Activist judges block vaccine injury transparency

Well, come to the untold, take it deep breath, take the higher road, that's why they always say, as if they know the way, they won't take it from me.

But don't ever doubt yourself by swiping just a drain, you made your own so kick and scream.

The people will lie with a never-ending force, you never have the chance, so watch your waiting for it.

This is come, my friend, cause this is one.

It's time and this is one.

Why are nurses so interested in politics and court rulings?

Politics and healthcare have been a controversial combo for my entire adult life.

I remember back in the 1990s when First Lady Hilary Clinton was going to be put in charge of some sort of federalized universal healthcare system that was nicknamed Hilary Care.

Thank God that didn't happen.

When I started as a nurse, I didn't want to care about these things.

What impact do they even have at the patient bedside and at the level of population health?

With that in mind, I'm your host, nurse David Lane. My background is in hospital psychiatry and I'm a fired COVID dissident nurse joined today by Ashley Grog.

Hey Dave, it's great to be here. You know, Nicole and I are big into politics. This is what we do in our spare time for fun.

I mean, both of us have fought at our legislature. This year, I'm pretty excited to say we did have a bill pass in Indiana that says some medical professional students cannot be denied clinical placement based on vaccination status.

And that was a huge win. It won't go in effect until July. But if you're a nursing student, this is something you're worried about. Come to India.

I mean, I'll be friends with you and we'll have a great time.

And we are going to resuscitate nursing, also author of resuscitating nursing, get it on Amazon. But yeah, 20 years in the health care field definitely never thought I'd be involved in politics.

Strong work, Ashley. How about you, Nicole?

Well, to follow that, you know, it's same kind of right. Ashley and I are kind of twins in that sense.

Being in the cardiac field for about two decades, you know, I still practice in the hospital and I'm really big into the local and state politics.

If you will, when it comes to medical freedoms and what that looks like from a public health standpoint, also as a health care worker and really trying to get people to be motivated, right?

To want to participate in government and like like both of you says this is nothing I ever thought in a million years that I would be involved in.

So I'm really looking forward to the topic today because it is something that I think a lot more people need to hear about and kind of see where we're coming from and why it's so important to be involved.

So let's do it. Unfortunately, as a psych nurse, I learned more about the medications that I was giving to patients on a daily basis from unsealed court documents than I did directly from my nursing textbooks.

As it turns out, a lot of the time the truth is in the court documents, not in what is essentially farm marketing propaganda that ends up getting printed under the title of a nursing textbook.

As for politics, I won my hospital's Excellence in Nursing Award and then was fired via COVID vaccine mandate.

The leadership at my hospital were rabid liberals. They went to BLM rallies. They started a hospital DEI program.

My termination papers said we have denied your request for an exemption to COVID vaccination. You are being terminated for being unvaccinated.

When I filed for unemployment through the state of Wisconsin, I thought process there was unemployment isn't paid by taxpayers. It's paid by your former employer, so it was kind of a way to stick it to them.

But the state of Wisconsin decided, you voluntarily resigned. You weren't terminated. Even though they had all the emails that said my exemption was denied and I was being terminated, they had in writing that I was terminated for being unvaccinated.

But it was liberals from top to bottom who did that. At the time, I wasn't even sure I would ever work as a nurse again.

And it was because of Democrats at the local, state, and federal levels all the way up.

So I'm not complaining though because what I've endured is nothing. Nothing compared to the vaccine injured or the people who have been harmed by psychiatric medications.

That's why I care about politics and court cases. Nicole, thoughts or comments at this time?

Well, I think it's a really good subject. Again, you know, this is something that we continue to run into, post pandemic, and something that unfortunately is affecting a lot more people who have been adversely affected by vaccines, not just the COVID-19 vaccine.

And so I think it's really unfortunate that we're here. I have a lot of people that I work with in the vaccine injured community and they have really serious adverse outcomes from it and have a very poor quality of life.

And so knowing that the government has implemented this and that there is nothing being done to help these people and they're continuing to get worse.

And dying off is something that we need to continue to talk about and why we continue to fight on a local, state, and federal level.

I know you've been very involved in an important case that we're specifically interested in down in Florida and we are going to get into that in some depth later in this episode.

But we're going to kind of set the stage here by talking about the ACIP, which is the advisory committee on immunization practices because they were scheduled to meet in March of 2026.

And on the docket for discussion in that meeting was COVID vaccine injuries and also diagnosis codes.

These are very controversial topics for some people and we know that they were on the docket for discussion because of a leak that happened from the ACIP to an independent journalist.

Her name is Maryanne Dimassi. Maryanne Dimassi is not just an independent journalist, she is also a doctor and she does amazing work as an independent journalist.

Speaking of lawsuits, speaking of court cases and court documents, her work gave us a lot of fuel for our episodes on Gardasil.

That was Maryanne Dimassi releasing court documents to the public.

We also did an episode that touched on a journal being sued because of their refusal to retract a paper about the safety of giving antidepressants to children that was proved beyond any doubt to be a fraud.

But this journal refuses to retract it and so now the journal is getting sued. Maryanne Dimassi is the one who has covered that in depth.

So a little interesting wrinkle about how all this unfolded is that Maryanne Dimassi had the scoop on this and then the New York Times swooped in, stole her story, published their own version of it and didn't credit her at all, did not even mention that they stole her work.

That was an interesting little wrinkle. Do either of you give any credence to anything you read in the New York Times anymore?

I see both shaking your heads. Ashley, do you want to elaborate?

It's just so ridiculous. Everything you can see the bias and the hatred and the absolute ignorance towards facts anymore when I read it.

I'm like, okay, I'm going to read just a little bit farther because the headlines are so misleading from what is in the body and the way that they say things to kind of disguise the truth.

And it's just so frustrating and irritating that I don't even see a point in reading why like why it doesn't make any sense.

No, I think it is sometimes entertaining to read it just to see what the latest propaganda is, but that's all the value that it really adds to the conversation at this point.

Yeah, I agree. And it's so great that we have people who are willing to risk everything and bring us the truth, not only in journalism, but by releasing these court documents and that takes a lot of guts and I really appreciate the fact that people are willing to do that.

And I look forward to the more we realize that this is happening, the more we realize the power we hold in our different industries and can bring these things to light, the more difficult it's going to be for them to hide in the shadows, right?

I mean, we've gotten to a point where independent journalists like Mary and Demasi have a bigger audience than CNN and SNBC.

I mean, people recognize that they're being lied to, they recognize the propagandists and they're drawn to the truth.

And with that in mind, I'd actually like to share with you so we can hear from Mary and Demasi herself.

Hi, everyone. I'm Mary and Macy and this is Andy Reports.

For the first time, a US federal vaccine advisory group has formally acknowledged systemic failures in how COVID-19 vaccine injuries have been diagnosed and treated in the United States.

MD reports has obtained exclusive access to a policy document that will go before the CDC's vaccine advisory panel ACIP next week.

The document was authored by the COVID-19 vaccine work group led by MIT professor Retsf Levy.

It states plainly that existing vaccine safety systems don't reliably identify, diagnose or follow people who develop persistent illness after COVID-19 vaccination,

leaving many patients without appropriate care or follow-up.

For years, people with vaccine injuries have been shuffled through the medical system.

They bounce from doctor to doctor and get dismissed, misdiagnosed or told their symptoms are just a coincidence.

The work group formally recognizes a condition called post-acute COVID-19 vaccination syndrome defined as symptoms persisting for at least 12 weeks after vaccination that cannot be explained by other causes.

That recognition marks a clear departure from previous vaccine policy.

The document also proposes three major reforms to vaccine injury surveillance, clinical recognition and long-term care.

If adopted, these reforms would mark the most consequential shift in vaccine injury oversight in decades.

Those recommendations will now go before ACIP for a vote on March 18-19.

I've examined what these developments mean for patients, for doctors and for vaccine oversight in the United States.

You can read the full analysis and download the policy document on my sub-stack MD reports.

Just click on the link below and subscribe.

Well, I guess, first of all, I'll call myself out for singing her praises while simultaneously mispronouncing her name.

Mary Ann Demacy, not Mary Ann Demacy, but I guess I kind of have a history of that.

Okay, so she mentioned a lot of interesting things in that little blurb.

And one of the ones that I'm excited to learn more about was about diagnosis codes.

That is what stood out to me.

What stood out to either you in particular?

Well, I am familiar with the conversation about the ICD codes because this is something that was discussed with Cody's law,

which is the bill proposal that Heather Hudson, the mother of Cody Hudson, wanted to present.

And in order to be able to identify that vaccine injuries actually exist, you have to have an ICD code.

So it's wild to me that this entire time there has been a COVID diagnosis, which is what everybody's been put under,

which is why it's so difficult to be able to extract the accurate data to show if it's someone who actually had COVID versus maybe a vaccine injury.

So to know that the partnership with React 19, who had been working with us on a Florida level,

brought it to the federal level to help and was going to bring the very first ICD code for the COVID 19 vaccine injury.

And so I think it's huge.

Some people don't think that this is a big deal, but this is absolutely huge to know that this can be implemented.

It is such a huge, huge deal and people's eyes might glaze over when they hear things like diagnosis codes.

But this isn't just important for tracking vaccine injuries.

This is such an important piece of the overall picture that is incredibly important for people to understand.

I actually did an entire episode with our other host, Melissa.

Gosh, it's been a year or two ago already about diagnosis codes because of how critical they were in the overall course of the pandemic.

And I do really want to take a minute to unpack that just a little bit because it's a good example of how what happened during COVID wasn't accidental.

It wasn't the chaos of a pandemic. This was all carefully planned out.

So diagnosis codes, also known as ICD-9 or most recently ICD-10 codes are plugged into hospital software by providers and they are used for insurance buildings.

So basically there's an international standard that is set and everybody kind of agrees to this disease gets this diagnosis code.

And it's a way not just to build insurance, but also for people to track diseases at the population level because you can look in these large healthcare provider databases and look at trends, look at things like that.

So for me as a psych nurse to give one example, there are about 70 different diagnosis codes for various forms of depression, like seasonal depression or major depressive disorder single episode or blah, blah, blah.

It goes on and on and on. They have an incredible number of options to be able to have some nuance with the diagnosis.

Now during the COVID pandemic, we had the opposite of nuance and it was intentional.

We had a single diagnosis code for COVID-19 infection, U07.1.

Why that is so critically important to understand is because it made it impossible to distinguish people who were hospitalized with COVID or from COVID.

So for me on my psych unit, we would swab every single admission somebody who came in to the psych unit for being suicidal would be swabbed for COVID even though they don't have so much as the sniffles.

And if they swabbed positive by these tests that gave a false positive half the time, they were counted as a COVID hospitalization and our system was intentionally structured that we would not have any nuance with that.

And it was a way for them to game the data to push their propaganda to make people get on board with masking mandates, with the entire economy being shut down, with schools being locked down and with COVID mandates.

It was essential for all of that to happen for them to game the data by setting that diagnosis code like that.

And a person might wonder Dave, when you say they, who exactly do you mean?

Well, in the US, the implementation of diagnosis codes comes from the CMS Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Now, if they were the ones who actually came up with those diagnosis codes, we could FOIA them and find out, but we can't.

Why can't we find out? Well, it's because they get their marching orders from the World Health Organization.

You can't FOIA the World Health Organization. We're not able to see their emails or meeting minutes to find out why they specifically chose to game the data like that.

But we do know from the recent release of all these Epstein emails that Epstein and the bankers he was involved involved with and people like Bill Gates and the people who planned pandemics, they were talking about that as early as 2013.

They were talking about planning for an upcoming pandemic. So we're talking Gates, we're talking Anthony Fauci, we're talking Jeffrey Epstein, all these people and people in their circles.

We're talking about planning for a pandemic back then and the World Health Organization was the mechanism by which they implemented so much.

It was the same people responsible for the creation of the virus who also ended up being in charge of the pandemic response.

A charitable person might look at all the mistakes that happened over the course of COVID and say, well, it was chaotic and mistakes were made, but it is critical to understand that no mistakes were made.

That everything that happened was carefully planned out for years and years by globalists, by pedophiles, by these people who want to be our technocratic overlords, by authoritarians.

All right, I've been ranting for a while. I got a tag one of you and who wants to pick up on me.

Yeah, it's absolutely wild. I'm not going to, you know, I'm not going to continue to state the obvious.

I want to point back to the COVID injuries because we look at this and we see that there's only one diagnosis code for COVID.

It forced them to catalog all these people regardless of what was going on with them clinically into one pigeonhole.

And I think that that's what we've seen too. If we, if we look back and we just look at how things have happened historically and we see how all of these, not all of them, but a majority of these individuals who are vaccine injured joined long COVID groups.

They went in and they joined long COVID groups because they weren't being censored. We hear about how terrible long COVID is and how this is such a big problem.

But if long COVID is the only way that you can get treatment, is that what you're going to say? Heck yeah.

Rather than being gaslit, beaten down, you're going to say long COVID. And so it's going to be really interesting to see how this will shift.

I mean, I don't think that there's going to be a big shift in physicians because I think they're still going to carry the moral injury and the weight of the fact that a lot of them push these vaccines.

A lot of them refuse to acknowledge for a very long time. And still to this day, most, you know, most of these mainstream doctors are not going to acknowledge COVID vaccine injury.

Is it going to change anything is having this diagnosis? You know, it's going to be really interesting to see.

Number one, if the government is actually going to do this and as soon as that comment period opens up, I hope everybody is watching react 19's page, go follow them on all the social media.

But as soon as that comment period opens up, everybody needs to go make a comment, no joke, like everyone needs to step up because this needs to be acknowledged.

These people need help and we need to start cataloging some of the damage because like Nicole said, these people are unfortunately dying. And once they're gone, it's lost a history.

Bring up important points, Ashley and Nicole, let's have what's here your thoughts at this point.

Well, I mean, aside from the fact that we're trying to ensure that these individuals are being identified, right? This is a big right because it's such a taboo thing.

There are physicians that are being crucified, pigeonholed. They were reported back in the day and still could be if they are going to say that these people are actually vaccine injured.

It's so important that we have this so we can identify them, right? And once we can identify them, then the next step would be allowing these physicians to practice medicine.

They'd be able to get this ICD code out. And then what happens is is the idea is that now Medicare and Medicaid can look at it and see if we can have treatment, right?

There can be things now that possibly we can attach to a diagnosis code to allow other things, medications, interventions, et cetera, testing to happen now because we actually have a diagnosis whereas right now it's all over the place. They're not being identified.

Well, the problem is the doctors have to be on board with it and that goes back to what Ashley was talking about. The doctors were so propagandized that these vaccines are safe and effective.

Does it even matter that now years and years later after people already got their first dose and received their injury that doctors are finally going to have a place in the software to acknowledge it was a vaccine injury?

I don't see that happening in mass. I think these doctors have the binders on there still the most propagandized people in our society.

The information they're getting from their medical journals is going to completely contradict everything that the ACIP is saying even if they do eventually get these diagnosis codes added Ashley.

I think one of the things that we could see is, you know, the ICD code gets put into place and then we have these clinics that will accept.

Why can't we have clinics for the vaccine injured? The way that we have clinics for, quote, men's health or women's health or GLP ones.

We need to do an episode on these pop-up health clinics sometime soon. That's for another day.

But hopefully what we will see is we will see some of these doctors shift into a place where they're like, okay, you know what?

I've been seeing this. This has been acknowledged. This has been talked about. I'm going to go ahead and put these ICD 10 codes in for a vaccine injury.

The problem is is before we can get to the point where we can start, you know, making some connections.

We're going to have to find somebody in the government who's willing to do the research.

Right. And what data are they going to use because they're data chains are so broken.

You know what? We have to remember one step at a time. We really have to remember and I encourage the listeners, even though we're all going to get wound up over this episode.

We have to remember one step at a time. And this is a huge step. We need to get this, when this comment period comes up, everybody needs to dive in.

I think Nicole has something to add.

I mean, just really quickly, we have a lot of people, especially on Florida, who have clinics, who have been trading the injured, but they have to do so in a roundabout way.

And so the comment that you made about having the clinics, I think there are a lot more than maybe we know of and they're grasping to try to help these people.

But when you don't have a diagnosis code and you don't have a way to properly charge, if you will, you then run into issues with things being more costly.

And that's part of the issue with the injured. A lot of them cannot work or they have modified work.

They've lost a lot of income and then trying to seek treatment that's not within an insurance plan, if you will, or being covered drains them of everything.

And then obviously gets them behind and why they're so sick. And at this point, you know, they're not able to get appropriate medications or right now a lot of them use IVIG.

These are thousands and thousands of dollars, you know, some of these medications from overseas are being given to vaccine injured, but not FDA approved here.

So our vaccine injured here can't get them unless they travel across the pond, if you will. And who can afford that? They're too sick to travel.

So it's a much bigger deal than people understand. And if we can at least start the ICD code and make sure everybody understands the importance of that, I think it could open the door for more things to come.

It could open the door to have a more diagnosis codes for these vaccine injuries.

We know because Pfizer and the FDA lost the lawsuits regarding releasing the Pfizer clinical trial. That I remember our FDA sat on the same side of the courtroom as Pfizer and argued that the clinical data shouldn't be released for 75 years.

And they lost that and hats off to Naomi Wolf, whose team at DailyCloud.io went through a lot of the papers that were released.

Pfizer had documented thousands of side effects to their vaccine in their clinical trial. And we know that a lot of these are just openly acknowledged at this point internationally from various regulators such as myocarditis, such as menstrual changes, such as pots.

So do either of you have any guesses how many ICD 10 codes, how many diagnosis codes currently exist for COVID vaccine injuries?

Zero.

Zero. There are none. There are none. Why? Because these systems are totally hijacked by absolute pharma ghouls. So this meeting is so so important for all those reasons.

But guess what? An activist judge jumped in and shut the meeting down. We will explain why after this short break, we will be right back.

Let's get real. Let's get loud on America loud talk news. Yes, this is Dr. Peter McCullough, and I'm personally inviting you to join me in Nashville until I second, third and fourth for historic experience in 2026.

America loud news, 250 slash 10 Nashville. Along with clear and the wellness company, we're celebrating two big milestones, 250 years of America and 10 years of America loud news.

I'm calling all Patriots to this historic weekend with inspiring entertainment, incredible fireworks and nationally recognized speakers who proudly stand for freedom. I would love to see you there because your presence matters and you are family now is the time to get together and weekend.

Exchange ideas, answer your questions and enjoy fellowship. Join us and register now on America loud dot news forward slash Nashville. That's America loud dot news forward slash Nashville. We'll see you there.

I'm Dr. Kelly Victory with the wellness company and I know this personally. I exercised a to healthy diet and had no symptoms when a routine mammogram resulted in a cancer diagnosis.

It revealed a hard truth. Even healthy people can get cancer and much of modern medicine is reactive, not preventative. So I began asking a different question.

What can we do daily to support the body before something goes wrong? That question led me to formulate shield. Shield is a two-part nutraceutical system designed to support immune balance, antioxidant defense and cellular health.

A chemical-free cocoa mix and soft gels containing medicinal mushrooms, turmeric, green tea extract, olive leaf, burberry and black seed oil, prevention is power.

Visit TWC dot health slash out loud and use code out loud for an exclusive discount.

Are you looking for a healthy snacks? But you've had enough of all the sweet sugary energy bars? Good news. There's new bars to try.

That savory crunchy and packed with goodness. Bare bars are based just on six simple natural ingredients. A certified organic veggie nut and seed bar.

That's low temp dried. Never baked or fried. Bare bars are plant-based, gluten-free and loaded with nutrients and protein.

Head over to barebar.com slash out loud and get the exclusive discount just for America out loud listeners. That's B-E-A-R-B-A-R dot com forward slash out loud.

During COVID, we got educated on the power of natural virus protection and immune boosting using vitamins A, C, D, zinc and quercetin.

The problem? Getting them at the right dosage from truly natural sources that doesn't cost an arm and a leg.

Enter the daily V-Stack. Using breakthrough cellular absorption technology, we put those vitamins together and supercharged them with a complete multi-mineral complex.

The daily V-Stack is basically an oral IV of six products all in one at an affordable price.

Go to chemicalfreebody.com forward slash out loud today, get the daily V-Stack, protect yourself, boost your immune system and save 20% on your first order.

Oral hygiene hasn't changed in 50 years, but our diet and the way we eat has, creating an environment in your mouth for bacteria to wreck havoc on your teeth and gums.

For better oral health, get Sprite, dental defense and oral care line designed to combat acid creating bacteria.

The toothpaste, mouthwashments and gum all contain xylitol and natural ingredients shown to dramatically improve oral health.

Sprite can be found online and at all find natural retailers.

I'm Doug Evans, author of The Sprout Book and I've devoted my life to helping people reconnect with food at its most alive stage, The Sprout.

When you germinate a seed, you're not just growing food, you're activating potential. Sprouts grow without soil, sunshine or fertilizer right on your kitchen countertop.

They're organic, fresh and cost less than a dollar serving. Its nature's fastest form of farming accessible to anyone, anywhere.

Discover the joy of growing your own food and the power of living nutrition.

Visit the SproutingCumby.com and use the code Out Loud for an exclusive offer.

Welcome back to this episode of The Nurses Report.

I'm your host, Nurse David Wayne, joined today by nurses Ashley and Nicole and we are talking about a very important meeting at the advisory council for immunization practices at the CDC.

This meeting was going to address the incredibly important issues of diagnosis codes and vaccine injuries.

We were stoked about it because this is so long overdue. There are so many people that have been egregiously harmed.

They're committing suicide. They're not getting good medical care and we don't have good medical data, population level data, all because these systems were intentionally biased by bad actors to avoid generating data that makes their product look unsafe.

That is an old playbook that we talk about all the time with these pharmacandals is that they gaslight and propagandize both doctors and the public to believe that a product's side effects are rare and then they make it so that you don't have good data about the actual prevalence of side effects.

Usually they're sitting on good data that they never released to the public and every now and then we get a glimpse of it because lawsuits happen.

So that's kind of the theme of this episode is the court cases, the lawsuits and the law fair being waged by activist judges that ends up shutting some of this stuff down.

Right before this meeting was about to happen, an activist judged intervened. His name was Brian E. Murphy. He is the US district judge for the district of Massachusetts.

He was a Biden and pointee who was confirmed in December 2024 right at the end of Biden's presidency is probably an auto pen judge.

I'm sure Biden couldn't remember this guy's name 30 seconds after he heard it, but this guy gets on the judicial bench and it's really important to point out that a lot of Trump's nominations to various judicial benches are not being seated because there is this agreement in place called a blue slip rule where if a state has a Democrat senator that senator can just without any hearing without any reason that needs to be public.

Can just veto and just veto the president's judicial nominations what we see is that our court system is being completely taken over by radicals and it's not just because of Democrats.

It's not just because of Soros funding. It's because of spineless and weak and complicit Republicans who are on board with all of this.

So, you know, early in the episode I made a joke about Hillary Clinton being a demon and I stand by that by the way, but at the same time this is not a Democrat versus Republican issue.

This is kind of a uniparty issue because the Republicans are just as complicit in all these crimes as the Democrats have been for as bad as the Democrats are.

The Republicans enable it. The Republicans participate in it. The reason that acts blue isn't being prosecuted and dug into now that Republicans are in powers because they do the exact same thing with win red.

And if you go down the line, they're all crooks and liars and that's why that's why we can't have nice things. All right, I don't want to derail the episode more about that.

Nicole, what are your thoughts here?

I mean, I echo your sentiments. It's really actually it's kind of scary to think that one judge can derail so much and set us back.

And I think that's what we really need to talk about is that that's how this is allowed to just set forth the precedent to basically negate everything that the public that's wild, right?

Okay, so that's yeah, that's the issue I have actually.

I think it's important to touch on what Nicole just said. Set a precedent. Why is that important prior to getting involved in politics and starting to really get involved?

The precedence is one of the reasons that I really got involved because once something happens, you know, in life, once you go down a certain path, it tends to repeat itself.

In the court system, we don't actually go off of the Constitution, kind of terrifying. We go off of case precedent, ruling precedent.

And if you go through and you read this judge is ruling, he goes back and sites case after case after case.

And you can look at that through that lens of this radicalized judge and you can make that look however you want.

And as I was reading the ruling, that's what I that's what I saw is he was just taking and using these things to his advantage or to the AAP's advantage.

Or I mean, really, let's just call it what it is to farmers advantage and that's what we see over and over.

So paying attention and understanding why these cases are so important is because it sets precedence so crazy.

And this judge already set a precedent because this is one of the exact same judges that issued a nationwide injunctions against the Trump administration from deporting violence.

Illegal immigrants, this judge decided, you know what? I have more power than the president. I am stopping this across the entire country.

And his ruling got appealed up to the Supreme Court and even the liberal judges on the Supreme Court issued what lawyers would call a bench slap.

They said, no, you do not have that power. What are you doing? Knock it off. What did this judge do? He did it again.

He did it again. It went back up to the Supreme Court again and the even the liberal judges on the Supreme Court called him defiant.

And yet, weak and impotent Republicans in Congress refused to impeach him. Congress, which has a Republican majority right now, could invoke their impeachment powers to remove this judge from the bench.

And they don't. And you can speculate as to why, but now he's weighed in. He's weighed in on this issue. Either you want to add.

So is that a call to action that we need to issue is just contacting your Congress people and requesting that they remove this guy?

That might work if Congress people cared about what they don't care.

No, look at look at the Save Act, which has something like 80% overall public approval. And we still can't get it through legislation.

I mean, that is an incredible, that is incredible bipartisan support in this day and age. And we can't get it through because Republicans are just as bad as Democrats.

It's the uniformity and the people we vote into office couldn't give a crap less about what the people actually want.

We still have to push though. I think it's one of those things that, you know, you're right. It's frustrating. It's infuriating. There's a lot of things that are not kind of going our way.

We talked about it before, even the show started a day when I were like, this is just a, it's a mess. Like there's so much chaos, right?

All of these things you think are going to happen. Mahan, you know, make America great and just, you know, really trying to put forth good things for Americans that for so long have been completely ignored.

And now everybody's doing like nothing. It just seems like they're doing it exactly the opposite. But I think I think more than nothing like literally the opposite works.

You were in the right direction, but I wouldn't have done this or that differently. It's they're doing literally the exact opposite.

So what do we do as citizens? I mean, what do we do? Well, people, patriots, you know, people that want good things to happen for our country, you know, it's like there's got to be something that people get engaged, get involved.

They have the time is going to pass. So like Ashley, although it can seem very ominous, we should really put something out there for people to feel empowered.

Doing nothing is not going to do anything anyways, you know, but at least if you try, maybe, you know, Ashley thoughts on that.

I think the reaching out to your Congress congressional representatives and I hate federal politics, but what is a senator and a representative is the same as at the state level, right?

It should be like maybe four phone calls at the most. And I think if we just take a couple minutes, make those phone calls.

You're going to leave a voicemail. Maybe you send an email. You can say you did your part on that. I mean, it's going to take a lot more to get out these entrenched bureaucrats that we have in there.

They are just literally signing on the dotted line. They're not actually using their brains, but we do have to try something because we can't keep letting this stuff happen.

You know that the left would be raging and psychotic and supporting their people in there. And I think that that's one place where we fail is, you know, we are not as rabid and energized.

Shall we say as the left. And so, you know, that leaves people who want to do good, vulnerable. So it's not going to fix it or change it right now.

But the more you realize that yes, you can use your voice and the more we're engaged, the stronger and better we're going to become so.

Yeah, absolutely. Sorry to be so doom and gloom about it. You do definitely need to stay involved and back to back to this judge.

This judge decided that RFK Jr. does not have the right to decide who works for him. This judge believes that unelected bureaucrats like him should have more power

regarding government personnel decisions than the executive branch, which is explicitly empowered by the Constitution itself to personnel decisions.

It's literally what it's for. And this guy's like that. That his partners in crime are the American Academy of Pediatrics. They're actually the ones who filed this lawsuit that he ended up ruling on.

So just a reminder, this is the same American Academy of Pediatrics who continues to endorse the mutilation of children under the guys of so-called gender affirming care.

They sued RFK Jr. after he fired the prior members of the ACIP who were all unscientific ghouls who were happy to help Pfizer,

Merck and Blacksoe profit off of the piles of dead children's bodies that their products were creating.

The AAP has released their own childhood vaccine schedule that contradicts the CDC. One might call them clownish, but demonic would be more fitting.

This judge has used a law called the Federal Advisory Committee Act or FACA and essentially ruled that the ACIP is not allowed to meet until he and the AAP personally approve of its members.

Apparently, apparently this is what his rationale is. I'm ready for you. I know, I'm totally ragebating you. It's just like.

This can't be real. This can't be real. This can't be real.

Does this make sense that somebody can say one of the most corrupt organizations that first of all does not have governing rule, the AAP does not. Am I correct?

No, no, the AAP is, whatever they once were, whatever the AAP once was, their current embodiment is they are farma ghouls and authoritarian.

You know, there's no bipartisan. They were found in it, but that's what they are now. They're not a governmental agency

No, and they shouldn't be allowed to have such control over this with some rando

Judge who's making these decisions on behalf of we all said it earlier big pharma at this point

And knowing how many people are affected by this because they they now halted the vaccine schedule

That was going to be you know, and then and then now the stuff with the vaccine injured that was finally going to come out

Coincidentally, you know, those all along the vaccines

So that should make everybody wonder why are they making such an effort to hush and halt all of this

You don't you don't want to hear the stories

I personally know three people that were supposed to testify for the asip. They don't want these stories out

Why is that why do you not want to hear it if you don't believe that exists? What's the harm, right?

So it's a joke. They're all a freaking joke

They're all a joke and this is going to be litigated over the next coming months

But what's also happening over the next coming months? We've got a midterm election that's coming up

And it is looking like

Republicans are going to get trounced trounced and what happens then then the impeachments start and they are

Explicitly planning out already the law fair that they are going to wage against our of cage junior

Other people in the Trump administration, you know people within the Democrat establishment like JB Pritzker are proud to publicly talk about the law fair

They are planning against personally against members of the Trump administration to try and put them in prison

This isn't about like our ideas one out in the election

They are coming to put people in prison the people who are standing

Between you and a needle between your child and a needle they want them in prison

And let's also just take a moment to acknowledge the hypocrisy

That these are the same people who

Spent what half a century chanting my body my choice and now this is what we get from them actually

Rules for the but not for me. We can radicalize the government. We can lock you down

We can you know coerce and force you into getting a vaccine

We can say that you should die

Because you didn't choose to do what we say with your body

But heaven forbid we make it

shared decision making versus

uh

Recommendation which you know they also make it seem like required in that that is the most insane part about all of this is

It's completely fine when when they radicalize when they do things to the farthest reaching extreme

But heaven forbid heaven forbid you use some common sense and you make it about the individual patient

That is where they draw the line actually that's not going to be where they draw the line

They're going to keep moving this and you know

This is why we have to double down on our efforts and this is why we all have to be rage-baited by Dave

By half-tag brave Dave so that we stand up and do something because the

The Republicans are not standing up for rfk. They're not standing up for these changes

They're not doing anything to help the situation and that's why they're going to get their back sides handed to them

There's there's sabotaging yeah

Because they're not doing the things that people want if your party and I say your party not because I don't align with conservative values

But because these people who have taken over because your party is not following through

On what they said that they would do so we're like might as well have a Democrat at least

They're going to be honest with us and just to circle back really quickly on what Ashley said

You know, this is a ruling. This is basically just trampling over the majority the the public opinion

You know the people that are voicing their concerns and with the AAP not being a governing body

Ashley hit the nail on the head that people genuinely need to understand words matter. They give

Recommendations these are not mandatory

They are recommendations and guidelines that people assume that they have to follow that they are mandated to do

And this is what carries out in doctors offices pediatricians etc

So again, we have to be very aware of the wording and the verbiage that these individuals that now are being told the judge and the AAP have this final decision

Is a problem because this is not mandated. This is obviously something that they're giving guidelines for and you know

Recommending so people really need to understand that this is not

Governing body making all these decisions. No, another wrinkle to this. That's really important to understand is that the CDC director

Right now is an interim director. It's jabada chariom. He's also the NIH director

We actually don't have a CDC

Director right now. Why? Because they have to be approved by the Senate

So again, here we are back to

The midterm elections that are coming up here. Are we even going to have a Trump appointee in charge of the CDC by the time these midterms happen?

Are they going to get approved by the Senate? Maybe not. It's entirely possible that that's not going to happen

It hasn't happened up till this point and now all of a sudden we've got other things going on in the world that are

That are attracting a lot of attention and Jay bodacharya's tenure is is limited

It's something like 120 days from the day of his appointment

He's got to be out of there and that is coming up really really soon here

So we're going to it's just like the way they dragged their feet on the statute of limitations for so many things over the past

10 years like investigations into all of hunter

Biden's crime. So we're investigating that. We're investigating that. Oh, the statute of limitations is up

This has been the playbook the bondee justice department has been I mean she let all the statues of limitations go on so much

Of what happened on January 6th and I refuse to believe that that wasn't intentional at this point because it's just like the other

Plays in the playbook that they do they do the same thing over and over and we're waking up to it

We are seeing it now, but look at this judge

He wants the protocols to be followed the CDC. They've got to be following their protocols

They have to obey the rules. So let's talk about CDC rules and let's go back to

1986 because when the 1986 national childhood vaccine injury act was passed

It required annual reports from the director of the national vaccine program at the CDC to congressional committees

In terms of following rules they haven't followed this rule for half a century

At this point where are all the lawsuits about that? Where was the AAP on that one? We we don't see any lawsuits about them

Reporting to Congress about what's going on with the vaccination programs in the United States

If you're wondering about what's going on with vaccinations programs since they passed that law

Well, we know that the number of vaccines just absolutely skyrocketed

But what about diseases have childhood diseases gone down? Well, here's the ones that have gone up just a small sampling

Autism neurodefellamental disorders 80 HD anxiety disorders depression

Obesity asthma food allergies eczema atopic dermatitis type 1 diabetes celiac disease inflammatory bowel disease

Childhood cancers like leukemia and brain tumors eating disorders speech and language disorders developmental delays behavioral problems autoimmune disorders juvenile

idiopathic arthritis chronic fatigue syndrome tick disorders the list goes on and on and I'm not even talking about

They went up by a little they went up by a lot despite the fact that vaccines are so safe and effective

But have we eradicated measles months rebela diphtheria?

No, of course not those were essentially eradicated by better nutrition and sanitation processes back before these vaccines came out in the 1960s

Another wrinkle to that is everybody

At the turn of the century the 19th century was giving their children medicines based off of mercury

And we stopped doing that and lo and behold the childhood mortality got way better

So it's just infuriating that you know, they pretend that they're all about the rules and let's follow procedures and protocols

But something like hey, we should we should obey the law and report to Congress about what's going on with vaccines in this country

They just spent half a century ignoring that law completely and now we don't have anybody to enforce it because we don't have those

Positions filled at the CDC

Because our Senate including Senate

Senate Republicans who are completely bought and paid for by pharma won't approve

People to head these organizations that they know are going to threaten their pharma

Goal handlers looking at you Senator Bill Cassidy. I know you guys know a lot about the

1986 act thoughts here. It's absolutely infuriating. I mean, how can you go?

I was too. Okay. How can you go that long?

And not take a look at anything. How can you have so much

Information presented to you. I could go into the Lazarus study the

2001 study that said less than 1% of adverse events

Were reported the fact that we have a system that works with epic that could be implemented across the country

The fact that we could have this data. We could have this information at our fingertips

And I got an argument with somebody over the weekend about this because I'm like

Okay, you and I are never going to agree on vaccines never

It's not going to happen. How about we agree on something that would be

Why aren't we finding ways to help decrease the risk of these adverse events improve the safety and quality of the vaccines

We have much better technology and support the people who are incurring the risk

I said why can't we just agree on that? Yeah, but they're not interested in doing any of that

They're too worried about their money. It's such easy common ground like how can you disagree about that?

It's mind-boggling one of the other hosts on the nurses report Gail McCray

She and I have spoken multiple times about our

vaccination data overall in this country

She worked out at Kaiser Permanente before being fired for being unvaccinated and as we've kind of made the rounds in the

COVID-disident community we have networked with so many people who have looked at their organizations data and

I saw one for example

That was about 14 million patients and only it was about 23% of the patients in this giant database had any record of any vaccine at any time

We know that 90 some percent of people in this country have gotten an MMR vaccine according to their data

It's like 20 some percent that's how broken our data chains are but what they do and again

This is all completely intentional if they don't have record of vaccination and you get a disease like COVID

They count you as unvaccinated. They don't count you as vaccination status unknown

Other countries did that other countries said vaccination status unknown

But our CDC at the height of COVID

Again, that's why I say like none of this was an accident when you add all this up

It's just one thing after another it is clearly intentional

They decided to count the unknown as unvaccinated knowing full well

That the vast majority of Americans these data chains break down with their vaccination status

And it was part of the game. It's part of how they pushed the safe and effective narrative

Hey, if you don't have any safety data at all

Then there's no evidence of harm and it wasn't new during COVID

It was something that they had been doing for decades literally with all the childhood vaccines

Nicole

And it is it's just something again to note that a lot of people will argue and say well

We're always referring to vaccines, right?

But there's so many other things Nicole, right?

There's the poison in our air what they're spraying on us the soil the water the food and we're not negating that

But what we are saying is that you know when you look at the data they say as Dave just said

I think it's like 90 to 95 percent don't quote me exactly of the United States children are vaccinated against MMR

But you know rates are continuing to decline because as Dave mentioned all the things that are coming out with children

Being the sickest in a first world country and having all these health issues and what is a common factor

What is a common denominator that most are being pushed to receive after pediatricians office who by the way have the authority to

Refuse treatment and be unethical and say that they're not going to give them the time of day

If they decide not to be vaccinated or follow a delayed schedule

So co-horsing if you will and making parents feel as if this is the only way

To protect their child which we know is a lack of informed consent that's not true

And and so we see all this happening in very young infants and children and then again

Even that reporting is very poor

Because how many times have parents said that their child just had a change or have been brought to their pediatrician after a vaccine

And they're told this is normal or you know what just give it some time

This isn't this isn't related. This is completely unrelated

So there's so much more to dive into that. I know we're getting close to the end of the show

But you know people need to understand that this is

Intentional it is by design and the information could be a lot more robust when it comes to data

But they choose to make it so it's not the data gaps are a feature not a bug not having good data

Is a feature not a bug from these absolute

Pharmacoles and you are right Nicole that huge list. I gave of all the childhood illnesses that have skyrocketed since the 1986

Vaccine act there are a lot of things on the table about what might be causing that there's all the end occurs

Disruptors there are all the process foods

There are all the pesticides that are in our foods that are allowed in the US when they're not allowed in anywhere else in the world and

To bring it back to politics as well so many Republican states right now are passing laws to give immunity

To the pesticide manufacturers. What are we what are we doing? Do we Indiana or Florida? Are they facing laws like that right now?

We lost ours and that did not pass so we are we're in the same boat

We'll stay vigilant because they are going to try again. They are so much more

Organized than us who are more libertarian minded who just want to live our lives and be left alone

But we can't we have to stay vigilant because they are coming for us. They're coming for our jobs

They're coming for our kids. They don't care how high the pile of bodies gets as long as they have control

As long as they have the piles of cash whatever their motivations are

We're going to keep making these connections the connections between diagnosis codes vaccine injuries

The pandemic response all the key players in a part two of this episode

So stay tuned for that until next time this has been nurses David and Nicole and Ashley for the

Oh