
Victor Davis Hanson: Is Marco Rubio the GOP’s Best Bet for 2028?
About this episode
Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words is made possible by:
Get every episode summarized
Each time Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
738 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words — Victor Davis Hanson: Is Marco Rubio the GOP’s Best Bet for 2028?. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Music Hello and welcome to Victor Davis Hanson in his own words. This is our Friday edition. We're doing it a little bit early and Victor is on vacation this week. So we're going to answer questions that our viewers and listeners have sent in. So I've got lots of questions. I'm trying to get as many in as I can. Everybody out there. But you know, it's I can't promise everybody. But and you're not putting in the questions that start with the F word the S word. No, we don't have anybody who's really angry here. I think most of us are not just you know, but they're not included. They're not included. Especially the Israeli article I wrote. J. Did you get a lot of? Yeah, it's a lot of people. Got angry that I said that it's getting more and to just blame Israel for all
the ills of the world. Without self-respect and I'm looking at other countries and other perpetrators of much worse sense. All right, but no, we have whether the DSA agenda as it's proposed is looks more or less like the first government of the United States under the Articles of Confederation. And then Rubio versus JD Vance for 2028. So stay with us for those questions and we'll be right back. Female athletes are being forced to compete against biological males sometimes without their consent or even their knowledge. In Washington high school software, Kelly Keeler was sexually assaulted on the wrestling mat during a tournament. Only afterward did she learn her opponent was a boy who identifies as a girl. With the help of Alliance Defending Freedom Kelly is bravely suing the state over a policy that not only allows males to compete in girls high school sports but doesn't require schools to disclose
that information to female athletes or their parents. Don't let schools put gender ideology over the safety of girls in sports. Your support today can help fight for Kelly and other athletes like her. And for a limited time, your first gift to ADF will be doubled by a special matching grant. Well funds last. Text Hanson to 83848 or go to join ADF.com slash Hanson to have your gift doubled. Welcome back. Dr. Davis Hanson in his own words and for you who are new and to remind other people, Victor is the Martin Nileanish and senior fellow in military history and classics at the Hoover institution and the Wayne and Marsha Busky Distinguished Fellow in History at Hillsdale College. You can find him at his website. The blade of Perseus, please come join us here. The URL is victorhanson.com. If you would like the exclusive ultra material, it is 650 a month
to give it a try or $65 a year. I have a comment. I had a letter from someone on an email. Said, why is you why are you using this term blade of Perseus? What is it? Is it just and I said in Greek mythology, the Gorgon Madusa who turned people to stone if they saw her snaky hair was killed by the hero Perseus who used a shield to see the reflection and then guide him by beheading her and she represented the forces of darkness. So it is an arrogant assumption that we hear in our audience or the blade that's going to cut that Gorgon's head off, that the Gorgon represents all of the dangerous ideas in the West today, particularly in America. It's our duty to decapitate those ideas, not a person. I must say,
I'm going to be careful. Some of the people that I've seen on the anti-ice protests, they look like Madusa. They have the hair that's really strange looking and they squeep, they have that makeup and they scream in yell. I wouldn't want to decapitate them though. No, of course not. All right, so we do have some questions in these next two days on civilization and the prognosis for the future or how to face the things that are happening in Western civilization, but that's not our first question. So let me get to the first question, Dr. Davis Hanson. This is from Jack Moses and he wrote a longer letter but I'm going to read the part that is the question concerning the ideas of abolishing the Senate and presidency, making the federal government a unicameral system as the democratic socialists of America are proposing. How close is this to the first United States federal government, the Continental Congress,
a system that was deemed to be inefficient and ineffective as a form of government already? That's a very good question. I think what he's saying is from 1776 to the ratification of the Constitution in 1817, 1887-88. We had the Articles of Confederation, Continental Congress, and then the Articles of Confederation. And each state of the newly formed union had one vote. So they had the 13 delegates and they discussed matters of revenue, taxation, but they couldn't do anything because there was no judicial branch and there was no executive branch and it was a unicameral legislature. The funny thing about it was there was no precedent of that system in the long history of constitutional government that began in Greece.
If you look at the Spartan Constitution, if you look at the Roman Constitution, you look at the Creighton Constitution, you look at the Florentine, there had always been a upper house. That's where we get the word Senator from Sinek's. We get Senail from older people, over 30, the Roman Senate. And then there were the tribal councils are in Sparta. You had the Gerusia, that's a Greek translation of Sinek's older people, the old people, and then you had the assembly of all free males. In Athens you had the Ecclesia, all males, and then you had the Boulet, the upper house. And the principle was that you had people who didn't have to run for election periodically in the arcades every two years, but every six. You can be 25 and be a representative, you got to be 30 to be a senator.
And you don't represent the people. You represent the people as represented by the state. So the census determines how 435 people in the house will, how many people that represent. I think it now it's about 750,000. So the democratic socialist or mad because they say, well, a senator in California represents 20 million people and the other one represents 20 million people. And Wyoming up 425, 50,000, they only represent 250,000. So they have more cloud, but they're not representing individual people. They're representing the state as an entire entity. And because they're older and they're not directly up for re-election every two years,
they're supposed to be more sober and judicious. In other words, the fiery house represents grassroots populism. Then the Senate, and I don't know if I'm going to sign that bill because I have to take into consideration the whole state and the union. And that's the principle. So when they had a unicameral just to everybody voting, one vote, continental congress dash articles of Confederation without a Supreme Court to rule whether that was permissible. When they, you know, everybody in the continental congress said, how many people want to crown Washington as a king? If he had probably said, he would have said no, but that might have passed. But a Supreme Court person could said, that's contrary to the law. So they want to abolish the presidency and they want to abolish the Senate, the bicameral Western tradition of legislative government. So the questioner has a really good point. What he's saying is they want to take us back to the articles
of Confederation. But why would they do so when it failed? There was no power. There was no executive. They were just squabbling. It was just a mob. The answer to that is they don't care. They want a mob. They want everybody just going in there and screaming and yelling and there's no sober, judicious people trying to say, wait a minute. Wyoming has some interest here. Montana is an entity. Utah has rights. No, no. We're just all going to be whatever 51% anywhere in the country. We'll dictate. We don't want a president to veto what we do. So if we want a 20% tax on the wealthy, and we pass out, we don't want the president saying, no, no, no, you've got to get now two-thirds of the override in the Senate. Didn't we see the upshot? Maybe everybody didn't see these pictures of that Angie Nixon who was a representative in her own assembly and they were doing something she didn't like. So she got a bullhorn out and started walking around the room yelling at things.
Yeah, she's a bit of a mob. She's what we call in classical Greek, a demagoguist, a fiery leader of the people. Supposedly, I think she's originally her family with some Haiti. She's kind of like the new jasmine crocket. In this sense, she cannot finish a sentence without blaming white people. White people did this, this, this, this, this. Even Roe Conneyev, you notice how he's changed lately? He was on Fox as the sober and judicious Democrat for a while. And then when he saw that was no longer working, now he's a socialist radical. And he said one of the most reprehensible things he did, there has been a woman who hung herself an African-American and was ruled a suicide. And then there was a missing person that showed up with a with a rope around her neck. I think there's been three. So he gets on there and says there's an epidemic of black people being hung. This is reminiscent of lynching and we need to have a national role with all due respect.
About 85% of all black males that are killed or killed by other black males in rare interracial rare interracial murder. It's about six to eight times depending whether it's first degree, second degree, etc. More likely that black people kill white people than white people kill black people. If you're referring to hate crimes and you want to look at proportionality of the demographic, white people who represent 67 to 70% do not account for 70% of the perpetrators of hate crime. Black people who represent about 12% of the population represent about 25% of the perpetrators. So and Jews that represent about 2 to 3% now who identify as Jews, maybe four or five who are parents were Jewish. They represent in some states like New York 50% of the victims and they almost
have no evidence that their perpetrators of hate crime. So here's Rokana against all the statistics just clawing on to three isolated incidents that probably were suicide and he's suggesting that we're back in the clan period and he's doing this because he wants to run for president and he thinks he's going to get the DI socialist vote. And he thinks he's safe because the population is highly uneducated. And the district in California that elected him is a Bay Area affluent district and he's worth his and his father-in-law's worth a quarter of a million a billion dollars. And his children as I said earlier have golf courses and their trust funds and their names and his wife drives. I never understood a range rover. 190,000 is wife drives. Everybody I know who's had one has they're not mechanically reliable. And there was that one Chevy model or four that looks almost exactly copied it. You know what I mean? It looks exactly like it.
And every time I see one I think it's a range rover. I forgot that it's not a it has a a topical name for it. But why not just buy one of those it's reliable. Yeah exactly. All right, Victor this is a question I've been interested in. There were a lot of people wrote in and they basically were in support of Rubio for for 2028 presidential. And we're kind of on the right in the Republican Party in Aquandry because Rubio does look really good to a lot of people a lot of our audience. And JD Vance not as as appealing and the one writer that I'm quoting from cities inexperienced and inauthentic politico. So the you get a vibe from him or at least the audience is getting a vibe that he's less genuine than Rubio less experienced than Rubio less authentic. You know, I don't know if you've noticed that. But what are your thoughts on those two?
Well, I think they're talking about recent polls. I don't trust any of the polls because they're all slanted. I do not believe right now that Pete Buttigieg is pulling ahead of both Rubio and Vance. That's not possible. But the Emerson polls said that Rubio polls anywhere from three to five points higher than JD Vance does against Puditive 2028 Democratic Buttigieg, AOC, Newsom, etc. Okay. So there's a sense now that his name keeps coming up. And we have to ask two questions. Why? And what are his strengths and weaknesses vis-a-vis Vance? Why they come up are twofold? Vance has been in the news a lot for what he says. In other words, Israel can't kill itself out of Lebanon. Or he says
that we're looking for the moderates in Iran. And they haven't gone down well with people. Rubio is increasingly like because he doesn't give gratuitous statements about philosophy or ideology. Or he's not hawking a book right now. I'll give you an example. Kimberly Strassel, the Wall Street Journal opinion column. Who might like him, he's back. She wrote, kind of an anacious column saying, you know what? Trump's problem right now is the economy is pretty good. But he's not getting that message out on employment, inflation is slowing down. GDP is good, foreign investments, good record. These new technologies were pre-eminent. Why isn't JD Vance out there on the stump rather than hawking his book or going to Hungary to help Victor Orbana in losing cause? And then a whole
team of mega people attacked her. So then she replied. So he's out there saying things, but Rubio, I'm just ad liby now. Trump says, well, I wanted to get that Chinese Hutchinson related company out of the the Excess and Entry and all. And I'm going to sound off and play bad. We're going to get out of the Panama Canal and just take it. Marco go down there. And so Marco goes down there and says, you know what? Trump is mad. I don't know if I can handle him. But there's a way out for you guys. You don't want the Chinese. We don't want them. Let's just kick them out and get closer than ever because the whole tide of South America is going and Central America is going conservative to America. And you don't want to be in the last outpost. Maduro's gone. And that worked. And so the same thing about Iran, same thing about Israel, they call him in. And because he's got 15, 16 years in Congress as the Senator, 12 maybe. So that's why he is in the news for doing
things. JD's and the news for same things and his doing things have worked out and JD's saying things have been controversial. So then you look up, you put JD, who will be you in a side by side column. And this is in direct reference to what the questioner asks. JD has only been in politics two years. It was an amazing leap from being holding no prior office to becoming a US Senator, no city council, no state legislature, no congressperson. But his still his experience in politics is two years. Will be os is seven or eight times that six or seven times. Number two, JD did a wonderful job when in the vice presidential debate. And he was on leave. He appeared about 60, 70 times. He was there on media every day.
So the people who said, why is he on the 2024 ticket when you're going to win Ohio, his state anyway, be he's a white male like Trump and see he's probably to the right of Trump on MAGA issues. So you're not being inclusive. And he should prove them wrong because the Trump people said, yes, but he's a masterful debater. And he will slice up newscasters and Tim wall and all that prove true. So he helped win. Rubio had a debate and he didn't do too well in 2016, if you remember. And then when he replied once to the state of the union, I think it was Obama's, he had a drink water and he looked nervous. That was young will be so JD seems at one point compared to the earlier rubio, the better debater, the better ad hoc extemporary. Then you go to experience, Marco will be a
would have never said that Israel can't kill its way out of problems and Lebanon. He would have never trusted the Iranians. He wouldn't believe there's a moderate there. He's tough guy. And he's not so, I don't want to say naive. And then here's the other, we go to the next fourth criteria. JD is vice president. So the vice president usually inherits the ticket when the president's termed out. So it's very hard for someone who was not an elected official to run for president. So Rubio would run as a secretary of state, not an active senator. He would be the vice president. What's my feeling about where people stand right now given that all of the news about Rubio has been good and the media has turned on vans and we have one other taboo subject. And that is when
Rubio said a year ago that he would defer to vans and he had no political aspirations. And vans was first in line. We did not have the Thomas Massey, Marjorie Taylor, Green, Tucker Carlson, Megan Kelly, apostates. In other words, they were all, I'm not, I'm not being unfair. I don't mean that every single one of them. But collectively at various times, they were more logo. They were on Air Force one. They were on the campaign. They were hardcore mega supporters of Trump. Now they're hardcore opponents of them. And they fairly or not, Tucker's son worked for JD. JD is seen fairly or not as the right side of the mega base. More into tariffs, more into protecting the white working class, all of those issues.
And those are the issues that this group of people that I talked about were champion. So it presents a dilemma if he were to be the nominee in 2028. And given that all the people I just mentioned are very critical of Trump, would they come out for JD or would they hold him accountable for supporting Trump's war or whatever I don't know. But that group will not be as large as Rubio's group if Rubio can maintain the base. In other words, if Rubio were to say, they were lost anyway. You don't want Thomas Massies. He couldn't even get a nomination in Tennessee of his own party as an incumbent. You don't need Marjorie Taylor Green. She couldn't even run for re-election. She was out. You don't really need Tucker. He just barks at the moon now. He says all these crazy things. You don't need Nick Fuentes. You don't need Candace O'on.
Don't mean that JD wants them, but maybe they would favor him or Trump. So although Fuentes made front of JD's wife was horrible and said that she was Indian and all this. And so Rubio then would say those guys are 2% of the demographic of the Republican Party. Most people agree with Trump. I'll get all of those. I'm not going to be tagged with those type of supporters. Moreover, I will get a huge Hispanic vote. Trump got it 49, but I will hit the trail and I'll talk in Spanish and I'll give them a hard pro-capitalist, anti-communist riff and tell them all the stuff we did in Latin America, the flip government's pro-American and a close-the-border and help people get competitive wages. That kind of stuff. So it's going to be an inevitable. I think it's going to be a nasty fight.
I really do. Unless Rubio just says, you know, I think he's about 58. I don't know. I haven't checked or maybe it's a little younger. He can wait eight years. But the way we're going now, there's a lot of centrifugal forces ganging up against the mega movement. And you want to expand it. You don't want to double down, hang her down and get it smaller. Yeah, you don't want to collapse. Well, Victor, let's welcome back our sponsor. My Patriot supply. Food security should never depend on perfect weather, flawless supply chains or fully stocked grocery shelves. Extreme weather and drought can hit crops. Transportation and supply chains disruptions can slow deliveries. Livestock disease can put added pressure on the system. You can't control every threat, but you can control how much food your family has on hand. We've been working with my Patriot supply
for a long time in their on a mission to make sure every hard working American can rely on themselves when things go sideways. That's why they're doing something that they've never done before by offering their best selling for week. Emergencies, food supply by one get one 50% off. These kits deliver 2000 calories per day. And that is not starvation rations with long lasting shelf stable meals. They're easy to store and simple to prepare. But don't put this off. Strengthen your food supply security today at prepare with vdh.com. That's prepare with vdh.com. And again, prepare with vdh.com. And we'd like to thank my Patriot supply for continuing to sponsor the Victor Davis Hansen show. And I know in other ads I've read that they have huge five star reviews, like 10 million or something.
I don't know. That's probably too much, but but anyways, lots of five star reviews. Okay Victor, so let's turn to Trump's detractors. And I'm going to say they at the beginning here and he will define who they are in just one moment. So this is Alistair McLaughlin. And he says, why are they doing this? Surely they know what they are doing will destroy the USA Europe and thus the world. I refer to all those who oppose President Trump and his agenda from Thune to mandami Pelosi, Newsom, the Greens, net zero, the LGBTQ XYZ plus transgender maniacs, open borders and Islamic supporters at all. They must know that their agendas, if implemented, can only lead to the destruction of the world and the inevitable collapse into a dystopian hell. What are your thoughts on that?
They do it because they don't think they themselves are subject to the consequences of their own ideology. What do I mean? Nancy Pelosi has a Italian Palazzo in Napa and she has a big mansion in San Francisco. She does not believe that her open border illegal alien policies will do the following. She believes that she might have a gardener who's illegal, a cook, a house cleaner, that's fine. But she does not think that when she flies back and forth to Washington, the pilot is going to be an illegal alien. Like a lot of people worry they're going to be on the freeway and they're going to be hit by an illegal alien. She doesn't worry about that. If she does, she's going to be in a big range rover and number one and the same with alien Omar and the same thing with AOC. So they don't think that an illegal alien criminal is
going to attack them like they 500,000 of attacked other people. They have security at Washington and they're watched. They don't believe, I mean, think about it for a minute. All of the San Francisco popular leaders that were elected from the Democratic side gave us the homeless problem. They gave us the illegal alien problem. They gave us the high taxes and they gave us a flight to people out. But ask yourself, former Senator Barbara Boxer down in Rancho, Marage, you think that she worries about homeless people? Do you think she worries about high taxes when she's making all that? You think that the late Diane Feinstein with a lakefront mansion at Lake Tal and another mansion in San Francisco, do you really think that she worried about the price of gasoline? I don't. It was more cosmic about, oh, am I going to live to 90 in a green world?
Do you think that Gavin Newsom and his $9 million home? I don't think that he worries about his high tax policy. Does he think a forest fire is going to burn it down? I don't think so. Does he think somebody's going to break in and kill him? No. Does he think he's conboy is going to go down to 99 and a legal driver who can't speak English and a big semi is going to destroy it? No. So they create all of these scenarios. And the question that I think the person is asking is, do they do it to hurt everybody else? Chaotic. They just are. Do they really believe that they can pander to the lowest common denomination or appetites and get power? So if you tell enough people, you're always a victim, your lives are miserable. I'm here to help you, but the people who are doing this to you are not yourself and not this. It's them. These evil white heterosexual male Christian males. They're doing
it to you. And that's how they remain power. And they love power. They love telling people what to do. They love the money. They love the perks. They love everything about it. But they don't, they find ways that they don't have to suffer. So I can tell you, when I went to Stanford medical, I was on a long list waiting to get a pet scan. And because I was an employee at Stanford, I got expedited somewhat. I don't want to impune that I was given special preferences, but I watched people come in there from different countries. And when I go to other non-stanford affiliated healthcare, I see people very wealthy immigrants that come in with security sometimes. And they get great healthcare. So what I'm saying is Nancy Pelosi doesn't go into the Soma ER, and have to show an ID to a police person that's there to make sure there's not a gang role that erupts. She doesn't go and sit there where she's the only English speaker. So yeah,
she can talk all along about universal healthcare and Obamacare, but she's got concierge or special healthcare. And she knows that when she goes into UC Berkeley, USAF or somewhere, she's going to go right to all of these people are elites. I keep, I know people get angry, but I keep telling you that Rokana and Ilyan Omar and AOC and Shavall Yeh and Zoran Mondami and Hassan Piker and El Saeed is no accident. And what was the latest guy in the Co-Cheroman in Brooklyn with a million and a half dollar apartment as mommy and daddy bought a scare mo something. There's no one else. I'm sitting on the grass. His name's not notable. Yes. So the point is that's the pattern. Bernie Sanders is not poor. He's got three homes. He's a millionaire. And so I don't know what to tell you, but it's not coming from the people. As I'm speaking right now, a good friend of mine is an electrician and he's under the house.
I've been talking to him today. He didn't say, you know, Victor, I'm under your house. This is I'm in a victim. And I, he says, this was my day off and I want to get some extra income because I want to improve my house at home. It's, it's a weirdest thing in the world, but that's, that's the reductionist. They want power and they think that they're, they think their destructive policies will hurt people. They don't like and will not exempt them. So they have no illusion about a utopia that they talk about because they always talk about it. When they walk through L.A. Karen Bass, when she walks through L.A. and sees that, does she really believe she created utopia? They have medieval typhus now. No, they don't care. They, and their way of thinking, and who do those people hang around with? You know what I mean? The reason that we have a democratic socialist party is not because a bunch of people didn't go to college and they were poor or, we have a lot of affluent white and Asian young people in
urban areas that have college degrees with massive student loans. And they think in their glibness and their indoctrination from college where everything was free once you paid, oh, I'm going to go bowl. Oh, it's free. Oh, I'm going to go see the doctor. Oh, it's free. Oh, I'm going to go to the latte bar. Oh, it's free. Well, I'm going to go to the gym. Oh, it's free. Oh, I'm going to go everything is free. It's socialism. And I can't remember when I was 18 and I had to go into the bookstore and I wrote a check for a book, the books for the class. It was $15 and I wrote a $15 check and I said, oh my god, I only have $90. Why do I have to pay for my books? I they're free in high school. Everything else here is free. The food once you pay the minimum. It's all free. Or at least you can find some of it that way. Yeah. So that's what it's all about. It's about power and their exempt from the consequences of what they do that. We're lab rats. They're the guys on the white codes. That might also the fact that most of the DSA or a lot of
large portion of its population are young people. That might also be when he found out that there was a higher incident of miscarriages or young men were pretty much exempt from the ravages of COVID, but not exempt necessarily in some cases from cardiovascular autoimmune problems from the vaccine. You think if he had a grandson who was a young man or a granddaughter who was a woman who was pregnant, he didn't call him up and warn them. I do. If he did. All right. Speaking of Fauci, let's go to a question from Hong and Curtis. And they listen to your podcast. And here's their question. I had a thought. Do you think they meaning the Jim Jordan's commission or no, sorry, Rand Paul's committee? Do you think that they mishandled the release of Fauci's diary doing so before his Senate hearing? If they would have
held it until after he testified, could they possibly have asked the questions they did and then sought prosecution? I'm not sure. If you remember the Iran Contra testimonies, they had given immunity to all in North in the judicial to testify. So when the Congress came in and asked him all these things, he just played the... Sometimes he played the fifth and sometimes Brendan Sullivan as lawyer said, wait a minute, he has no... He's already been excused from criminal exposure on these topics. So there's always a conflict between the legal system and the congressional system because one or the other can offer pardons that the other one doesn't accept. And the rules of evidence are much different. But I think the questioner is saying, well, he said
this stuff in his diary and then the diary proves that he was either lying in the diary or he was lying to us. And don't you think that they should have gone after the stuff in the diary first before they exposed it and gave him a chance to plead the fifth? But the diary is not a legal document. He didn't sign an affidavit. So if a DA is looking at this and they're thinking, hmm, you said that one mass, two mass, three mass were important and they were all... And this was contrary to what you said in your diary or you said in your diary, Scott Atlas has a good idea about shutting down, keeping up the schools open, but I shut them down. So you were lying. You said, no, you don't understand what the diary is. It's not truthful. It's me venting what I do in my diary is I expose,
explore different ideas. I say, well, and Tony, I think he called himself Tony's book. Tony, what would you do this day? And maybe I did. What would happen if I was thinking, what would happen if I had fun to the lab? Then I would kind of make... You know, he would say that. It's not on... I do swear under God and solemnly tell the truth only through nothing but the truth. So I don't think it can be used in any venue to catch him in line except one. And that is the power didn't cover. So if Rand Paul said to him, you said that the virus came from... in your opinion from my bat or a penguin, but in your diary, it was clear that you thought they were, which is it? And are you lying then or now? We want you to say something. He wasn't going to say
something under oath. His idea was, well, I'm not going to... I'm going to take the fifth because this is not now covered. A new statement could be perjury. And so he was basically saying, I'm not going to answer it that. And he also has basically said everything in his diary was just idle speculation. Did he actually say that? I didn't know anything. That's what he could do. Yeah, exactly. This was a private document. Why does... Why... Anyway, everybody writes stuff in their diary. Yeah. That's what his legal team has basically said. All right. So let's then turn to the Abrams Accord. And Tracy Mitchum says, can you address in one of your podcasts, the Abram Accords? It's... I always say Abrams Accord, but it's the Abram Accords. Abram Accord. Yeah, Abram Accord, sorry. And Accord. It's history and how Trump giving Saudi Arabia a nuclear energy is affected by it. And you... would you also address how this decision can be
can affect the November elections? That's a long question. Well, so far we were told that the Gulf states were about ready to accept them when Trump went out of office in 2021 in January. And I think was it the Sudan or one of the... There's three or four countries. And then we were told Biden kind of out of spite, kind of ridiculed them. Remember that when Biden came in because of the Saudi government's involvement in executing a journalist, the Khashoggi murder, Trump... I mean, Biden said he wanted nothing to do with Saudi Arabia. I think he said it was a rebel. Renegate or a little legitimate government. And then during the 2022 midterms, he wanted to get the price of oil down. It got up to almost $5 a gallon. We had
9% inflation. And he went over to Saudi Arabia and said, my call for me, I'm actually not a call, but I didn't mean it. Can you just pump a bunch of oil and I'm going to drain the result and reserve and we'd get down. And they said, sorry. So that wasn't going to happen during Biden. He didn't want to give any credit to Trump. Trump comes in and he's thinking, well, Iran is the enemy of you guys. They were basically the Gulf states and the moderate errors were saying you got to take care of Iran and we'll join the accord. Well, then he didn't. I mean, he bombed successfully after 38 days. Everybody thought he would continue and go home. But he started talking, negotiating the and the Arab Gulf said, you can't talk to these people and we live right next to them. It's kind of like a neighbor. They're crazy and you call the police and the police go in and they arrest them and they perp walk them out to the grass and then they
have no cash bet bail. So then you say to the police, then the police come back the next day and say, would you lodge a calls again? Because these people are doing it again. You say, I'm not going to do that because I live right next to them and you come out and you don't put them in jail and I'm sitting next to them and they're going to start paying me back. So that's what they're telling us now. Either finish the job and neuter them or we're going to cut deals with them to stay alive. And that's kind of ruined the Abrams accord. And then there's also an alternate theory and I don't know how much credence we should put into it. But there are people riding the following. Even though Israel is going over to the UAE and other places and manning iron dome anti-missile and iron beam, iron beam, they are installing those units in the Gulf to protect them and they've done a wonderful job. And they've saved a lot of billions of dollars in infrastructure from
thousands of Iranian rockets. So de facto, we never thought we'd see that. But there are people who think the Gulf states and the moderate Arabs don't want the elimination of Iran. They want the diminution. So it doesn't threaten their existence but as a fellow Muslim country, crazy as it is, it is a bulwark against the West. What am I getting at? You removed the theocracy. You put the Pavlovi son in for a year. He has elections. They elect a pro-Western government that's secular. And all of a sudden, Iranian women are wearing shorts again. And people are protesting again and it's like a Western enclave. It's kind of like Israel. And the Arabs don't want that because it's infectious. So there's a group that feels that the Arabs want Iran
to be theocratic anti-Western but weak, but not eliminated and not secular because it's too close to them and that's too dangerous. It's like putting Las Vegas next to them. Okay, Victor. So let's go ahead and take a break and we'll come back and talk a little bit. We'll change completely. We're going to talk a little bit about Homer and Hezee. Stay with us and we'll be right back. Hello, this is Victor Davis Hansen for the Daily Signal. I have a new book out on September 8th of this year. I think you're going to enjoy it. It's called Counter Revolution. The fall and rise of Donald Trump and the Maga movement. It starts right after January 6th and it details the lack of popularity of Donald Trump, the invective that he endured, the five civil and criminal trials, the effort to get him off the ballot, the raid on Marlago, the two impeachments earlier, one in which he was tried as a private citizen and yet he came back. How did he come back? And why did he come back? I explain in the book how he defeated his primary opponents, how he was
outspent. He had a hostile media and he defeated the Democratic machine and Camila Harris. It starts on January 6th. It ends pretty much now in May of 2026. What's the title about? Donald Trump is not a revolutionary. He's not a revisionist. He's a counter-revolutionary. This time around, he is not addressing just the symptoms of the progressive project of the last 50 years. He's talking about the causes. Not just an open border, but how to stop illegal immigration entirely. Not just crime, but sending the National Garden to make sure cities are safe. Not just an Iranian nuclear threat, but ending that threat that seven other presidents had identified, but had did not act on. Not just addressing the transgender issue or the Green New Deal and all of those issues that are so dear to the Democratic Party, but ending them, defunding NPR and PBS.
So it is a counter-revolution to unwind and to roll back the entire progressive project of the last 50 years. I think you're going to like it. It's pretty interesting. It chronicles the greatest political comeback in our recent political history. Thank you very much. I'm Victor Davis Hansen for the Daily Signal. Welcome back. Victor Davis Hansen in his own words. You can find Victor on social media. His handle at X is at VD Hansen. And at Facebook, he has a Facebook page called Hansen's Morning Cup. So you can get the latest updates there with him. So Victor, I have a question for you. I had lots of questions about Homer and the Odyssey. So I'm going to try to collapse them all. I have a review coming out in the next issue of new criterion. 5,000 words on the movie. Yes. It's very critical, unfortunately. Yeah, imagine. So I'm going to collapse them all into Fred Lamasters. He's asked
several questions. Do you want me to put the questions all of them first or just go one by one fat rapid answer? Okay. So here are his questions. Was there an actual Homer? Number two, where did the written down version of that? Let me do it one by one. Yeah, that's the first Homer. Was there an actual Homer? Yeah. Yes. There were bards that are associated with people being blind because they couldn't function. So they had astute memories. And they developed the technique of oral poetry, memorization of folktales, which they could change through type scenes or repeated formula. Swift footed Odysseus Achilles, long suffering Odysseus. They would plug those. So they're trying to tell the long story, 12,000 lines. It takes a day and a half to recite the whole thing orally. But as they're thinking, do I put the psychops this time first or or I put clipso, then they can just rattle off 10 lines of filler. How to build a fire,
how to build a ship. It's going to be the same repeated. That full people before they knew it was composed orally because they said he repeats himself. He's not a very good poet. So there was a Homer and we know his name and not the other bards of the prior 500 years because he lived contemporaneously with the city-state ascendance and, more importantly, the development of writing using the Phoenician alphabet. There had been a script, linear B, but that was a different script for the Greek language. In other words, when he was singing and handing, he got the story from his older generation. And all the way back to about 12, 1150 with a collapse of the Mycenaean palaces. Then you had a dark age. And you know what happens in a dark age? People walk around and they have, you know, commerce collapses, the fertility rate collapses, agriculture collapses.
They're poor herders and shepherds. And somebody falls in and he's in a folos tomb. Who built this? He walks by Mycenaean. There's Cyclopean walls. The Cyclops built them. He sees scripts, linear B tablets, maybe in a grave. He digs up by accident. He's digging on his farm and he finds Mycenaean armor. Who were these people? Well, they were the gods. This was when the gods walked with man. So they elaborated these tales. And we know there was about 15 different tales. There was the sack of Troy. There was the nostroid. They returned of all the heroes and it didn't end well. It didn't end well. Agamemnon was killed. Ajax died of suicide, diameties, Achilles. They don't end well. And that shows you that as Mycenaean lords, they did not end well. But as the dark ages continued from 1110, 900, 800, they became
exaggerated the tales. And they put, we actually have names like Achilles on linear B tablets as Mycenaean lords. So those tales were exaggerated. And the last generation in that oral tradition, somebody wrote it down. So that was Homer. And he was probably the best of them. Because it's hard to write down on Papyrus. So they limited resources. And they said, let's write down the Ili in the Odyssey. But we had the whole epic tale, but we don't have, we know the epic tale of them later references. And it starts with a so-called rape of Helen. That means the capture of her by mentally, um, Papyrus. And then the flight, the first nine years of the war, then the wrath of Achilles, which is the Iliad. And then the Trojan horse into the walls and destruction of Troy. And then the return of Odysseus, the return of Agamemnon, the return, and then the tell them, to, to Lemekas stories. All right. So let's go to next question. I think
you might have answered part of it, but let's get it out there. Where did the written down versions of the Iliad and the Odyssey come from? Was Homer, was Homer the recorder or transcriber of these ancient poems? Did he write them down? That's a controversial question. When I was in graduate school, when you read Albert Lord or Millman Perry, it was considered purely oral poetry. And Millman Perry in the 1920s, a famous classicist, went over to Serbia, Dash, Croatia, and he saw oral boards barge up in the Balkans. And he said to them, can you give me some songs? And they recited, not in hexameter, but in a metrical pattern, with formula, with type scenes. And then he said, tell me a white poem about me. And it took him a little while. And they said, once upon a time, and came across Albert Lord, that many wisdomed, outward Lord, and they showed their repetition. So he wrote, he was a student
of Millman, Perry me. And Millman Perry, and he then said, so when I was a graduate student, 50 years ago, everybody thought they were purely oral. Since then, people said, if you go back and look at oral poetry, it's hard to get that level of detail by memory and by formulaic. So they might have had prompt cards, because it was the age of writing and Homer. Maybe he wrote a little thing down it, said cyclopsine, then colipso, flashback, etc. Because they're so intricate with flashbacks ahead and back in time. And so I think it's 90% oral poetry. He might have had, Homer might have been semi literate. But the generation contemporaneous with Homer are shortly after wrote that poem down, because it was so wonderful. And after about 750, 700, that text did not change much. So that's why we have his name and not his grandfathers are as
the earlier generation of Bards. Your next listener is asking for a translation of Hesiod, Roger Thompson. What's the preferred translation of Hesiod? I think he's referring to works and days. Yes. Hesiod was a contemporary of Homer. He wrote somewhere between 650, 700 AD. He was a Be Ocean, an inland poet. And he wrote a poem about a little village called Ascrow, up in the mountains near Mount Kathairan. I've been to Ascrow. And it's called the Erga Kai Himaera in Greek, the works and days. And it's about the length of one Homeric chapter, about 850 or so lines. And it's about two things, the days and the works. And it says,
this is how you make a wagon. This is what you should do. It's a didactic poem about when, if you're smart, per se as he's talking to his brother, then you'll get the weed in at this time. And this is how you store things. But it's also a moral, the other part of it. And it is, don't trust people in town. Don't trust quick at people on deals. But it also gives us a flavor of what contemporary Greece was like in the rural. So when I wrote the other Greeks of the story about the beginning of the city-states from an agrarian point of view, that was my Bible. I went through word by word. It is written in a Homeric Greek, ionic, dash, bowician dialect. Not that hard to read in Greek. And I grew up with Richmond, Latin more. Remember, he was the University of
Chicago professor and translator. And he translated the Iliad and the Odyssey. He translated, he said, it's a wonderful translation. He also wrote something called the Theogony, kind of a pedigree of the gods telling us who was married, whom, and who did this and that. But and then he had a colleague, David Green, GRE, N-E, kind of spelled, I think he was Scottish, immigrant, and he translated the, in addition to Latamore, he translated the works and days. And he was an active farmer and a Greek scholar. And I like that translation as well. So, Richmond, Latin more, or David Green, Richmond, Latin more was kind of the giant of translation. He kind of dominated the field for 30 years. He translated all of his team of whom my advisor, Michael Jameson, translated one of the tragedies of Euripides. But they kind of dominated the universe
Chicago, had all of the Iliad and the Odyssey and Hesiod and all the Greek tragedies in series. And they just sold like, that was what everybody bought the Latin more translation. And I don't think they've ever, I don't think translators have ever Robert Fitzgerald was more poetic. So, the problem with translations are, are you going to be literal and say exactly what Homer did? If you do that in English, it's going to be kind of clunky. Or can you be impressionistic? And should you, should each English line represent one Greek examiner line, you know, that tillic examiner? And what type of language is that compared to Greek? Is it exalted? Is it the Queen's English? Or is it Cockney? And you have to find that level of English. And there's about six different things that are mutually incompatible. So the translator must err. And Ladimor, err on the side of being literal. So if you read the Odyssey, the Iliad or Hesiod,
I think you get a 95% accuracy of what they actually wrote. If you read somebody like Robert Fitzgerald, it sounds more melodic and more maybe in the spirit of that poem. So, we got lots of questions on the Iliad and the Odyssey translations. So the best translation are Richmond, Ladimor and Robert Fitzgerald. Robert Fitzgerald. I still believe that Emily Wilson is the one that Nolan used for the audits. I don't know her. I know her work. She's a Princeton classics professor. It was a bold new translation, but it's not it's colloquial and it's kind of from a feminist, modernist point of view. Yes, and which brings me to sorry, Fred Lamaster's last question. Is the movie version of the Odyssey worth seeing? So, it might be you. It is in one level.
It is kind of like Batman. There's great special effects. Carribus, the whirlpool is pretty good. I didn't like the Cyclops. He looked like a naked Rodon figure. Cersei didn't look beautiful and sensual. She looked like she was a frumpy 55-year-old schooled. Calipso, who is also sexy and sensual, just sort of sits on the beach. Yeah, yeah. Athena, which is powerful and she always appears in the form of mentor or mintes that why she's kind of like his alter ego psychological. Lots of the early go. And then Odysseus, who is a product of the heroic age and is proud that he outtriced the Trojans and made them bring in the horse. That's not in the Odyssey, by the way.
That's in the Aeneid. And he offended the gods, is mended by eating the cattle of Helios, son of a Poseidon. So they all get shipwreck. Well, he kind of rose along with the crew and he's kind of like, wow. I tricked Portals sent on. I feel kind of guilty and I abused Hospitality with the Trojan horse. He's not a confident guy. He's enter. He's conflicted. He's problematic. He's a modern, neurotic creation. He's like Batman returns with Batman. Well, am I good or bad? Oh, I don't know. I mean, I'm kind of a free lancing villigilani, but I kind of do good, but I've got to leave the city and think this out. And the Mediterranean is an exciting, sunny, brilliant place. And the jeans, bright blue. And
if you're in there, sometimes it can be really windy and dangerous, suddenly. But this is like a Scottish downer, reminded me of Emily Bronte novel or something. It was wintery and dark. And boy, there's some beautiful ruins, not ruins, but castles that not play on and Plemutsi and Monobasia. And you look at Game of Thrones, you know, Dubrovnik. But these were like wreck, I released and Scottish, you know, and then I'd like the idea in the Odyssey. There's a nobility of dialect because these are nobles. Game of Thrones, I don't want to just keep referencing it. But when you see some of the creepy guys on the streets of the cities and they speak a cockney English. And then when you hear Circe talk to her brother, it's the Queen's
English. But there's no differentiation in the movie. They're all Americans at the mall. They're accents. You mean in the Odyssey? In the Odyssey. Yeah. In the movie of the Odyssey. There's no different. And the gods are the biggest problem. The gods in Homer and Greek mythology are big humans. And they don't die, but they're petty. He didn't give you enough sacrifice. I'll hit him with a thunderbolt. And they, and these are kind of neurotic mysticals in your side, your brain, or cosmic force. You don't see a real Poseidon causing these problems, which the Greeks did. And then finally, he got this idea of Sinia from Sinia as the Greek word for hospitality. So you guest friendship. Somebody comes into your home when he knocks on the door and says, I'm traveling to the Delphic Oracle. Come on in. Here's some leg of lamb. Here's an apple. Here's
some wine. Sleep in the corner. That's Sinia. But in this movie, it's an overarching theory that he creates. So that Odysseus violated the rules of Sinia by sending a gift into the walls of Troy, but it's not a gift. It's a weapon. Or they go into the Cyclops and they steal the wine. And they violated or he violates it by not giving them a nice welcome. So everything is reduced to that. But in truth, if you could talk to a eight century Greek and said, hey, Ajax, Agamemnon, Odysseus, if we build this wooden horse and put a bunch of warriors in and leave it on the beach and then take off and they're, we fold them to take it in the walls. And at night, they break out and open the gates. Does that violate Sinia? And they said, are you crazy? Of course it doesn't. You don't have Sinia with your enemies. That's a brilliant trick. That's a strategy. I'm a Greek word. So
there's a guy, Everett Wheeler, our classist. He, I don't think is a big fan of mine, but over the years, he's criticized a lot of things I've written. But he's a very careful scholar. He wrote a book called, basically in the title, Military Trickery. And he shows that that was a completely acceptable idea in addition to Hoplight Protocol. So the movie has all these flaws, is what I'm trying to say. Yeah. So is it fair to say that if you're looking for the Odyssey and interpretation of the Odyssey that's consistent with Homer's writing, it's not a good movie to go to. How about since movies are intended to be entertainment? Were you entertained? Just like Batman and ancient clothing. I like Batman. We turned. I thought those, I thought Chris Vernalyn's, it's funny. A lot of his earlier scenes and his movies, he duplicates again. And I mentioned that once before when you saw
Dunkirk and they're trapped in that hall and the bullets come through, he's taken that very scene and made it into the Trojan horse, where they're trapped in the Trojan horse and swords are plunged in the sides. And he's taken that gloomy from Batman, that gloomy, I don't know what you call that atmosphere. It looks kind of dingy and he's used that in this. And he's taken the idea that Batman is a conflicted hero and unsure of himself, makes him more human and he's done that in space with Odysseus. All right Victor, so we have one more break to take and then we'll come back and talk a little bit about sanity and civilization. Stay with us and we'll be right back. Every state is home to significant historic sites that tell the American story, but not every site is telling that story honestly and fairly. That's why the Heritage Foundation created the Heritage Guide Historic Sites. This interactive guide equips American citizens with the tools they need to enjoy
the sites that depict some of the greatest moments in our nation's history, analyzing them for historical accuracy and provides resources for families or educators planning a visit from Mount Vernon to Independence Hall to Gettysburg and more. Americans deserve transparency and sites that steward our history faithfully deserve our gratitude. The Heritage Guide to Historic Sites invites every American to rediscover the places and stories that define our nation, whether it's across the country or in your backyard. Visit historic sites dot heritage dot org to start your adventure today. Welcome back. Victor Davis Hansen in his own word. So we've got some very broad questions here at the end about Western civilization or the civilization as we see it now. This question comes from Brad Woods and he says your analysis of civilization has been
spectacular in your podcast. So he says the analysis is excellent, but some advice on how to maintain sanity and a civilization in decline would be immensely helpful. How do we stay sane in all this, Victor? I don't know. I feel sometimes we're living in the fifth century AD watching we're all in fortified enclaves like St. Augustine and the Forreston. It's all coming to an end. Watching the Roman Empire fall. Then I think maybe we're in the sixth century with just any an age and we're building Santa Sophia and we're building the just Indian law code and we're reforming we're saving the empire. Empire meaning the civilization. It's hard to know, but everybody each according to the station has to be an advocate for civilization. I'd mention this before I was at I was at in town at Home Depot and I bought some stuff and the cart was there and
I looked around. There's all the carts were all scattered and the place you put the carts was 150 yards away and it was very hot. I thought I'm just gonna leave it here. I thought if everybody did that it's just a breakdown because that's how people steal them so I went all the way over and did that and and when I walk around the farm I pick up trash when I the other day I was driving into town and I saw piece of metal right on the side of the road and I picked it up threw it away. Every little thing you can do to preserve the civilization is a weapon against chaos and decline and I don't know what's killing us is not being too mean or too rigid. It's too therapeutic. When you look at what is on the streets of Los Angeles and you see those tents and homeless people injecting,
fornicating your yournating and defecating and you hear that typhus is exploding and you see what it's done to the brilliant work of prior generation. It's a crime against nature and civilization what they're doing and we didn't have that problem when we were so called primitive before. We always make fun of the past but they didn't do that. They had what they called hobos that rode the rails and camped out by the railroad tracks but they didn't go into the cities and yet they tolerate that and they tolerate that because that's a mechanism for them to feel morally superior to somebody else at somebody else's expense. Karen Baes can talk about how wonderful she is and how you may but then she goes into that beautiful LA mansion free but she doesn't care about how a young mother and two children will step on a needle in a park. MacArthur's Park. So yeah, I don't know. But
every single thing you can do to be lawful, there were times I had no money and I never cheated in my income tax. I always thought you know what? File it on time, pay everything. It's not fair. California is killing us but when I hear people, especially a lot of immigrants, I know and they just everything is in cash. Victor, go to the bank and get cash because I can't do the work unless you pay me cash. If I were to say to Stanford, I need cash because that's double what I would make because I'm paying about 54% of my income in Obamacare, Social Security taxes, prescription, Social Security, A&B, Federal income tax and California 13 something. If I just said I want cash, nobody would think that would, the whole system would, but why do we have to pay cash for everything to get people to work? Yeah, it's a black market because they don't
say I'm very happy that he got rid of the tax on tips but I'm not sure people paid, reported all their tips, that's what I'm saying. I don't think it's going to make that big. We're $40 trillion in debt. We're a new way of calculating that. I thought it was really $32 trillion but $40 trillion, how are we going to get out of this? If everybody's not paying taxes and they're on 50% of the people in California don't pay income tax and yet they always, when I hear all these people saying, no, it's horrible and these people are doing this and doing this and they're going to cut this and what do you want compared to? We're spending 50% of our budget on entitlements, half the people in California, half the birds are on MediCal, 40% are on MediCal and everybody's, you can't get healthcare, you can't get healthcare in Europe, you can't get healthcare in Canada but believe me, I think since I had this cancer misdiagnosed last year and this year, I must have been
at 20 different places, doctors offices, labs, x-ray, CAT scan, PET, surgical, operating rooms, intensive care, you can name it. I can tell you that there were a lot of people there who had zero amount of money. I would say in the last two years I've heard five different languages spoken that people who didn't speak English and they got everything paid for and I get a letter every six weeks from Stanford Med and it says, and I get a status about what you owe and it says, if you can't pay this, we have ways to help you. Please contact us and this is a private Med Center so I don't, this whole idea that there's a limited amount of cash, Elon Musk owes us all this money and so does Jeff Bezos but not Rokana and not House on Piker,
just these other people and we're going to melt them and we want more stuff. Every time I listen to one of these socials, it's, give me, give me, give me, give me, give me, give me, give me. And then I think, well, why do I give you anything, House on Piker? You've got a million dollar home and a porth. Why, why, why don't you go out and donate your time and clean up the needles and Los Angeles, you know? So the society is, it's going to have to, it's going to go broke right now and then when it goes broke, it's going to get nasty because you'll get people who are completely unable to take care of themselves and the whole race thing has got into a tribal. They have no idea about the historical problem with identifying by your race. That is the great vein of identifying primarily by your race or your religion is accounts for about 60% of the death and wars. And this idea that you're going to go around and say, I don't like these people or I'm,
I'm black or I'm Chicano or I'm Asian or I'm, it doesn't work. And it's a very pre-civilizational idea. It's very dangerous too. Because it's very, everybody's fatigued about there so tired of somebody getting up in Congress on the evening news and saying, I did this and I went this and I went this. Especially when they only been here in one generation, you know? That's where I get really tired of it. Nixon when I hear her, it's always, these people did this to us and we're not going to take it anymore. And I need this and this and this or Shaballia or this. I need reparations. It'll never be solved. I'm warning you unless reparations are, we're warning you, we're warning you. What are you warning me? You don't have to warn me, you know? So don't come over to our country and then try to dismantle it. If it dismantled it and you had your way, it would look like your country. But we're not your country. We did things differently. So don't come over and take advantage of it and wanted to destroy it like you did your own country. Well, Victor, I would ask this last question,
but given what we're just talking about, it's going to be a little bit hard. We can end here or as you want. So Thomas Roost says, what do you think is the likelihood that the divisions in American society can be healed peacefully? I don't know. I'd say I'm hoping 70%. Comes in its periodic episodic. It's not always this way. You know who I blame more than anybody? Barack Obama because he was our first black president. He got more white votes. Let me say that again. He got more white votes in 2008 than white John Kerry did four years earlier in 2004. And yet as soon as all during that campaign, it was spread the wealth. Then Michelle, downright
mean country, never been proud before until Obama, Barack was nominated. They raised the bar on me. They always do this to me. And then Trevon's a son that I never had. And we all know the police deliberately go after black males, all lies. And before we knew it, and then he did something that I keep reiterating. We had affirmative action. It was kind of a joke at Cal State Fresno when I taught because I had a lot of students from India. And they'd say Professor Hansen, I tried to get affirmative action, but I'm darker than this black guy in your class. People make fun of me sometimes when I wear my traditional beard or something. And I get nothing. Or I it was kind of a joke where I had people from the Arab world. And they'd say I come from North Africa. Can I say I'm an African? And they couldn't, you know what I mean? But then he redefined that. And he said, I'm not
going to have a 12% black constituency. I'm going to have a 35 for our 30%. I'm going to say anybody who's not white is a victim. And he's on and I'm their champion. And they can get all sorts of, we won't call it a firm, we'll call it diversity. So suddenly class didn't matter. So I started looking at academia. And I started seeing all these people getting jobs on diversity. And I'm thinking that guy, that woman's dad on 7,000 acres, that guy right there, his parents are both orthodontists. That you know what I mean? But he's diverse. And it was all racial instead of class. And Obama did that. And he gendered up and he gendered up. And then he had Eric Holder. He unleashed my, I'm the, I'm a brox wingman. Remember that? And he just unleashed it. And then he, and then he had a needed Donna's communication director, oh my hero's mile. And it was just out of control. And it was racial, racial, and I mean, it got so that Michelle, they put her on ice.
If they let her out within two seconds, she revert to spec. It was race, race, race. Here's a woman who did not earn. I don't think on her SAT what she would have got, would she have gotten into Princeton if she was Sally Smith who was blonde and blue eyed. No, from Kansas. And she got into Harvard law. She got a lot. And I don't, we got rid of that. She's bright. She's well spoken. But she should have some idea that people were, were trying to make the effort to rectify past prejudice. And then when she got a law firm, they, but it was always this isn't enough. And these people look at me and they're racist. And, and then she would try to encourage racial animosity. And I, I don't know how you stopped that except the only thing I can tell the questioner to finish is everybody had, I hate to say it, but not that there's not racist now, but the word racist has lost
all of its currency. So if you're not acting in a racist capacity and someone calls you a racist, you should just say, go ahead, I don't care what you say has zero effect on me, zero effect on me. And yeah, you should just double down on whatever position you're taking on whatever issue it really is. Well, I had a person call me, I'd be very careful what I said and said, we don't think your podcast should be sponsored by Stanford anymore, Hoover. And I said, why? And I said, well, you're plain Dixie and you're glorifying confederate slavery. I said, no, I'm not. I'm playing the battle him other Republic. My eyes are seeing the glory of them. That was what Sherman's troops sang when they went through Georgia free slave. It was written as a biblical support of the union abolitionist cause. I said, well, we don't know about that. Well, we don't want you to continue. And I said, okay, fine, the best decision I ever made because I got a new audience and I like my audience and
I hope they like us. But the point is, if I said, oh, I'm sorry, if I didn't know the battle him other Republic might offend people, who's going to do that? Just so we all have to stand up and say, we're not going to be bullied by a bunch of half educated people. And we're not nothing to apologize for. You can tell that because Ilya and Omar chose to come here. AOC chose to come here. Shabalyeh came here on her own volition. Mondami's family were pretty well off with a mansion or a state on Lake Victoria, but they came here. Hassan Piker's family came here. El Sayyid came here. A lot. They can go. They didn't want to stay in the Middle East. They didn't want to stay in Somalia. They didn't want to stay in Puerto Rico. They didn't want to stay in Africa. They chose to come here. Now, why did they do that? Because somebody before they even came who has now dead plan the
interstate highway system or built the California aqueduct or built the Hoover Dam or who died at Iwo Jima or who charged right into a volley of Confederate bullets at Shiloh. And I'm not going to write all that contribution off and listen to these people, not in my lifetime. I even am going to tell them you are an in grade and you owe all these dead Americans that you slander that can't answer to create this wonderful country that drew you here and you're parasitic because you take, take, take and you criticize, but you don't give back. And you say that you're morally superior because you're interested in social justice. We've seen what your social justice is. It's on the streets of Los Angeles. It's in the murder rate in Chicago. It's not being able to walk until recently in Washington, DC. It's letting people out three or four times that are here illegal every day that kill or rape some innocent person. It was final rant. There was a story and I
don't know if it has any credence. I think Benny Johnson, the conservative activist blogger, somebody sent it to me and he made the argument that one of the reasons why the deportations are going up is ice is getting stealthy hell from blue state sanctuary cities. In other words, as the midterms and the 20th 28 elections are coming out and as people see these high profile murders of innocence by illegal aliens and we're seeing them every day or why they see truck drivers unleashed with the aren't qualified to drive. They think this is a border issue even though the border is closed and it hurts them. So what they're doing is if you follow what he's claiming is they do something like this. I'm a governor of Washington or I'm the mayor of Denver and I hate ice and word
sanctuary cities but by the way there's a couple of murders we just picked up and our judges will probably let them out and they might kill somebody hurt my campaign. So would you please come over at four o'clock in the afternoon on Tuesday when they get out on bail and grab them because they're here illegally. I don't know if that's true but that's what he's that they're able to deport a record number of people because they're getting implicit help stealthily though it be from blue state official. So on that note which is a little bit optimistic thank you Victor that the very end there that least we know that people are interested in law and order after all is said and done we'd like to thank our audience for joining us and thank you Victor for all of the everybody for listening and viewing. This is Sammy Wink and Victor Davis Hanson and we're signing off. Thank you for tuning in to the Daily Signal. Please like share and subscribe to be notified for more content like this. You can also check out my own website at victorhanson.com and subscribe
for exclusive features in addition.
More episodes
More from Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words

Victor Davis Hanson: The Terrifying Power of Artificial Intelligence
Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words

Victor Davis Hanson: The 25th Anniversary of 9/11
Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words

Victor Davis Hanson: Why Europe Is Turning Against Mass Immigration
Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words

Victor Davis Hanson: Modern ‘Art’ Is Separating Man from Meaning feat. Sculptor...
Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words