
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Luke Beasley Show publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
About this episode
“You weren't ever on Jeffrey Epstein's jet, were you? I was on Jeffrey Epstein's jet two times. I was on it in 1993 and I went to Florida with my wife and two children to visit my mom over Easter. My wife had some kind of relationship with Glenn Maxwell.”From the transcript
Today on the show, Luke discusses disturbing reporting on Epstein’s reaction to Mary Kennedy’s death, Massie’s Hegseth impeachment push, and more!
Order your PEP now!
https://drinkpep.com/
Get connected below!
Twitter - https://twitter.com/lukepbeasley
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/lukebeasleyofficial/
TikTok -https://vm.tiktok.com/TTPdSfpPHw/
YouTube channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM05jgFNwoeXvWfO9GuExzAl
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Luke Beasley Show publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
1,081 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
The Luke Beasley Show — Disturbing Epstein Email. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
You weren't ever on Jeffrey Epstein's jet, were you? I was on Jeffrey Epstein's jet two times. I was on it in 1993 and I went to Florida with my wife and two children to visit my mom over Easter. My wife had some kind of relationship with Glenn Maxwell. I'm going to stop it there. You heard that reference. I think he's talking about the same wife that's at issue here and this story sent chills down my spine. We've already heard there's just this very bizarre phenomenon in this administration where the likelihood that you'll have to give some mumbo-jumbo-confusing response when
asked about your relationship with Epstein is higher than not. I feel like in most administration you can be like, hey, were you friends with Epstein? No, you, no, you, no, you, no, and maybe find like one person. But in this administration, it's like every single person has to come up with a different story about their particular and all. Well, I guess I was at that one thing. It's all very bizarre, but then this story comes out and I'm being serious. It sent chills down my spine made me so uncomfortable. So today the Beast reports, bombshell Epstein link to RFK Jr's tragic wife revealed and we're talking about Mary Kennedy and there's this email exchange. I'll get to that, but I think first you should know the background. Mary Richardson Kennedy's death at her bedfurt home was ruled a suicide and an autopsy revealed she had anti-depressants in her blood. This is again the ex-wife of RFK Jr. Two years prior she had filed for divorce from now Health and Human Services Secretary
RFK Jr. While the divorce was still pending, Richardson Kennedy found her husband's personal journal detailing his affairs or muggings as he called them with 37 women. Shortly after that she hanged herself. So just a really tragic and heartbreaking story and what it once again reveals about our current HHS secretary is just a background that has 10 people's lives worth of controversies and scandals and heartbreak and terrible decisions. For example, having affairs with 37 women as I've talked about before, how do you even schedule that? Thirty, he had to have a whole part of his contact list just labeled with a certain letter so they would all sort next to each other of all of his quote unquote, mistresses. And then for some reason in his personal journal, he would admit to all this and then for some reason he would describe having sex with women who weren't his wife muggings.
Like in his language, he almost put, and this isn't even the bombshell part. We already know this. In exchange, the Epstein had over the topic of his ex-wife suicide that is the chilling part. But still, is this what we have to have for our leaders? People who have this type of history and then their actions in part cause such significant distress that their wife commit suicide. Again, I'm sure there was a bigger story there too and more that caused that decision. But it definitely played a role to discover your husband's journal here divorcing from where he's talking about all the time. See, cheated on you, but then just the bizarreness of our kitchen as a person muggings. Remember that one excerpt that we read that was like I was walking home from, um, from CVS and I accidentally engaged in a mugging. And again, he's talking about sex. Like he, he put the agents almost on the women like they forced him to do this when it was just him sleeping around.
But then the new information, Epstein's cavalier response to this tragedy was until now unknown and was certainly unavailable to law enforcement at the time. Why would law enforcement be relevant? Well, when you read this, your mind wanders. Wonders. So you have Eva Dubin, an ex-girlfriend of Epstein, writing Mary Kennedy found dead in her backyard and Epstein responds only with no punctuation. Whoops. I don't know about you, but that freaks the crap out of me. So somebody emails Epstein saying Mary Kennedy found dead in her backyard and Epstein responds whoops. Whoops. There are two scenarios. I guess the more likely one is he obviously is associate path. So he doesn't care. And he's like, whoops. Whoa. Like another tragedy in the Kennedy family.
Like a cavalier. Whoa. But unrelated to his actions, where your mind goes though, is that sounds like a killer who would say something like that. And I have zero evidence of him being involved at all. I'm not claiming that. But that's why this is so jarring. Because that seems exactly like someone notifying their boss that the kill happened and then them saying whoops. Not alleging that at all. I'm just saying that's what is so disturbing about it. And then if not that, which is not from all we know evidentially, then he's just that detached from human life as we could have expected. But I will say the whole RFK junior talking about this topic has never given me a comforting vibe. You remember whenever you got asked about Epstein, he was like, whoa, whoa, I wasn't just friends with Epstein. Oh my gosh. I was friends with O.J. Simpson and Bill Cosby and et cetera.
Oh, and I run into everybody in New York. I mean, I knew Harvey Weinstein. I knew Roger A. Oslo. I knew O.J. Simpson came to my house. I got him. Bill Cosby came to my house. I don't think he knows that that is not as effective as he believed it to be in this daily beast article. They also linked this interview where RFK junior is leaning back in his chair as casually as he possibly can while being asked about this topic. Again, I'm not alleging anything beyond what we know. I do understand it's plausible that when you're in a powerful family, then you're rubbing elbows with lots of other powerful people and some of those people end up doing really bad things. And I miss when we had leaders that would not have to give such complicated, nuanced, specific explanations to the question, hey, do you buddies with this guy? Ask you about something that is in the news today. Many names of associates of Jeffrey Epstein being made public about to be made public
back in November. You told Newsweek you'd been on Epstein's plane once in the early 90s. You told Nifox News in December, you're on his plane twice. Is there anything more that voters need to know about your connection with Jeffrey Epstein before any more information comes out? No, I mean, I think I like what's happening today. I like the fact that all these papers are being released. I've been an advocate for transparency. I think the government keeps too many secrets. I think it's important for the American public to know whether Jeffrey Epstein had some kind of corrupt influence on public officials or any public figure. And those are the kind of... Yeah. Oh gosh. I don't know what's happening. I heard that RFK Jr. is planning a presidential run. I don't know if they know. I think they don't know how... My total sheets were record. They're still high on the 2024 supply of winning.
They're still remembering the firecrackers and the walking out on stage or the pyroise to say. And RFK Jr. You're doing the unity ticket with Maga and Maga and Mahan. We're going to Maga Mahan up. It's going to be great. And they still are kind of writing that high and in their bubble. They're staff are saying you're doing great. And don't seem to know how politically toxic they are. Pete Heggseth too is gearing up to run for breath. No more dudes in dresses. Even the people who would vote for Trump again would be less likely to vote for you. There's nothing I've explained this before but at least RFK Jr. could try to run on something separate from the huge Trump administration blunders. I just think we're cooking out the toilet seats. He could ignore his own HHS blunders. At least events could be like, well, I'm not necessarily running on the Iran war by itself. Heggseth's whole thing is the Iran war. So that's all he is only political like identity is political baggage.
That's it. It's I don't understand the presidential campaign industrial complex. The people who just constantly think it's their turn next and don't have any finger on the pulse of where the American people are. And that is that's the story. I am just so uncomfortable by that obscene email again. One more time in response to Mary Richardson Kennedy taking her own life. Whoops. So disturbing. Thank you to Brenda Merrill for the super chat. And then hammers says if Trump made made had a drink of pep, maybe he would be a better man plus six seven. That's a crazy journey of a super chat. Everyone make sure to just word check before you send out before you hit send on those suckers. But I appreciate it. And I am heartbroken to have to notify all of you that after yesterday's plug, a lot
of you said great. I would love to go order some more pep. Thank you for the reminder. And we found out that this incredible audience has been slurping up pep like I've asked them to and we are out of stock for the time being. So I'll give you an update whenever yay because that was part of our goal. I'll just explain to you the way that the production runs work is you know, you have this big hall and then you sell it and then you make another batch and you sell it. And since we're gearing up to launch a third flavor, I guess there were some we didn't exactly predict perfectly the launch compared to when we would run out. And so people went to the website and it was sold out, which is cool, but a bummer because I want you to pop it order when you want to order. But we'll get that resolved as quickly as possible. Let's talk about this now. Impeaching Peter Brian Hegseth, Secretary of Defense for High Crimes and Misdemeanors.
All that Peter Brian Hegseth, Secretary of Defense, also referred to as Secretary of War by the administration is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate, articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and of the people of the United States of America against Peter, Brian Hegseth, Secretary of Defense. I know you're supposed to say it in an official manner, but a little part of me thinks that Thomas Massey is very correctly somehow degrading Pete Hegseth by continually referring to him as his full name because Pete Hegseth rings differently to the ear than Peter Brian Hegseth. There's just something that takes you down to like a child. Peter Brian, Peter Brian, get in the school bus. That is him announcing his introduction of articles of impeachment. Luke, what would he try to impeach Hegseth for?
You choose a bunch of things. The numerous obvious illegal acts that have been committed by this newly described department of war, whether it be extrajudicial killings of people and boats without congressional approval or going to war without congressional approval or war crimes committed while we're at war, there are plenty of reasons that one could make a case for impeachment for Pete Hegseth. Will this work? No, it will not. I'm going to get ahead of that. But it's good to see Massey trying to put some pressure because when you do this, even if it doesn't work, you launch a whole discussion and you shine a light on what is being done. The only confusing part is if you were to impeach Hegseth for any of those things, who really signed off on them, Trump, so he should be impeached as well. But Mike Johnson saw this news and the way that it was structured procedurally, and I might not be able to explain this perfectly, but in rough terms, puts a clock for forcing a vote
on impeachment and getting that ball rolling. And so because of the clock that has been started by Massey's move here to discuss and decide on this topic, Mike Johnson just ended Congress until after the midterms. Now they were already going to go on recess until after the midterms on Thursday, but he pulled it back even earlier. So today they're just going to wrap up, go home, which I thought they just got back to work. I'm very confused. Let's speak about that. Johnson on Wednesday announced he's sending members home on Washington from Washington early for their seven week campaigning recess, a move that will stave off a vote on impeaching defense secretary, Pete Hegseth. So again, if you were worried about the productivity of Congress, just know at least they were able to vote on a denunciation of socialism. They did get that done.
Now the second push for the remaining Epstein files bill, that will not be heard because of the recess, the Pete Hegseth impeachment, that will not be heard because of the recess. Mike Johnson would say, that's not why I did that. I'm doing this because my members of Congress need to go campaign, but that's obviously playing a role because he knew they would have to campaign for a very long time, bringing it back specifically one day earlier is a very purposeful choice. And Massey was trying to hold his cards close to his chest so that a reaction like this couldn't happen. It seemed to happen. Anyways, here's some explaining why he didn't give any heads up to Republican leadership that he was going to introduce this impeachment. Bishop, didn't know about this. Why didn't you tell them you were planning to introduce this? Every time they see the hand that I'm going to play, they get a chance to react. So last week that we were in session, I introduced the discharge petition for the Epstein
files, the part two. What did they do? They called off two weeks of Congress between now and the election to keep me from getting to 218 signatures. This is the second Epstein recess. We had an Epstein recess a year ago where they called off Congress for like six weeks. So I didn't want to show my hand. I didn't show it to anybody. I was afraid that they would do something to subvert me getting on the floor for an hour and 20 minutes and reading these articles. And so you read all of this in terms of what happened here. Have you heard from Speaker Johnson since this afternoon? I have not heard from Speaker Johnson, but he has two legislative days, actually 48 hours to call this vote. So he could call the vote tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. And that was another reason for the timing. If I were to offer this tomorrow instead of today, they could have punted this until the after the election. This is a hot war. This could become a nuclear war. And in the interim, even if it doesn't, there are civilian casualties that are racking
up greater than they would have otherwise because another one of my articles of impeachment shows that Peter Hegseth has degraded the ability of the DOD to minimize civilian casualties. He asked Congress to repeal a law that requires him to minimize civilian casualties. Congress didn't do it. We went ahead and did it on his own within the DOD. And the results were predictable. That's why 200 school kids were killed in the first attack on Iran. So again, there's plenty of reasons in a normal time that Hegseth would be thrown out of his position and peaked and convicted and gone. In that world though, where our Congress would react in such a way, they would never have placed him in this position. And that explains where we are today, which is the same exact people who knew how unqualified he was, who knew the allegations against him, who knew that this was not going to work out well. We're just too afraid of Trump. And I was just listening to a podcast where I think it was Maggie Heyverman again was
explaining the process of, yeah, Maggie Heyverman, John, this one, the process of getting all of these Trump oilists into their positions despite a bunch of Republican senators not wanting to confirm them after Trump's nomination because they worried about how bad it would be to have unqualified leaders. But once again, as we've seen throughout the Trump era, you either went along or he ended your career and a lot of them just chose to protect their career and then select these people and now we're seeing the results of it. I think a lot of them probably when they were choosing Hegseth thought, well, you know, maybe he'll run around and shout about DEI for a few years and we'll be in peace time and it'll be fine. But the problem is real things happen, okay? And these positions mean something. It's not just all a reality show and we actually went to war and now we're actually seeing what horrible leadership in a war and horrible leadership and choosing if we should go to a war. Looks like.
And then the question I ask so often is why to these Republican senators does it matter for you to have a career if your career sucks this bad and I'm sorry that's not a more thoughtful way to say it, but that's the way that I say you know what I mean? What is the senatorial career if you don't get to do things that are good, then what is the satisfaction to you for being in that position? But I like to be straightforward with you. He's not going to get removed from his position unless Trump chooses because there's just too many Republicans who will bend the knee to Trump and not go along with this. But good for Thomas Massey again, he is a Republican and he's a rare Republican that while he is very against left wing politics to be clear, me and him would not agree on very many things. He still recognizes that right now the big issue we have is this administration and pretending like the big issue we should all be focusing on is some nebulous communistic threat from
the far left is just silly. Then Thomas Massey, the right wing Republican, is seeing clearly on that. One other just funny clip talking about staffers for members of Congress often write out everything their member of Congress is going to say hands it to them and then like a robot, the house member or the senator just regurgitates it. And now because of AI increasingly, AI is doing that. And Thomas Massey is warning these staffers that your job will get replaced of putting words in your boss's mouth and then it'll just be from one robot to a human robot. If you just always came down here and read your speeches, some of them are written by AI now. The staff better watch out. It was a good gig while you had it writing the speech for your robot boss to come down here. Our here is my speech. Well, now they got a robot to replace you to feed your robot a speech.
This is not a robot speech folks. I am not a robot congressman never have been. I am a contrary to what Speaker said a fully participating member of Congress. That is funny to think about increasingly these politicians who are in many ways robots and they just regurgitate what people tell them to say. And what the lobbyists say and what the donors say and then what their staffers say and then they just go out and like Mitch McConnell, people tell him how to vote and he just votes with AI, we could literally be in a place where the robots, the human politician robots are regurgitate the words of actual robots. Grim Grim picture Massey. Near a doodle said, did you see the UK PM that almost got caught in a Russian attack on the border of Poland? I somehow did not see that and that is absolutely crazy. A supporter of Donald Trump's and a trucker who says he still supports Trump, but needed to make this video a message to the president begging him to lower diesel prices because
his business is getting killed by the diesel prices because of the spike caused by the Iran war. We now have all time high diesel prices and so trucks like this run on diesel and that causes every most consequential economic ripple effect or one of the most you can think of because everything that gets transported which is so much by truckers like him and by the truck like you're seeing behind him. Run on this diesel prices go up so that everything will have to go up and here is him begging Trump to do something. This message is for President Trump. President Trump I've supported you since you came down the escalade. I still support you. I know you're doing what's best for all of us. I know what you're doing and I ran. They can't have a nuke. But I'm begging you right now. You gotta end it. You gotta do something. Diesel fuel just broke six dollars a gallon.
This truck behind me, $275,000 for this truck and I can't afford to let it leave the garage now because what used to cost me 300 and change now cost me 600 and change. My fuel is doubled. I can't keep hitting the customers. The truck makes a grand a day. So you burn and you're why are you hitting the customers? Burn in 300 dollars a day and fuel a half a tank. Depending on where you're going. That's a short haul. You're paying your driver 30, 35 an hour. You got taxes. You got registration. You got if the fees. You've got you just got overweight per rep. You got all this stuff. That truck makes me no money. Ty is of God through the roof because of the fuel. So please, please. I don't have faith in the midterms. I think this I ran thing. Which it was good to go in there. Sometimes I think maybe it was better to have them have a nuke because they were just
going to hit New York anyway. We don't need New York. All right. Then we could have wiped them out at that point. But I'm telling you, I'm imploring. Okay. So I don't know if he thought he was kidding there, but sir, you're losing me. I'm trying. I'm trying. I'm signal boosting your message to the president. Maybe we'll get it through him together. And I'm trying to agree with you. There's probably so hard running the business that you do right now. You just said maybe it would have been good for a run to get a nuclear weapon because they would have hit New York City first, meaning murder to all of the, what is it? Nine million New Yorkers. And then that would have given us justification to murder all 80 90 million Iranians. Is that the geopolitics take that you have? We could have avoided all this by just letting them get a nuke and letting them kill all New Yorkers because you don't like that city. Okay. Maybe you were joking. Not weird. Here's just so you can see US diesel prices pretty dang shocking. And like he just went through, imagine your fuel costs double.
It's not like his profit margin before was going to be the best ever. Already probably was a tough business. Imagine then your fuel costs doubling. Then how do you make a profit as a small business in his case? Sir, I'm moving forward. I'm moving forward despite being very earth that you just make that reference. And maybe sir, you know how like a decade ago, two decades ago, Netanyahu was telling us that Iran was going to have a nuke weapon in a couple of weeks. And then Obama and then Biden and then Trump in his first term were like, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. And then our intelligence services came to Trump and said, no, no, no, this is not an imminent threat. And it's not what you're being told. And then we went to war anyway. Imagine how mad you would be, sir, if the diesel prices weren't just high for a necessary
reason, but we're high for an unnecessary reason. That's where we need to get you, sir. Donald Trump posted gas prices are at crazy levels in 2012. Fire Obama. It's September. My company's just me and my two kids. We try to do it the right way. We pay our fees. We pay our taxes. We try to keep the equipment updated so we can buy new equipment. So everything works for everybody. But you got to do something about this fuel because that truck is not going to leave this garage. It can't leave this garage until the fuel comes down. The customers, we can't keep jacking it up because you know what my custom is the same? Hold off on the project and wait until fuel comes down. We have a big project in the middle of the mass. We've been bidding and it's been held for two years. You know why? Because the cost of everything is too expensive to do the project. So please, sir, you still got my support. But man, you got to do something. You got to end this and I ran. Get it done. Finish it. And you keep preaching about where energy independence.
Why are we still traded in the WTI? Why don't we just keep our own fuel here? For the Americans. Thank you. I feel like being a Trump supporter now is like whenever squirrels run in front of the car and you're like, I don't know why you do that. You saw your friend get run over. You saw your other friend get run over. You saw Mrs. Squirrel get hit. You saw Uncle Squirrel that raging drunk get whatever. Get hit. Okay. You saw this over and then you still try to run right when the car goes. And then one of the cars runs over your tail and you keep saying that you support the car. I don't know that I got lost in the metaphor a little bit there. But it really is uncomfortable. I feel uncomfortable watching him have to repeat. I still support you. I think somewhere in his heart he still believes this is all going to work out in the end.
And I think two truths if he internalized it would change his whole perception of the world politics. The first being what I said, what if you switch your premise from, I know we had to do this, but it sucks to we didn't have to do this and it's terrible in relation to a run. The second and this is going to really hurt sir if you're saying this, but Trump does not know what he's doing. You remember whenever he said these countries don't know what they're doing that applies to him. He doesn't know. He doesn't care about you. He doesn't have a plan. I don't even know. He is clueless. He got into this with no plan. He stuck in it with no plan. That's it. The only way you can take back your dignity after being tricked is to get rid of him completely
from your loyalty. You have to give up all loyalty to him and be an independent thinker. Only way you can take back your dignity. Otherwise less nice than me people will see this video and think you deserve it. I don't. I know you believe Trump was going to do good things for prices. I know you believe that. I have sympathy for you. These people see you keep saying you support him and go well then get what you support. But I don't say that. But you do have to just turn off officially the loyalty Trump switch to reclaim your dignity and your independence. But I am really sorry. I'm sure it is very, very tough the situation that she in. Thank you to DevilsWishlist for becoming DevilsWishlist. I guess is what it is with a missing letter.
Thank you so much for becoming a member. The original EU urban says 9-11 means nothing to him. New York that's nuts. I know. Exactly. Pretty surprising. I guess. You're going to lose any good will. The people who would signal boost that are primarily people who are anti-Trump now. A lot of liberals are ready to open their heart to you and say come on. We can do something better and we can make it easier for you to run your small business. Yay. Let's link arms. But when you turn around and go also it would be funny to see y'all get nuked. You're really losing the support that you could otherwise have. You could make that video and make it go funny. I bet a bunch of liberals will donate to you until you're calling for nuking them. And also he's like and then that would have given us justification to eliminate all of Iran. Dude. And he's like, wait if Trump doesn't know what he's doing, how did he get elected?
So you get it? Because you stuff like that. And there's a lot of people who think stuff like that like you. That's why. But I say that with love. I say it with love. Here we go. Do you want to be a mom? Yes or no? Yeah. Okay, you want to be a mom. Okay, you're 29, right? When do you want to be a mom? Wait, pause. Let me make sure we have Z Cohen Sanchez. Yes, here we go. I want to make sure I got the proper attribution. Now let's start the segment. Do you want to be a mom? Yes or no? Yeah. Okay, you want to be a mom. Okay, you're 29, right? When do you want to be a mom? What are you? You said they're doing. I would want to know why at 29 years old Pearls. If they keep doing personal attacks, they got to go. I don't want to take them there. If you don't kick them for personal. She's got to go. Because you're already noticing the debate. She's doing personal attacks. I think in general, could we try to make this debate work or you don't want it to be? No, she broke the rules. Do we tell them the rules ahead of time they don't listen and you guys never kick them? We'll have them melt down because she doesn't want to answer the question. Why?
Don't you have kids telling you she's got to go. I left my kids on a Saturday to come to this debate. Sean told me you wanted to debate. Which debate? Obviously she doesn't want to debate when it becomes personal attacks. So you probably watched that and if you don't know the two characters you think, wow, that person saying why don't you have kids is so rude. That's probably the mega person that looks describing in this YouTube title, which is why I clicked on it about them storming out. But then the other person stormed out who was being belittled about not hanging out. What kind of liberal would belittle someone for choosing to not have kids? Oh wait. But let me introduce you to the characters. As Pearl Davis, I think her use names like it's pearly things is notoriously insanely red-pilled on men and women's issues. And Micah summed up the whole debate this way. Pearl saying women should shut up and make babies. Pearl being the person who stormed out there.
Z saying okay, why don't you do that and Pearl storming out. This is the funniest phenomenon potentially and most hypocritical in American cultural debate, which is you will have people who espouse this like we need to go back to traditional living where men have all of the power and women, you know, they're always the issue these days and they're just nagging. They're so naggy. Why did this war happen? Because someone's wife was nagging them. That's the type of language that Pearl uses. And it's like they just need to go back to being in the kitchen and being a traditional housewife and shutting up and letting their husband make the decisions. And then she says this while being a leader in her espouse a little for own political views, great contradicts her views though. And while not living the life that she shouts down every other woman for not living, okay?
So let's go through this. It's just so we've seen it so many times. We really have big podcasters telling their audiences that women need to go back to being purely home makers and need to stop being in any careers. And then you're like, wait, you're doing a huge career saying that, which again, we love and support you are saying that she don't. And if you think that I'm over emphasizing Pearl's anti woman's dances, her argument in this little like Jubilee rip off debate thing they're doing was women are terrible mothers. Look, which women women? That was Pearl Davis's claim that she's defending in this debate. In our terrible mothers, she has a general statement, okay? And then Z who's sitting across from her asks a personal question to see if Pearl lives
by the standards the she has spouses. We're talking about women. You said all women are terrible mothers, right? I can't acknowledge that there I said women are terrible mothers. Now generally when I make a generalization, which I do, I would say the majority. Okay. The majority of women are terrible. You could split hairs at what percent, right? But I would say in general, generally what percent do you think it's 90 percent? I think it's 10 percent. What are we actually talking about? If I give you that, are we going to split hairs in maybe? No, no, that's not. I don't mind telling you, but I don't want to spend half the debate going back and is it 50 percent, 70 percent, 89? I just want to know where your head is at with. At least the majority over half. Okay, so you think over half of the mothers are terrible mothers. Okay. Selfish choices, they divorce the father, they nag, they belittle, they nitpick, even when I do debates with men and women, women in general tend to be much more insufferable. And I would say that's common inside the home and outside.
I think it's more so because you lose against women. That's not really, they're much easier to debate actually than that. I will not according to the Anna Kasperian debate, but we'll save that for another time. Right. So I'm just wondering, what did you just reference there? I'm going to show you and then we'll get back to what built up to Pearl storming out of this debate. But she once did a similar debate with Anna Kasperian and it started going so poorly for her. Again, this is the cottage industry of female red pill right wing influencers who tell an audience of men that all the men are correct that the source of all their problems are the women in their lives. And that relationship is all because of women as opposed to it's because of both any issues we have relationally as a society have some components of both parties, okay, as a general rule. There's no explanation that's like it's this identity group that is the source of every single role in any analysis. But that's what she tries to do.
And there's multiple influencers like this to be a woman who is telling men that they're correct in any of their anti women urges can be a profitable endeavor. It's just a little crazy and really easy to debunk even just on a personal level because you can ask them about their own life and they're never abiding by the very traditional principles or however you explain it that they espouse. But here is the reference to Anna Kasperian. Are you just making things up? No. Pearl, what are you doing? Like seriously. A next question. How many women die every year during childbirth? Not many. This country has the highest maternal mortality rate of any developed country so a lot of women
do die as a result of pregnancy and childbirth. Yes. It's very awkward, okay, I can't watch any more of this. She just goes silent and she won't respond to anything. So that is of course very bizarre but that's what was referenced by C there and we'll pick up what we left off. In this room because you said over 50%. So knowing that over 50% in this room we'd probably have at least 30% that you think are terrible mothers. How many of you guys are mothers? Okay, so almost all everybody's mom. I'm a mom. Okay. How many of you guys hate your kids? Raise your hand. Oh, okay. So already that statistic doesn't hold him. Right. That's one of her claims to is that women hate their kids. What are we doing here? It's a somehow. So we'll just get forward in the debate but they go around around on that for a while polling the women in the room and obviously the point that's being made by Z is you're
disparaging the people sitting around you and it's not even accurate and by personalizing it she can make that point. Now do I agree as it pertains to this next portion when Pearl storms out that ideally you keep a debate about the data and the substance and all that. Yes, I do agree. So if I were arguing some right wing guy over equality and I knew that his relationship with his wife was not as regimented and traditional as he thinks other people's relationships should be. I'd probably just want to keep it a discussion about the ideas around what best relationships are and what society should promote. But I would have to fight the urge not to go, hey dude, I know about your life and you don't even live the way that you are telling other people to live. But while typically in a debate not making it personal and not just making it a hypocrisy call out, but also getting to the core of the substance is the best way to approach it.
How do you do that with this debate topic? How do you do that when the person across me is like, so women also do that. It's sucking, I suck and everyone's terrible and it's just like, the world would be a better place of women just weren't in it. Like how do you debate with that claim other than being like, okay, let's test your standards? How are you doing on the make a baby being the kitchen, standard? I'm asking you a question. Can you stop talking so I can ask the moderator a question? She's not a marathon. Okay, but I'm asking you a question. What is a personal tap that I've asked you? I've talked about it about it. It's a 29 year old wife. It's a 20 year old. It's a 20 year old. It's not the prompt. I'm just trying to keep us on the prompt. The prompt is that all women hate mother. That all women hate their children. That's what I'm asking you. That's what I'm asking you. She's not going to come over. She's not going to come over. She's not going to come over. She's not going to come over. I'm not going anywhere until you answer the question. You got a question. I just answer the question. Look at you. The art is not my job. Yes, it is. I want like, could we try to make this to be work or you don't want it to be work? No, she's got to get, she broke the rules. Do we tell them the rules ahead of time they don't listen and you guys never came.
You're having a meltdown because she doesn't want to answer the question. Why don't you have kids? I don't hate my kids. That is so personal. It's not relevant to the topic. Like who knows? Who knows? There's people that can't be used. That is a great thing. I don't think that she thinks that women that don't have babies are not value bull in society. Is that true? She's going to kick her or not. You need to kick her. I'm telling you. She's not going to debate you. I'm trying to keep this about the topic. I'll talk to you later. Tell me, she's got to go. Is there anything to get rid of her? What did I say that was a personal attack? I'm asking you why not, it's a 29 and that's a personal attack. She's not going to debate over that. No, no, no, no. No, I'm telling you, she's not gonna debate you. What do you want to talk about? Let's talk about what you want to talk about. You got it guys. Come on. You requested this debate? You asked me to come. out of my I left my kids on a Saturday to come to this debate. John told me you wanted to debate.
Wait, wait, wait. We didn't have to bring up her phone. Like this, I just, okay, listen guys, we got to stick to the prompts because you know, you're giving care and as well. Personal attacks and obviously she doesn't want to debate when it becomes personal attacks and I have no control over her. So she's deciding to walk out of the room and I just she doesn't want to answer the question. The prompts is very simple. We got to stick to the prompts. We have stuff to the prompts. Ask me that question. If you like, so that's how it ended. I don't even know. That's the only portion I saw. I don't even want to wait into the rest of it. I don't know what else was being discussed in that debate. But pearls just a funny silly Billy just a silly Billy and it feels very sad. She kind of gives me sad energy like Lindsey Graham. I don't want to bring Lindsey Graham into it because he's about to wait. But like Ted Cruz, Ted Cruz energy of I sold my soul. I'm just saying what I think I have to say for a quick paycheck or in Ted Cruz case for a political career. And I know I don't mean it and it degrades me every time. But I'm
not even kidding. If you're not familiar with her, we barely talk about her. So that's why I feel like I need to fill in some of the gaps. These podcasts she'll do are so overboard in terms of self hatred. It's just her sitting in front of dudes and saying, oh yeah, you feel like you've never done anything wrong in a relationship and the only reason they all failed was because of the woman. Five different women. Yeah, you're right. It was because of them. They're terrible. Yep, they're terrible. And how people can't just get their head around. Men can be terrible and women can be terrible. Men can be great and women can be great. It's pretty simple actually. And then to the children thing, what's so difficult about the principal love if you want to have children? Yay, awesome. It can be the most beautiful thing in the world to start a family to build a family. I think that is so amazing. And then if you don't or you want to delay it or whatever, then awesome as well. And that leads to, I believe, parents becoming parents for the right reasons, parents
being passionate about being parents. And then people who aren't yet ready or never want to end up doing what is fulfilling to them or at least giving it a go. And we don't end up with people just because like they're societally forced to into situations that won't be good for them or the family. But it is so hard not to bring up whenever Pearl makes any of these points. Why that's not how she lives at all. We've joked about this too with Candace Owens' book, Make Him a Sandwich. And you're like, it's always the biggest part in the term, girl boss, because that of course would just be a boss, but we'll use it for these purposes. It's always the biggest girl bosses in right wing media who tell you there shouldn't be girl bosses. Wait, but you're one, which is great. I'm glad. Yay. What? What is this? What is this? We're doing that. Book coverage. Oh, sorry. And so it's
a similar here. Pearl has prioritized her career. Cool. Great. But in her world, that's like one of the ills to our society is that women have done that. And that's clearly why she was so insecure about that being brought up by Z. There. And honestly, I have yet to meet a right wing. I'm talking right wing conservative because there's a lot of conservatives who actually agree with a lot of liberal social principles about like as long as you're not harming other people, you should be able to live life. You want whether I'm comfortable with or not, whatever. But like real right wingers who think going way back would be the best thing for us socially and what the norms are and what people are pressured into. They never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever abide by those principles ever. I've met zero influencers. And I met a lot of the right wing influencers said this or at least seen enough of their content. It's never the case or heard enough scuttle but in the grapevine. And they always want to live their life under a liberal society where they can do what
they want. But they want to espouse for ideological reasons but usually it just clicks and content. A world view that says we shouldn't allow for any of the freedoms that come along with a liberal social ideology. It's all very tragic. And again, I just have never gotten the vibe from Pearl that she's like really glad that this is the career she ended up choosing. Because then you kind of put yourself in a corner. And there was a moment there. I think during the wave of as people call it like a wokeness, there was this backlash to it that launched an extreme right wing social ideology that got some attention like and your tape and stuff. And so then people jumped on that wave but that wave kind of died down. The Andriotate fandom is just a few in cells holding signs saying free Andriotate now. Like it's really diminished. You know what I mean? And same thing with this, you can only, even if you're like a really insecure guy who needs female right wing influencers to tell you that you're correct in their terrible, you can only hear them say it some way
times before you get bored. And so that wave has crashed. But then what is Pearl going to do like pivot to more thoughtful content? You're kind of stuck. You have years of documentation that this is who you are. So then you just have to go one debate after another to get a little bit of click is to get a little bit of money to pay the bills. And you just have to sit there and be like, yeah, women's on. They're so bad. They're kids next to bait. Oh, I hate that for her. I'm sorry. I really am sorry. Do you guys know Ron White? I'm not familiar, but I guess he's a comedian and and was on Joe Rogan's podcast. And it was just very satisfying. I don't know if we'll even make this into a segment, but watching him inform Rogan of just how bad can Paxen is in a very Texan dude kind of way. And Rogan be like, whoa, was really fun to see that especially that Rogan's audience, very large audience is hearing it from this messenger.
Because like I could I'm still waiting on the invite from Rogan, but I could go sit down there and explain to him why Talleriko is a much better candidate than Paxen. And I think some people would be compelled because I would make I guess people would say like excellent arguments. I don't know exactly how to describe. You know, the brilliant spine. But but it still is a messenger that has been liberal ever since I started putting content out there and known for being liberal and gay, etc. Right. So it would hit a little different, but when Ron White, I mean his last name is White. Okay. Um, sits there asleep tear, come talk, lowest an accent. And he's in the Rogan's sphere. I think it hits a little different for the audience. Let's listen. Tell her you didn't cost this state six million dollars in fines and lawsuits. That happened to Paxen. So by the way, let me go by I'll start that over so you can hear this uninterrupted. But if I do go on Rogan, no one in my audience point out if I talk differently. Okay. Just everyone pretend like you
don't notice it and go in the comments and say, what do you mean that's how he always talks. And then if they make split screens of me talking normally and then talking the way I'm going to talk on there, just be like, that's literally the same type of voice. I don't know what we're talking about. Because I do think that if I do a little bit of this, mommy, mommy, listen, Joe, here's the thing. Back to the mind right now. I was back when I was strangling a duck. It kept going quack, quack. It was getting back to this quack. Right. Just gaslight everyone and pretend that's how I normally talked. Where is his penis? Tell me you didn't cost this state $6 million in fines and lawsuits and that happened to Paxen. How did he cost? What did he do? Paxen? Yeah. What did he do that cost $6 million? Well, back in 2020, eight of his assistants turned him into the FBI for fraud.
One of them was a 50 year Texas Ranger. He fired that guy five decades of service in the Texas Rangers. Well, that guy sued him and they fired four of the eight people that turned him in. He did fired him. And then he realized that he was going to get fucking sued over it. And he came up with the solution. He was going to give them $3 million to settle this case. And then the house said, no, it's not coming from us. And then they sued one six million dollars. And guess who paid that $6 million? You and me paid the $6 million for his bribery. You know, how he ever got out of this stuff? He was impeached by the house. His own party impeached him 121 votes to 22. And then the Senate put him back in because they didn't want to lose the seat. And, uh, but he's a criminal. Just a piece of shit. And, uh, I don't know enough about him. But I do know that their surprise
of Tallahuret goes ahead of him and the polls. I'm not. And I think that people are sick of what's going on right now in Texas. That they've been in control for 30 years. What have they given us? Let somebody else fucking drive. You know, I, but, but, I'm really jacking with my marijuana and I'm ready to give so true. So, so, so, thank you, Ron. That's exactly right. He nailed it. I got nervous when Rogan said, what did, wait, what did he do that cost $6 million? And Ron kind of paused. And I thought he might not know the specifics. And then he lists off perfectly recounting the specifics of how can Paxton retaliated against staffers who were accusing him of bribery and corruption? And so that was a part of the corruption was that he was retaliating and trying to get rid of people who were calling him out for this. And so then whenever these things get settled and, and if we have to pay out the, uh, damages, we're just getting double ruined by his behavior.
And I would love, I know Rogan had Tallahuret go on and I do appreciate that. I would love him to just get real engaged. You remember when you made that whole thing of I'm leaving California? It's all bad because of governance. And it's the politicians and you gave this huge boost to Republicans by going, and I'm moving to Texas. Yes, woo, it's better. Woo. And then you move there. And you know, I love it a lot more. Great. I love Austin. I mean, every person who says they want to leave a liberal area to go to a conservative area always goes to the most liberal area in the conservative state. But okay, welcome. And it's so funny. Go move to Amarillo. Okay? Fine. Love. I love the people of Amarillo. Sounds like Armadillo. Yeah. And so all love, but like, they never do that. These famous people who make a big stink of leaving a liberal state. Oh, Texas have gone to Iberlo. And then they always go to the most. It's not even like he went to a big city, Houston, that will vote liberal. Like he went to the most liberal city. Austin, keep Austin
weird as our slogan. We were wearing thongs in public before it was cool. We were doing it in a non-pride context just on a bike. Have you ever seen a thong on a bike I have since I was like three years old because I live in Austin, keep Austin weird. We had a whole community of cat people before cat people were a thing. You might not know this. People would actually get like tails stitched onto their body to be in a cat community in Austin. And then they would walk around and you just say, what's up? And you give them some some cat. That's just what you do. It's like, that's how liberal. And that's where he moves. And he's like, I love Texas. Way better. No, you're not in Texas. You're in Austin. Anywho. Sorry. That's a little aside. But if you're going to make that much of a stink about it, then maybe get engaged in Texas politics because now this is the state that you're kind of outching for. And it doesn't seem based on what Ron was saying there
that you knew about that particular story. I would love for you to shed some light on it. And then also, hey, you might have thought it sounded silly. It's not silly. The marijuana obsession from Texas Republicans, like when they could solve other problems. And instead they're making the felony to have like ever even smelled marijuana. Is weed. I should probably say weed. I don't know why I keep seeing marijuana. He said marijuana. So I said marijuana. Didn't we learn that has like a weird background that term? Didn't we? Wasn't it? I can't remember. I always called it the devil's lettuce. And so sometimes I forget the correct term. Here's one of the clip. Because we need better teachers. We need more teachers. We need the public school system beefed up. We're getting the shit beat out of us in education. And I think Talleriko was really, really good for that. And I think you're a smart, honest man. I hope he never gets sucked into the corruption of all the money, like most people do. But you know, you really can't put kinpaxed in back in
office in the state of Texas. That guy's just too corrupt. You know, he's just a bad egg. And we don't need him around here. A really, really bad egg. And I have jokes that I want to make. But I don't want to make them at the same time. And so let's just put it this way. You know how they were trying to hold liable IVF clinics for every single fertilized egg. Because you will fertilize multiple ones and then you implant one of them. So then you might dispose of the other ones. Because it's just a blob, right? And for a while there, the abortion bands put at risk IVF clinics because then they would count all of those as murderers. What? Then you're not going to be able to have IVF, which would be two bunch of people who wanted kids not be able to have them. One of the other important reasons that I think they should not be held to that liability is in case one of
those eggs they needed to dispose of is compacted. Because he's a bad egg. I wanted to make you forget that that's what I was talking about. But it came off like a JD Vance bit. Oh yeah, I hope that one paid off. Are you guys? I'm tired. That may be tired. Okay, everyone take a breath. Everybody take a breath here. Speaking of bad eggs. Democratic asterisk. Senator John Federman was repeatedly asked, hey, are you going to switch to being a Republican? What's the deal there? You recently went on like a retreat with Fox News executives.
And you only ever appear on Fox News. And you only ever talk about Trump when it's in a positive context these days. And then you spend more time attacking your own party than anybody else, which is bizarre. In a time when the other party has all the power and are doing really bad things with it, you could criticize your own side. Great. Love it. Do it. Good. Healthy discourse. But like something's off right whenever the other party has all the branches of the government and is currently doing a bunch of bad stuff. Wouldn't that be a little bit more of your focus as a democratic senator who promised us you weren't going to mention us or cinema us, meaning you weren't going to run as more progressive and then shift to the right. And then you did that. Well, Federman got very upset at this reporter after like 30 seconds of the same question being asked. Finally, he goes, ah, what do you think about that? People claiming to be reformers average. People believe that that's real.
What about the Wall Street Journal report? Do you have any response to that? There were a lot of Democrats in your party that are especially concerned about the reporting in that Wall Street Journal piece. Do you have any response to them? Are you guys getting off? Yeah. You're going up? No, no, you're okay. Go ahead. The way the government crack parties go right now, there's a chance to become a Republican I'm not going to be a Republican. And a white case, you guys just wait till the midterm, you know, and if I turn to a Republican and then I'll be a liar then like it's just like my name. Bar. That's that's poetic. Why don't you just wait then until the midterm's then and then if I become a Republican then I'll be a liar then true. And by the way, you know, all love, all love.
I get that that's because he had a stroke. You can still giggle. And you just can't, okay? I feel bad for the stroke part, but it's still okay because I said so. Republican and then I'll be a liar then like it's just like my name is not on the ballot. Like chill and wait for the midterm here. I've always been a Democrat. It's like no matter how many times I say that, I'm still getting asked just getting into the elevator. Hey, you want to turn around? Hey, sir, you want to turn your head? Or at least, or at least could I draw a smiley face on the back of your head that I can talk to? Because this is strange that you keep talking to the elevator even though you're obviously responding to the question that I asked. So the way he said that instead of been like, no,
I'm not going to become a Republican. I saw him in his John Stewart interview say, and apparently this is true, that he still votes with Democrats like 90 plus percent of the time. And so he doesn't like that question. He feels like it's unfair. All right. But just answer like an adult and say no, no matter how many times you ask this, I'm not going to become Republican instead of doing the baby voice. Are you giving me a zi? I already said I'm not going to wait until the midterm. Then I'll be a liar then. I don't like the way he says that too. It's like a grand reveal. Just wait until the midterm and then you can call me a liar after if I become a Republican, which I'm not. But wait and see. He's not up for reelection till 2028. So I guess that's part of his point. But I don't know. Whenever Democrats go on Montana retreats with retreats with Fox News executives, I get curious what they're thinking. Democratic Senator John Federman, who has been known to
buck his party, attended a retreat in Montana featuring key figures at Fox News. Wow. That is very invited to the event by the owners of the network. He is on Fox News more than he is at his own house. It seems like. You remember that reporting? I'm going to botch it, but it was like there was actively somebody hanging on the edge of a cliff and John was standing right there. It was a little kid and he was holding 500 puppies. He said, I'm about to die if you don't grab my hand. And John Federman was reaching down and then Fox News called and said, hey, Israel is about to do a new round of attacks. Do you want to talk about that and tell us how much you love this war on Fox News and then Federman walked away and let the person drop with all of the puppies down into a ravine and went into Fox News and said, it wasn't that, but it was something like that. He ignored some event with like kids with cancer or something. I can't remember.
And so I'll just keep saying more and more extreme examples until I remember. And he did it to go on to go on Fox News and defend the Iran War no doubt. And I was yesterday, so you probably saw the viral clips of John Stewart interviewing Federman and he pressed him, we went over this on a lot of different things. And then I decided I'd only watch clips from it. I went yesterday and watched the whole thing. And it was way more painful in its full context than just the clips because about every question John Stewart would kindly and thoughtfully and non-provocatively ask John a clarifying question. And he would set it up with a good background, lay it out, make the clear question, you know, make the question clear. And then John would just blur out something completely unrelated or barely related. So here's an example. They've been talking about how much Federman is saying the Democratic Party is going socialist and communist. And John
Stewart is like, hey, you know, I am perfectly fine with you calling out people if you think they have irrational views. But like, don't you think your caricaturing a little bit where the main stream of the Democratic Party is? And don't you think it's a little silly to pretend like being too far left was Kamala Harris's problem during an election where she ran on like the most milk toast moderate things? And, and then he kind of flipped it after not getting any progress on that because John kept you saying, I don't know, I don't know communism. And said, okay, let's think about it this way. Here's an historical example of the more far left part of the movement being channeled for a good cause as opposed to just in fighting. You can in fight, but you could also harness that populist energy for something that you see to be pragmatic. And watch as John lays this out for like a minute to really make clear what he's asking. And then see if you think Federman answer the question. So here's here's what I'm trying to to get at is that you're saying
the argument is between capitalism the way it is. You get what you get you don't get upset or socialism and communism. And I'm saying the greatest threat to capitalism is that it's not delivering for the majority of people because the system is rigged for those who have capital and investment money. There's a million different ways that they do it. Lower tax rates on capital than labor, on tax or barely tax unrealized gains, corporate tax cuts, corporate loopholes, offshoring friendly rules. There's there's a million different things. So let's go back to the thirties. In the 20s and 30s, Norman Thomas was the socialist candidate for for president. Eugene Debs was a candidate for president. These were socialist. They were people that they felt like it was the guild at age inequality. It wasn't working for people. So the depression hit. The new deal basically incorporated a lot of those socialist ideas for
a social safety net for better laws for labor unions benefited greatly from that. Those reforms and a lot of that energy came from what you would call the dirt bag left at that time. I would say saved capitalism and saved America from having more of a more socialist or communist type revolution. And don't you think we would be better off using the energy from the left for ideas like banning corporate money and strengthening labor unions. All stuff that I imagine you support rather than denigrating them and caricaturing them. Why not work with them so that the capitalist system you love? What does that mean by working with them? And so overall, I don't necessarily agree with
everything of your argument. Sure. Well, it's like the great depression. We're not in a great depression and the economy continues to grow overall and without a doubt. And then some things are too expensive without a doubt there are. But eventually I think the market will address that. Back in 24 the whole world was eggs eggs eggs eggs eggs out of control. And now then when it returned back to a normal price, people don't talk about eggs anymore. So it's a lot of these other thing. You know, overall and then World War II. And that reminds the world that we saved we saved democracy in our country and we are the good guy. Yes, we love that we beat it up. What is that? I love it. Poor John the whole time was like, wait no, no, no, no, no. Because he started with shorter questions that you would assume the context for, right? Then he realized those weren't settling in. So he thought maybe if I give more information to
give a nicely packaged question, he'll get it. And then John's like, well, you know, we're not in the Great Depression eggs were high, but now they're low. So we beat the Nazis. No, wait, but of course the point John's making is Federman's obsession at a time when the right wing has all the power with exclusively calling out what he sees as the irrational parts of the left wing is strategically bizarre. It is as a principle strange. You could make those criticisms without it becoming your whole political project. But also it ignores that you could. And this is what I try to do with quote unquote wacky ideas on the left is see if there's anything that could be channeled, right? And so if you had a particular suggestion and I went through this with producer Kayla in a whole discussion where like we would lay out what's what's the socialist suggestion? And if
it's like get rid of all private property, I'm gonna say that. Well, that's a bad idea. Or if people are like abolish all police or ballers by that's about it. But here's what I think you're getting at. And this I think we can agree on. We need to fix the flaws in our capitalist system. We need to do that through public policy and some of the policy suggestions that have solved the gaps in our capitalist economy have been socialistic ideas that plug the holes where there are holes that need to be plugged. And that can be harnessed for good things or you can just spend the whole time being like you're all idiots. But what was asked earlier that we went over in the previous interview was like, okay, but why? Why do you think there's more quote unquote extremism as you describe it? This was a different question, John asked. Don't you think it has something to do with the failures of of course they're probably imparted, but then you're a party too to properly serve people. People start looking for more extreme solutions when the problems go unresolved for a super long time. And again, instead of being like, yeah, I don't want to subscribe to bad ideas.
But I agree with you the more radical suggestions come from the place of thinking the previous more moderate suggestions haven't worked. And it's like that could be a great answer. It doesn't concede on any particular issue, but it still speaks to your understanding of people's sentiment. John goes nowhere like that. John Vetterman to be clear. That's kind of confusing too, John. Watch it continue. Guys, and there are people on the far left now they're making it seem that America is the problem or we are the we are the aggressor or we are behind many of the troubles here across the globe. In other words, if L. Syed or AOC or Bernie Sanders has proposals that strengthen a social safety net or readjust corporate tax rates or change the way that or here's just a simple one tax capital capital gains in the same way you would tax salaries. Like work is
for suckers. Work is taxed at a higher level than investments. Doesn't that tilt the playing field to people who already have money and if the progressive left is saying these are the types of things that we need to do. Wouldn't that appeal to you? Well, what appeals to me is eliminating unlimited money and politics without a doubt. And that's a position that they hold. Well, it's it's not they they don't own that. It's like I've been saying that I mean any reason we don't we don't go anywhere. We don't go anywhere at all. Then he just says a bunch of stuff. John Stewart tried his very best. He tried his very very best. Now again, John Vetterman does vote with Democrats most of the time. And I think if a Democratic president got into power, I don't think Vetterman's going to win his reelection primary. So I don't think we'll have to worry about this. But let's say he did and then he stayed Senator and a Democratic president came in. I'm sure on the most action items, Vetterman would vote. It's kind of like what we went through with Manchin. Okay,
Manchin actually voted with Democrats most of the time. So he preferred that then our public in Miami, they win. But people forget that your voting record isn't everything. It's very significant. And I do think we should bring discussions there more often. But also your advocacy matters too. A lot of being a person in position power is the messages that you're sending. And the only message we hear from Vetterman ever is against his party. And in favor, like recently, I should say in favor of Trump. And then if you get pressed, it's like, no, I have all these issues with Trump. And yes, you know, in the center of the, he said, I said, doing bad things and all that. But he really has it made that his focus, which is why he's invited on Fox News every two seconds. And up here at the RNC endorsing his Republican Pennsylvania Senate colleague, I mean, just like you're making a promo video at the RNC. And a
time like this, which Josh Johnson pointed out, he just campaigned for them. Exactly. Don Stone, member for two months says, calling myself a basely, a beastly babe live for Jaden's reactions and clean, beautiful call. Come back soon, Kayla. This is it. Beasley in right up here. This is everyone in our village. And then our babes are beastly babes. We love our alliteration. And then our younger viewers are our beastly's binkies. And then our brosiffs are our beastly boys or beastly bros. I like it. I like it a lot. Where does the beastialities fit into that? Oh, Jaden. I got one. I don't know why I made an animal noise. I think that's it for us. I just realized I need to go desperately fast. So I got to get my teeth cleaned. So they're all nice and pretty for you. So I'm going to leave. But that's today's show. And we will not have a bonus show
today. Okay. Apologies. But we won't have a bonus show. But we back with normal scheduled shows tomorrow. Much love. Talk to you all then.
More episodes
