Tuesday, March 24, 2026

It's Tuesday, March 24th, 2026.

I'm Albert Moeller, and this is The Briefing, a daily analysis of news and events from

a Christian worldview.

There's so many big news stories around us, so many happenings in the culture, so many

issues thrown at us that Christians need to think through and need to understand in terms

of a Christian worldview.

Some of them are easier to talk about than others.

And in its own category came the news yesterday that Leo Radvinsky, the owner of the vast

website known as OnlyFans, had died at age 43 of cancer.

Now the death of Leo Radvinsky is a story into itself.

The emergence of OnlyFans as one of the most significant purveyors of pornography in

all of human history.

That's very much due to Leo Radvinsky's plan.

Radvinsky himself was born in what is now the former Soviet Union, in what is now present

day Ukraine.

His family came to the United States, lived in Chicago, he graduated from Northwestern

University.

He obviously was way ahead of his time in terms of digital technology and interest about

how to commercialize the web and how to commercialize web traffic.

He went into several different ventures before eventually centering in on OnlyFans, which

he purchased and basically ran and through his leadership and during his leadership, that

particular pornography site exploded to 377 million users bringing in more than $7.2

billion in revenue in a single year.

So again, the numbers, 377 million users.

That's larger than the population of the United States of America, $7.2 billion.

We're talking about a massive amount of money.

Now on the one hand, what this just underlines is the power of a distorted morality, a distortion

of human sexuality, a distortion of creation, order that is represented by the entire world

of pornography.

But we're also looking at the fact that this is a story that could only happen at this

point in human history.

So let's just review a certain, say, historical survey of this issue.

Pregnography has been a problem ever since there were drawings made on caves.

In other words, it's just so much a part of the following human imagination that such

things can be drawn and people can see them thousands of years later and go, okay, I know

what that is.

All right, it is a distortion and a manipulation of God's good gift of making us male and

female in establishing marriage and the sexual union and the command be fruitful and multiply

and fill the earth, which was given to the first couple to Adam and Eve and what is intended

to be a unitive gift to a man and a woman within the covenant of marriage for multiple

goods, including the gift of children.

The distortion of a sinful world leads to the fact that 3.77 million users are officially

registered and that means at least some kind of formal registry, often involving financial

information with this one platform, a platform that has done at least $7.2 billion a year.

Leo Redvinsky saw the opportunity to commercialize pornography in such a way that I have to

say a provider of pornography and in most cases, this means one way or another, a sex worker

is actually able to use the platform to sell pornographic materials and to sell it in

such a way that persons can go on and, well, you can do the math, they can find what they're

looking for, they can pay for it.

It doesn't surprise us, I think, that the distortion of human sexuality in the fall and

the fact that even as Romans 1 tells us that people, sinners can give themselves over

to sin.

When you talk about this kind of industry, of this kind of scale, you're talking about

the mass industrial production of pornography and we're also talking about it being consumer-driven

to such an extent that 377 million people are involved in this as registered users and

of course there are thousands upon thousands of those who are also providing.

Now there's so many dimensions to this and maybe we just need to go over for a moment

the fact that in every situation, pornography is wrong because pornography is based upon

the Greek word, poorneia, which is wrongful desire.

Okay, so that really in terms of scriptural truth just cuts through to the heart of the

matter.

Poorneia is a corruption of and a distortion of something good.

It is wrongful sexual desire.

That means that there can be rightful sexual desire within the context of marriage.

That makes it holy.

But when you talk about what this particular platform was commercializing, the only

fans platform, it was not a celebration of creation order, biblical sexuality.

It was the commercialization and mass production of its corruption and distortion.

Well, all right.

Let's talk about another Christian aspect of this, Christian biblical worldview aspect

of this.

What does it tell us that this is actually a mass industry?

It tells us this is a massive problem.

It tells us that what Paul describes in Romans chapter 1 is actually endemic in our

society.

As a society increasingly, we're just given over to this kind of corruption and this

kind of pornography.

An evidence of that comes in the fact that only fans is of interest to some people, not

because of pornography at all, but because of its financial success.

There are people who look at it and say, look, this is an interesting financial model.

There were capital investment companies looking at purchasing only fans, simply because it

is such a viable commercial product.

If there are $7.2 billion on the table this year, well, there are venture capitalists and

investors who could say it could be eventually $40 billion, so the sky is the limit.

The other issue for Christians is just to remind ourselves of what is essentially wrong

with this.

What is the evil at the heart of this?

That's where we come to understand that what the secular world wants to say about Christians

is often that we're just antibody and anti-sex.

That's just profoundly not true.

Being just profoundly antibody and anti-sex would be anti-biblical, anti-creation order.

You can't possibly buy into that kind of denial and then at the same time celebrate God's

holy institution of marriage.

You can't celebrate a young man and a young woman entering into the holy covenant of marriage.

You can't celebrate nor fulfill that divine mandate to be fruitful and multiply and fill

the earth.

No, we have to see here that there's big money, big, big money, and the corruption of

something good.

That's just a basic Christian worldview issue.

This is helpful.

If we can just see it, most of the horrible things in the world are intentional subversions

and corruptions of something that is good.

That is something good turned into something evil by the fact that it's wrenched out of

its biblical context.

It is corrupted from its creation order context and it's made to be something else.

Here's another big lesson, something else sells.

The Christian worldview has to explain why this kind of material is so very popular.

How is it that human beings have found their way on a cave wall or on a massive digital

platform to find or to sell or to consume this kind of material?

Well it is because we just see here the power of sin and the power of human depravity matched

with human ingenuity.

That just leads to an ever-expanding problem.

When we talk about an ever-expanding problem, let's just state the obvious, you had to

look at a cave wall to see it.

You had to be there to see it.

When you're talking about even, and many of us who are alive now, going back to the

time when I was a teenager, a young man, you really didn't have to worry about this issue

in the same way.

There was no internet.

There was no widespread access even to this material.

Thanks be to God for most people in my generation.

It wasn't much of a problem, particularly for Christian young men because frankly, it

was not something which there was a great deal of access.

How the world has changed, where you can have a teenager, a college student, you have

a young man who can have access to virtually anything, and I started as imaginable, but

I think that's a false limit.

I think it's virtually anything imaginable by anyone anywhere.

So let's just be really, really clear.

The biblical worldview says, no.

The Bible says no to Pornaya, says no to wrongful sexual expression, wrongful sexual

interest.

There are those in the secular world who would say, look, that's just some form of denialism

and people who hate the idea of sex and hate the idea of all the rest and the fact is,

we don't hate anything that God has given us as a good, but we also can't hate all the

rest, which means the entire context and even the explicit commands that go with it.

But we do understand, however, that if there is a human drive that is susceptible to this

kind of subversion and corruption, sex would be it.

And in particular, it's not equilateral, that is to say, that in patterns of sin, this

is far more a male pattern than a female pattern of sin.

Now, I'm not saying exclusively because that's not so.

In the digital age, the virus is spreading, but I will simply say that in the main, it

is a male-centered problem, but that also leads to other considerations.

And so, there are those who are women on these platforms, and I'm just going to speak

explicitly to that, and they are basically selling themselves.

And this is a commercial platform that says, you do it, we'll allow someone to pay you

to do it, we'll create the platform for it.

When you think about a diabolical plan, I mean, this is just a deeply diabolical plan

and strategy.

And obviously, it works.

And at the time that Leo Revinsky died, the report came just yesterday, there were firms

trying to buy only fans, and they're not buying it because they want to shut it down.

They're buying it because if anything, they want to expand it, to make it produce even

more revenue, to attract even more users.

And of course, that also means to widen all the expressions of depravity.

I'm going to end it with that today, and I think this is just an incredible wake-up call

for all of us.

We know that sins big business.

And we know that some of the most explicitly sinful sins revealed as such in Scripture

are those that are the most tenacious, and obviously, they're tenacious even in showing

up as a consumer product.

But as Christians, we have to understand that not only is this a direct rejection of creation

order, a direct rejection of God's plan, a direct disobedience to God's word, it is

a sin which is graphic in both what it represents by action and also by inaction.

It is a sin both of omission and a sin of commission, and it also is a dehumanizing

of human beings.

And it is the exploitation of human beings.

I guarantee you, behind all of this is not only sin and depravity and lust.

There is also manipulation and oppression, and basically a form of at least financial

enslavement when it comes to these patterns.

So, so, sad day, Leo Renewski died.

He died of cancer.

We are told at age 43, a very young death, and this is catapult to the story into the headlines.

And at least we as Christians need to understand there's a lot more to this headline than the

secular media would ever understand.

The next speaking about the impact and the legacy of sin, we have to look at how sins rewrite

stories.

And so in particular, I want to point to say is our shovas.

And of course, so many headlines, sister, recent days, pioneering reporting work done

by the New York Times, analysis by the Los Angeles Times, the Wall Street Journal, and just

pretty much all across the media landscape.

A lot of attention to say our shovas, particularly from his co-worker Dolores Huerta, accusing

say our shovas who died in 1993 of rampant sexual manipulation and even sexual assault.

And sexual assault not only against Dolores Huerta, who has come forward with this story.

And by the way, there's a lot of corroborating evidence.

So there's a lot of evidence that what she's saying is true.

And also that says our shovas, who with Huerta had founded the United Farmworkers back in

the period of the 1960s and the 70s, we are talking about a rewriting of history now,

a necessary rewriting of history.

And says our shovas has been a hero to so many people, especially on the political left

and in particular, the Democratic Party has held up, says our shovas.

And let me state that as a Christian, there is no doubt that he was responding to a legitimate

claim of oppression in many cases.

So again, the Bible is very clear against oppressing people.

At the same time, it was also clear that there was a leftist impulse behind this that also

became a part of the movement as well.

And so as Christians, we can understand that there are mixed motivations in any number

of situations.

These are shovas was so celebrated that his name was put on many schools, including

public schools.

And by some estimates, you're talking about several hundred identifiable public buildings

throughout the, especially the west and the southwest of the United States that have

been named for Cesar Chavez, a cultural hero.

The Democratic Party has been closely identified with support for the movement of Cesar Chavez

and support from the United Farmworkers.

Drado El Codava, writing at the Atlantic, an article entitled The Dethroning of Cesar

Chavez, he says this, one of the most revered figures of not only Latino history, but

of all of 20th century United States history can no longer be thought of as heroic, but

the movement he led still can be end quote.

Okay, let me just mention that as Christians, we need to understand how some of these stories

work.

And this is predictable, and this isn't even a complaint.

This is just a fact of how news gets out and how people deal with it.

You have an initial report.

And the first question, when there's a story of this kind of moral importance, the first

question that comes on the part of many is, is it true?

And then there's a second wave of documentation that comes and the public has to make a decision.

And by the way, in this case, the evidence is evidently so overwhelming.

No one seems to be arguing at all that this didn't happen.

Then there is yet another wave.

And in this, you have the article that I decided from the Atlantic, the dethroning of Cesar

Chavez.

This man's coming back to say, you know, we really do need to understand that Cesar Chavez

was an evil man, and we need to take whatever actions are morally necessary to remove his

name, to create distance, to revise history, et cetera.

But he goes on to say, and that's the reason I read that sentence, that quote, one of

those revered figures, not only of Latino history, but also 20th century, United States

history can no longer be thought of as heroic.

But the next words are important, but the movement he led still can be.

So now you have another wave of response to something like this saying, okay, but let's

be careful to say that this is the argument that's being made is that Cesar Chavez may

no longer be celebrated, but the movement he started can be.

That's the argument that this article represents.

I just want to remind us as Christians that this is the kind of thing that can still

shock us, but it can't fundamentally surprise us.

And any reader of scripture has read enough to know of human sinfulness in such a way

that we're just not shocked in this kind of context to find out that sexual manipulation,

sexual oppression, sexual violence, sexual opportunism took place.

And of course, all of this is just a complex of sexual sin.

And I'll just point out that the secular society has a hard time knowing how to unpack all

of this.

When in our secular society, the only moral principle many people hold to is consent.

Then the only way that someone like this can be seen as guilty of sexual misbehavior

is if there was no consent.

And actually that's what Dolores who are just claiming she's claiming that this was

assault against her will, against her consent.

So even the secular world can say, well, that's wrong.

The secular world wants to say that there are no fundamental rules when it comes to sexuality

so long as they're consenting adults, but in an article like this does imply there's

more to it.

The moral verdict behind this does imply that there's more to it.

By the way, there's another aspect of this.

And that is that even on the left, there is the belief that children can't give consent

in this situation.

So sexual activity against children, well, that turns out to be a sex crime and that's

involved in this story too.

I just want to remind Christians that we actually do share the moral outrage you see in these

articles.

We should, we should absolutely be in agreement that says our shoves if he did these things

should not be celebrated by anyone and has described it to himself and his movement

to use good on the list.

I can tell you they're going to be an awful lot of rename schools in coming days or

more months.

However long it takes, this is just the way it works.

It also tells the human beings to have a very strong moral impulse.

So let's just not even think of left, right?

Let's just think of moral impulse here.

It's a very strong moral impulse.

And so it is interesting.

A lot of the people who would have demanded that sees our shoves, you know, is there

be a national holiday in his honor, they're now wanting to take his name off of schools

and all the rest.

And it's for moral wrongdoing.

So even in a society that wants to reduce the ground in which there's recognized moral

wrongdoing, you know, at least on this, that there is the agreement.

Yep, this was profoundly evil.

All right.

One final thought on this, we as Christians understand that human beings are all sinners

and Christians of those who are sinners saved by grace.

And you know, the New Testament does include heroes of the faith.

Just think of of what you find in the book of Hebrews, men and women who courageously

have faithfully served the cause of Christ.

And even before Christ and the Old Testament, you had Old Testament figures, you know, Abraham

most extensively treated there in Hebrews as an exemplar.

This doesn't mean they were without sin.

But it does mean that the final verdict on their lives was, was one of faithfulness by

God's grace and two God's glory.

And it was by God's work.

But we look at this and we recognize, you know, history does have a way of unfolding things.

It has a way of unfolding things that leads to historical judgment.

And just a matter of say a year ago, there would be people who would be wanting to put,

say, Zarshava's his name on institutions.

Now they want to take them off.

And you know, as Christians, we need to be the people who say, you know, there's really

something to this.

However, we also need to tell you, there is a lot more to this than you think.

All right.

Finally, I want to look at a controversy there in the United Kingdom is coming to us

from Britain.

The telegraph reports, quote, girl guides at war over Transban.

Okay.

The girl guides are the equivalent to the girl scouts here.

And they come out of a common movement.

And of course, they began both in Britain and in the United States with those identified

as boy scouts back in that golden era when everyone knew what a boy was or who a boy was.

And now we're talking about a very different thing.

You had girls organizations that were also formed, the girl guides, at least roughly analogous

to the girl scouts in the United States.

Now let's just remind ourselves that girl scouts have been confused for a long time.

The girl scouts have been largely serving a very liberal revisionist morality to the left

to the boy scouts.

But then again, the boy scouts more or less just joined them and in fact, now it's just

scouting USA.

In other words, boy and girl just removed, at least from the boy scouts side of the equation.

And that's a very sad thing because I think these organizations had done a great deal

of good.

But it is telling that now you have in the telegraph a headline that the girl guides

are at war over Transban.

Okay.

So here's the deal.

The girl guides, again, just thinking of them as the girl scouts in the United Kingdom.

They had decided years ago to have basically a pro-trans policy.

And so that meant that within the girl guides, there would be those who were, let's just

state the obvious, physiologically, boys.

And it just turns out that didn't work so well.

Who would have thought it?

That just didn't work so well.

And so now they're adopting a new policy and this is the trans ban in the headline.

We are told that there's now an organization called Guiders Against Trans Exclusion.

That's G-A-T-E, you know, how clever.

We're told, quote, the group encourages guide leaders to oppose the policy through activism,

including writing to politicians and attending protests.

Okay.

I just want to say to Christian parents, there is one, absolutely, I just think, important

paragraph in this article coming to the telegraph in London, I'm just going to read

it to you, quote, one brownie leader, so you hear brownie again, you recognize that same

verbage in the United States.

One brownie leader who asked to remain anonymous said, quote, it's an increasingly hostile

environment.

Communications from girl guiding headquarters seem to assume everyone is devastated by

the rule change.

I haven't had a single parent ask me about it, unquote, okay, you know, sometimes civilization

just comes into focus in an unexpected way through just a sentence like that.

And so we're told that the headquarters at this organization, they assume that parents

and scouts are going to hear this and see it as bad news, but the article just goes on

to say, quite honestly, quote, I haven't had a single parent ask me about it, unquote.

So let's just state the obvious, the vast, and I mean, the vast majority of parents would

expect that this so-called new policy should and should always have been the policy.

It tells you something about the distance between the group and elites in power.

So it turns out that the elites in power who are lamenting that they had to make this

decision, they're in a very different moral position than, say, local scouting units,

including the parents and the girls.

They seem to understand this clearly and see it clearly and believe that it is clearly

the right thing.

By the way, one of the big issues behind this was a judgment by the Supreme Court there

in the United Kingdom in Britain last April that made very clear that there really are

two sexes, male and female and sort of like what you have in the Trump administration's

very helpful clarification of the fact there are two sexes, two genders, male and female,

the female with the large reproductive cell and the male with the small reproductive

cell, just in case someone out there is unable to connect the dots.

It does tell you that these kinds of decisions, these kinds of rulings come with consequences.

So the organization, once again, the girl guides there, they've really had to come into compliance

with this ruling, I'll just point out that as Christians look at it, it's also

compliance with God's law, yes, yes, it's also compliance with, oh, I don't know, biology.

Let me also point out that this decision by the girl guides was not generated from within

the organization, basically forced on them by this judicial decision and as in the United

States, we have organizations, schools and others who are having to comply with the executive

orders coming from the Trump administration.

It's a reminder to Americans that all of this correction, all of this clarification, all

of this sanity will only last so long as those policies last.

Thanks for listening to the briefing.

For more information, go to my website at AlbertMohler.com.

You can follow me on extra Twitter by going to x.com forward slash AlbertMohler for information

on the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, go to spts.edu.

For information on voice college, just go to voicecollege.com.

I'll meet you again tomorrow for the briefing.