The Case For Striking Iran Over Nukes Falls Apart

Chris Cuomo breaks down the central claim driving the U.S. response to Iran: that the regime was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon. Drawing on recent reporting and statements from international watchdogs, Cuomo argues that the timeline being presented publicly does not match the underlying facts. He explains the critical distinction between enriched uranium and a deployable nuclear weapon, and why conflating the two creates a sense of urgency that may not be justified. If the threat is as immediate as claimed, Cuomo asks, why stop short of removing the regime entirely? And if it isn't, what actually drove the decision to act now — and whether domestic pressures at home had more to do with the timing than the threat itself. Cuomo also examines the broader consequences of the strike: strained alliances, unclear objectives, and the risk of getting pulled deeper into a conflict without a defined endgame. He argues that the current approach delivers limited strategic benefit while increasing long-term costs, both abroad and at home. Join The Chris Cuomo Project on YouTube for ad-free episodes, early releases, exclusive access to Chris, and more: https://www.youtube.com/@chriscuomo/join Follow and subscribe to The Chris Cuomo Project on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes every Tuesday and Thursday: https://linktr.ee/cuomoproject Ready to reach your goals? Visit https://hims.com/CCP to get a personalized, affordable plan that gets you. Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at https://shopify.com/chrisc. Get 25% off Cowboy Colostrum with code CUOMO at https://www.cowboycolostrum.com/CUOMO Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices