Ross Kemp experiences a record scratch moment | HBR News 543

This is HBR News No. 543.

Boss Camp experiences a record scratch moment, we discuss the news of the week, and give

it the Badger Treatment.

Hello everybody, welcome back to Honey Badger Radio, because they're doing well this week

and that you're laughing at all of this absurdity so that you're not consumed by it.

I am your host Brian, I'm joined by, as always, my lovely co-host Hannah Wallen and Dr.

Ranemercam on this week's HG, what's it, happy what, munted, I just said hello in an

enthusiastic way.

Oh yeah, it's unlike me, it is what it is.

No, I appreciate it.

On this week's show, we're going to be talking about a, there's like another MP that is

looking to start a ministry for men and boys in the UK.

Boss Camp has a new documentary about in cells, and there's a scene that was going viral

that I thought we could have some fun reacting to, and more, so stick around, it's going

to be a good time, and be sure to join us afterwards for the Patron Only show.

So I had this article from the rap, apparently if you are someone who's been looking at

stuff that's been going on in the film industry lately, you may have no, you may know that

Hollywood's been in a lot of trouble.

They're losing money, hand over fist, because they're making movies for nobody, for themselves,

but that's not enough people to justify their studios existing.

So they fired a bunch of men during the Me Too movement, which we talked about on the

show that, you know, if you're wondering what happened to your media, it's because the

Me Too movement went through like a title wave, a red wave, as it were.

And I don't mean like in the voting sense, the crimson tide came in, and it washed all

the men out, and then the film went to shit.

And now they're desperately trying to get their bearings.

And so there have been like studios that have been shut down and bought by other ones.

And there was recently a sort of a bidding war for the property rights of Warner Brothers

between Netflix and Paramount, and Paramount bought Warner Brothers.

So now Paramount owns Warner Brothers studios, and one of the first things Paramount is doing

is hiring a bunch of the dudes that got fired during Me Too, or at least lost work.

And so here's an article from the, what is this, the rap, entitled Why Is Paramount Hiring

So Many Men with Troubled Pasts, Hiring's of Max Landis is just a latest example of Paramount

betting on men who have been accused of sexual misconduct.

So we're going to go through this article, but it looks like white men are back in filmmaking

at least.

And they're not happy about it.

The modern audience, and you say, what, and do you mean juice?

Well, their definition of white is a moving target.

Let's just say a certain kind of man.

So we're going to be reading this in the Patreon Show.

If you guys want to join us for that, go to feedthebadger.com forward slash subscribe to start a membership

subscription.

For only $5 a month, you'll have access to the community and all kinds of extra goodies

like Patreon shows and lots of events like they do game nights on Tuesdays if I remember

correctly.

And there are movie nights and you know, a lot of great people there, including all of

us.

And if you give it high levels, you'll be able to join in the conversation itself.

That is like inside of the actual discord chat room with us.

So you can add your two cents if you wish.

So consider doing that.

And if you don't want to wake up one morning to find that our content's been heated

from the internet, go to badgerfeed.com that's badgerfeed.com I'm sorry about that animated

thing on the loop.

It doesn't stop and I can't stop it.

Even though this is an archive link, it still does that.

I don't get it.

But anyway, badgerfeed.com defined where all of our other content lives.

Now with all that said, let us get into today's stories.

All right.

And it's spoiler alert for just to get ahead of everything.

I am not going to be talking about the terrorist attack in New York City.

Just I just didn't really see the point.

I found it predictable.

Or any of the Iran shit.

It's already fucking boring.

Yeah, yeah.

The Iran stuff is boring.

Some people just have it under a microscope and they're just constantly tagging me in things

and I'm just like, let's just wait until something definitive happens.

You can look too closely at something and get lost in that without like looking at other

things besides, it's not like there aren't more interesting things happening that are

more, let's say, in line with what we discuss on the show.

Usually I only talk about geopolitical things when there's a lack of, you know, like specific

men's things.

But when there's more men's things, I focus on that.

So we have men's things today.

We have men's things.

Oh, and by the way, happy women's month, everybody, we have that in mind as we go through

the stories.

It's women's month.

Did you guys know women's history month?

Sunday.

Women's history, women's day, international women's day, my way to avoid it and not mention

it to anyone.

Oh, I know.

Like I do with Valentine's Day.

Well, here's what I like about international women's day on HBR talk this, this, this week

by the way.

My favorite thing about international women's day was it was also daylight savings, which means

women only got 23 hours when all the men got 24.

There we go.

That's fitting since they claimed to only get since the feminist was claimed to only

get what is it now?

It's the day gap.

70 some cents for yeah, yeah, the day gap every day is international men's day.

Yes.

Of course, every day is.

You know, one day that no one notices or celebrates.

Yeah.

We don't have to.

It's just that it's always around.

Okay.

Because that's because they they only have a 2023 brain cells for every 24 brain cells

a man has.

That's what it is.

Yeah.

All right.

First, let's talk about Dr. Luke Evans.

So Dr. Luke Evans is the 40 year old conservative MP for Hinckley and Bosworth, who is called

for the UK government to appoint a dedicated minister for men and boys.

He opened a Westminster Hall debate on February 25th, 2026, arguing that men and boys face

specific challenges that receive insufficient focused attention from government or national

institutions.

These include high male suicide rates, which of course, men account for the majority of

suicides in the UK issues related to mental health, social media pressures on young men,

loneliness and evolving societal expectations of masculinity, uh oh, Evans emphasized that

such a role would complement existing initiatives like the government's men's health strategy

and would benefit society overall by addressing gender specific problems without pitting

men against women.

The proposal has sparked discussion in media outlets, including appearances by Evans on

programs like Good Morning Britain.

That's when I learned about it.

I saw this clip of him debating a feminist on whether or not there should even be a

ministry for men and boys where he debated the idea with others, supporters, highlights,

statistics showing men's disproportionate struggles in areas like suicide and argue for

a coordinated policy focus similar to roles for women's issues.

While the Prime Minister has acknowledged and shared concerns about men's health and

suicide prevention in prior responses, no commitment to creating the new ministerial position

has been made.

The debate reflects broader conversations about gender equity in policy making with Evans

framing it as a step toward balance support for both genders.

Now, before I hand it off, I will say generally when we talk about solutions for men's problems

and the government says we're going to do this or that thing, I'm very suspicious.

I don't think the state can help men outside of basically stop being an obstacle to men.

But and I saw that Mike Buchanan, this is another thing too when I looked into this, Mike

Buchanan of justice for men and boys put out a article on that on that website about

this as well.

I think he also shares some concerns because the thing is is that I think that the blue

pill solution is just going to do more harm and I think this guy is not a red pill guy.

I think he's basically like, oh, men have problems, let's, and then they still have this

idea of equality in their mind.

Oh, we'll just treat them.

We're given the same thing.

We're giving the women.

It's like, yeah, but what you're giving the women isn't actually helping the women much

either.

So like, why are we like, why are we spreading the damage here?

And but yeah, I mean, that's my concern.

I also think he's probably informed by things like adolescence because that seems to be

what a lot of what's happening in the UK with regards to addressing men's and boys issues

coming out of is the not necessarily the show itself, but rather the message or the

central message of the show has become like a default mainstream message around the

troubles and challenges that boys have.

And so if you're operating from that as like your diagnosis, then you're cure or whatever

your solutions are probably not going to work out because they're based on a poor diagnosis

on a bad diagnosis, a kind of malpractice.

With that said, I guess it's interesting that there is a conversation going on around

that and that it hasn't like, you know, like sort of gone by the wayside.

I don't know if Phil Davies has still been active, but he used to be the guy when it came

to this stuff.

But anyway, with all that out of the way, I give you guys a floor.

Yeah, you said, you said the thing.

You said, basically, the things.

And yeah, I did listen to Dr. Evans's speech and he indeed raised some important issues

and he did a pretty good job of that, but his conclusion was along the lines of, we have

a minister for women, so we should also have a minister for men and then things will

be equal.

And as I'm sure I've explained before, this is rather a naive outlook on how the modern

British government works, it doesn't matter what office you have, you will be bullied

into towing the party line.

You'll notice we have a foreign secretary and a home secretary.

You might think this would balance everything out so that things are equal, but we've

never the less found ourselves with a government hell bent on fucking the home team with a sandpaper

dildo made of foreigners.

And it's the same with men and women.

It doesn't matter what you're in charge of.

The minister for health only gives a shit about women.

The minister for transport only gives a shit about what they could create the office

of the minister for biscuits and they too would have to focus their efforts entirely on what

women look for in their biscuits.

The office of the minister for women, it's fundamentally irrelevant because that minister's

job is to steal from men and to psychologically torture boys in the fake virtuous hope of

making life ever so slightly more convenient for women and girls.

And as I said, that is an intrinsic duty of every office of government.

From the prime minister all the way down to Larry the Downing Street cat, the whole fucking

institution has been long slow marched into this feminist tyranny and at this point

it's the only direction in which they can move.

If you appoint a minister for men, they will be in charge of teaching men not to be toxic

or macho or ladish or masculine in any way.

It will be exactly the same as the minister for women.

You can appoint a minister for anti feminism and that minister will be in charge of enforcing

feminism.

It sounds all wellian because that's where we are right now.

So yeah, respectfully, Dr Evans, the solution is not to appoint a minister for men.

The solution is to dismantle the office of the minister for women.

Well by that logic also dismantle basically all of the ministries because they're all prioritizing

women.

Yeah, until there's no office left except Larry the Downing Street cat.

Let's just let's just leave Larry in charge of everything.

And when Larry usurps the throne of the kingdom itself, only then will we have any chance

of beginning to undo the misanjic tyranny that has descended upon this one's glorious

nation.

And telling a government representative to diminish the power of the government is like telling

a wolf to stop wolfing, it's like telling a predator to stop predating.

You're going to need more than words, a great deal more than words and unless I am not

at liberty to complete that thought without getting arrested for the thoughts that I have

articulated.

So I will simply arrest my thoughts.

Good luck, everyone.

And rule but down here.

I'm going to shorten the statement altogether that the government just can't do this right

period.

Pretty much anything that you name outside of having a national military, enforcing borders,

organizing national elections and maintaining law and order.

Yeah.

Well, no, not even maintaining law and order, just enforcing the borders, law and order

should be maintained locally.

But facilitating trade in between segments of a country that are that are separate like

states or provinces and provinces and stuff like that that have different rules, that's

pretty much all of federal government is good for.

And it should be limited to doing the least necessary stuff, the or the least amount of

of necessary stuff.

And the rest should be left up to states, provinces and other names for different segments

of a nation.

Because this kind of stuff, all that you get with something like this is an office for

the enforcement of male disposability, which kind of doubles up on the military in all

honesty and is unnecessary superfluous.

And the reason for that isn't just because federalizing itself causes the problem.

It's because when people offload responsibility for their own vigilance and their own alertness,

their own consideration for the people around them and so on, their own welfare to a federal

system of any kind, a federal or national system of any kind, it ends up becoming corrupt.

When they offload that and they don't monitor it like obsessively for corruption, it will

become corrupt.

It doesn't matter whether we're talking about a system for showing consideration for a particular

demographic, it doesn't matter whether we're talking about a system that has a job of preventing

discrimination system for handling a safety nets system for handling any kind of educational

issues.

Let's see what else we got, environmental issues, none of that, it's not going to matter

which type of system we're talking disability, it doesn't matter.

You name it outside of, well there really isn't anything, like you name it and if the public

isn't consistently monitoring for corruption and sounding off about it, taking measures against

it, monitoring their politicians and taking measures against corruption among their politicians

that being voting the amount of office, if they suck, that leads to corruption.

In this instance, I think a lot of people feel like if they just create some sort of office

to monitor the issues faced by men and boys, monitor it in government and just, here you

guys take care of this, that the issues will be addressed and the problems will be handled

and the public won't have to think about it, but that's not what will happen.

What will happen is the vultures will come in, feminist or not, and start grabbing money,

whatever money is to be had from that office or, like I said, the male disposability enforcers

will come in and start using that office to impose male disposability harder and faster

and wider, basically, and that's all you get, that's all you get from government offices.

You don't get beneficial responses, you don't get help, you don't, even systems that you

would think would be helpful to people, like I'll go back to the disability system, right?

In the US, our disability system is folded in with our social security retirement,

quote, retirement system, nobody can retire in social security, it's not, it's really not designed

for that, unless you want to throw your butt into the county nursing home and live in poverty

during your old age. But the social security disability system is not much better and

you literally have to have the resources that you don't have if you're disabled to hire somebody

to help you prove that you are disabled, you have to do the thing you shouldn't be able to do

if you're disabled, that being fight for your benefits, that you paid into the system to fund

for however many years, and I'm seeing that happen with friends and family who are legitimately

disabled and have, like I've had surgeries because of it, can't stand up because of it,

you know, have continuing ongoing medical issues because of it. Like when you relegate your,

your welfare, your upkeep, your safety nets and everything, the federal government as the

American population has done with so many issues, you basically ask for the worst possible way

to get things done, or a system that pretends to get things done, but actually does jack and

shit for most people. And that's what will happen, I think, if there is a ministry for men and

boys or an office for men and boys in a national government, you will end up with the same level of

service that the people of the US get from our disability system. And then, then every time the

government shuts down because they can't agree on anything, we'll have this panic, is there going

to be funding for whatever things are now dependent on funding from that office?

And people who have jobs that rely on that funding, are they going to get paid, people who need

services that rely on that funding? Are there services suddenly going to disappear for a few months?

And it'll just be one more needle in your arm, as a citizen of your country, that you'll have

to be dependent on that government agency for things. It's not the way to go. And I understand

why people think, well, if women have one, they should have one too. But ask you to consider

women in Western culture, in nations that have offices that are supposed to oversee the welfare

and considerations of women have become profoundly stupid over the last couple generations.

Even women 100 years ago that were considered stupid by 100 years ago standards would look at

these women today who are reliant on these offices or work with these offices and just shake their

heads. What is wrong with them? Well, they've become profoundly stupid. They can't think for

themselves, and they can't do for themselves, and they're victims of everything. If you don't want

that for men, then consider maybe that equality isn't all it's cracked up to be, because I really

don't think it is. Let men and boys in the men's rights movement work on men and boys, and leave

the government out of it, because in my opinion, you will regret relying on the government for anything.

Yeah. That's exactly my feeling on it. All right. Let us know what you guys think about this one

in the comments. I mean, again, I think, you know, hard-pulling the right place, at least in terms

of the sentiment getting out there, it's getting people thinking about these things. I appreciate that.

It's better than pretending like it's not a problem that needs to be addressed. I just don't think

the government can solve that problem. And that's always been my primary contention with people like

the Tin Men, who is a much more popular, you know, men's issues advocate online, but he's very

much like a pro-state guy. Oh, we'll just have the government do this or that. It's like, that's

not going to work out the way you think. But anyway, and then I think that another thing about

that too is that when you believe that the government should be the gateway for solutions, it means

that you end up having to compromise your message because you're trying to get help from the

government and the government has the talk to it a certain way. You have to care about optics,

you have to care about language. You can't criticize certain ideologies that are in power. So you have

to do this thing about, well, if we have feminism, then we got to have something like it. It's like,

no, can we please not? But yeah, so this is my problem with it again. Yeah. I'm happy that he's

saying something and I hope more people speak out, but I just don't think the state is the solution.

But maybe the only thing the government bureaucracy exists to do is grow government

bureaucracy. Yeah, that's what it does. It serves itself, right? Okay, so we got a couple of

superchiles and then we're going to move on to the next story. So great indoors gave us $5. Thank

you great indoors and says it's that time of the month where we marched through the institutions

and let it free bleed. That's right. It is women's history month, herstery month.

And then we got one from Meredith G for $5 and she says, HBR News 543,

Honey for the Badgers, always assume that creating a government agency for something is only ever

going to lead to corruption and authoritarian controls. Yeah, and I mean, like you would think

after COVID, we would have learned this by now, but some people it's just not that easy. So

all right, you know what, we should have learned it from Title 9. Well, yeah, but a lot of people

don't even know about Title 9 and they don't have that in the UK, but in any US,

Americans should have learned it from Title 9 and simply put it existed for very few years before

it began to cost Americans millions and then billions of dollars. Yeah, it just became

incredibly expensive and it's ridiculous. If we can't learn from that and the mission creep,

holy shit, the mission creep, like it and it went from doing sort of what it was supposed to

originally be intended to do to exactly the polar opposite of what it was originally intended to do.

It was originally intended to the to its creation. It was originally intended to stop discrimination

by eliminating quotas in the university system and it then began creating quotas as soon as it

went from academia to sports and now it is used for discrimination against men in various areas

of education, including whether or not they're treated equally in the system that it forced schools

to create as a substitute for the real court system where interpersonal misconduct is concerned.

It became the human resources for students of universities and immediately began discriminating

against male students. It is absolute shit and everything the government touches does that.

Yeah, because the bureaucracy exists only to perpetuate itself and that is the prime example A,

prime example I should say, because there are several. Yeah, that one is just more recent.

All right, well thank you for that. Let us know what you guys think about this one in the comments.

We're going to move on to the next story. So let's talk a little bit about Ross Kemp. We're

going to stay in the UK for another story here. So Ross Kemp, a veteran British presenter and

former East Ender's actor, known for his hard-hitting investigations, is fronting a new five-part

documentary series titled Ross Kemp, Lost Boys, Deadly Men on Crime Plus Investigation UK,

also available on Amazon Apple TV and now I'm going to have to look that up on Amazon because

I'm curious about it. Inspired by the massive popularity and impact of Netflix's Emile Ward

winning many series adolescence, which dramatized themes of youth radicalization, misogyny,

and violence against women, the project sees Kemp delving into the world of in-sales,

involuntary, involuntary celibates, and online subculture, which is basically said to have

been linked to isolated anger, misogyny, and extreme views on masculinity. The series examines

whether in-sales are driving a perceived wave of violence against women in the UK or if deeper

broader societal issues around young men's disenchantment, mental health, and cultural shifts

are at play. Kemp, who's a father himself, confronts common media portrayals and myths,

such as the idea of in-sales as an organized terrorist group while he interviewed experts,

community members, and those affected. So what I thought was really great was this clip.

I'm going to show you guys the clip. First of all, let me show you this. He created, he constructed

a room. He imagined an in-sale room to look like. I'm not done yet, but I think it's interesting

because it's a case study on what? Can we describe this for anyone who's just listening?

Yeah, yeah. Oh my gosh, yes. It's like, it's like, go ahead. It's like a series of horror

faces. Screaming faces in that low light, turquoise, green sort of, yeah, and they're all

sort of screaming in anger and melancholy. You can see there's occasional bits of color

in that room on some things that indicate that it's not in black and white,

but almost everything in that room is in shades of gray that are tinted with cyan for anybody that

uses photoshop or camp. But yeah, all the faces look like...

Maryland Manson. Yeah, they're like screaming Maryland Manson faces.

Being forced to listen to happy 1950s rock and roll. Yeah, so okay, so the thing I thought

was interesting about this is that this is, he is trying to visualize the in-sale existence

based on what the media has told him. This is what he landed on. Okay, but here's the best pit.

And we're going to watch the whole thing. It's very short. It's like a minute and a half.

He does an interview or he's sitting down with a guy and he's basically telling him

what he believes in-sales are as though it's a stated fact. I hope the audio is working because

you know, I have that. We are by the way planning on going over this and more in doubt.

Oh, it's gold. It's gold. Yeah. In-sales are a misogynistic group.

Effectively they hate women. How many in-sales have become killers?

We'd say roughly between 7 to 15 are on the world.

Sorry. How many?

Estimates typically range from between 7 to 15 in-sale killers and roughly 59 people

have been killed in ideologically motivated in-sale killings. In the United Kingdom?

Around the world.

It's too many of course. But in-sale doesn't appear to be the phenomenon I thought it was.

It's clear that this documentary needs to take a different direction.

So effectively I have got everything wrong about in-sales. I think that they kill lots of girls,

globally and in the United Kingdom. I think there are a threat, a permanent threat to the

security of this country. I think there are hundreds of thousands of them. I think that they are

generally white and right-leaning. So all those preconceptions that I have are wrong.

Many of them yes. And it's not your fault, Ross, because if you were to just pay attention to

the media that is most often put out there about in-sales, it often espouses exactly the stereotypical

depiction that you bought into at the beginning. So don't be too hard on yourself. But there is

a lot of misinformation there about this topic that it's really good to appeal to the research.

Okay. So it would be hard if you don't think about it too much.

God, sorry about that. Okay. Hello, Matt.

That was an accident. I didn't mean to click on that. So

the Obama's are guerrillas.

So, but look, I will say before I give you guys a floor on this. So he is putting up this series.

He went in with a bunch of preconceived notions. Turned out he was wrong. And obviously it's because

of the media that the way that they portrayed in-sales. And I would say that

anyone else in this media space, anyone else would have just edited that out and just pushed

the narrative anyway. They wouldn't have acknowledged that conversation in that direction.

It would have been on the cutting-room floor. And the narrative would have continued on

unavated. It would have just been about white supremacy and mass murder, misogyny, and all that.

So I'm going to give him credit for leaving it in so that everyone can see his reaction.

What? That's just to get a slot to watch it.

Yeah, it's probably to get people watching. But there's probably still, but the point is though

that those corrections and him like to see someone eat crow, I'll take it. I was long saying.

No one wants to do that. Everyone's got way too much pride, way too much invested in these

beliefs. And to see somebody eat crow, and then put it on a video, even if it's just to get you

to tune in or whatever, I got to give credit where credit is. They did it to Russ Kemp.

Because Russ Kemp is a soap opera actor. I don't know. Do you all know what he centers is?

But no, yeah, it's a soap opera that's set in the east end of London. It's like the worst of the

worst. Oh, I bet it is terribly written terribly acting. You all have soap operas in the

way. Yeah, so typical soap opera. Yeah, it's that sort of thing. And he was he was a big character

in that and ever since like a heavy. Yeah, yeah, he's like a big sort of fucking. He's

a wide boy sort of thing. Yeah. And he's fancyed himself as a hard man ever since then.

And he's playing that. Well, you got it. It's not he's not a hard man. He's an odd man.

You just say odd, right? Yeah, he if you ever saw the episode of um, extras, he was in.

Oh, no, not that one. No, it really to base to this sitcom about. Oh, I know, I've seen a

couple of clips, but I'm not that one. Yeah, I was one with Russ Kemp and they really played on

him how he tries to play on his hard man image, but he's absolutely not a hard man. He's just an

actor who happens to be quite sort of steroid bulky. Yeah. And he's and and he's he's he's he's

tried to do a few documents. It's funny that that you all now think of him as a documentary.

He's done like he's he's done a couple of things where he's tried to present himself as a

serious person, but no one in Britain thinks of him as a serious person. He's a soap opera actor.

Yeah. Yeah. Finish the right up. Oh, yeah. Sure. Sure. So yeah. So okay, early promotions,

highlight his surprise at learning facts that challenge initial assumptions, including

load numbers of actual in cell killers estimated seven to 15 and the community's potential

vulnerability to violence rather than perpetration. Yes, that's also true. The documentary blends

the true crime elements with exploration of masculinity and crisis, aiming to separate sensationalism

from reality amid rising concerns over violence against women and girls declared a national

emergency in the UK. It has sparked discussion for its attempt at nuance, fact-based coverage

rather than pure dramatization. So that's the right up. So yeah, that that clip that we saw with

the Irish guy laying down the set the seven to 15 statistics, which apparently gave Mr.

Kemp some pause for thought. But just like when it comes to the Louis Thoreau documentary that's

out soon, only on Netflix, this thing is out on a similar cross section of feminist captured

platforms. There's there's no way in hell they're going to soften the message to which they've long

since been married. They're going to take that and then they're going to run in the opposite

direction and they go, oh no, no, we were right. Let's not go resting on our laurels and pretending

that there are any breaks on this on this train, let alone any hope of these bastards admitting

they were wrong about anything, let alone everything, which is what they were always wrong about.

In any case, this statistic that only seven to 15 in cells have been murderers, I bet the

thumb that that number includes Elliott, I shouldn't complete his full name because that might earn

us a community strike if I did so. And yeah, Elliott, what's his name, existed in the time before

in cells were a thing. He had never heard of the term in cell or even the concept in the days when

young men had found themselves rejected by the women in their lives every which way. And this was

just normal. Arguably has always been normal. Even since before the stone age, 60% of men were

effectively of this stock who didn't get to appropriate, 80% of women were reproductively active

while only 40% of men were. This phenomenon currently demonized as in cells has been the

majority of men throughout history or at least until we developed a pair bonding nature

that we could culturally nurture. And now it's, I mean, it's probably skewed even further

into this polyguinist tournament hookup culture. At this point, 80% of the women are sharing

10% of the top men and the other 90% of the men are left with the scraps. And they are referred to

as in cells. They're less aware they happen to have been left behind. Which even normies have

taken to mean a misogynist terrorist insurgent group called in cells. Meanwhile, in Britain at

least quite a lot of women and girls are actually getting raped by actual terrorist insurgents.

And the aforementioned normies don't give a shit because they watch the mainstream media and so

their farm are concerned with the 13 year old boys who have spent the first few weeks of their

puberty not getting ravenously fucked by their female teachers. And pardon my shattered pelvis but

I don't think Mr. Kemp's documentary is going to challenge that paradigm in any expedient sense

because in order to do so, you would need to start the series by laying out the blatant truth

that in cell is a term that was made up to demonize any man or boy who is not presently and at

all times receiving the carnal approval of and devoting his every carnal action to at least one

woman. Not just any man who has left the plantation i.e. a make-tow, but any man who has not yet

been bought to work on the plantation i.e. an in cell. Any documentary about quote-unquote in

cells should be entirely focused on the slave driving ultra-cons who are tormenting these men

and boys. But you're not going to see that on Apple TV or Amazon because these companies are

being run by the ultra-cons in question. So yeah, we've got a busy month ahead of us, folks,

we've got at least two extended misandric hit pieces to get through. This one and Louis Theroux's one.

Whatever, content is content. Watch this basis. It's going to be fun and infuriating at times

oscillating and at times at the same time. We do this so you don't have to. They don't much,

but it's honest work. Hey, my cartoon, it fits that rant.

It's it's it's the same thing every time, right? You see people who have been I don't I don't know

if brainwashed is the right word, but just lazy. I think that's probably more the right word.

Lazy enough to let the establishment media tell them what to think about something.

When they run into information that contradicts the narrative that the

establishment media has put out there, they they react one of two ways.

Either they give consideration to the new information and evaluate it on its merits or they

they freak the fuck out and start making accusations against the the establishment media or not

the establishment media, but the the source of the new information and so on. This guy looks like

he's going to at least give it some consideration. And it maybe it'll be good. Maybe the

documentary will be good. Maybe a look at things and he won't he won't do what feminists do when

they see this this information about about in cells, which when confronted with the fact that

you know it's been less than a dozen regardless of who's on the list and whether actually they

were an in cell or not and whether actually they participated in in cell forms or not and whether

actually there's an ideology in those forms when confronted with the fact that it's an extremely

rare phenomenon among in cells that that anybody self-destructing does so outward instead of inward.

Feminists will turn around every single time and claim that well there have been no no feminist

mass killers and and that's bullshit. Feminism itself the ideology itself kills men every day.

There are men all around the world committing suicide in response to conditions that have been

created in their lives by custody laws that take their children away from them. Do process

violations that take their freedom away from them and their reputation their relationships with

friends and family members and and the rest of their community by human resources type laws that

take their jobs away from them and their sense of purpose away from them by materials that they

are forced to digest in the school systems that they grew up in and in the workplaces that they work

in now that demonize them for being men. They're dying men are dying all over the world because of

feminism directly because of feminism. Feminists agitate directly for discriminatory law and policy

to throw men under the bus and it is crushing them and all we hear about from the establishment

media is that men who do not have women's vaginal seal of approval are demons. Half of them in

the world at least are in cells. I guarantee you that number is probably higher. If 80% of women

are competing for 20% or 10% or 5% depending on who you talk to of men that means they are ignoring

most men and even the you know the scraps the ones that just can't get the attention of the men that

they're competing for. They're still not going for the bottom of 50%. They're still going to be

going for the few that the other women aren't competing for at the top of the group that the

other women aren't competing for. Even women who call themselves in cells are in that position

only because they are competing for the top 20% of men and if they settle they're settling for

the next 10% down not men who are at their level. That is just a fact and so when you look around

the world and you see all of the military violence that is taking place. The wars and terrorism

gang violence which has become increasingly militant and organized over the years.

That's a result of the imposition of male disposability by female rejection.

You're not one of the top 20% you're not one of the top 10% you're not one of the top 5%

you might as well go die. That is essentially the message that women especially feminists are

sending and if you reject that message they will call you a terrorist for not dying not for doing

anything else for not dying. They're wrong men are vital to the survival of civilization.

More so than women women are in the process of destroying it right now.

But but that is the situation. If anybody is guilty of mass murder it is feminists

and they will never admit that. They will always tell you it doesn't count because we're not using

guns. It doesn't count because we're not stabbing people to death. It doesn't count because we're

not going into a specific area and one individual from the movement directly murdering. It's just

the government. It's the government's fault. It's the men who passed the laws that feminists

demanded. Don't buy that bullshit from them. Hold them accountable. Why did you demand those laws?

Why did you decide that men shouldn't be able to raise their own children? Why did you decide

that men should be imprisoned for decades for crimes they didn't commit in order to avoid

embarrassing liars who falsely accused them? Why did you decide that men should not have

any place in the world where they can go to get away from the haranging of crazy bitches that want

to control their environment and their behavior and the way they think and the way they talk and the

way they look and the way they sit. If not to kill them, why did you do that? And feminists aren't

going to be able to answer that question. They will make up lies. They will claim that men are

murdering them. They will say anything they can to avoid accountability because they are allergic to

it. You will see them have a reaction that is the psychological equivalent of anaphylactic shock.

Then they'll start falsely accusing you and they will block. But at no point will they take

accountability for it. But they should still be held to account. They should still be asked

and they should hear it from every angle until it can no longer be ignored.

Again, it's that vigilance and that pushing back against corruption that makes the difference.

I'm going to take this right back to the whole ministry thing. This is why a government office,

a federal or national government office for the welfare of men and boys isn't going to be the

solution to any problems. It's going to take every guy out there rejecting the feminist message,

turning it around on feminists and holding them to account and holding the government to account.

Why are you listening to these stupid bitches? They are killing men and that is the only way to fix this.

Yes, yeah, yeah. Murder of crows says, you forgot breathing. Yes, I've heard it. Why do you breathe

like that? I am not surprised. They probably call it man breathing since they put man in front of

everything else. Oh, you're sucking up all the oxygen in the room. And it is typical.

That's it. Okay. All right. Well, thank you for your commentary and thank you guys. Again,

if you want to send us a message, go to FeedTheBadget.com for a slash just a tip and send us a message

so you can add to the conversation. I will generally prioritize reading those before I read super

chats or rumble rants. So please consider that. And if you're watching us on mobile, I see a

couple of people there and you're wondering where is everybody. Move it on over to our main

channel. Click on the link to our channel and you'll see that we have a horizontal going out.

And that's where the party is. So hopefully I'll see you guys over there in the horizontal as well.

Or you can just stay in the vertical. That's okay too. All right. So with that said, we're going to

move on to the next story. Let us know what you guys think about this one in the comments below.

All right. This is not Gangnam style. This is a parody. It's from like a little bit of a PSA or

ad for NASA. And we're talking about the man in the bottom there. Eric Sim. So Eric Sim is a 39-year-old

former NASA engineer who filed a federal lawsuit in the US District Court for the Southern District

of Texas against the city of Houston to Houston Police Department detectives and four women who

accused him of sexual assault. So he is fighting back. The 57-page complaint filed on February 25th

alleges that Sim was the target of a coordinated smear campaign and malicious prosecution

after the women whom he claims conspired via group chats following the end of casual dating

relationships may false allegations of sexual assault against him in 2024. Sim asserts that the

detectives fabricated probable cause affidavits ignored inconsistencies and statements with held

exculpatory digital evidence such as messages proving encounters were consensual and tampered with

or deleted data from his seized devices leading to his arrest on multiple counts and the subsequent

dismissal of all charges by prosecutors before trial. The lawsuit claims the ordeal violated Sim's

constitutional rights caused by the destruction of his career, including his termination from NASA

and amounted to an abuse of the criminal justice system driven by revenge motives. Sim seeks a

jury trial and damages for malicious prosecution civil rights violations and related claims. The case

has drawn local media attention in Houston with reports highlighting the drop charges and Sim's

accusations of police misconduct and weaponized allegations, though no responses from the defendants

or further developments were detailed in the initial coverage. Get it! Get those bitches and I

want to see them sued from here to kingdom coming back, but anyway and I see that this this is

actually a thing I've noticed I've seen a few instances of this where men are fighting back

litigiously against false allegations that women are making and look I it's not like everyone can

do this stuff but I think it's important that you don't stay silent on this and you fight back

but anyway I will leave it to you guys a comment. This is the way this is exactly the way that it

needs to be handled every time that it is possible every time there's a legal avenue for this when

a false accuser targets a man with allegations of of intimate partner violence or sexual misconduct

of any kind. His response needs to be consultant attorney find out if it's feasible for him to sue

and sue every individual and every government agency involved in wrongdoing.

If the if the accuser is the only person that that lied sue the shit out of the accuser if the

police mishandle or the human resources department of your workplace mishandles the allegation

sue them as well if the prosecutor mishandles things if the prosecutor commits any process crimes

or violates your rights sue them as well you can there isn't any illegitimate target as long as

they are involved and and participated in the wrongdoing. If somebody comes in and lies on behalf

of the accuser sue that individual if there is a legal avenue for suing them any individual who has

done that because that is the only way to get these people held accountable especially in western

nations where you have laws like the Violence Against Women Act and I think it's called violence

against women and girls something or another in the UK and there's a similar law in Canada that

protects liars against being held accountable for process crimes for which they would be

prosecuted if they engaged in say homeowners insurance fraud instead of sexual violence insurance

fraud you know sexual violence protection fraud which is essentially what lying about the stuff

is it's it's fraud and until consequences are brought to their doorstep these behaviors will

continue and at some point at some point in in the near future men start need to start getting together

particularly men who can get with men's rights attorneys need to get together and look at these laws

see if they are discriminatory for instance the Violence Against Women Act has gendered language

throughout the law that predisposes the judiciary the prosecutorial offices and the police to

view these types of violence as male perpetrated victimizing female victims only and any accuser

that is female as infallible and then the policies that are encouraged by by these laws are

discriminatory they especially the policies that relate to let's not embarrass the accuser let's

not make the accuser uncomfortable making the accusation these policies are specifically designed

to prevent due process and there needs to be class action lawsuits against the the federal government

the national government for having these discriminatory laws they need to be brought down and

replaced with gender neutral very sparse very direct and upfront easy to understand and

limited laws that do not attack due process rights for the accused and do not limit assistance

for accusers to only female accusers that's what needs to happen so yeah sue the shit out of them

sue everything that moves when when you go through something like this if you have an opening to do

it do it because it's the only way they'll learn all right Mike yeah no I've got nothing for this

one I'm like yeah yeah yeah you're you're doing it right I've got nothing to get pissed off about

as you were gentlemen yeah I think it's just good news it's it's good to see you know I mean

obviously the guy is smart enough to do it he was a NASA you know one would hope but um yeah

I think it's good and I hope he takes him to cleaners we'll follow up when we learn more um

and uh yeah that's not what you guys let let let us know what you guys think about this one

in the comments it's time for to move on to the next story uh all right so here's another one

that might be a bit of good news so you guys remember we covered this in October of 2024

so a while ago uh HMNZ's mana huani a loyal New Zealand navy dive and hydrographic vessel

commanded by commander Yvonne Gray pictured here ran aground on a reef off the coast of Samoa

during a hydrographic survey operation the ship struck a known navigational hazard southwest

of taffi tola village on upolu island on the evening of october 5th this is in New Zealand or as

I like to call it middle earth uh oh so on the evening of october 5th caught fire after grounding

and ultimately sank the following day all 75 people aboard the ship were safely evacuated

with no injuries or fatalities though the incident caused an oil and diesel spill and drew

international attention particularly online trolling directed at gray as a female commanding officer

uh New Zealand's defense minister and others publicly defended her against such attacks emphasizing

the focus should remain on operational facts rather than her gender yep at the front fell off

the front starts supposed to fall off yeah how many people know that mean you know

that and no I don't remember that I mean the fact that problem with the front fell off

and 10,000 tons of crude oil though I mean the front starts supposed to fall off and now there's

the 10,000 tons of crude oil but at the end of the day the front fell off look at it look up the front

fell off I'll look it up I'll look it up in early March 2026 so this is why I'm following up I

shared this on my uh in the discord group that we get our where I grab the stories and Mike

Jay said oh this story is old because it wasn't like the follow up but uh in early this earlier

this week it was like last week or something uh the New Zealand defense force announced that

charges have been laid under the armed forces discipline act in night of 1971 against gray and

two other senior officers the allegations stand from a prior court of inquiry and center on negligence

failure to disengage autopilot in time poor risk management for hydrographic work near reefs

absence from the bridge in a hazardous area inadequate supervision and decisions that contributed

to the ship being lost gray faces alternate charges of neglect neglect neglect wait negligente

negligently permitting the vessel to be lost by being absent or failing to attend to her duties

and could face up to two years of imprisonment if convicted at the upcoming court martial

this is a military trial no date has been set yet although her lawyer gray has denied the charges

and plans to defend them vigorously while noting she has endured significantly unjustified criticism

the case has been revived has revived media coverage including renewed discussions

of sexism in the initial backlash though the proceedings remain focused on alleged bridge and command

errors and it was also worth pointing out that when we covered the story originally i think that the uh

the the New Zealand or middle earth's government uh was basically celebrating the fact that it was like

she was i think like a first in terms of like women in charge so i just thought it was funny like

the the nobody was hurt but i think New Zealand lost like you know half their gdp like from the

impact it was like billions of dollars or whatever New Zealanders have like gold coins i don't know

what do they have the tiny complement of their fleet it's quite it's it's a significant loss

yeah i'm not saying men have never done this i'm sure there are numerous examples of male navy

commanders losing vessels in similar instances of you know Darwin was like this but it's a matter

of frequency it's a matter of proportion this woman sank ten percent of the New Zealand fleet

through pure negligence i don't think any man has ever done that maybe it's a coincidence i don't

know it's a question of how big your fleet can be before you endeavor to put a woman in charge

of one of the vessels and more importantly if you're going to put a woman in charge of a million

tons of metal it ought to be because she is more qualified than all of the other candidates

not because she's a she you could say the same about any demographic you could put a fucking penguin

in charge of a vessel and and and that vessel gets disintegrated and then it is not necessarily

penguin phobic to conclude that you probably shouldn't have put a penguin in charge just because

it's a penguin and that's what you did isn't it you put a woman in charge just because she's a woman

and yes you could wax lyrical all day that no one died yet sure this penguin destroyed a billion

dollar vessel but at least no one died yes that speaks well to the men who were in charge of the

evacuation process it doesn't speak well to the penguin who was in charge of keeping the

vessel afloat in the first fucking place and it will do you no good to cry you just hate penguins

you're just trolling this poor penguin because you're a mispenguinist no dickhead you are an

anti-humanist because you're denying humans the opportunity to command a ship because you're

so fucking preoccupied with being inclusive to penguins fuck penguins they should all

fuck off to the mountains and we'll see who comes back stronger neurata's voice yes he is still

talking about women women should do what men do women should do what the top one percent of male

risk take is due many may die but that's the sacrifice I'm willing to make

but why there you go I think the thing that really struck me about this is the whole

little misogyny the trolling is misogyny blah blah blah blah um is she aware that

instances and it doesn't necessarily have to be military like um

oil companies have had some pretty catastrophic uh accidents and every single time you know the

the man in charge gets mercilessly ridiculed and uh the one that comes to mind first is old actually

exon mobile had uh um an oil spill i want to say in new york it might have been one of the carolinas

but it's one was one of the east east coast harbors and it was it was pretty big and it was

considered a pretty big disaster at the time and uh and it was we heard all about the cleanup

BP had the same thing with um not with a ship but with a uh uh with with drilling and uh you know

when that happened here i uh vel does not um yep yep uh murder of crows and and of course

there was i can't remember which comedian it was came out and and like really sexualized it you know

jokes like oh i'm only gonna come in halfway into your harbor and and and and all that um i think

the captain was accused of being drunk i don't know if that ever panned out to he was actually drunk

or not but the um the uh out the the upshot of it was the the captain was like i said mercilessly

ridiculed and if the sexes had been reversed it would have been referred to as all kinds of sexual

harassment misogyny whatever else as as an excuse to try to silence criticism of the captain's

behavior but because the captain is a man and the fact that you know men's reputations are as

disposable as men themselves in society uh instead of um suggesting that maybe it was mean

to criticize and make fun of the uh individual with the prestigious and highly responsible

office uh to to wreck a ship and create a huge mess um well they they just escalated the ridicule

and the criticism because it was a dude and of course you saw how the uh officials the male officials

at bp were uh were ridiculed as well and not only were they ridiculed but the uh then president

obama actually um used it as an excuse to reimpose the moratorium on offshore oil drilling

in in the us for at least some time period so uh yeah it it it's a totally different story when

the person being criticized as female all of a sudden you're not allowed to talk about that thing

she did all of a sudden you're not allowed to get had all of a sudden you're not allowed to think

she did anything wrong all of a sudden if you do criticize the things that she did and get mad

and think she did something wrong and uh and want to talk about you're not allowed to be sarcastic

right you're not allowed to do any of the things you would do if the individual was male you're not

allowed to gender your criticisms you're not allowed to uh use any stereotyping or any such thing

that that might go along with those criticisms because it's a woman this time and women are

supposed to be exempt right which is one of the reasons why women don't belong in positions of

power and authority because they can't take the responsibility they can't have the accountability

to recognize that when they do something wrong when they fuck up they're going to get criticized

and it is going to be mean especially when they fuck up big time and the whole world

knows about it sees it happening and has every reason in the world to ridicule what they did

or get angry about what they did and and discuss the damage that they did it's just absolutely

an indictment of female accountability when there's every reason in the world to suggest that

maybe this woman shouldn't have been piloting driving, captaining whatever and then the response is

oh how dare you don't you know this is a woman she's exempt you misogynist sorry that is just

it's not valid it wasn't valid when it was accepted it's not valid now and it's becoming less

accepted and if you don't want women to start getting excluded from these types of positions

on the basis of their unaccountability should stop using the word misogyny to respond to every

criticism that is made of them all right so we're going to move on to the next story in a bit but first

I'm going to look at this so because Mike said we should oh there's no audio we hold on I gotta

I gotta let me stop sharing and then I gotta share it again because now I really want to know

so here we go all right

better thank you this ship that was involved in the incident of Western Australia this week

yeah the one the front fell off yeah yeah that's not very typical I'd like to make that point

or how is it untypical well there are a lot of these ships going around the world all the time

and very seldom there's anything like this happen I just don't want people thinking that tank

as I'm safe was this tanker safe well I was thinking more about the other ones the ones are

to safe yeah the ones the front doesn't fall off well if this wasn't safe why did it have 80 000 tons

of oil on it but I'm not saying it wasn't safe it's just perhaps not quite as safe as some of the

other ones why well some of them are built so the front doesn't fall off at all

the ocean has built so the front fall off well obviously not how do you know what is the front

fell off and 20 000 tons of crude oil spilled into the sea caught fire it's a bit of a give away I

just like to make the point that that is not normal well what sort of standard of these oil tankers

built to oh very rigorous maritime engineering standards what sort of thing well the front's not

supposed to fall off for a start okay okay I got the bit it's extra funny when it has an

Australian accent attached to it but it's pretty funny that's what's the follow I mean does it

keep going like that Mike for it's like yeah you got you got the idea yeah okay get a bit

thing on that feed it's good it's good all right so anyway I got a super chow and we're going to

hold on a second here let me make sure that this is still sharing for you guys okay I got a

super chow and then we're going to move on to the final story so Richard Beere gives us five

dollars and says outside of the sexual encounters this sounds eerily similar to the Seneca

Ville Valley high school incident he's lucky that a group of knights in leather didn't show up to

his residence and decided to just take care of business yeah he's talking about the previous

story with the NASA guy fighting back against the yeah well that's the thing like these these

allegations they are like I don't know man these these people don't realize how serious they can be

like there was one made against Andrew Wilson um just like casually thrown out by some

podcaster we basically called him a rapist and it's like do you not you just say that shit because

you're mad at him do don't you think that like this is really really dangerous you're playing with

fire basically but anyway uh thank you Richard for the super chow okay so we're going to move on

to the next story and I got to set it up first because this one uh it's amazing okay so

in Brooklyn Park which is historic district inside of Richmond Virginia a pro palestine mural

is creating controversy but not for the reason you may suspect so the mural created by Lauren

East of Los Angeles well let let's just let's just look at the mural and you tell me if there's

anything weird about it all right so historically you might not know this but the pre the

Freight Palestine has always been a watermelon they use the watermelon because it has the colors

of the flag and this is a way of sort of signaling to people who are pro palestine uh without like

exposing what they're actually showing which is the flag of Palestine now

seems a little I don't know it's a little um I mean it's very well painted but uh not everybody

was happy with this so you're waiting funny because I might not know what they're doing but it's

funny because like let's know what they're doing okay okay okay so the mural created by Lauren

East of Los Angeles depicts a brown skin woman holding up a watermelon whose seeds fell out the phrase

free Palestine and while the woman is clearly meant to be a Palestinian and the watermelon has

long been associated as a symbol of Palestine not everyone knows this certain members of Richmond's

community which by the way this is in a black neighborhood where this mural was played paste but

you know where it was set up um they it drew some concern with the mural president of the Richmond

chapter of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference William F. McGee stated quote graphic

illustrations such as this have been used to denigrate African-American people to make us feel like

we're less than to make us feel smaller to make us feel unintellectual lazy shiftless and quote

local civil rights activist Gary Flowers acknowledged the meaning of the mural but still took

issue with it stating quote we've come fully aware of the Palestinian movement and its symbolism

but in downtown northside a historically black neighborhood the sight of the watermelon that

is painted behind me is offensive when asked for comment the murals artist Lauren East said

I as an activist would never intentionally put my time money and energy into creating something

racist or harmful to any community rather the opposite I don't know what the problem with that I

like watermelon don't you guys like watermelon anyway you like watermelon is the question and if

the answer is yes then what the fuck is the problem if you like if you showed a picture of an

Englishman enjoying a cup of tea I would not be offended even though and I'm risking my reputation

as an Englishman when I say this I don't much care for tea I'm I'm a coffee drinker as far as I

can send tea is coffee's weaker run of a younger sibling and even when I do fancy a cup of tea I prefer

green tea yes sorry oh well sorry Churchill sorry royal family I find Indian tea to be a mediocre

middle ground of underwhelming nothing no amount of milk or sugar will change that and nothing

is precisely for what I apologize and this story that we're looking at it is like me seeing a picture

of an Italian enjoying tea a North Italian shall we say an Italian who looks who white is like me

looking at such a picture and thinking how dare you don't you know that countless of my ancestors

were slaughtered in a war that was started over the destruction of several crates of tea

how very day it's the joke that a lot of us will tell because we pretend to give

all that much of his shit about tea and I'm not even going to pretend fuck tea and fuck

Italians it's not easy do you see it's as easy as saying fuck watermelons and fuck Palestinians

I realize it might be difficult to say fuck watermelons if you really like watermelons

it's difficult to say fuck fried chicken no matter who you are everyone likes fried chicken

it's delicious and it's infinitely versatile and and it's not against anyone's religion

but have you ever even met a Palestinian no then no wonder you can't tell when you're

looking at a mural depicting a Palestinian painted by someone who didn't have access to that

light oak brown paint paint they only had the requisite buckets of dark mahogany brown available

at the time presumably it's just it's just cheaper and you took that personally

whoever you are well sorry but you don't own that shade of brown you don't own any shade of brown

what when you consider when you consider most mammals and most tree bark and most dirt and quite a

lot of rocks that shade of brown seems to be the shade and hue most common in terrestrial nature

it's going to appear all over the place and maybe you should see your way to dealing with it

and maybe that's why coffee is better than tea coffee maintains its dark brown ambience

even when you add a cup of cream whereas tea becomes positively Caucasian

at the slightest drop of semi-skimmed pest milk all hail coffee all hail watermelon

and all hail fried chicken i have forgotten where where i was going with this and what i was

talking about or why anyone is even pissed off and that's probably for the best let us eat

drink and be merry and let us draw racist murals just to piss off the niggas it's funny

so long everyone it's not snowing you oh sorry guys i'm i can't breathe

oh wow geez there might be anything i could just say

anyway no this is sad this is and and and the only other thing that i'm going to point out about

this is was it was it just last week yeah no it was last Thursday your fire your fire alarm was

was something oh yes the chirp yeah that that act that had nothing to do with this it was not

foreshadowing we weren't trying to you know it's just i could hear it and it was driving me

fucking nuts and i couldn't concentrate because of it because i'm another stereotype there

um those loud loud beeping noises that don't have anything to do with what i'm doing in the moment

just completely fuck me up but uh in any case um now just just last week i think there there was a guy

who uh got canceled for having Tourette's and now we have this woman who did something overtly

deliberately she claims it wasn't deliberately racist but she could have put a light-skinned

person since this is the United States and a huge portion of the free Palestine movement are

uh light-skinned women with blue hair or various other colors of of hair that are not natural

um and nose rings and and shit like that um or or trans women she could have could have put a

light-skinned trans woman and watermelon but she didn't do that as she was trying to maximize

the progressive stack material that you could put on there and uh ended up

tripping up on the the progressive stack instead tripped over it and is not getting nearly as canceled

like i by and see anything about this i didn't see any discussion about this on x i didn't see

anything it didn't appear to have trended maybe it will as more people start covering it

but it didn't trend the day that it happened and there isn't some movement to get

artists of of this ilk put into a separate but equal systems like uh there was with people with

turrets right that i literally watched uh people argue on on x that people with turrets should have

separate but equal accommodations or be put in camps because they can't control what they say

like and it's not even a majority among people with turrets it's it's that particular

type of tick is rare it's just the most famous one because everybody thinks it's funny except for

the individual that it's happening to who is often mortified um because it happens at the

most embarrassing of times most inappropriate of times right this individual had full control

over her actions she she could have done some research into what might uh what might uh fly

in the neighborhood what might be um appropriate in the neighborhood what people might

identify with in the neighborhood and didn't do that she didn't do that she she just decided to

stuff as much progressive stack into this mural as she possibly could and like i said she tripped over

it and fell flat on her face and uh has has not received anywhere near the backlash for actions that

are fully under her control that a man received for having a disability in public like that that's

that's the underlying that's the bottom line and yeah this is this is hilarious the way that she

fucked up is hilarious um by the way guys is it is it racist to be allergic to watermelon because uh

i'm asking for a friend um but uh in any case uh it is kind of they just got to change the change

the free the the free palisine logo admit don't make it a watermelon try something else maybe like

i don't know like a bucket of wings or basketball maybe like um what are they going to do if you

use the flag the palisthenium flag well i the reason they chose water i know it's the colors

yeah it's the red green and like yep there is no law against creating a mural with the actual

palisthenium flag on it here there's nothing you're not going to get accused of hate speech

and and uh prosecuted people might argue more against the mural it might not be as easy to defend

um that you know people people might say hey you know we we disagree with the message

and be more likely to uh criticize the message as opposed to you know you idiot you put a racist

stereotype up on a mural that that's like what two stories high three stories high um without

considering how it was going to look to the neighborhood but uh what they don't want to do that

they don't want people to be able to hear for it let them let them let them fight

the more that the woke um community eats itself the better honestly but it doesn't seem to be

doing it this time no i think the main difference that i'm seeing here is that the individual who

had the faux pas is a woman yeah well they're they're just kind of but i mean if anything they're

just going to demand like money or something reparations reparations for the pain and suffering

the generational trauma that this oh maybe they'll demand it be 30 foot long watermelon

uh it's fucking art okay well i gotta we're gonna um stop it there i'm gonna wrap it up so thanks

guys for coming on the show we're gonna check out this article why is paramount hiring so many

men with troubled pasts we're gonna be looking at all of the talent they're bringing back because

the uh basically the people who kicked these guys out with the me too movement they don't know how

to make movies so they're gonna try and course correct by bringing back problematic dudes so

if you're gonna join us for the patron show become a badger yourself by going to feed the badger

dot com by bucks a month we'll get you into the discord server it's basically like the less

than a cup of coffee these days um you know while prices fluctuate our membership stay the same

if we can help it and uh hopefully we'll see you guys there i want to thank um mike and hanna

for their commentary on the story today i want to thank mike jay for helping me with that last

right up uh for that story that i thought was hilarious i want to thank the artist for painting

that mural and making my day and what i want to thank you guys most of all for watching the show so

uh if you guys like this video please hit like subscribe if you're not already subscribed hit the

bell for notifications leave us a comment and let us know what you guys think about what we talked

about on the show today and please please please share this video because sharing is caring thank

you guys so much for coming on today's episode of hbr news and we will see you next Tuesday

they say if you want to go fast go alone but if you want to go far go together at amica insurance

we know what matters most to you and we work even harder to protect it together as a mutual

company we're built for our customers and prioritize your needs amica empathy is our best policy

visit amica.com and get a quote today

forget everything you had planned for this weekend because you are sitting on your couch

and winning from the comfort of your own home i'm here with spin quest where you could play hundreds

of slot games all of the table games you love and you could even win real cash prizes new users

thirty dollar coin packs are on sale for ten at spinquest.com spin quest is a free to play so

void where prohibited visit spinquest.com for more details