprofits called 501-C3s.

There's 1501-C4 in there.

And that means that you get tax deductible donations.

So all the money that Neville Roy Singham

poured into these organizations was a tax deduction for him

and that year when he made a lot of money

off the sale of the business thought works.

So that's one benefit you get.

A second benefit is that you don't have to pay taxes

on everything.

So you go to your local office depot

and you can show them your EIN number as a nonprofit.

And you don't have to pay taxes, which I bet everybody here

would love to do.

And so the idea with this is that many people

might know in history that Al Capone was notoriously

associated with murder and serious crimes.

But the way that he was sent to jail

was through tax evasion.

And the tax laws are very low-hanging fruit

in this kind of debate about big ideas like foreign,

malign foreign influence and other things.

But importantly, what a tax lawyer told me

was that free speech, of course,

is one of the most fundamental rights in the United States.

But when you are representing the statements and viewpoints

of a foreign entity in the United States,

you do have to register as a foreign agent.

And you do not yet free speech rights

if you are just talking, representing

the Islamic Republic of Iran or the people's

Republic of China.

And so that's one of the laws that the Justice Department

oversees.

And the State Department has already

put out a report in which they've

called two of those organizations

in Neville Roy's Singham's network, vectors of influence

for China.

And when you identify them in that way,

you're now exploring this issue of whether they

are acting as actors of malign foreign influence, which

are three words that I hope everyone will kind of roll

around in their minds.

Because this is a place called the NDNI National

Directorate of Intelligence.

It was stood up after 9-11.

And they have a malign foreign influence unit

as does the FBI.

And so those are some of the areas of the problem.

Yeah, the foreign agent.

The foreign agent thing is one that

occurs to me that he should have to register as a foreign agent.

And then this money would be subject

to some other types of regulations and oversight.

And it would probably neuter in some ways

a lot of these organizations' ability

to do what they do.

Yeah, so at the end of this, Azra, five-part series,

a lot of your time, a lot of hard work, months, I know.

What is your biggest takeaway for everyone listening

that they should know, not just about Neville Roy's Singham,

but what they see when it comes to everyone of these protests?

Well, I hope everybody will tune in

as you talk more about this issue,

because I'm hoping I've heard that you might have on a propaganda

scholar that I interviewed named Nancy Snow.

And I studied propaganda myself when I was in grad school.

And it is so important to basically understand

who is the source of any information that you get,

and what are their objectives,

and who may be funding that communication to you.

There are many ideas that we've introduced

through this series that I hope people will think about

when they receive any information,

including what you're hearing today, you know,

just evaluate, like, Will, what is Will trying to get?

What's his objective in this?

What's Azra trying to do?

It's just like you asked me right now,

I wanted to bring transparency to this process

of this messaging that has been happening on the streets.

I would go into the protests,

and I could connect the dots and see the signals,

and see, you know, an operation, a business operation.

And my journalism is trained to follow the money.

So there's concepts like narrative warfare,

smokeless war, cognitive warfare, information warfare.

Every single person is a target of that kind of warfare.

I had to look up myself, what does kinetic actually mean?

And it means usually when there is a violence.

And sometimes these protests can become kinetic,

but mostly they're called non-kinetic.

And that's another type of warfare.

And so I just would hope that people would look below

the iceberg, as they say, sometimes,

and explore what is behind the information

that they are getting.

Well, the best thing they can do to get that started

is to head out where to FoxNews.com,

the final installment in this five-part series,

on Neville Roycing, I'm in the money and organization

behind the protests on the left.

An incredible piece of work done by Oz and Amani,

FoxNews, investigative, digital reporters.

Thank you so much, Oz, for being with us all throughout this week

and doing this job.

Absolutely, well, and tomorrow is the famous No Kings protests.

I'm gonna get on a plane and go to St. Paul for that

and follow the money there.

And this is a conversation that I hope will keep happening.

Yeah, I'm just going for this Springsteen concert

that they're gonna have and a siding of Jane Fonda.

But, you know, this is not the end.

We're gonna keep at it.

All right, good, good for you, Oscar.

Thank you so much.

Good to see you again.

There she goes, Oz and Amani.

We're back now with 10 full pat and two a days, Dan.

And another question from the militia,

the militia.

Do you want me to pick it Patrick?

Or do you want to pick your next favorite one?

Yeah, why don't you pick it?

You see, yeah, go ahead.

Crazy.

Okay.

Let's go with maybe, there's a lot of serious ones

to your point, like political ones.

You know what I mean?

Chris asks, I have a question since you're a lawyer.

Yes, I am, Chris.

If an illegal immigrant broke federal law

crossing the border along, along with murdering a US citizen,

shouldn't the DOJ handle that as a death penalty case?

That's right.

Great question, right?

Like, why don't we go straight to deportation?

And the answer is yes, right?

Yes, death penalty.

I mean, that's a state by state thing.

It's not really a DOJ thing, I guess.

I guess we do have reds involved, but that should be us.

Yeah.

Yeah, but murder, I don't know, that's interesting.

If murder is committed by an illegal immigrant,

does that make it a federal case?

It depends on if you think it's justice, right?

So like, I mean, you think about like levels of terror.

But not every murder is, but not every murder,

the feds can't, it has to qualify to be a federal case.

You're crossing it, you're crossing it.

It's usually, according to the particular,

that's federal.

It started that way.

What was it?

What was it?

Ken Kuchichili, I'm approaching his name,

but didn't they declare this an invasion back in the day?

So technically, it's like an active terrorism.

Yeah, I don't know, but I mean, for sure,

somebody, a state or a fed, should be pursuing this

according to the death penalty.

Dan, look this up.

Yeah.

Let's have the death penalty right now.

How many states are doing it?

And then there's a question, not just,

do you have it on the books as a law,

but are you actually carrying out the death penalty?

Because I think, isn't it California technically has it

on its books, but hasn't carried out?

27 states.

Capital punishment and

have capital punishment.

States, but does that include, does that include

California, for example, and when's the last time

California actually executed someone?

Let's do that.

So I don't think 27 states are actually doing the death penalty.

To have it on the books, you could be sentenced to it,

but it never actually happens.

Yeah, there's a difference between active and inactive.

The last execution in California

was 2006 in January of 2006.

It's more recent.

Really need to be honest.

We need to pump those numbers up.

The execution chamber has been dismantled

by Governor Gavin Newsom.

Really?

Mm-hmm.

Yeah.

Yep.

What a failed state.

And he for real is going to run for president.

And he's probably going to be the leader.

And it's just like, talk about failing your way up.

There's literally nothing on his resume

that suggests competent leadership.

He's bad for the death penalty.

Nothing other than aura.

That's all you need to win back to the Democrat party.

Do you think maybe we should just stop trying in life,

like, just start or a maxing?

Like, just focus on how to get my aura up.

Yeah.

So like, well, you know, like who the kids are

into clovicular looks maxing guy, right?

Everyone's so dumb.

Didn't he say Gavin Newsom should be president

because he's looks max?

Probably.

Because it is aura.

I think he said something like that.

So to your point, Patrick, like,

I mean, I'm the one also who said that I read

that it's 80% how you look.

Right.

80% how you look.

So.

Yeah, he said he said over JD Vance

because Mr. Newsom looks more in shape than Mr. Vance

is what clovicular said.

Yeah.

But Vance is out.

He's a former Marine out there running on the beach

and stuff.

I mean, like,

but, you know, it's not like he's not in shape.

It looks aura.

It might be the beard.

Is taking away.

The beard is taking away.

I think I think a beard is great.

Have we reached?

Have we gone over peak beard?

I'm talking to two bearded men.

Oh, Patrick, are you doing a goatee?

It's a goatee.

Is that what you're doing?

I've always done this.

Yeah, the circle beard technically.

Yes.

It's so 19.

I like to embrace my inner.

Really?

They're back.

Goatee's are back.

Of course, the 90s are back.

Yeah.

Have we reached peak beard?

And we've gone over peak beard, right?

You mean like it's open.

It's open.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Like, there was a time when beards were cool.

20 times.

20 times.

And they got super popular.

2010s when I had a beard.

And then, and then people, like, I answered the winners are on the, I think the beards

are on the decline.

Don't you think?

I would say so.

Mustaches came back in a huge, huge way.

Women love mustaches.

It used to be like when we were growing up, if you had a mustache, you're like a creepy guy.

Do they?

I, I've been doing research on this.

I have.

Weirdly.

There are a lot of women on the internet that were like, I didn't know what I thought about

the mustache, but I do like the mustache because they did side by side with a guy with a

mustache and without.

And they always liked him with having said that it takes a certain guy to be able to pull

it off.

You have to be like super handsome and muscular.

My dad was in shape.

My dad was a mustache guy.

So is mine.

My dad.

So 80s were mustache.

And so you're right.

The mustache is back.

Um, but I'm not sure guys who bought it completely.

Top Gun did it.

When that new Top Gun movie came out, that's what did it.

Like Tom Celic is you say there's only two guys.

Tom Celic's one.

I was going to guess who they were.

Yeah.

Yeah.

For sure.

Tom Celic is the king of the mustache, right?

Right.

Who is ready for everyone?

I mean, you can't go full.

No.

You can't go full Sam Elliott.

You can't go full Sam Elliott because he's always sort of in the cowboy character.

Like Tom Celic did it regardless of the character.

Right.

And it translated.

I feel like Sam Elliott was too tied to his cowboy image.

So who had the versatile mustache besides Tom Celic?

Um, Bert.

Oh, did Bert have a mustache?

Yes, Bert Rose.

Is that what you're thinking, Patrick?

That's what I was thinking.

Smoky in the band of mustache.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

What you do.

What you look up.

See that answer.

I said actors most known for their mustache.

There's a lot.

There's not a lot back in the day.

I mean, Sam Elliott's in their Clark Gable, Groucho Marx.

But that's not really what we're talking about.

Nick Offermann.

You know, Mark's have a head.

Is there a mustache?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Um, which is really much like a Hitler mustache, right?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Is it a Charlie Chaplin?

It's like one guy ruined the whole pool, you know?

What guy ruined that terrible mustache style?

Michael Jordan for all the fashion cycles.

Yeah.

And if Michael Jordan can't do it, nobody can.

So like of all the fashion cycles that have come and gone,

you know, the beard comes and goes, the goatee comes and goes,

the mustache comes and goes, bell bottoms, skinny jeans in and out,

the frickin mustache that Groucho Marx and Charlie Chaplin did

was killed by Adolf Hitler and never to come back.

And if Michael Jordan can't bring it back, nobody can't.

So you're right.

Here's my prediction.

Within 10 years, somebody, there's going to be, it's going to come back within 10 years.

That's the Hitler stash.

I think, yeah, we've been right for 80 years.

He killed it for 80.

I think he might kill it for roughly 85, 90.

But I will predict within the next five to 10 years, you will see it non-ironically.

It will start ironically.

It'll start subversively.

It'll start edgy, right?

And then, somehow, what's going to happen is it will probably be some alt-right figure

who decides I'm going to do this.

Somewhere in Brooklyn, it's like a virus.

It's going to mutate.

And it will mutate in Brooklyn into the hips.

Or cycle lefty.

And then we're often running.

And then we're often running.

And it's a generally accepted mustache.

Well, they probably think he's a freedom fighter anyways.

This is Gen Z people.

They don't know history.

Let's take quick break.

We'll be right back on Wilkane Country.

America leads the world in medicine development.

It matters.

We get new medicines first, nearly three years faster.

Five million Americans go to work because we make medicines here at home.

And not relying on other countries keeps us safe.

But China is racing to overtake us.

Will we let them?

Or will we choose to stay ahead?

When America leads, America cures.

Let's tell Washington to keep us in the lead.

Learn how at AmericaCures.com.

Pay for by Farma.

Are you stuck staring at your W2?

Our tax refund worry is holding you back.

You probably have FOMO.

The fear of messing up.

The fix?

Using turbo tax on into a credit karma.

They find every credit and deduction to help you get every refund dollar you deserve.

Or your money back.

It's time to overcome your fear of messing up.

And get your taxes done right.

Start filing today in the credit karma app.

Welcome back to Wilkane Country.

Yeah, yeah.

Let's go back to the Woolissa.

Uh, Texas girl says, will you invite Sidney Sweeney on your show?

Yes, Patrick.

Yes.

What the hell, man?

Oh, am I supposed to do that?

Yeah, Patrick.

Well, aren't you doing most of the booking?

Oh, yeah.

That's true.

You should do some more taxing.

I'm doing all the books.

Except for Lawrence Jones yesterday.

But yeah.

I bet you would come on.

Look at this.

Look at this one.

Sandra Gaddy Murphy says, will is going soft on illegals.

And soft on illegals is all in caps.

And I'm going to tell you what's throwing me off, Sandra, is the purple devil emoji afterwards?

Yeah.

Is the purple devil emoji mean they're tweaking me?

Is that being sarcastic?

It's just being sarcastic.

I don't know.

Yeah, I couldn't tell.

But I'm like, of all the people to accuse of going soft on a legal immigration.

Yeah.

It's like all over.

It's your thing.

I might be, do you think in at least mainstream media, which I remember of, I am the most hawkish?

Yes.

You're the most hard-lined on immigration.

And I wasn't always.

Yeah.

And I wasn't always that way.

And I wasn't always that way.

Yeah.

Oh, for sure.

Worse.

Or do you mean better?

No.

I was.

No, not better.

I think they're doing the devil emoji.

You're going to stop the end immigration.

That's true.

I think they're doing the devil emoji to be like, I like you will, but you're going soft,

like, ha, ha.

Like, I would like them to be after you, but I still like you.

I would like them to debate tomorrow next week with Lawrence.

Well, speaking of Lawrence Jones, yesterday we talked to Lawrence Jones about black people

versus white people nicknames.

Yes.

And Lawrence contended.

Lawrence's argument was nonsensical.

He said white people develop arbitrary nicknames that don't make sense.

Like, I think he tried to argue that Billy is a standalone name and not a nickname for William.

Was that what he was arguing?

Yes.

What he was arguing.

And he was arguing that like, Jack, and this one is the hardest one for me to accept,

but Jack shouldn't be a nickname for John.

And by the way, Jack has, I think Jack is actually like the Hitler mustache.

It's mutated.

Like, I don't, I think most jacks you meet aren't actually Johns.

But back in the day, all jacks were Johns.

The most insane thing.

Right.

I am Jack.

Actually, I'm John.

What?

I know.

No, it's the other way around.

I am John, but I go by Jack.

Yeah.

Yeah.

It's John F. Kennedy, Jack Kennedy.

You know, it's funny.

But he was a silly white person.

He was a distant cousin who I believe was John Birch.

And he went by Jack because of the confusion over the John Birch society.

John Birch society.

Yeah.

Didn't want to play in that.

Yeah.

I mean, I don't know.

Bobby, Robert.

This is what this is.

This is a thing that's developed over time.

Thousands of years.

And in Lawrence Jones, Larry Jones, doesn't just get stuck in and say, you know, what do

you do in white people?

Like, these are, these names wouldn't exist.

It's not like there was a bunch of billies running around and one day goes, somebody goes,

you know, Billy, you should really adopt a more formal version of your name, William.

It was the other way around.

His name was William and somebody goes, he's too little, let's call him Billy.

And they all did start probably as child versions of the name.

And then over time, what we've accepted is that the child version became okay to be as an adult.

But I imagine in, what do you think, 1880, you know, my son's Charlie.

He wouldn't be Charlie.

Well, Billy the kid.

At some point, at some point as an adult, he would transition into being Charles, right?

But he'll be Charlie his whole life, I think.

He'll be Charlie his whole life.

And that's, that's not a thing they did back then.

I wanted to re-brand.

They transitioned into the full night.

Or Scooter.

I wanted to re-brand from Dan to Daniel when I got older because I thought Daniel was more

affiant, but I didn't kept Dan.

Yeah, you're Dan.

I was Danny when I was a kid.

Oh, you ever Danny?

Yeah, when I was a kid.

You are?

Yeah, then I grew up.

Yeah.

I became a teenager.

Then I was Dan.

I was like, you know what?

I should become Daniel just to full circle it, you know, full evolution.

You know, I know you didn't want to say this earlier.

Did you start calling yourself?

Hold on, did you start calling yourself Dan?

Yeah.

Everybody was calling you Danny and you were like, no, it's Dan now.

Yeah.

Did you do that?

Yeah, yeah.

I started running with everything.

I rode it on all my like everything.

And then when like sports, like when I played baseball and basketball, it was like make sure

you put Dan, not Danny.

Do some of your friends still call you Danny and you're like, come on guys, it's not Danny

anymore?

No, they call me OV.

Yeah, you're old friends.

You're old old friends.

Um.

Why were you a hockey guy?

OV?

That's a hockey thing to do.

H-O-V?

Yeah, overlocked.

OV.

You didn't exist back then.

OV.

I'm just saying like the some people's last name become everybody in hockey.

This is such a hockey thing to add that E to everything, right?

And it's usually off the last.

No, it's a hockey thing.

No, it's not.

It's particularly hockey.

Yeah.

They call me OV.

Over OV.

OV Trace.

You know, it wasn't a name.

Patrick, it's particularly hockey.

Like if I had played hockey, I'll bet you.

The coach would call me Cainy or something like that.

Right?

Something like that.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah, be Cainy.

They would.

They'd call you Hattie.

Hattie.

Yeah.

Hattie, yeah.

Hattie's a good one.

Like a hat trick.

Oh, yeah.

Um.

Exactly.

And I call you tricky.

I was supposed to say.

Were you ever Pat?

Were you ever Pat?

No.

No.

I was very shy.

When I started playing hockey, they said, my first name is Roy.

And so they're like, what do you go by?

And I'm like, do you go by Roy?

Do you go by Patrick?

And I'm like, I don't know.

Patrick is your middle name, right?

They're like, what about RP?

And so they called me RP for like two years before I started correcting them.

But I never went by that.

My RP is your first name, Roy.

Yeah.

Your first name is Roy?

Mm-hmm.

Oh, you're like me.

I'm the only one.

I gotta go.

I gotta start doing that.

Maybe you're more Southern than I give you credit for.

I'm extremely Southern.

Um.

All right.

So back to the nicknames in Lawrence Jones.

We told Lawrence yesterday, this white people versus black people nickname thing is great.

There's actually a comedy bit about this.

And Daniel and grabbed it.

And this is it.

This is you have it, right Dan?

Yeah, yeah.

Yeah.

We'll play it.

We try to be funny with nicknames.

We call it big people nicknames like Tiny.

It's Sleel.

We need names.

People have the food.

I know a cornbread, a pork chop, and a collard green.

I know this one dude.

His nickname is boss.

And he ain't got no job.

I'm like, who you to boss up?

You'll sell.

But I think white dudes have the coolest nicknames.

I really do.

Because white dudes nicknames go with them their entire life.

Yeah.

White dudes have nicknames like Rusty?

Skip.

Chip.

Like your nickname could be Chip.

You could be the CEO of a bank.

You could have Chip on your business cards.

The brothers can't do that.

Puke can't be a branch manager.

Had to bang.

You don't trust your money with Puke.

Well, I write this way.

Dr. Jumberg will see you.

I'm like, no, he will not.

But what you're not going to do is hand me the rule

of the Dr. Jumberg, that's it.

I sent that to Lawrence by the way yesterday.

He said, no, that's funny.

That's so good.

Mike Goodwin.

We got to get, we got to get, Mike Goodwin is the community

in there.

We got to get Lawrence straightened out on his nicknames.

Meanwhile, back to the militia.

John Androssick, five for fighting, says Will,

are you pro or anti fighting in hockey?

I am for sure, pro fighting in hockey.

It's so great.

Do you think, what do you think about the fights in hockey?

Are they too neutered, meaning they're not very vicious

to be honest in the end?

They're a couple of punch because you go to the ground.

Somebody slips and once it goes to the ground, it's over.

And I don't think they should be doing Jiu-Jitsu on the ground

with their skates.

But the whole thing about fighting being brutal and all that,

it actually isn't that brutal.

The worst case scenario is probably that you take two punches.

Do you think?

It is.

Grab the way better.

In the 90s.

You had guys who were dedicated fighters like Bob Probert

and they would beat the hell out of you.

I mean, you'd be all bloodied up.

And I feel like, you know, I want to get the people

who were anti fighting out of the hockey fandom.

Well, those people need to go away.

What they do is they grab each other now,

but they push each other further away so they don't get hit.

Back in the day, they used to pull you so you could hit.

You know what I'm saying?

So now it's like a push so they don't want to get hit.

They used to pull you in so they could hit you.

That's the difference.

That's what I'm saying.

Well, I think also a lot of guys took pride

in not going down back in the day.

So you could literally stand there and trade punches.

And now, look, I'm not saying there was this.

You don't want to get hurt.

You want to keep playing hockey.

So I use a little more willingness to go to the ground

thus ending the fight.

A little more.

Don't you think that's fair?

Yeah.

Yeah.

It's a lot more than it was.

There's no enforcers anymore.

You know what I mean?

Yeah.

The team used to have a guy on the fourth line whose job it was

just to beat people up.

And now it's like, you know, that guy gets smoked now.

Yeah.

You have to be a registered one.

Rampy.

Yeah, but he can skate still.

Yeah, but that guy can't.

I was going to say those guys can't skate.

They get smoked now with everybody being so fast and skilled.

Right.

That's true.

Over in the list of Elise Winters says,

Will, what would you do if you weren't on TV anymore?

You've already done a lot.

Went to Montana, wrote a book.

ESPN Now Fox.

What would be next?

I do want to write.

That's on my mind.

Like, you've got to, I want to write something.

I really, really do.

And I'm suffering from paralysis by analysis.

I really am.

But, yeah.

And I think that what I want to write,

I've got a couple of nonfiction ideas now.

And it's going to go back to this lady saying I'm soft on immigration.

There's something around you.

What if I write a nonfiction?

No, listen to me.

You guys know this probably.

I started thinking about what I always get impassioned about.

History.

Home.

Oh.

I am impassioned by the concept of home.

What does that mean?

Soft.

What does it mean for a people to be tied to a place?

And what it means spiritually to be home?

And what it means when your home no longer becomes your home?

And I think there's something there.

I really do.

I think on the interpersonal level, I think on the societal level,

I think on the cultural level, there's just something to this concept of home.

But the truth is, I want to write either a narrative nonfiction or a fiction story, mostly.

That sounds like a good Netflix stuff.

You know, I mean, by narrative nonfiction.

Home.

Yeah.

You're not clicking on that.

I am.

And I just got a picture of a dude invading a home.

Yeah.

I don't know.

There's still something on the whole like history, narrative nonfiction, James Missionor,

American West.

Yeah, would that be a part of history?

And I'm interested in do.

I think so.

Yeah.

I do think so.

I've told you guys about this.

I just think the problem is, if you want to actually sell a book, there's a reason everybody writes books about Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy and George Washington.

It's because everybody can get in on it.

Yeah.

You know, I've got a book on Kit Carson that I don't know how well it sold by Hampton Sides.

I just, I don't know.

I don't know.

Many people can get in on blood and thunder about Kit Carson.

All right.

Patrick, before we go, you had a couple other stories real quick.

Do you want to stay in the world of hockey where you're really fired up?

It was fantastic.

Fantastic predators.

Go ahead.

This is trending everywhere because it's not, this is not a morality judgment here.

Okay.

But it's just like they didn't really think this one through.

So yesterday, that's, that's, that's next, that's next.

The first, the other ones, the first one.

So, so the natural predators yesterday had a pride night where they were pride jerseys and they come out, they taped their sticks and rainbow colors.

The problem is they didn't really think it through that their team name is the predators.

Yeah.

Took me a minute to get that one.

Okay.

And so people are calling them the gay predators.

You know, like it's, it's just a marketing faux pas, if you will.

It's just not.

Well, can I ask you a question?

Yeah.

Why are they, I don't, here's something I don't understand.

It's March 26th when this happens.

Yes.

Why is that pride night?

I thought pride was in June.

I know.

I thought we were still going for it.

I thought we were still going for it.

Yeah.

I guess.

I just don't understand, like, do they just now pick random nights to say we're doing this tonight?

Because the whole, what I'm getting at is the pride thing.

It seems to have escaped its confines.

It's all the time.

You know, like, do they do black history night in a random April?

Yeah.

Or, you know, that's only in February.

But pride gets to move around and get a ton of dates throughout the year.

A ton of reactionary too.

Like, if something happens, they'll be like, yeah, we need a pride night.

And a lot of teams are actually backing off of these.

Like, because they're, they're like, we're focusing on, you know, too much on,

on sexuality and all this kind of stuff.

Even in the month of June, like more and more corporations, it used to be like every corporation in June.

Right.

Which switch over.

And then July 1st comes around and it's like, oh, you know, we're back to where we were.

I want to send those boardrooms when they decide what nights should be what.

Did any players, did any players decline to do this?

For nice.

I do not see that.

They, they have in the past.

I know, I know speaking of OV, Alexander Ovechkin did not do it during the capitals pride night a few months back.

You always see this in European soccer.

They do this all the time.

And there's going to be some player.

It's actually usually a Muslim player.

It's like not doing it.

You know, and it becomes a whole deal.

A whole huge deal.

Now the another great part about this.

Go ahead.

That.

Yeah.

They played the devils and lost to them.

So on pride night, they lost to the devils.

Okay.

It's kind of.

I don't know.

Just kind of a little funny.

So are they just warm up because I didn't they ban this in 2023, 2024?

Yeah, they're all it's all warm up stuff.

It's not.

You can't have like the pride stuff while you're playing a game.

It's like warm up stuff.

Oh, really?

Yeah, it's not.

It's not for the actual game.

They banned it in 23.

They had big ol' lollipop candy cane sticks during warm ups.

Rainbow sticks.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Love that was something.

Love dolls.

Yeah.

Right.

All right, boys.

That's going to do it for us today here on the Friday edition of Will Kane Country.

I always appreciate you guys hanging out and being with us.

Make sure you hang out with us next time by following us to Spotify or Apple.

And we will see you again next time.

Listen ad free with a Fox News podcast plus subscription on Apple podcast.

And Amazon Prime members, you can listen to this show ad free on the Amazon Music app.