Loading...
Loading...

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Hi, I'm Darina, co-founder of Quo.
If you run a business, you know the team that responds first
wins the customer.
You've probably opened your phone to a bunch of missed calls
and no voicemails.
Those are missed opportunities, and exactly why we built Quo.
Quo is the business phone system that helps your team
handle every call and text right away.
Join over 90,000 businesses that win more customers with Quo.
Try Quo for free at Quo.com slash tech.
This episode is sponsored by the new film, October 8th.
October 8th offers a look at the real life impacts of October 7th
on the lives of Jewish people and the eruption of anti-semitism
on college campuses, social media, and in the streets of America
beginning the day after the attack on Israel by Hamas.
The film also uncovers how over decades Hamas created
sophisticated networks in America to permeate US institutions
and examines the tsunami of online anti-semitism
and disinformation unleashed by Iran, China, and Russia
with the goal of dividing American society.
The film features expert insights from the likes of
Barry Weiss and Douglas Murray.
This is a vital wake-up call about the threat of extremism
against democracy and October 8th is now available
to buy or rent on Amazon Prime Apple TV and YouTube.
Hello and welcome back to Unheard.
I'm Florence Reed.
Today we come to you with a rather esoteric story.
Exorcism requests are rising globally.
50% of surveyed US diocese reported increased demand,
particularly post-pandemic, and the number of US exesists
has grown from 24 to 150 in 15 years.
Demand in Italy has also tripled in the last decade
with an estimated 500,000 people seeking help annually.
Membership of the International Association of Exesists
has grown from 250 members in 30 countries in 2014
to over 1,000 members across 58 countries,
so there's certainly a boom.
Gallup and Huffington Post polls indicate approximately
half of Americans believe in demonic possession
and younger generations up to the age of 27
show the highest percentage of believers 63%
compared to only 44% of those over 65,
so maybe it's Gen Z leading the charge.
Today I'm going to be joined by three experts
in the realm of exorcism.
Dr Francis Young is a historian and author of
History of Exorcism in Catholic Christianity.
Reverend Dr. Jason Bray is the Dean of Land After Cathedral
and a Deliverance Minister, which is the name they give
to exorcists in the Anglican Church,
so he'll tell us exactly what it's like to actually perform
in exorcism.
And Professor Helen Hall is the Associate Professor
at Nottingham Law School and an Anglican priest.
She's one of the UK's leading experts in the intersection
of law and religious practice,
and we'll be telling us a little bit about what it means
to have a multi-faith society in which exorcisms
are not always being performed to the highest standards.
So to kick us off, I'm going to ask Dr. Francis Young
to give us a brief history of exorcism in the English Church.
Francis exorcisms are not exactly something
we associate with the Anglican Church.
We usually think of them as something done by Catholic priests
like in the film The Exorcist.
Tell us a history of the Church of England
and its relationship to exorcism.
Where did it all start?
So exorcism is a very ancient practice indeed.
It's as old as the existence of the written word
and the earliest examples that we have
are from ancient Mesopotamia.
And the Greek word that we use exorcao,
which is what our exorcism word comes from,
is to do with swearing by something.
So the idea that you swear by your gods
in order to intensify the power of a statement.
And I think that captures an element of exorcism
that is still intention today.
Is it from the world of magic
or is it something that belongs to the world of religion?
And I think the exorcism is something
which still today straddles those two worlds
of magic and religion.
And we know that ancient Jewish people
used to practice exorcism.
And of course Jesus himself practices exorcism
in the New Testament.
Although it's important to note that
Jesus' exorcisms don't involve swearing by God
because they are done through his own power
or his own claim to be the Son of God himself.
So they are different, for example,
from the exorcisms that are then conducted
by the apostles in the Acts of the Apostle
and in the Gospels themselves, sometimes by the apostles,
where they will claim to cast out an evil spirit from somebody
by the name of Jesus or by the power of Jesus.
So in other words, invoking Jesus as God
in order to perform this exorcism.
Exorcism in the way that we use it today
tends to have two different meanings at least.
And those two main meanings are, first of all,
ending the demonic possession of a person.
So the idea that a spirit has taken control of somebody
and is being driven out by those words of power.
And the second meaning, which I think is quite common
in the Church of England and in the UK,
is the sense that you are driving a spirit from a place.
So the idea of an exorcism of a haunted house essentially
where you're trying to get rid of ghosts
or you're trying to get rid of some kind of
unwelcome presence in a place.
And the church has practiced this from the beginning.
It's core to the Gospel narrative.
It's core to the practice of the early church.
It forms part of the liturgy of baptism.
So to this day, an exorcism is part of the liturgy of baptism
when a child is baptized in the Church of England
or in the Roman Catholic Church.
But that was essentially a kind of a ritualistic requirement
over time, lost its real significance.
But the exorcism of enigumins, that is to say,
demoniacs or people who are believed to be possessed
by the devil, that's something which comes back
with a vengeance in the late Middle Ages.
And it's something which is associated
with the witch trials as well.
The Reformation period, it becomes very, very popular claim.
Particularly you get the Catholic Church Protestants
counter-claiming and claiming.
They are the best at casting out demons.
And the Church of England's role in this
really kind of begins in that period
where there is an attempt to bring back the idea of exorcism
in the 1560s, early in Elizabeth's reign,
where some Church of England clergymen are saying,
well, we need to take on the Catholics at their own game.
We need to show that we've got the sacred power
to be able to vindicate our form of Christianity.
But there are others within the Church of England,
such as Archbishop Matthew Parker or John Fox,
who are deeply hostile to the idea of exorcism.
And they don't want this to be part of Anglican tradition.
And in fact, in 1604, the then Archbishop of Canterbury,
Richard Bancroft, draws up a series of canons,
which in all but name, prohibit exorcism
for the next couple of hundred years.
Theoretically, they allow an exorcism to take place
if the bishop is to use a specific license
that never happened.
No bishop ever did issue a specific license.
So effectively, that handed exorcism back
to the Roman Catholic Church
and to the dissenting free churches
who continued to practice it.
But the Church of England didn't.
And that situation continues right into the 20th century
until a priest called Gilbert Shaw,
who was an Anglo Catholic priest of Irish
and ancestry, decides to revive it
right in the middle of the blitz.
And he, in fact, carries out an exorcism of a woman
in a church in London in the middle of the war.
And after the war, he then trains up another protégé,
Max Petipier, Robert Petipier, who's later known,
who writes up essentially the foundational texts
of exorcism in the Church of England.
But people are still very skeptical of it.
And it has no official status until in 1969,
and that canon by Richard Bancroft of 1604 is abolished.
And effectively, that means that there is no law
within the Church of England, no canon
that is governing exorcism.
And that creates an absolute free for all.
So clergy can exorcise, they can do whatever they want.
If they so choose, you get televised exorcisms,
you get mass exorcisms in some churches.
It becomes a huge source of contention
until 1974, when a tragic case takes place
at Osset near Bradford, in Yorkshire,
where a man who was mentally ill
was given an exorcism which went wrong.
He then went back home, murdered his wife,
this terrible case, the Osset murder case, as it was known.
And as a result of that, the Church of England
decided that rules had to be imposed
were rather guidelines.
They were still couched as guidelines.
And in 1975, in General Synod, Archbishop Donald Coggan,
Archbishop of Canterbury, laid down
these basic guidelines for the governance of exorcism.
And essentially, it puts it in the hands of the bishop
to decide how exorcism is going to be done within their diocese.
It encourages the appointment of diocesan exorcist.
By the 1980s, that post had changed its name
and it tended to be known as a diocesan deliverance advisor.
Deliverance is the euphemism that the Church of England
prefers to use for exorcism these days.
And that person is appointed by the bishop
and can only act with the bishop's authorization.
Other clergy are required to refer any incidents
or anything that they think might require exorcism to that advisor.
And those guidelines have been refined.
So in 2012, and again, in 2024,
they were refined to their present status.
But, yeah, it remains a ministry
which the Church of England is quite cagey about
because I don't think they're keen for a great deal
of publicity about it, but absolutely it happens
and every diocese in the Church of England
all 42 dioceses has a diocesan deliverance advisor.
And is it controversial?
It sounds like it's had quite a rocky history
in the Church of England.
So as it stands today,
are there still people who regret the resurgence
of exorcism in the Church of England?
I think there are.
Yeah, so if you go back to 1975,
so in the period before Donald Coggan decided
to lay down these guidelines in general synod,
there was a campaign by Jeffrey Lamp and Donald Coupit
who were more liberal clergymen
within the Church of England of that era
to try and essentially retain
the Church of England's historic position
of not practicing exorcism,
but they were overruled.
And I think that the cultural pressures at that time
was such that there was huge demand for exorcism.
The film, the exorcist had only recently come out.
And exorcism was in the news
and the Church of England felt
that if it didn't offer this ministry to people,
they would be left behind.
And I think there's always an element
within the Church of England of tension
between responding to popular demand
and what people want and upholding
a kind of theological integrity or tradition
as it has been passed out.
And in this case,
I think it was the popular demand, which won out.
But of course, what that's done is it left the Church of England
in a position where this ministry now exists.
It can't really be got rid of now
because it's become an accepted thing that the C of E does.
And so yeah, there are certainly clergy who are skeptical
who don't want this to carry on
or are not so much skeptical,
but they find the practice of exorcism morally troubling.
And I think one issue which has come up in recent years
is how exorcism meshes
with the Church's requirements of safeguarding,
which of course requires the protection of vulnerable adults.
Any adult who says,
I believe that I'm possessed by a demon,
is it so faculty, whether that's true or not,
it's so facto that adult is a vulnerable person
because they're clearly in a position of believing something
that makes them very vulnerable to exploitation or to abuse.
And so I think that question is one which the Church of England
has struggled with, is still struggling with today.
How do you square the circle
of continuing the practice of exorcism
with the Church's commitment
to the safeguarding of vulnerable adults
and children, of course?
Critics of exorcism will often invoke child exorcisms.
There's an example of a kind of particularly abusive form
of practice.
Do you know of any examples of child exorcism
in the Church of England?
The Church of England a few years ago clearly clamp down
on this and prohibits the exorcism of any miners,
so it can't happen.
It would be impossible in the Church of England,
and if it did, it would be a very serious disciplinary offence
for any clergy who were involved.
Has it happened in the past?
Well, yes, I mean, between the early 1970s and now,
yes, there certainly were.
When I was researching for my book,
a history of Anglican exorcism,
I came across cases like this,
which I didn't include in the book for ethical reasons,
because those people might still be alive,
and therefore, even if anonymized,
that it would be ethically questionable
to report on those cases,
but in the archives that I was consulting,
there were cases of exorcism of children.
As far as I'm aware, none of the historic cases
of child abuse that have come up in the last few years
have concerned claims of exorcism,
which you might consider quite surprising,
but I think perhaps it shows that it's a fairly uncommon practice.
It, even in the height of this period,
of enthusiasm for exorcism,
there were only a few clergy who were doing this,
so it's not something which was ever, you know,
very common in the Church of England,
but yes, I think that they have historically been cases
of exorcism of children.
Are there any substantial differences
in the style of exorcism or the practice of exorcism
between what we see in the exorcist,
the Catholic version and the Anglican version?
What would an Anglican exorcism look like
as different to that Catholic version?
I think it depends on what tradition
within the Church of England you're talking about.
I mean, Gilbert, Sure, and Max Petapier,
who I mentioned, they came from an Anglic Catholic perspective,
so they were advocating and practicing
what I would characterize as the sacramental tradition
of exorcism, so heavily inspired
by the Roman ritual and the way in which exorcisms
are conducted in the Roman Catholic Church,
so kind of ritualistic.
Again, similar to what you might see in the exorcist,
although probably not as dramatic,
but there are, of course, other traditions
who are very keen on exorcism,
for example, charismatic, evangelical Christians,
so there the exorcism would still contain
those imperative form of words that kind of, you know,
begun Satan, you know,
begun in the name of Jesus and so forth,
but it would not be couched
within specific liturgical arrangements,
but would still be rooted in the reading of scripture
and things like that.
There are other traditions which are hostile to exorcism,
so traditionally the conservative evangelical tradition
within the Church of England tends to be hostile
to these kind of charismatic expressions
or enthusiastic expressions of spirituality like exorcism,
so you wouldn't find conservative evangelicals
very much in favor of exorcism.
And again, within the sort of the soft center,
if you like the Church of England,
the kind of liberal mainstream,
this is something which you won't always find,
although sometimes you will,
from a therapeutic point of view,
you will find people who will advocate the idea
that even if they're not sure
where the exorcism really does anything on a spiritual level,
they might say, well, if somebody wants it
and they feel that it is beneficial to them
and to their mental health and well-being,
then it could be one among a variety of approaches
that the Church takes towards someone's psychological healing.
So I don't think you necessarily have to be an avowed believer
in the demonic world,
necessarily think that exorcism is a good thing,
and so you will find a kind of liberal tradition
of exorcism as well within the modern Church of England.
Surely there are some more people now
who believe in demonic possession than there were,
given the sudden rise in interest in exorcism,
is it true that people are now considering
the possibility of demonic or satanic possession
where they weren't before, where they were more skeptical?
Yes, I think so.
I think that there is a comparison to be made
between our current era and the 1970s,
the 1970s being a decade,
when there was a huge upsurge of interest in the occult
and in the possibility of spiritual forces beyond our kin.
And I think that that's something which has experienced
a bit of a revival, actually.
I think that there is a, yeah,
a kind of a turn away from the kind of rationalistic way
of looking at the world that we might have seen
in the 80s and 90s and early 2000s.
And you see this also among clergy,
I think younger clergy tend to be quite serious
about the supernatural in the same way
that they're quite serious about their faith.
You know, you won't find younger clergy in the Church of England
who don't believe in the resurrection of Jesus Christ
or who don't believe in miracles.
And that would be rare, I think.
You know, mostly they are quite serious.
And I think that that's a result of religion being
a conscious choice.
You know, if you're going to be a Christian,
if you're going to be religious,
that's quite a cultural thing to be in our society.
And so if you're going to do it,
you might as well do the full fat version.
And I think that a lot of younger clergy therefore
tend to be quite keen on the idea of theological authenticity.
Now that doesn't necessarily mean
that they're all big on demons,
but it does mean that there is a space within which
it's possible to be quite serious
about the threat posed by the demonic world.
Given that you're someone who's over the kind of trends
in the mystical, the spiritual,
is there anything else that has resurged
or become popular at the same time that exesent have?
Yeah, well, I think that it is something which is paralleled
in other spiritual traditions,
a kind of resurgence of interest in the supernatural.
For example, you know, there's growing numbers of people
who would identify as contemporary pagans.
You've got growing numbers of people
who would identify with occult practices
or spiritual practices without necessarily joining a group.
And I think, you know, with the rise of TikTok
and social media and that the idea that you can simply
find out what's going on out there
but without joining something.
That's a new development.
You know, if you go back to the 1970s,
if you wanted to know about this stuff usually,
you had to sort of sign up by mail order and find out,
you know, join a society or get initiated into something
and, you know, join a group.
And I think, you know, people are very averse
to that kind of, you know, belonging to groups,
especially post-COVID.
And yet there is this new space in which it's possible
to, you know, find out about all sorts of stuff.
And so clergy themselves will say that, you know,
a lot of the people who are asking for help
have got in trouble as a result of something
which they, you know, saw on YouTube or saw on TikTok
and they tried at home and then they became disturbed
by, you know, some perceived kind of spiritual influence
that resulted from that.
And so there is this kind of spiritual marketplace out there
which is pretty chaotic.
And it, yeah, it causes some people quite a lot of distress.
This episode is sponsored by the new film, October 8th.
October 8th offers a look at the real life impacts
of October 7th on the lives of Jewish people
and the eruption of anti-semitism on college campuses,
social media, and in the streets of America,
beginning the day after the attack on Israel by Hamas.
The film also uncovers how, over decades,
Hamas created sophisticated networks in America
to permeate US institutions and examines the tsunami
of online anti-semitism and disinformation unleashed
by Iran, China and Russia.
With the goal of dividing American society.
The film features expert insights from the likes
of Barry Weiss and Douglas Murray.
This is a vital wake-up call
about the threat of extremism against democracy.
And October 8th is now available
to buy or rent on Hamas and Prime Apple TV and YouTube.
This is a Monday.com ad.
The same Monday.com helping people worldwide
getting work done faster and better.
The same Monday.com designed for every team
and every industry.
The same Monday.com with built-in AI,
scaling your work from day one.
The same Monday.com, the your team will actually love using.
The same Monday.com with an easy and intuitive setup.
Go to Monday.com and try it for free.
Yes, the same Monday.com.
When people talk about energy, recovery, and performance,
they usually jump straight to training, protein, or supplements.
But one of the most overlooked pieces is gut health.
If your gut is not dialed,
everything else struggles to work the way it should.
That is where momentous fiber plus comes in.
When gut health is not dialed in,
other supplements and training habits don't work as well.
You can be doing everything else right,
but without a strong foundation, results fall short.
Fiber is often the missing link.
That's why momentous believes in a relentless commitment
to fundamentals and doing them differently
than they have ever been done.
Fiber plus is built to support the entire gut health process,
not just one piece of it.
And if a product doesn't meet their standard,
it never hits the shelves.
Right now, momentous is offering our listeners
up to 35% off your first order with promo code Acast.
Head to live momentous.com and use promo code Acast
for up to 35% off your first order.
That's live momentous.com promo code Acast.
Hey, moms and dads.
If you're tired of getting the deer and the headlights response
every time you bring up family plans with your kids,
let me introduce you to your new best friend,
the Skylight Calendar.
Skylight Calendar was designed to help you
manage the chaos of family life.
Ditch the mental load of juggling everyone's schedules
by pulling it all into one clear space.
This all-in-one smart touchscreen calendar
brings visual structure and color coding
across your schedules, tasks, lists,
and other family needs.
Right now, Skylight is offering our listeners
$30 off their 15-inch calendars
by going to myskylight.com slash get30.
Go to myskylight.com slash get30
for $30 off your 15-inch calendar.
That is m-y-s-k-y-l-i-g-h-t.com slash get30.
You mentioned COVID there.
Why was it the zenith of this explosion
of alternative spirituality?
I think that it's simply that people had time on their hands
to reflect on the meaning of things
and on the spiritual or on the unseen.
And people also spent a lot of time in their own homes
in one particular space.
And so, for example, there was a huge upsurge
of people reporting haunted houses
simply because they were spending so much time
in their homes that they were becoming aware
of things which they interpreted as a presence
of a spiritual haunting.
But I think also, you know, the same way
that people have turned to conspiracy theories
or they've turned to alternative spiritualities
as a result of spending a bit too much time online.
It's a big pandemic.
So, you know, people have developed
these kind of spiritual speculations
and had the space and the time to reflect on these things
which in some cases has been a good thing.
In other cases, it has caused people pain and distress
and led them down pathways which they now regret.
But yeah, I think it was a kind of a strange time
when people turned inward
and therefore it has had these kind of spiritual consequences.
What might this moment suggest about where we're going?
Have there been points like this in history
where exorcism has suddenly become really trendy again?
Where do you think we might be headed
if we are having a sudden revival of interest in exorcism?
Yeah, well, I've argued in my books
that exorcism is associated with crisis
and it peaks in times of crisis for the church.
The reformation being a notable example of that,
you know, again, around the time of the French Revolution,
you know, you've got a peak of exorcism there
with a kind of a crisis in identity
for Christianity and the church.
And I think we see the same thing in the 1970s
when again, the church is finding an identity for itself
in a rapidly secularizing society.
And I think that there is a crisis point for the church now
in the sense that secularization has to some extent
ground to a halt.
It no longer appears as those secularization
will just continue forever and consume Christianity.
It seems that religion is making a bit of a comeback,
but at the same time, it is forced to find
a new identity for itself in a religious marketplace
where people are not necessarily
schooled in one particular religion
and they don't have that background
and they can choose whatever they want.
You know, anything's out there for you to adopt
if you choose to do so.
And therefore Christianity is competing
with other religions and other spiritual traditions
for hearts and minds and spirits
that the church itself would believe.
And so, yeah, I think that there is a sense of crisis,
of uncertainty about the future of, you know,
potential, you know, positive futures for the church
where church attendance grows,
whether it's kind of a revival,
but also concerns about dwindling congregations
and declining churches and declining national influence
when it comes to the Church of England.
And with the Church of England,
I always get the sense that it clings to exorcism
as one way to make itself relevant
to deliver a service, if you like,
to the population of England,
which no one else can deliver in quite the same way.
And therefore, that's one of the lynch pins
that kind of keeps exorcism in place
as something which the Church of England offers.
Great, Francis, thank you so much.
I really appreciate your time.
You see the headlines every day,
but do they actually tell you what's going on?
We don't just look at the front pages.
We look at what's moving beneath the surface.
That's undercurrents,
the new daily newsletter from Unheard.
It lands in your inbox every morning at 8am EST or 1pm GMT.
Get the perspective that really matters.
Get undercurrents.
By me, James Billow in the US Newsroom.
Sign up today at unheard.com
forward slash undercurrents-newsletter.
Next up, we are going to be joined
by Reverend Dr. Jason Bray,
somebody who has actually performed exorcisms
or as he calls them deliverances
as Dean of Landf and a Deliverance Minister.
He's an Anglican priest and he joins us from his home now.
Could you just share how one gets into performing exorcisms?
It's not something we usually associate with the Anglican Church.
We all know that the exorcist is about Catholic priests.
So how do you as an Anglican priest end up performing exorcisms?
We tend to call it deliverance ministry,
but what we tend to do is we deal with the paranormal.
And most of us get into it by having some sort of experience.
In my case, it was an experience that happened
actually in my own home.
So it was the house that we moved into
when I was a curate.
And we just had a whole series of weird experiences
happening there.
And I realized that actually maybe this was the thing
that I really needed to explore.
And so what's a normal act of deliverance like?
If you're called out for a deliverance job,
what does it look like?
What are you doing?
What we're doing is basically inviting
God in a sort of quite elaborate way
to deal with the situation.
When a call comes in, it goes actually,
the first thing it does, it goes to the bishops
so it can be logged for insurance purposes.
So we're ensured by our bishops.
And then the case will come back to us
and we have conversations with people
usually on the phone first, go out to see them
and try to work out what's going on.
One of the things that we always try to do
is to sort of bless the house, bless them maybe.
So that will involve blessing holy water.
So you bless the water, you bless salt,
mix them together, and then we,
so sprinkle holy water around the house,
come back, say the Lord's Prayer,
also providing a huge amount of reassurance
while we're doing it.
What are the most common reasons
for requiring or requesting deliverance services?
Why do people need these deliverances?
There are things to do with houses.
So people see stuff around the house
and stuff moves around.
So pulting iced activity is a really common thing.
Often associated with children, with teenagers,
with people who aren't very good at opening up about things,
people going through stress.
And we reckon that it's probably an extreme stress reaction
that somehow things build up
and that they earth themselves in physical objects.
So what we need to do in that case
is to provide huge amounts of reassurance
and, so to say, also bless the house as well.
And then occasionally people will see things around
anti-brander keeps appearing on the landing upstairs
in her 90s when she really shouldn't be there.
She died 10 years ago.
So that's something that we also deal with.
I also get lots of calls.
So people are asking me to exercise them properly
because they're demonically possessed.
What would be the threshold to reach a point
where you would say, yes, we will perform an exorcism?
What symptoms might someone have that suggests
that they are a good candidate for exorcism then?
What I'm actually looking for
is three very specific things.
So we're looking for somebody who has preternatural strength.
So basically if they can do things
that they really shouldn't physically be able to do,
that's one.
The second thing would be preternatural knowledge
of stuff that they shouldn't know.
So if you walk in and somebody knows your browsing history,
and those you've got gambling addiction,
those you've got wife and family somewhere
that you're not telling your present life and family
about all that sort of stuff.
If they know that, that might be another symptom.
The other one is a weird knowledge of languages
that they've never studied.
One of the cases that somebody reported
was there was a little old lady who lived in Cornwall.
She never left Cornwall.
She lived there for the whole of her life.
She was able to speak colloquial Arabic.
The deliverance minister was able to say,
actually, yeah, I studied Arabic and this is,
you know, from Upper Egypt.
So we're looking, ideally for all three of those things,
each diocese in England and Wales.
And there are 48, I think, dioceses in England and Wales
would have a team of people that would go out and do these things.
What does it tell us about the change
in the way people are perceiving Christianity
that does seem to be more demand for exorcism
or deliverance in this current moment?
Are we moving backwards in a kind of timeline of Christianity?
Or is this just a new phase?
There is something happening.
So all the research seems to suggest
that people are much more interested in religion
and are much more interested in some of those aspects
of religion that the Anglican Church
really hasn't been good at explaining.
You know, the supernatural healings are, you know,
sort of things that people are looking for.
They're looking for authenticity and authenticity
in spiritual experience as well.
There does seem to be a sort of change
in this current generation, generation Z,
in that sort of looking for something
that they're looking for meaning somewhere along the line.
I suppose the other whole idea with the supernatural
and the paranormal is something that's actually,
yeah, become much more acceptable in today's world.
Previous generations, certainly Christians
haven't helped themselves.
So I was reading an article earlier on today that said,
well, Christians today don't believe in the supernatural.
In fact, most Christians today don't believe in God.
They just believe in being nice to people.
And I think we've moved away from that sort of idea.
Christians today are much more likely to be up front
about the fact that they believe in God
as an external entity,
but also much more interested in some of those deeper questions
that we've sort of lost sight of over the years.
I'm gonna ask you the really cheeky question.
I'm sure you get asked at every dinner party you go to,
which is what's the most kind of memorable deliverance job
that you've been on?
Somebody got in touch with me and told me that her mum
was experiencing something utterly weird.
So she could feel rats under the bed clothes
when she went to bed at night.
In fact, she felt that the rats were actually eating her insides.
Her daughter would go in and they could almost see them
seething under the bed clothes,
but they couldn't really understand what was going on.
When they took the bed clothes off, there was nothing there.
And when I caught there, they were really uptight.
There was something going on there I couldn't work out.
So I laid out my salt, my holy water in their kitchen.
And I was standing there just saying the prayers
when the light started to go off one by one above me.
So went around, blessed the house, blessed them,
said some prayers for them and just sort of walked away
and thought, this is a bit weird.
The daughter came up to me and said,
thank you very much for coming round.
Just to let you know that mum is waiting for a diagnosis
for bowel cancer.
She's just had some tests,
but she didn't want to tell you about that
because she's a bit embarrassed about the whole thing.
And it was just sort of one of those cases
where I thought, actually that's probably what's going on.
But somehow, sort of her anxiety about her bowel cancer,
which you couldn't really talk about,
had manifested itself in the physical sensation
of rats eating her.
And then when they looked at the bed clothes
and they could see the rats actually moving around.
Interestingly enough, I bumped into the daughter
a little while afterwards and she said,
just to let, you know, moments of the all clear,
it wasn't, it wasn't that at all.
And she said, and the rats have gone as well.
We're speaking to other experts on exorcism
and deliverance today just to get different perspectives.
And one of their concerns about the rise in interest
in exorcism is the way in which it is not evenly spread
across cultures and that some religious traditions
have, let's say, looser practices
when it comes to the ethics.
Is there a risk to the sudden uptake
and enthusiasm around exorcism in this country
where not everything is regulated in the way
that the Anglican Church is?
Yes, I think there is, actually,
because exorcism, as such, the expelling of a demon
will only work if there is a demon present.
So as I said, you know, we are looking
for those three very specific things.
They are remarkably rare.
But it would be really easy for me to still get in touch
with people and say, yeah, yeah,
I can round out here, quick exorcism.
Well, I know perfectly well that it's not going to work.
So yeah, we are deeply concerned about these things.
The whole idea of conversion therapy as well, you know,
they're sort of expelling demons of homosexuality
from people that's not a form of demonic possession.
So it simply won't work.
You can go online, you can get a got online exorcisms.
There is also a mental health epidemic out there
and in a sensitive treating mental health
as if it's a paranormal thing,
events just simply not going to work at all.
Do you think that potentially we are looking down
a track of a future which involves
much more religious esoteric?
Is this a new direction that we are headed or is it a phase
that we're going to kind of come out of
in the way that there have been many faces in the past?
It is remarkably difficult to tell.
So nobody was expecting this to happen.
The Bible Society produced a report called
The Quite Revival because they were quite surprised
by what they were seeing.
And in a sense, we weren't expecting this
so we don't know how it's going to go.
And it's possible that there will be an increase
in interest in spirituality.
For me, I feel that there needs to be a balance
between doctrine, between what the church believes
and also the teachings of Jesus,
they're sort of love and community teachings
and also the spirituality that underpins it all.
I think it's all part and part of the same thing.
So maybe this is a way of recapturing some of the
spirituality that the church had in the past
but has lost that who knows where we go from here.
I think that's a good point.
And thank you, Jason.
I really appreciate it.
And last but not least, we're going to be joined
by Professor Helen Hall and Associate Professor
at Nottingham Law School.
She is going to help us understand the landscape
of contemporary Britain and its exorcisms
because it isn't just the Church of England
that's had a resurgence in interest.
There has also been much evidence that other faiths
are engaging in this practice as well
and sometimes without the guardrails
that the Church of England offers.
She joins us now.
Welcome, Professor Helen.
Hi, I'm Darina, co-founder of Quo.
If you run a business, you know the team
that responds first wins the customer.
You've probably opened your phone
to a bunch of missed calls and no voicemails.
Those are missed opportunities
and exactly why we built Quo.
Quo is the business phone system
that helps your team handle every colon text right away.
Join over 90,000 businesses
that win more customers with Quo.
Try Quo for free at quote.com slash tech.
That's qo.com slash tech.
When people talk about energy, recovery,
and performance, they usually jump straight
to training, protein, or supplements.
But one of the most overlooked pieces is gut health.
If your gut is not dialed, everything else struggles
to work the way it should.
That is where momentous fiber plus comes in.
When gut health is not dialed in,
other supplements and training habits don't work as well.
You can be doing everything else right,
but without a strong foundation, results fall short.
Fiber is often the missing link.
That's why momentous believes in a relentless commitment
to fundamentals and doing them differently
than they have ever been done.
Fiber plus is built to support
the entire gut health process, not just one piece of it.
And if a product doesn't meet their standard,
it never hits the shelves.
Right now, momentous is offering our listeners
up to 35% off your first order with promo code Acast.
Head to livemomentus.com and use promo code Acast
for up to 35% off your first order.
That's livemomentus.com promo code Acast.
I suppose we should start with the obvious,
which is do you concur with the evidence
that seems to suggest that there is a rise
in interest in exorcisms in this country
and in fact across Europe and America?
I think that has definitely been a rise in the amount
that we've talked about and seen of exorcisms.
And that's really been a continual trend
with some ups and downs,
but from the sort of 60s and 70s onwards,
when there were some notorious, of course,
the exorcist but various other well-known
sort of blockbuster films,
the whole phenomenon of the satanic panic,
which hasn't gone anywhere.
There was basically a conspiracy theory
that has been completely debunked
by every reputable commentator of real supposed cult
that were meant to be sacrificing children to satan
and things like that.
And that's unfortunately circled back around
into things like the QAnon conspiracy.
So it's been in the popular culture for a long time.
And of course, we've had COVID
where people have had a lot longer to spend time
on the internet and exchanging and finding ideas.
We also live in a more multicultural society now
than we did previously.
So that's had an influence on the kinds of exorcism
that are being practiced.
Traditionally speaking for a lot of the history
of the Church of England,
it wasn't a mainstream part of Church of England practice
for quite a lot of centuries.
So it was something that was practiced more
from other groups.
It's always been part of, for instance,
a lot of Islamic traditions
have exorcism.
And obviously a greater diversity of society
has meant that we have seen different groups,
of course, in a different way.
We've seen a rise in things like neo-paganism,
alternative spiritualities
are being practiced more as well.
So we have these new religious streams going along
as well as greater access to information.
What is it then that has caused British Anglicans
who previously might not have sought out an exorcist
to look for one?
It has always been something
that has been permitted with an Anglican tradition.
So the Anglican Church
took a very stereotypical fence-sitting kind of position
on it at the Reformation,
where we basically said,
well, it's not something we do routinely,
but if you get permission from the bishop
then you can do it.
So it's never been a completely alien thing.
And it has been something that we've offered increasingly.
I mean, with an Anglicanism,
we've always been very careful about how we've done it.
And we've always done it within consultation
with medical professionals.
We've always been very careful
to have proper safeguarding and guidelines around things,
at least since some incidents in the 1970s.
And we want to make sure that if we do offer this,
we do it in a very responsible and considered way
because if it's done without proper thought,
you can inadvertently do a great deal of damage to people
because if somebody has a mental illness
and you encourage them in the narrative
that actually what's going on with them is a demon
and your exorcism is not going to cure an illness
like schizophrenia,
you can just make them even more distressed
than they were previously
because you've encouraged them to believe
that this is something demonic.
You fail to help and you leave them with the idea
well, now I'm at the mercy of this demon
and nobody even the church seem able to help.
In terms of people's welfare,
there is a real risk in carelessly carrying out exorcism.
As there is societal question here
around the way in which we care for people
with mental health problems
that lead to those kind of delusions.
I mean, I certainly think we are much more able
to talk about our struggles
than we were in previous generations
and maybe even 10 or 15 years ago.
And people do that in different ways,
put things across in different ways
and I think willingness to say,
I have a problem, I'm frightened
that I can't have an impact.
Sometimes as well, people might have had
a negative experience of conventional medicine.
There is a lot of suspicion around conventional medicine
and a lot of unhelpful conspiracy theories.
And in the same way,
some people might choose to reject vaccines,
they might also want to reject psychiatric care
because they don't trust science
and the medical establishment as much.
So that could be another reason why some people
are seeking alternative explanations
and alternative ways of dealing with problems.
Why do people seem to be turning away
from mainstream religiosity and biblical texts
and turning towards these alternative texts,
alternative spiritual practices?
What can that tell us about the society we're in?
I mean, it's really interesting.
I mean, obviously there's been a sort of slow decline
in participation in organized religion
in the last sort of 200 years or so.
Although the narrative of its decline and death
has definitely been exaggerated
in that it's, I think, quite a lot of people
at the beginning of the 19th century
thought that churches will all have shriveled up
and died a long time ago.
Also, we have lots of fascinating evidence
from historians, including historians
of the relatively recent past,
that people have always sought out alternative spiritualities
cunning folk, for instance,
people within their local communities, even in urban areas.
So people have often stereotyped ideas
of kind of like, you know, which type of figures
and villages in the distant past.
But often even in urban areas in the late 1930, 20th century,
you got people who in exchange for money or favors
might be willing to tell your fortune, for instance,
might be willing to effectively curse
somebody who'd upset you.
So this isn't, all of a sudden,
people have started doing these out there
things that they weren't doing in the past.
It's always been there.
I think it's become more acceptable
to be interested in alternative spiritualities.
I think for a lot of the 20th century,
that would have been seen as, you know,
a bit socially shameful and embarrassing.
I think maybe people just feel a little bit more
of a permission to explore other things now.
Does Phil striking the old school, though,
the kind of vision of the priest turning up
at the house of the demonically possessed?
Is the modern exorcism what I'm imagining?
It's definitely not like that.
In the sense of, certainly with an Anglicanism
and to be fair also within Roman Catholicism,
I think that's important to emphasize.
A priest would not just turn up at somebody's house
to turn that they were possessed by a demon
and then start shouting at them in Latin.
Basically, that's not what really happens.
There would be a great deal of conversation beforehand
trying to work out what was going on.
Most of the time, we would conclude that actually,
this is not something that's appropriate for an exorcism.
We would encourage people to try and seek out medical care
and possibly other therapies and ways forward
that might be right for them.
If we did, in either case, decide that exorcism
might be appropriate, that would be sense checked
with other experts within the church.
It wouldn't be something that just somebody
would go off as a maverick and do.
And it would be done in a very gentle, calm way
with the minimum of publicity.
It's fair to say, though, that other religious traditions
do things differently and have different approaches.
And there are some Christians, for instance,
and there are others from other traditions who'd say,
well, we have to respond.
And our narrative is that this person is genuinely
in the grip of an evil spirit.
And it was the right thing to do.
And basically, yes, I am a hero in this situation.
And what I did is an accordance with my religious beliefs.
It's an accordance with the religious beliefs
with the person who received it.
And who were you to question the validity of that?
And this is a really difficult question.
And it's one of the things that a lot of my research
is concerned about, really.
How do we balance on the one hand respecting individual freedom
and saying, people have a right to practice
whatever faithful spirituality they want to?
Doesn't matter if other people think it's weird.
They have that dignity and that freedom
as adults in a liberal democracy.
From on the other hand, saying, but we
don't permit vulnerable people to be abused and manipulated.
And at what point is it right for us to come in and intervene?
And obviously, the fear of cultural insensitivity
plays a part here in that if you've
got a multi-ethnic society in which
different religions have connections to different communities,
then the government might be wary of jumping in
and trying to intervene in what could potentially
be an abusive or exploitative situation
because of those cultural sensitivities.
Is that something you find in your research?
Yes, it is.
And it's a really difficult thing.
There are instances of it going wrong both ways.
In the sense of there are instances
of things being perceived as problematic or dangerous
or worrying when actually within a particular culture,
they are just accepted and relatively normal parts of life.
And on the other hand, there are instances
of intervention not happening.
I mean, the most tragic and one of the most
high profile was the death of a little girl
called Victoria Kimbea at the beginning of the 21st century.
And she was murdered by family members
in an informal fostering arrangement
that she was living with her great aunt and the partner
of this woman.
And they effectively tortured and killed the little girl.
Now, there was a lot going on in the situation.
There were a lot of child protection failures at the time.
But part of their narrative, what they were doing,
had to do with cultural beliefs about spirit possession,
essentially.
One of the reasons why the authorities
didn't intervene in a timely way and didn't save this little girl
was a failure to understand and a fear of being perceived
as racist or culturally insensitive.
But unfortunately, this backfires horribly
and this little girl isn't saved in circumstances
where perhaps a white child would have been
because at a much earlier point,
someone might have been willing to say,
this is alarming, this isn't appropriate here.
And so when these people in positions of authority
who should have noticed that this was going on saw the signs,
they actually projected their own vision
of what was normal in this culture
as being an element of the religious zealousness
of that household was that the abuse
was kind of downstream from that
and therefore to intervene in that situation
would be to be insensitive to the culture
of the people in that house.
Yes, basically they made assumptions
and they projected their own fears and ideas
of what was going on and therefore didn't correctly
make the judgment call.
I think it's fair to say that there has been
a lot of learning since then.
Certainly, various police forces have done a lot of work
trying to train professionals.
I think the social work profession has done a lot of work.
There was a national working group
on spiritual and ritual abuse which was set up
which is still carrying on which I'm still involved with.
So we have made a lot of effort
in the last quarter of a century
to try and avoid such tragedies.
However, is spiritual and ritual abuse still a problem?
Absolutely it is and there is still definitely work to be done.
And what do you think that work is?
Like what do you think the next stages are
in terms of safeguarding young people,
vulnerable people in communities where demonic possession
might actually just be a good excuse
to enact abuse or exploitation on them?
I think a lot of it has to do with education and empowerment.
So I think getting faith communities on board
to ensure that good safeguarding
is treated as something that's important across the board,
across faith and spiritualities and traditions.
I'm in favor of encouraging voluntary guidelines
on exorcism that perhaps could be taken up across the board.
I also think it's very important to educate people
of all ages but including young people
so that they can spot red flags.
If somebody is offering you some kind of spiritual intervention,
how is it being offered, for instance,
are they encouraging you to carry on talking to other people
to family members?
Are they encouraging you to carry on going to your GP?
Or are they doing things which make you feel uncomfortable?
Really it's part of a bigger conversation
of empowering individuals to recognize when things aren't right
and to feeling it's a appropriate question
and knowing where to seek help if they need to do that.
Great, Helen, thank you so much.
I really appreciate it.
Well, there you have it.
Three experts on exorcism giving us some reasons
why there might have been an uptick since the pandemic,
in interest, in spiritual deliverance.
If you are interested in this sort of esoteric content,
then why not subscribe to the Unheard channel?
There'll be plenty more where this came from.
Thanks for watching. This was Unheard.
Craving the coffee flavor you love.
But without the caffeine,
kachava's got you covered with their newest coffee flavor.
This all-in-one nutrition shake delivers bold,
authentic flavor, crafted from premium,
decaffeinated Brazilian beans with 25 grams of protein,
six grams of fiber, greens, and so much more.
Treat yourself to the flavor and nutrition your body craves.
Go to kachava.com and use code smoothie.
New customers get 15% off their first order.
That's kac, hav.com, code smoothie.
Acast powers the world's best podcast.
Here's the show that we recommend.
Do you like being educated on things that entertain
but don't matter?
Well, then you need to be listening
to the podcast with Nox and Jamie.
Everyone's day, we put together an episode dedicated
to delightful idiocy to give your brain a break
from all the serious and important stuff.
Whether we're deep diving a classic movie,
dissecting the true meanings behind the newest slang,
or dunking on our own listeners.
So they're bad takes or cringy stories.
We always approach our topics with humor
and just a little bit of side eye.
And we end every episode with recommendations
on all the best new movies, books, TV shows, or music.
To find out more, just search up the podcast with Nox and Jamie
where ever you listen to podcasts and prepare
to make Wednesday your new favorite day of the week.
Acast helps creators launch, grow,
and monetize their podcasts everywhere.
acast.com.
Click on the link in the description below.



