0:00
I guess our own personal ambition is beyond the confines of the way it's been sold to us or
0:07
told to us, been positioned as how it should be. Particularly for women, I think the conversation
0:15
around ambition is so often framed as a trade-off between your public life and your private life,
0:22
between your personal and your professional. And I even see even in like very progressive
0:28
circles this implicit assumption that to succeed in one domain is to give up another. But that's
0:37
only position that way for women. This is not position this way for men.
0:44
This is the brown way to money podcast where women of color and business find their financial
0:50
independence. Where do you think is that key element for women to pay attention now in the next
0:58
decade to build wealth? I think the most important thing we need to do is contextualize our own
1:06
experiences within the experiences of all women or all women of color or the other larger
1:13
contextual groups that we are all respectively part of because what I see happening right now
1:19
is that we have all been so conditioned to internalize what happens to us as a personal failing.
1:27
And that is because we have been brought up on these messages that our biggest barriers to
1:32
opportunity are ourselves, our willingness to ask for more or even save or invest. But what we
1:40
have learned over the course of certainly the last decade, but a much broader history is that
1:46
the forces that are happening beyond us are much much greater than what we can they have much more
1:53
influence than what we do as individuals. Now this is not to say that there's nothing we can do
1:59
on an individual basis to improve our prospects and certainly to build wealth, but it is to acknowledge
2:06
the influence and how big that influence is of these external factors and to again contextualize
2:14
what is happening to us within this broader cultural, political, institutional framework so that we're
2:22
not turning inward self-blaming and then disengaging because we feel shame or because we feel like
2:30
we're just not up to the challenge or we think that it says something about who we are or what we're
2:35
capable of in terms of what we can build or sustain. But rather we connect with other people who
2:42
are going through similar experiences to understand that this is something that we are experiencing
2:48
collectively as women and that collective experience is something we can also leverage in fighting
2:56
back because when we are not isolated and turning inward with self-blame, we can reach out to
3:02
other people who are sharing our experiences. We can find their support we need, we can find
3:07
tools we can find resources and we can come together to take action against some of these things
3:14
that feel beyond our control whether that's policies that are being passed maybe not on a federal
3:20
level but certainly you know in the most micro level like within our own workplaces, within our
3:25
own communities, within our own localities, the town, cities, right. When I say that I'm talking
3:32
about these bigger systemic ideas, these bigger systemic influences and how much we have underestimated
3:38
their impact, people often think well you know if it's just the system what can I really do about it.
3:44
But a system is operating at so many levels you know it's operating at the scale of an interpersonal
3:50
relationship between bosses and mentors and husbands and wives and friends partners. It's happening
3:57
at that scale, it's happening at an institutional scale which is like a workplace or school or
4:02
community and it's then happening at the larger political and cultural level. So just because you're
4:07
not operating at like the highest macro scale doesn't mean there's nothing you can do at these
4:14
other levels and I think the process of affecting change at the bigger levels really requires us
4:21
reconnecting to that broader shared experience at this at these smaller levels at the interpersonal
4:27
levels that building our communities and realizing that what it's going to take to build our wealth
4:33
isn't just about what we're doing individually but how we're working together in community to push
4:39
back against these bigger forces. I like to double done on that what you just said that
4:45
the system tends to make wealth building and financial problems an individual problem an
4:52
individual problem that is a sprinkle with shame and guilt if you don't know better.
4:58
What have you found and all of the research that you have done and threw you on book that has been
5:04
the biggest systematic narrative that affects the most at an individual level for women. I just
5:11
want to make sure I really understand what you're asking is the question what is like the biggest
5:17
systemic thing that is impeding our ability to grow up with the narratives. So things like the biggest
5:24
myth of women are not good with money. Right so that narrative beyond this the systematic things
5:33
that we know we have right. Yeah go ahead. Yeah I would say that so much of what enables
5:40
these kinds of wealth inequalities to continue reproducing themselves really relies on a lot of
5:47
myth making. So myths like you said this idea that women aren't just good with money that's just
5:53
one of them. I couldn't say what the biggest myth is and all of this but I think it's a general theme
5:58
that women aren't confident women don't invest women don't care about wealth women aren't
6:04
interested in pursuing high-paying careers you know I could go on and on and on but all of this
6:09
is a level of myth making that is not actually grounded in data the data does and this is something
6:16
I dig into in detail in my book it's it's a lot of going through each of these arguments
6:21
and showing people actually that's not true but more than that to your point is what do these
6:28
myths enable and there's a really great study that looks specifically at the myths that women
6:34
don't negotiate their salaries as much as their male peers now this is very commonly assumed
6:39
even though it has not been true in the United States for just about two decades women have been
6:44
more likely to negotiate their salaries than their male peers for about two decades at this point
6:50
and yet the myth that women don't ask is still chronically used to justify gender pay inequity.
6:57
Women just aren't paid as much because they don't ask for more so not only is that not true
7:02
but the researchers found that people who believe that myth are also more likely to blame women
7:09
for their own underpayment and they are less likely to support policies and legislation that are
7:16
proven to reduce gender pay gaps like pay transparency initiatives so I think that research really
7:24
really speaks to the power and the harm of these myths because what happens when you buy into
7:32
this idea that women's greatest barrier to wealth building to economic opportunity not just women
7:38
everyone who's marginalized when you buy into this myth that the inability to build wealth is an
7:43
individual problem and an individual problem alone you become more likely to double down on
7:49
the policies that ensure those outcomes reproduce themselves because if you don't have
7:55
pay a commitment to pay equity if you don't have a commitment to transparency and true performance
8:00
based rewards and not ideas of performance based rewards then you will continue to reproduce
8:07
the same inequality as we've experienced even as other more explicit bans or restrictions fall
8:14
away and again this is something I really document in detail in my book I just I know I'm going
8:18
on and on and on but I want to give a quick example of this there's a really great paper where
8:25
they were hiring for the role of a police chief and there were applicants and the study participants
8:34
had to decide okay who was going to get hired for this role of police chief and they would compare a
8:39
male applicant and a female applicant and what would happen is if the applicant had a college degree
8:47
and they were a man then the study participants would say well we really should hire this guy not
8:52
because he is a man but because he has a college degree so he's more qualified but when it was
8:58
reversed and it was the woman who had the college degree what the study participants did would say
9:04
well we should hire the guy even though he has less education because college education really
9:09
isn't really relevant for this job and so we need someone who has like the street smarts and so
9:15
this is a really good example of the way inequality reproduces itself while kind of
9:22
masquerading as a meritocracy and how you can continue to generate the same unequal outcomes even
9:29
as you don't have people admitting to the fact that they're discriminating but they clearly are
9:35
what do you think are some of those three steps that women should be not only paying attention but
9:43
actually kind of like aiming to do towards reclaiming that agency with money because when I talk
9:51
about financial trauma the first thing that comes up is like avoidance well I don't look at my bank account
9:56
or well to your point of women to ask enough for salary negotiations what would I go to my
10:03
boss so that they can reject me or you know we have this thing as an entrepreneur is that women
10:09
tend to go after the next certification so that they can justify that they want to increase their
10:14
prices right what do you think are three things that for the next decade women should be paying
10:21
attention more instead of leaning into the reasons why not to do it so that we can kind of like
10:28
flip that script and even though that we are experiencing financial trauma and even though that we
10:34
know we are against a system the would take time to change we still can reclaim that agency with
10:41
money so I'll just say disclaimer I'm not a therapist yes what I will say from you that
10:48
it will but but the conclusions that I really came to in this book in terms of like what we're
10:54
getting wrong about what empowerment looks like is again coming back to this idea of this idea
11:01
that it's an internal and individual process as opposed to what I think it requires which is for
11:08
women to actually flip the script and instead of thinking about like everything that they're experiencing
11:16
as the outcome of something that's happening from within them to flip the script and say okay what is
11:22
how is this outcome being reproduced because of the environment around me and instead of just
11:28
looking inwards what do I need to change in the environments around me or what can I change in
11:35
the environments around me so that I'm not continuing to experience this same reinforcement
11:42
of my financial trauma or these or that I'm not exposed to people who are going to reinforce
11:48
these nis or who are going to act on them so I break this down in the book again by if you are
11:54
enjoying this podcast go ahead and subscribe and share only you can help us grow so I break this
12:01
down in the book again by the interpersonal environment friends family partners the institutional
12:08
environment workplaces communities education systems and then the broader political and cultural
12:14
environment and thinking about operating at all of those different levels so that again even if
12:21
you're not rewriting the laws of the place you live you're still feeling a sense of agency and
12:27
purpose in curating those environments around you even if it's happening just at the interpersonal
12:33
level and I think that's a really powerful way we can reframe what empowerment means is like it's
12:39
not something that's only going to come in relationship to myself power is by definition in
12:45
relationship to the world around you and your biggest impediments to it particularly for those who
12:50
have been marginalized is typically not something that they are personally doing it is that they are
12:56
doing the same things as their more privileged peers only to get a different response and so that's
13:01
not a problem of inputs that's a problem of a system creating different outputs so how do we change
13:06
that environment the second thing is again you can't do this alone not just from a perspective of
13:13
the actual actions you take but the support system that you need in order to be able to take what
13:18
individual action you are taking right and so one of the things I talk about is that we've kind
13:24
of been giving we've kind of been like sold this idea that there's there's two models of womanhood
13:29
in modern day there's this idea of like hyper independence where I have to do absolutely everything
13:34
myself and I can't rely on anybody or hyper dependence and I think we see this example in really
13:40
exemplified on social media today with the trends like the tradwife where it's like I don't want to
13:45
everything myself so I'm going to give over all of my agency and just let someone else take
13:50
care of me and both of those models I would actually argue are incredibly risky because there is no
13:55
diversification whatsoever if you are entirely reliant on yourself that is too much to bear and if
14:01
you are entirely reliant on someone else that's too much risk to take and so what I want us to
14:06
think about is how do we create more interdependence how do we diversify our sources of not just income
14:14
but of meaning of support of relationships friendships community thinking beyond just a
14:21
relationship to a job or a relationship to a spouse and thinking about all of the value and
14:27
meaning and support we get in the world that extends beyond any single resource like a paycheck
14:33
but expands beyond like who can I call on if I lose my job tomorrow and I don't have income and
14:38
I can't award anything do I have a network that I that I have built and fostered that I could
14:43
go stay with them or do I have someone to call to watch my children if I'm in a pinch you know if
14:49
you have not done that work you will not be able to sustain a well-building journey in this
14:54
environment because it is we do not have enough of a meaningful economics and social safety net
14:59
at least in the United States to be without having community resources and support as well so I
15:05
think everyone should really focus a lot more on interdependence and not trying to be either
15:10
hyper independent or hyper dependent so that's a second thing my third thing in terms of like
15:17
and like dealing with this trauma and and how we move forward I think it's it's to build a vision
15:26
of what we think wealth and I guess our own personal ambition is beyond the confines of the way
15:34
it's been sold to us or told to us or been been positioned as how it should be particularly
15:41
for women I think the conversation around ambition is so often framed as a tradeoff between
15:48
your public life and your private life between your personal and your professional and I even see
15:54
even in like very progressive circles this implicit assumption that to succeed in one domain
16:02
is to give up another but that's only position that way for women this is not position this way for
16:08
men no family life and professional life those two things go hand in hand for men and this is
16:13
really interesting because it happens across income levels it happens across all forms of identity
16:18
but it's really the gender and line where these things are positioned as a tradeoff and mutually
16:23
exclusive for women while they're mutually reinforcing for men and so I really think moving toward
16:30
the next step is about rejecting the binary framework of trade-offs for those who identify as
16:36
women and really thinking more expansively understanding that ambition is not something that has
16:43
to be categorized into private versus public and that it can and should be something that is
16:50
mutually reinforcing and the reason that it's not isn't typically because of something we're
16:56
doing wrong but because we're not given the same supports as our male peers and instead of like
17:02
worrying with one another over which version of these trade-offs are the right ones to make I want
17:06
us to say why are we being asked to make these trade-offs that our peers are not asked to
17:12
and to demand more to demand a more expansive vision of what our ambitions are allowed to be
17:18
I think to that point and it's one of the things that I touch the most is ambition being
17:24
this bad thing to have especially as Latinos and as a black woman if you are ambitious that is
17:31
something wrong with you but it is is this weird concept because you should be or that's the way
17:38
that we grew up you should be ambitious enough to get ahead of maybe your family or your circle
17:44
but don't be too ambitious because that is brings bad things to you so I love that that's the last
17:52
point because it connects perfectly to the way that I see financial independence you cannot have
18:00
financial independence if you continue depending on the minions and kind of like words that others
18:07
have pointing to your definition of success and independence and ambition as well with that point
18:14
how do you envision women building wealth in 10 years from now when I think about the future that
18:21
that I hope for for my daughter for all our daughters for all our everyone honestly across gender
18:27
identity it's one that's really expansive it's one where we're not operating from a chronic
18:34
framework of what do I have to give up to gain some level of stability or rest or fulfillment it's
18:43
one in which our basic humanity is always guaranteed and the support system needed for that is
18:51
always in place and that is not something that we have to struggle for and that requires wealth
18:56
building tactics that are not just grounded in what we personally save it's in what we advocate for
19:03
in our communities and what we demand from our politicians certainly from our peers and the kinds
19:10
of resources that that they offer us and we offer them and how we show up for one another to ensure
19:16
that every single person has a basic standard of care and life that they are entitled to because
19:22
they are a human being and that standard doesn't change across identity that standard is guaranteed
19:28
no matter who you are and then from there man can you go after your ambitions in a real meaningful
19:35
way if you are not chronically operating from a place of fearing the loss of everything because
19:41
we are imaginations and our abilities to realize things are so limited by that all of us and I think
19:48
that's really a very very sad thing so what I want to see is a future where we are not constrained
19:56
individually or collectively by that reality okay did you hear something that you liked in today's
20:02
episode if so don't keep it to yourself go ahead right now yes right now before this episode end
20:10
and send this episode to those three friends three girlfriends that you know you can go to talk
20:19
about finance independence money business growth and entrepreneur life and all of these juicy
20:25
topics share this episode with them because that is the only way we can go together
20:30
Alejandra Rojas your host and I will see you next week