Redistricting Reckoning at the Supreme Court

Voting Rights Act Section 2 takes center stage as the Supreme Court hears Louisiana v. Callais, a case that could reshape how majority-Black districts are drawn and how far race can be used in mapmaking. Todd walks through what Section 2 actually says, why lower courts demanded two majority-Black districts in Louisiana, and how equal protection concerns collide with vote-dilution claims. Then we zoom out to 2026: redistricting pushes in states like Texas and California, shifting prediction-market odds, and why a modest Democratic edge on the generic ballot may not be enough. Todd also reacts to CNN’s Harry Enten on the changing House outlook, explains why both parties suddenly care about “gerrymandering truces,” and frames what it all means for Trump’s agenda and the fight for the House.