
Showdown in mom's murder trial. Verdict in Microsoft employee murder. Plus, what is postpartum psychosis?
About this episode
Dateline NBC is made possible by:
In Massachusetts, Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney grills final prosecution witnesses after they testify that she knew right from wrong when she killed her children. In Florida, a verdict has been reached in the trial of Mario Fernandez Saldana, a man accused of arranging the fatal shooting of his wife's ex-husband, Microsoft employee Jared Bridegan. In Dateline Round Up, the trial is underway for Duane "Keefe D" Davis, accused of orchestrating the 1996 shooting that killed rap legend Tupac Shakur. Donna Adelson, the Florida grandmother convicted of murdering her former son-in-law FSU law professor, Dan Markel, is asking for a new trial. Plus, a psychiatrist breaks down postpartum psychosis.
This episode discusses suicide. If you or someone you know is in crisis, call the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or visit 988lifeline.org for more resources.
Listen to season 5 of the Dateline: Missing in America podcast: https://swap.fm/l/miafdlw.
Find out more about the cases covered each week here: www.datelinetruecrimeweekly.com.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Dateline NBC publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
481 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Dateline NBC — Showdown in mom's murder trial. Verdict in Microsoft employee murder. Plus, what is postpartum psychosis?. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Mazda has been named Consumer Reports' safest new car brand. It starts with our approach. Every Mazda comes standard with proactive safety features, so you're more aware of what's around you, more focused on the road ahead, and ready before problems ever start. Mazda, more of what matters most to you. Go to MazdaUSA.com to learn more. Consumer Reports is not indoors or promote any product. This episode is brought to you by Penn Foster. Sometimes things don't go as planned, especially with high school. When you start to feel like you're falling behind, having another option can make a real difference. Penn Foster High School is an accredited online diploma program built for flexibility. So whether you're hoping to go back and finish what you started, or you're the parent of a teen who needs a different approach to education, there is a way forward.
With self-paced courses, you have the freedom to learn on your own schedule. That way you can fit school around everything else going on in your life and stop falling behind. Don't just get back on track. Start moving forward with Penn Foster. Visit penfoster.edu-slash-dateline to learn more. Hope everybody's having a good morning. You're listening into the date line morning meeting. They have dropped the case on basically the eve of trial. Our producers are catching up on breaking crime news. It's all over social media. The DA is joining in on the investigation as well. Welcome to date line True Crime Weekly. I'm Andrea Canning. It's August 27th and here's what's on our docket. In Florida, a verdict has been reached in the trial of the man accused of hiring a hit man to murder father of four and Microsoft employee Jared Bridegan. In the defense, please rise and harken to the jury's verdict. In date line roundup, we'll check in on the trial of key fee D Davis,
the former gang leader accused of masterminding the murder of rap legend Tupac Shakur. And Donna Adelson, the Florida grandmother convicted of murdering her former son-in-law, FSU law professor Dan Markelle, is demanding a new trial. According to the appeal, Donna was repeatedly warned by the judge to not show emotions during the trial. Plus, postpartum psychosis. We've been hearing a lot about it at the murder trial of former labor and delivery nurse Lindsey Clancy. But what exactly is it? At some point, you may start to lose touch with reality. But before all that, we're in Massachusetts where the Clancy trial is winding down. But not without some legal fireworks in the courtroom. For the past five weeks, we've watched Lindsey Clancy stand trial for the murders of her children. Dozens of witnesses have talked about what might have driven her to kill them. Prosecutors say it was planned, the act of a woman who didn't want to be a mother anymore. The defense says she was not in her right mind.
She was overmedicated and suffering from undiagnosed postpartum psychosis. Now, in the final days of the trial, the prosecution has done its best to undermine that theory with three rebuttal witnesses who spent hours evaluating Lindsey Clancy. Here to tell us what they had to say is Nate Eaton of East Idaho News and the host of the podcast courtroom insider. Nate, welcome back. Thanks for having me. Good to be here. Yeah, so Nate as the trial winds down, fair to say this has been maybe the most contentious week of testimony we've seen yet. For sure, you know, this is the final stretch and the defense really has to nail its arguments home while the prosecution has to land their case. It's a battle of the experts. That's what we're seeing play out in court, which expert is right. Nate, before we get into their testimony, we should warn listeners that some of what we're going to be talking about is distressing and includes discussion of suicide. So the first rebuttal witness, the prosecution called was Dr. Averum Mack, a forensic psychiatrist who met with Lindsey in April of this year.
Nate, what did he have to say? Well, he evaluated Lindsey over the course of two days. He observed her behavior and went through her medical records from immediately before and after the deaths. And he reached this diagnosis for her. Her description of her experience, in my view, that, sorry, matched a major depressive episode. Did he explain what that meant? Well, he said that the diagnosis means that an individual displays problems with their mood, experiences guilt or worthlessness, can't sleep, and has a preoccupation with death or suicide. These were all things that Lindsey suffered from, according to the doctor and other doctors who have testified. But Dr. Mack made it clear that he did not believe Lindsey was suffering from psychosis or was overmedicated. He also said that she was very aware that killing her children was wrong. So this is a complete rejection of the defense's theory.
How did the defense handle this expert on cross-examination? Kevin Reddington, Lindsey's attorney, really questioned Dr. Mack's experience. He was quick to point out that during his direct testimony, the doctor incorrectly described what an episiotomy is. That's a medical term for a surgical incision used during childbirth. The doctor referred to it as a tear. Did somebody tell you that you will weigh off based on that testimony, Friday, sir? I'm not sure what you're referring to. I'm referring to you saying that an episiotomy is a tear. And it's not. And you're on our side. Question before the witness? I already asked the question. I'm looking at him and staring back at me. So Dr. Mack is a forensic psychiatrist. I'm just curious. Do we know why they were even asking him about episiotomies? You know, that's something in the delivery room. I'm sure he probably learned about it in med school, but that was probably a long time ago. That's right, Andrea. And that may actually be Reddington's point.
That he's arguing a psychiatrist meeting with Lindsey, weighing in on her mental health after having a baby, should have the expertise dealing with patients who have given birth or experienced postpartum. Now, Reddington made a huge point to the jurors when he went through Dr. Mack's resume that he really didn't have the experience. Where in here does it say that you ever came within breathing distance of a pregnant woman and your practice and your interest in your writings? Dr. Mack responded that he did have experience with pregnant women saying he had treated around 10 patients who experienced postpartum psychosis since 2001. So the prosecution not only had Dr. Mack evaluate Lindsey, but they also had another expert who happened to be their second rebuttal witness, a forensic psychologist named Dr. Kirk Halbrin. They did. And Andrea, the new doctor, Dr. Halbrin, said that Lindsey experienced bipolar two disorder.
So a different diagnosis than Dr. Mack. And this is just indicative, perhaps, of how subjective all of this is. Even the prosecution experts can't agree. But one thing they did agree on is that Lindsey knew what was right and what was wrong when she killed her children. And because of that, she should be criminally responsible. What's he basing that on? Well, remember how Patrick, her husband, went out to pick up some food and visit the CBS. Dr. Halbrin talked about the moment Patrick returned home. He found Lindsey on the ground outside of that second story window. As she was semi-conscious, after she had jumped from that window, following the killings of her children, this expert said something Lindsey told Patrick at that moment was inconsistent with psychosis. He said his first question was, what did you do? And her response was, I tried to kill myself. He went on to testify that someone experiencing hallucinations
would have instead said something like this. I did what I had to do. I did what the voice said or something like that. Nate, the doctor then went on to talk about something that brought the trial to a screeching halt. Tell us about that. Yeah, Dr. Halbrin's testimony veered into a topic that shouldn't be brought up in court. And that's religion. One of the things that she said when asked about what happened is that in the course of strangling each child, she said, go to God, baby, go to God. She was raised as a Catholic. And this, as I understand, Catholic considerations that's not necessarily what happens, but when I ask her about that, when I said, isn't suicide a moral sin? That's she, oh, Jeff. Yeah, can I see counsel over here? Now, the jurors were sent out of the courtroom and the defense immediately filed a motion for a mistrial,
claiming intentional misconduct on the part of the prosecution saying that they injected religion into the case and that this is completely inappropriate. What did the judge decide? Well, he was clearly angry, agitated, irritated, but he didn't grant the motion for a new trial. He said, I'm not going to give a new trial instead. He told the jurors to completely disregard that, that it was inappropriate and they should not consider it. At the time we're taping this, the state's third rebuttal witness is on the stand and closings will likely be taking place when this episode airs and we'll be covering those. And maybe a verdict on next week's episode. But I think the big question in all of this, as we head into deliberations, is how effective, do you think the prosecution has been improving their case that Lindsey deliberately planned these murders? It has people torn, Andrea. If you look at the prosecution's case, they had a lot of witnesses over 70, including these rebuttal witnesses.
And what's fascinating is that some of them contradict each other. We talked about the two rebuttal witnesses with the two different diagnosis and then their opening arguments. The prosecution suggested that Lindsey staged her suicide, but one of the experts they called said it was actually not staged that it was a serious matter. And it seems like sometimes the prosecution has been throwing every theory at the jurors other than psychosis. So you have to wonder if it's going to work in their favor. Lindsey Clancy's defense attorney has presented very strong arguments that she was indeed psychotic. And that's why they are asking the jury to find her not criminally responsible for committing these alleged crimes. Yeah. Nate, thank you so much for being on this. We will see you next week for what will very likely be the last chapter of this trial. Thanks for having me, Andrea. Coming up, a verdict in the trial of the man accused of hiring a hitman to murder
father of four, Jared Bridegain. There's a pill version of Osempic. Hello, I'm Osempic. And I'm other GLP ones kind of like him. Hey, did I hear there's a pill version of Osempic? Yep, you sure did. Ask your doctor about which FDA approved uses of the Osempic pen or pill may be right for you. Call 1-833Ozempic or visit ozempic.com to view the medication guide and learn more about Osempic, Somaglotide Tablets, 9 milligrams, and Ozempic Somaglotide Injection, 2 milligrams. There's a pill version of Ozempic. With no fees or minimums on checking accounts, it's no wonder the Capital One bank guy is so passionate about banking with Capital One. If he were here, he wouldn't just tell you about no fees or minimums. He'd also talk about how Capital One cafes are open seven days a week to assist with your banking needs, yet even on weekends. It's pretty much all he talks about in a good way.
What's in your wallet? Terms apply, see CapitalOne.com slash bank guy, Capital One NAA member FDIC. This is the story of the one. As a shipping manager, he's running the dock, stocking supplies, and making sure every order goes out on time. And Granger helps him stay prepared. From shipping supplies to PPE to hand tools, he counts on Granger to keep products moving and trucks rolling. So his operation runs smoothly, no matter the shift. Call 1-800-GRANJURE. Click Granger.com or just stop by Granger for the ones who get it done. For our next story, we're heading to Florida, where we're at the trial of Mario Fernandez, Saldana, one of three people charged in connection with the murder of 33-year-old Microsoft employee Jared Bridegan. Back in February 2022, Jared was driving home through Jacksonville Beach with his two-year-old daughter in the back seat when he stopped to move a tire blocking the road.
When he got out of the car, he was ambushed by a gunman. Prosecutors allege Fernandez and his wife, Shanna Gardner, who had previously been married to Jared and shared twins with him, hired a hitman to murder Jared. Fernandez is the first of the three defendants to go to trial and has pleaded not guilty. Dateline producer Mike Nardi has been following the case closely and is here to bring us the latest. Hey Mike. Hey Andrea. So Mike, it took three years for this case to get to trial, but the trial itself actually moved very fast before we get into that. Catch us up on what we know. Why do prosecutors think Mario Fernandez and Shanna Gardner wanted Jared dead? Shanna and Jared shared twins, as he said. And the prosecutors say that the two of them just could not agree on pretty much any of the decisions involving those kids. There had been repeated disputes over things like school, medical expenses, again, pretty much every decision involving the twins. Mike Fernandez never tried to hide his feelings about Jared from police. Jared heard an interview he did with detectives that he gave about two weeks after Jared was killed.
Let's take a listen to that. It's one of those things where it's just like, man, you need to get mine because I know people that don't like him. I told you I don't like him in particular. I don't care for that dude. Prosecutors allege things got so bad Fernandez hired a hitman to kill Jared. They believe the hitman is a man named Henry Tenan. Mike remind us how the two are connected. So Mario Fernandez owned some rental properties and Henry Tenan was one of his tenants. He rented a house from Fernandez. Now Tenan denies shooting Brightigan and his trial is going to happen next year. But what's important to note in this trial is that Fernandez's own defense attorney is not denying that Henry Tenan is the killer. They're just saying Fernandez had nothing to do with the murder. There's no DNA connecting him to the crime, no text messages showing that he hired Tenan and no murder weapon has ever been found. What have prosecutors done to try to convince the jurors that Fernandez was involved? Well, first they started. They wanted to sort of give the jurors a
sense of what happened to Jared. So they showed crime scene video from the night. You can see how dark it was. It was drizzling rain and Jared's bodies and the roadway covered with a blanket. Shell casings are nearby. It was just to sort of paint a picture of what happened to Jared. And then they asked the detective to walk the jury through security camera footage from the area around the shooting that night. They pointed out that a blue two-tone Ford F-150 was seen on footage in the area before Jared was killed and driving suspiciously. Are they able to say for sure who owned the truck? Yes, they were able to trace that truck back to Henry Tenan's father. It was registered to him. And also they found a tire very similar to the one found in the middle of the road at that rental property owned by Fernandez where Tenan had lived. So they're able to tie Tenan back to the tire and the truck. But it's not exactly hard evidence against Fernandez. So there was a gunman and a driver present for the murder. And here's what's important about that is that the man
the prosecutors and defense say was the gunman Henry Tenan is seeing leaving the crime scene on foot, which means he wasn't driving the truck. Someone else was. Micro prosecutor suggesting Fernandez was the driver? I think suggesting is probably the right word. They can't say for sure who the driver was, but the implication that they're making is that Fernandez was the one in the truck. Okay, so if they can't confirm Fernandez was on the scene, how are they connecting him to the crime? Well, I think the biggest piece of evidence here is the fact that Henry Tenan had no connection to Jared Bride again, except through his landlord, Mario Fernandez. He had no reason to kill Jared. No reason to know who Jared was. And the prosecution presented evidence that Tenan had detailed knowledge of Jared's pattern of life. And they're saying how else would he know this if it didn't come from Mario Fernandez? So to prove that, the prosecutors relied heavily on cell phone evidence showing that the two men were communicating in the months leading up to Jared's murder. They use location data to highlight what they say are some important movements before
and around the killing that the two of them must have been together. But the defense spent a lot of time attacking that cell phone evidence pointing out that location data can tell you where a phone is, but not necessarily where the person who owns it is. Prosecutors have also shown checks to the jury, which they say Fernandez made out to Tenan. Right. So it's three specific checks that the jury saw. And they were from Fernandez's rental company made out to Henry Tenan in the months after the murder. One was for $2,000, one for $3,000, and one for $5,000. So that's $10,000 in total. And prosecutors say those are the payments for Jared's murder disguised as legitimate business expenses. The defense countered, saying it's a much simpler explanation. They said, you know, these aren't secret cash payments. They're traceable business checks. Prosecutors played jurors, a recorded conversation between Fernandez and one of his friends. And he talks about the work that Tenan did for him. He was working for me for a bit like after. Oh, really? Yeah. Yeah. He did a lot of work, dude.
It seems like that could support this defense theory that Fernandez was just paying Tenan for work he did. Right. Right. In this phone call, Fernandez says that Tenan was doing yard and landscaping work. But, you know, the state focused on another part of that call where Fernandez is talking about getting a quote to take a tree down. And the quote was for $3,000. And he laughs and said, there's no way I'd pay that much money. And I was like, yeah, go. So the state is essentially saying if Fernandez is saying he wouldn't pay that much for the work, what is that check really for? Prosecutors have also argued that Fernandez can be connected to the type of gun used in the killing. But again, it's not conclusive. Tell us about that. Right. Right. So first and foremost, the murder weapon has never been recovered. So this is all sort of speculation in trying to connect the dots. But investigators say that Jared was shot with a 10 millimeter firearm, which is not a very common sort of caliber type of gun. And prosecutors
put a friend of Fernandez on the stand, a man named John Bigger Staff. And he had owned a 10 millimeter glock. And they believe that Bigger Staff gave it to Fernandez so that he could in turn give it to Tenan for the murder. Bigger Staff himself testified that he never gave a gun to Fernandez or Tenan and had nothing to do with the murder. Bigger Staff has never been charged in connection in the crime. Correct. Correct. Tuesday, the defense called just two witnesses, and these witnesses worked at the school. The twins attended. What was the purpose of their testimony? Both spoke to Shanagarner and Fernandez as parents and said they were friendly and involved, you know, just sort of basically painting a picture of them as a regular family. It seems a little, I don't know. I'm trying to figure out why they would call these two people. If this is your whole defense, what, what are you getting from this? I agree. It was seemed a little odd other than trying to normalize the relationship between Shana,
Gardiner, and Mario Fernandez. And closing arguments also began on Tuesday. What were the highlights? Presbycuteurs were, their goal was really to put all of these pieces together. Every little piece might not add up, but when you look at things as a whole, you realize that Fernandez had to have been involved. It was almost the perfect crime. He almost got away with it. What did the defense choose to point out in their closing argument? Well, they reinforced what they've been saying throughout the trial that there is no physical evidence that Mario Fernandez killed Jared or had anything to do with his murder. And they also say there was no motive. They pointed to the custody dispute prosecutors focused on and argued that the most recent family law case had been closed about four months before Jared was killed. So what they were really trying to stress to the jury is that whatever conflict existed, that case was over. There is no evidence they had any motive to take one single day away from Jared Brightigan. Okay, so on Wednesday afternoon, after just four
hours of deliberations, the jury reached a verdict. Let's listen to that. In the defense, please rise and harken to the jury's verdict. We the jury find the defendant guilty of first-degree murder is charged in the indictment. Fernandez was found guilty on all counts, including first-degree murder. His estranged wife, Shana Garner's trial, is expected to start in September. So we will be on the lookout for that. Thanks, Mike. Thanks Andrea. Up next, it's time for date line roundup. We've got the latest from the trial of the former gang leader accused of murdering Tupac Shakur. And all the details from Donna Adelson's request for a new trial. Plus, the Lindsey Clancy trial isn't the first to raise awareness of postpartum psychosis. 25 years ago, Texas mother Andrea Yates stood trial twice, accused of murdering her children. Central to her defense, postpartum psychosis.
One of you can see what's happening inside your body. Pre-newvos, whole body scams, screens for hundreds of conditions, including many solid tumors as early as stage one, all in under an hour. And now, you can go beyond imaging, with 80 plus blood biomarkers that help complete the picture. This Labor Day, save $300 off your skin when you book at pre-newvo.com. That's P-R-E-N-U-V-O.com. Save $300 now through September 8th at pre-newvo.com. Terms and conditions I'm Hannah. I've lost 75 pounds in 20 months with GLP1s plus diet and exercise. On Roe, I've gone from struggling to run a mile to running farther every day. You can access FDA-approved GLP1s online. Get the support you need to reach your weight loss goals. Go to Roe.co-slash-wait to see if you qualify. I'm a paid Roe partner, 20% average weight loss in one year in non-diabetic with obesity or overweight with a weight-related medical condition versus 3.1% in placebo arm. R-X only. To stay informed about serious side effects, go to Roe.co-slash-wait.
We've all heard those scary IRS radio ads that try to frighten you into calling, but tax relief advocates is different. If you owe the IRS $5,000, $50,000, or even $500,000, TRA has a solution for your tax problem. It doesn't matter if you're in your car, at work, or with your kids, no matter where you are, visit tra.com. Don't lose hope. TRA could reduce or even eliminate what you owe. Their passion is taxes and helping people and businesses fix IRS problems. They have over 1,000 five-star Google reviews and an A-plus rating with the better business bureau. You no longer need to fear the IRS. Generous tax relief programs are available now to give you a fresh start, so don't wait. Simply visit tra.com. That's tra.com or call 800-583-6429. Once again, that's 800-583-6429. Tax relief advocates, real solutions for real people.
Welcome back. Joining me for this week's Roundup is Dateline Digital producer Veronica Mosaica. Thanks for being here, Veronica. Thanks for having me. Okay, so first we are in Las Vegas, where the murder trial of Duane Davis or Keefe D, as he's known, is underway. Davis is accused of helping to orchestrate the 1996 shooting that killed rapper Tupac Shakur while he was riding in a car on the Las Vegas strip. Davis has pleaded not guilty. Veronica, this is a murder mystery that has gone and solved for nearly 30 years. What is the prosecution's case against Davis? Yeah, so the prosecutor's theory is that Davis organized the shooting of Tupac to avenge his nephew Orlando Anderson after Tupac and a gang of other men beat up Orlando at the MGM Grand Casino on September 7, 1996. So we should make it clear prosecutors are not trying to prove that Davis is the trigger man, right, just that he was involved in the orchestrating of this crime.
Yes, they are alleging that Davis is the one who got hold of the gun that killed Tupac and was in a car, the White Cadillac, along with Orlando and another two men who ambushed Tupac on the strip. So something the prosecutors have focused on during the early stages of the trial is trying to help jurors understand the context in which the shooting happened, that some of the players involved were members of gangs and that helps to explain the motive. How have they gone about trying to educate the jury on what they believe happened all those years ago? So according to prosecutors, they explained that Orlando was a member of the Southside Compton Crips and Shug Knight who was with Tupac and got shot too was associated with mob pyru, the Compton Crips rival gang. The prosecutor asked a former gang member called James Mob, James McDonald, to testify about all of this. McDonald made it very clear that he did not want to testify,
but he did explain the street rules surrounding an attack like the one on Orlando. Is it fair to say that your reputation and your standing in the neighborhood would require you to do something if you're going to get pumped by somebody like Tupac? You would have to go back home and fight everybody that called you a pump. Certain things need to be dealt with adjusted, living that life. And when I was living that life, it wasn't no advance but it wasn't no, oh, you get a pass, no, out of shot to be honest. When we talked about the case before Veronica on the podcast, we mentioned that a big part of the prosecution's case is what Duane Davis himself has said about the crime. And this week the jury got to hear hours of recordings of Davis talking to investigators about the shooting. Right. So back in 2008, an LAPD-led task force was investigating the murder of another rapper, the notorious B.I.G. And investigators believed that Davis might have had information.
Davis essentially told investigators that he was not involved in Biggie's death, but he could tell them about Tupac's. What did Davis tell investigators? He gave them a really detailed account of what he says happened that night. He admitted to being in the White Cadillac. And Davis said that there were three other men in the car. He named them. Terrence T. Brown, DeAndre, Big Dre Smith, and Orlando, Baby Lane Anderson. He described coming across Tupac and Shug Knight in their BMW. So you were going to, you were fitting a blast if you had to or you were deserved. We would have been on the last line, all over the bush. So you hand the gun to the back seat. You hear me? I gave it to Dre. Dre, we were like, no, no, no. And he's like, you're fucking too. Seems like powerful evidence for prosecutors Veronica, Davis putting himself at the scene of the crime. How is the defense fighting back? The defenses essentially asking jurors, which version of Dwayne Davis are you supposed to believe?
Because those recordings are not the first time Davis talked to law enforcement about Tupac. Former FBI agent Wade Lee also took the stand and told the jury that he interviewed Davis back in 1998. And Davis denied having anything to do with Tupac's murder. Very interesting case. Veronica, we now have an update on the case of Donna Adelson, the 76-year-old Florida grandmother convicted of orchestrating the 2014 murder of her son-in-law. Florida State University Law Professor Dan Markel. Last year Adelson was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Now she is asking the Court of Appeal to grant her a new trial. So Veronica, what is she saying are the legal grounds for this appeal? So Donna's lawyers filed a 90-page appeal arguing that she did not get a fair trial. One of the legal issues that they raised is that according to the appeal, Donna was repeatedly warned by the judge to not show emotions during the trial, which her lawyers say violated her right to a fair trial.
The appeal also claims that the judge should have granted a change of venue because of the public attention in her case. And it argues that the pre-trial publicity in Tallahassee influenced the jury to find her guilty. During the trial last year, Adelson, she chose not to testify. How is that factoring into all of this now? Right, so her appeal argues that the trial judge pressured her into making a decision on testifying, even though she said she needed more time to speak with her lawyers about it. The appeal claims that her decision to not take the stand wasn't a, quote, knowing, intelligent, and voluntary decision. Okay, so what happens next? Donna's lawyers have asked for the appellate court to hear oral arguments, and we can expect this appeal to play out in the courtroom. Thank you for these updates, Veronica. Absolutely. Thank you. Over the past two weeks, hundreds of women wearing pink shirts have gathered outside the Plymouth County Superior Courthouse to show their support for Lindsey Clancy. Some of them sharing their own stories of mental health struggles after giving birth.
But the Clancy trial is not the first time a criminal case has prompted a national debate on postpartum psychosis. Tonight, Andrea Yates sits in a Texas jail cell. 25 years ago, the country was transfixed by the case of Andrea Yates, a Texas mother accused of murdering her five children by drowning them in the bathtub. In that courtroom today, it all came down to one overriding question. Did she know it was wrong? It made us want to find out more about how our understanding and perception of the illness might have changed since then, both inside and outside the courtroom. Here to break it down for us is psychiatrist Dr. Catherine Berndorf, who is co-founder, CEO and medical director of the Motherhood Center of New York. Dr. Berndorf, welcome to the show. Thank you for having me. So, Dr. most of us have heard of the baby blues or even more serious postpartum depression. What makes postpartum psychosis different? It's more urgent, right?
Absolutely. We consider it a medical emergency because it needs immediate treatment. Often in a hospital and medication invariably is used to help manage this illness so that it is not lethal as we have seen in some very tragic cases. So, what are the symptoms? Often you see someone who doesn't really need to sleep. They're not sleeping, but they may be over productive or doing things in kind of a fast and agitated way, talking quickly. And you start to see all that in what we call mania, right? That may be the presenting symptom as it's going to emerge into a psychotic state. And that is an enormous red flag. And Lindsey Clancy claims she was told by a voice in her head to kill her children. Dr. what is going on biologically that could cause such a severe symptom where she is saying
that she's hearing a voice? So, at some point you can become psychotic. You may start to lose touch with reality. There can be fixed false beliefs, which are called delusions, where you believe something to be absolutely unshakably true. Going back to the Andriiates case where she believed that she was not a good person and her kids' chance to be saved to ascend to heaven was to kill them. Andriiates, she was convicted of capital murder at her first trial in 2002. In 2006, Andrea got a new trial and was found not guilty by reason of insanity. She is still in a Texas psychiatric facility to this day. It was a different time. You didn't have people out at the courthouse in pink supporting Andriiates, not as far as I remember. I don't think there was anything like that. No, I don't remember either. Why do you think that this case in particular with Lindsey Clancy has gotten so much attention?
I think to some extent, I want to believe that we're ready for it, that we're ready to talk about it as a society. She could be our sister, our relative, a friend, ourselves. And I think that the grounds health support for her, not for murder, but for her. And what's happened to her is a little bit of there, but for the grace of God, go aye. Lindsey's defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, asked one of her treatment providers, Dr. Jennifer Tuffs. How often she comes across postpartum psychosis? Let's take a listen. How many patients have you treated? Well, so is the policy postpartum psychosis? Well, in the span of one month, I would say none because it's a very rare disorder. Dr. Tuffs testified that postpartum psychosis is rare. Catherine, is there research on this? There is research and the data supports about one to two cases of postpartum psychosis in new moms per thousand patients. However, while people want to
call that rare, I would say it's instead uncommon. And when I say that, what I'm referring to is the idea that that can be 8,000 a year, new moms a year. That's not a small number. That's the prevalence as we know it, as determined today. And I actually think that there's more of it out there. You see moms going to drop off or go into the pediatrician appointment and not disclosing what's in their mind because one, why would they? They're going to scare somebody. They're going to make somebody, you know, they're going to draw attention to themselves. Perhaps have the baby taken away. There's tremendous stigma. And they don't know if they're going to be helped or believed. You can agree or disagree with what's happening in that courthouse, right? Of course, everyone's entitled to their opinion. But I don't think it's a bad thing that people are talking about this at all. And what is the first step if someone is feeling like they need help? Where should they go first? Be as candid as you can and tell someone who you believe will hear you and believe in you
and take you seriously. Because a lot of people say, oh, that's just how everybody feels postpartum. They're not sleeping. They're not eating while they can't concentrate. But that's different than I am not myself in such a profoundly different way. And I don't know what's wrong with me. And should they go to their OBGYN first? Yes. Should they go to a psychiatrist first? Yes. As a psychologist who all the above, I would say, whoever you can get to. And again, it's whoever you can get to that will believe something's wrong. Well, Dr. Berndorf, thank you so much for all of your incredible insight into this topic. Thank you. That's it for this episode of Dateline True Crime Weekly. But check out the latest season of the Webby Award-winning podcast, Dateline Missing in America. Josh Manquets is taking a look at six new cases. The first five episodes are out now to get early access to the final episode and listen ad-free, subscribe to Dateline Premium. Coming up this Friday on Dateline, we've got a classic
Heath episode for you from Hawaii. It's about a father's years-long quest to catch his daughter's killer and how he refused to give up. You won't be forgotten as long as I'm alive. Watch the other side of Paradise on NBC at 10-9 Central. Thanks for listening. Dateline True Crime Weekly is produced by Carson Cummins, Caroline Casey and Keanu Reed. Our associate producers are Ellery Gladstone Groth and Aria Young. Our senior producer is Liz Brown-Kurloff. Veronica Mosaic is our digital producer, Rick Juan is our sound designer, original music by Jesse McGinty, Paul Ryan is executive producer, and Liz Cole is senior executive producer of Dateline. Thanks everyone. Bye. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odo, the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one, fully integrated platform that makes your work easier, from CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce,
and more. Then the best part, Odo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch, so why not you? Try Odo for free at odo.com. That's odo.com.
More episodes
More from Dateline NBC

What's next for Lindsay Clancy? A teen's murder on cruise ship. Plus, does the i...
Dateline NBC

Talking Dateline: The Grudge
Dateline NBC

The Grudge
Dateline NBC

Introducing: Before & After with Lester Holt
Dateline NBC

