Patriot Power Hour #360

0:30You are now listening to the Patriot Power Hour, the newest show of the Prepper Broadcasting Network. This live episode features the situational awareness you need to practice self-reliance and independence, introducing your hosts, Ben, the Breaker of Baxter's, and Future Dan, the editor of FutureDanger.com. Well, it's Thursday night and we are live once again, Patriot Power Hour September 3rd, 2026. It's episode 360. Future Dan, we got quite the show today. I got a lot of talk about. We got the dashboard, of course, but you know, what's big on your mind right now? Where do you want to start tonight? You want to talk about the Republican midterm convention? I don't. Convention?

1:30No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, that's not really Future Power Hour. You want to talk about the murdering mother of Massachusetts? No, that's not true. No, no, no, I don't want to talk about that. That's not our show. It's not what we're doing here. Tell us what we're doing here, Ben. We're looking for danger on the horizon and we're trying to learn lessons from the past at the same time. And we're here on Prepper Broadcast and Network preparing, but also trying to prevent disaster down the line. We're not totally giving up to it though. So how about that? Yeah, but try to put a stop to it. Help prevent it. Yes, sir. Exactly. So we are focused on the news, but we do try to talk some big picture topics, a little philosophy here and there, but honestly, we got so much news going on right now. I don't know how much kind of, you know, philosophy we'll be talking about tonight. It's a lot more news, but here we go, man.

2:30How close to fundamental breakdown of society do you feel we are right now? How close until it all collapses? Way too close, in my opinion, in a few ways. The easy one is power outages. Our entire civilization is based on electricity and I just feel like the system is not very redundant. I hope I'm wrong. But number two is just all the social services, welfare, EBT cards, like even that people are starting to fray at the edges, right? If that got turned off or we just, you know, inflation starts hitting double digits for every single month to be a big problem. That's a sense of you feel we're closer than usual right now. Usual being the entire period of this show, 360. Yes, I would say 2017.

3:40I would say except for like the heart of COVID, I would say I felt more like things were fraying at the seams in March 2020. But other besides that, we're kind of at that high watermark or low watermark, however you want to say it. We'll see what's going on. We're watching some economic indicators that have me a little concern, certainly concerned with a lot of things on the dashboard here. So how far is that from everything breaking down? It's tough to really determine, but like I said, the EBT cards by themselves would cause a lot of rioting. That's why I live far away from that though. On the other hand, we didn't have rioting this summer. Well, it still feels like summer most places by a lot, right? September, but still heatwave in the country. But made it only through this summer, ahead of another federal election. First one in the entire period that Trump has been in power, either term where there wasn't rioting in the summer before the election.

4:44Millions and millions, possibly tens of millions, hundreds of millions. Do we know of funding and grants are not going out to all these NGOs and USAID and all that? I know a large portion of the funding for not riot, peaceful protests. It was cut off at the source now. Was that enough to prevent it from happening again? I don't know. But for my own inside information, on my own intelligence, let's say, man, all these funding partners and organizations that we're putting on, bro, let's just say straight out, pro Democrat anti conservative, like millions upon millions of dollars per year that have been documented on the show and otherwise. They are laying people off big time, massive amounts of internal strife and infighting,

5:49so they're fighting over scraps, et cetera, et cetera. So I like that. I like the fact that hopefully that results in less rioting, et cetera. It's not going to fix the problem at the source, but it's a good sign. Yeah. Well, we got a road on the edge of a cliff and we're squirving towards the edge here and there. I got the honest with you. I think your judgment how close we are to the edge isn't the same as mine. I think we've got a lot of important dangerous news to talk about in this Patriot Power R 360, but I'm not entirely convinced for that close to the edge. At least not tonight. Well, I would focus as I am the breaker of Mangsters on what's going on with Treasury rates and fixed in compons. If things continue at the rate they are for the next month or two, well, things may not fall apart.

6:49They, as we've said, may have a couple more opportunities to kick things down the road, but we've seen evidence that some of the banks do scheming as effective as it used to be to cover things up and kind of extend and pretend. Well, that's safer. That's safer. That's safer. Maybe. Until it's not though. It could all just fall apart overnight as well though. I mean, if you consider with 1929 black Monday, whatever all that, I mean, 50% of the population did not die because of that. So it's not like total collapse. But that is very likely still is. So what's your gauge of that, I guess? My gauge of that is future danger. Eat map dashboard every week. We take a look. See where we measure. The news today pairs to the past, at least decade. And with that, I invite you to run us through with a blitzkrieg tonight.

7:49September 3. Let's do it. 1000 may happen at episode 360 record diesel price is where we're starting. Yeah, gasoline's pretty high and has been stopped at about four bucks a gallon, but diesel keeps keeps on creeping up. So all time record diesel prices. We're seeing Florida housing market going into a meltdown, 20% plus loss and value at least paper value. Now that people are trying to sell. As well as other indicators at the markets going down there, global bond yield, soar to multi decade high. That's what I've been talking about, which means the price of the bond is going down. Remember yields up on down. So this goes in hand with the other article global bond route, the price being routed, gathers pace as inflation fears mount.

8:50And then there's another article just confirming the gas prices above $4 all of August. So the entire month of August $4 or higher setting a record. As economics. Let's move on to nature and health natural indicators. Heat indices over 110 degrees Fahrenheit forecast south Texas here in early September. El Nino prompts drought alerts in El Salvador and Honduras as well as Panama, which is declared a national emergency. 6.3 earthquake in Alaska, Nikoliski. Seems Russian. The flood in Nepal, the boat Koshi flood that toll above 675.

9:51And even here in the United States, more than a dozen people missing from a Grand Canyon flash flood. So always try to prepare where you can, but sometimes not much you could do. Under pestilence befalls, there's a musles outbreak 98 cases in Wisconsin. And Ebola outbreak, the Bunde Bugyo Ebola outbreak becomes the largest on record with 5,794 cases. And almost 2800 deaths. So almost exactly a 50% death rate for at least who they verified as a case. So largest on record and 50% death rate, not 1%, 2%, 5%, 50%.

10:54Southern big sir, there's a big fire and an out west, many more fires. They counted more than 51,000 wildfires this year, more than 8 million acres burned. And if you look at the 10 year average, so going back last 10 years, they were at 126% of the number of fires, so 26% above average in that percentage terms. And 165% for acres burned. So well above average at 126%, if you say 100% is the average, well above for number of fires, but for acres burned, 165%. So unusually, unusually large fires. All right, let's move on. We have Liberty Indicators, the first column.

11:56I have a bias against Liberty Indicators. I never start with the first column. I need to start doing that because it is the leftmost column. FBI probes service selling 153 million American drivers license, darn near half the drivers licenses, maybe more for all I know. So there for sale. Not even that expensive. 24 states to sue US Postal Service over mail-in ballot restrictions. The feds arrest a foreign national in California on voter fraud charges. Representative Massey names alleged Epstein co-conspirators on the House floor, part of the public record forever. Another act blue official pleads the fifth in a House probe of alleged foreign donations.

13:01Yeah, foreign donations too for sure on the rioting that we were talking about earlier. What? Elections in of itself being manipulated by foreign donations. And at the SHTF grade for the night of the Liberty Indicators, the most important and actually happened right now continues to be under the war unconstitutionally waged column after about a month of a tentative ceasefire, but did hold together for about a month. Well, that is ended. Iran and US have traded strikes. President Wayne limited strikes. Well, guess what? We're going to be looking at a car, an island quickly thereafter and did complete those strikes.

14:02So that continues about, I think we're up to six months, just past the six months now. Mark, let's move on to national security. And foreign and domestic. Another indicator we've just seen all summer long that's been at SHTF level the entire summer as well is foreign black ops suspected. A Chinese owned shipping company was collecting intel for Beijing had concealed equipment on ships. And we'll kind of data they can capture and all types of things they can do in all the harbors of the United States. American citizen who worked as an agent for the PRC sentenced to two years in prison.

15:05A widening purge as China asked for senior military commanders. We really watched that. There's even an entire indicator around that Chinese commanders mutiny. It's not SHTF grade. It's of a more for your information to see what kind of trends come down the line, but it's there right now. Certainly worth watching Italy seizes Russian tanker after Russian president threatened reverse action. NATO scrambling fighter jets. Norway seizes Russian ship. Warth Russia starts but also low grade topical news. For now always worth monitoring and building that infrastructure down the line. With that said, we got one more article.

16:08Excuse me. One more. We got a indicator. Mega police operations conducted. And the two headlines under there. DHS to launch voter fraud investigation. Surge. Just in time for election season. Next two months. And nearly 2200. That's a fair amount. 2200 illegal immigrants arrested in New York. Future day and that is the news blitz for September 3rd, 2026. Yeah, and our audience has heard us talk a few times about not all indicators are of equal weight, right? Some are more dangerous in and of themselves and others. So just because they're hitting. Create one black on red happening now. Doesn't mean that they alone have enough weight to be considered a complete crisis. It's when they all add up, right? When they all start to go black on red. We get a poly crisis brewing.

17:08This is a pretty normal distribution for the whole summer, to be honest. But what I thought I'd ask you is which headlines there are clearly the most dangerous in your mind because of the weight of the indicator, not just the grade that they're at the night. And the second part of that is, are there any there that you question like what's that got to do with that? Like why would that be dangerous? All right. Great questions. My first gut feeling or gut response war with Russia starts is the most dangerous because it just means total thermonuclear war for the world. So that's always one I don't want to see on here. Even if it's low grade as you say. Other ones that are like super dangerous that I no matter the grade, just seeing them

18:10at all make me worried. Elections are stolen is definitely part of that. I'd have to say just because they are they have been stolen. And even if they're able to rein that in somewhat, that just degrades the overall trust in the system, even myself hard for me to trust the system at this rate. And that is not good for your civilization if you know. But then on the other hand, do you really want to trust the people that it's not anyway. Point is, I don't know if your elections are at risk, that is a huge, liberty risk. So I can make an argument for a lot of these that they're super dangerous, whatever, but I feel like nuclear war with Russia and totally fraudulent elections slash, you know, destruction of democracy and the Bill of Rights in America. That's bad. I'd say that the mega police operations conducted would be maybe you'd question, well, why is

19:12that dangerous? Well, if you're favor of the mega police operation, then you tend to overlook it. But if you're adverse to the targeted targets of a mega police operation, it's dangerous, right? So right now it's illegal alien roundups, which I entirely support. But agencies that get big, get institutional knowledge, have a lot of lessons learned and you know, apply best practices in the future. All they got to do is switch to the organization at the targeting, the population at the targeting. And even if in this example, 75% of what will become ice veterans of these mega operations aren't there in the future under a different political power. The 25% that remained carry on that knowledge of how to conduct these ops.

20:14So that one's a little bit counter-tube and I want to jump into it. For the ones that are max danger, I absolutely agree that the war with Russia or the war with China when it shows up, those have weights that nearly no other. There's two economics, maybe. Like a complete stock market crash, right? So the federal government defaulting, that's the heavyweight in column three economics, federal government defaulting. Some of those columns have heavyweight kind of indicators. Like if that's happening actually now, it's absolutely, indisputably super dangerous for everybody involved. And Russia and Italy, or I should say, Italy and Norway, seizing Russian commercial ships, that's crossing a new line. And the Russians are going to do it to them. So I don't like that one bit. Norway sees this as a Russian ship over $4.2 billion by Ukraine.

21:18The damages. So they're finally, as you said, actually enforcing it. Have a feeling this was, yeah, this was going back to Crimea when Moscow annex Crimea in 2014. So now they're actually trying to enforce it or enforce it. Defect of seizing the ship. Dangerous for sure. And the other that's in the same column was Italy, seizing the Russian tanker. And that's EU Commandos board six Russians to shadow fleet tanker. So EU Commandos on a Russian tanker, that sounds pretty scary there a future day. Yeah, and Russia is going to be emboldened to do it to them. And Putin says much. They're going to wait. They're going to watch. They're going to look and then they're going to look for an opportunity. So that's low level warfare on the high seas is what that is. No one's getting killed by this yet. But it's and meanwhile, Ukraine, Russia, just massive ballistic missile bombardments.

22:25Almost everybody living in Ukraine is underground 90% of the time. You got that hellscape to remember that that's going on at the same time. And it's gone on almost four and a half more than four and a half years now. Holy cow from February 2022. And still going really hot September 2026. Wow. The one and really quick comment on the mega police operations conducted. I could certainly agree with that. I remember even talking about going back in the day, 10 plus years ago, writing article about FEMA camps and all the fun that surrounds FEMA camps and internal security force, DHS, Obama's force, right? And we didn't see that fully materialized by any means. But as you said, there wasn't a lot of funding of that.

23:27A lot of infrastructure that's being used now was invested back then in 10 years. And all it takes is switching the target from a legal immigrant to a patriot. There you go. So maybe it took a little longer than I expected. But that's something to keep in mind. So I just want to point that out for sure. Yeah, definitely. And you know, looking at the 2024 election when there was hurricanes in Florida and some FEMA officials were caught exchanging emails, pretty much telling them. So co-help any house with a Trump sign on it, right? You know, if more for that, my entire history and observations of FEMA is that they're never going to be FEMA camps because that agency doesn't have what it takes. It doesn't forget about resources. You can throw several trillion dollars in that agency. The way it's constituted, it can't affect much at all.

24:29And the 2005 arena, hurricane, what was expected of FEMA to be able to do is obviously over expected, right? Like it wasn't designed to be that way. If the state itself is collapsing, we don't have an organization called FEMA. It could go stand it up. That would be called the US Army. They could do it. In fact, they have to do every time it gets bad enough, right? But there's never going to be a FEMA camp. It might be a sign that says FEMA that can't be guarded by the US Army or it wouldn't exist. Right. The side might say FEMA for sure. Let's see. I don't know if I could throw away from that than never, right? I mean, from 2005 and all of the FEMA camp fear mongering and FEMA 18 wheelers caught loaded with guillotines that they were going to go heal populations like that all scare

25:31mongering, sort of like that legend and lore of the alt-right that I got exposed to after the financial crisis. And I said, well, wait a second. Let's see if that actually ever materializes, right? And that's the genesis of future danger. Sitting just absorbing that media and distilling each one of these things that this could happen, this could happen. I heard that's going to happen down into tangible, measurable indicators. And, you know, depending camps exposed, look for it. It's on the heat map. Way down in the blue inactive bone because it's never had a worthy headline to ever substantiate it. Only three articles in a decade. So there you go. Yeah. That's where you go. Super fast. The path to COVID concentration camps in America.

26:32Question mark. This was a New York State Assembly Bill that was being looked at. Mr. And then here's so that was January 2021 August 2025. Well, last year about this time. There's a Texas detention tent camp, $1.2 billion dollar army contract as you pointed out. But just the topical news. It wasn't the AP though. And then may of this year, large scale immigration detention hubs, the HS push forward with that. But yeah, the, I would say this for the. For some of the alt right conspiracy theories, there were definitely poison pills where they would put stuff in there on purpose to make it look stupid. For example, the guillotine or the particular pizza restaurant for pizza gate. Well, obviously we saw the entire process behind pizza gate was true. But all of this one particular restaurant, it was innocent. So therefore the entire conspiracy thrown out that was on purpose in my opinion.

27:34So that's what I would have to say about the guillotine. So. All right. We want to go next man. Probably need to talk about that diesel price need to talk about that oil war. The northern oil wars, of course, Russia and Ukraine, the southern oil wars. Us and Iran probably need to talk about that. All right, supply crunch. And I'm not going to go through my AI right this second, but I did update multiple AI models. I've put together over the last six plus months and they've confirmed that there's still, of course, serious ramifications from or moves closing. But the most important thing that I think is that the strategic petroleum reserve continues to tick down. And if it continues at the rate, it's been going the last couple months.

28:37It will be at the, let's just say legal limit. They're going to have to ask coagres if they could do, you know, or at least more. Now I'm sure they would be able to, but what really what I want to get to is oil prices is one part of it, but it doesn't have to do with the refinery aspect. Okay. So that's why we're seeing yeah, oil is high, gas is high. But diesel, there's some problems with the refinement number one, but number two, the demand is just still out the window in terms of very high for the diesel crack spread as they call it. So yes, usually what I've just gathered myself in the last few years, diesel is about a dollar higher than gas. I remember when it was a lot less than that, and almost the same prices gas at one point back in the day, but anyway, so let's just say gas is about four dollars a gallon. Well, diesel is five dollars and eighty cents a gallon. So that's almost two dollars more than gasoline.

29:41And of course, diesel is used for farming and trucking and blah, blah, blah. So point is, yeah, gas is high. Oil is high, but diesel is just going crazy right now, future day. Yeah, I'm just listening to this thinking about what the, I just think ahead about, did you name like maybe the top three things that, diesel is not an input, these prices and an input to the cost that people buy. The first thing off the top of my head is, you know, there's definitely been a, you know, back to the land, kind of organic food, big, big growth in that. It goes right hand in hand with make America healthy again, right, eating local. And so maybe food can still vast majority is going to get transported with diesel, 18 wheelers. I can't even think about the two other products would be on that list, can you? I don't think so. I don't think so.

30:43That's how central diesel is to the price of everything. Yeah, I really came up with a blank here. Maybe we're missing something, but even, yeah, so much. Diesel is used in that a minimum, the trucking part of it, but railroad, of course, too. So yeah, I don't think if anything, anything's coming from more than 10 miles away from you, it's going to require some diesel. If it's on a supply chain, supply chain, and you know, maybe you go to your local farmer's market or whatever, maybe they plan it by hand. If so, it's going to be so expensive anyway, it'd be cheaper to get the diesel factory fueled. Anyway, point is, yeah, inflation up, up, up, and it's not going to abate. In fact, Jackson's whole, the banksters and friends, they cannot, they cannot lower interest rates right now. In fact, some of them are voting to raise interest rates because inflation is looking so ugly, they need to raise interest rates.

31:45That's scary. Prove to me that it's not going down soon. The diesel's not going down soon or the high, you just said it wasn't, you just said diesel prices and coming down soon. Prove that to me. Stomach white say. Yeah. Well, I mean, I don't have the statistics on hand. I can build you the model for that, but why would you got approved to me the other side of the coin then? What would you say that would have it go lower anytime soon? I don't know what the price of any of that is going to be next week. So many things that could affect that. So your category is saying it's not coming down soon. I don't know if that's true. It might not. I mean, right. I'm getting right. I'm getting right. Seriously, good arguments. Why? It has a very low chance to come down soon, but not sure I could just go with, oh yeah,

32:46that's the way it's going to be. Well, I'd have to caveat everything I said if I was going to play that, but I get what you mean. Well, deals up 55% since the war in Iran, February 28th. So until 25% in the same time period, right? Exactly. If it ends soon as it ends and doesn't look like it's any time. Yeah, I don't know. I'm comfortable to invoke the Defense Production Act and federally seize the companies that aren't out putting it at lower prices, right? Bernie Sanders loves that idea. Seize the defense production. It was Chuck Schubert who suggested it to Trump during the COVID crisis. And that's how Honeywell and GE got told to make ventilators that they had no possible way of making with all offshore to China. That killed a bunch of people and was totally unnecessary. I didn't even heard about them delivering squat on ventilators.

33:49I'll just went away. But the same thing. Those laws since the Truman era, I just, you know, since the nuclear war, potential for Armageddon, you know, if it happened or got close to happening, clearly Congress gave President power to do that sort of thing. Well, the markets would generally agree with you because they are still damn near close to all time highs in the stock market at inflated values, though, of the inflated dollar. But regardless, still doing quite well. We're seeing interest rates go up, which is bad, but it hasn't like totally blown out of the water. They are able to sort of kind of control this. I just think at some point, though, the vibration in the transmission is going to just blow. I don't know what I'm looking at, though, of course. Gold silver, Bitcoin still showing high elevation, $4,500 gold, 67 silver. Bitcoin was up 6% today, 5% at 81,000, but they're not screaming superpanic, right?

34:56So things are holding together. I would say, yeah, the integrity of the financial system right now is a solid three and a half out of 10. So they may be able to keep it like that for a while. So would you like to revisit the UFC octagon bout metaphor we used to describe the US Iran conflict this summer? I think I got an update on that, that bout. Right. So it looks like to me. And last time we were talking about, the first round was just knockout punches on Iran and down to the mat. And then they're just the mosaic features of that theocracy prevented the collapse, right? The next two rounds this spring in this summer have seen Uncle Sam come out and just push around to the ground and put another choke on them, put another arm bar on them, wrap

36:01that in an elbow around somebody's trachea and just and Iran's just somehow able to hold its breath. But I mean, it's some point I don't think it can. I mean, economically, but Passant put out there, they're going after Chinese banking, they're shutting down banks in the Middle East that connected anyway with the Iranians. How long before the the Iranian regime has to just tap out? Hopefully soon and then we can go home and stop messing around there. But I mean, the Afghanis went at like quit, they never quit. They're just they'll go to they die and then their kids will go and they don't care. True enough about that part of the world, but you know, how long for the IRGC, you know, goes unpaid forever? Like you're just going to be in that military and not get paid.

37:02Like, where are you going to eat? It's a good point. Yeah, for every one, you know, a little bit of pain we have multiplied by 50 for them. Sure. So I think they're going to turn on each other. Well, the people are going to turn on them. And honestly, if this was within our control with clandestine operations, now's not a good time for this to end. Because there's a big swath of voters whose attention span could be, you know, looking entirely somewhere else in a matter of how bad this week was. Let me look at that something else next week. Maybe that's us. I don't know. Every single week the heat map dashboard is changing this summer and we're talking about this Thursday night. Not always looking back at last Thursday night. That's most voters now, right, with the velocity of information, right? So why choke out Iran in September when you might be able to it in late October?

38:07It's only a couple more months than, you know, it would be recoverable. But if we're looking at a one year anniversary and still messing around there and oil still at 100 plus. Diesel's at six plus. That'll really start to hurt. I'm just asking a question like as as information operation to sway the election. What about a complete, you know, a very obvious worldwide accepted capitulation from Iran, right before the election? Wouldn't that be ideal from the point of view of the president? If he has that power to pull that off in the few week window without it blown up in his face, like three days before the election, literally or figuratively, but that would take some precision, I think. I don't know if he's got that much control over it. Right. And it's in March when we bombed every radar and all of their surveillance systems, absolutely fractured the chain of command and, and, and, and, you know, could basically turn off

39:12Iran power, disabled electricity anywhere in their grid anytime we want. Now we haven't bothered to build the clandestine option necessary to do that. Like you think at their bombing is ending. Don't want to even thought of trying to build up a resistance over that government. What's, I mean, will it happen? I guess I got a couple of months to pull it off. Well, what's it? What's it? Building up that, that, that capability or that capability having an effect. You doubt that that, that, not just the United States, Israel and many other countries would have contributed clandestinely in funding, training, feeding information, doing, doing everything like, you know, like the, like the, like the, like the refrench in, in, in occupied France, helping an infrastructure get ready to oppose that regime. You kind of believe that's been part of the campaign all along.

40:13Yeah, I'm sure billions of dollars have been put on it for sure. Yeah. So is it going to work or do anything, especially in time for the election? I don't know. It's a little not going to come down. I don't know. But that's what we do this for is, you know, we'll get the potential trajectories and also understand things you go in different directions from here. And which combinations start to, you know, bring about the calamity that we focus on? And this network focuses on, right? The calamity that most people are preparing for. Speaking about the elections, 24 states to sue the post office, we talked some about this previously, but a new article from a couple days ago, when did election integrity become such a contentious issue in the US? This article starts with here on zero hedge. Yeah.

41:1424 states. That's about half of them. That's the quite the divide right there. Future dad, what's your thoughts on how this has been progressing in the last week, a couple weeks, we first talked about it and where do you think it's going to hit? But pretty straight, there'll be the hardest election ever to commit election fraud because the full weight and power and authority of federal police forces at least with military backing them up if, you know, civil unrest came about near the election. But for now, just the, you know, basically the FBI and the other federal law enforcement ICE contributing to voter rolls, never, never been an opportunity for a cleaner election in our lifetime. That's good sign. Well, they do anything with it is a question. Do you have all the mark it would 24 states be suing if they didn't? No, that's good in and of itself, no matter the result of the election for this, you know,

42:18for it happened, I guess, depending on it. But I mean more like even with the fair and clean elections, Republicans might be getting a whooping base off what Pauli Mark is saying. But maybe not, maybe the fair elections would actually tilt the favor so much. I don't know. What do you think there? I guess we'll find out a couple of months. No, this is going to be one of the hardest elections to call ever because of this change. Right. Good luck with that. It's tough enough to use old information and predict the future. But they got a change. How thing the rules are thanks every day. Good luck. Yeah, the Dinesh to Susan, you know, 2000 mules. Watch the movie. They're not going to do that, right? Even when they did do that, they barely won. And just write amounts in the districts that they had to, right? You know, there's the potential for that, especially with the, you know, federally seasoned

43:22control of how states mail out ballots long overdue. Well, on polymarket, Republican sweep is at 11% chance. Democrats sweep 51% and then the split house takes up the other one third or there about certain. I'm Republican Senate Democrat House. So that's what you can make money if you think it's going to be different than that. We don't really do that. Although we, we had meant to, but we never did. Well, polymarket is not legal in the US yet. All the Democrats states sued to stop it because they want to have their push poles. Their fake poles and I was listening to Bloomberg radio before the show. Democrat strategist talking about extra percentage of Republican strategist comes back and says, these polls are 20% off regularly now, right? They can't do what they really kind of perfected during the Clinton years and then into the Obama years is shaping a public opinion with polls that people hear, right?

44:28That's a good development. That's, you know, and that's why polymarket is sued. You can't use it in the US yet, but they certainly can't censor us from seeing what people who circumvent that or who are abroad, right? You know, where they're putting their money. 100% free market will show the truth. Doesn't mean it's always going to be true. I can always turn around the last second one way or the other, but I love the free market because it finds information. It can help you find the truth. If it's a truly free market, that's a whole nother thing though. But yeah, that said, if you today were at the 45 minute mark, we got at least another 15 minutes in us, maybe even maybe we could even go near the 90 minute mark. We got a lot of articles to hit on where you want to go next if you got a preference. Yes, fit through the remains. I think we talked about Russia, talked about elections, talked about diesel price.

45:28They were hit the big ones from our point of view. That's our point of view. The audience, you know, when we get down to the one Z's and one off's and, you know, sort of abstract, unrelated, you know, kind of indicators, to a lot of people, that might be the most important thing that they're worried about. That's that regional aspect as well as, you know, what matters. To use certain things could matter more or another. Let's run right into this then if we're going to pick up some of the miscellaneous, but I want to start with probably one of the more important miscellaneous and that's the act blue official. Please the fifth alleged foreign donations on America greatness. AM greatness.com. Congressional testimony Tuesday as House Republicans investigate allegations of fraud, foreign political donations, plead the fifth, Kimberly Peeler Allen, part of the board of directors

46:30of act blue. Hey, just because you plead the fifth doesn't mean you're guilty even though back in the day, the Democrats would say that exact thing. But I guess my point is, hey, if they don't put up a defense and the evidence is great, if they don't even defend themselves and say anything, the evidence is great. May justice be done. I want to done the proper way though. Future Dan. Why do you think this is dangerous or maybe not dangerous, maybe it's great news. What's going on with everyone pleading the fifth? The system was designed that way, I guess. Go for it. I really care about the Democrats working at act blue. That's the Chinese intelligence services that in all likelihood flooded, bulk of Obama's campaigns with tens of millions of dollars of microscopic donations. The question I got today is, what degree is the National Security Agency NSA under civilian

47:39political control right now? Does it have pockets of deep state that are actively thwarting the detection of those types of foreign cash injections that corrupt our elections? Because the technology logically, it's available. It can be seen. It takes people that are loyal to the Constitution and the laws that prohibit that behavior to detect it. It's going to be signals intelligence out of the NSA. Monitoring bank wires. Well, I'm hoping they get the white hats as they say or folks on the inside can either leak this stuff or at least preserve it for future prosecution and evidence. No, no. We need leaders there actively running operations to see it and report to the FBI and let the FBI go directly to where it's happening.

48:39It stopped it. Stop it cold in real time. White hats helping expose something on a conspiracy site ten years later, exclusive to Alex Jones whistleblower eight years after something terrible happened. I don't care. I don't care anymore. I want to stop now. I mean, I like that attitude, I suppose. We ain't seen anybody prosecuted right now though. It can't get too greedy. We're not seeing anybody prosecuted. Go to jail. I don't know. Maybe eventually, but at this point, I just want at least the record to show all this some future AI will have to be like, well, the proof is there. You want the Democrats to get punished for accepting the Ford bribes? Thus scaring that ideology from doing it again. Absolutely. The first opportunity they have when they control the White House, that's a great ideal.

49:42But I'm more about, you know, I don't want to see trials and convictions. I want to know later about espionage swaps where Chinese spies that were captured and held and returned for our ops in their country, which are obviously ongoing. That's what I want to hear about later because I want that to be classified now. I just want the Democrats to come to find out that a few days after, you know, basically losing a major election again, that they're all pointing fingers at each other because they didn't have any money and none of them can explain why this year they didn't have any money. It's because fucking China couldn't give it to them. That'd be nice. But Polymarket's saying Democrats sweep and then his game over for Trump. But I hope Polymarket's wrong. I ain't put my money in that context anyways. There's not going to be a sweep in either house. There's no parties can win every single, you know, steep.

50:42That doesn't make sense. No, not that kind of sweep. That's what. Majority on both. Well, okay, take the majority. I'm not the verb sweep. You know, implies you win an entire set of, you know, something. What? Sweep of seats that are in contention by, it's definition, right? Yeah, I mean, you're more precise on the language for sure, but I would say they, what the Polymarket's saying is there's a coin flip chance of Democrats take the House and send it. Trump's lame duck. And that's bad. But, hey, I guess we'll find out. That's it. Before I'm not sure that's bad. I think letting that party have power for two years is a perfectly safe way because they, you know, they won't have a big enough majority to enact anything, right? So you're probably going to veto anything they pass. So, you know, it'll be stalemate.

51:43System was sort of designed like that, but, you know, let's watch them rule for two years. Let's see what a kind of initiatives that party has with its B.S.A. in the House. That means I might be the best case scenario for Trump's party for retaining the White House for more years. I guess we're going with that, but they don't actually have to do anything. They just have to stop Trump and talk about how they're stopping Trump and that'll get half the country vote for them unfortunately. I know. I think them in power for two years doing that stuff would, would, now they get blamed, right? Now they're the complete out party, right? And every time one party has all, you know, all three parts of the popularly elected constitutional structure, House, Senate, and presidency, they don't hold it for long because there's independence that just blame the powers that be vote against the incumbents. Just throw the bombs out, kind of, you know, mindlessly throw the bombs out.

52:44Yeah, but there's not going to be a free election after this one if the debit grads would be the problem. We got one reprieve off of this and if they swandle it here, then good luck. You never get it. What was 2023? No, no. I mean, that's for sure. And it wasn't squandering it up front, but it's swandering it here. The unaccountable microdion donations that went into Obama's campaign in 2008, was that one tree? So look, if you had a 15% advantage, let's say they're 15% of was fraud, 35% Democrat, 65% Republican, but it got put about 50, 50 because of fraud. But now we're actually leveling it and it's even Stephen or maybe let's say not even Stephen, but close.

53:45But you still lose. That means you lost 15% of the voters just in the last four years, six years, eight years. So once the fraud gets put back in place in a few years, which it will, this is my whole premise. The fraud is coming back and is going to come back five times as much in the next decade. So if we don't stop it now, eh, yeah, ever taken the fraud out ever again. USAID will be five times bigger by the year 2050. I'm not as certain to you about any of that, but that's, that's an opinion. I respect your opinion. I don't, I don't share that the inevitability of some of these things you're talking about because when there's corruption, it, it, it, it rot from a certain dimension in people where the man with a used to pay, didn't matter what they didn't used to care about. It gets certain, certain point. It's undeniably recognizable and there's always, you know, besides, they're not going to cancel

54:47elections. That would be war. They all write war outright kinetic physical civil war. That's not happening. No, not literally canceling them, but just bringing back that 10 or 15% edge through new types of fraud and foreign influence and domestic influence, like version 2.0. I don't want that for sure. So definitely want to expose it ahead of time. Pretty much what got them on their heels, like if we go back to the UFC, like, you know, the political fight this time instead of Iran, got them on their heels, put them down really, but the fight ain't over and if they get back up, I don't know, they're going to be pretty pissed. So anyway, I don't know. I'd rather take them out and finish the fight right now instead of let them come back for the next rant, I guess. Yeah, but I'm not sure it ever finishes. There's always going to be true. You know, but you know, it's a, it's a dichotomy in our democracy, UK, Australia, you know, we don't have a parliamentary system with fractured, multi party politics.

55:51You know, it's come down to two sides, right? It's just keeping the most dangerous socialist one out of power is pretty much all I hope to do the rest of my life. There you go. All right, last analogy on this aspect, if you think of the spectrum from left to right on a line, I agree. We need, you know, the two party system is what it is has benefits and costs, but generally it's one of the best. But what we need to do is divide that line into thirds and the furthest left third pride needs to be thrown out. In fact, maybe a little bit of the very extreme right needs to be thrown out as well. So I'd like some of the centers to come together. Then we can split back into two. But yeah, the DSA people, they are not needed. We don't need them to be part of the two party. They're way too far. They are very dangerous. Of course, I don't want to prosecute them and put the IRS against them. Like they would do to me. That's the difference.

56:52They could become the Democrat party within four to six years. That could be mainstream Democrat. That's what's going to happen unless we like totally put them to exile politically and reform the party. Two parties, maybe one dies in another one forms blah, blah, blah. But I don't know. That's what I'm worried about is the DSA in eight years, 12 years, 16 years, especially there's a total economic collapse, 1929 or worse, great depression, 25% plus unemployment and or 10% plus inflation annualized for multiple years. So yeah, there you go. They'd have to have supermortuities. They'd never got to the point where they had supermortuities. They'd start amending the Constitution. They could start overriding vetoes of a Republican president that was put in to stop them. Right? They'd never got to the two thirds in both houses.

57:55But we haven't seen one party be able to break plus 2% in several elections. Right. That is a saving grace on both sides, especially the Democrat. But still, yeah, I'm not a fan of the Republican kids as I would say. All right. We talked a lot of politics today, but that's fine. There are a lot of elections, stolen type articles here. Where else you want to go? I know there's some miscellaneous, but were there any that really you got to get before the end of the night? Yeah, I'm looking at the wildfire news. And I got to remember the summer of 2020 seemed like worse in this summer. You just don't hear about the arson. So I guess that was all during the Minnesota riots, right? So true. This summer has been a lot safer in many degrees. In many ways, super hot summer, worldwide, right?

58:57And those fires outweathed our tinder boxes. So it's not surprisingly we're getting them, but you just don't hear about crazy antifog going into California fires and setting stuff on fire, you know, protest Trump. So still, still a lot of much better things happening this year than recent years. Some of it. All right. So what we're showing here on screen right now is the year, the number of fires and the number of acres. This is direct from government website, National Interagency Fire Center. And looking at it, my first thought is I'd like to see struck, you know, as a piece of data that's not here, number of structures destroyed and or property value destroyed, which can take a while to calculate. But my point is just because there's many more acres burned does not mean it was catastrophic

59:59destruction. On the other hand, just because a small, quote unquote small amount of acreage was burned doesn't mean it wasn't extremely costly. You know what I don't absolutely know if this is true, but when did it when in Maui and the Palisades fire happened? Was that in 2023 or maybe that was 24, but that's what I was talking about is the cost, the cost to civilization, the cost to everything. Now I don't want a bunch of forest fires burning down beautiful trees and squirrels, but that's what happens in nature. The forest clear themselves, especially if you don't manage it correctly, it actually does way more damage. So there's my soap box there. I will say though, the nominal numbers, it is 8,8.2 million acres in 2026 is the largest single number of the last 10 years. And you know, that's just a street facts based off this haven't sourced every piece of

1:01:00data, but it looks realistic. Yeah, it's just a lot safer when there isn't crazy political arson, you know, at the root cause of it. Want to ask about something that's not on the dashboard talked about the past. You know, AI CapEx converting into productivity games. What's your, what you're feeling about that in September of 2026? Hmm, I guess it really depends what tasks you're doing. So just so happy to have the test. I do my professional career are very AI friendly, but I'm hopeful, not easily replaceable for me. More like I operate the machinery, not that I get replaced by the machinery is more like what I look at it, but I very, you know, I'm information worker, whatever deal with all types of documentation and that takes hours to read, but an AI can read in a millisecond.

1:02:02So I'm on that end of the spectrum, obviously nurses or plumbers, people that operate in the real world, not me who operated the kind of the matrix of corporate world for the probably the way to say it. It may not affect them as much, they can still get good benefits out of it though, scheduling improvements. You know, think about, one thing I always think about is all the map apps that people have, people get lost less often. They, you know, could serve fuel because you're not taking a wrong turn to put you off 30 miles or blah, blah, blah. So I think everyone could benefit some from AI a lot more than others. The main question is, is corporate America going to share that with the world or only just keep it with their shareholders? Of course, they're going to keep it with the shareholders that's their fiduciary duty. So does that mean for every dollar productivity, they cut a dollar or labor?

1:03:04So a lot of people get laid off or maybe they'll just do a better work and keep the same labor force and just make things much better. I would like that. I don't know. But let's move back upstream though earlier than that. Because right now we're in the massive investment, all summer, massive investment. You know, accused of being circular investment, all kinds of novel derivative investment schemes that are considered risky. The AI bubble, right? Everybody's fearing an AI bubble. But it is a massive, like never before seen US investment in just the electrical grid, right? To support data centers, right? So the capital expenditure, the investment, when is it going to and how, I think you talk more about how you fear it's going to strike the economy? We're getting that again, I like to. But my bigger question is, you know, on the assumption that there's going to be poor

1:04:08productivity gains, when would you expect all that to land? It's definitely start beating in the numbers by now because a lot of Fortune 100 and Fortune 500 type companies, which is the majority of the insurance. But it's just the investment, right? It's just starting. The buildings haven't been built, right? Power grids haven't been built up. And wherever Chinese power is, I can convince people to be anti-datastat or they're trying, my God, they're trying. One of the most successful Chinese improvs right now is to try to back us away from that capital expenditure because they can't do it. They can't match that. They don't have the chips. They don't have the freedom. They don't have the real estate. They can't do that, right? It's the only choice they got is to try, you know, they can't stop the cat-packs. What they can do is, you know, try, like any good Democrat, try to block your permit,

1:05:10to build, right? You can't work. Wait to make communities that can just say, yeah, we'll take that infrastructure, build it here. We'll take the jobs. So it's not going to, it's not going to not happen, but that hasn't landed yet. That's going to take, you know, 12 to 18 months for the buildings to get built. And the frontier models, where will they be 12 to 18 months from now when that infrastructure is running if there's enough electricity, right? And of course, we've been talking about the mini-dukes, right? So this AI infrastructure revolution, CapEx, I'm asking you, like, when, how far in the future before, what we're seeing now, pales in comparison to what is available? Okay. Some more of like the contracts that are built out the next five years and planned rather than what's actually been built. So a whole bunch has been built in the last five years and it better be pain dividends already, which probably is, in the fact our GDP is so pathetic right now, it just shows

1:06:13how many other things are headwinds, because we should be growing 10% per year every year at this point. And we probably should be growing at 25% every year. I think it's cutting out the inefficiencies right now. I think it's cutting out massively inefficient systems right now. Help people do that. That might not show up in the growth numbers, but I can't understand how it won't eventually. And about the personal example of, are you, are you an information professional? Does it benefit what you do? Asking questions like that versus nurses versus the guys that build the dinosaurs themselves with tools and hands on their feet all day. The guys that, the people that shower after work, not before work, right? So if you're the before work shower, because you're not getting dirty and sweaty at work, all I would say is you don't have to worry about AI taking your job.

1:07:15You have to worry about someone who knows how to use AI better than you taking your job. There you go. For sure. That's how I look at it too. Like, okay, if only 10% of my field will survive in the next 25 years, I'm going to be that 10%. You know, unless Bitcoin hits six or seven figures and I can put my job, but that ain't having any time soon. You're just naturally pessimistically accounting for, you know, just a reduction without the hiring. You're not crediting the growth that comes. All right. The good, you know, the number of insurance contracts and the number of businesses that need insurance contracts that you handle in your day job, right? Why can't that explode with the productivity gains? All those businesses still need insurance. Why not triple it? Why not? Think about the power of this technology. Then go back and look at the start of the internet and what that eventually meant.

1:08:17Then go back far enough and look at GDP after electricity and telephone were invented. This stuff is way more impactful than just the advent of the internet and the telephone in my opinion. Yes, but there's also a pretty stark contrast with actual physical goods. So we're not going to hit some utopia if we got all time diesel prices. I just don't think we'll grow out of it because of the data centers by themselves. But I get where you're coming with. I think Trump's looking at that and basically has said that he thinks we can afford the rise of fuel prices temporarily. It's worth paying for it. Basically, how you and I are paying for the Iraq war to end that regime. I'm sorry, I mean, well, that's for sure. I called the iran tax, I suppose. So all right, here's a threat or a problem.

1:09:17Let's say it is going to happen. But when you have such kind of top down investment, you know, investment, you know, you can say all these private companies are private, but they're not. This is all national security at the end of the day, not private companies. So the Google's Facebook's all them. And of course, all the other data center organizations, what if they are making a very malinvestment right now and they're building ghost cities that will never be used and will be in five years, will be totally out of date. And we wasted all this capital on shit that's not even useful in five years. This is me played devil's advocate. But with the more centrally planned to get, whether it's at the corporate level or government or both, we're really what this is. I don't malinvestment and, you know, building some ghost cities of data centers that are good, but it could have been way better if we followed a different technology that would have been came about organically without having to centralize, socialize, authoritarian

1:10:23down the line. That's how I look at it. Yeah, I guess I'd leave that to the scientists and engineers that know the direction of the infrastructure and, you know, how they build these buildings makes sense that the building itself should be, you know, able to handle whatever tech is anticipated for the next three decades, right, to be, you know, solid investment. Maybe they're building entirely, you know, disposable buildings that need to be torn down in five years. I mean, I don't know if that's economic. But I do think that we got the greatest freeest market economy working on that problem right now. Certainly in advance, we have over China because China would have way, way, way bigger problems in that regard. I would hope so at least if we, if not, then we've fallen way, way worse than I expected. But, um, and fossil fuels cost a lot more to them than they will for us. The longer this goes on with Iran, the more restructuring of the entire, you know, you know,

1:11:30oil trade to the west, massive shift, all the pipelines are going to go west in Southwest Asia, right? And the U.S. and Canada and Venezuela are going to be the, you know, that's where it's going to be. And it's pretty clear that the Trump administration, without saying they're going to do it, it's going to knock Venezuela out of OPEC. They'd be wise to let the Venezuelan people elect a new government before that happens. But that country be wise to do it anyways. And we've private investment going into those oil fields, you know, some of those leases 100 years, you know, Iran and Russia, they're never going to have that dominance in the oil market that they want to add, I think. No. So will they be able to convert over to their own nuclear and or other electrified systems, or probably not in a quick way because there's just so much, so much energy in fossil fuels that try to convert away, whether using nuclear or, of course, solar or wind.

1:12:35And to which we've proved over the last 10 plus years, there's no way solar and wind we're going to overcome oil gas and coal by any means. But anyway, yeah, I think climate socialism is nearly dead. You don't even hear anybody talk seriously about it, not in this country. You know, maybe there's enough zombies left in Europe, but I think, I think for a long time, you're going to see, you know, the North Sea oil fields in Norway and Britain, that those could easily open up again, right? Longer the war in Ukraine and Iran goes, more likely it is. I was actually, I'm not able to find it on short notice, but I was going through some potential Supreme Court cases that could come up in the next few months. I was using some AI to analyze that. And one of them was pretty much penalties, climate penalties can local, state, county

1:13:38jurisdictions impose carbon taxes or other types of climate related stuff. So that was actually expected to get to the Supreme Court. So I might have to go do some more homework and bring that back later. So otherwise, though, I mean, it's definitely hasn't gotten through and I sure as heck, hope it won't hear in the US. But yeah, in other countries, especially in the EU, they're shooting themselves in the foot all the time with carbon taxes and surcharges blah, blah, blah. How do you feel about the intervention, the Treasury Secretary in Asheville, the G20 summit? You catch any of that action? What's your feeling about the elite financial political leaders and what they're doing? Like the intervention in the yen or the meeting at the G20 in the whole entire environment. Yeah, because that really, well, they're obviously dealing with government bond rates,

1:14:43surging. We know that. We talked about that. What about, you know, 19 out of 20 G20 members recognize that China's trade imbalances are unsustainable, right? And that's that that I got to get some credit there. I guess was that never said before? I guess like it. And all like that. And the one member that blocked it was China and they didn't they didn't send their Treasury Minister equivalent to our Treasury Secretary Secretary. So, you know, they sent a lesser official. And so this actually results in any action. That'd be great if they're just like publicly censuring them from the G20 or whatever being like, you're bad. We don't like your deficit. You're really bad and naughty China. I think I'm going to do Jack. No, it matters.

1:15:45The policy matters. The soft power matters. It's when it's when people start to think it matters more than it does that we get in trouble. But it's not nothing. Okay. Maybe it's more of a laggy indicator than a leading in a way too. And that'd be a good sign actually. We're basically the Cold War with China. They're influenced throughout Africa, Latin America. Not America is getting heavily reversed right now, right? By us. You know, they're waning. When Obama and Biden are in president, see it seems to wax. Right. So, again, who's going to be the seusser and to who and whose elections are corrupted by who? I think I've said it pretty clearly, right? That's the China game plan. Their game plan is not working right now. And I don't think our answer game plan is working right now. Okay. Listen to Scott Besan talk about this. Strikes batten down some some some reporter who's trying to hype the the the failures of

1:16:52the US against Iran. And it's not that they were just trying to do some erector set radar. And we we basically watched them build it. And once they got up and turned on a signal, then we demolished it, right? Like, Monty Python, you know, cutting all the limbs off of the black night. It's it's like that, right? And Besan was pretty funny about it. Right. When you turn on the signal, that's the bat signal for it. Yeah. I had another good thought. But it's guess what? I'm on my 71st hour of a fast. Didn't even notice it did you, but I am running low on steam. I won't lie. Did that right? Is it the mental energy that a proper Patriot power hour episode requires of you can actually in 60 plus minutes, actually better the battery down in lifetime. I had quite a lot of work this week that I perform quite well during this fast as well.

1:17:55It was more like I had a really specific point I wanted to make. And it just disappeared from my mind, which could have happened anytime really, but I'm blaming the fast. You know, you know what happens in your brain when that happens? I'll tell you. So you were listening to me talking to you out of thought. And then you when I finished, it was time for you to use that thought. You went to recall it, right? And the chemicals in your synapses of your neurons and your brains surged to try to make that connection. But the surge and they missed. And usually what happens is if it was a sound thing that you were trying to recall, it's like was really there. Then you got to replace those chemicals to dissipate. You ever get that feeling like I can't remember something in the 10 seconds later. Oh, yeah. That's why I remember I was talking about, right? Yeah. That period is those chemicals kind of washing away because you floated this home briefly

1:18:57and you went and reached for something, but you missed on your reach. But afterwards, it sometimes that comes right to you. So to have a live test tonight on a Patriot Power, now that I've sort of threw a buster there for a minute, telling you that biochemistry. Do you remember what you were thinking about? Yes, I do. There we go. There we go. I did it up. It was just an extra point about the soft diplomacy is like, well, is that going to stop anybody from actually making purchases from China, especially when inflation's up so much people aren't going to voluntarily buy made in America or even made in Taiwan if it's a little bit more expensive than China at this rate. It seems so. That very detailed point, but it was in there. Like you said in that biochemistry, I remember you saying that before and makes sense. That really makes sense. Why you're like, ah, I should have said that or I should have remembered or I should have

1:19:59an argument. Maybe it's different logic and chemistry, but you know, 20 minutes after the argument, you're like, ah, I should have said that. I think maybe that's different. Yeah, I might be thinking of what you wish has said 20 minutes later, but yeah. I wouldn't want to be trying to have a 19 other G 20 members. And what should I mean, a surprise visit, by the way, Europeans weren't told ahead. They were much, you know, none too pleased about that, but Scott Passant had him throw up in North Carolina on an ounce, but you know, a member of the G 20 and we're hosting it and we're the president of it. So you've got the power to do it. So we took advantage of that power to try to shake things up internationally and you also talked about that capex and that, you know, some at some point that's going to land in the economy for productivity games, which, ah, no, I think all American patriots should be hoping that happens.

1:21:00Oh, it's only hope really at this point. There's no other way you're going to grow, grow out of it as they say or even soft land in unless you get massive productivity gains and real gains. Like you said, that actually work through the economy and have that multiplier effect of real investment, new jobs, new businesses, that all that engine starts going kind of almost that perpetual motion. That's great. That's ever since humans came out of the primordial swap or whatever you want to say, like we've been building and building upon what our ancestors did and it continues to build out an exponential rate, essentially, which is great. But now we're at the point where if we don't grow at that exponential rate, especially with all the fraud that's been going on, that's a problem. But that's all right. Humans usually, you know, step up big time in these situations, but we also didn't have nuclear weapons this whole time. So it's a little dangerous. Yeah, that sums it up. Yeah, and bio weapons too.

1:22:04Episode 360 of Patriot Power. This is what we do. This is what we do folks. If you knew the show, reach out. I'm on X as you changed your six. Nope. You changed your number six. Check out the timeline. Connect with me there. DM me there. How about you, Ben? I've been on X a lot more lately and I'm going to try to be on. I'm about two hours a week. I don't want to be on more than that, but I'm going to try to be on no less than two hours a week at Bancster Breaker. Just one continuous word, no underscores or nothing like that. Just Bancster Breaker hit me up on X. Like I said, DMs or tag me, repost my stuff. I know I've had it probably over my radio career lack of a better term. I've had a couple dozen people reach out to me, email or DMs. We've had a few on his guests. Number one. Number two, I just love the feedback. Bad or ugly. Don't hesitate to do it.

1:23:05I love it. We got a live chat during the show. Tell people how to access that and all the places. Patriot Power Hour goes out to. For sure. Well, of course, Prepper Broadcasting Network is the flagship that we are here with. And I think probably the best place, two best places. Number one, rumble.com. If you want the video, part rumble.com, you'll get it. We try to also re-broadcast on X. But I feel like rumble.com is the easiest. So look for Prepper Broadcasting Network there. We have the link in the description as well. And then number two, you got to search Prepper Broadcasting Network where we find your podcasts. iTunes or all of them. I mean, there's like 50 million places look for podcasts. And guess what? Prepper Broadcasting Network is at like 95% of them for real. So Prepper Broadcasting Network, we'll get all the different shows a dozen or more a week and look for PPH.

1:24:06Prepper Broad, or Patriot Power Hour, of course, our show. Alrighty, Ben. So I'm not sure we're entering September 26th in crisis state, but that heat map is hot and we will always be here reporting on it. If it gets black on red, multiples and quick succession, you know we'll be back in a special otherwise check us out. 6 p.m. Thursdays is our usual target time. Sometimes Wednesdays, sometimes plus or minus an hour, but Thursday at 8 p.m. we're going to be putting out a show, catch us on Patriot Power, Prepper Broadcasting Network. You should hand out. Thanks for bringing it out.