Loading...
Loading...

You're tracking your food, hitting the gym, doing everything right. Then your period shows up and the scale jumps 3 pounds overnight.
Should you "cycle sync" your diet? Should you just ignore it as "water weight" fluctuations? Or are both approaches missing what works?
This episode covers why weight loss stalls around your cycle and what to do about it, whether your periods are predictable or all over the place.
You'll hear the actual research on how much water weight your cycle adds (it's less than you've been told), why cycle syncing your nutrition and training has almost support in the research, and what happens psychologically when you see the scale spike during PMS.
The real problem isn't the water weight. It's that misleading scale data during your most emotionally reactive window triggers the exact behaviors that stall fat loss.
The fix is a measurement system that filters hormonal noise and a simple nutrition shift that works with your biology instead of against it. If you're over 40, in perimenopause, or dealing with unpredictable cycles, you'll learn why the standard advice won't work and what to do instead.
Join the Eat More Lift Heavy waitlist to get first access and founder pricing on a 26-week coached program that integrates strength training and nutrition coaching together, with hormonal pattern awareness built in: witsandweights.com/eatmore
Timestamps
0:00 - The cycle, PMS, and weight loss question
2:56 - Two bad advice camps
5:56 - How scale fluctuations change your behavior
8:24 - Evidence regarding weight fluctuations
12:20 - Hormones, metabolism, and cycle syncing
16:56 - Does cycle syncing work (for training or nutrition)?
19:22 - Perimenopause and the measurement fix
25:11 - Phase tracking and the nutrition fix
33:42 - How to structure your diet and training
36:38 - Bonus: one-meal craving strategy
💪 Join Eat More Lift Heavy - A 6-month coaching program for lifters over 40 who are done collecting information and ready to have real human coaches watch their data and know what to focus on each week.
📱 Get Fitness Lab (exclusive 20% off) - The #1 adaptive fitness and nutrition app. Daily coaching, workouts, and biofeedback-based guidance to help you build muscle and lose fat over 40.
👥 Join our Facebook community - For adults over 40 who want to build muscle, lose fat, and stop following bad advice. Weekly Q&A threads, coaching insights, and real chat with other lifters.
👋 Ask a question or find Philip Pape on Instagram
Ladies, I've been getting a lot of questions about whether you should cycle sink your diet
or training and how to deal with your period and PMS when it comes to things like cravings
and hunger, when you're trying to lose fat. I've also heard, hey, I get a lot of fluctuations
in the scale due to water weight and maybe some other things. Today, I'm covering the real
numbers behind cycle-related weight swings. White cycle sinking has almost no real world evidence
in the literature and a measurement and nutrition framework that does work whether your cycle is
predictable or completely all over the place. And if you're in Perry, Menopause, that last part
is for you. Welcome to Whits and Wates. The show that puts a popular piece of fitness advice under
the microscope finds a hidden reason it doesn't work and gives you the deceptively simple fix
that does. I'm your host Phillip Ape and today we're talking about something that affects
roughly half the population and it gets discussed either with way too much complexity or way too
little. Your menstrual cycle, your weight and how to actually lose fat when your body seems to be
working against you every few weeks. Now, I'm recording this because over half the women I work with
report hormonal concerns as a major barrier to seeing results. And the advice that they've gotten
falls into two camps, both of which are woefully incomplete. And we're going to fix that today on
Whits and Wates. Stick around to the very end because after the episode wraps up, I'm going to
share a one meal change that can blunt your cravings before they start, whether it's from PMS, a bad
sleep night or just a high stress day. It takes five minutes and the physiology behind it is
surprisingly clean. In this episode, you will learn the actual magnitude of cycle related weight
fluctuations. Spoiler alert, it's probably less than you think. Why cycle syncing has almost no
clinical trial support and it falls apart entirely in a parimenopause. Any measurement plus nutrition
framework that you can start using this week, that filters out some of that hormonal noise from
the real fat loss progress. So let's get into it. And if you are a woman who tracks her weight, and by
the way, if men, you guys are listening to this, it really helps us as guys to understand women
and the plight of hormones and parimenopause because there is a lot going on there. And the
medical industry and the women's health domain is very incomplete at this point. So the more we can
learn the better to support our ladies, our wives, our clients, our friends, anybody who needs support,
who's asking for support and one thing as a man, I know it's to not try to fix things unless
asked. And the first thing you always want to do is listen. I hope I have that right. So if you're a
woman who tracks her weight and you've noticed that it jumps around a lot during your period or
around your period, you've probably gotten some different pieces of advice. And I'm going to
guess that it's one of two things, especially the first one is around cycle syncing. There's so
much marketing around cycle syncing everything. All right. Eat more carbs in your follicular phase,
cut back in your luteal phase, train harder in the first half of your cycle. Go lighter in the
second half. There's actually apps for this. There's courses for this entire Instagram accounts built
around color coded phase charts. And I get the appeal as a numbers guy, even though I don't have
a period myself, but it feels like you're finally, you know, working with your body. That's what we
talk about here, right? It's like, okay, listen to the signals and individualize it, personalize it,
and work with your body. The problem is the evidence doesn't necessarily support it. And we're going
to come back to that in a minute. Option two, the other thing they say is, you know, you just got to
be patient, ladies. It's your water weight. It'll pass. I mean, I've said that to some extent,
to folks that like, hey, if you have a 10 pound weight that goes up and down 10 pounds and you've
been stuck in that range, how much of that is water weight could be a lot of it. I don't know for
sure until I know you and your patterns of what's happening. But to just be told or gaslit and said,
like, well, it is just water and don't worry about the rest. Although technically true,
someone telling you, hey, just ignore it without having a framework for what to do instead so that
you can track the right things, such as, hey, let's track your actual trends over time, month over
month, and maybe compare your different cycle phases to each other to actually get rid of that noise.
Then that's like someone telling someone, you know, just live with it. That that is what it is. I
can't actually help you. And so both of these approaches, you know, like, hey, cycles in everything
or don't worry about it are obviously a failed approach because they treat the cycle as the
problem to solve. Either you micromanage it or you dismiss it. And by doing that, you're not
addressing the real issue. You're not addressing it, which is that most women don't have a system in
place for distinguishing the hormonal noise, I'll call it from say actual fat loss or fat gain
signals. And honestly, most men don't have one either. This is definitely not a gender thing. This
is a most people don't have a system. And every spike in the scale, every jump in the scale becomes
an emotional event. Do you feel me? How does that hit you? Okay. And then every time you have a
plateau, like weight loss resistance, it feels like this permanent thing. And you can never get out
of that cycle. And, you know, I'm broken or I don't know what to do going forward. And it's just
not going to work for me. Okay. And there's different flavors of that. The research shows us what
happens next, what happens next in this situation. A 2024 study tracked 50 women in a weight loss
program. And they used daily assessments. On the days when participants saw the scale go up,
they reported, guess what? More guilt, more shame, lower confidence, they were less likely to track
their food or to exercise that day. And essentially the behavioral response was immediate. And then
there was a separate analysis of the data that found that after a full week of weight regain,
participants successfully lost weight the following week, only 5% of the time, 5% of the time.
So this is what we talked about in the last episode, the what the hell effect in action.
Psychologists call it the abstinence violation effect, the abstinence violation effect,
when you perceive that you've broken your rules or you've lost your progress,
you don't only feel bad about it, you also disengage, you stop doing the things that were working.
Now, here's what matters the most for today's episode. The late luteal phase, the week or so
before your period is when the scale weight is most likely to spike up to jump from that fluid
retention. However, it's also when emotional eating vulnerability hits its peak. In other words,
you are most likely to eat emotionally while you're also most likely to gain weight from fluid.
Kind of stings, right? There was a twin study of 460 women. So twins, they looked at twins.
And they found that genetic influences on emotional eating were twice as high after ovulation
compared to before. So you're looking at a window where the scale is least reliable and at the same
time your psychological response to it is most reactive. And that combination is what often derails
the fat loss. So I didn't even realize this powerful connection until I looked into the research
for this episode. And the reason I looked into this research is because I hear this challenge all
the time literally every day with our clients and in our community. And I want to help. And this
is how we're going to do it. So today's kind of the framework for that. Obviously in our programs,
we dive deep and actually figured out for you as an individual. But that combination is a big
challenge. And it's so it's not the water weight itself. It's not your hormones. It's the interaction
between misleading data and this heightened emotional reaction. So that's a real problem.
We're going to solve today, right? Not how to hack your cycle. Not how to hack your cycle because
the evidence doesn't say that that's something that you should even try to do. But how to stop your
cycle from hacking your behavior. Oh, my drop. Okay. So we're not going to hack your cycle. Your
cycle is not the problem. You're not the problem. It's how do we stop your cycle from interfering with
your behavior? Okay. So let's talk about what the research actually shows is happening to your weight
across your cycle because the numbers matter. They matter. You know how much I love numbers and
data and math. And it helps to understand this context. The most commonly cited figure is three to
five pounds of water weight. And you'll see that everywhere. For some women who have, I'll say
clinically significant PMS. That is very accurate. But the best prospective data actually tells
something different. So stick with me. A 2023 study looked at 42 women. Twice a week,
they use bio-electrical impedance across full menstrual cycles. That's kind of the body fat scale
like the in body. Okay. And the average weight increase during menstruation was 0.45 kilograms.
So I'm switching between metric and imperial because it was reported in kilograms. So 0.45 kilograms
about one pound. And it was almost entirely accounted for by a 0.47 kilogram increase in extra
cellular water. So there was no change in fat mass or lean mass and no change in body circumferences.
So it was about one pound. That's like the median, not three to five pounds. Even though we talk
about that a lot, even I've used numbers like, yeah, two to five. I usually say two to five because
I'm a little bit more conservative. So fortunately, the two is closer to one and one is the median.
Now, does the range go higher? Of course, it does. Women, like I said, women with significant
PMS symptoms can retain two to three kilograms, which is five to six pounds. So that's a real thing.
It's a real phenomenon. We have to acknowledge that. This is the problem between population
averages and individuals with certain use cases. And there can be a lot of people that fall into
that ladder category for sure. But you have to, you have to, when you're looking at studies,
you have to compare what's being studied and what populations being looked at and don't make
assumptions. So the population average is much smaller than the internet is saying basically. And
if we conflate the PMS subgroup with all women, I think that creates a lot of panic for people that
just unnecessary. So this is where the nuance comes into play. So that's the pounds. Okay, so it's
usually like one one pound, but it could go as high as five to six if you have significant PMS
symptoms. The timing is also different from what a lot of people assume. So there was a study that
tracks 62 women across 765 menstrual cycles. And they found that fluid retention actually peaks on
day one of menstrual flow, not during the luteal phase. The mid follicular phase, which is about
day seven through 10 shows the lowest retention of fluid. So the lowest noise, I'll call it, the
lowest noise window for weighing yourself is about a week after your period starts, not right after
it ends. You may want to go back and listen to what I just said just to get all that. Okay, but it's
different than what some people assume. Now, the hormonal mechanisms underneath all this are worth
understanding as well because they explain why this isn't just something you can supplement away.
There's so much misinformation about supplements for all this stuff hormonal support and all that.
Estrogen lowers the threshold for your body to release anti diuretic hormone. So you hold on to water
at a lower set point, right? That means you're you're more prone to hold on to more water.
Progesterone initially promotes sodium excretion, which you would think would help.
And guess what happens? The body loves homeostasis. So when you have more when you're excreting
morisodium, it triggers a compensatory response from the reenin angiotensin aldosterone system.
I had to write that down because I would not remember it. The reenin or renin angiotensin
aldosterone system and that overshoots and increases your water retention. And by the way,
this is what happens a lot when you dehydrate it or when you drink too much alcohol and you get
dehydrated, your body compensates by actually retaining more water. And so that's why sometimes people
see a big jump on the scale like a day or two after they drink a lot, even though they were dehydrated
because the body compensates with water retention. So this is happening hormonally with with women.
One study actually showed progesterone drives a nearly three times increase in
aldosterone production just by itself. So your body is always trying to manage the fluid balance,
trying to keep things in balance. And it is doing it in response to these reproductive hormones
that are wildly changing every few days because of your cycle. And so there's really no supplement
or even food timing strategy that can like override that. It's going to happen. The question is
to what extent does it happen for you? Now what about metabolism? Let's talk metabolism.
Does your metabolic rate actually go up in the ludio phase? Yes, it does, sort of.
A meta-analysis of 30 studies found a small increase that favored higher RMR that's resting
metabolic rate in the ludio phase. But when they restricted the analysis to studies only published
in the last 25 years with better methodology, the effect became not statistically significant.
Okay, this is why we have to be careful how we reference the studies.
So a more realistic estimate of metabolic rate going up during the ludio phase is probably
about 100 extra calories a day on average. And that's about 1400 calories across a 14-day
ludio phase, which is the energy equivalent of 0.4 pounds of fat. So it's not nothing, it exists,
but it's not like 300 calories a day, you know, which would be three times that amount. And you're
like, oh, that's why I gain a pound of fat every month. No, but but it's not nothing. So again,
I don't want to gaslight any of this stuff. I want to approach it with some nuance. And honestly,
this is where this whole cycle syncing pitch starts to fall apart. I mean, it starts to fall apart.
There's a lot of other ways that it falls apart because the premise is that your metabolism
and your physiology shift enough between phases to justify different eating and training
protocols. But if in reality, the metabolic difference is small and the weight, the fluid retention
differences are actually rather small, then the case for restructuring your entire nutrition plan
around it really gets pretty thin. So I want to put this cycle syncing under the microscope
even more directly. That's what we do here, right? We put these things under the microscope and
see what makes sense. Let's talk about training first. The claim is that, okay, you should train
harder during the follicular phase. Your estrogen is higher. And then back off during the
luteal phase. And there's two studies that seem to support this. One is from 2014 looked at 20 women
and it assumed every participant had a 28-day cycle with ovulation on day 14, which is one of the
problems. Lauren Clenzel simple talks about that a lot is like these assumptions that everyone's
the same and then it totally waters down the data, if you will. And they verified the cycle phase
but only with basal body temperature, which is somewhat unreliable in doing that. The other study
from 2017 mixed together naturally cycling women with women on oral contraceptives in the same groups.
And neither study would probably pass the methodological bar that you would want from evidence-based
advice. And that's just scratching the surface. When we balance against those two studies,
there's an umbrella review. This is the highest level of evidence synthesis. We have synthesis
meaning combining multiple studies together, especially a meta review, especially an umbrella
review. It combines a lot together, concluded that prescribing resistance training based on
menstrual cycle phase is just not evidence-based. Three independent studies that used what would be
the gold standard muscle biopsy and stable isotope in their methodology. They found zero
difference in muscle protein synthesis between the two phases of the cycle, between the
follicular and luteal phases. In other words, your muscles respond to training the same way regardless
of where you are in your cycle. And this is consistent with a lot of what I'm hearing from experts
in the field who understand the literature. On the nutrition side, it's even simpler. There has
been no RCT randomized control trial that's ever compared cycle synch calorie or macrointake versus
consistent intake for fat loss or body composition outcomes. So there's just no evidence.
Any recommendation for syncing to your nutrition is probably extrapolating from hormonal fluctuation
data without testing that they actually produce different outcomes. That's all. And I want to be
fair about this. I want to be fair, okay, because cycle awareness is not the same as cycle syncing.
This is this is the side that I stand on knowing that you you dear listener tend to feel more
fatigued and low. You have a low energy state. You feel wiped in the luteal phase. And then adjusting
your training intensity based on how you feel that day and your recovery. That's a smart thing to do.
That is responsive auto regulated programming. And it is what I recommend. Awareness of your body
signals and how you feel and perform and all of that is great. Also tracking your symptoms
so that you can spot patterns and then know what's coming is smart too. But all that is is
listening to your body with with a better set of data, just like we try to do with other forms of
biofeedback, whether you're a man or woman, whether you're menstruating or not. That is not the
same as following a color coded calendar in an app that tells you to eat sweet potatoes in day 14
and reduce training volume on day 21. That is complete nonsense. I mean, even Stacey Sims,
who came on what was she on with Lauren Kalenzel's simple they kind of went at it and they argued
with each other. And you know, Lauren's more on the side of the nuance and like much of this stuff
is pretty much not supported by the evidence. Stacey Sims is probably the most prominent advocate
of training around the menstrual cycle. But she has even acknowledged this evolution in the
evidence recently, like last year, 2025. She wrote that there is no single right way for all women
to train around their cycles. And I heard her say it on the podcast. And so she's kind of evolved
her thinking as well. Good for her, right? The real story is individuality, which is essentially the
position that I'm presenting here and that I always try to present on the show. Now for women in
Perry menopause, Perry menopause is the entire period of hormonal fluctuations leading up to
menopause, which could be as long as 10, 15 years, you know, starting it as early as you're
mentally 30s. For women in Perry menopause, cycle seeking, cycle syncing is I'll say structurally
impossible. Because when your cycles shift from 26 days to 45 days to skipping months as you get
closer. And I know a lot of you are going through that. We don't talk about it enough, ladies. I know
that your cycle is not this fixed 28 day thing. If it is great, but that's not the case for a lot
of women I talk to. It changes. It sometimes gets wildly all over the place. It extends out. Sometimes
you don't have one. And this is even outside of like low energy states, a menorrhea and all that
from dieting. This is just it happens because of hormones, because of a pair of menopause.
In that case, what are you going to sink to? Like it's just going to, you know, drive yourself crazy.
The entire framework assumes a predictable hormonal pattern. And Perry menopause is often
defined by the loss of that predictability. All right, if you're hearing all of this, if you're
thinking, okay, okay, I get that cycle syncing is oversold. I also know just be patient and gas
lighting isn't going to do it for me. But I need I want someone to actually help me build that
system that works for my body. That is exactly what we've built with eat more lift heavy.
And I hope you guys love the name. I I'm really loving it because it says exactly the thing that
many of you need to do right in the name eat more lift heavy. It's a 26 week coaching program
launching March 30 where you get both training and nutrition coaching together, which almost nobody
offers at this price point over half the women in our intake data report hormonal concerns affecting
their progress. And our curriculum has an entire week dedicated to hormonal pattern awareness.
You learn about it, you personalize it, you apply it to yourself and you get coaching. And every
member gets a personalized plan that accounts for where they actually are, not where a generic chart
says they should be. If you want in at the lowest price that'll ever be our founders price,
get on the wait list now at witsandweights.com slash eat more. That's witsandweights.com slash eat more.
A link is in the show notes. The early access window is opening March 16. So get on the list so
that you get the emails that say here it's open. Here's the special deal you're going to get
once and only once, but you're going to get it because you're on the list. Go to witsandweights.com
slash eat more or click the link in the show notes. Okay, so we've established that cycle
syncing over promises under delivers and that just be patient does the same. So what do you do
instead? All right, two things. You're going to fix how you measure progress and you're going to
fix how you eat during the luteal phase. Here we go. How do we fix how we measure progress?
The goal is to separate the noise from hormones from the real body composition signals.
What's actually happening with your body and this is going to help you a lot emotionally too
and help you not overreact and know what's going on. The engineering principle here is simple. You
don't make decisions on noisy data. You have to filter it first. So I want you to think of it like a
filter. Step one, okay, we've got three steps here. Step one, weigh yourself daily but use a trend.
So for that, I recommend an app that can smooth the trend for you. You can do it in a spreadsheet,
you can do it on your own, but it takes a lot of math and using the right equations and like making
sure you do it and that tends to create a lot of friction and it's harder for people to get into
or stick with. So I would definitely use something like macro factor. That's my favorite app that does
that. And that's, I want you to weigh every day not because daily weigh-ins are some magical thing,
but because we know from the evidence, there was actually a study of 10,000 smart scale users in
2021 that found daily weighing was the only frequency associated with weight loss across all
BMI groups and and maintaining the weight loss. So the key here is you never react to a single
day's number. I know easier said than done. I get it, but if you're taking away it every day,
it eventually starts to get, it becomes less and less important and you just kind of get used
to seeing that it goes up and down. But what you really care about is the trend. And macro factor
does this well because they have an exponential moving average and then they have their expenditure
algorithm that takes your trend weight and your calorie intake and then they actually have their
algorithm now has improved handling of cyclical fluctuations. So and you can track your period as
well alongside it. It's it is very fast. So I like that app because it does all of that. So like
if you're working with us or if you're an eat more lift heavy, that's our recommended tool. And if
you come to say me or Carol and you want some feedback on your data, we're going to say, hey,
one of the one of the data points we need is your macro factor data because then we have your trend
weight and we know what your expenditure is. If you don't have that data kind of flying
blind, right, kind of flying in the dark. And so if you're doing this for yourself, same thing.
Step two. So that's step one is weigh yourself daily and use a trend smooth a smooth trend.
And that should that trend, by the way, should be over at least a two week period, but I really
prefer three weeks. Step two is to use same phase comparison. So phase to phase is how you
want to compare as your monthly sanity check. So you're going to compare your weight from the
mid follicular phase this month, like days seven through 10 to your mid follicular phase last month.
That's that's your most stable hormonal windows, the mid follicular phase. And again, you want to
take the trend weight from that point, but even if you have just a few spot weights, a few
individual scale weights, at least it's been a month and you can do that comparison, but take
several of them. Don't just take one day. If that numbers moving in the direction you want over say
three months, hey, your plan's working. If it's flat, something is off and we need to adjust.
And that eliminates a lot of the false alarms that come from weighing yourself, you know,
pre-mancerally, and comparing it to a random day three weeks ago. Step three, and this is really
important if you're in perimenopause. And that is to extend your evaluation window. Listen to me
carefully. I want you to extend your evaluation window, the window if within which you evaluate
what's happening, because when your cycles are more and more irregular as they tend to be in
perimenopause, especially closer to menopause you are, you cannot rely even on step two, the same
phase comparisons, because there's no reliable data, no reliable phase to compare. Instead, you're
going to use longer moving averages. You're going to use four to six week moving averages before
concluding that any weight change is real. And I know that takes patience. And I know you got to
wait and you want the quick fix and the quick change, but you're not going to get it. In fact,
you're going to slow your progress down. You're going to go in the wrong direction if you over
react to the short term, because if you end up under eating and stressing your your body out
further, it could actually compensate the wrong direction by burning fewer calories and actually
making you have a worse outcome. But in addition to this, see that that's just scale weight.
Honestly, you've heard me talk about how scale weight is just a tiny piece of the puzzle and
really not that important. I would supplement your scale data with your waist measurement,
how your clothes fit, of course, how you're improving in the gym with your strength,
and even progress photos. Those things can all be very helpful, because the scale alone is going
to miss all the changes in your body composition, like building muscle and losing fat at the same time,
for example. And during period menopause, those shifts can be pretty dramatic. We know from
plenty of research at this point that the rate of fat gain tends to jump up almost double. I think
it did double at the start of the menopausal transition. And lean mass is declining as well.
Of course, you know, you listen to whits and weights, you lift weights, you're reading a protein,
right? Well, if you're not, that's a whole different thing we got to deal with and get you doing
that. But a woman whose scale weight is fairly stable still might be gaining fat and losing muscle.
Obviously, the opposite could happen to you. It could be gaining muscle and losing fat.
It depends on your lifestyle and what you're doing. And the scale alone is not just is just not
going to tell you that. So that's the measurement side. On the nutrition fix, okay, let's talk about
nutrition. We have the behavioral side of this first. And this is big. Luteal phase, the
luteal phase is notorious for having lots of hunger. I've seen it over and over again. Okay.
I can't imagine where like once a month your hunger just is higher than it is the rest of the
month. So I feel for you. There's a meta analysis I found of 15 data sets that show the average
increase in energy intake. So how much you eat during the luteal phase is about 168 calories per
day. And for women with PMS, it's closer to 300. And then if you fight this, we're trying to
restrict calories. That's like the worst possible strategy because all it does is amplify the what
the hell effect, the all or nothing effect. And then it works against the the serotonin deficit.
That's what's going on here that is driving the cravings. Now why is serotonin important because
serotonin levels drop in the luteal phase. And carbohydrate, carb cravings appear to function
as a form of self-medication because eating carbs increases trip to fan. The trip to fan ratio
that feeds how your body synthesizes serotonin. And there's a study on this. There was a
double blind crossover study that gave women with confirmed PMS either a high carb beverage or
an identical tasting placebo. And the carb drink significantly reduced depression, anger,
and cravings within 90 to 180 minutes. And the placebo did nothing. So the cravings are not
a failure of your willpower. They are your brain requesting a specific input that it needs.
Interesting, right? So what's the fix here? Well, it's not to fight the hunger. It's to redirect
that hunger. This is a powerful tool, ladies. Listen, okay? This is something I've learned working
with clients and it works a lot. First, you've got to leverage protein. If you are not already eating
the right amount of protein per day and having protein in every meal, that's your biggest
opportunity. 30 to 40 grams of protein every meal, especially your first meal of the day during that
gluteal phase. The reason is protein is when it's diluted in your diet, like when you don't have
enough, right? Total calorie intake goes up because your body keeps eating it until it gets enough
protein. So if you can front load protein, you're going to satisfy that target earlier for your body
and reduce the amount of calories you'll calories you overshoot for the day. So if you're not
already leveraging plenty of protein, that's number one. The second thing is using complex carbs
strategically. Don't cut carbs during the gluteal phase. That's the opposite of which a brain needs.
But what you can do is include complex carbs like whole grains, legumes,
starchy vegetables in all your meals. And then you support your serotonin without the crash
and blood sugar that comes from simpler carbs. Although I don't want to overstate the blood sugar
thing if you're eating balanced meals anyway, even if you have simple carbs as long as they're with
proteins and fats, you tend to be okay anyway. And then if you're lifting weights and walking,
it just makes it even better. But carbs can be your friend for sure. So listen up. If you're low
carb, this could be the problem. Third, I want you to allow a modest increase during that phase.
So actually shift your calories. If your metabolic rate actually does go up at least 100 calories or so,
like if you've proven it for yourself through your tracking, and again, the only way to do that is
a tool like macro factor where you can tell. Then eating an extra say 100 to 200 calories
during those 10 to 14 days is just going to offset it. In other words, you're not going to,
you're not going to stop losing fat. You're not going to gain weight. It's just going to offset it.
And I know you want to like take advantage of the fact you're burning more calories. But if you're
also massively more hungry, you might overshoot that benefit through your food. But if you intentionally
increase your food a little bit to match it, then it can on the net work out better. And then over
the full cycle, the math washes out in your favor. But if you're trying to maintain a steep deficit
during the phase when your body is most resistant to it, then it usually creates the psychological
conditions that lead to you binge eating. Does that make sense? I hope that all makes sense that I
didn't get like two technical because even for myself, I realized the way I worded all that was
kind of in the weeds. But the principle across all of this is to work with your biology,
not to sink or cycle sink, but understand your body has physiological explanations that are going
on. And little tweaks in your nutrition and your measurement can go a long way to supporting you
through your pattern of your cycle. And not every woman's going to need every one of these
strategies. Now, I want to be clear about what I'm not claiming here because, again, nuance,
guys, nuance. I'm not saying your cycle doesn't affect how you feel. I'm definitely not. It absolutely
does. It does fatigue, mood shifts, bloating, cramps. You name it. All of that is real. And if you
adjust your training intensity or expectations based on how you feel, that's a smart thing to do.
And it's independent of trying to align it with your cycle. It's based on how you're feeling.
I'm also not saying that tracking your cycle is useless. It's actually very useful. I even
mentioned that in macro factor, you can track it and then it aligns it with the other stuff going
on there. And it's helpful if you have a coach or if you're in our program and then you can share
your data. But for yourself, knowing those patterns gives you better data. And a lot of you do
already track your cycle and may not be tracking it against the other things. But what I'm saying,
what I'm not saying to do is restructure your entire diet and training plan around this 28 day
idea that half the population doesn't even follow predictably. Like half of women don't even fall
into the quote-unquote normal, you know, ovulation cycle. I'm also not saying the scale doesn't matter.
It's a useful data point among many. But I am saying that a single day's weigh in during the
late luteal phase is one of the least helpful things you can collect and that making decisions
based on it is not helpful for the reasons we talked about earlier. So what I am saying from
this whole episode is this, you deserve a better framework than quote-unquote sink your macros to
the moon or quote-unquote just relax. The water weight fluctuations are normal and it's all going
to average out. No, you've got to be intentional and the fix here is a measurement system to filter
the noise out. A nutrition approach that respects your individual biology and then of course patients
to evaluate progress over multiple cycles, not just days or a few weeks. Before we wrap up,
remember that I promised you a one meal change that blunts cravings before they start any time
they spike. I will share that in a second. But if this episode is clicking for you, if you are
enjoying this, if you want a structured system for navigating all of this with human coaching,
support, eat more, lift, heavy is coming. It's a 26 week program. It integrates training and
nutrition coaching together. It is built for women over 40 who lift and track but are not seeing the
results. And hormonal pattern awareness is built directly into the curriculum, not to mention
coach Carol. She is amazing. She is an expert in women over 40 hormones and thyroid health,
especially and has personal experience with all of those. The weight list with founder pricing
at the lowest it'll ever be is open now go to witsandweights.com slash eat more. That's witsandweights.com
slash eat more. There's no obligation at all. You can join the list for free just so you get the
information go to witsandweights.com slash eat more. By the way, if you're already on my email list,
you still want to go there and get on the weight list specifically because you'll get tagged for the
early access and the founders pricing. All right, let's talk about the strategy for cravings.
Next time you have cravings, whether it is PMS week, maybe you had a bad sleep night, maybe
you have a stressful afternoon. Honestly, men, women, whatever the cravings are from,
this is what you do. At your very first meal of the day, hit at least 40 grams of protein before
anything else. And that could be two eggs plus a couple of Greek yogurt. That could be a protein
shake. And the 40 grams is more than enough to suppress grailin that's your hunger hormone.
It elevates CCK. That's a satiety hormone. And it does so for several hours because cravings
are partly a hunger management problem. They are partly a hunger management problem. You're like,
yeah, duh, but what I mean by that is when your baseline hunger is already elevated because of
your hormones or poor sleep or stress, your threshold for giving into the hunger is lower.
And protein raises it back up. It raises it back up. So you front load the protein,
and then you build the rest of the meal around things like whole grains and start to vegetables,
a little bit of fat, especially if carb cravings are the issue. You see what I'm saying here?
If carb cravings are the issue, why don't you eat some carbs? But eat the carbs that you choose
that will benefit you. All right, I'm not talking about donuts and pizza. I'm not talking about
reading the pantry or the fridge on a whim. I'm talking about be intentional and have whole grains,
fruits, starchy vegetables, things like that. And that way you're not fighting the craving.
You are taking the edge off with intention and responding to it gracefully instead of reacting
to it. And isn't that what we all want to do? All right, until next time, keep using your wits,
lifting those weights. And remember, your cycle is not the enemy of fat loss. It's just data that most
people never learned. I'm Philip Pape, and I'll talk to you next time here on The Wits and Wits

Wits & Weights | Evidence-Based Fitness & Nutrition for Lifters Over 40

Wits & Weights | Evidence-Based Fitness & Nutrition for Lifters Over 40

Wits & Weights | Evidence-Based Fitness & Nutrition for Lifters Over 40
