用理性看待“子午冲”说法 - Viewing the 'Ziwu Clash' Rationally [HSK 5]

Online articles exaggerate the risks of the Bingwu year Ziwu clash. We should distinguish information rationally and focus on real life.

Download the app here:

• Chinese Short Dialogue | Website
• Chinese Short Dialogue | App Store
• Chinese Short Dialogue | Google Play

Available in 8 languages on the app:

Chinese Listening | 중국어 리스닝 | 中国語リスニング | Аудирование по китайскому языку | Nghe tiếng Trung | Mendengarkan bahasa Mandarin | Escucha en chino | การฟังภาษาจีน | Chinesisches Hören | Écoute du chinois | Ascolto cinese | Audição em chinês | चीनी सुनना | الاستماع إلى اللغة الصينية

《English Translation》

小潘: Teacher Liu, I read an article today saying that the Bingwu year in 2026 will bring lots of bad things, and especially warns people with 'Zi Water' to be careful. I feel a little scared.
刘娜: Don't worry just yet. Those kinds of articles are mostly based on metaphysical ideas; much of the content is exaggerated or hyped and has no scientific basis.
小潘: But it was very specific, like changing jobs, arguing, getting sick—it sounds like those things will really happen.
刘娜: Those things can happen in any year, which is why the article seems 'accurate.' When we study Chinese, we should also learn to tell information apart.
小潘: I see. So how should I understand this kind of content?
刘娜: You can treat it as a cultural phenomenon. There are many sayings in Chinese tradition about the Five Elements and Heavenly Stems and Earthly Branches, mostly meant to remind people to be cautious, not to predict fate.
小潘: That makes me feel less afraid. So when the article says 'use stillness to overcome movement,' does it mean I should stay calm?
刘娜: Yes, that phrase is actually very practical in life. No matter the year, keeping calm, planning well, and paying attention to health are always beneficial.
小潘: I understand now. Instead of focusing on metaphysics, I should focus on my studies and real life.
刘娜: That's right. What truly changes your year is your own choices, not the 'clash' described in articles. You're already making great efforts.