
About this episode
Evidence and research are at the heart of current SoR mandates. Yet little time and few resources are provided to enable teachers to understand exactly what these terms mean. Worse, it is assumed that teachers must allow the “experts” to read and explain “the research” for them. This patronizing paradigm serves to further chip away at teachers’ autonomy in favor of dependence and subservience. This presentation will use the context of a study by Linnea Ehri (2007) to demonstrate how to read and evaluate a research article. It also demonstrates common tricks and buzzwords used to misinterpret and misrepresent research. This in turn enhances participants ability to be responsible consumers of educational research and research-based claims.
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Reading Instruction Show publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The Reading Instruction Show

Quiet, Piggy: A Trumpian Response to Science of Reading Critics
The Reading Instruction Show

Recognizing Words, the Three-Cueing System, and Identifying Words
The Reading Instruction Show

How NAEP Created a Perpetual Reading Crisis
The Reading Instruction Show

Reading and the Information Processing Model: Why Penguins Continue to Mishear W...
The Reading Instruction Show