Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsSep 21, 202621:06

Centre punch: Germany’s state-election shocker

Get every episode summarized

Each time The Intelligence from The Economist publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

About this episode

“Every person on your team loses up to seven hours a week doing the work behind the work, submitting expenses, matching receipts and booking travel. Using AI and automation, Perk can do that work bringing travel and spend together in one place.”From the transcript

Two more state-election results reveal surging support for both the far-right AfD and the populist-left Die Linke parties. Chancellor Friedrich Merz himself described the outcome as a disaster; what will it mean for him? Our correspondent looks into why there is so much enthusiasm for African stocks. And what the science says about blue-light exposure and sleep. 


Guests and host:

  • Tom Nuttall, Berlin bureau chief
  • Ọrẹ Ogunbiyi, Africa correspondent
  • Sam Wikeley, science correspondent
  • Rosie Blau, co-host of “The Intelligence”
  • Jason Palmer, co-host of “The Intelligence”


Topics covered: 

  • German politics, Friedrich Merz, AfD, Die Linke
  • African stockmarkets, Aliko Dangote
  • sleep science, blue light


Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to The Economist.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Know when Sam Wikeley turns up

Follow Sam Wikeley and once a week we email you every new episode they appeared on — including guest spots the show notes never mention, because we read the transcript.

Follow Sam Wikeley

Free. Pick your own day and time.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

262 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Centre punch: Germany’s state-election shocker

The Intelligence from The Economist

0:00
21:06

Full transcript

The Intelligence from The Economist — Centre punch: Germany’s state-election shocker. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

This intelligence podcast is sponsored by Perk, the intelligent platform for travel and spend. Every person on your team loses up to seven hours a week doing the work behind the work, submitting expenses, matching receipts and booking travel. Using AI and automation, Perk can do that work bringing travel and spend together in one place. Enjoy three months without platform fees when you sign up at Perk.com forward slash the intelligence. That's Perk.com forward slash the intelligence. New US-based corporate customers only, terms apply. This intelligence podcast is sponsored by Business Travel on Hotels.com. Does booking business travel feel like another job? Hotels.com makes booking work trips easy and rewarding. It's easy because you can set your preferences once and get results tailored to your business travel needs every time. It's rewarding because with Hotels.com's free rewards program, you can save instantly on your next work trip and earn rewards for future travel. Book faster with confidence at Hotels.com, low-lifteam members 18 plus.

The Economist. Hello and welcome to the Intelligence from the Economist. I'm Jason Palmer. And I'm Rosie Blow. Today on the show why African stock markets are having a field day and the truth about blue light before bed. But first, another set of results are in from elections to state parliaments in Germany and it's not looking good for Chancellor Friedrich Merz and his Christian Democratic Union. In the city state of Berlin and in the northern state of Mecklenburg-Worpommern, the CDU again got a kicking this time from both ends of the political spectrum.

In Mecklenburg-Worpommern, it was the same story as in Saxony Unholt, a couple of weeks ago. Before right alternative for Germany or AFD party surged. But in Berlin, it was the populist left that made a surprising showing. All that puts Mr. Merz on thin ice, but he put on a brave face. But exactly that's why we can't get these decisions now. The reforms must come. He says he'll press ahead with a package of reforms that he reckons can fix what Ails Germany. But German voters don't seem quite so confident. The Christian Democratic Union, the conservative party of Friedrich Merz, the Chancellor, failed for the first time in its history to enter a state parliament in Mecklenburg-Worpommern. Tom Nuddle is our Berlin bureau chief. They took 4.9% of the vote just below the 5% that you need to make it in.

And before these elections, that was regarded as a kind of acid test for Merz, who's in serious trouble in his party. If the CDU failed to make it into that parliament, then the sense was that things were going to get really, really hairy for Merz. And that is exactly what's happened. And so who did win in Mecklenburg-Worpommern? The populist right alternative for Germany came first with around 38% of the vote. The social democrats who run the state pushed into a very close second spot with 35% of the vote. And they are likely to continue running the state because no other party will work with the AFD. The second problem for Merz and for the CDU is that in Berlin, the capital, which is currently run by a coalition led by the CDU delinca party of the hard left had a fantastic result. And the chances are that they will now be able to form a coalition that doesn't have the CDU in it, so they will fall into opposition there as well.

And how did Mr Merz respond to all of that? Well, it was interesting. About 10 minutes after the exit polls in both states dropped at 6 pm, Merz came out and made a short speech to the press corps in the capital. This is very unusual for a chancellor to do this on the evening of the state election. And there was a little bit of speculation. He's going to announce he's going to quit. There's been all sorts of speculation about this in recent days. But no, that's not what he did at all. Does he have a microphone? Can we not talk about it? It's a disaster. He said that the result in Mecklenburg for Pommel was a disaster for this CDU. And that was before we knew actually that it had fallen out of the state parliament. He said he was worried about what he called the authoritarian poison dripping into German politics. These reformers are in the middle against authoritarianism, that with the fascination of authoritarianism. But he said to channel his inner Churchill essentially that he was going to keep buggering on.

He was not going to quit as leader of the CDU. He was not going to quit as chancellor. And crucially, he was going to stick to the reform path of his coalition government in Germany. Remind us about the reform path. Few months ago, the coalition agreed to quite a comprehensive set of pension labor market, other economic reforms that now need to be approved in parliament. And he said that not only was the government going to stick to this path, but sticking to the path was the best way to tackle the populists of left and right. But clearly with these results now in hand, that job is going to be harder. Yeah, particularly now that the CDU has fallen out of the parliament in Mecklenburg for Pommel. I think the pressure on Mecklenburg is only going to increase. And the next couple of days, I think, could be crucial for his future. There's going to be all sorts of conversations taking place within the party, including a lot of the associations in the German states, which are very important. Power brokers, including some of the state premiers,

may have something to say. Those premiers did actually back him in a letter that they all signed last week. So you're probably not going to see some sort of dramatic push led by one of these associations the next few days. But with these results, with Mecklenburg's approval ratings, barely in double figures these days, with no sense that they really have some kind of strategy to reverse their fortunes, I find it quite difficult to imagine that he and this government can just carry on as if nothing has happened. So I think we are potentially now entering quite a fee-brile moment in German politics. But what seems clear from these results in particular is that this is not just simply a shift of the German electorate to the right, but generally a way in both directions from the center. Yeah, I think if you stand back, then you can get quite a clear indication that politics in Germany is really fragmenting its fraying to an extent it's radicalizing.

I mean, we shouldn't draw too many conclusions from elections in two of Germany's 16 states, both of which are relatively small. But nevertheless, you can see some examples here of what's happening across the country. Essentially, it's becoming much, much more difficult for the traditional parties of the center to impose their agendas and to govern and to put together stable coalitions. In Berlin, where D. Linker is likely to form a government, their signature issue is the forced expropriation of the properties of corporate landlords, which obviously is highly, highly contentious and could be extremely damaging to the reputation of the city amongst investors. But that's what that party is pushing for. And they now claim that they have a mandate. The AFD perhaps didn't do quite as well as it might have hoped to have done yesterday, but it's come first in a German state election for the third time in Saxony Unhelped, which had an election two weeks ago. There's still every chance that the AFD, which took 44%

of the vote there, could find itself leading a government for the first time ever in Germany. So we really are now entering uncharted territory in a country that was once a byword for political stability. It's now becoming something rather different. Thanks very much for joining us, Tom. Thanks, Jason. This economist podcast is sponsored by Scribt. The knowledge platform with more than 350 million documents shared by real people. Whatever you're working on, Scribt is where you go to find information, build understanding and get it done. And if you're a student or educator in the US, a valid school email address gets you a discounted subscription plan. Head to Scribt.com to claim yours. That's s-c-r-i-b-d.com must be 18 or over. Okay, real talk. Every time I open up my inbox,

I've got this vision of the day I'm going to have. Deep work, big ideas, the project I keep meaning to start. Three hours of vanish into replying to threads and hunting down a file someone sent last week. I've tried AI tools that promised to fix this. They didn't. They were just another tab I had to open, explain myself to, and abandon my Thursday. Superhuman is different. It's at your service, not after your job. It's already where you work. So I'm never starting from a blank tab. It's from the makers of crammerly, living right inside of the tools I already use, like Gmail and Slack. When I'm drafting a message or making sense of a messy thread, it just helps. Like a thought partner that's already caught up. So we get to the hard part together. The problem was never too little time. It's that busy work crowds out the work that actually matters. Start streamlining your workflows with superhuman. Try today at superhuman.com. We want to democratize the company. We want to have everybody yourself, driver,

everybody in my own driver, my mother, everybody will now come and have a stake. Aliko Dango-T is Africa's biggest tycoon. Currently worth around 30 billion dollars. But he's about to be worth a whole lot more. All right, Aliko and Bee, our Africa correspondent, is based in Nigeria. He owns several businesses, including the Dango-T petroleum refinery, a huge complex which I took a tour of back in February. I caught up with Dango-T again last week just before the company launched the biggest African IPO in history. I just want every single African to take a stake in this refinery. If the company reaches its 50 billion dollar valuation by November when shares begin trading on the Nigerian exchange, it could become the most valuable listed firm in Africa. All right, it was by no means certain that Dango-T was going to list the company in Nigeria. Why

is he decided to do so? Ever since the refinery kicked off, he's been very clear that this is all about Africa's energy security. And so I think this is still in line with that. Even though he's toyed with listing other bits of his businesses in London, he's been really keen that the stocks of the refinery are available for Nigerians and Africans more broadly to buy into. So that's why he's decided to list on Nigeria's stock exchange. And are Nigerians buying? Well, sort of. The stocks are actually beginning trading until November. But what's open now is a window for people to bid for all the shares that they want. And people really are subscribing. This IPO has come at a time when the stock market has become a lot more accessible for first-time investors. So you've even got people in rural areas, for example, buying stock on many points of sales terminals down the road or just from their local bank. You've got Africans and a diaspora buying in as well. You've got these wealth tech startups advising people how to invest from the comfort of their phones. And it does seem that they're actually doing it. The demand has actually been so overwhelming that

several banking and trading apps like Bamboo, for example, actually crashed when the IPO opened. Dangolese says he wants many shareholders. That this IPO is for everyone. So we're trying to make sure that in future one will have been our unknown general meeting. We'll hold it in the stadium. We want to make what you call history. And whether or not it fills arenas, stock picking is certainly becoming a much more popular sport across the continent. Is stock picking a big thing then? Well, it's becoming a much bigger one. And this is partly because retail investors are buying up shares on their phones and helping to lift Africa's stock markets. So if you look at the Nigerian benchmark index, that's up by 71% in dollar terms just this year. On par with South Korea's. If you look at Garners as well, that's increased by 50%. If you look at Zambia's in March, that index was twice what it had been a year before. And it stayed about that high ever since. Now, just to put that in perspective, African markets are quite small

by global standards, accounting for less than 1% of global market capitalizations. But with all these new entrants, with all these new people who are interested in buying stocks, they're becoming a little bit deeper and less fickle. And the stocks on the African markets next to the frothy valuations in many other parts of the world are beginning to look more and more affordable. Who exactly then is buying? Well, it's lots of people who weren't buying these stocks before. So what's happened is you've got FinTech startups who are helping make this process a lot easier. They've taken a lot of the paperwork out of the equation. And now people are doing this from the comfort of their phones. Lots of these companies, these FinTech startups are pitching, investing in stocks as a safer way of saving money than shoving bundles of cash under your mattress. And lots of people are following suit. So Bamboo, one of these startups, lets it's 2.3 million users across Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya and South Africa, invest in local and foreign stocks using their phones. And their user base is actually quite interesting. So in the first quarter of 2026, there was more trading

of Nigerian stocks on the Bamboo app for the first time than American ones. So Richmond Bassi, who is a boss at Bamboo, told me that Bamboo is focused directly on African consumers. Think about the nurse in Yaba. Think about trade-as in the market that didn't think that the stock market was something that was for them. And but those are the customers that we essentially were building for. But these millions of users are actually only caching in very little. The average trade on Bamboo is less than $50. So lots of these new retail investors are people who don't have very much. But for entrepreneurs like Dangote, it all adds up. Isn't there some risk to this? Definitely. There's a lot of risk, especially in markets like these that are historically quite shallow and volatile. The prospect of spectacular gains also presents the prospect of spectacular losses. And for low earners, the people who are investing around $50, they have the most to lose. So you can look at Malawi, for example. They had an incredible

ball run last year in their stocks. But that ended with a 20% correction this year. So lots of people lost money. The same TikTok users who are telling people to invest in their favorite banks were the same people who turned around and warned them that actually investing in the stock market is a roller coaster and a big boy game and people needed to be careful. The real liquidity, the one that's actually going to shift these markets is still going to come primarily from those deep pocketed institutional investors and maybe even some foreign ones as well. It sounds like international markets may still then play some kind of role. Exactly. And I think even Dangote knows that he's already thinking about a secondary listing in New York just a few years from now. But by also listing in Africa by bringing all this attention to these markets, Dangote may also attract more domestic smart money. Africa's most dynamic economies from Zambia to Ghana are already doing this. And this current upswing according to analysts that I've spoken to might last a few years. Beyond that though, who knows? And that's

where the risk question comes in. But for now, people are really excited about the prospects of Africa's stock markets. All right, thank you very much. Thanks so much for having me Rosie. The studio is nice and dark. And despite it being the morning, science correspondent Sam Whiteley is here for a bedtime story about blue light. Now Sam, I'm a bit scared to ask you this question. But despite being a devout reader, I have a tendency to actually scroll on my phone for ages before bed. And I suspect you're going to tell me that's a terrible idea, aren't you? Well, you are certainly not alone. And I am guilty of this too. As are many other people. So a recent survey showed that more than 40%

of respondents use a screen every night in the hour before bed. And a number of studies have linked evening screen use with poor sleep. So I wanted to know if it is really that bad and decided to dive into the research. And what did you find? Well, the connection here appears to be to do with blue light. So artificial light from screens often has a lot of blue in its spectrum, which has led to many pinning the blame on blue light specifically. And this has led to a whole slew of different products that claim to filter out these blue frequencies. There are blue blocking glasses. There are settings on phones that will dim the blue wavelengths. And there are even screen attachments and supplements that promise to protect the eyes from blue wavelengths from the inside. But the evidence justifying this bias against blue is hardly clear. So before we get to the evidence, what's wrong with blue light? Well, the link between blue light and sleep is not completely unreasonable. So the body's daily rhythm is conducted by what's called

the circadian clock. This makes sure that you feel alert in the morning and drowsy in the evening. And it is light that sets this tempo. So there are a handful of cells in the eye that contain this light-sensitive pigment called melanopsin. So they don't assist in vision, but simply send signals to the brain circadian clock that suppresses the production of melatonin. So this is this hormone which induces night-related physiological processes. And that syncs the body to the Earth's day-night cycle. And mel-nopsin is particularly sensitive to light-with wavelengths of around 480 nanometers, which is squarely in the blue region of light's spectrum. And yet you say this evidence is now in question. Well, the link between blue light and the suppression of melatonin is uncontroversial. That is not the issue. The question is really whether everyday exposure to blue light will have any clear, sizable impact. So there was one major study published in 2015,

which asked a dozen participants to read either a print book or an electronic book for four hours before bed in an otherwise dimly lit room to judge its effects. And what they found is that those reading screens had a roughly 50% reduction in melatonin compared to the print readers and also took longer to fall asleep. That sounds like pretty good evidence. Blue light's bad. Well, I don't know about you, but for me, four hours of reading before bed is quite a long time. I'm rarely hitting those numbers. And even with that excessive amount of time, the e-readers only took an average of about 10 minutes longer to fall asleep than the print readers. So the following year in 2016, there was another study. And here the authors lowered the reading time for each group to only two hours and also exposed the participants to a constant bright white light for about 6.5 hours during the day. They found no differences between the groups in melatonin levels as well as

sleep parameters like onset or duration of sleep. So what the scientists concluded is that a person's light history, their prior exposure to light throughout the day will affect their sensitivity to it in the evening. So where does that leave us in terms of bedtime? What are we supposed to do? It puts us in a bit of a complicated position. And Russell Foster, who is an expert in sleep science, he told me that these blue light studies are just swamped with complications. And he stressed that we need to be very careful when extrapolating away from these lab-based experiments and advising people about what they should do before they go to bed. And what's more, the power of blue blocking glasses is also very unclear. So there was a review of 17 trials in 2023 that found no clear evidence of blue blocking glasses impact on sleep. And the effectiveness of blue filtering software on screens is similarly inconclusive. So Jim scrolling is fine. Well, what we can say is that you should

try to minimize light exposure before you go to bed. That is not necessarily about avoiding these blue wavelengths. It's more about avoiding bright white light. So regardless of its source, bright white light increases your alertness and can shift your circadian clock. That itself is not settled, you know, how bright and for how long that exposure should be to shift the circadian clock is still uncertain, but it does make sense to reduce your exposure. So scroll away to your heart's content before bed, but before buying a pair of blue blocking specs, you're probably better just dimming the brightness on your screen. Sam, thank you very much. Thanks very much. That's all for this episode of The Intelligence. We'll see you back here tomorrow.

With no fees or minimums on checking accounts, it's no wonder the Capital One bank guy is so passionate about banking with Capital One. If he were here, he wouldn't just tell you about no fees or minimums. He'd also talk about how most Capital One cafes are open seven days a week to assist with your banking needs. Yep, even on weekends, it's pretty much all he talks about in a good way. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See CapitalOne.com slash bank Capital One NA member FDIC. Hey everyone, it's Chris Kaleboh here host of the Side Hustle School podcast. This episode is powered by AT&T Business. In my early days, I did some of my best work in parked cars or coffee shops, but when I landed my first big contract, I realized I couldn't bet my future on a public connection that cuts out if someone turns on a blender. As a small business owner, you're already

wearing at least 10 hats. You shouldn't have to be your own IT department as well. That's why I rely on AT&T Business. They keep your connectivity reliable, so you have one less thing to worry about. Powered by AT&T Business, built to work. Get AT&T Business at business.att.com.

More episodes

More from The Intelligence from The Economist

View all episodes →