Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
societySep 17, 20264:01:36

he Real Truth About HYPERGAMY (And Why Youre WRONG)

Get every episode summarized

Each time The Rational Male publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

About this episode

“Stand right in when the sheer release sequence is over. Gee, where does great intro music come from? People keep telling me I shouldn't have intro music.”From the transcript

he Real Truth About HYPERGAMY (And Why Youre WRONG)


Rational Male Series on Amazon!

https://www.amazon.com/stores/Rollo-Tomassi/author/B00J2165RA

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

4,406 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

he Real Truth About HYPERGAMY (And Why Youre WRONG)

The Rational Male

0:00
4:01:36

Full transcript

The Rational Male — he Real Truth About HYPERGAMY (And Why Youre WRONG). Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

Gonna be... Stand by ten seconds. Stand right in when the sheer release sequence is over. Run my mark. I won't express elevator to hell. Going down. Two. One. Mark. Oh. Oh. Oh. Oh. Oh. Oh.

Oh. Oh. Oh. Gee, where does great intro music come from? Such a good band. People keep telling me I shouldn't have intro music. You shouldn't do a video. You shouldn't do intro anything. I'm like, do that. You need to know what you say to that. No. It will always be a musical interlude for a talk show that I do once a week. That guy must like to hear himself talk all the time. I'm like, yeah, I do actually what I do on Sundays live from Las Vegas Nevada on the rational male. Oh boy. Here we go. Oh my gosh. Okay. I almost feel that about putting this one up. But go ahead. There we go. Alan.

Talk to us. Two of five. I was just scratching. I thought I was playing super heroes. I was playing super heroes. Yeah. I was like, I was like, I'm married. I was two or five six three two or five. I need to put on 30 pounds for the role. Okay. I need to be at least two or five. That was like my ending for the studio. You cannot show that without being for re. Okay. I want to know now. Put this into context because everybody's like debating this for for for real. All right. Was this on. Was it on season one? Or was it on season four that he's talking about all this? Bad echo, bad echo. Yeah. It was on the video. It's not on your voice. Yeah. Is it on echo cancellation? Yeah. I already turned that on. All right. Here. Let's see if we can do it. I had eight months to do it. Okay. I built a gym in my house. Okay. And I worked my ass off. You cannot believe how hard I worked. Okay. Every day. Like it was my like my life depended on it.

Hour two hours a day. So in that moment, it's time I can put the muscle on. Yes. I was like, I'm not going to do it without any help. No steroids, no testosterone, nothing. Good for you. Just hard work. So I get through it, but also coming. I was like, I had to get your surgery after the season and it was rough. And so I get to one of the season. I'm super fatigued. I'm like, things aren't working on my body. I can't breathe. I'm like, I don't know what's going on. I work out all the time. It should be feeling better. And I go to the doctor and let's do a blood panel. He's like, oh, you have no testosterone. I was like, I'm sorry. I'm going to get this. I beat it out of myself. I'm sorry. So I'm sorry about testosterone. And it was like, oh, my God, like a new me, like a new me. And ever since then, you know, it makes my job. When I first saw this, I thought, is he talking about like putting on muscle for season four or for the entire four seasons episodes, four, four seasons? Right. And if he's talking about from season one to season four,

the possibility that he might have put that kind of muscle on his doubtful that best, but he just said eight months. I had eight months to put 30 pounds of muscle on. That's what he did say. Yeah, pretty much. Right. Alan, I love you. You know, like, okay, no, I'm all right. Oh, he's got a man crush. Okay. Let me just explain something to you here. You are not putting on that kind of. I need Todd Lee MD to come on and sit. Is it humanly pot? And even with gear doing like West Watson levels of trend, I'm not sure you could put on 30 pounds of like lean muscle in eight months. Eight months. 30 pounds, eight months. I mean, you, I mean, you still got to eat like a fiend as it is, obviously, but like, is that even humanly possible? I disagree. Anyways, we'll have to, well, I'm not a doctor. Nor do I play one on the internet, but I'm going to ask Tom. I'm going to do, I'm going to go see if Todd Lee concur. If he thinks that that's something he would have to do.

Now, granted, he dude was yoked as hell on the last, on this last season. He looks bigger. He does look drier. He looks like way because he always has the ubiquitous shirts off scene where he's messing around with some chick. Who actually on this one, he says the enemy turns out to be the bad guy. But, uh, but yeah, I mean, like, I don't know, man, 30 pounds is a good thing. I mean, at 30 pounds is a, that's you, you're really stretching my, not possible. Yeah, I'm, I'm thinking, gosh, guys struggle for like 12 and 15 pounds of muscle on that. And that kind of man, that much, that's like Ronnie Coleman level of like muscularity. When people work out and try to get lean or lose weight or bulk up or whatever, right? You're really not gaining that much muscle. Yeah. You're getting mostly fat. He's still got to trim down. He's still got to, he's still got to get down to like fighting weight too. So you can see, you can put on 30 pounds. And also, can you see it? Yeah. Is the next thing. All right. All right. Here we go.

Oh gosh. And in other news, I did Shaolin. And I propose and she says, yes. Now she, uh, maybe felt like she was forced to make a decision. She could have said, no. Um, but not a couple days after that. She tells me, you know, before you get married, I got to go this guy. And I'm like, because her story is that I ruined her life and gave her a crazy depression because I left her. But the actuality is she told me that then she took off the ring by March. But I proposed in December took off the ring by March. And we had a couple times where we tried to, you know, get reunited and nothing ever happened. And there wasn't even a relationship in 22 to break off. She literally told me I don't want to be with you. And after we tried to have some sort of reconciliation in 2021. So I'm like, there's just a lot of near-haves out there that are just not true. So I also have to point out here as well, Alan Rootson and his wife who else now soon to be ex-wife. Catherine have also announced that they're splitting up after 20 years of marriage.

And you got, uh, you got Aaron Rodgers here, Hall of Fame quarterback Aaron Rodgers. I might add. And of course, what's the first thing you see online from all the big towels and all the doomers and all the blackpill guys? Well, even a super pool winner. If it could, if Alan Rootson can't make it work, what chance do I have? Okay. What I want to know is this. And I asked this question on Twitter today and you guys can go and find it. It's probably, I think it's probably the third tweet down. I don't think I've done all that much today on it. But I asked this. I said, how come? I said, isn't it funny? I mean, does anybody think it's odd? Whenever a celebrity divorce happens, there's no one, but there's no women that go, well, if Catherine Richardson can't make it work, then what chance do I have? You don't, there's, I have yet so many more to point me in the right direction for that tweet, where you've got a woman who is like, you know, excuse me, a femme cell that is saying, well, if Catherine Richardson can't make it work, what chance do I,

you know, that never happens because that's not how women think. That's how black pill dooms think, but that's not how women think. So I thought that was kind of an interesting question. I'm still waiting for feedback on that one. Here we go. How about this one? We had temptations when we were married. I had people that I was a tra... It set up. This is Terry Cruz and his wife. Backed to or had crushes on or people that I felt had qualities he didn't. And I would wrestle in my own self, but I would hold myself accountable. I had women I'd pray with. I even told his mom. I was living with his mom. And I told her, I said, Trish, because I was close to her. I said, I'm attracted to the sky at church. She's like, why? I said, well, I don't know. I told her, she says, I'll pray for you, Becky. I said, thank you. And I prayed for myself. And I remember saying, crying out to God, saying, please take this feeling away from me, because... Pray the hypergamy away. I don't want to dishonor you, dishonor my marriage. I gave me my whole life. I'm trying to get all the way to the end of this with an A, you know, not known if on the report card.

So she's basically in the marriage because she's scared of going to hell. If she breaks the cover. And I woke up the following morning and the feeling was gone. Yeah. The feeling, whatever it was, if it was demonic, whether it was solish, it was gone. And when I was see this person, I wouldn't feel anything. Yes, I'm solish. I thought he was not solish. And that I would just be remiss to not say is, I hope this never happens again. We know statistically it really will. It will. I want us to have the same passion for people who don't look like Lindsay, who don't have her same access. Okay. They are cheering for a woman who committed a triple homicide of kids, a triple homicide of children. One as young as eight months old. This.

These are ghouls. Yeah. Who don't have her same access and education, her melanin, her privilege. There are women. They're worked up over the fact that black women, set a white women, are getting more sympathy and more empathy. Oh gosh, what's it up to? $1.2 million on the go go fund me right now because they're melanin. They had to have to hold to a piece of. They're sitting around this country in prisons for the same thing that we've never heard of. And I just want to remind. Look at the women in this audience. Do they look like a happy group of chicks that are just good with life? They look miserable. They have to have the pink shirts and the energy for them as well. Hmm. Again. Here for the murderous. Here for dead children. And it's three million now, apparently.

Is it three million now? Yeah. Let's give three million dollars to the parents. I guess it's supposed to go to her parents right because what you can do with it and jail. But to the parents of the murderous. And the male jurors play. I when I saw this, I mean, I expect the worst from Oprah Winfrey as it is. But holy shit. Really. What points like people go. This is fucking insane. This is absolutely fucking insane. I at what point, but we get worse though because now we know who the the holdout juror is, the hero juror. Oh, and by the way, he's black. T 10 Boston has discovered new details about the holdout juror from the Lindsey Clancy murder trial. Of course, that trial ended last week. Deadlocked. No verdict because of a lone holdout. Now, after the mistrial, our NBC 10 investigators pulled court records that were tied to that juror. And we found a 2021 charge for assaulting his wife that was later dismissed.

An active restraining order that a nephew had taken out against him. And that has still been an effect even while he sat through weeks of testimony. Doesn't matter. Not a felony. Not convicted. No criminal record. Yes, were those on his on his. Was he. Were those against. Yeah, were they out active? Sure, they in 2021. Yes, they were. But guess what? He would never serve jail time. The guy's still completely valid juror. And it doesn't make any difference because even if he wasn't, it's still a fucking mistrial. It's still a mistrial. You don't get it. Oh, well, let's disqualify him. And then now she now we're going to overturn the mistrial. No, it's not going to happen. And by the way, I also want to point out that they have docs this man. They are saying, oh, he's the black guy. There's only one black dude on the foot. That's the dude. Right. And I want to also point out that that is a federal crime, a federal offense. If this guy wants, it's a criminal offense is what it is.

Is doxing or in any way like revealing the anonymity of a juror. If the jurors want to come up and make themselves known, they can do that. But for a news agency to go and to broadcast this, that is a felony. People got into like a Twitter thread to find out whether or not there's a real yes. There are federal laws, a federal, not local, not state federal laws that prohibit that. But that's how comfortable this Rachel Maddow want to be is. And pending eviction over unpaid rent. So why does that matter to the trial? Well, before you're seated, you fill out a questionnaire. It asks whether you've been arrested, charged with a crime or served with a court order. It says right here, you're experienced with the law. An NBC tens legal analyst says that if these boxes had been checked, honestly, it's hard to see either side keeping this juror on the jury.

Okay, hard to see. Now here's the thing is, if it wouldn't have made much difference because it's still like, do you put those on there? Yeah, is it still legal for him to do that? Yes, even if he had, he could still have been chosen as a juror. So just appointing some things out here. And then the other thing is this is the thing that's getting me. And as I said three, four weeks ago, when all this shit started going down, I said the case is not going to be about Lindsey Clancy, although it should be, right? It's going to be what happens in the aftermath of all this. And fuck, I hate being right all the time. I hate being right all the time. And I will guarantee, we're not there yet. But I guarantee you they're going to make some sort of, they're going to say this guy was part of the manosphere. They're going to say that he's representative of that kind of thought anyways. I will guarantee that it will make some kind of connection there. And I was going to say the, the, the sort of liberal woke faction of the United States right now, they couldn't have asked for a better, a better trial right now because we're going into the midterm elections,

which are all going to be based on what? On men versus women. And here you go. If you don't vote for the DNC, you don't vote for the Democrats in, in on Tuesday, you're going to get more of the same. It's a fighting, here's how you fight against the, the manosphere girls vote for us. And I've been setting this thing up for at least the last well year since, well, I should say really since the, since Trump took office. But the, the fact of the matter is is that watch what happens on was it to, when is it super Tuesday, super Tuesday, it's got to be the fifth or the sixth or something like that. The day after. What? Crackets right here. This is Lindsey Clancy. Who, who are you talking about? That's, guarantee you, nobody will be telling you. I'm going to ramp up again later on. But, let me push this one in here now. Okay, I have to keep this one silent.

The wife effect. Yeah, you all want to get married now? Close his eyes. He will. He will. This is what you're signing up for gentlemen. Every time you will, like every time you read something by Brad Wilcox. Yes. Oh, yeah. Oh, better go do this. That's what mom says. Dude, remember when I always say the feminist, the feminist utopia is a police state of marriage. This kind of marriage, this is a police state right here. Even really like men, I think women just want the power over them.

Oh, my God. I think women want men to be weak. That's why women have masculine men so much because for what reason would you talk so negatively? Because they know, hear me, negatively speak on something that you say you love. Would you ever speak to your children the way women speak to men? How do women speak to men so I can use that for a reference? Miguel, say, hey, I got a turn left up here. I'm going to turn left up here. No, it's right. What GPS is left? No, it's right for sure. You never get that right, but it's fine. You're not very good at directions, but it's cool. You got it. It's exactly. It's all of these microaggressions that we make towards men. Why do we have the need and desire to correct them over everything? Because not only to take their pepper away. Because these... That's why. Lord, I think women think they want the power until they get it and they realize how heavy it is and they're not strong enough for it. And so they want the power when it's convenient, but they don't want the power when it's inconvenient. Exactly. It is what Schrodinger's feminist. You get to be a victim all the time until it's not convenient to be a victim and now you're superhero.

That's exactly what this is. I can't believe this is a very attractive black woman saying this as well. So what gets me is that I'll tell you why they want the power. Why the power is there? Because women for the last four generations have been taught that men are inherently untrustworthy. That's why. Oh, it's right. No, it's left. No, it's not right. It's left because I always get this wrong. That why is that? Why is it stupid, too? It's like one of these non-issues, right? But it's an issue because it's a... Well, what it is really. It's a frame grab is what it is. But the why are women... And there's passive aggressive on top of that. Women speak in... If there was a language of passive aggressiveness, women... Would that be women's native language? Passive aggressive. I have a whole essay built on that, too. But that's... I mean, that's really the... It's this lack of truss, it's this lack of... You want to know why women will not defer to men's authority.

That's by the way, with prime example, perfect example of men having responsibility, but no authority. Same thing with the... That's the reason why I played those two videos back-to-back, right? Same thing with the other video before the wife effect. Authority, no responsibility. Whose house is this? Is this mom? If mama ain't happy, God ain't happy. And by the way, it was a religious organization that put together that first one that didn't have any sound to it. Exactly. Oh, don't worry. Thanks for the... Yeah, I'm going to get on to the cake. Talk about cake here, man. And I think that that is a huge problem that we have, where we, as women, a lot of women, we emasculate our men left and right. Why doesn't matter if you were supposed to turn right any turns left. Why does that matter? You have to ask the women. The truth is it doesn't matter. Yes. It doesn't matter, but it does matter because women need security. They need to feel in control because they need long-term security,

and they can't get that long-term security from men because men are inherently untrustworthy. And have been so since 1965, at least that's when the social re-engineering program started. All right, I'm going to... I'm not going to... With apologies to Coral Osborne, I'm going to throw her under the bus here just briefly. Like, do not date Austin, do not date New York. Yes. What if there was like, do fuck? Yes! Oh my God. Do fuck this guy. Do fuck. Do just like some star ratings and systems. Yeah. Like, treated me with respect. Yeah. Really good at oral, dick, fantastic. Got me a car after. What's normalize one night stand? Yeah. We're all talking shit about men, but we're not okay like, keeping them up. Right. I'm not sick, 10 out of 10. God, here's what I guess is, the irony of all this and I love your Coral. You know what I do? The irony of this is if there was a man who... Oh, it's like it's having this conversation right now. Me and you have this conversation. You know what there should be, Kyle?

There ought to be a rating system. This chick's pussy is... Chef's kiss, man. If you see this chick in Las Vegas, man, and you see her down at the hippo or the rhino or sapphire or whatever, and you get a chance and she's fucking easy to... Like, just make sure you hit it. The name is X, Y, and Z. Oh, okay. Imagine... Imagine if I... Okay, YouTube, this is a theoretical, this is a bit, this is a comedy sketch, okay? Because if it's not a comedy sketch, I get to monetize. I hate my channel that's taken down. Hell, hell, even rumble might even... Might even take me down for something like that. Why is it that I lose my... If I have a job or something like that, or if I have like... If I'm not doing this, right? Or if I suggest something like that, I'm gonna lose my job. I'm gonna lose my position as a senator. I'm gonna lose my... If I'm the mayor of Las Vegas, I am no longer the mayor of Las Vegas after that conversation. And I didn't sleep with anybody.

I'm just saying, hey, this chick's pussy is fire, man. If I say that, I am dead. Dead in the water. Tick-tock, forget it. Bye. Won't even bother putting it on Tick-tock. I realize it's a bit. I realize it's funny. Hey, if you could, in some way, have some sort of rating system for chicks and say, hey, here's this app. And it's Fire Pussy.app or whatever it is. Great. But, again, it's what Mike always says is, like, women can go on Alex Cooper, women can go on sex talk, women can go wherever they want and talk. And this is okay. But we're going to a lot 20 million British pounds to the, in the UK, to fight misogyny in the school. We'll get back to that in just a moment. Let's see. Okay, here's, now that today's topic, hypergamy. I'm going to let these girls explain hypergamy to you. So it's okay to sleep with somebody. It depends if I want to date them,

like, be my boyfriend, or it's just a cute guy. Like, if it's just a cute guy that I have no interest in dating, I don't really care when it happens. But if it's a guy I do want to date, I like to wait longer. Really? So you make the cute guys, where you make the guys you want to date, wait a little bit. The guys I want to date are cute too, but like, if I... What maybe long term material? Yes. Yeah, I would rather wait, than just like, do it right away. Can you tell me what makes a guy short term versus long term material? Just other things that are going on in their life. Like, if I see him being a good husband and a good father, that's long term. And if I don't see those qualities in him, and he's just cute, that's short term. That's a fuck boy. Yeah. Do I have any questions? Any questions? Would you like me to expound upon dual mating strategy? Anybody? Don't listen to that roll, oh God, he doesn't have any back. He doesn't have a doctorate in evolutionary psychology. Neither does this bitch. But she explains it,

and you're like, oh man, these girls, man. She's for the streets. How old do you think that chick is? Probably 24 or 24. Yeah, 25, I would concur. Now, let me explain something to you. In my first book, I talk about this exchange that I had with one of my poor girls when I was working in wine and spirits. So as the art director, the event coordinator, whatever, for the brand of liquor that I was involved, or they should say the import expo company I was with, I used to have to go and get girls all time. And there's girls that I liked and you know, say, hey, I've got an event for you. Come on down. There's agencies where you can just go get, and guys too, by the way, we have guys that will pour as well. But I would have these conversations with these girls and say, asked exactly this question in 2005, 2006, somewhere around there. And if you've read my work, if you've read my book, it's called the crisis of motive. Is what it was about? Or yeah, I was talking to think it was it. It's in my first book, right?

Where I'm talking about how women will say, this guy is, this is a fuck boy, and this is husband material. This is short term, if it happens, the hot guy in the foam cannon party on Cancun on spring break, I was drunk, he was cute and one thing led to another. There's that guy. And then there's the guy who she's going to make, and it makes no sense whatsoever to the logical, deductive reasoning of guys. You would think it would be the other way around. If you found a guy who would make a really great husband and a father and everything, you would think that I want to fuck this guy right now and lock him down so I can take him home to mom and dad and then get everything started. No, it doesn't happen that way. Why? Because women make rules for betas, and they break rules for alphas. And that is the main problem that is, you want to know why is there such a divide? Why is, well, Rollo, why is there a gender gap? Why is there, you're looking at the evolutionary underpinnings

of what we call the gender gap today? Or why is there such a disconnect between men and women? It's exactly because of this dynamic, which is dual mating strategy, which is going to be the topic of today's talk today. And also, we can throw in hypergamy in there because everybody wants to, I don't know, define hypergamy for themselves. So we're going to talk about that for a little bit today. We're going to do a little bit of a remedial lesson right after I show you this last happy life. And not in a marriage to suppress what you need. The context of that phrase, that is, you don't assert yourself. You don't share your own needs. You sacrifice what's important to you. Well, it's not leading to a happy life for you if you don't have the chance to be understood, to express, to have your needs met, at least to an imbalance. When our partners feel love, they naturally want to give that back to us. They were not expressing our needs. They don't get that opportunity. So it doesn't allow for this kind of mutual growth. Mutual growth, right? Okay.

Does this guy sound like a guy who fucks or not? Does that guy sound like the fuck boy? Or does that guy sound like good at cats versus dads? Is that the good dad right there? Because I'm going to tell you right now, there's a fundamental difference between those two guys. Right? When we talk about the 80-20 rule, the 80-24-and-a-half percent rule, remember the girl I could show you to you again, if you'd like, but the girl sitting in her car talking about there's the guys who are never going to get laid no matter what, no chick wants to have no chick wants them. Those are the 80 percenters. And then there's the guys who are the, you know, if he has a good job, if he makes me laugh, if there's some sort of tangible value added benefits to me being associated with him, do I really want to have sex with them all that much? No, no, yeah, whatever. And then there's the guys who are the Justin Waller, Alan Rissens, assume to be Alan Rissens. And the Jason Momoa's the guys who are going to get laid in spite of themselves. Those are exactly what that chick is talking about.

Why do you not want me to use the term long term partner? You see, stop using the term partner. I'm not, did I say partner? Oh, I don't think I said partner. Did I say partner? If I said partner, then I owe you a dollar. Okay, so once again, hello, welcome to the rational mail. Welcome to the rational mail 101. Today's going to be a little bit remedial, I think, for a lot of people, I hope. Every now and then, I kind of got to get back into the meeting potatoes podcast. Because this is a podcast, not a podcast. And one of the things that I have been sort of keeping my eyes on has been the idea that hypergamy is not what I think it is. And those red pill guys and those manas for your guys don't know what the fuck they're talking about. Okay, now I'm going to show you, I'm going, you asked for the bull, you're going to get the horns. I'm going to take you to the wood shed today. And throughout what I'm going to do today, I would hope that everybody's going to get some sort of benefit from what I'm going to do. Okay, sometimes you have to spank the children

so that they learn something. And that's what we're going to do today. Because we need to get into what's the difference between like hypergamy and what do a mating strategy is. Because I'm starting to see people sort of get lost in semantics. They're getting lost in the literalism. They're getting in the autism for sure. Right? Because everybody wants to say that hypergamy doesn't mean what you mean. Oh, well, okay, enlighten me. Please enlighten me. I've been doing this for a quarter century. You'll tell me what you think hypergamy is. Well, you don't use the term properly. Okay. What's proper? Well, it means marrying up. Shut the fuck up, Jesus. Do you know how many times I have dealt with this kind of I've had this conversation. How many different ways I have explained this for 25? We were talking about this in 2005 on the SoSweil forms. That's how old this shit is. She probably even before that. Probably like 2002. I'd have to go and start tracking it. But the fact of the matter is,

I think a lot of people get lost in the SoSweil. When they want to find anything, I'm sorry, I mean, you use bird hands. They want to find anything to pick out that you guys are not experts in this. You don't have the DR in front of you. You're not Dr. Rollo Tomassi. So you don't know what you're talking about. Well, I've been doing this for quite some time. I have a keen interest in it. I've been writing six books. I've been like, do I need to explain my pedigree? Certainly not to this classroom setting. The fact of the matter is we've had this conversation. And we've also had the, you don't use this terminology correctly. So much so that I've actually written chapters of it in books to try to explain the misconceptions about hypergamy. So we're going to get into some of those today. But they're right. You're 100% right. If we just go and use the term hypergamy, then yes. Hypergamy actually was coined. And I want to say it was in the 1920s or 1960s. There have been two separate studies, but there was a sociologist that was examining the caste system in India.

And I mean, I could look it up on perplexity for you and give you this great history lesson in the term hypergamy. But it doesn't matter because word meanings change over time. Because human beings are human beings. And you know what? We get to change the meanings of words occasionally. Go look at urban dictionary. Tell me how many of those were, he's funny. How many words from urban dictionary find their way into the actual dictionary? Do you know the word ain't is actually a word? You can find it. It's now in the dictionary. I remember when I was growing up, people said, ain't is it a word? No, it's a contraction. Is not or not whatever ain't. But it ain't no difference. See, the thing is, it's like, it's like, let languages fluid. So can we add definition? Can we add definition? Can we add more to the meaning of hypergamy? I think you can. In fact, we've done so very effectively over the course of the last, oh, I don't know, almost 60 years when it comes to the word respect. Respect used to be something that was, something that was merited.

Something that you would respect somebody for. But there was a merit to it. There was performance based. What makes Kyle respectable? Getting rid of that echo. That's what makes him respectable. Getting rid of that echo. That's what makes him respectable. On the fly is what makes him respectable. There's a lot of things I find respectable about a lot of other guys. But it's based on what their performance is. So when we start talking about respect, when it deals with women, people wouldn't say, well, you don't respect women. We got to teach our boys in the UK to respect women. Okay, fine. Here we go. I'm going to show you, since we're off on the tangent of respect here, here we go. Being boys to respect girls isn't work. It's just common decency. And teaching them about... No, it is not common decency. That's one definition of the word respect that has been added during the time of... Certainly has been emphasized.

Over the course of, say, the last 60 years, since we decided that we were going to... Convert into a gynecentric social order, because women tend to create societies in the round. And everybody deserves respect. If you're part of the country, unless you're a white male, everybody deserves respect. Everybody, but here's a little respect for you and you and you and you. It's the same idea as wealth redistribution. It's the same idea of communitarianism, which is where women... It's baked into women's evolutionary firm where, because women are the vulnerable sex. They seek out safety. It makes sense, right? They seek out safety in numbers. So, if it's about the collective, and it's about this sort of communitarian, it takes a village to raise a child, it makes sense that respect is somebody that... Or something that everybody should get. Not in male societies, not in male hierarchies. Male hierarchies are determined by performance, by merit, ideally. I'm not saying they always are perfect about that clearly.

But in concept, men create societies, they organize societies based on hierarchies. What is that hierarchy based upon? Ideally, it's based upon performance. Now, people will say it's a dominant hierarchy. Yeah, dominance is part of performance, for sure. But it doesn't mean that if we're talking about who's the best computer coder... Right, it's not a dominant hierarchy, but the performance hierarchy is most definitely there. So, it kind of depends on the context of what we're respecting someone for in the first place. But that respect is based on performance. So, what form of respect are we teaching our boys in the UK, Mr. Isestarmor? Is it woke either? It's the law. The real heroes here are our mums and our dads and our teachers and principals like Michael Blake. The bad guys are people like the take brothers. We want to spew out all this poison that's affecting our kids and the tech companies who profit from it and who are supercharging all of it.

Now, to give you just... So, there's some sort of evil plot or evil collusion between the teats and YouTube and rumble and Instagram. And all of the platforms that they were banned off of August of 2022. Yes, there's some sort of collusion going on right here. Well, at least until the midterm elections are over. An idea about what this looks like in practice. These two individuals have run an online course that they've got the hide to call a PhD. And in this course, they teach young men how to sexually exploit young women online. Now, the idea that it's our teachers or it's our schools or it's our curriculum that is to blame for sending kids towards all of this is... Yeah, my bad, this is Australia. One of the most extraordinary things that I've ever, ever heard. But that's what happened last week.

That's what the leader of the National Party argued. Now, the truth is it is not our schools that are to blame. If you want evidence of that, look at this. The other day, a female journalist pretended on TikTok to be a 17-year-old boy. Okay, we talked about this already from last week. It's that same blonde that I was referring to last week. Understand that this dynamic is now filtering into political discourse now. Okay, it's not just the chick who pretended to be a 17-year-old boy. Now, here's the thing is they're using that study, that fucked up methodology. Everything that she remembered, she used examples of Pearl, who was the other... Oh, sorry, what's her name? Lauren Ponds. I love you. Lauren's a friend of mine as well. Welcome to the manosphere. Every example she used was a female.

And this just flies over their head. They have no earthly idea what they're talking about. But I wanted to get back to the fact that in every one of these conversations, they want to say, well, we need to make sure our boys respect women. Okay, what form of respect are we talking about? The performance-based one or the common, worthless, valueless one, that everybody deserves respect. Because when you are making respect into something that for men means performance and for women is common and everybody gets unmerited, now you've got a real problem. Because women are all the way at the top of that hierarchy or should be theoretically, all the way at the top of that hierarchy, above the highest performing guy, because they have tits in a vagina. That's the only reason. Now, what are we going to use a common definition of this term? The same thing applies to hypochemy. Can we change the nature of that word? I think yes, but apparently the autistic spurgs on Twitter and on Instagram

and everybody who wants to make a living off of the anti-manosphere right now and want to drag my name into it and drag Sarthane's name into it. And God knows anybody else's name into it. I'm here for it because I got the fucking receipts to back this shit up. But I can tell you right now, in some cases, it's not even worth doing it. Even Pearl right now is getting exhausted. And I don't have any love for Pearl, as you guys all know, but I can see the exasperation. I asked the same thing of mine last May when we were when he kicked every woman off of the pan. He frank castled all the girls so that really I think he wanted to do this anyways. So you have me and Mike on there. And the first thing I asked him, he checked the video. The first thing I asked him was, aren't you getting tired of the shit? And I'll ask him again, he comes out to Vegas and say, aren't you getting a little bit of... Isn't this kind of like monotonous? Yes, it is. And I think Pearl is at that stage right now. It's like it took him a while to get there, more so than other people.

But it's the point of diminishing returns. And it's not about the conversation. It's about the same thing and knowing what to expect and having, well, certainly women. But that mindset, being endlessly predictable. In fact, again, I've been doing this for like 25 years, you're predictable. I already know what you're going to say. So if we're going to focus on hypergamy and say, well, it's only about marrying up, right? It's only about that study that was done on the Indian caste system by that one sociologist, that one time, who said that there's a tendency for women in the lower cast to want to marry into the upper caste. That was the very first acknowledgement, I think, really of really what we would call hypergamy today. But no, we can't go beyond that. We can't say it's something else. We can't possibly say, well, maybe it's not just socioeconomics. Maybe it's they want to fuck Alan Richardson. Maybe it's they want to fuck the hot guy in the foam cannon party. Maybe it doesn't just exclusively mean that it's all about socioeconomics.

It's about lifestyle. It's about, I don't know, caste systems in India, right? It's about marrying up socioeconomically. Because we've already put that bullshit to rest when I, and God knows whoever else, killed off the idea of mate switching hypothesis. Sorry, Dr. Bus, that was a dead meme, and it is a dead hypothesis, and still is to this day. No one is talking about mate switching hypothesis. Everybody wanted to have something to say about it, including Steve Stewart Williams, who was on Chris Williams, and show recently talking about, well, I don't know if I really believe in the mate switching or the, I mean, the dual mating strategy, whatever, and I'm looking at Mack and Murphy, Mack's like, because Mack has done those studies. Mack knows. That's one of the reasons why I kind of got, I have a new respect for Mack, and I kind of like him a whole lot better now after that. Because Mack was there just keeping it real the whole time. Rob Henderson's there just like, like an eel in the weeds. And you got Steve Stewart Williams, who has, or has not been, he's not an influencer.

He's a writer. He's very good at what he does. No disrespect from whatsoever, but he's not an influencer. And you got Mack and Murphy there gone, mate switching hypothesis is pretty much bullshit. He's not going to say that. Not in those words, but he's already come to the conclusion that dual mating strategy is a far more robust theory of, of a sexual strategy or mating strategy, certainly the mate switching hypothesis is. We can, we can disprove mate switching hypothesis just by looking at like celebrities like Steve Harvey, right? Or, or hell, we can even go and look at like what you got, Aaron Rogers, and is, and is, I need to go fuck this guy before I marry you. Why? I'm a hall of fame fucking quarterback. You want to know why people like men and black pilled dooms and migtows, and I guess to a lesser extent, MRAs, whatever, that sort of like that mindset always says if he can't make it work, what chance do I have?

The reason why they say that is because it's dual mating strategy. It is not mate switching hypothesis. That's the disconnect. The disconnect is this. Well, if I make all this money and I make myself a high value man and I get a, I have a really good job, I come from a good family, I, I, I, I, I stay in shape somewhat right, whatever he's Aaron Rogers, right? So he said shape, right? If I, if I do all these things that everybody tells me makes me a high value man, the chick who wants to be my fiance still wants to go fuck her ex or fuck that guy before she, I need to get it out of my system. But buy. I mean, that's what you should say, obviously, but the fact is it's not the, it's not the details of Aaron Rogers and his, his now X, fiance, it's the fact that she's comfortable in saying, I need to go fuck this guy before I marry you. You won't have a problem with that, right? Because she thinks that that's the way it ought to be. They're oblivious to it. Every chick that was in the Oprah audience, every chick who's, yay, kill your children, kill, kill the eight month old with a rep of a elastic band or at it and kill the kid.

Those chicks cheering that on think it's okay. They think it's all right. What's the big deal? They're in heaven now. That's where they belong. Remember the Chaplin, the female Chaplin. Oh, it's okay. They're in a better place now. They're in heaven right now. And you know, they're not looking down on you in a judgment. What the fuck? Why is there a female Chaplin in the first place? How does that work out? How does that happen? Especially in the prisons says, how does that happen? Okay, so what I'm making here is like, they're oblivious to it. The same dynamic, the same mentality, the same psychology that prompts, remotivates Aaron Rodgers' ex-Fiancé to say, I'm going to fuck this guy first. I let you be okay before I marry you, right? Uh-huh. No, no, it's not bitch. And that's Aaron Rodgers just made a practical. That's just a tactical decision.

You're just a population. Yeah. Okay. And he's the bad guy. He's the bad guy for having said, no, for having said, by Felicia, get the fuck out, man. Like that's that was the problem. He's a problem because he's not cool with that. And I'm the problem. You're the problem. Anybody who else has a problem with a triple homicide of children, you're the problem. Not us. The kids are in heaven. It's okay. Get the fuck out of here. I'm going to change the definition. I'm going to change the definition of hypergamy. I'm going to change the, I'm going to point this shit out as long as I live, man. I am going to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable, man. That is my fucking mission statement. Because these chicks are too comfortable, man, too so comfortable. They're cheering a black woman talking about basically excusing a triple homicide on Oprah, Oprah, where the fuck?

Like, does it not, and I'm asking this because I'm dumbfounded. I'm thinking of this in an empirical rational, very male way of thinking, deductive reasoning. There I go again, applying deductive reasoning over the emotional state of women. How dare you? The fact of the matter is, it's, they're oblivious to it. We're at a point I'm stealing some lines from Aaron Clarke, sorry, Aaron, but they're oblivious to it. Absolutely oblivious to it. So oblivious that it's okay for this chick to tell Aaron Roger, she's going to go fuck someone else. So oblivious that they will cheer for a murderous. What else are they going to cheer for? What's that line in a, what's it in a Rick and Morty? It's like, your, your booze mean nothing to me. I've seen what you cheer for. That the thing is what you cheer for. You know, you're not going to hurt me. You're going to call me an out. You're a misogynist. Yeah, I'm happy to be one. If the opposite means cheering for a triple fucking homicide, get out of here. Go fuck yourself, man. I'm going to choose a live children over dead children every single time and I'm not going to cheer about it. And I don't think I'm wrong about this whole fucking thing. Okay. All right. Let's, okay. I was going to sew. So, I'm going to go back to the

high program. You think is there, if you want to stay with a strict definition of high program, meaning just marrying up. First of all, I think you're autistic and you're a literalist. But I get it. Okay. Okay. What if we use this term? What if I said, okay, women are not naturally high programists, although I would be lying, but women are naturally high programists. It is something that is running in the sort of the background as a subroutine that's running in their sort of cognitive background all the time. Very much, very not unlike men when we see a hot chick, we can assess within the first like half a second. This chick is, I would fuck this chick. I wish she passed the boner test or not. Right. Is she somebody that I could, I could sleep with or I couldn't immediately. I have a really tough time in the gym. Everybody else though, like anywhere else, I'm pretty accurate. All right. But the thing is, is we have, that's natural to us for women. It's would, what's the old joke? The old joke is like, well, woman knows within the first five minutes of meeting you whether she's going to sleep with you. I know she can't fuck you or not. I disagree. A woman knows in the first five minutes of meeting you whether she won't sleep with you or not.

Is there are like anything else any little, any any any other wiggle room in there. Then you've got that's where game comes in. That's where affluence comes in. It looks money, muscle game. Right. That's where all of the, that's where all the interplay happens. But if that's never there in the first place, it doesn't matter what, it doesn't matter how rich you are. It doesn't matter how good looking you are. Whatever if she says that I would never fuck this guy. Okay. Well, at least you're doing us both the favor and I don't not wasting my time and you're not wasting your time anymore either. But that's not how, let's see, that's the, the difference between dual mating strategy and really what hypergamy and the most literalist sense is now hypergamy is part of dual mating strategy. Okay. I would say they're interchangeable, but people want to take me to task on that and I'm happy to, to tell you why you're wrong. But maybe I'm using the wrong term. Maybe we should start referring to women's mating strategy not so much as hypergamy, but as dual mating strategy. Okay. Maybe that makes a little bit more sense because dual mating strategy is alpha fucks and beta blocks.

It is long term security interests versus short term genetic benefits. I'm not, again, not me not making this up as I go along this is the definition of dual mating strategy. Okay. The problem is is that everybody doesn't like to talk about dual mating strategy because it's unflattering to female nature. If I say, if I say women want to fuck the hot guy in the phone cannon party, but they also want to marry the good dad. Women will admit this on the street of riding a brickle in front of moxies from guy on the street guy. Well, like how long does it take? Like what's the average of you sleeping with a guy? Well, there's the hot guy the fuck boys. I'll fuck that night. Same night. Unless he seems to me like he's still cute. He still looks good, but he looks like more like he's first of all, he's probably got money, right? Or he's got something else going for him that gives her dad vibes that gives her long term security. I'm going to take this guy home to mom as opposed to I'm going to take this guy back to my apartment and fuck him right now. Both of those are female nature.

The only one we focus on though, if you're Scott Galloway or Arthur Brooks or any of the other any any other name any other evolution of psychology, including David bus. Name any other psycho, a evil site guy any other influencer who has had ever talked about any of this stuff and they will only fixate on the beta bucks provisioning protection and parental investment. The good stuff, the stuff that makes sense, the stuff that's supposed to keep you, you know, the nuclear families together. We're while ignoring the chick in front of moxie saying, then there's the guy that's hot that I would fuck that night. And again, I'm not making the I know it sounds like me making a judgment call. I can't speak about this, especially as a man, I can't speak about this without sounding like, oh, he's better. Oh, he's complaining about it. Oh, he has a who hurt you. I, without the emotional reframe because people are going to see this will end up being a clip. People will end up seeing this clip and they will say, oh, there must be something or he must have got burned really bad for what for talking about the obvious for stating what I'm observing in human nature and human behavior.

Just because you take this to the bank, gentlemen, here's a here's a proverb, right, proverb of rollo, okay. You cannot speak about women's nature, especially if it's unflattering you as a man, you cannot speak about women's nature without it sounding like a complaint without it sounding like hate without it sounding like bitterness. You cannot observe a phenomenon that has something to do with female nature without it sounding like it's like complaining, whining. I am not whining. I am giving you an analysis here. All I have to do, would you like me to just simply sit back and not say jack shit and post that put that video up there and let the girls tell what I would say. Anyway, so the girls aren't complaining. No, they're revealing what their sexual strategy is. Take that to the bank, act accordingly. You want to know why people get pissed off at the red pill or the or the manosphere is because we present something like this where you can see in broad daylight or a downtown.

It's a little bit of a trickle right where the chick is there explaining something that the manosphere has been talking about since my case 2002. We've been talking about it for almost a quarter century if not all about a quarter century right now here it is confirmed I even said I had this conversation as far back as 2007 when I was in the wine and spirits industry exactly the same words almost verbatim from what from the poor girls that I would have it my own. When we have these conversations and found its way into one of my books right I'm complaining if I tell it like it is but if the bitch on fucking in front of moxies out on brickle says the exact same thing then we're like oh my gosh what's wrong with the girls today oh my gosh I like she's not complaining she's not whining about it she's not going to get ratio she's not going to get canceled for bringing that stuff up in fact the guy holding the mic is not going to get canceled for because of the child. What does that tell you about the quote unquote media that the Australian PM whatever is complaining he's complaining about what does that tell you about our political systems are the way we're organizing society right now where it's I'm complaining if I say but she's not when she says it.

So it's a effective way of silencing your ideological you know opponents it's much better if like think about how effective that is as a social convention man if you can get your opponents to say oh I better not say that because if I do they're going to be repercussions for that I'm going to get it's a complaint it's whatever the fuck it is it's not you want to know why certain you want to know why certain studies. So they say there's a second term of success replicate. And now they don't Because, because if they do they don't get funded anymore right I was just talking about the replication crisis I think it was a Rob Henderson on his sub-stag was talking about this about two weeks ago you know I don't一樣 the replication crisis in psychology or low.? in the hard sciences, by the way. It's not really so much a crisis, blah, blah, blah, no. No, Rob, it fucking really is, because if you look at the influx of women into the, you know, probably in the hard sciences,

but certainly it's off sciences. If you look at the influx of women into getting doctorates in psych, call every field of psychology right now. Imagine, first of all, you're never gonna have research, another reason why I got respect for Mac and Murphy. You're never gonna have research done that is in any way, he even has the chance, even smells like it might have something unflattering to express or to reveal about female nature. You wanna know why we don't talk about dual mating strategy, it's exactly that reason. That's why mate switching hypothesis sounded like something that had some sort of merit. When Dr. David Bus talks about it, David Bus was wrong. Sometimes the big guys are fucking wrong. Now, of course, we don't wanna talk. You know, as nobody ever says anything, I was talking about mate switching hypothesis as far back as the last two or three years ago. I wrote a very, sorry, lengthy piece on it. It's on my sub-stack and it's also on my blog. It's also on the Racheon Mel blog.

Mate switching hypothesis is a cope. It's a cope because they don't want to talk about the real shit. They don't want to talk about the possibility that it might be alpha-fuxen made of bucks. They don't wanna talk about the possibility that dual mating strategy also includes women wanting to fuck. We just heard Coral and the blonde chick from sex talk, forget her name, saying, we should have a registry of guys who lay down the good dick. Women want to fuck. There is that side of their nature. Sorry, not fucking sorry. In fact, the only thing that gets me is the hesitancy or the delay or just the unwillingness to even mention that. So we don't talk about dual mating strategy. We would rather talk about what is it's a sort of mating. That's the new, that by the way, that's the new cope for for mate switching hypothesis. Well, you know, likes get with likes and it's always based on marriage. It's never, you know, like, that's not a,

here's the thing. If you're hypothesis about human mating strategies, like, why do people like to fuck? Well, who do they like to fuck? Why do they like to fuck those people? How do they get, how do people get to be that good so that they can fuck, right? If that, if your end results, if you're, let's say positive rather than null result, is they got married. They still had to get to the point where they got married, okay? They were, they still paired off it, whatever you want to call it, a pair bond or monogamous relationships. I'm going to talk about that a little bit later here too and it comes to a monogamy versus, I hate to say polygamy, because it's not really polygamy. It's promiscuity versus monogamy is really what it comes down to. But, but the fact of the matter is, is that there is an un, there's this, and it's just this stubborn unwillingness to talk about. As far as I know, myself and maybe Mac and Murphy are the only people who I've heard utter dual mating strategy in a very long time.

So, is, is hypergamy dual mating strategy? Well, from, if you're just going to stay with the definition of marrying up, then that would be definitely on the provisioning protection and parental investment side of it, right? Because if we can keep it locked in, if we can keep hypergamy locked into just being about marriage, then that sounds more flattering to women than saying, yeah, but they also fuck up as well as marry up. They want to fuck the best guy they can get. Because that, first of all, there's two reasons why that's unpopular. First, it makes women look like sluts, all right? Okay, well, your slut shaming goes, so all women don't like that, but fine. But women still like to fuck so much so that they want to make a registry. Sorry, Pearl, actually, maybe I should be lifting you up on this one, because that was really helpful. Why, why are we avoiding the visceral nature of women? Well, those are just damage, we're going to qualify. Those are just damage women. Remember we talked about, like, and Mike actually

completely debunked this. Talking about, like, oh, well, when Steve Stewart Williams and Mack and Murphy and Rob Henderson and Chris Williams, and we're all on that round table, they're one of the misinformation. Here we go, data laundering by Rob Henderson. Was that, well, we find research shows that, there's most sex happens in marriages or most sex happens between couples and blah, blah, blah. Statistically, I'm sure that's true. But then the guys who are having the most sex are having sex with these women who are highly promiscuous, damaged women, because only damaged women would want to actually, I don't know, create a sex registry, something like that. Only damaged women who would be okay with fucking this guy, who fucks other chicks, that's the only explanation. When, in fact, statistically speaking, it's not just those women, it's also the women who are getting married. Because the numbers don't account. Like there's too many women that would disqualify

just it being, for it just being that one small subsection. I can always say, promiscuous women get with the most promiscuous men, right? Permiscuous guys get with women who are very promiscuous, as well as any other chick that is somewhat, ready to fuck the hot guy in the foam cannon party. Like Mike has done the statistics on that and Mike has written the numbers on that. The fact of the matter is, it's this ugly truth that it takes guys like me, or takes guys like Mike Sartane to sort of come, break the numbers down, go into perplexity, go into whatever's, look up the stats for it, because these guys are unwilling to do that. Well, why are they unwilling? They're unwilling because they know that if they start talking about dual mating strategy and they have to talk about the alpha fuck side of it, that that's gonna make them very unpopular with women. That's gonna, in fact, they won't even get to that point. That's one thing in my biggest criticism of Steve Stewart Williams' new book, a billion different, a billion years of sex differences, is he writes this book, it is brilliant, and the statistics, everything else is fantastic in it,

but it is so fucking apologetic. Well, there's a difference, there's lots of differences between men and women, but they really don't matter all that much. Then why are you writing the fucking book? Like, what, who cares? If you're gonna backpedal on the boldness of a title that is a billion years of sex differences, they're better be, they're better be a punchline at the end of it, man. They're better be something good going. Instead, it's this, we gotta find some sort of ballast and we can't really talk about, well, you know, women fucking, unless they really, you know, but they're really into monogamy and they're really into provisioning protection and parental investment. And everything will be just fine. Don't worry, you bait a 80% or losers, you're still at everybody. There's someone for everybody, right? There's this hopeful bullshit that comes along with that. And I'm not saying you can't get out of that 80%, you can, but the fact of the matter still remains is like, these are the dynamics and they can be kind of ugly. Hypergamy can get very fucking ugly. Hell, even Aaron Rodger, just ask Aaron Rodger,

Hypergamy can get fucking ugly. But nobody wants to, so what do we do? We make Aaron the bad guy. Why do we make him the bad guy? Because we don't want to talk about women's visceral nature or we're gonna say that his, now X-Fiancé was damaged. Only damaged women would ever attempt something like that. I would never do that. Bitch, please. It by order of degree. And maybe that woman who says, I would never do that. She's 35 years old now, but when she was 25, she probably would have done the same fucking thing or probably has done the same fucking thing. But the very fact that we would defend her and vilify him for leaving that situation, like, yeah, if it makes sense to me, right? The fact that that would be an issue in the first place is really what fucks things up. Because now we're having this conversation now, it's just, and by having that conversation, this is why you don't have debates with feminists, Pearl. You're not speaking the same language. You don't have the same goals for the debate.

To win is something, for you to win the debate is something different from what she's there to win. Your goal is not her goal. Your language is not her language. It's kind of pointless. I learned that on fresh and fit, man. You get to that point of diminishing returns, again, which is usually two white claws. When you get to the point where the girls have had two white claws, that's when, okay, it looks like the point of diminishing returns is coming in. Then you get to the point of negative returns and that's when you go, fuck it, I'm out. And then they go, oh, you range quit. And I'm that's, and you can guarantee, I guess, congratulations. The feminist one, because that was her goal. Her goal was to get you to be so exasperated just so, like, you're not seeing any, you're not, you don't speak the language of empiricism or reason. So, like, why are we even having this conversation? All right, let me jump on these super chats real quick before I move on. Saw the collab with Kate Willett, yes. Okay, so announcement time, I did an interview

with Kate Willett, I hope I'm saying her name, Willett. K-A-I-T, spicy. And it was a very good interview, although I feel like I was, I got, I did this myself, I set the camera too close to me. But it was a pretty good interview. By the way, anybody, because everybody in the Manusfer talks, we all know each other. So, I'll just say this right now for people who are watching. Guys, if you're in the Manusfer and you're gonna do an interview with Kate, come correct. Now, she does everything in good faith, I'm not saying that she was a fantastic interviewer, I like her, I would do it again. I think she's, and the show was good, I got nothing but positive feedback from it in her comments of all places too. People really liked the conversation, and I think I was on point, I did really well on that. But Kate will fact check you. And so, as she should, because Mike does the same thing, but in fact half of Mike's reaction videos are because, he's just, all he's doing is like,

whip it, beat your ass in the wood, with all these facts that he pulls from like perplexity. But she does this, and that's fine. In fact, I would encourage more people to do that. And she fact checked me, and I'm happy to say that I passed with flying colors on all of them. There was only one that was just slightly questionable, and that was the UK spending what, 20 million British pounds on the UK school system, so that little kids won't, well, they won't become little misogynists, right? They mentioned Andrew Tate by name in several of the videos that I linked not only on my Twitter, but on, she posted this on her Twitter, so I linked it on hers as well. But I went back through my tweets at that time, when the UK was announcing that they had a lot of 20 million British pounds to the school system, to do misogyny training for the kids, as well as the teachers. We also see this play out in Australia and in Canada as well.

So we're showing this, and then of course, she fact checks it, and I'm correct, but it's not all just taxpayer dollars, some of it came from private individuals or something like that. Fact remains, 20 million dollars going into the UK school system, and for what? So that little boys don't stab 13-year-old girls, because everybody watched Adolescence, and they heard the name Andrew Tate. This is going to be a non-issue very soon, because Tate's in jail, and he's not getting out of jail. I think this is it. I think finally they're going to put him away. And if they don't put him away, he's going to definitely be off of social media for a long time. It won't be the household name that he is right now. So you're going to have to find somebody. You're not going to have him to beat around anymore. You're going to have to find some other boogie man after all this. So that was one, then, oh, then the great one. And I know this one by heart, because I'm the one that introduced this, and nobody wants to give me my flowers. The Morgan Stanley rise of the She economy forecast.

From, I believe, OK, I said 2018, and it was really, I think, 2018, 2019 is what I came up. OK, it was one year off, sorry. And then the reason why I know about this is because I was doing shows with Pat Campbell when that article dropped. That was this topic of one of the shows I did with Pat Campbell back in the day. And I mentioned this. I said, look, that study has been tossed around. We are in 2026 that came out in 2019. So you're looking at seven years of that article, being sort of prophetic, right? It's this prophecy that we're all going to wait until 2030 to see. But in that forecast, that financial forecast here, financially forecasting for the 20s, 2020 onto 2030. And one of the forecasts that they made was that by 2030 women, but to prime working age women between the ages of 25 and 44 would be single.

Now, I mentioned this, and I stayed, and I said, look, too many people are saying, single and childless over and over and over. At Pearl, I point out, I'll lay this at the feet of Pearl because she says the same thing. Everybody else sort of takes it and runs with it and say, single and childless, no, it's not single and childless. There's nothing mentioned about children in that article, whatsoever. And I made a point of saying that on Kate Willett's show because I'm sick to death of hearing people sort of misquote that. Now, does that mean that those single women will have children or not? No, they'll just be single. They could be single mothers. They could be, maybe it's in vitro. Maybe they are single mothers, but they never, remember, single means not married. OK, they could have been married, but they were divorced, right? But it's single, meaning that by 2030, prime working age, prime working age women will be single. They, why does they, why do they care? Because those women have money. They have the money to buy a house, they'll buy a car, whatever, how to spend it, right?

Are they, they're going to be an economic driver in the next decade is what they're basically saying, right? That's all that really comes down to you, but people took that and they're either too happy or they're too pissed off because they say, women are going to be cat ladies and they're going to be spinsters and they're going to be single and childless, right? That was my whole point and all that. Kate fact, check me on that as she should. And the only thing I got wrong was I said it was 43%, not 45% because for the life of me, I thought it was 43, but sorry, I was off two points. But everything else checked out. So if you're going on Kate Willett and I levered to death, I thought it was a grab. I would do it again. In fact, I look forward to doing another one with Kate. But good show, go check it out. I don't think it's more than an hour. It's on Kate Willis. Kate, AIT, W-I-L-E-T-T, Willett, you can find them. Maybe Sammy can go dig that up. All right, yeah, thank you for the collab. The collab was good, I liked it. We got here, gifted one, the rational male members, hey cool, gotta remember, hey, you get a member? Sure, there you go, why not?

You can have them. D'on the monk, go, monk, go. Big bad, uncle, big bad roller on Sunday, happy week. First NFL knockoff, oh man, the Raiders are playing today too. Yeah, Raiders. I ran to get the ass. Miss Trial has Normie, man, even saying they've done, they're done with modern women, crazy. They're not done. Guys are still gonna fuck chicks, okay? It's like, I'm giving up women entirely. We're just hearing the loud ones. Yes, trust me. Women, men and women are just fine. They're still gonna fuck, they're just, everything's fine. But women are crazy, like chicks, like that, a craze. To some, like by order of degree, there's a little bit of crazy in there. We're just fucking them in a different light now. Yeah, well that's the thing is like, I'm wondering, like, and this kind of goes back to the general question is like, have women always been like this and we're just more aware of it because we have social media? Or is it because women are just fucking nuts and something has, like, something in the water? So, and I don't, I think we have essentially

created conditions where women can tell Aaron Rogers, I want to fuck what's guy before you're married and it should be okay, everybody will agree with me, right? No, but are women, maybe women have always been like that. They just haven't had the opportunity to use the social conditions so that they can actually be oblivious to their own bullshit, right? So, and then of course, but she's damaged. So it's like what, like almost 20 years to really seize the effect of social media? I think so. When we get, I'm gonna get into effect, that's a good segue for the hypercomy thing I was talking about. Yeah, I think a lot of it has to do where hyper aware of it for sure. Where hyper aware of men's nature and women's nature more. And I would argue that we've always been this fucked up. We just haven't had it 24-7 with a cell phone all the time. We haven't had a, basically we're wearing body cams at all times, you know. You hear stories, but you wouldn't see that such a mascot. Yeah, I mean, and then you would have to, like, because people always wanna tell me,

well, Rollo, the Bible is the first red pill book in New Human Nature, blah, blah, blah. Maybe you're right. Maybe, maybe the, okay, maybe the, the half of them all, right? Maybe from ancient Norse, right? It's basically Proverbs for Vikings, right? Maybe they were pretty smart. There's a lot of good stuff in the half of them all too, right? But maybe it's because they understood women's nature. They saw this and they're like, we better write this shit down. Because here's what I'm seeing right here. That was the first internet writing the shit down. Proverbs, Psalms, whatever it was. Right, bitches be crazy. Oh yeah. Bitches be crazy in Norway. Oh yeah. Bitches be crazy in China. Bitches be crazy in Egypt. Bitches be crazy in Japan. Well, bitches be crazy in Japan. Watch how full-hole. Yeah, maybe that was, but it was just like not as pronounced because we didn't have a 24-7. And we didn't have a new, I can't remember, like I was watching, what was it on?

I think it was on prime and it was like, this is some really good, I don't know if they're history channel, but they're on Amazon Prime, there's some really good documentaries that are series documentaries. And they'll go over World War II or World War War or something like that. And they have one that is on Vietnam. And the one thing you have to learn about Vietnam from the jump before you even do anything is it's the first one that is a first war that we had that was on TV. It was the first one that was in your living room and you're eating dinner and you're watching Walter Cronkite and stuff like that. And that wasn't even a 24 hour new cycle because there was no CNN in the 60s and 70s. Now think of it as this is like, it's on Twitter within a minute of it happening. Yeah, look at the Ukraine war. Exactly, exactly. Yeah, you can see drone footage of guys dying from the perspective of the drone that just killed the motherfucker, right? So, have we always been this fucked up? Probably.

We're just better and more efficient at it and we're more aware of it. Have women always been this fucked up? Probably, but we're more, they're more efficient at it and we're more aware of it, right? So what do we do with that? Well, act accordingly. Leverage that to your best advantage. Like if you think the best practice is to say, you know what, fuck the, and I said this myself, say, fucking no. No, because at what point do you say, well, if it's not a triple homicide then is it a quadruple homicide? Would you say this is the industrial revolution of hypergaming? I would say that it is, like we are far, we're hyper aware of, dual mating strategy hypergaming. We're hyper aware of it. It's not really efficient at it. And we've been getting, yeah, we've been getting better at it since I'd say the mid-2000s because with the rise of the seduction communities, I mean, the pickup artists were the first ones to actually use it and leverage it. And I really think people like, I know people are gonna hate on me for this and I'll just say it anyways. I think guys like Mystery,

even Owen Cook, even from RSD, a lot of these guys who are the early front runners, they didn't, they're trying to get laid, okay? But they were the pioneers of revealing women's nature. It was like, I think it was Nick Krauser, pickup artist, Nick Krauser, he's retired now, but pickup artist, Nick Krauser, I've quoted this in a couple of my books. He was saying that the last 15 years of pickup artists, pickup artistry, whatever you wanna call it, pickup, has done more for social psychology and understanding the nature of men and women and everything, then the past 150 years of formal psychology because those guys can go out in the field and do what would otherwise be unethical behavior on the part of the psychologist or the researcher and everything. So what they're really essentially what, for better or worse, they weren't, I'm not saying they intentionally did this, but the early PUA community and the seduction community, what were they doing? They were gathering data and bringing it back to the collective and they had a database of,

okay, well you know that they'll do this when we do this and maybe if we start talking about Chick Krak and women seem to like superstition and power crystals and to row cards and all that shit, that was just one aspect of it. But then you get into more details and that's why I became so fascinated with it because I was studying psychology at the same time all this shit was going down. And they go, hey, that relates to what this guy in the behaviorism set or this is David Buses thing. And I was making these sort of, it was like having, you know, like in the board where they're trying to catch the killer and they had like a thread going from picture to picture and stuff like that's all, that was basically just me, back in 2005 to like 2014 on SoSwab, we were just making, we're connecting the dots. Hell, I even say connecting the dots in the books. And that's all we really did. And then from there we took in, we sort of developed it into what it is today. But people don't see that. They just think mystery was just this goof with black nail polish and a feather bow on a top hat and everything else.

Who would ever want to fuck this guy? Well, a lot of checks apparently. I never thought that anybody would want to fuck like Owen Cook. Oh my God. Until you see him in action, man, because I'm like, he looks like a ginger Santa Claus, right? If you look like no, like just based on his appearance, no woman wants to fuck, I love you. I love you, Owen. No woman wants to fuck him. Until I saw him at Resort World pulling girls, like random and unsolicited, don't know these girls from anyone, right? Pulling girls off of dudes. Off of the, like, you can be ready to fight, right? Yeah, and I'm like, I didn't understand it until I saw it live in real time. I was like, what he does work, definitely. Anyways, let's see. Roller, what's the best way to handle a very blue pill father? And most family members, since I'm a kid, I always, since I was a kid, I always resist this nonsense to be serviceable

and make myself small, especially for a woman. Well, the red pill, as I've said in the past, and it supplies to your family as well as anybody else, is red pill game, whatever, is like triage. You could save the ones you can, and then you read last rites to the dying. I don't know how far gone your dad is. How do you go about doing that? Well, the same thing applies to your dad as your best friend, as your brother, as anybody else that you care for, and you don't want them to get rolled. You don't want them to marry a chick that's going to ruin their lives. The interesting is, is if you tell a guy, hey, man, you're on heroin, dude, we will need to get you off of that and get you into rehab. I care about you enough, so you don't ruin your life with heroin, right? Or smoking, you smoke too much, dude. I don't want you to get COPD when you die. I don't want you to get emphysemo, right? You're a fucking hero when you do that. But if I go, dude, that chick is gonna fucking ruin your life. I've seen this shit happen. I know what's going on. I know you can't, because you're involved in, you got this love thing going on

in emotional connection, and I don't want to see, I can't step in and actually tell you divorce this bitch or whatever. But I'm an asshole. No, bro, you're pointing that out. I'm gonna ask, yeah, exactly. So that's the way I look at it anyways, is like if I care about another dude, I care about them enough to go. You might want to watch out for this one. Hey, I'm seeing the signs here, right? At the very, if you have to be diplomatic, then do it. But if not, if your dad say, dad, you're fucking up. I know she's hot, I know you eat them big titties, but just, you just like back up for a little bit and like see the force for the trees. The other thing is this, a lot of people resist the red pill, and I mean that in terms of intersectional dynamics, not ideology, because they think that to agree with anything I would say, or you would say, right? Because you're sort of a red pill aware, is to agree with Andru,

to agree with misogyny, it's to agree with the manusphere. And by the way, that's by design now. But men don't want to be associated with that because they think that if they are associated with that, they're not gonna get any pussy. If I say that, if I say, hey, you know what, a man should be a man or woman should be a woman. Like most guys won't say it, even just mild shit, right? They simply won't say those things because to do so, disqualifies them from getting pussy from any chick that's an earshot. God forbid you say it on social media, right? But the fact of the matter is if you get that guy in private, or he's going through some shit, he's going through some sort of crisis or something like that, and you say, hey, look, maybe it's not my place to say this, but I'm gonna say it anyways, maybe now's the time to sort of reassess your, what you think about men or women. If that guy is at a point where he's ready to hear that, then yeah, that might be a good time to say so. If they're not, then here's the other thing that I always do. This is the Socratic Method. Ask questions. Why do you, hey, hey, Kyle,

I know you don't like the manistro or any of that kind of shit here, but what do you think about this Aaron Rogers and his fiance? She said she wanted to fuck some guy before. Why do you think she would do that? Like if I asked that question, if I'm asking this quite a amount of time, this is rhetorical, right? But if I ask that question to you, then you're gonna have an opinion, well, maybe she's crazy, you start the conversation, right? So you find it's a current event, or maybe it's something in your family, maybe it's like, oh man, I can't believe so and so is getting divorced. Why would that, there were so perfect together. Why do you think that she initiated the divorce? Why do you think women initiate 75% of the divorce? Have that conversation, that conversation starts and then you can go and pick that out from there. That's what I call leading the witness, right? It's Socratic Method. You ask questions to lead the person to your point of view, right? Is it always successful? No, but it's not confrontational. It's like, you better do what I tell you. You're gonna live a fucked up life.

You're gonna be, you better get Red Pill right now, or women are gonna roll you for the rest of that. That's never gonna work. Especially for your dad, especially for somebody who's sort of died in the wool blue pill. You gotta ask questions. Start conversations. And it's a lot of power, right? Play a sucker to catch a sucker, you know? So it's like, I don't know why Aaron, why do you think it's such a big deal that this chick would say she wanted to fuck some other guy before she married Aaron Rogers? It's like, I know, but I'm gonna play an idiot and let you tell me what you think, because you're smarter than me, all right? That's the way I would go about it. It seems sneaky, but it's really not. I mean, you could be direct, but your directness only gets you so far. Why is the alpha side of high programy so hard for blue pill men to wrap their heads around? Again, because it's not in their best interest to do that, because if they stay and say, oh, women are pro, you know, they're pragmatic, they're prudent, they make good choices, they're just better human beings,

whatever, if you have, I'm not saying you say those words exactly, but I'm saying that those things are sort of the attitude that you have. It's not in your best interests to say, well, women like to fuck guys, right? It's okay if I do, because that's what I built this brand on, right? It's just being brutally honest about shit. At the, sometimes at the point of my, you know, like offending my friends, which I actually did this week. But the, the fact is, is like, the reason why they can't is because they're not incentivized to do any other thing. They don't wrap their heads around it, because if they did wrap their heads around it, they'd be afraid that they would say some, say the wrong thing and they wouldn't get any pussy. That's the thing I get to mean is like, when you're talking about, what I was talking about masculine dominance last week, the fear most guys have of actually assuming or owning that dominance or like leaning into it, even in just the most marginal, fractional way, they're afraid they're not gonna get laid. If I do that, she won't fuck me, rollo.

He should probably try it. Just give it a shot. There's one time, see what happens. Right, have the balls to like, because the thing is, is the guy that has the balls to do that is exemplifying out the behavior, whether he knows it or he doesn't, right? Is it always gonna be out? Of course, you don't go, hey bitch, dog Martin Dick, I'm dominant now. Like that, you don't do that. But like the attitude, the confidence, I hate using that word, but it's a good is confidence, but because confidence sounds better than dominance. What's confidence? I want dominant and what I do, so I'm confident in what I fucking do, right? Cause I've done this a long time. I'm confident that I can, you know, there's a lot of things guys can be confident, right? But the dominant attitude, the mask, I'm specifically referring to the masculine dominance that women crave, that every chick in that audience of Oprah needs the high hard one.

They need if they need a dude that's gonna tell them, no, listen, like, are you even fucking listening to yourself? I would, Oprah needs me to go on there and say, bitch please, what the fuck is wrong with you? Three kids are dead. That's the end of the story. There's no show after that. He's just turned the cameras off. The three kids are dead. That's it. Just keep it blank like this. Move. That's it. Yeah, show over. And it like the sopranos. And it like the sopranos. Yes, that's it. That's it. Simple as that. You're wrong. I'm gonna tell you why you're wrong. You're wrong because you have this amount. You want to know why women are wrong. And I would, you know, that meme where that's that one guy, this is a whole big giant crowd of people like, yes, you're all fucking wrong. That's me, right? Okay, here's the thing. There's why you're all fucking wrong because you're taking the women have this emotional connection with the fact that she killed her kids, but they're postpartum this and all this other shit.

And I'm gonna tell you this right now. That whole bullshit about, oh well, you're a man. So you don't have a say in this because you don't have a uterus and you don't have postpartum, do you? You don't know what it's like. You can't be empathetic about any of this stuff. And you know what, your goddamn right, which is exactly why I'm the one that's gonna tell you no because I can think clearly, I can see past this emotional hysteria and that's what it is, fucking hysteria, psychotic hysteria, the kids are dead. They don't wanna hear that. It's empiricism versus emotionalism and that emotionalism is what is preventing all of these women from understanding the gravity of that situation because what do they do when women speak the language of emotionalism, it's all about themselves. It's all about how I feel that this is like this. It's just feels before reals, feels preempt everything including three dead children.

Emotionalism is here, three dead children are right here and one of them eight months old, as fixated with the realistic band. I'm gonna keep saying that over and over again because I know it makes you feel bad. Ladies, I know that whenever somebody says elastic bands, eight month old child, it leaves a really bad taste in your mouth. Good, it should leave a bad taste in your mouth. It's emotionalism versus empiricism. I speak the language of empiricism and I'm gonna keep speaking it and I don't care if it leaves a bad taste in your mouth because that's the only way we can affect change. That's the only way you're gonna learn. Yes, I can't relate with you on your emotional appeals for postpartum psychosis. Thank fucking God, I can't. Thank you, Lord, thank you, God, that I cannot relate with that because if I could, I would be just as whacked as you. I would be good, good kids on Oprah. That would be me if I was a case. Thank you, I'm glad. Yes, so you don't have a uterus, you know what I'm saying?

Yeah, that doesn't disqualify me from the conversation. In fact, anything that qualifies me and disqualifies you because I'm having an empirical discussion. I'm the one who has the goal of establishing that the kids are fucking dead. Nothing after that. Nothing, it doesn't make me feel good. Good, it shouldn't make you feel good. Kids are dead, end of story. In fact, that feeling of, oh, it doesn't make me feel good. That should be what you use to punish this bitch. To put, like, she can't kill her because she's massachusetts. But to put her away for life, that should be your incentive to put her away for life. Imagine this, imagine that they're your kids. And Lindsey Clancy comes over to your place, kills your three kids. She's not making the... jumps out the window and your three kids are dead. Well, she had postpartum depression. Oh, she had postpartum psychosis, whatever it is. Do you forgive her from killing your kids? Now, I wanna know because if she kills her own kids, does that make it somehow morally more less reprehensible

than if she snuck into your house, killed them in the same way, jumped out the window, cut herself with a blunt knife, whatever the fuck it was, right? That took sleeping pills and now she's a paraplegic, right? Does that make it more acceptable? That she did that to your children? That's not even, that's not a fantasy. That's murder, that's murder one because she killed three. Murdered, the first kid, you could say, man, it's not her, she was crazy. Two, that's murder one. Three, but that's like, what is it, what is the, there's a, I don't know what the actual definition is of like mass murder or like, you know what I have, like a shooting incident, if you kill like more, I think it's more than three or four people it is registered as a mass murder. I'm wondering if it qualifies as mass murder. How many people have to die? Mass murder typically involves the killing of three or more people. She is a mass murderer.

Mass murderer. And no cooling off period. No cooling off period. She did not rest. In a single incident and location and no cooling off period, guess what ladies, you are defending a qualified mass murderist. Murder. Gare, there you go. Does that hit any different? No. Okay, let's see, they just say hypergamy and high school, yes. Oh, thank you. What's the next one here? People always assume malice when faced with uncomfortable truths about female nature. Yeah, malice or stupidity, ridiculousness is another one. Blame. That's another one I hear all the time. Like if you make just the most like measured, just monotone, like, you know, innocuous, I'm trying to think of all the words I can think of for it. Observation. A female nature and that female nature kind of makes, puts them in a bad light.

And you're a man, you're complaining, you're blaming, you have issues, you have an emotional issue, who hurt you then it's emotional reframe. Have you ever been in love before? Do you know any real women? Remember that? That's a strong one. Yes. What was your family situation like? Do you like animals? You know? But it's a, there's a sort of like hierarchy of like, okay, so first of all, the easiest one is, is you're complaining. Where? Men complaining about, men have had so easy. That's who made the system. I'm just observing that. Aaron Rodgers fiance, that you wanted to fuck this guy. Only a misogynist, only an in-sell would say, then it's shaming is, I should say, shaming is also on there too. Only an in-sell would make that observation. But is it true? Does that just qualify her from actually being fucked up with Aaron Rodgers, who I actually kind of like? Oh. Are many men perque Rodgers?

What do you got to do them like? I love it. So one of what I would love, like people keep saying, ask, we're all, how do we fight back? You don't use their language. You use the language of empiricism versus emotionalism. Because really what are those? So somebody says, you're complaining, complaining means, at least it infers emotion. You have a problem, you have an emotional problem with this, don't you? That's why you're complaining about it. No, I'm just telling you that women do X. No, no, no, you're only, when men do that, that means that they are complaining about it and they have a problem with it. Well, you couldn't get laid in high school. That's the next thing, right? Or it's blame. Why do men always blame women? You're blame, blame, blame, blame, blame. And by the way, it's not women who say that. It's guys. Because it's intracexual competition for guys. Guys will go, well, I hate these manosphere guys because they're always blaming women. No, we're not. I'm just making an observation here, pointing it out to people. And people, as far as I'm concerned, they could draw their own conclusions, right? I hope they would.

But you can't tell people information without telling them how to feel about it, right? So when I say something that sounds like it's unflattering to a female nature, guys will be like, why do you feel like you have to blame women for your own feelings? It's like, that is absolutely nothing to do with it. Like I just said, but you took that and extrapolated it into. He had the only reason people say these things is because they have a problem with those things. No, I'm pointing this out. Maybe you do, maybe you don't. Maybe some do, maybe some don't. But it doesn't take away from the fact that this is an empirical deductive observation of female nature. Or male nature. Of course, nobody has a problem with male nature. If I say, you know, guys are horny all the time and they just want to fuck anything on two legs. Yeah, cool. Of course. Of course. We needed a study for that. We're spending money in colleges to understand what it's common sense. Everybody knows that, right? It's never, like a woman says this, then I go, who are you?

Who are you? It's like, why are you complaining about men being dogs? Why are you complaining about men like, because they have higher libido than you? Like, who are you? Do you love your mother? No one, he says those things. It was like the same thing like when Alan Richardson, like I said, when he was breaking up with Kat, like, no woman goes, well, if Kat, you know, Katherine Richardson can't make it work, then what, what, what chance do I have? And no, women don't say that because they know. They got a lot of chance. They don't care. They're like, oh, Alan Richardson, oh my gosh, he's, you know, you thought they were so perfect. No woman asks those questions, only Mig-Towell. Mig-Towell, only Blackpill doomers, whatever, despondent. For lack of a better term in cells, like they, are the guys that are saying that. That what they're saying is, I don't want to get married and here's another justification for me, not getting married, which I wasn't going to anyways because I'm anti-marriage. And really, I'm not really attractive enough

to get anybody to marry me, but here's some more affirmation and some more confirmation of why I look like I'm doing the right thing because if Alan couldn't do it, well, then fuck it, you know, I guess I'm on the right path. It's just affirmation is what it is. But women don't need that affirmation because they don't care. Do you think Kate is not going to be well paid after the divorce? I think she's going to get a lot of money from Alan. Oh, yes. Yeah, there's always, everybody assumes malice, you're right. Women view men as either the father alpha or the sibling friend beta, yes. According to Sigmund Freud, Dr. Warren Farrell, this is the reason their works and volumes were banned from the mainstream education. Yes, I would, okay, Warren Farrell, I think I don't necessarily think Warren Farrell's stuff has been all that has really been banned. I actually, it's funny because Warren Farrell, Dr. Warren Farrell was one of my early inspirations when he wrote, why men are the way they are. Still at the top of my reading list, by the way.

So if you want to know what's on Rolo's reading list, why men are the way they are? Written in 1986, 87, I think, by Dr. Warren Farrell. And a very, very good book. I still have mine. And would you like to know the story behind this? I will tell you the story. I was with my BPD girlfriend at the time when I read this. It wasn't the 90s actually, so it'd have been like early 90s. And oddly enough, yeah, why men are the way they are. 86, see, I was right. I don't know. Published in 86, yeah, got it. Really good book. And because it's not just about why men are the way they are, it's like why women react to why men are the way they are. It was really, I don't want to say it's the first red pill book. It really wasn't, but it was the first book where I read that anybody was any man, of course, was relating observational and regular, just for the time studies that they had in the 80s, about the nature of women.

And so the reason why I even came across the book is because my stepmother, I don't know, my stepmother was like a diagonal feminist, right? And she had this book because she was like, she was belonged to Mensa. And she had this book because it was a book that they were reading in their book group, that she was a cos of Mensa people have book groups, because I don't know, it's Ellie. But she had this book and she even wrote the liner notes in it, and had highlights and stuff in it too. And I still have the book. It still has all the shit in there too. It's interesting fascinating to me that she was very much a feminist, but she was writing these things inside in the notes and stuff. And from what I gathered, she couldn't really argue against the whole out of the shit that he was saying. And it really, it stuck with me, and that's why I still have the book. I kept the book, right? And she was glad to give it to me because she hated it. It went against everything that she was sort of raised to believe in a feminist kind of way. But I just ate it up.

I've read it probably three times already. And it's dated material now, because like I said, it was in 86, but the principles are still kind of proto-red pill. They're kind of like red pill in the larval stage. Before there was Tom Liches, which everybody criticized me, yes, Tom. Okay, everybody about Tom Liches, Tom Liches, Tom Liches, old Shalom Alekum. Patrice O'Neil, before that, there was Warren Farrell in 1986. That's far back, I understand. But remember, I was in like 20s, actually, when I read it. I wasn't 1986 when I read it. It was like when I was 24, I think. But anyways, yeah, good book. Can you explain one more time for us, slow kids in the class? Wait a minute. Hey there. A slow kids in the class. Okay, why hypergamy is so embarrassing for women that they do everything in their power to pretend that it doesn't exist? Well, that is a very good question, my friend.

Okay, so we're still going to take hypergamy from the perspective of the definition is AlphaFux Beta Bucks. It's dual mating strategy. It is short-term genetic benefits, short-term sexual versus long-term security. That's really what AlphaFux Beta Bucks, and people hate that. AlphaFux Beta Bucks. AlphaC BetaNeed, right? They fuck the guy. He's the Hawkeye in the foam cannon party. He won't commit. He's not a good dad, but boy, he was fun to fuck. Don't believe me? Then don't listen to me. Listen to Cheryl Sandberg. Go read Lean In. Read her quote on her recommendations to young women when it comes to romance. It exists exactly. It confirms hypergamy to the letter. Go out and fuck the wild boys. The bad for you boys. The rock band drummer. Go fuck the drummer. Go have fun. Don't marry those guys because the things that make them sexy are exactly the same things that make them not a good choice for a husband. Husband.

And then when you get to that point, like in your 30s, I choose. Sounds a whole lot like Rollo's epiphany phase. Then you settle down with the guy who's the good choice, the good dad, right? She's basically saying AlphaFux Beta Bucks. When you're 18 to 28, fuck those guys. Have fun. Get with the guys who are bad for you. But then don't marry those guys. You marry the guy when you're 30 who's a good choice. It's Cads versus Dad's. I didn't say this. This is Cheryl Sandberg in Lean In into 2013, right? That's her quote. That's her quote. You don't have an eye. Roll don't listen to those manosphere guys. Okay, listen to Cheryl Sandberg in Lean In. It's the same fucking message. It's exactly the same thing that I'm saying. The reason why women have always kept it quiet, and this kind of comes back to our point call, is we're more aware of it now. You want to know why women hate the body count question? It's because they can't get away from it. They have a digital footprint now.

So even, like, oh, I want to get married when I'm 30, but I don't want all my porn erased. What is it? It was a Riley Reid, whatever fucking name it was. It was a Riley Reid, one of the, a lot of roads. I want all of my porn to be erased. I want all of my past, you know, life erased. Why? So I can get with a guy who'd be a good dad, so I can have a baby. So my mom can have grandchildren, right? But I can't do that, or can't do that as effectively. I can't do that with the guy I want to. It can be the father of my child. I can't do that with a guy who's a high-value guy. There's all this, my vast catalog porn for the last, you know, 20s plus years of me just going, apesh it and tripled penetration with, you know, I can't have that floating around. Well, that's the extreme illustration of that. Now you just take the average girl who's got Instagram and maybe she did only fans, maybe she didn't. But she's got, you know, party pictures and stuff like that. And just by order of degree, she doesn't want to talk about body count because she's afraid,

maybe rightly so, but she's concerned that her digital footprint will follow her. So much so that she's worried that the guy that she might want to have a relationship with might find that a little bit discer, you know, disconcerting, right? You might not be on board with that. Now the laughable part of it is, is like, most guys don't give a flying fuck, right? Most guys don't care about body count. It's the guy, you know who cares about body count? Guys on the street, podcasters. You know who cares about body count as the guys are with a microphone on the street down and free mat down here. They care about it. But women will get really irate. And why? Because they know they can't get away from it. It's the same thing with hypergamy. I've written two essays on this. One is called open hypergamy and then the other one is open cuckoldry, which is the follow-up to it because that's the end result of open hypergamy. But hypergamy has been around since human beings have been walking on two legs, right? For women, hypergamy, as I keep saying, it's a biological function.

And I'm glad you brought this up because it sort of segues nicely into the video that I want to get into here in a second. But hypergamy is this, it's an evolutionary effect. And it has to be. And again, there's nothing bad or nothing good about hypergamy. It just is what it is. In fact, if anything, it's good because what it does is it keeps women looking for the best of the best. And so therefore, theoretically speaking, anyways, they're mating up so that the human race can be mated up. Now, of course, all that falls apart after hormonal birth control and social media and sort of amateur porn and it's various forms. But the biological evolutionary function of hypergamy has been around for forever. Now, if you don't want to call it hypergamy, then dual mating strategy has been around forever. Like AlphaFuck's beta bucks. Women don't like that and have tried desperately to keep it secret for a long time. Like I want to go fuck this guy, the hot guy.

But he's never going to be a good long-term prospect. So I need to go bang. I want to fuck Chad, but I really want Brad to be the father of my children. I want him to, you know, he's the one I take home to mom and dad, right? He would be a good father. Now ideally, they want the balance between those two. People will say, okay, I've talked to a choral Osborne about this. It's a Madonna whore complex, but it's the female version of the hot Madonna whore complex. They want a guy who's the hot guy who's fun to fuck, who is just this great sexual experience, but he's also leader of industry. He makes a shit ton of money. He takes care of her and the offspring. She doesn't have to worry about long-term security whatsoever, provisioning protection, parental investment. He's already good at that and he lays down the good dick. That's the ideal situation. The guy who is what women call the complete package. That guy doesn't exist. At least not now. He might have existed in probably better ability to exist in the past than now, but even

then, because what happens is, as women are not, first of all, that guy's not believable. People say, oh, he's the good guy. He's not the bad guy. He's not the, the, the simp or the, the beta. He's not an alpha or beta. He's the good guy. He's somewhere in between. That's a nice idealization, but it simply doesn't exist. And even if it did exist, he doesn't exist at the right time for that chick. So if the chick is 23 years old, she doesn't want the good guy then. She wants to have, she wants to fuck the guy in the phone cannon party in Cancun. She's not looking for a long term because that seems, in the back of the head, somewhere in the lizard brain. That seems like a waste of resources. It seems like a waste of potential. I've got 18 to 28 to really, to, to, to, to just take the world by the balls, right? The world is my oyster. My ring gains is called this, you know, women are born with a million bucks. When did they get it at 18? How they spend that is between 18 and 28. It's their sexual capital. Like some women get 10 million dollars. Some women get one million dollars, but they have to find some way to either invest that

sexual capital or they waste it and they blow it all by the time they get to 29. And now they're toothless in the trailer park in Reno somewhere. So what do they do is, is there, there's this incentive to, to make a good investment, but not too early because they don't know that the guy that they meet at 23 who's hot and fun to fuck. They don't know that there's not going to be, is he really the best? I can do, he's not going to commit. He's, he's really not a good father. But boy, does he lay down the good dick? He's not the, and then they get to the guy who's like 28, 29, 30, whatever. He's not fun. He's not a rollercoaster. He's not like, you know, he's not spontaneous. He's not fuck me like the guy did when I was in college. But he's a good dad and he's, he's on point and he goes to church and he loves his mom and he likes puppy dogs and rainbows and, and all this other shit. But he's really good. But then like there, I've, this is me spitballing. When a woman gets to be about 28, 29, there is a conversation she has with herself.

She has her ego and her id. If you understand anything about Freudian, you know, there's the ego, super ego in the id, right? All we need to worry about is the id and the ego in this, in this case, because the id is like, fuck it, I want to fuck all these guys. I want to go fuck and have fun in the, like it's the hedonistic part. It's the, I want to go fuck the Brazilian helicopter pilot, you know, can't couldn't spring break blah, blah, blah. Then there's the ego that says, well, you know, id, we're not getting any younger. We've got to find a guy pretty soon, because mom wants grandchildren and we can't do this indefinitely, because you know, there's a new crop of 23 year olds coming in, you know, every year. And we got to think about our future and we got to at least, you know, maybe we can make some compromises here and the id goes, no, no, no, I want to fuck hot guys. And then the ego says, well, how about this guy? He's not as hot and fun as that guy, but he's still good looking and he has got good prospects. And maybe we can, you know, with the time, we'll find him more sexy and attractive. And the id's like, okay, okay. And so then there's that compromise that happens right around 29, the time when women are

most likely to get married, right, 28, 29, 30 somewhere in there. And then she has another conversation once she's a 31, 32, which is, is he really the best I can do? Did I fuck up? It's a constant doubt, right? And that's when guys are really put on a put in the dilemma, right? Because the guy who thought he had done everything right is now being second guest by that woman's internal, internal conflict really, but that internal conversation about is he the best that I can do? He's not as fun as the guy I used to. Oh, man, I really wish I could go back to fucking that guy. Oh, he was so much fun. Remember when we were in college, ego? Boy, that was a lot of fun. Da, da, da, da. Then of course, what happens is social media and popular culture play to that. That's how you get movies like eat, pray, love, divorce porn for lack of a better term. What is it? How still I got her groove back, right? Go to Jamaica, divorce your husband, go to Jamaica and find some dick swing and native to come and rock your world, girl. You want to do it before you're 40 and ugly.

You know, what about the kids? That's okay. You're more important than the kids. Lindsay Clancy. Yeah. Killed a party. You're more, you're, you're happiness is all that matters, girl. Fomo, you won't, or Yolo, you only live once, fear missing out too. You only live also, factor in. So hypergamy, you, have put this back up, hypergamy used to be something that was kept secret because they didn't want, they certainly didn't want the guy who was the beta bucks provider to know that she was pining for the hot kind of foam cannon party. So you have to keep that secret. You know what I mean? When we talk about gold diggers, oh, she's a gold digger. All women are opportunistic. All of them. Every last one. Hypergamy predisposes women to opportunism. Again, nothing wrong with that. It's just by order of degree, how egregious is it, right? The thing is, is women don't want men to know that their concept of love is based on opportunism because men's concept of love is based on idealism.

Love should matter for the sake of love. That's guys. Yes, I, I just, I want to be able to provide and, you know, they want to do, you guys want to have a purpose, they want to do stuff, but they also want to be rewarded for that. They want some appreciation for that. Be able to, I perform up to this level and I want a chick who's going to fuck me like a porn star, right? I do my best. You do your best. Right. Well, when that's not forthcoming, there's something that's in between there. That's because women's sense of opportunism comes in when it comes to her making an emotional investment in a guy. Women's love is circumstantial. It is based on what that guy has to offer. Women will not make an emotional investment in a guy that doesn't meet certain criteria. That is the basis of opportunism. And I don't mean that. I know it sounds like people, there's connotations to the word opportunism that sounds like, oh, she's a mercenary. Oh, she's, you know, take it, grab it and go, you know, kind of thing, or she has no loyalties or whatever like that. It doesn't have to be that way. I'm using opportunism because it's the only word that actually really serves.

But, but there's a fundamental difference. Like love is a gendered concept. Respect is a debt-agendored concept. There's a lot of gendered concepts. A lot of people don't really understand. You want to know why, like, what otherwise loving couples, why they split up is because they come to the realization that women have an opportunistic concept of love and men have an idealistic concept of love. And they can't reconcile those two. You want to know why I have a 30-year marriage. It's really great. I understand that. I understand that I approach love from an idealistic perspective. My wife says, show me the fucking money. Show me what you can do. I perform, perform, perform. And I'm good at what I do. And I don't have a problem with that because I understand what her concept of love is. People will go, well, that's not real love, roll-oh. Well, guess what? You're living in the 21st century right now, and that's what it's based on. Show up or don't show. It's up here or disappears what it is. And I hate it when I have to listen. I do think that love matters. Don't get me wrong. But I think the emotional investment definitely is my wife and an emotional investment in

me. Absolutely. But we didn't get to that point if I wasn't doing certain things. I didn't qualify to be that guy. And that's just the way it fucking works. I'm not saying it's right. I'm not saying it's wrong. Just saying it's a different concept for men than it is for women. Well, that sounds really fucked up in mercenary. Yeah, it does in the beginning until you get into it, tell you have a 30-year shared history. And then it's based on love, for sure. But you had to get to that point. It's like, here's the thing that gets me as this is, is people like women hate this when I bring this up. I will say, well, that Mike has done this too, but I'm going to take credit for this one. I'll go, well, you know, women don't make an emotional investment in guy until that guy meets certain criteria. Sometimes that criteria is he's just got to be six foot tall, you know, 12-inch clock, and he has to be, you know, jacked in a V-taper and everything out. That might be the criteria. It could be as simple as that. But it could also probably be a lot more than that.

Women have the laundry list of prerequisites for a guy that they want long term. So, I remember that when I love it when chicks tell me, well, you know, I need to be real mass, I need this, I need that, blah, blah. But those kinds of things don't happen until there's a certain degree of attraction. There has to be some sort of arousal that comes along with that. The thing that bugs me the most, especially about Scott Gallo, he constantly, and Arthur Brooks, by the way, they're basically, are they like twins? Are they like, they look a lot like each other, right? They sound a lot like each other too. I think Arthur Brooks is like Scott Gallo, a two-point-out. But, you know, they say, oh, you know, women select for kindness and intelligence and humor. I'm like, yeah. Once you get past the big dick and tall and the physical aspects, once you've actually attracted them and then she decides maybe she wants to be with you long term, that's what me and Mike have been saying forever.

But if you just listened to Arthur Brooks or you listened to Scott Gallo, I'm going to show you a show of these videos. If you just listened to what they say, you would think, you're a guy, you would think, okay, the path to pussy is to be kind and to be intelligent and to, you know, be the best version of myself as I can and to listen to her problems and it's not about the nail and on all this other shit. And that's the path to pussy. It doesn't matter what it looks like. I just have to be kind and intelligent and sweet and, you know, accessible and listen to her and be emotionally available on all this other shit. Like, yeah, that works. You're 100% right and a long term woman select for and a long term partner, the dad guy, not the alpha fucks guy, the dad guy, the beta book provider, definitely, definitely looking for that guy because he's much more easily manipulable kindness and all this other stuff. Still, you know, agreeableness, conscientiousness. I'm trying to think of the big five personalities, right? That guy is going to be much easier to get along with and to get him to do what you want

him to do than the guy who's this sort of narcissistic Machovelian psychopathic guy that she really wanted to fuck back when she was 23. But it seems to me that the characteristics of a guy who would be a good dad are way different than those dudes. And we're correct in that because there's studies show that women want to fuck guys who have narcissistic personalities. But they don't want to marry the person or per se, don't want to marry those guys. In fact, those are the guys they try to change into the guy that they would want to marry. And so kindness and intelligence and all this other shit that goes along with that, the other side of hypergamy and all the things that sound really good and it sound like it gets to the bedrock of Western society. We need more guys who are kind and intelligent and respectful and all this other shit. It's like, yeah, but women don't want to fuck those guys. They're still fucking the bad boy. They're fucking Jacob. That's what they're doing. They're fucking Jacob. The homeless guy has been placed in the van. There's fucking that guy. They love that guy. They want to fucking even more, but they don't want to marry that guy. They don't want to have that guy as the, as the, as going off into the future with that

guy. Of course, later on, they're like, gosh, I really wish I could go fuck that drummer again. But after a while, you have that investment. Opportunism has already been met like all that other shit. That's like what it was at a pookies to say. The most surest way to make a woman miserable is to give her everything she wants. She's your board. Why do women act out? Why do women cheat? Well, they're bored. They want the rollercoaster. If you're not giving them the rollercoaster, that's why I say masculine dominance. Tell her no. Well, for no reason. Yes. Tell her no fucking that for the fact that you just said no. You stir the shit, man. I just figured it would be slapping around a little bit. Now, like, like, take a chance, man. Be the, like, women need indignation. And if you are not the one giving her indignation, she will happily manufacture it herself, or she will find it from someone else. You know, indignation is a drug for women. You might as well be the drug dealer. If you're married to her, if you decided to tell death to his partner, this is for you

and me, forever, baby, you better be her drug dealer. Because someone else will be her drug dealer. I'll tell you right now, if you become her indignation drug dealer, man, you're going to have a fucking great man. It will never be boring. She will not be bored. Trust me on that one. Let's see. Here we go. People can't accept the truth about female nature because ego investments, sunk cost fallacy, virtue signaling, ideological capture, and purity propaganda. Yeah, I like that one. Purity propaganda is a couple of lists. All hail the God Emperor. How are you feeling, I'm feeling dynamic today? Feeling like I could beat Horace in hand to hand combat. Does it take a toll on you acting as a sheep dog for a herd of zeroed out men in your support group? Why would you say that as a sheep dog? I'm not a sheep dog.

I think of myself as a teacher for sure. Why would that be a sheep dog? That's an interesting choice of words, right? So in my support group, my support group is called re-ignite. And now's as good a time as any to actually read this pitch that I got for you. But I don't look at it in those terms. I don't look at like that. I don't think my guys look at it like that either. I'm one of the most accessible dudes in the world. Here's an idea. Why don't you come to an event? Why don't you come to the next babes in Toilet and why don't you come to the next? I love it when people say, well, Roller, you got these men and you're charging them X amount of dollars. I have a $50 a month crypto course according to Scott Galloway. Come to an event. Don't come to my mind. Go to M.O.A. M.O.A. I think he's got immersive every month now, at least once a month, I'm pretty sure. Don't believe me. Go come to my event. Come to Mike's event.

I brought this up. Thank you for this actually because I brought this up with Kate Willett. I was at, oh, and then also here another announcement that I did not make. What are we at two hours? Yeah, that's good. So I went on on Wednesday. I went on a show that I had no idea what I was. I had no earthly idea what I was getting myself into, but I had this guy, Sean Stack hit me up. Sean Stack runs a media corporation that has worked with National Geographic History Channel, Discovery Channel, HBO, and Amazon Prime. I did not know that until I got there. I just thought it was another podcast, but he said, hey, we really want you on this show. It's going to be talking about the manosphere and masculinity issues and I was like, what am I doing? And they said, okay, but we want you to come to the studio because we need you live in studio for it. And I'm like, I did. They told me it was a panel show, but I didn't know who the other panelists were going

to be. And I was going to go on with this guy. He's a comedian and his name is Trey Crouter. And he actually is a pretty cool dude. Now a lot of people, okay, Trey Crouter is also known as the liberal redneck. He kind of, he's kind of, he's kind of, he's kind of Jeff Foxworthy, but he does liberal kind of comedy, right? And okay, you know, he's good. He's all right, but it's, you know, not my, not my wheelhouse really, but still good, but he's hosting the show. And I thought it was going to be his podcast. It wasn't. It was, it's, he's the show. He's the show host, but it's another show. And I don't know if it's a pilot or something like that, but I was on there. I was also across. It was two other guys that were with me. The other dude that was sitting across from me is a gentleman, gentleman, gentleman, sorry, his name is Buck Angel. Okay, who actually I think is a pretty cool guy. Now if you know anything about Buck Angel, Buck Angel is a transgender man, okay? The opposite way, the other way.

But if you see Buck Angel today, and I did, and he was sitting across from me, you would not be able to, you would not be able to tell that he isn't a little old man who is, I'm going to say six, in his 60s maybe, he's probably about five foot six and had a baseball cap on. He kind of looks like something out of duct, I'm not saying it. But I saw, and he was absolutely cool dude, speaks like a dude, has a beard like a guy, but apparently born or some reconfigured like female parts, right? So he is technically biologically a woman, but he lives his life as a man, right? And he's talking about that, and he, by the way, he does not believe whatsoever in like kids transgender, re-assignment surgeries, or in fact, he's very outspoken against that stuff, which is funny because he's almost very, he's not kind of conservative. And then the guy who's sitting next to me, whose name escapes me right now, but he was another comedian, and he was, he's got about six foot, one, six foot two, and kind of,

outspoken kind of guy. He was also comedian, and I don't remember his name, I wish I could remember it off the top of my head. And then there's Trey, who was a sitting candy corner to me, and it was a really great show. It was an absolutely fantastic show, and I got to say a lot of stuff, I talked about re-ignite, I talked about some other stuff as well, but the reason why I got into the topic of re-ignite was because a lot of people are thinking that, you know, the atmosphere is just a bunch of guys that are on the take, right? But they're like, well, you got this $5,000 a month kind of program blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Well, that's not my program, and I explain that I work with guys who are the demographic, the unsexy demographic, the people that the men that everybody ignores, right? These are guys who are 40, 40 to 65, somewhere in there. I mean, if I include Kiyosaki, it's 77, but there was the guys that like nobody thinks about, nobody cares, because they get zeroed out in a bad divorce, and they don't know how to

rebuild themselves. And like I said, it's either delete themselves or remake themselves, and I try to help them remake themselves. These guys were like looking at me like, oh my God, I didn't even know there was anything like that. I'm going, yeah, that's part of the man's fear, congratulations. Or Mike when he's doing MLA. We've been doing, like I've been doing re-ignite for two, almost two and a half years now, Mike's been doing his for God knows how long, and guys legitimately benefit from what we do. So let's filter checkles out of their bag pockets or anything like that. I mean, it's funny, like people say that the man's fear is like, oh, they're just getting these impressionable kids, and taking their money for $50 crypto courses, I'm like, I work with guys 40 to 65, bro. Like again, if you really, if that's how what your impression is, come to my thing. In fact, I even invited the guys on the show. So anyway, long story short, I did Kate Willett, but I also did this new show. I'll let you know what the title of it is when they drop it, but it's, it's Tray Crou,

it might be Tray Crouder show, but it's all in the studio. Oh, man, I will tell you this right now. No, not to take anything away from you, Kyle. This studio here, we shoot in high-def, we got multiple cameras, we got good lighting and everything else. But man, let me tell you when I went in there, it was like, is good production, at least is good production as the Danza project when I go and do those. Very well polished, they have producer, they have a sound guide, they have the guy who's the director, who's, who's there saying, okay, like we stopped, like at the end of the show and he made Tray read my introduction, bucks introduction again because he wanted to get it like perfect, right, because it's all recorded. But the guy who is next to me, the, the, the, the, the, he was a conservative comedian, but he's gay. Top of everything out, I'm the only heterosexual, like I'm the only one who's not transsexual, I'm the heterosexual dude in all of this and I'm the Godfather of the Managed Fury, right? But it was a very good, I'm so proud of this and I really, I didn't know it was going to be this good. And then I'm kind of hoping that because these guys have worked with Amazon Prime and they

work with HBO and these other big heavy hit and, you know, like Discovery Channel, not shit. I'm hoping somebody's going to see this and go, damn, we need to do more of this, we need to get something like this off the ground because honestly, that show has the potential to be a game changer, not just for me, but for them as well. Everybody that was involved in it because I think that could go, that could be the next format, the next big format, but it was really, really good. But very well polished, very well done, very professional. They flew me out there on JSX of all play. Like from Vegas to J and that is no, that's some, some scratch. So, but I was really good. I just want to tell these guys shout out to Sean Stack and Trey Crowder, man, I will do that at any time you want, man. I loved hanging out with you guys in time. I could have done another two hours with them. We only had a time for an hour, but it was just a really awesome, awesome show. So when that drops, I'll let you guys know. She killed Patrick's kids, let's me forget, yeah, well, that's true. Thank you.

It's wonderful to hear common sense from you on this Clancy Murder. Our society is such a joke. I blame men for being too weak. Yeah. I spoke with chat GPT a few days ago about the probability of rights being rescinded or restricted for women by 2046 and it gave me a 75% likelihood. Be 100% if you keep this shit up. Do women destroy society due to brain instability? No, I don't think so. I think all these women are perfectly normal. I don't think it's instability whatsoever. I think this is how women organize society. This is an experiment. People keep wondering, you know, like the sexual revolution, by the way, is still an ongoing experiment in 2026. I don't know if you guys are realize that. It's still an ongoing experiment. We're still in the middle of a societal reengineering program. And it's not like, it's not because there's anything, that's a whole thing.

The mistake is to think that women's thinking is in some way aberrant. It's not. This is how women organize society. Lindsey Clancy is just a byproduct of how women organize society. It's not instability. It's not, well, they're all crazy. Like when I talk about hi-bristophilia, that's because they're damaged. No, they're not fucking damaged. They're just following that imperative. And there's no limit. There's nobody saying they shouldn't. There's nobody trying to grab them and saying, no, don't jump off the cliff. Don't kill your kids. There's nobody doing that because guys don't, if anything, it's men's instability. What the fuck are we doing? You know, we got to, we got to go and take care of business here. Remember, and tender swindler? Remember when the, the main chick who took out the nine bank loans for that guy, the main girl that's on there, when she first decided she was going to go meet up with this guy? She told her dad. She told her best friends. And none of them said, hey, I don't know if this is a good idea. You're going to get on the plane with something you don't even know.

You're going to fly, you're going to go into white slavery, right? They're going to tell you as a, you're going to go to Dubai and do some really bad things, right? Like, nobody said that. And my first, when I first saw this, I'm like, where's your brother? Where's her dad? Where is a man to say, bitch, you are not getting on that plane? I will come there and physically keep you. I will bear hug your ass. I will zip tie you to the chair so you don't fucking do this because this is absolutely insane. You're going to die. Where was the guy? Where was the dad? Where was the brother? Where was the ex boyfriend? I don't know if she even had a boy. Where's the man? Where's the nephew? I don't care. Where's the male figure in her life that she said this to him that, no, you're not getting on a plane with some dude. There was no one there to do that. Now is that sort of dereliction of sort of some sort of masculine duty? No, it's not because you know why guys were like, well, she needs to explore her options. Like, it's guys basically lying down. They don't care. I go, I wouldn't want to step on your toes and let you like, you know, ruin the magic

or some bullshit like that. It's because guys have the, if anything, it's guys instability. She's just following out. I want to get with hot guy. That's hard-coded, you know. Let's see here. Great show, Rollo, repeal the 19th. God again. Five. Oh, hey, Ask a Brother. Jeff St. James, he's got a new book coming out and he's got a party that's coming up pretty soon too. Sorry, I'm sorry, I don't have the details set. Ask a brother. Jeff, I will come on your show anytime you want me to. Again, I've been on the show already. Mike was just on there too. It was great. The story you did about Clark Kent and Bruce Wayne Superman versus Batman was a good show. Hi, Pergamy. Thank you. You know who was inspired by? By the book, Why Men Are the Way They Are by Dr. Warren Farrell. There's actually a part in there how like he would go say, you know, women want the guy who's like sort of this mild man or guy and then they want to go and fuck Batman, right?

That's where that came from. The 35 year old woman wants a man to solve the problems she's ignored or created. She doesn't want him enough for the long term stable relationship. And the longer women can stay viable or think they can stay viable in the sexual marketplace, the longer she takes to try to find that, the longer she spends with the, you know, focusing on the bad boy and then when she gets later on that's all, well, you know, I'm done with the bad boy. I had my fun. No fun for you. Scott G. Scott Galloway, economically viable, economically viable men, economically viable men. Yes, yes, yes. Everybody's got to be viable. Before I found the red pill, I had a theory that hormonal birth control affected the type of guys girls were attracted to. It was coped at the time because I was a loser. I was ashamed for it, but it was right. Yeah, it is your correct about it.

I think people don't understand the, that hypergamy isn't canceled because of hormonal birth control. If you read any of the work that Marty Hazleton has done that nobody wants to read anymore because they think ovulatory shift isn't a thing and it actually is a fucking thing. But in that, in her book, hormonal, she even talks about the, like, accounts for the factor of having hormonal birth control as some sort of mitigating, you know, obstacle whatever for, for hyper, what would be hypergamy, right? With ovulatory shift. What I think is one of the things she found is it doesn't necessarily negate the ovulatory cycle of, you know, loodial phase and everything or women being attracted to guys in their fertile phase and then, you know, what is it? Post-missile shift, or PMS. PMS in the later phases, right? It still accounts for something is just that the hormonal birth control has the effect

of compressing it or depressing all of that. So it's there's not, like, normally it'd be up here with hormonal birth control. It's compressed down here, right? So it's not like women, like, I said, well, I married the wrong guy. Why? Because I was a birth control. I wouldn't have fucked him otherwise. You would have because he was the only guy that was available in the town that you live in. So, odds are you probably still would have. But to more to the point, yes, your natural cycle was depressed or compressed when that happened. So, when they go off of it and it comes back up, then it might be like, well, I'm more horny, but I'm not horny for him. I'm really horny for somebody else than the natural state comes back. Again, not me, Marty Hazelton and all that research. How does she has to know you can support her kids? That is correct and right. Nothing wrong with that. You're talking about the opportunism stuff. Yes, and there's nothing wrong with that. The thing is people, I hate it when people give me shit for hypergamy.

I'm trying to break the bad news to them. Sorry. You're going to be in insella sexist permavergine because hypergamy, that's not what I'm saying. Oh, if only we could just get women not to be hypergamous, then it would save the world. No, you would destroy the world. The reason why we're the apex species on planet Earth has a lot to do. It's somewhat in part to women's ability to want the best of the best, to fuck the best of the best, and to lock down and pair bond with the best of the best. Again, don't take best of the best as a literal statement. I'm just saying this figuratively. I know. I've got to point that out to people who are the literalist spurs. Please join reignite. Thank you, Steve. Oh, Steve, do you feel like a sheep? And I'm the shepherd. You really need to come to, like, I would encourage that guy to come to any of my Zoom calls. Every Thursday at 4 p.m. Pacific, 7 p.m. Eastern time, if you want to be involved, you want

to come on into the Zoom call. I'll comp you one. Come on in and see what we do. Seriously. There you go. All right. What is it? I mean, just watch out. Fire the best of the best of all of that stuff. So many fuck 100 million to find a blog. Okay. Thank you, Capslock Hustler, for your contribution to the AIDS conversation. That's why you put it. You want me to read it loud, right? That's how you get me to do it. You're lucky we didn't do the demon voice. We'll do that one next time with some of the pipes up. Pipe down you. Settle down you. One more guy that needs to settle down is this dumb fuck right here. So getting back to the hypochemy misinformation train, here's this perk again. Pergam Miss at all. You are so hypergamist, you won't have sex with a guy until the guy is the guy that you're looking. Of course, and then if I had sex with guys and then they made less than me and then you'd say, oh, because we broke up, it proves that none of those interactions counted, right?

I think the fact that you are a virgin right now just proves a point that you're hypergly, like to a very high degree. The fact that I'm abstinent means that I'm waiting for someone richer than me. No, no, hypergamy doesn't need women or bad. I'm not. I'm not even implied that. Hypergamy is just an algorithm. It's an evolutionary adaptation of women at the time. I'm not sure if it's an evolutionary adaptation. I think the reason women have historically been hypergamists is because they were barred from higher education. So obviously the average man was going to earn more than them. Hypergamy has nothing to do with men. I'm using the current definition of hypergamy, which is that women date someone with a superior, sociological or monetary background. This is Farah debating role to Masi and Michael Sartana or whatever podcast. She says that to her, attraction has nothing to do with a man's career or finances. She said it could be a random dude off the street. She's describing exactly what attraction is to most people, unpredictable. So they hit her with hypergamy. Women date up, women want to richer man. But she's telling them that money is not the factor she's using to decide her future partner. So they immediately say, well, hypergamy isn't about money. It's just an algorithm.

An evolutionary adaptation. The minute she points out that money is not the issue, now all of a sudden hypergamy has nothing to do with money. They're so desperate for hypergamy to be a real thing that they constantly have to change the definition. When a woman marries a rich guy, see its proof of hypergamy. When a woman marries a broke guy, well hypergamy was never about money. No, it was about his 10 inch dick is, let's see, 18 inch guns. It's almost like a work in the multifaceted. Imagine that. And by the way, completely hack. The video that he's like sort of picking apart there, he's reacting to is like three and a half years old. First of all, it's a clip of a clip. So it's a hack of a hack by a hack is what this is. And I think it was funny. He's like, oh, see, they really desperately wanted to hypergamy to be true. Well, tell me what else. It's just complete chaos. It's like, that's the thing against me. Like whenever I explain hypergamy to people or it doesn't have to be that, it could be any

kind of mating strategy. It could be any kind of, if I talk about, let's see, what is it, alpha widows? Or if I talk about, let's see, the warb rides dynamic. If I talk about any of that kind of stuff, I'm like, well, let me tell you, it's basically them tearing apart an argument that wasn't an argument to begin with. And for the most part, it's all based on sort of uninfluently, it's confident ignorance. It's based on not understanding any of the background of anything, right? But the problem is, is that because of that, they're very confident in their assessment of all of this. But they simply don't understand the background of what we talk about hypergamy. Neither did Farah, but in that moment when we were talking on the whatever podcast, and by the way, that was the infamous podcast where Mike kind of got disrespected by Kylie in that one, that nobody wants seems to want to let Mike live down. But we were on that and you got to remember, I'm going to show you, I will show you the

full clip because I think that you need that for context because this guy is making, like I said, it's a hack of a hack. So he's responding, he's reacting to a clip that Farah made to sort of build her up. This is what I really said, no, it's not. And that clip actually she put out in 2024, I think somewhere around there, maybe towards the end, because she was supposed to come on access Vegas. You didn't know that, did you? She was supposed to come on our show. She was supposed to be me, her, Farah and Jasmine Jafar and Mike. We were all four of us were supposed to go and we were going to do it at Sticky Puzzles back in the Sticky Puzz days. And we were supposed to do that. And then so, but to preempt all of that, she decided she was going to put out this very highly edited clip, which is the clip that he's responding to right now. You didn't know that because how could you know that? But you're very confident in your assessment of everything that happened in that clip.

So really, before you do stuff like that, dude, whose name I don't remember. But and again, I know this guy, he just wants attention. So here's that fucking attention you wanted. I'll show you the real full length clip so you can get a wrap your head around it. But the point of making is this, as far as the hypergamy goes, she just simply didn't know what the definition was. And you know why she didn't and why she kept sticking to that. It's because she had her phone down here the whole time she was talking. You can see this on the thing where she's looking down because she had destiny and all their crew feeding her lines and feeding her information as she went along. She even said that there's an interview with the week after this where they admitted that he was on the phone with her trying to feed her lines. She couldn't read them. In fact, destiny got really angry with her because she couldn't read them or she couldn't deliver them fast enough because destiny didn't know what I was going to say.

So it was really, she was mouthing the words that destiny was sort of feeding her during that because you'll see her doing this quite a bit, right? I even had people, I went back and I looked at the chat logs on that particular episode and people in the episode were saying she's reading it from like they saw what was going on. I couldn't because I couldn't see the chat when I was there. But later on, I realized that I didn't know it at the time because I didn't know that she was actually sort of a destiny plant, right? I should also point this out to you too is that she was also on the payroll for the NGO or, not the NGO, on the, for, was it progressive victory? She was being paid. She was a sock puppet for progressive victory. Yes, she was a fairer. It was a one of, yeah, so she was one of progressive victories. Destiny was sort of the ringleader there. And if you look at any of the, now they don't get along quite so well, but like you could, if you look at any of the shows that she did immediately after that episode, you can tell that she was fucking him or there was something else going on between the two of

them. Then you could also look at Jasmine Jafar, who was also on the payroll of progressive victory. So anything that came, comes out of her mouth is kind of like it's got an asterisk in the first place. But second of all, it's like, you're going to say, well, you know, well, you guys are trying to, to change up the definition on the fly, you're moving the goal post. No, we're not moving the goal post. We have always said alpha fucks beta bucks since as far back as, well, in my case, since as far back as like 2002 on the social forums. It's been a fundamental, you know, concept that I've been using since I started my blog since I talk about it in every single book, all six books, every single one of them. It's there's, there's no, there's no moving of the goal post. There's no switching off. Oh, well, you said it was marriage and then you said it was something else. And I don't know alpha fucks beta bucks, which is why I'm trying to say, maybe we should stop calling it. Maybe you're right. Maybe you're doing me a favor. Maybe we should call it stop calling it hypergamy and start referring to it as a dual

mating strategy because that's really what hypergamy is. We changed the definition a long time ago. You know who else refers to it as alpha fucks and beta bucks, like not in so many words, but who uses the quote unquote expanded definition of hypergamy. Jordan Peterson. Jordan Peterson had several of his talks, especially back in like 2018, 2019, was using the expanded definition of hypergamy to say women also like to fuck hot guys. Oh, well, if they're homeless and everything does that mean that hypergamy doesn't exist? No, actually, I just reconfirms that it exists. You say, well, and it's all falsifiable. No, it's not all falsifiable. It's women want to get with the best of the best. I don't understand why this is fucking rocket science to any of you. Good. Actually, I do because you're just trying to pick it apart because you need something to talk about because you have no confidence. Status or dominance or a vibe, the way they try to define the word makes it so that there's no outcome that can disprove it. And a claim that can never be wrong is no longer about facts. It's about a religion.

Women were barred from a lot of high paying jobs and education for the majority of human history. Now that women make a make a now you're a feminist, now you're sneaky. Now you're now you're a V.G. male. Is that what this is all about? Now you're found their own money. They can make choices beyond monetary and throughout history men have out-earned women. So they have funny. We've talked to women on our show that I'm sure you haven't seen Axis Vegas, but we've talked to women on our show who have essentially moved guys who are an I quote, homeless into their living situation because the dick was that good because hypergamy is not just about the guy who makes a lot of money. The homeless guy who can't possibly make that kind of a, no, we're, as a matter of fact, we're looking at the gender divide right now between men and women because men cannot economically keep up with a high value, go to go to high value woman, right?

And when women are out earning men, what is left? If the beta-buck side, the provisioning protection and parental investment side of hypergamy is already made, is already present, is already locked down. What's left? Alpha fucks. I'm going to move the homeless guy into my, because I need good dick and that's all this guy provides because I can provide everything else for myself. All the beta-bucks, if all of the things that you're criticizing, guys about, well, you know, they were, men were, or women were, but weren't permitted in school and well, now they are. And now you can see it and what has happened as a result of that, right? Now women have education. Now women are, women account for, well, now women took what, a 98.7% of the new jobs that were created last quarter. Doesn't sound to me like women are fucking suffering here, okay? But do those women, those women now, they're making all this money, they're making a whole

lot more money. And so it can't just be based on, on marrying up because who wants to marry a fucking average guy, that's what we keep saying, average women don't want to get with average guys. Why is that, why would that be a problem? It's a problem because women are hypergamous, dumb fuck, that's why. It's because of dual mating strategy. Women want the guy, they want to marry the guy who makes at least 60% on top of what they are making. The guy has to make more money. What is the number one precipitator of divorce in, in, in the, in divorce, when women file for divorces? Would you like me to show you here? I will show you right now, I'm going to keep that guy, I'm going to keep him right there, but I do have to show you this, how long was it? This is perfect timing for this too. Is it was, it was Galway and Arthur, no, not Arthur Brooks now, was it Galway, the

Galway and sexton? Yeah, perfect, is this it? Yeah, here we go. Okay, so if, if hypergamous is not a thing, then why would divorce be the number one precip, or the predictor divorce is economic, specifically when the man in the relationship stops making money or is making less money than the woman. The likelihood of divorce doubles when the woman starts making more money. Why would that be, dumbfuck? Guy who wants attention, why would that be? Explain to me if it's not hypergamy, what is it? They've been the man, and it's not something we like to talk about because it positions women in an uncomfortable light, what we're missing. Why would they be uncomfortable? It's just chaotic, it just, it just happens, it's just like, you, you can't predict attraction, right? The data set is men when they lose their economics, vitality, they become insecure and quite frankly, unproductive in the relationship. Why would that be a thing? Why would that be a problem? Maybe that's something that they need to work out because it's just random and unpredictable.

We don't know anything about, there's no such thing as hypergamy. Why would women want a divorced man who are, they're making more money than right now? See it from both sides because I represent husbands, I represent wives. It's a really heartbreaking thing to see because there are so many politicians on the right in particular that talk about the sanctity of marriage. Yet, when we look at the statistics that talk about marriage does better when people have economic stability and can meet their basic needs, they're not in distress. People who have a bachelor's degree or higher have lower divorce rates, creating conditions where there's, why would that be? Why would, why would that bachelor or lower, why would they have lower divorce rates? There's catastrophic job loss and putting massive strain on marriages might be more worth your attention than gripping about no fault divorce and how it's ruining the world. So there are real solutions to these problems, but part of a serious discourse as opposed to the boy versus girl thing that works so well. There you go. Right? So why would that be a problem? Why would divorces increase if hypergamy wasn't a thing?

At least from an economic standpoint, right? Associate status standpoint for sure. Why would divorce be the number one precip- or I would- your job inequalities, earnings. Why would earnings be the number one precipitator of divorce? I'll wait. See, here's the problem and I'll stop being a dick, okay, for a minute. See the problem is, is like when you only look at one side of that equation, that's where the problems start. That's why understanding, duomating strategy is vital to our conversation about this gender divide, about men's loneliness, everything you can think of, every issue, every men's issue, male suicide, divorce women's divorcing men at 70% when you look at economics, when it comes to women getting what, 97, 98% of the jobs from last quarter, when you look at all of these factors and then you factor in hypergamy into that equation.

Like, I've had this conversation, well, a while back I did, but Richard Reeves is constantly saying, well, we need to make stay-at-home dads sexy. We need to make house husbands desirable. Why would you need to do that? Why wouldn't they be desirable in the first place? Why is it so difficult for women to want to desire and want to fuck a guy who says, stay at home dad? Why wouldn't that be? Why do we need to even encourage that? Why do we need to encourage men to get into more like sort of, quote unquote, feminized, feminine jobs? Why do we need, why do we want to, we've been trying to do it for quite some time? Why have we been unsuccessful at it? Because hypergamy, because of duomating strategy. You can't, it's like telling me or telling Kyle, hey, you know what, Kyle, I think you should start fucking fat chicks. I think you chicks that you don't really, I mean, really obese fucking fat chicks. Because they need love too. I mean, you would save Western culture if you could just get over yourself and lower

your standards and fuck fat chicks, man. I just, like, don't you want to save the West? You're going to have to fuck that's exactly what you're trying to tell women. You should in some way find women who are men who are beneath you or socioeconomically or have lower status who are like who are on the performance hierarchy that I was just telling you about. That performance hierarchy is also the sexual performance sexual dominance hierarchy too. There are better men and there are less are men. I guess who gets the pussy? The guys who are better, right? The guys who, and we're, and that's contextual too. So I say, well, you, what about the homeless guy that she's fucking? Better because the guy looks good and he lays down the good dick. If that guy was making no money and he was a homeless bomb and he had a little dick and he was fat, probably not getting taken home to fuck. It's the, it's what I, it's the, the home, what do you call that? What was it? What do you call a snow border with no girlfriend?

Homeless, right? Because why was that? There's a joke up in when I was living in Tahoe. Because or you can say musician, rock musician without a girlfriend, he's homeless, a bass player without a girl. Because it's because women don't, like they don't need the guy to make a lot of money, they just need him to fuck. And that's so they're willing to move the guy in because there's another criteria for hypergamy that has nothing to do with socioeconomic. I'm going to tell you right, I can tell you from personal experience, the most fucking tale I got in my life was when I was at my poorest. It was when I didn't have two fucking nickels. I had my, my net assets, my, my net assets, when I was like 24, 25 years old, I had a Toyota pickup with no trail, with no, no tailgate. It had the net across the back, right? I had a Randall half stack, I had two guitars, I had my effects pedals and that was the most, that's what I could cash out if I had to take it to a pawn shop, right?

I got more ass during the time I was 21 until it was probably, tell it, watch it, I still get, I still get late today, right? But I got more, all of my body count of 41 was right around the ages of 21 to about 20, well certainly by the time I met my wife, tell us 28, right? In that period of time and I had nothing, I wasn't worried about whether or not my bed cover came from bedbath and beyond. I didn't worry about fucking candles. I didn't worry about fucking, let's see, sorry Monica, I wasn't worried about responsive desire versus like, there was no responsive desires, like you all want to come over and fucking your hair doors open. That was it, right? We're worried about shit like that and I wasn't worried about money at that time because I was a guy that these women wanted to have that experience with. Why? Why?

Because they thought I was going to make a shit ton of money or was it because I was in a sexual experience that they wanted to have at that time. Problem just show the picture of you and your younger. Oh God. I should, I don't have it handy, I should, I'll go dig it up. Yeah, I should. Oh my God. Yeah, I had a lot of hair down here and I was in a rehearsal studio at that one. Yeah, I know it was, there's this trend going on right now on Instagram where it's like you go and you get like chat GPT to like show you what you would look like in the 80s. Oh, okay. And it's like, so all these chicks that I know on the on-axis Vegas, they're like putting these posts and these things up there and it says, and it's like, you know, kind of like show yours, you know, they want you to do it too. And I'm like, I don't need chat GPT to show you what I look like in the 80s. I got this right here, you go. Yeah. I don't need, I don't need chat GPT for this. This is what I thought too. You look like Shawn Michaels in prime. I did. I did. Oh God. Shawn Michaels.

Really? Oh. Why is it I always get compared to a professional wrestler for fuck's sake? I mean, you have longer hair than Shawn Michaels. Somebody kept, so who was the other guy, um, plays in a band too. I can't remember his name. Chris Jericho. People say I look like Chris Jericho. Chris Jericho. Yeah. Do I look like Chris Jericho? Do I look like Chris Jericho? I know. I got a better body than Chris Jericho. I can tell you that right now. He looks pretty good in his old age though. Yeah. Yeah. Shit. With long hair. Yeah, with long hair. There you go. Yeah. Yeah. I give you that one. That was pretty good. You guys said I didn't say it. There you go. Chris Jericho right there. I do not see the connection. I don't have something he has a mustache. I never had a mustache.

I never planned to have one. Uh, okay. Let me, since just out of common decency, I like to marry someone who out-earned them, thus proving hypergamy. But now women make up the majority of the workforce and yet they're still finding men to date. So if hypergamy is some fixed evolutionary law about chasing richer men, it should be getting stronger instead is falling apart because- No, it's not falling apart. That's just the problem is because you have this, which is exactly what I was trying to tell Thera during that whole fucking exchange that she clipped out and you conveniently clipped out as well. Is that hypergamy is not just about marrying up. It's not just about socioeconomics. It's also about fucking up. That's why that's the explanation for you right there. And we're not shifting gears and we're not moving the goalpost or anything like that because everything I've ever posted on this says the same fucking thing. Alpha fucks beta bucks. Dual mating strategy if you prefer.

It's a curb this fucking high, man. Just- you just gotta get up but over it. But you don't care to get over it because that's not what- that wasn't your whole point. Your whole point is to be anti-manosphere. When these guys want to be anti-manosphere, they gotta go hit the biggest dude in the prison yard. Right? And you're just gonna keep coming at me. You're like, oh, you wanted to debate you. No, I'm not gonna debate you because I'm already debunking your fucking argument right here. That's it. And I can go- see, here's the thing is like- one of the things that gets me out, I was just saying like how Pearl is sort of running out of gas with like the feminists. I saw her- I hate to say I kind of feel bad for her because I don't like her but I kind of feel bad for the exasperation. It's like constant doing the same thing over and over again and not- it's like running in place, right? It's just like- I don't want to see anybody do that. But the thing is, there's a reason why is because you come into the same- species arguments.

Sorry, like over and over and over again. Again, as I was saying before, nobody debates anymore because the winner is not decided by who had the best argument. It's by who has the biggest audience. That's all it is. And I don't- and honestly, I don't care because I know what I'm talking about. I know exactly what I was saying in this exchange and if you'd like me to show a hair in a minute, see if I got it. Pretty sure I've got it right here. There you go. Oh, okay. And then so this was actually- I'll just- I don't play the whole thing because it's a little bit long but this was- This was the only trans- and your virgin and you just explain to us that you're waiting for like some very high quality guy- I didn't say high quality. I read. Okay. So what would your dear ideal guy then? High level of chemistry. When you say high value, you're probably relating to income, high, things like that.

High value, but I mean like it's high enough to- So A, she presumes I'm talking about high value. Hergo, she doesn't understand Al-Fuck's Bay of Books, she doesn't understand that hypergamy. If you want to say it's about- if it's just about marrying up or economic- because what is she doing? She's down here and it's- it's- it's- it's destiny saying, hypergamy means- it means a socio-economics, he's wrong, it's about marrying up. And notice that she says, you're probably going to say this because that's what- That's she's reading verbatim. He's probably going to say this from destiny right during that entire exchange. So sort of be your ideal guy that would be the guy that you would want to say. So if you have the same metrics of ideal, what do you mean by ideal? I'm just asking you, what would be your ideal that you would want to have in a guy so that you have to- I agree with you. For me romantic hemistory is incredibly volatile, it's not based on any barometers of like, oh he's in school, he has this career or anything.

So could just be random dude off the street? 100%, I am not hypergamous at all. I think you're probably way more hypergamous than you think you are. Yeah, I'd recommend you. In fact you are so hypergamous you won't have sex with a guy until the guy is the guy that you're looking for. Of course and then if I had a fight with guys and then they were, you know what I mean, made less than me and then you'd say, oh because we broke up it proves that none of those interactions counted right? Can I ask you a little? I can't really tell the mic's on a little. Telled it. Other way. There you go. I think the fact that you are a virgin right now just proves a point that you're hypergamous. Like to a very high degree. The fact that I'm abstinent means that I'm waiting for someone richer than me. No, so you're confused. See how she's, this is where this dumb fuck fucks everything up, right? These are the parts that he's not showing but it's not him. I can't blame this dude because he's just using the clips that fair a farmed for her own thing because he's responding reacting to her clips, right? As I said, it's a hack of a hack by a hack.

That's what the whole thing's about. This is with this high pargamous with this idea that women are bad. Hypergamy doesn't mean women are bad. And did I say bad? I wouldn't even imply that. Yeah, you are the one who's saying that he, you're putting words in his mouth. I'm just asking you what would be your ideal enough to get the guy. A word of this notion of women being bad come in. No, nobody said no one is saying that. Yeah, you're, but you're saying to him, you're putting words in his mouth about what he's going to say next after you have sex. That's the word. And that he's going to judge you and that's not what we're saying. Hypgamy is just an algorithm. It's an evolutionary adaptation that women have. It's not a negative or a positive thing. Like you said it's not negative. I'm not sure if it's an evolutionary Bootitian. I think the reason women have historically been hypergamous is because they were bad from higher education. So obviously the average man was going to earn more than them. But by 2050, Renathia total reversal hypergamy. Hypergamy in the... The renathia hypergamy. Hypergamy in the Pleistocene Epochni. Hypergamy in the Pleistocene Epochni. Was because of a bad from education? In general, that we can't really deduce anything from hypergamy historically because men on average have just made more than women. out earning men.

I'm going to be existing. I'm graduating. I'm graduating. I'm just telling you studies have shown but my point is, you know what you do. What you do, what you do, what you do, what you do, what you do, what you do. I'm not what you reverse love my part. Okay, so this is where she falls. This is how you know Destiny's coaching her. You know my favorite line. There's studies that show. That's it. That's that. There's studies that show. Yeah, okay. Well, they sure to have Destiny email me those links so that I can look at those because that's because that's she's her argument falls apart when Mike and I say her pergamy existed before money existed, right? Before when we were living in hunter gatherer tribal societies, hypergamy existed, right? It's a like it's a it's part of the human firmware. And you know, Mike, maybe Mike characterized it as good or he made a judgment call right there good or bad. But the thing is, we're not trying to say it's good. Well, the fact we try to say it's not that it's good or it's bad. It just is what it is, right? But she here, the reason why she can't defend this is because she's, first of all, she's

getting all her information from Destiny who is saying, well, it's because women were historically oppressed, but it almost sounds like she's rattling something off from rope memorization right there. Well, it's because she's reading it, right? But the thing is is that she, there were both of them were not prepared for the argument that hypergamy is an evolutionary dynamic and not a social dynamic. That's where this dumb fuck is falling apart, right? Because he still wants to cling to the fact, oh, you know, women were barred from working and so therefore they had the hypergamy as a result of that. No, no hypergamy, like if you read anything that we have talked about, if you read anything that David bus has done, if you read anything that's, what is it? David, forget the guys, forget the, it's the guy that talked about. Perennial investment theory, forget the guy's name. If you look at any of the, you look at any of the guys who are like talking about actual evolution biology. Hell, we can look at the, we can look at the, the plotting of the human genome, right?

You can, why is, how is it that we know that gang is con is like responsible for, like it was at one and every 200 guys on planet earth can draw a direct genetic lineage back to gang is con. Okay. Well, so it's very similar or for instance we look at, what was it? There's the, the biolog, the genomic studies, I'm trying to remember this from, from rope memorization here, genetics, genomic studies of, from about 8,000 years ago because once if we were able to plot the human genome, we went back in time. We started going back and plotting it like where did this come from, right? So there's a genomic record that goes along with it. So I believe it's one and every, one man for every 17 women as far back as 8,000 years ago reproduced, okay? And that is also taking into account, taking into account warfare and plague and you know, sickness and stuff like that as well. Now, things have changed because the mortality rate has gone down.

So have, what is it? Yeah, there it is. Genomic studies have shown that throughout human history, more women than men successfully passed down their DNA reaching an extreme bottleneck about 4,000 to 8,000 years ago where 17 women reproduced for every one man. Why? Why is that? And the other thing is right now that you see cultural factors in quality of modern ratios because right now it's more like seven to one, okay? And we can, we can actually point back to where that seven to one ratio starts because it starts right at agriculture, right? When we start farming lands, we're no longer nomads, we're no longer, you know, we're bound to the land at that point, right? You want to know where social-inforced monogamy comes from or the idea of social-inforced monogamy comes from the, from the fact that we stop being nomadic herders and put ourselves into an agrarian lifestyle and an agrarian economy, right? And it makes better sense for one man, one woman instead of having lots of women and

lots of children as we did in the Old Testament, for example, right? And you look at, a fact I was asked about this on Kate Willett's show about, she did the fact check on this, as a matter of fact, was the more, infront mortality rate, worldwide infront mortality rate. I said it was 50%, it's more like 44% or something like that. I mean, infront mortality rate, but you have to go back in time for that. Like right now, infront mortality rate is like 1% or like very, very low as a result of medical, you know, advancements and stuff like that. But the theory is this, is that because infant mortality, what do we have? Average of 25. This is historical. That's historical average, to around 2.45%. That is 24.45 deaths per 1,000 live births. So we have drastically reduced the amount of infront mortality. That's infant mortality. Remember that's infant mortality.

Then there's also by the age five it goes up. So yeah, so you figure that your 50% of your kids are going to die by age five right up until recent times, right? Well, one of the reasons why we have, why we have a quote unquote patriarch, you whatever the hell it is, because it was the most efficient way to maintain that. Or we talk about the fertility rates right now. Well, the reason why fertility rates were so much higher was because half of your kids were going to die before age five as far back as a few hundred years ago, right? So yeah, of course, it behooves you to A, have more wives, and it behooves you to also have more children as a result of that. What is that? 1800 to the 19 to mid-1960s, it was still at, remained high at around 5.0. Wow, that's per 1,000 or that's global. Global. Yeah, we're looking at the data sets right now. I wish it was giving to you percentage.

It gives you like how many per, how many per 1,000? That's why I percent. Wow, the US general fertility rate has fallen by a, oh, for that's a fertility, for 51, 51 and a half percent over the past century from there to 50. 53.8 per year. 53.8 per year. Wow. Well, we've been below for replacement fertility. That's the difference. It's one thing to say fertility rates have fallen. It's another thing to say below replacement level. It's a whole different animal. The fact of the matter is this is that when you look at, even if it's at 7 to 1, even if it's 1 man for every 7, there's still something going on there. It's not socioeconomic. It's not because women have been barred from higher education. This was before higher education existed. There was no fucking Harvard in the fucking Pleistocene era, right? My colleague says, Plastocene era, not a dog, let's say it right or don't say it at

all in the Paleolithic era. Was it the Paleo diet, right? When they were doing that, there was no fucking higher education back then, okay? Let's see, that's the point. We're trying to tell this child who was on only fans, who by the way still doesn't have any lenses in those glasses because she wants to look like me a caliphus. If you're going to come at me about hypergamy, you might want to use a better example than pharaoh, okay? We already know she's also on the payroll for progressive victory. So was Jasmine Jafar. So was what Amy Knight, so was Amy Dangerfield, so was Vouch, so was Destiny and pretty much any chick that had anything to do with Destiny was probably on the payroll of progressive victory. They were sock puppets. They have admitted that seriously, pharaoh and Jasmine have admitted as much. So what you're doing here is you are conflating hypergamy with the values and the monetary

set and status of today, whereas when we talk about, well, when I've talked about her pergamy in the past, it's not a social construct. It's not something that's been created, it's something that is innate. I'm using the current definition of hypergamy, which is that women date someone with a superior, sociological or monetary background. So socioeconomic background. When we talk about hypergamy, it's not just about money, it's not just about status, it's also about is this guy arousing enough for me to want to get with? Am I here as long as fuck back then? Hot guy is the dude that I want to get with because he does it for me. That's what I was asking you. I'm not asking you how much money does you have to make. I'm just saying, what's your ideal that that guy would get in there? Who would be the guy that would make you the only fans virgin want to have sex with this guy? Wait, I'm confused.

Can you clarify your definition of hypergamy or saying now that someone? hypergamy is very simple. It's alpha fucks and beta bucks. So is this guy arousing? Is he sexual? Is he a good genetic match for me? Is he somebody who turns me on? Does he have a strong jawline? Is he six foot tall? Is he, you know, got a V taper? Does he have a six pack abs? Does he turn me on? There's the arousal side of that. And then there's the beta buck side, which is the provisioning protection and parental investment side of it. So what's your folks saying? Funny how that didn't make it into the fucking clip, did you? Wow, wow, wow, almost shifting the goal post. Fuck you. Fuck you and the horse you rode in on, dude. Now if we had a jet, by the way, I found this clip. Five fucking minutes, man. Just put whatever podcast, roll out to mosque, because I've only ever been on once. You'll find this clip like within like seven seconds, man. Do your homework. If you're going to come at me, come fucking correct, dumb fuck.

Now, as if that's not enough, now we have this, we have this back and forth about what's the definition of hypergamy. That's why I'm saying, well, maybe it's time we just start calling it dual mating strategy. We can avoid this stupid conversation in the first place with Destiny, who was feeding your lines as we went, right? It's like, what's my line? So as if that's not enough. Wait a minute, children, I've got something even better for you. How do I know that she actually agreed with me later on? Well, because she had a really interesting conversation with Destiny, not even a week after this show. I think it's one of the best dates of my life, and we're vibing. And he's talking about how much he hates the porn industry, and how he's like very against porn. I forgot how it came up. I was talking about living in LA, and I was like, yeah, and then I started in only fans, and hid the reaction on his face, and thought about, yeah, Rolo and Red Pill and how they were all right. So yeah, I'm showing him. I'm sorry, what was that again? What? What?

Rolo was right? I'm sorry, I'm a little deaf in this year. Hold on. My content. And yeah, he's not reacting, and I was like, well, what are you thinking? What's going through your head? This isn't a fight. This is like an anecdote. OK. So yesterday, I went on a date with this Tradcon boy. OK. A boy with a boat lunch for like five hours. OK. And then we went to the beach and hung out in the sand. I can tell you have a nice tan? Yeah. Yeah, he didn't ask me if I feel weird about being too brown or like if I felt bad. So it's cool. Just fetishize you for your Islamic everything. And yeah, go ahead. Yeah. So anyways, everything's going perfectly. I love Tradcons because I actually know how to like date and stuff. Yeah. And we're hanging out on the beach, and he's like, I'm like, we're really vibing. Like, this was probably like one of the best dates of my life. OK. And we're vibing. And he's talking about how much he hates the porn industry and how he's like very

against porn. And I was like, yeah, me too, because I forgot that I'm like a prostitute. OK. So then I got really stressed because he wanted to kiss me and I could tell that like if I told him the only fancy thing, I thought it'd be a huge turn off. But I thought it'd be like if I kissed him without telling him since he's so against the porn industry. So I came clean. Does he flip flop his whole opinion? Do you want to flick her? So I shoehorned it into conversation and I was like, I forgot how it came up. I was talking about living in a leg and I was like, yeah, and then I started in only fans and hid the reaction on his face. It was like a gut punch to me. Like it was like fatherly disappointment. OK. It was kind of like the face where he's like, I knew there was like too good to be true. I can't. Oh, I probably was thinking that. But yeah, I know you guys, I'm like a Tradcon wet dream. I'm like a virgin who doesn't leave the house. Wow. So I don't drive after like, yeah, but you know, after like the Stephen Crowder like wife

drama with the car, I feel like I became more attractive in every conservative's eyes because that would never happen with me because I can't drive. So I can never take the car away from my Stephen Crowder. But anyways, I told him and his face changed and I got really bumped out. I kind of thought like while we were talking, he'd eventually like get over it or like change his position now that we've like fallen in love over the course of the past five hours. But I was like, yeah, I know you've been talking about porn and stuff. So I don't know if you're like against it and he goes, yeah, I am against it. And I was like, oh, OK. And then he was like, can I see your content? And I was like, sure. So I was like, showing him my content. What's so funny? No, thank you. What are you thinking? Nothing. Just go for it. There was something you thought that triggered that little smirk. There's a lot of things. I'm thinking about a trigger smirk. But I didn't know the rest of the story goes. I go ahead. What do you think happens? I have no idea. Let's go ahead and find out. Do you want to place bets?

Not really because I didn't see the interactions. But I had to guess I would say either one, he pretends to change his entire position. If one is at no, see the interactively up to this point. I guess the one is that he will pretend to change his entire position because he doesn't actually care about it that much. Or two, is that he has a side of you who doesn't care. But he just wants to see your shit without having to pay for it. Those are my two guesses right now. But let's see what happens. You thought he asked to see my photo like the album just to get free OF content? Yeah. That is more. He probably spent more on the date. Doesn't matter. It's free shit. I don't think he was thinking like that. Possible. I get honor when girls give me their free blanket. Even if it's like five bucks. Oh, cool. But anyways. Go ahead. So I'm swiping through everything. His face is very cold. And I just feel very stressed. Okay. And it's funny because we went out to lunch and we were like drinking and stuff. I'm not supposed to be drinking. Mm-hmm. Unless it's a rise. Okay. But I did anyway. And then I was in the bathroom and I was really stressed. And I actually, like, this is so simple of me.

I took the OF out of my Instagram bio because I was like so stressed. And I was like, should I just delete my account right now, which is probably the dumbest thought I've ever had. So I don't think I'll be drinking anymore. So let me get this straight. She decided she was going to take. She did take the only fans link up for Instagram bio because the guy she, that guy was, oh, I don't know, high quality enough, high value enough to prompt that response out of it. I forgot about that part. To prompt that response out of it. That sounds awfully fucking hyper. And that is actually confirmation of hyper to me. All I heard from that was SSRI. SSRI, yes. It gets better. Hang on. Okay. So that was the thing that I was like, this is so stupid. This is like a first day with someone. I don't know if they'd even care. But I just felt like I heard Rollo Tomassi in my head. What? When he said to me on the podcast, like, do you think you having only fans will prevent you from finding the guy who you do eventually want to have sex with? And I'm like, when he said that, I thought that was ridiculous because I started my OF

and LA and nobody there cares. Mm-hmm. Okay. You know, would you agree? Um, I don't know. I don't know. There's a lot of stuff going on here, but just keep talking. I'm listening. There's a lot of stuff going on. Yeah. There's just like 50 things, but there's stories. But I just want to hear, we'll get to the end. What do you mean 50 things? Name two. Okay. This is annoying now. I just wanted to put that point in there like she was hearing my voice in there. She was hearing this. Oh my god. Okay. So that's, there is that, but the other thing is, I don't know if I should show this video. I've shown this video because I have it on tab. But people really want me to, I will. If she hit up, slid into Justin Waller's DMs literally the day after the day of that

show, thus confirming everything I said during that show about hypergamy. Don't believe me. I have the video. I don't want to do it because I've done it once before and I don't want to put, I don't want to put, if Jay gives me the permission, I would do it. But I have like Jay, Jay sent me this too. It's a video of him like scrolling through his Instagram. And I don't want to show the whole thing because it shows her phone number on it too. She actually gives him her phone number in the, in the scroll thing. But it's just basically a DM from her to, and she's the one who initiates it by the way. It's started by her. She slides into his, his DMs and it's, she's basically like, oh, I just moved to, to Miami. And I don't know much about the place or anything. And then so of course Justin's like, hey man, I'll show you around or no, no, he said, like as he made a, he made a typo, he says, I'll come and help you explore the place. But instead he said, explode the place. Which I think you should have stuck with. But yeah, so later on, she slides like during like literally the day of or the day after

that episode, it was on May 7th, I think it was May 8th that she hit him up. And I don't, I'm not saying they fuck, I'm not even saying that he's the one that she's talking about in the, in the story, mentioning in the story right here. But I have the proof that she did slide into just Justin Waller's DMs. Okay. So once again, dumb fuck, we are women guy, whatever your name is. I'm not going to debate you because I don't have to. I have all the receipts because I was there. I saw it happen live in real time. You did not. I know you're confident in your fucking ignorance and I know you're really grasping for straws to find some way to take down the atmosphere because you think that that's what's going to pay the fucking bills. Don't try to, don't come at me because you come, you mess with the bull, you get the horse man. I'm way ahead of you. I'm faster than you. I'm smarter than you. I'm stronger than you and I am just fucking better than you. So just like just leave it alone, go fuck with somebody else because everything you're

talking about, it's already been done to death. No need to talk about it anymore. There you go. Bye bye. Bye bye. I want to point something else out. See this book? Isn't this awesome? This is the Arabic version and I didn't know that they read like this. Like it reads this way. Yeah, yeah, yeah, reads like manga. So the new Arabic version, I got all six of them are available. Now go get them. If you read Arabic, I can't read it but goddamn word to this. I couldn't even, I just know that I would get this kind of, oh, this is rational mail. There's English on the front here. But all versions are available now in Arabic. This by the way is the only official version of the book. There are other bootleg versions of this. This is the one that I believe is available on Amazon now. But if you want the book, all any of the books in my series in Arabic, you can get them now. What about Turkish? Drolo, we need Turkish. Turkey is, Turkish is on the list.

It is the next language that I'm working on. So that will be the next one. I got this because it was just like everybody wouldn't want it in Arabic and they wanted to get it going. So that's that. I wanted to point one more thing out really quickly because I got kind of got into it. I was going to say get into it. I was, got some pushback anyways from Monica, Monica Amager. Very good friend of mine. And I told her, I said, if I come at you, if I challenge you on Twitter, don't think it's like a personal attack. I'm just pushing back on ideas, right? That's what we do. Especially content creators who are in this space, expect there to be some back of fourth. We don't always agree on everything. But one of the things I keep seeing over and over and over again is this idea of responsive desire. And I'm going to tell you right now, responsive desire is a cope. Okay. Why is that? Well, because there's this idea and I'm just going to quote a few things here. There's this idea about the differences between attraction and arousal and desire.

And it's like, we're just, it's semantics really. But one of the ideas is like married women. And by the way, the only people who have any familiarity or any kind of agreement with the concept of responsive desire are married women. Okay. So, responsive desire, the chicks that are down here, like the chicks that sapphire, they don't know what the fuck it is. A single chick who's 23, 25 years old, what? They have one form of desire. Is he hot? Yes, let's fuck. That's it. It's all there is. You didn't have to take the trash out. And what was it like the, like all the guys wife mode, right? They're trying to go better pick up the color, pick this up and do the dishes and make sure she's happy all the time. She's like, here she comes. Look busy. You know, it's like surveillance society. I say, I've always said, you know, like the feminist utopia is a police state.

They're turning pretty much, this is Christian, Christian marriage into a police state as well. You're a child. I feel like I've got a big kid in the house. Yeah, because you make it so. Oh, so what do you say, Rolo? You should just kick your shoes off anywhere you want to. No, but I'm also saying that it's the only people who think that's funny are people who know who can, who that resonates with, right? Better keep mama happy. Here comes mom. She, and then they call her wife. Then I call her wife. Then I call her name. Here comes mom. She's mom now. Her name changed, right? She's, she's no longer, she's no longer Jennifer or Karen or whatever, Ashley, whatever. Now she's mom. You're not married to a chick. You're not married to a woman. You're married to mom. Dude, that's, that's a fucking sick to me right now. I don't know what I'm saying. Oh, you got to be a dickhead and just like a throes close around be a, be a, be a fucking slob or whatever.

No, it's not, it's not the slob. It's the, it's the I'm being watched. I better do this. It's cookie time for good boy, which is if I don't get enough gold stars and all the things that I'm supposed to do in the house and she doesn't see me doing them, then I'm not going to get my peepee touched. That's what it comes down to, right? And so when we talk about when we look at this kind of shit and we say, well, she, why is my wife not having sex with me? Well, because women are, they have what's called responsive desire. No, you don't want to fuck that guy. Simple as that. You don't want to fuck that guy, you know, the guy that's picking up the clothes and picking up his shoes and, and making sure you hear him watching the guy love for you. She doesn't want to fuck that guy. A responsive desire means fuck all to her for the guy that she doesn't have sex with. She didn't have to worry about responsive desire when you guys were just dating, when you met her in college, when she was fucking the guy in the phone cannon party in Cancun. There was no responsive desire in that. It was just like, fuck yeah, he's hot. Let's go. That's what gets me. Right?

There's no, you want to foster real fucking desire in your relationships. Stop. A responsive desire is a cope. It is saying, I have a fucking headache. That's what it is. I don't want to fuck tonight. Why, I'm going to have you, he didn't get me warmed up enough. I didn't get up to it. He didn't need to get up to it when we were fucking before we got married. He didn't need to get worked up to, you know, where you didn't need to have somebody rub your toe, rub your feet. The phone cannon party was right there. You know, that was it. This responsive desire is a cope for fuck's sake. Stop it. Work on real arousal. Work on real desire. Work on real attraction. I got this really great. I forget, oh, I know who it was. It was, here it is. Okay. I'm going to give her a shout out because I've been following this chick on Twitter and on Instagram. She followed me and then I followed her back. She does, probably does only fans. It's like, the only thing I ever see her in is lingerie. So, sorry.

That's what she does, but she has some really good quotes here now, here and then. And one of the things she was saying, so we were talking about like responsive desire and all this other bullshit. One of the things she posted recently was attraction means that she's drawn to you. There's an attraction there. I kind of disagree with that, but okay, let's just go with it. Drawing to you. Then she says, desire equals I want you. Okay. But I agree with it. I want to fuck you. I have a desire to, genuine desire to actually want to fuck this guy. Okay. My body responds to you. That okay, definitely so. Okay, got it. Okay. And then there's chemistry. Chemistry is something that happens between us. There's some one to start getting going. And then there's the chemistry between you. Some people can have a roulosal, they can have attraction, everything, but there's no chemistry there. Then the shit falls apart, which or coral would probably agree with that assessment. Now the last thing she said is this is, and by the way, her name is Alexia Charis. Alexia Charis. Filipino girls. She actually pretty attractive. But anyways, long story short, the last thing

she says is this, she says, all of this overlaps, but it's not, but they are not the same. Okay? Nowhere on that list, nowhere in that, that, that chain of, of events is their responsive desire. I've got to feel like I'm into it. I've got to work me. It's always fucking like, how do I pick the lock? She won't fuck me. Okay, well, you got to use a different lock pick. You got to get in there and somehow I'm going to make this fucking work. It's like sex should not be a picking locks. I should be, I, I, this is the one kind of conversation I usually get into with, with coral is why the fuck is it that women have to make sex into a fucking calculus equation to fuck you? Now, I got this one. This is, this is the last video I'm going to show you today, but this is, I thought this was really crazy good. I'm going to get to Arthur Brooks at some point.

Oh, not the way. Okay, here we go. Is this the one? Yes. Okay. So this was the, this was the video that I had in mind when I was, when I was kind of contemplating, quote unquote responsive desire. I'm just exhausted. I just want to like, read and go to bed. Okay. This is really going to hurt your marriage long term. Where did you come from? That's not what's important. What's important is the distance that's going to grow in your relationship if you keep rejecting your husband's pursue. I know, but I'm like exhausted right now. Girl, I get it. Being tired at the end of a long day is real, but sometimes I have to ask a different question. Not just what do I feel like doing right now, but instead, what is this choice going to produce in my relationship? Because intimacy is one of those ways that my husband feels so loved and connected within the marriage. And so sometimes what's far more profitable for the relationship is not what

I could do to get a little bit of extra sleep now, but rather choosing to love him because of what that's going to produce for both of us tomorrow. I shouldn't have to do something if I don't want to. I'm definitely not saying that you have to do anything like sex should never be forced, but I want to even challenge you to think about that language. Why is it that when you think about loving your husband, engaging in this beautiful act of intimacy together, that you hear it as a half-two? What if you reframed that saying, this is something that I get to do to both make my husband feel loved, but also to generate this incredible connection that I then get to enjoy in my marriage overall? This is the fucking calculus equation. There's more to this video. It's very long. This is essentially her explaining to herself all these reasons why she should fuck her husband who by the way is a lunchbox. The guy should like, you want to know why she's not into you because you look like you're a fat fuck. That's why if that's her, who knows, I might

hope that's her husband just laying around in bed with, does the guy bear some responsibility for her arousal? Abso fuck and loot leave. Women would not have to come up with bullshit like responsive desire if the guy was in shape and was on his game, right? What I'm saying is this is like, why is it that women have to just have to turn, figuring out why they don't want to fuck their husbands into a trigonometry equation? It's almost like, you know, it's funny is what gets me about stuff like this is that it's kind of like how gamma males will make lists like excel spreadsheets. Here's why I'm the perfect boyfriend because I do these things because I have a good family because I have a degree and because I'm going somewhere in life and because I, you know, pay my taxes and and I go to church on Sundays and I do these things and women still fuck the bad boy. They still want to, they don't have anything to do with a gamma male who buy every metric should be the perfect,

I will never betray you, I will never cheat on you, I will be invested in the children, I will do my best to make as much money as I possibly can, I will do all these things, all this laundry list, every bit of your expectations, I know what they are and I'm going to try, if I don't already meet them then I'm going to try to meet them as much as I can and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, you know what she said? I want to fuck that guy. The guy who doesn't meet any of these criteria, I'm going to go fuck that guy in this, in a foam cannon party. I want, I want the hot Brazilian helicopter pilot. What movie? I want to have sex with a guy who's a fun, who's a roller coaster, who's the bad boy, clean in, right? He'll tell Sheryl Sandberg said, I should, why, why shouldn't I, you know, take that and carry it over into a marriage. And now it's like, I don't really find this guy arousing attractive, but he keeps, he's a sex, you never become a sex pest for your, for your wife, okay? But she's got to say, well, it's going to make him feel good and you have this intimacy and blah, the Bible says you should do this and here's the thing as well. Now instead of having

long drawn out like doctoral thesis, service, masters, dissertation about why you should convince yourself into having sex with a guy that you don't really want to have sex with and you're not going to have sex with at the end of the dissertation anyways. So why are you going through all of this? I got a better idea. Let's just call it responsive desire. That's not how men, women just don't respond the same way as guys do bullshit. You respond to Alan Rich and taking his shirt off and fucking reach your trust me, right? Like, you're good. There's a reason why grandma wanted to go see aquaman and it's not because she's a fan of the DC comic. There's a, there's a reason why, there's a reason why what is it? Morning glory milking for her. It's a very popular zino porn book right now. There's a, there's a reason for that. I'm trying to figure it out. I'll tell you right now. It's not because the Minotaur was just giving her back rubs and was trying to warm her up with responsive desire, okay? That doesn't exist in that rule. And when women fantasize about guys,

they're not fantasizing about the guy that's going to rub their feet and make them feel better to try to work her up to, you know, try to pick her locks. It's the guy that she doesn't have, she the locks are already open. She's ready to fucking go. And there's no fucking responsive desire. And I just have to point this out is like the only time I hear the term responsive desire or whatever the fuck there would be something else we'll call it sooner or later. The only reason we even talk about that is because married women came up with it. I don't want to fuck my husband. Well, it must be because we don't, we're not on the same wavelength. Some women just always have her rubs. No, no, no, no. You had a rousal before or you got married and you have no arousal after you got married. Either he could be his fault. I'm not saying it might not be. Maybe the guy let himself go. Maybe he was better shape and you had fun fucking him before you got married. And then he fattened up, but it became a lunch box. Okay. I would have more respect for you as a wife. I don't want to fuck him. And it's not responsive

desires because he needs to go fucking drop 50. He needs to get down to fucking, you know, 8% body fat. I don't know whatever the fuck it is. They won't say that because that would mean that they would have to actually get in shape too. They would have to actually, well, if I'm asking him to go drop down to 10% body fat, I got to go do it too. And I don't really want to do that. So it's about responsive desire. Or it's about women convincing themselves or gaslighting themselves into having sex with a guy that their husbands, a guy who they simply have no arousal for. Attraction draws them in. Desire is I want to fuck them, right? Arousal or track and then arousal is my body responding to that, right? And then what else does she say? Then there is, okay, mystery. Then where are so? So any of those, I remember as Alexio Charis, not a sexologist, but probably could be one on the internet. I like this definition. I like the way she writes. Maybe I

would change things up a little bit, but there's a chain in all of that, right? Attraction, desire, arousal. And then chemistry, right? And then again, those aren't, I know I'm setting them up in a row, but those overlap. See what I'm saying? So it could be, you could just simply go from attraction to arousal to let's get into the chemistry part, right? Which is usually how it works. You go, Lord knows, you know, I've been in this industry for quite some time. I know the signs of just straight up desire and arousal. I know the other ones is like, is it worth playing a game for? You know? I mean, you could go with the Alan Roger Curry, you know, but many of you live game players, right? And I just mean she's not, she's not, she's not DTF. Okay, well, how do I get her to be DTF? Well, I tell you, it's not, it's not back rubs. It's head scratch is actually, head scratchers will do a work every time. That's advanced game. I'm not going to tell you about that, because that's too much. That's a very, that's a $5,000 course to learn how to give the perfect

head scratch. You want a woman to fall in love with you. You have to master the art of the head scratch. But anyways, I just wanted to point out that I'm seeing this responsive desire, responsive desire, which is basically you got to warm yourself up to it and at the same time, you got the woman trying to convince herself that she wants to have sex with this guy and she would, she would be better off having sex with him because not because everything but duty sex, not so because the Bible says to is because you're going to have to be more intimate and you're going to, it's going to make his day and you're going to make him feel better. And I love how like they're trying to convince themselves to have sex with the guy, but the resistance that that chick's going to run into is going to be like, well, why should, why should she be, why should she care about his pleasure? Why should she do anything specifically for the express pleasure of a guy? He's the one that needs to be doing stuff and he does, he probably needs to lose some weight. But that's instead of trying to

to make complex videos of these very, you know, just that women have to untangle for themselves. I mean, let me explain to you rationally why you should be fucking your husband. It's just like the gamma male saying, let me explain to you why you should be fucking me and not the bad boy drummer. You can't tell, like I was, I think it was Vox, Vox Day who was saying like, when women encounter gamma male guys, they, they feel this uncontrollable urge or this just, it comes out and nowhere, this urge to punch the guy in the face and they can't tell you why they have that sort of impulse. Well, the reason is is because the guy is trying to reason the girl into bed. Here's my Excel spreadsheet as to why you should fuck me, right? Now you got the woman doing exactly the same thing. Here's this big, long, complex reason as to why you should want to fuck me. Oh, yeah, give me that one. Bring that up. Drop that. You can drop it in assets if you want. That's fine. Oh, my God.

Who did that? Did you just do that? Oh, man, I'm using that. That's going to be the next, that's the next thumbnail. Okay, Kyle just made my next thumbnail. Here it is. This is my next, this is my, that's, that's us, that's us, that's us, that's that bell air. That's me a bell air. Hi guy, the phone can, party. And maybe, but, but, but, but why does he keep talking about that? Because that was me, although I didn't have a bandana back then. That's fucking awesome. Okay, I got to give you a plug. I got it. We got to pay the bills here for a second. I'm doing a beauty pageant. Can you, no, I'm actually not doing a baby. I'm actually sponsoring a pageant. I'm not doing an actual beauty pageant. Nobody wants to see me. So here's my, here's my thing. We're going to be doing this at, let's see, when is this going to be a rig night, a very nice sponsoring, a beauty pageant in Vegas over Halloween weekend. So it'd be a Halloween thing. It's going to be, let's see, this is my, from my rig night program. I'm sorry, I have to read this because I just got this from Joe like about five minutes before

I came into the studio today. And inviting a small, we're only inviting a very small group of guys to the, we've talked about this already. We're inviting small group of guys. So you're going to talk to women on this weekend. We're specifically trying to make this more nuts and bolts, right? So we want to be able to sort of give you the tools. This is like a, this is like a education. It's more of a, it's a, it's a personality game building workshop for guys who are, like I said, in our demographic. Okay. So you're going to talk to women this weekend. We usually have women come in and have like mock conversations and stuff. I think we're one of the only groups that actually does this like well with any, any salt, right? Okay. So you're going to have real ones. More of them than you've talked to in the last year. And you're not standing in nightclub at 1 a.m. with the lights on with the lights and the noise and her guard already up. You're going to start in a room where talking is expected. This is one of the exercises that we do. Okay. This is actually the most, one of the most popular aspects of our reignite program. We've done this with several of

our members already. And so we're kind of expanding upon this whole, the operation, right? The exercises here. We're going to be with, let's say with expected with two coaches and a wing girl right next to you, telling you what's actually landing. Okay. By the time you're out on Halloween night, you're already done and you've done this 10 times and it's not a leap anymore. It's just what you know. Now we're trying to get to the point like when we talk about doing game, we talk about helping guys sort of like reaccompanate themselves or reintegrate themselves into the modern sexual marketplace. This is part of that deal. And it's it's it's part of the internalization process. I think one of the things that were guys kind of lose the, lose the narrative when they're out is it's easy to put together an event where it's like, okay, I'm going to get a bunch of girls there. We're going to all show up. But once you get there, it's like, what do you do then? Right? I like social circle game. I think it's probably it's far better than any other form of game there is.

And I will 100% endorse everything that Mike says about that. However, there's also the part that once you're there and once you're in the social circle, you still have to have some sort of game. You still have the approach. You still have to be able to carry on a conversation. So this is this whole weekend is going to be a technical skills kind of weekend. And like I said, and then the other part is this is that it's specifically catered for guys who are a little bit older coming out of coming out of a relationship, coming out of a marriage or like you're just simply trying to update your skills to get to a point. You're not getting what you want. So we're updating skills. So it's really kind of a skill building thing as well. And so we got that going on. We have a we've built a step by step system that gets a man from zero conversations with women to comfortable and natural in four days. Four days. Jesus Christ. What are you doing? Oh, that one in the middle. Let's see that one right there. Give me that one. I definitely you got to send me. Well, send me all of these. But I would show that one in the middle. Do that. Yeah, bring that one in the

middle. All right. So. All right. So I just want to point that out. This is coming up on the windows. The weekend that it's going to be. Okay. If you have any questions about this, I'm always available for questions on this. It's going to be, I think we're calling it a pageant immersion, right? So there's going to be there is I think it's a see there. Is it a costume contest or is it a bikini contest? I'm really sure. Anyways, we have this coming up. Oh, here it is. Okay. Got the dates. Here it is. It's October 29th to November 1st. So that's going to be on Halloween. God, it's that a weekend. That's a weekend. Halloween weekend. That's going to be when we're doing this. Okay. So we got that coming up very soon. If you need pricing or you want more information on that, you can go to the reignite link. And then that'll send you on to Joe Marin and Joe will explain to you the details about it. But it is a,

it's an intensive. So it's going to be more folk. We're not, I mean, we're going to go out and do fun shit. Don't get me wrong. But like it's we're we're not going out on deep sea fishing on this one. This is all business on this one. This is going to teach you skills. So if you have questions, just hit the link for the reignite right there. And that will take you to Joe. Now the other thing, the last thing I need to talk to you about the last announcement I have is this is that the rational male engine is fucking amazing, man. Just god damn it, man. I think it's like has so exceeded my expectations. And I didn't have like crazy expectations to begin with, but like they're pretty good. And we have, we've got, I'm like, I can't give you accurate member counts right now because they've been growing since the last time I had a conversation with my devs. But the here's the thing is we're going to do a second version of it. We're going to do a 2.0 because we always have to update and we're already have enough input from you guys, which thank you fucking very much

for all the input to the point where we made this kind of command decision to do a 2.0. So it's if you're already in it's all you won't even notice it. It's just we're updating the we're updating the engine to the 2.0 version. Why are we doing this? I'm going to explain to you why. So here's a reason why is when guys have guys, I don't know if it's myself one guys have been asking certain questions or they're trying to get like a specific answer from the engine. And then like my engine like me digital me says so it gives you some some information. And then you're like well, I don't really agree with that. I don't understand why this is like that. And I this is kind of like I don't see that in my own life or something. When there's some kind of pushback from the user, the problem is and this is true of like all all engines, a chat GPT, GROC, Gemini, even for Plexigee, if you push back in any way, it will apologize. It will it will say well because those engines are meant to keep

the user on the platform. And I want people to keep the user on the platform. That by the way, there's a it's like a failsafer. It's a guardrail that's built into all of those engines. If the if the user gives any kind of pushback or any kind of criticism or is saying you're wrong or whatever else, the the engine is meant to say well, I hadn't really thought of it that way. Maybe you're right. Right. And it's especially annoying in my case because guys are talking about intersectional dynamics. So when the engine says when you say something about men and women's nature or this and I agree with this, I don't agree with that and I agree with this. It might give you back some waxy kind of response because it wants to keep you on the platform. I don't want to keep you on the platform. I saw this and I was just like, I don't want this to be the default. I want to take that guardrail out. I want to make sure that it's not defaulting to whatever it thinks the general answer should be because that's what these other engines do. If you ask those same questions to like chat GPT, it's going to it's going to try to like placate you. It's going to try to pander to

you because it wants to keep you on the platform. So if I say, well, I see men and women as this way, right? Well, yeah, you're probably right about that. You should treat women with respect and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, right? This like something that's completely uncharacteristic of what I would say like on this show or whatever else. And so we made the decision to take those guardrails out. The problem with that and I just came to discover this recently. I had no idea this existed. But there's a certain algorithm. There's certain part of the algorithm that is part of those guard rails that has to be installed into the engine if you want to sell or you want to make your your engine or your AI product. If you want to make that downloadable from Apple Ice Store, if you want to download it from Apple, it has to say if it doesn't have that, they won't, they'll, they'll, they'll do qualified from being able to get it off of Apple. Now, the reason why I thought, hey, I don't care about that. I might lose some people on the actual, you know,

the phone on the phone app, right? You'll still be able to use it standard online, obviously. But if you have the phone app, you won't be able to download it from Apple because we don't have that specific like rule set or that line of code or whatever we're supposed to have in there that gives you the sort of pandering, placating answers if you push back, right? Because they don't want the, they don't want GROC, they don't want chat GPT or Gemini to like upset the user by giving him an answer, giving that person an answer that may or may not be something that they, that they agree with, they won't challenge the user. I want to challenge the user. So I might not be able to distribute the app, the phone app via Apple, I store or whatever it is or the Apple store. If that's the case, Android's no problem. From, Android's like the rumble of the apps, right? You can get it on Android, Android could give a shit, right? So probably have to find a way to read,

to distribute it. I might not have to worry about it anyways because Apple doesn't like Manosphere Redpill shit anyhow. So I won't put in all likelihood whether it's install, or it's not, I'm probably not going to be able to distribute it on via the Apple store, right? Oh well. So, but I think it's worth it to challenge, to actually do the opposite of what every other fucking LLM does and challenges the user when it's like, well, I think men and women are like this, well, I'm going to explain to you why you're wrong. And be a diplomatic and polite, I'm going to say, you're, it gets because you're a fucking idiot. That's not what I'm going to say, obviously. But to the point where we don't have to have it, so require some major recoding on part of my devs, and they were the ones that brought this up to me and they said, I don't think this is, like if there's some pushback that this is not really answering like you, when I go, yeah, I kind of notice that. And so now we're taking that out. So in the 2.0 version, that's going to be gone. Because I'm not going to, I'm not going to have, if I have one goal in this project,

it's not to make money. It's to challenge the users, to put people on, to tell people that what they might not want to hear, but they need to hear or read, however it is. So, that's coming up very soon. That change will come up. I'll let you guys know because they're working on it this week. So it's going to take a little bit of time to do it. But I'm willing to sacrifice, I'm willing to chance that I'm not going to be able to distribute it on the Apple Store versus telling you the truth, not pandering to you. I'm going to, I respect my users and respect you guys and respect my readers and anybody who follows me, I respect you enough not to, to sugarcoat shit, not to pander to you. I will, that's, I solemnly swear, I will never pander to you. I'm just going to tell you what you, what I think you need to hear and what I think is going to be beneficial not only to you, but just to like your relationships and everything else that goes along with it because the more we pander, the more we get shit like Lindsey Clancy, the more we pander, the more we can't complain about, well, you know, men did nothing.

Oh, guess what? I'm going to try to make my little small contribution by saying, you know what? I'm not going to have that little, whatever that widget is. That's installed in the code. That's in my AI. That's a good place. It seems a good place is any to start for me. So I respect my users enough to want to be able to do that. So that's coming up very soon. So if you've been using it by the way and you've noticed that, thank you for telling me. First of all, because it came from users saying this, this is the feedback that we got. As I said, the engine is your engine. It's mine. I'm doing it's my voice, obviously, but it's the only uniquely red pill, Mattisphere engine in existence right now. And it's cheap as fuck to it. It's 16 bucks. And let me explain to you something else. I specifically made it $16. Here's the other issue me in the devs head. We have so many people who want to or just doing the free version because you get a certain amount of questions for we want you to try it out kind of thing, right? And you get a certain amount of them per day. It's between three and five, depending on the whoever it is, right?

Let's just say it's five. Okay. These guys have the I swear to God, I've seen the conversations like so. These guys have these conversations up to five response five, five queries, five responses, right? What they will do is once they get to that point, they will copy and paste all of that shit. And then they will go and create a new email address. And then they will re register on the engine pasted in all of the all the previous conversations and continue on for another five and then start the whole process all over again. Okay. That's annoying as fuck, but I am flattered that you find my stuff so fucking engaging that you would try to avoid $16 a month to create God knows how many proxy email accounts just because you're getting that much good, you're getting that much good material out of it. Would it not be better? And granted some of these are in Kenya and Pakistan and everything else, would it not be better to just

simply kick down 16 bucks? Maybe that's a lot of money in those countries. I don't know. We tossed around that idea too, like making it like $8 in Pakistan or I'm like, no, I don't fuck that. Everybody pays the same fucking thing. If these guys are that like devoted to my material, you can find out about like, like, if I saved you from a bad divorce, is that worth $16 or is that worth? I don't know, 10 grand that you would have had to pay for it. I mean, there's, I mean granted it's figurative. I can't say exactly. It's going to be 10 grand, but like, but I would say this if I helped you out of a bad situation, was that worth 16 bucks? I think so. So there you go about that. Let's say what did you say? If it says something I'm wrong about, the mechanic, there it is. If it says something I'm wrong about, the mechanics or being a pussy, I'd rather be told I'm wrong or being a pussy and then panned or two. So I can feel good for five minutes. It's really, it's really good. Thank you. It's fucking amazing. The more

I, and I get to use it as from the dev side of it and I get to see all the shit that's going on, which is how I know about like the multiple, and by the way, multiple people are making multiple proxy accounts. So we're going to change that. It's going to be based on IP. So you're only going to be able to ask those five questions on that one IP and then it's one into five and done. Probably should have seen this one. Nobody's going to do that. No, they will. That's how autistic my mind by, yeah, yes, my, some of them are, it's like the, it's like these guys we ban in the chat. And then they go, I'm going to go make another YouTube account just so I can give them a piece of my mind. Wow. Dude, life is fucking short, man. I'm not that important. Right. I want to ask you that where they are. Is there anybody like, in off the top of your head, is there anybody you can think of who you would fanboy for? Like you would be starstruck by. Oh, be honest, no, not anymore. After I like grew up right around like 18, 19, 20 into that range, I stopped caring or idolizing other people.

I was just reading a thing on, I was actually, it was on a podcast. Well, who was it? They were talking about how there are certain parts of your brain that are predispose you to fanboying or to, to hero worship kind of thing because the way that it works out is this. And I thought, finally, this was fascinating because I think there's a lot of red pill applications for this. But it's, there's parts of your brain like, because we were, we were, we evolved in hunter-gatherer tribes that were no larger than 100 to 150 at the time. And so you had to know people in your tribe by name, by face, and by vocal, like by how the way they sounded, right? And so now they've done these, they've done these experiments, oh, with like their MRI studies or FMRI studies, the guys and women too. And they will show a picture of Jennifer Aniston amongst 80 other pictures of random people, right? So they'll show Jennifer Aniston and then maybe twice,

maybe three times amongst 80 pictures of just random faces. When Jennifer Aniston's picture is shown, there's a very specific, it's below the conscious, it's like the lizard brain part of the brain that lights up the synaptic nerve that lights up when you see Jennifer Aniston. Because everybody, if you've seen friends, if you, if you know who Jennifer Aniston is, it's very specific. Then they show like other celebrities and other parts of that same area light up. There are literally custom like individual neurons or combinations of neurons that are representative of that celebrity, of that person. And there could be their girlfriend, it could be the wife, it could be your kids and stuff too. It's not just celebrities and stuff. So they called they called it the the the Aniston neuron exactly native to Jennifer Aniston. But it's not just the picture. It's also if I say Jennifer Aniston lights up. If you, if you read the name Jennifer Aniston

pops up, right? There, there are specific neurons or combinations of like synaptic nerve that light up per that individual, right? And it goes back to the concept of paraso social relationships. Now that's something that's a little bit new, but I think it was the concept was like in the 1950s, 59, I believe it was. But the idea because TV was becoming a big deal back then, right? And so people felt like they knew the person that was on the TV show like Walter Cronk. People had like back in the movies talking about Vietnam, right? People felt like they had a relationship. They didn't know who he was, but they felt like if they met the guy in person, they'd be able to carry on the conversation with the guy. I don't know the fuck you are, right? But, but there's that that familiarity that goes along with it now, that was just in the age of television. Now, because we have like you're seeing me right now, if you see my face, there's some fucking neuron and I'm living, literally living rent free in your fucking brainstem right now because you've watched enough for

Ashland, Mal and you like I know who you are. I know what your tone is. Everybody knows you too. So, I thought that was fascinating. I really kind of want to explore the, I mean, it's the article or the actual piece was about paraso social relationships, but there's a biological aspect to paraso social relationships. Why do we do those things? Well, because when you were in a hunter gatherer tribe of the hundred and 150 people, you had to know who was who, who was a badass, who was the best hunter, who was the best gatherer, who was the guy who was crazy, who was the the old. The eternal hire. Yeah, so there's like that, you know, who's the elder of the tribe, those kinds of things. There's like so in each one of them, and we had the brain space to do that. But now, because we live in a global engagement media society, we are literally, it's literally taking up so much of, and so when, when people see Lindsey Clancy or something like that, they, one of the reasons why those bitches in the courtroom are so emotionally invested in that is because they think that they

literally, biologically, they think that they know her, that if they met her, they will be able to carry on a conversation, and she will be able to carry on the conversation back with them because of that. And so it's fascinating to me, because that's not evolutionary psychology, that's evolutionary biology right there. And as I've said before, it's not going to necessarily be evosythe, which is going to play a big part, but the, but evolutionary biology will prove more red pill points than anything else. And I really think that the, I'm going to explore this a little bit more about pair of social relationships pretty soon, but it's just, it's especially the Jennifer Anson thing. I really blew me away, because you got to figure there's probably some porn stars that you're like a little special neurons that go, Oh, look, it's let's brandy love. It's Tiffany Fox. There's probably somebody there, right? Probably something in there. So, so when people say that you actually have like a, you're, you're living rent free and that person's head, you literally are living rent free. Oh, my god. Here we go. I'm living rent free and all these

bitches. That's the best one, right? There was the other ones. Did you put the other ones in there? Dude, I have so many. Oh, my god. These are at least the sparks, for example. She lives rent free and all of you guys has had for some reason. I have no idea. Yeah. Isn't that crazy? Fuckin' ain't. All right, let me get to these and we'll get out of here. What do you got here? Rollo, since they are susceptible to divorce coaching and forensic astrology, what forensic astrology? I'm going to use that with Mike. Hey, Mike. Introduce me as forensic. I have forensic astrologists. How to keep the beanie in there. Yes. This is for Ned's College Fund. Thank you very much for that. Ned appreciates it. You know, I had to take Anna to the vet this week because she, she, she had a neck injury and it's my damn fault because when I lived in Reno, we had like sliding glass door and she like, this is when we first got her. She runs around like she was seriously. She's

doing fast and she hit the, she hit the sliding glass door and like she has had us like, she comes and goes, it flares up every now and then flared up and I was just like, we got to get her some car proffin or something like that. I worry about her because like any time a dog like yelps or is like does anything out of the ordinary. I think automatically think it's osteo. It's honestly. I'm so cool. Have you seen the thing that they're giving dogs BP 157 TV 5? You know, they come to think of it. That might not be such a bad idea. All right. Let's see. Sir, Mr. Jason, just to be frank, Scruc Scott Galloway, he's a hypocrite. He's a catalyst, cosplaying, a liberal. Yeah, we're going to do something about those guys here pretty soon. Modern human humans are so hebristic. They, to think that they can change 100,000 years of genetics and evolutionary adaptation because of feelings. Yes. Well, here's the thing is like again, I realize I was coming out. What is his name about hypergamy and and and phara and everything who by the way still doesn't have any lenses in those classes. You're dealing with a child like she's of course she doesn't understand

that. Well, did you listen to her to speak with what they're talking with with destiny? I mean, probably allegedly fuck destiny for crying out loud. If you don't know those things, you just simply don't know those things. But even if you didn't, you're, look at her. You're talking about a clip from three and a half years ago. Like at least you're something recent. Like come and get me going to Kate Willett and just pull out some fresh. Go grab something out of there so I can like run you over the colds for that. Thanks to GoFundMe, she has more money than most women have in retirement. She's got more money than my retirement right now. I can tell you that. Am I the only one who saw hypergamy in high school? So obvious there was no money involved in high school or go the alpha side. Yes. Something I was saying to Rolo while ago. Yeah. Oh, that's that you're you're you're goddamn right. Well, what about one of the first things I was talking to you about. Like if you're looking at if you look at the the timeline here from this is from

preventative medicine from my second book. When you're looking at like I started at 15 you could start at 18 if you want. I started at 15 because that's usually when boys and girls start taking interest in each other in high school. Shut the fuck up. I'm not suggesting you fuck under age girls. Okay. That's that. But you look at it. The reason why I said alpha short term from like 15 all the way up to about 23 years old is because it usually doesn't like there's no frame of reference like the the hot chicks in high school want to get with the jocks. They want to get with the quarterback of the football team. They want to get with the guy who's like got some sort of some kind of rite. I know where the fuck you status right. Social circle works. It's not because of money. It's not because of socioeconomic. I mean, unless you're going to Beverly Hills high school and even then it probably doesn't because everybody's on the same footing, right? Like it's like it's so simple. It's so fucking simple. That's the thing about like dual mating strategies. Like you don't have to come up with some convoluted bullshit about makeswitching hypothesis.

No, it's that is that is like that is like easily disproven. Even what is it? Was it social matching theory or what is it a sort of mating? Right. Sort of mating probably worked when we had a regulated sexual marketplace. Yeah. But now you want to know who's moving the goalposts. It's people who are clinging to the religion of a sort of mating because they're like want to say, well, we've tracked this for a long time. Well, you're you're looking at like versus like. But if you go and you track that from say like the 1965 up to now, I will guarantee you that you it's going to confound all with all the results that you had prior to that. And then they'll say, well, you know, rich people, marriage people. Well, again, you're using marriage is the litmus test. You lose like so marriage is the confirmation. That's not a confirm marriage is not a confirmation of a sexual strategy. What you do to get to the marriage, that could be a sexual strategy. That could be a mating strategy.

Right. But afterwards just it's like it's putting the cart before the horse. It's it's it's it's what's what's called harking, right? It's hypothesizing after results are known. Okay. They have the results and they go, okay, it must be this. But that's not what you were testing for. That's not what you're experimenting for. But because you have those results, then you're going to hypothesize over those results. That's not how the met that's that's bad methodology. You have to test for what it is that you're trying to get. Okay. So you can do all these things. We're going to compare married people with this and rich people and poor people and now what you're doing things socioeconomically. And then here's the other part that confounds all of this shit. Why is the marriage rate 5.8 per 1,000 right now the lowest it's ever been? Are are are people still hooking up because they're you know, well rich people are like guys who are very wealthy men tend to very tend to marry or tend to be married. Well, the the way they pitch this is they say if you get married, you will be a you or go like a cause and effect like it's not a correlation. It's a causation or they want

to pitch it as a causation. Get married equals you're going to make money equals you're going to be happy. No, you're not because I because happiness is a proximate outcome, not an ultimate outcome. And everybody who's pitching happiness as being some reason to get married is selling you something. They want the thing that gets me about this was and I've seen this so many times especially recently and Rob Henderson is on board with this Wilcox is on Brad Wilcox is on board with this anybody telling you well married even Arthur Brooks just said this recently. I think he was taught he was either Bill Mahery's talking to somebody was interviewed to say well married men tend to be happier they're happier. So if you're not married, you're going to be on that's the correlation you're supposed to make. If you're not married, you're going to be unhappy. Says who? And where the where's the stats? Where's the data on this? Even I think PPD was even talking about this. You're going to be happy or if you're married. Show me the stats, show me the

experiments, show me the methodology, show me who you pulled. They don't. They just say you're going to be happier if you're married. Okay. Well the thing is is that presumes that happiness is an ultimate outcome. It is not it is an old it is a proximate outcome. Proveably a proximate outcome. Happiness is not something you are. It is something you do. It's in the process. That's it. You want to talk about you want to talk about contentment and all this other stuff. We can have that but then you get into the that you get into the philosophical. Now they're selling this to you because they think that because they think, well we got to tell these guys to get married. We got to save the Western culture. So we got to tell these guys to man up and be better and become eligible bachelor become marriageable. Why? Well because you're going to be happier if you do. No, you're not going to be because happiness is something you do. You have a fundamental misunderstanding like distorted understanding of what the fuck happiness really is and they've been selling this forever for the longest fucking time like it's a religion. You will

go to heaven if you get married because that's what happiness is. It's contentment. That's what they're trying to fucking sell you. So just throwing that one out there. Where's the last ones here? Get to this. Okay, hypercrumbs still. Okay, and let's see. The God of the Purrs right again. You've got them right. I'm right again. All right, and where we go? I kind of get to rest. It's college fun and per-provide and per-provides. They provide dog food. Actually, farmers dog food gives them provides. The first rule of hypergamy is you do not talk about hypergamy. Make it. And Metallica or Megadeth? Okay, go shoot. It's kind of hard because I listened to Metallica first before Megadeth going up. But I'm going to have to go with Megadeth. I'm going with Megadeth as well. You know why? Because Dave Mustaine never sold out. Okay, and I'm sorry. Dave Mustaine still doing the same shit.

We are all living in the atmosphere now. Yes, you are correct about that, sir. We need to make that a sound, drop. When is the next book coming out? Okay, well, glad you asked here at the end of the show. I am almost done with the hardback. I'm waiting to get approval back from Amazon. So the hardback of the reissue or the, let's say, the updated version of the first book, the coming out very soon. I'm going to release it in hardback and softback. But it content-wise, nothing's changed. But the syntax, it's a little easier to read. I've kind of tightened up the language a little bit better. So I'm not using $10 words all the time. But it's essentially the same content. Bigger type. So you can read it better. It's going to be a bigger book because I made the content or made the typeface bigger. But nothing's really going to change content-wise in it. Like I said, it's going to be a little easier to read. All of the spelling errors and typos are all been taken care of. Hardbacks coming out first. Then the update of the software, the paperbacks

coming out after that. Then I have the Maxim's book that's hot on the trails. I'm going to try to get the Maxim's book out before the end of November. So right around the holidays, I should have the Maxim's book out. Because that's really easy. It's a really easy right. So that will be coming. It's going to be a small book. It's going to be about the size of like preventive medicine. So that'll be the next one that's coming out. It will be the rational male Maxim's. And then I have a work of fiction that's coming out. And I'll tell you guys all about that as soon as I am. As soon as I am at liberty to explain it. Because people keep it. Like Orion Stone has been doing fiction for a while now. And he does it very well. He likes the cyber punk genre. And he does it very, very well. Mine's a little bit different than that. So we'll see how things go. But anyways guys, thanks for watching No Access Vegas this Wednesday. But do go check out the Kate Willett show. It's just dropped today. Kate Willett, K-A-I-T-W-I-L-E-T-T. That's the first one on her show right now.

Very good interview. As soon as the new show with Trey Crowder drops, you'll be the first to know I'll let you know about that. And do go check out the rational male engine. The links in the thing is just the rational male engine.com. And go ask some questions and give us some feedback because that's how we get to 2.0. And that's how we're going to get to 3.0. I want it to be perfected because you guys made it perfect for me. So go check out the rational male engine. Also, don't forget, reignite. We're going to be doing our intensive or immersive. That's going to be over the holiday of the Halloween weekend, which will be October 29th through November 1st. So that's coming up very soon. I'll have more information soon about that. I think I might even do a standalone video just so everybody questions and answers. We'll just do a Q&A about it. So anyways, guys, hopefully this was, I hope this was pretty informational. I think it was. I stuck to all of my outline this time. So I didn't freestyle too much. All right, guys, thanks for watching. I'll see you

guys next week. Bye-bye. Gene! Anyway

That's ir regulate one until It's kind of卡unfoq I think it's EHM They're all behind the scenes Why don't you hear what is screaming my name? That's nasty. It is nasty, right? Isn't it nasty? Uh-huh. She was swinging in the bedroom. All the top stoppin' and slurvin' with the head. Like she's caught in your car, Lee. Mm-hmm. Well, I'm a whore. Yeah. Yeah. What made you think I was all be up and down? I'm a party. Turn it never so again, I see.

Working up and down in your body. Do I gotta do something now, do I gotta do something? Turn it never so again, I see. That's nasty, that's nasty, that's nasty. Good day, sir. Good day, sir. Good day, sir. Proceeding podcasting with the production of V. Russian L. All rights reserved. Registered trademark 2026. You don't steal. Ned stuff.

Say my name. Stop the cab. It's time to get out. It may be thinking we can't for me. It's time to make me one more kid. Whatcha gonna tell me we're more kids. I'll keep you alive. It may be like you're talking to me. It's time to make it thinking we can't for me. It's time to make me one more kid. I'll keep you alive. I'll keep you alive. Oh, those guys are back. FBI, overlapped. We say to give a woman vote is like to let a monkey fly a plane. Very dangerous.

You know, the big term of 2024 Anderson is the man of spear. And we're all living in the man of spear now.

More episodes

More from The Rational Male

View all episodes →