Jack Heart's Conversations from the porch - Episode 61

NOTE: The audio is a little iffy on this one as I didn’t get my microphone adjusted correctly before the recording. - Phil

Why would Army be interested? – Remote Viewing program

Gateway Experience – All about using tapes to develop capability. started with a single book about OBE Uses direct suggestions, subliminal binaural beats, and brainwaves all to get the listener to experience the depth of conscious experience.

Science is Ready for Consciousness: Federico Faggin

My biggest takeaway is that the external world, reality and mass, are a reflection of the conscious so consciousness can see itself, as in a mirror.

Science, especially physics, are always evolving, nothing is settled. As we develop new repeatable techniques of measuring waves humans will need to change the thought processes and explanations used to describe what the technique shows. This is evolution in science.

The gaps or incongruencies in quantum and classical physics are better described when the observer (consciousness) is part of the descriptive equations.

Meme of the show: Your reality is a reflection of your state of consciousness.

Mrs. Phil listened to a pastor who said the same as part of his sermon, your external world is a reflection of your “relationship to God”

Are virtual photons the elementary carriers of consciousness?

Author: Romijn, H.

Source: Journal of Consciousness Studies, Volume 9, Number 1, 1 January 2002, pp. 61-81(21)

Publisher: Imprint Academic

Based on neurobiological data, modern concepts of self-organization and a careful rationale, the hypothesis is put forward that the fleeting, highly ordered patterns of electric and/or magnetic fields, generated by assemblies of dendritic trees of specialized neuronal networks, should be thought of as the end-product of chaotic, dynamically governed self-organization. Such patterns encode for subjective (conscious) experiences such as pain and pleasure, or perceiving colours. Because by quantum mechanical definition virtual photons are the theoretical constituents of electric and magnetic fields, the former hypothesis can be re-formulated as follows: it is the highly ordered patterns of virtual photons that encode for subjective (conscious) experiences. Arguments are then given that consciousness did not emerge during evolution only after neuronal networks had been formed able to generate electric and/or magnetic fields of sufficient complexity but, rather, that subjectivity already existed in a very elementary form as a fundamental property of the omnipresent virtual photons, i.e., of matter. The contribution of neuronal networks to consciousness was to generate highly ordered patterns of germs of subjectivity (virtual photons), so allowing complex subjective (conscious) experiences. Due to the omnipresence of virtual photons, it follows finally that the whole universe must be imbued with subjectivity. An experimental strategy is proposed to test the hypothesis.

Billions of sensory external inputs at any given time. Brain mapping shows that there is a speed limit of processing these that is way below the number of inputs.

Lots of stuff out there on this subject.

Using the techniques

Energy – drawn from gateway when opened through matching gateway signal waveform in the brain

Focus – with gateway open, and intent focused upon outcome, energy is shaped into matter by matching the frequencies of the imagined outcome to the gateway output energies

Creation/Effect – Check for desired outcome and refine focus

Universe, either total toroidal or fractal (hologram) are just a bunch of rules setup by consciousness to be able to experience itself.

Consciousness is not required to stay within the holo-universe or fractal, travel beyond is available.

This consciousness creates the universe subject is a fairly well covered topic on the net. – Phil Hunter

The study is from 1983. It was declassified in 2003. Pages 18 and 17 exchange positions and page 25 is completely missing: ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF GATEWAY PROCESS

Missing Page 25:

Absolute as the model around which the evolution of time-space revolves to ultimately attain a reflection of and union with Him. That thought model, which perfectly reflects the essence or “spirit” of the Absolute fits the Christian metaphysical description of the Holy Spirit. Finally, our description of the universal hologram, the Torus of creation and evolution is neither new nor original. Its use as the figure of the universe, of creation developing in evolution is found in various stylized representations in virtually every religious system of antiquity, whether of eastern or western derivation. Whether it’s the stylized labyrinth once popular in the Hellenic world, the spiralized version of the Hebrew Tree of Life or its Hindu counterpart, or the Chinese Spiral Through The Fourfold Powers, the ultimate meaning is the same. Mystics the world over, it seems, have perceived the universal hologram in the same spiral form and have incorporated that intuitive knowledge in their religious writings from antiquity to the present.

* Left Brain Limitations. Twentieth Century physics would seem to be revisiting insights belonging to mankind as far back as written records can take us.’ The only difference is that Twentieth Century physics is using a left brain, linear, quantitative style of reasoning to approach the same knowledge which the mystics of old apparently acquired in a holistic, intuitional, right brain style. As a tool in the hands of our left-brain culture. Gateway would seem to be a promising method for achieving the intuitive, holistic type of interface with the universal hologram needed to provide the context that thinkers like Einstein have sought in their labors to discover a unified field theory in physics. For persons in our profession whose concerns revolve around strategic issues, tactical questions and matters of managerial form and system, access to a new world of intuitive perception and self-reflection would seem to offer, in the long term, the means by which to know in a truly objective way. This is so because the self-imposed limitations to balanced perception and objective logic which our cultural and personal psychological subjectivity imposes when we use the strictly left-brain thinking style could be offset by the holistic form of perception associated with altered states of consciousness. To the extent that we come to perceive ourselves fully in the context, of that portion of the universal hologram which is the reflection of ourselves, to that extent we release ourselves from the prison of subjectivity.36. Self-Knowledge. It was axiomatic to the mystic philosophers of old that the first step in personal maturity could be expressed in the aphorism: “Know thyself.” To them, the education of a man undertook, as its primary step, achievement of an introverted focus so that he learned what was in himself before attempting to approach the outside world. They rightly assumed that he could not effectively evaluate and cope with the world until he fully understood his personal psychological balance. The insights being provided by Twentieth Century psychology in this context through the use of various kinds of personality testing seem to be a revalidation of this ancient intuition. But no personality test, or series of tests, will ever replace the depth and fullness of the perception of self which can be achieved when the mind alters its state of consciousness sufficiently to perceive the very hologram of itself which it has projected into the universe in its proper context as part of the universal hologram in a totally holistic and intuitional way. This would seem to be one of the real promise of the Gateway Experience from the standpoint of its ability to provide a portal through which, based on months if not years of practice, the individual may pass in his search to find self, personal effectuality, and truth in the larger sense.

Links to Gateway Experience

Full Gateway Document: https://archive.org/details/1983-analysis-of-gateway-process/1983%20Analysis%20and%20Assessment%20of%20Gateway%20Process/page/24/mode/2up

Introduction Letter to Gateway: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001700270006-0.pdf

Gateway Manual (Basic): https://ia803400.us.archive.org/16/items/the-gateway-experience-manual/The%20Gateway%20Experience%20Manual.pdf

Gateway Intermediate Workbook: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210023-7.pdf

The Gateway Tapes Start Here: https://archive.org/details/gateway-experience-wave-1-track-1-orientation-the-gateway-tapes-no-ads/Gateway+Experience+Wave+1+Track+1+-+Orientation+THE+GATEWAY+TAPES+(NO+ADS).mp3

The Toroidal Universe was first proposed by Arthur M. Young back in the late fifties. (1) Young, philosopher, author and inventor of the Bell Helicopter,” was an occasional stand in as ringmaster for Andrija (Henry) K. Puharich at his estate at 87 Hawkes Avenue in Ossining, New York.” Puharich was driving force behind MK Ultra almost from its inception. (2) The Puharich estate burned to the ground in 1978 under suspicious circumstances. Prior to that, known to those that knew it as the Turkey Farm, it had been the site of some of the strangest experiments in the West during the twentieth century, many involving children. “In Hudson Hawk, the 1991 mega-budget flop about Alchemy, Secret Societies, the CIA and the Vatican, actor Bruce Willis who plays Hudson Hawk is asked where he got his tattoo of a Hawk from. He answers, “in Ossining, New York…” (3) Hudson Hawk is what the locals call the cold wind that blows down the Hudson River. Bell Laboratories was also closely affiliated with Puharich through the fifty-six patents he held on devices he’d invented spanning the gamut from medical electronics to neurophysiology, to biocybernetics, many with the stated purpose of being hearing aids for the deaf…

Ma Bell is just a colloquial term, an attempt to humanize a conglomerate that monopolized communications, particularly in America, from the nineteenth century till 1982 when Bell Systems finally agreed to break itself up rather than lose the anti-trust case the Department of Justice had filed against it in 1974. The Bell System Divestiture became effective in 1984, wherein Bell would lose control of the local telephone service in the United States and Canada, but keep its long distance service and retain control of Western Electric along with half of Bell Labs. There were actually four major American Telephone & Telegraph (AT&T) companies comprising Bell Systems.

Bell Operating Companies (BOC) provided local exchange telephone services. Upon the effective date of the Bell System Divestiture, January 1, 1984, they were split into seven independent Regional Bell Operating Companies, henceforth to be known as Baby Bells.

Before that, the Western Electric Company was responsible for all devices connected to the AT&T network. All phones connected to it, household and otherwise, had to be leased from BOC’s. Telephones not supplied by the Bell subsidiaries had to first be transferred to the local BOC who leased the phone back to the customer for a monthly charge in addition to a re-wiring fee.

Western Electric deployed a small army of inspectors checking household voltage levels to determine if non-leased phones were being used by consumers. Western Electric was known for being run with military precision and until this day its heyday remains the gold standard to which corporate management aspires. The American Telephone & Telegraph Long Line Company installed and maintained all wire, cable and the microwave radio relays necessary to provide long distance service to customers. Those are their wires prominently featured in Twin Peaks the Return.

Nuclear hyperbole aside, the transistor was the most important invention of the twentieth century. That scientists working out of Bell Laboratories were given the Nobel Prize for inventing it, even though it was invented by Nazi scientists who migrated to America under Operation Paperclip to supposedly work for Bell, is indicative of Bell’s status as the cutting edge of science in the post-WW II western world.

By the seventies, Bell had established a “worldwide network of scientists, industrialists, writers and philosophers at the cutting edge of new developments in physics, parapsychology, psychology and other fields.” The network was composed of three hundred and fifty experts from twenty countries. Bell’s “network was the subject of a study by the Diebold Corporation in 1978, with the grandiose and somewhat impenetrable title of The Emergence of Personal Communication Networks Among People Sharing the New Values and Their Possible Use in Sensitizing Operating Management, which compared it to the ‘Invisible College’ of seventeenth-century Britain,” now known as the Royale Society… (4)

If anybody knew just what was really in Ma Bell’s lingerie draw it was Arthur Young. He was arguably Bell’s best scientist; they employed so many great ones. But he was certainly their most visionary. Many other scientists looked up to him as their spiritual guide and guru.

Guys like Puharich and Jon von Neumann worked for no one. They had their own agendas, and the corporate oligarchy of the West literally threw money at them to stay in their loop. Young was not in that league. Outside of the scientists coming out of Germany from Operation Paperclip nobody was. Young had to go to Bell to finance his helicopter project. They didn’t come to him. But what Young had that von Neumann, Puharich and others like them seemed to lack was a strong moral compass. In his later years he would remark “it’s the erosion that science has made in our moral fiber that I’m trying to combat.” (5)

To Young, everything had a purpose and value and to know them was as essential to understanding the universe as knowledge of time and space. He ridiculed scientists who believed that, because man is a biological machine, his automated state implied that he had no purpose. By their very nature, all machines have a purpose. After he perfected the helicopter Young set about working out a “systematic theory of process, a theory that includes purpose or first cause as a formal ingredient.” (6)

“Young’s theory of process began when he was an undergraduate in the mathematics department at Princeton.” He would leave Princeton in 1927 two years before von Neumann got there. But he already shared von Neumann’s distaste for the Theory of Relativity and a determinate universe, if not for Einstein himself. “Thirty years later he developed his toroidal or donut-shaped model of the universe, a model which is only now coming into favor to explain problems in fundamental physics.” (7)

In Young’s own words “the theory of relativity describes the universe in terms of space-time and events, events distributed in space-time. You could think of them like dots on a Christmas tree or dots in space. Only the space includes not just three dimensions but the dimension of time. Events in the future are listed as well as events now. So the whole thing becomes a rather static picture, but to me I’ve been through a very drastic personal experience in 1927 and time could not be represented as structured. Time carried surprise, carried the unexpected. The direction of time was essential. So this led to my calling of the theory of time structure, and then I assumed shifted to a theory of process, but at that time I didn’t have any concept of stages or finite number of stages or especially that the stages should have a distinct character. If structure can be represented, be this fear that everything there fixed in space-time, then this other dimension of folding in on itself which is supplied, which is supplied by the torus deals; with the possibility of change, this growingness. Because this growingness is not just a subsidence of an agitation that started with the big bang, it’s a growing from within that the universe does to itself. The universe creates creatures that can grow and move and eventually reflect on the nature of the universe.” (8)

In a lecture given during the eighties, after pointing out the mathematical problems presented by a spherical universe Young puts his globe prop away and tells his audience “I’m not responsible for that…” He then produces a large white artificial donut as a new prop, saying “but I have an alternative universe.” Young rotates the two-dimensional skin that is the surface of the three-dimensional donut horizontally and it can be seen that there is a black circle drawn on the white skin. As the circle emerges from the hole in the top of the donut, it is expanding; and when it enters the hole on the bottom of the donut it is contracting, “closing in on itself.” (9)

Young tells his audience, “in a way this is what’s already recognized by science in what’s known as the Einstein Eddington Hypersphere. But it’s only on the condition that the universe which we now have will eventually close back on itself. The concepts involved in the notion of black holes where you have all things going back into this hole and disappearing, let’s hope coming out the other side as a white hole. But see we have that concept contained here, that the white hole would be when its generating out, expanding. And the black hole when it’s going back in.” (10)

NeuroQuantology is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that synthesizes neuroscience with quantum physics. In a thesis published in the September 2017 issue, Dirk Meijer Emeritus Professor in Pharmacokinetics and Drug Targeting at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands and his co-writer Hans Geesink a credited expert in Mineral Nanotechnology postulate that consciousness resides in a “4th spatial dimension” outside of the brain and the three dimensions plus time that are apparent to man. Although phantasmagorical to human senses “ Its functional structure is adequately defined by the geometry of the torus, that is envisioned as a basic unit (operator) of space-time.” (11)

The authors also note in the Abstract that the brain itself appears to “be embedded in a holographic structured field that interacts with resonant sensitive structures in the various cell types in our body.” They propose that the neural system is a receiver, receiving frequencies from standing waves that resonate through the universe and interpreting them into the sensual world it exists in. It is this translation of “wave information into brain tissue, that thereby is instrumental in high-speed conscious and sub-conscious information processing” known to take place in the human mind but that neural science alone is unable to account for. (12)

The authors assert that “the nested torus in modeling fractal aspects of the cognitive process” is essential in gaining a full understanding of neurobiology. They cite among others Karl Pribram famed neuroscientist and the true father of the “fractal-holographic universe” as to why they “prefer to postulate a nested torus modality in modeling cognition.” In figure 3 illustrations of the universe, black holes, a galaxy, the earth’s magnetic field, plant geometry, photon geometry, electromagnetics, and DNA, are given as examples of “rotational geometry at all scales of reality.” Included is a graphic of a torus superimposed over the human body as the theoretical “nested toroidal geometry of the human body, heart and brain.” (13)

The Torus is the basic unit of time and space, the recursive fractal that is the smallest possible piece of the entire hologram. Every Torus is interconnected in a universal network with every other Torus and every Torus photon contains the information of the whole Torus universe. In fact every Torus can contract into a photon when it enters a black hole and expands into a universe when it is expelled from a white one. It is happening simultaneously and in perpetuity, providing the space in which consciousness floats, ever expanding and ever contracting…

In Minkowski Space, there is no time; “the concept of the “now”, the brief interval that divides the past from the future, is absent in all fundamental mathematical formulations, both in classical physics and in quantum physics.” As noted by Hermann Minkowski himself, the man who added the fourth dimension so his student’s theory of relativity would be mathematically feasible; “our actual universe, being all our moments, past, present and future, coexist, but we can’t directly see or experience that fact. We experience our moments serially, one after the other, such that only the present moment is what’s actual for us.” (14) – Excerpted and edited from A Teapot and the Toroidal Universe by Jack Heart and Orage – The Human: Jack Heart, Orage and Friends

Citations

Cover video: THE RETURN by Herr Orage

1 – Young, Arthur M. “Arthur M. Young: The Reflexive Universe (1981) – Documentary video by Arthur Bloch.” 4:52,YouTube. YouTube, 26 Apr. 2011. Web. 30 Oct. 2017. <

>.

2 – Heart, Jack and Orage . “MK Ultra – Cybernetic Mutation, Remote Controlled Slaves, Dragon Soldiers and a Zombie Empire; Paint it Blue.” The Human . 28 Jan 2016. Web. <https://jackheartblog.org/wp/2020/04/mk-ultra-cybernetic-mutation-remote/.html>.

3 – Heart, Jack, and Orage. “Shadow of Nemesis 5: Weird Scenes Inside the Goldmine.” Veterans Today. N.p., 24 Sept. 2015. Web. 30 Oct. 2017. <https://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/09/18/shadow-of-nemesis-5-weird-scenes-inside-the-goldmine/>.

4 – The Stargate Conspiracy: The Truth about Extraterrestrial life and the Mysteries of Ancient Egypt: Lynn Picknett, Clive Prince: The Unicorn – 362 – 363 (PDF). http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/stargate-

5- Arthur M Young. “Arthur M. Young: The Reflexive Universe (1981) – Documentary video by Arthur Bloch.”00:17.

6 – Ibid. 3:05 – 3:11.

7 – Ibid. 4:38 – 4:59.

8 – Ibid. 5:03-7:05.

9 – “Introduction to the Torus (0:27) — Arthur Young –.” YouTube, Tetragrammaton Man, 4 Oct. 2007, www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYEG60e7S54. (Since taken down by YouTube just like they took down Karl Pribram’s most important lecture on the Holonamic Brain when we wrote about it in Lucifer in the Temple of the Dog I.)

10 – Ibid.

11 – Meijer, Dirk K.F., and Hans J.H. Geesink. “Consciousness in the Universe is Scale Invariant and Implies an Event Horizon of the Human Brain.”NeuroQuantology, vol. 15, no. 3, Sept. 2017, pp. 41–48., 6- 1079 ART (prsinstitute.org).

12 – Ibid.

13 – Ibid.

14 – Ibid.

The empirical evidence is overwhelming that the human brain works in the exact same manner as a hologram. This is called the Holonomic brain theory by neuroscientists. Many just cannot accept its implications. But its founder Karl Pribram, who held professorships for ten years at Yale and thirty at Stanford, was the Albert Einstein of neuroscience…

Pribram died in the beginning of 2015 at the age of ninety-five after a long and distinguished career working side by side with such giants in science as BF Skinner, John von Neumann and David Bohm; arguably the most brilliant physicist that the Anglo-American empire produced during the twentieth century.

Bohm collaborated closely with Pribram in the formulation of the Holonomic brain theory, but his earlier radical communist political affiliations would have barred him from the inner sanctums of the Stanford Research Institute.

There at Menlo Park, in the womb of madness, Pribram would have had access to at least some of the classified material of Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ. Throughout the seventies Puthoff and Targ were weaponizing the paranormal for Americas Department of Defense. They were working in the outer limits of quantum entanglement. In fact, Pribram admits to consulting with both Puthoff and Targ about it before beginning his collaboration with Bohm… (1)

In the same interview, from years ago, Pribram explains that “when an input comes in through one of the senses to the brain, it has to then become encoded in some way so that there is a representation.” (2) Pribram calls these representations memory traces and says they have no localized point of origin in the brain. “If you hack away at the brain” in surgery “you would expect that whatever representational process there is and –call it a memory trace if you will– that it would really be impaired tremendously, that you would remove a memory,” like cutting off a piece of a picture. “It doesn’t work that way.”

Pribram –a highly skilled neurosurgeon– noted among other things for his experimental work at the Yerkes Primate Center, of which he became director, recounts that “when lesions occur in the brain there is never any particular memory trace that is removed.” Recalling from over a half century of experience he continues “you may remove something, like the way to retrieve, to get back out the memory. For instance, you might not be able to talk about it but you can still write a note and say what it is you mean.” (3)

But the overall method by which these memories are spread throughout the brain, enabling them to avoid damage from injury, has always been a mystery. Pribram explains that it was discovered in the late fifties that the input from the retina is organized in spots, then focused into lines in the cerebral cortex suggesting that the cerebral cortex is filled with cells that act as line detectors. These cells are sensitive to lines at multiple orientations and once you have lines you can create “circles, faces, stick figures, whatever” to formulate images. (4)

The idea that the cerebral cortex was interpreting interference patterns can be traced back to Germany in 1906. (5) Decades later, John Lashley, Pribram’s mentor at the Yerkes Primate Center, reached the same conclusion. Interference patterns can be seen in the water if you cast two stones in a pool. When the series of concentric waves generated by each of the stones clash the resulting confused ripples or wavelets are interference patterns.

In the interview Pribram asks “what might constitute those interference patterns in the brain” and “given interference patterns, how do you get an image out of that?” (6) He then answers his own questions saying both problems were solved when people started building holograms at the University of Michigan and at Stanford (around 1962). He qualifies that by saying “because a hologram is a photographic store of ripples, of interference patterns. Instead of pebbles on a pond, what you have is light beams hitting the film.” (7) The light then spreads in ripples over the surface of the film.

Pribram continues “Every light beam that hits does that and the neighboring ones do it and the neighboring ones and so you got every light beam, every part of a beam essentially spread over the entire surface. That’s why mathematically it’s called a spread function.” (8) In a hologram that spread function is translated into images and with every passing year in neuroscience, it becomes more and more apparent, Pribram uses the word “overwhelmingly,” (9) that the brain functions in the same manner.

Pribram goes on to say that “over the last thirty years or so more and more evidence has accumulated to suggest strongly that the cerebral cortex acts as a resonator. It resonates to the frequencies of energies that are being transduced by the receptors; it’s the frequencies of energies.” He emphasizes that this is not an epiphany. German scientists were talking about it in 1906… (10)

Holography works by using interference patterns to encode information about a three-dimensional object into what is, for all intents and purposes, a two dimensional light beam. The interference patterns can then be translated back into a three dimensional object. A tremendous amount of information can be stored and transferred this way. Another profoundly functional feature of the hologram and analogous to the non-locality of memory in the human brain, is that all information is stored throughout the entire hologram.

As long as a part of the hologram is big enough to contain the interference pattern, it can recreate the entire image stored in the hologram. Holographic technology is based on the Fourier transform; a type of integral transfer sometimes called an improper Riemann integral. The Fourier transform itself is a mathematical function originally used in the nineteenth century to show the transfer of heat between two systems. Fourier transforms are the foundation of Spectral Analysis in the late twentieth and early twenty-first century.

In a Fourier transform two graphs are created: one showing the frequency domain and the other the time domain. The differential is then mapped between the two domains and through various permutations of the equations a spread sheet is achieved of all the individual frequencies that constitute a function of time, what is defined as a signal…

Often it is easier to solve a problem in the time domain by working on it in the frequency domain. Afterwards transformation of the result can be made back to the time domain by reversing the equation, what is called an inverse Fourier transform. The entire signal can be filtered simply by changing the frequencies in the frequency domain…

A Fourier transform can, theoretically, be used to send a function of the three-dimensional continuum into a moving four-dimensional mass or vice a versa…

The father of the Holograph is 1971 Nobel Prize recipient Dennis Gabor, who right after WW II produced the math –called windowed Fourier transforms– necessary to make one. Gabor served in a Hungarian artillery unit during WW I and in the twenties was instrumental in the development of the electron microscope in Berlin. When the National Socialists came to power in 1933 Gabor, a Hungarian Jew that had converted to Lutheran, fled Germany to England. By the time Gabor worked with them, Fourier transforms had been infused with the genius of Bernhard Riemann, the nineteenth century German mathematician who broke the back of Euclidian geometry for good, making quantum physics and relativity possible. Following Riemann in the twentieth century was Erwin Schrödinger, the Austrian physicist whose wave equation would become one of the two pillars of quantum physics and the foundation of wave mechanics. David Hilbert, the German mathematician who taught most of the others and after whom Hilbert’s Space is named, and Werner Heisenberg the discoverer of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, the other pillar of quantum physics…

Gabor would have at least had access, if not worked directly with the legendary John von Neumann, Hilbert’s best pupil. Gabor and von Neumann were both Jews, native Hungarians and born to money, although von Neumann’s education under Hilbert had been paid for by the Rockefeller Foundation. Von Neumann was in fact titled nobility, besides being the man who named Hilbert’s Space in Hilbert’s honor. Von Neumann was perhaps the most brilliant mathematician who ever lived. He would leave Berlin upon concluding his tutelage under Hilbert and be in Princeton by the end of 1929…

At Princeton, von Neumann delighted in playing Prussian marching music so loud on his gramophone that Einstein, who was in an adjoining office, would have to ask the authorities to intervene. In vain, there was nothing Einstein or anyone else could do about it. Von Neumann wrote the textbook for Quantum mechanics; Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, or in English Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. His mathematical contributions to civilization could fill a library, but his real achievements remain classified till this day.

It is said that when von Neumann was dying of cancer, while under sedation he was surrounded by a Special Forces guard to insure he didn’t blurt out any of the empire’s secrets. Von Neumann would tell anyone who would listen, delighted in it, that he had mathematically proven Einstein wrong. Most academics, although they could not understand his math, believed him and still do… Although they are now fonder of the experimental results of John Stewart Bell for their Einstein bashing… (11)

Einstein had always insisted that there were hidden variables that when discovered would reconcile quantum physics, which is indeterminate, and relativity, which is determinate. In Einstein’s vision of the future there would be just one unified field of physical phenomena and that would be determinant. In physics, determinant means events transpire as a result of a mechanistic necessity and are therefore predictable. They follow laws. All physical phenomena should follow rules. But they don’t.

In Quantum physics, quantum entanglement is not the only enigma. There is the double slit experiment where an individual particle is fired through a slit and another through a different slit at a screen. What shows up on the screen is a wave interference pattern which could have only been made by waves passing through the slit…

There is the wave function collapse and quantum randomness in general. If the observer calculates the position of a “sub-atomic particle” in space they cannot calculate its momentum because the very act of locating it influences its trajectory. If they find its momentum, the act of their doing so prevents them from finding its position. That’s the short definition of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle. It’s all about predicting probabilities in a matrix, nothing is certain and the observer is part of the equation, anathema to ‘good science…’

Erwin Schrödinger, who won the Nobel Prize in 1933 for providing the equation that makes it all work, was more than just a scientist. A philosopher and poet at heart, he was a lifelong student of the Vedas and believed individual consciousness was a manifestation of the universal whole. Back then, Schrödinger described the prevailing interpretation of quantum physics, now called the Copenhagen interpretation, as making no distinction “between the state of a natural object and what I know about it, or perhaps better, what I can know about it if I go to some trouble. Actually — so they say — there is intrinsically only awareness, observation, measurement.” (12)

The Copenhagen interpretation is the prevailing school of thought in quantum physics to this very day. As George Berkeley, the father of Immaterialism and therefore the Copenhagen interpretation, said three hundred years ago; nothing can exist if there is nothing to see it, “esse est percipi,” to be is to be perceived.

After serving as an apprentice to the mysterious German scientist; Max Wien, heir of Friedrich Paschen’s late nineteenth century experimental research on hydrogen spectral lines in the infrared region, Schrödinger would begin publishing papers about atomic theory and the theory of spectra in the early twenties… He would publish his famous equation in 1926. In the twenty-first century, it’s still the tool mathematicians use to describe a wave function. In the Copenhagen interpretation the wave function is the most complete description that can be given to a physical system.

In Quantum mechanics, the Schrödinger equation predicts probability distributions from which results are drawn. A probability distribution is a mathematical description of a random phenomenon. There are no exact results and at the time Schrödinger is quoted as saying “I don’t like it, and I’m sorry I ever had anything to do with it.” (13) Einstein was livid. Not only was special relativity no longer feasible but perhaps relativity itself. As every school child knows he said, “God does not play dice with the universe!” Schrödinger worked closely with Einstein in the ensuing years, attempting to formulate a unified field theory and reconcile the whole mess into one determinant science, but by the end of the forties he had abandoned those efforts. In a 1952 lecture, he made the first documentable reference to what has become known as the multiverse, prefacing it by saying that what he was about to say might “seem lunatic.” (14)

Schrödinger went on to tell his perplexed audience that when his equations seem to be describing several different histories they are “not alternatives but all really happen simultaneously…” (15) Famously, in 1956 Schrödinger would refuse to speak about nuclear energy at an important lecture during the World Energy Conference, giving a philosophical lecture instead because he had become skeptical about the entire subject. He would cause a great deal of controversy in the physics community after that, abandoning the idea of particles altogether and adopting the wave-only theory also put forth by Hugh Everett III in his many-worlds interpretation of the multiverse.

In the many-worlds interpretation, the wave in the quantum state is the only thing that is real and under the appropriate conditions it will exhibit particle-like behavior. In Everett’s multiverse, everything that ever could have happened in the past did and every possibility spawns its own universe where that possibility did and does occur. After John von Neumann died prematurely of cancer in 1957 Hugh Everett III would become the Anglo-American empire’s go-to guy on Quantum physics…

Pilot Waves were first proposed by Einstein in an effort to explain the wave interference patterns produced by particles in cases like the double slit experiment. He had hoped that they could be explained deterministically if the particle were somehow guided by an electromagnetic field; “which would thus play the role of what he called a Führungsfeld or guiding field.” (16) The idea of a pilot wave was picked up and made mathematically feasible by Louis de Broglie in 1927, but with little support from a physics community now enamored by Heisenberg and the Copenhagen interpretation, it died a slow death from neglect.

De Broglie’s math was resurrected by David Bohm in 1952 and renamed Bohmian mechanics. Heisenberg, who had been “profoundly unsympathetic” (17) to the idea from its inception in the twenties wrote in 1955 that it was nothing more than an “exact repetition” of the Copenhagen interpretation “in a different language…” (18) Regardless of the value of “Bohmian mechanics” the rest of what David Bohm had to say about the holographic universe may be a summation of everything that was really learned by man in the twentieth century (outside of course all those in this account who had an above top secret clearance…).

Bohm said there were two worlds. The primary one he called the Implicate Order or the enfolded order. He said the enfolded order was “the ground out of which reality emerges.” (19) The other world, “reality,” the world of the human senses, the world where consciousness dwells, he called the Explicate Order or the unfolded order. “What we take for reality, Bohm argues, are surface phenomena, explicate forms that have temporarily unfolded out of an underlying implicate order. Within this deeper order forms are enfolded within each other so systems which may well be separated in the Explicate Order are contained within each other in the Implicate Order.” (20)

Superficially it would appear the two worlds are “dual forms related by an integral transfer” but the reality is the unfolded order cannot exist independent of the enfolded order. (21) Bohm, always a pariah to the powers that be because of his politics sometimes had his work classified before he could even finish it. In the Manhattan project, he was barred access to Los Alamos and was not allowed to write the thesis for his own scattering equations.

Einstein had always been his mentor, shielding him and preventing his ostracism from academia and Bohm had always worked closely with him in Einstein’s quest to save physics as he knew it. But by the end of the war, Bohm had come to the conclusion that quantum mechanics would never become a deterministic science. He stopped looking for deterministic mechanisms as the cause of quantum phenomena and set out to show that the events could be attributed to a far deeper underlying reality. – Excerpted and edited from: LUCIFER in the Temple of the Dog I by Jack Heart & Orage – The Human: Jack Heart, Orage and Friends

Citations

1 – “Karl Pribram ‘Holographic Brain’ New Dimensions 1:12:52.” Youtube. Insightfreeman, 5 Dec. 2012. Web. 15 Aug. 2016.

2 –Ibid. 23:34.

3 – Ibid. 23:52 – 25:04.

4 – Ibid. 30:58.

5 – Ibid. 37:07.

6 – Ibid. 38:47.

7 –Ibid. 39:18.

8 – Ibid. 39:50.

9 – Ibid. 49:15.

10 – Ibid. 51:12.

11 – Goldstein, Sheldon. “Bohmian Mechanics.” 2. The Impossibility of Hidden Variables … or the Inevitability of Nonlocality? Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 26 Oct. 2001. Web. 24 Aug. 2016. Substantive revision Mon Mar 4, 2013 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-bohm/

12 – Ibid. – 1. The Completeness of the Quantum Mechanical Description.

13 – “A Quantum Sampler.” Science. New York Times, 6 Dec. 2002. Web. 26 Aug. 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/26/science/a-quantum-sampler.html

14 –Deutsch, David. “The Beginning of infinity,” page 310.

15 – Ibid.

16 – Goldstein, Sheldon. “Bohmian Mechanics.” 3. History.

17 – Ibid.

18 – Ibid. 15. Objections and Responses

19 – Peat, David. “Non-Locality in Nature and Cognition.” Nature, Cognition And System II. Page 304, 1992. Web. 21 Aug. 2016: https://books.google.com/books?id=PgPoCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA304&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false.

20 – Ibid.

21 – Ibid.

This book is the reason I am the most censored writer on the internet. If I was you, if I could get it, I’d read it and find out why lest you have to do this all over again. Publication will be discontinued after we publish my next one, so you better try to get it now.

Those Who Would Arouse Leviathan by Jack Heart, Hardcover | Barnes & Noble® (barnesandnoble.com)

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jackheart.substack.com/subscribe